0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
75 Ansichten1 Seite
Lawrence Kohlberg proposed 6 stages of moral development based on his research posing moral dilemmas to subjects. [Stage 0 focuses on self-interest, Stage 1 on obedience and rules, Stage 2 on fair exchanges and what's in it for oneself. Stage 3 focuses on interpersonal relationships, Stage 4 on responsibilities to systems or groups, and Stage 5 on principles of human rights and dignity.] Kohlberg asked subjects to reason through moral dilemmas and analyzed their justifications to determine their stage of moral reasoning.
Lawrence Kohlberg proposed 6 stages of moral development based on his research posing moral dilemmas to subjects. [Stage 0 focuses on self-interest, Stage 1 on obedience and rules, Stage 2 on fair exchanges and what's in it for oneself. Stage 3 focuses on interpersonal relationships, Stage 4 on responsibilities to systems or groups, and Stage 5 on principles of human rights and dignity.] Kohlberg asked subjects to reason through moral dilemmas and analyzed their justifications to determine their stage of moral reasoning.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Lawrence Kohlberg proposed 6 stages of moral development based on his research posing moral dilemmas to subjects. [Stage 0 focuses on self-interest, Stage 1 on obedience and rules, Stage 2 on fair exchanges and what's in it for oneself. Stage 3 focuses on interpersonal relationships, Stage 4 on responsibilities to systems or groups, and Stage 5 on principles of human rights and dignity.] Kohlberg asked subjects to reason through moral dilemmas and analyzed their justifications to determine their stage of moral reasoning.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Lawrence Kohlberg (1927-1987) was a well-known theorist in the field of
moral development. He posed moral dilemmas to his subjects then asked questions to probe their reasons for recommending a specific course of action.
STAGE 0: What's Right: I should get my own way.
EGOCENTRIC Reason to be - REASONING good:
PRE- STAGE 1: What's Right: I should do what I'm told.
CONVENTI- UNQUESTIONED To stay out of trouble. To get rewards and ONAL OBEDIENCE Reason to be avoid punishments. MORALITY good:
STAGE 2: I should look out for myself but be fair to
What's Right: WHAT'S-IN-IT- those who are fair to me. FOR ME Self-interest: What's in it for me? FAIRNESS Reason to be good:
CONVENTI- STAGE 3: I should be a nice person and live up to
ONAL INTERPERSONA What's Right: the expectations of people I know and MORALITY L care about. CONFORMITY So others will think well of me (social Reason to be approval) and I can think well of myself good: (self-esteem) STAGE 4: I should fulfil my responsibilities to the What's Right: RESPONSIBILIT social or value system I feel part of. Y TO "THE To keep the system from falling apart and SYSTEM" Reason to be to maintain self-respect as somebody who good: meets my obligations. POST- STAGE 5: I should show the greatest possible CONVENTI- PRINCIPLED respect for the rights and dignity of every What's Right: ONAL CONSCIENCE individual person and should support a MORALITY system that protects human rights. The obligation of conscience to act in Reason to be accordance with the principle of respect good: for all human beings.
*Stages 1 through 5 are adapted from Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral
reasoning as described in Kohlberg (1975, 1978, 1981); Stage 0 is adapted from William Damon (1977) and Robert Selman (1980).