Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
htm
I am an unmarried, conservative male. I have always been supportive of the life of the unborn. However, in the past
my opinion was, "Well, the country is evenly divided on this issue. Although I am personally against abortion, there
are others who don't agree with me. I won't force the issue unless there is a consensus against abortion. I will thus
support the democratic process." However, I have gradually realized that the abortions (murders of the unborn) are
continuing at the rate of FOUR THOUSAND ABORTIONS PER DAY in the USA (ONE HUNDRED
TWENTY THOUSAND PER DAY worldwide). Meanwhile, some people are actually campaigning to increase
access to abortions. I have finally realized that, "Abortion is terrible, and must be stopped. Part of the democratic
process is the free discussion of ideas. Others are expressing their opinions, and some of them are against mine. I
should express my opinions, too. I will thus support the democratic process."
The format of this response is as follows: I have included every word of Planned Parenthood's original opinion.
Planned Parenthood makes it's statement, then I refute it one paragraph at a time. In order to guarantee that my
response is well separated from Planned Parenthood's original statement, I will color all of my responses blue. Also,
all of Planned Parenthood's statements begin with a bullet. (Note: The following discussion is focused on the United
States of America. Abortion should be fought in every country, but the circumstances of each country are different,
and some of the below points may not apply to every country on Earth.)
Abortion is never an easy decision, but women have been making that choice for thousands of years, for many
good reasons. Whenever a society has sought to outlaw abortions, it has only driven them into back alleys
where they became dangerous, expensive, and humiliating. Amazingly, this was the case in the United States
until 1973, when abortion was legalized nationwide. Thousands of American women died.
Abortion is a hard decision for many good reasons. Whenever a society has condoned abortions, they are
greater in number than when abortions are proscribed. Abortion kills babies which could otherwise live a long
life. Killing these babies is definitely dangerous to them, and much worse than humiliating. Amazingly,
because of legalization of abortion in 1973, about 1.5 Million babies (One Million Five Hundred Thousand, or
1,500,000) of American babies are being murdered in legal abortions every year. (Sources: The World
1 of 8 6/29/2008 4:40 PM
9 Reasons Why Abortions Should Be Illegal http://www.mrdata.net/books/9reasons.htm
Thousands more were maimed. For this reason and others, women and men fought for and achieved women's
legal right to make their own decisions about abortion.
By your own admission, for every 1 (one) woman that died or was maimed when abortions were illegal,
thousands
of babies are being murdered. For this reason and others, women and men are fighting for the right of babies to
live.
However, there are people in our society who still won't accept this. Some argue that even victims of rape or
incest should be forced to bear the child. And now, having failed to convince the public or the lawmakers,
certain of these people have become violent extremists, engaging in a campaign of intimidation and terror
aimed at women seeking abortions and health professionals who work at family planning clinics.
Surveys of women aborting their babies indicate that 1% of them are doing so because of rape or incest.
(Source: Forrest, J.D. & Torres, A. "Why Do Women Have Abortions?" Family Planning Perspectives).
Pro-life supporters have convinced the public and lawmakers that abortion, in general, is horrible. Congress
has repeatedly passed anti-abortion bills, only to have them vetoed by a pro-abortion, Liberal President.
Recently there is increasing possibility that Congress will get the 2/3 (two thirds) vote necessary to override
the Presidential veto. The main cause of Federal legalization of abortion was the Supreme Court of 1973, not
the public or the lawmakers. Failing to sufficiently convince the public or lawmakers, pro-abortion (also
known as pro-choice) supporters have instituted an insidious campaign of misinformation, emotionalism, and
Political Correctness aimed to make abortion seem acceptable. (By the way, although I do not support
campaigns of intimidation and terror, I am forced to wonder how this compares to the pain of babies literally
being torn apart without even anesthesia.)
Some say these acts will stop abortions, but that is ridiculous. When the smoke clears, the same urgent reasons
will exist for safe, legal abortions as have always existed. No nation committed to individual liberty could
seriously consider returning to the days of back-alley abortions; to the revolting specter of a government
forcing women to bear children against their will. Still, amid such attacks, it is worthwhile to repeat a few of
the reasons why our society trusts each woman to make the abortion decision herself.
The act which will stop abortion is the act of making the decision to be more careful regarding sexual activity
and to be responsible for the consequences of sexual activity, including the consequence of an unwanted
pregnancy. The same urgent reasons have always existed for being careful regarding sex. (These are reasons
such as disease, emotional entanglements, and, of course, pregnancy.) No nation committed to individual
liberty could seriously consider the wholesale murder of helpless babies with little concern for the concern for
the well being of the babies. Women aren't forced to bear children, they choose to bear children by the act of
having sexual intercourse. (Note that surveys indicate that rape or incest account for only 1% of legal
abortions.) Saying that the government forces women to bear children against their will is like saying that the
government forces people to become fat after they decide to eat too much and not exercise enough. Bearing
children is the natural result of sexual intercourse under favorable conditions, it is not forced upon women by
the United States government. I am forced to wonder: If a woman has a history of bad decisions which cause
her an unwanted pregnancy, why should our society trust her to take the welfare of the child into account and
trust her "to make the abortion decision herself"? Still, though it is clear that women have made choices that
put them in the position of being pregnant, it is worthwhile to repeat a few reasons why abortion is an
abhorrent murder of a baby.
2 of 8 6/29/2008 4:40 PM
9 Reasons Why Abortions Should Be Illegal http://www.mrdata.net/books/9reasons.htm
a. Regarding Science and Medicine: Currently, all valid science and medicine is 100% clear that a fetus is
a person. Practically, 100% of a person's genetic makeup is determined at the moment of conception.
Science and medicine define being a person (human) by genetic means. According to science and
medicine, a fetus is a distinct organism.
b. Regarding Religion: Religion, on the other hand, is not as clearly defined as medicine and science,
because religion introduces the soul into the situation. However, no religious leader would say that a
fetus does not have a soul and that because of this a fetus may be capriciously aborted. Religious
opinion is slowly beginning to accept science and medicine. Any religious leader with a strong practical
grounding in scientific knowledge will have to admit that every embryo has a soul. However, regardless
of when a person gains a soul, religious opinion does not show any support at all for abortion. In fact,
religion is one of the strongest opponents of abortion.
c. Regarding Philosophy: Philosophical opinion does show some variety regarding when a baby becomes a
person. This is due solely to the fact that most philosophy is of ancient origin. Regardless of whether a
philosopher believes ancient philosophies (which were developed before the discovery of cells, heredity,
and DNA), the philosopher would not support capricious abortions.
d. Conclusion: Neither science, nor medicine, nor religion, nor philosophy supports capricious abortions.
In fact, there is a narrow band of belief in science, medicine, religion, and philosophy that life is
valuable, should be supported, and should not be killed when the killing is reasonably avoided. In fact,
those who believe strongly in science, in medicine, in religion, or in philosophy are some of the
3 of 8 6/29/2008 4:40 PM
9 Reasons Why Abortions Should Be Illegal http://www.mrdata.net/books/9reasons.htm
4 of 8 6/29/2008 4:40 PM
9 Reasons Why Abortions Should Be Illegal http://www.mrdata.net/books/9reasons.htm
In Conclusion: Wouldn't it make better sense to consider the option of adoption, rather than the option of
abortion? Waiting lists are never ending for adoptable newborns. Instead of losing his or her life, the baby
instead gets a chance to have a good life with a married couple who highly desire a child to love, raise, and, in
other words, parent.
7. Keep abortion legal, and more children will abort their children.
The so called "penalty" should be enforced maintenance of any pregnancy which does not involve serious
health risks to the mother or baby. "Enforced childrearing" is not condoned by anyone, and it is ridiculous to
seriously consider "enforced childrearing".
5 of 8 6/29/2008 4:40 PM
9 Reasons Why Abortions Should Be Illegal http://www.mrdata.net/books/9reasons.htm
submitting to various screening procedures. Adopted babies are treated almost as well as the biological
children of married parents: they are not brutalized and abandoned. In general, the children which are
seriously disadvantaged are those children who are fortunate enough to not have been aborted, but are
unfortunate enough to be raised by the mother alone, without the father's assistance. In these cases, adoption is
a better solution, too.
At the most basic level, the abortion issue is not really about abortion. It is about the value of women in
society. Should women make their own decisions about family, career, and how to live their lives? Or should
government do that for them? Do women have the option of deciding when or whether to have children? Or is
that a government decision?
Women should be able to make decisions about how to live their lives. Women do make decisions about how
to live their lives. Women should have the option of deciding when or whether to have children. They do this
by making choices regarding when to have sexual intercourse and what contraceptive methods to use. The
government has no power to make these decisions, and it doesn't. Abortion is not a choice about women's
value, family, career, how to live their lives, or when or whether to have children. Abortion is a choice
between allowing an unborn baby to live or killing it.
The anti-abortion leaders really have a larger purpose. They oppose most ideas and programs which can help
women achieve equality and freedom. They also oppose programs which protect the health and well-being of
women and their children.
I support any "ideas and programs which can help women achieve equality and freedom" or "protect the health
and well-being of women and their children." I don't know these "anti-abortion leaders".
Anti-abortion leaders claim to act "in defense of life." If so, why have they worked to destroy programs which
serve life, including prenatal care and nutrition programs for dependent pregnant women? Is this respect for
life?
Who are these "Anti-abortion leaders"? They sound like a real threat to society. Let me know who they are and
what they are doing, and I will fight against them and their campaigns to "destroy programs which serve life."
If they truly are as you portray them, they aren't my leaders, since I don't follow their opinions. I fully support
life in all of its forms, especially human life. Anyone who supports life in general must also support the life of
the unborn.
Anti-abortion leaders also say they are trying to save children, but they have fought against health and
nutrition programs for children once they are born. The anti-abortion groups seem to believe life begins at
conception, but it ends at birth. Is this respect for life?
Once again, let me know who they are, and I will work against them. Who in his right mind could fight against
health and nutrition programs for children?
6 of 8 6/29/2008 4:40 PM
9 Reasons Why Abortions Should Be Illegal http://www.mrdata.net/books/9reasons.htm
Then there are programs which diminish the number of unwanted pregnancies before they occur: family
planning counseling, sex education, and contraception for those who wish it. Anti-abortion leaders oppose
those too. And clinics providing such services have been bombed. Is this respect for life?
I fully support "family planning counseling, sex education, and contraception". I support any programs which
diminish the number of unwanted pregnancies before they occur. Your mythical "Anti-abortion leaders" do not
have any influence on the members of the pro-life group. The only pro-life group I can think of in the United
States which opposes sex education and contraception is the religious pro-life. However, no religious pro-life
group that I know of opposes family counseling or contraception based in rhythm methods.
Such stances reveal the ultimate cynicism of the compulsory pregnancy movement. "Life" is not what they're
fighting for. What they want is a return to the days when a woman had few choices in controlling her future.
They think that the abortion option gives too much freedom. That even contraception is too liberating. That
women cannot be trusted to make their own decisions.
You speak of "the compulsory pregnancy movement". Who are the members of this movement? Is this another
mythical group? Compulsory pregnancy would seem to include forced impregnation. I must admit, any group
which supports forced impregnation must indeed take freedoms away from women. Such groups should be
stopped by any means possible. I and my fellow pro-life people, on the other hand, fully support women's
freedoms, including the freedom of making the essential choices of when to have sexual intercourse and what
contraceptives to use. These choices are essential in preventing pregnancy.
Americans today don't accept that. Women can now select their own paths in society, including when and
whether to have children. Family planning, contraception, and, if need be, legal abortion are critical to
sustaining women's freedom. There is no going back.
Women should select their own paths in society, including when and whether to have children. Family
planning and contraception are critical aids to sustaining many freedoms of both men and women. I hope that
someday the United States of America will once again make abortion illegal. This will also give the right to
life to the unborn and will allow them to have freedoms of their own when they are born.
If you agree with this, you can help. Circulate this statement among your friends, and support our work by
contacting Planned Parenthood in your area. Thank you.
If you agree that human life has value, including the lives of the unborn, then speak out when the time comes!
Don't keep quiet while millions of babies are murdered in cold blood. Speak out! Bookmark this page. Show it
to others. Better yet, if you have a Web site, put a link to this page on your Web site! Spread the word! Thank
you.
Portions Copyright © 1998 by Mr Israel Steinmetz. These portions released into the Public Domain.
7 of 8 6/29/2008 4:40 PM