UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NORTHERN NEW YORK M. Greene ) Karen M. Greene ) COMPLAINT ) PURSUANT TO Plaintiffs, ) 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, CASE NO. 08-cv-0280 ) 1001, 1031, 1341, (LEK/DRH) ) 1344(2), 1346, ) 1581, 1621, 1622, U.S. DISTRICT COUF Internal Revenue Service )2113 & 3231, N.D. OF 8.Y. ) 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 FILED Defendant ) & 1343, SUN 27 2008 )42 US.C. §§ 1983 ) & 1994 LAWRENCE K, BAERMAN, CLERK ALBANY PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS SUBMITTED BY GLENN T. SUDDABY, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, AND LISA L. BELLAMY, ‘TRIAL ATTORNEY, TAX DIVISION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Dated: June 27, 2008TABLE OF CONTENTS. ‘Table of Contents Table of Authorities Cases Statutes . . Code of Federal Regulations. FDIC Law, Regulations, Related Acts Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Constitution . Other References Argument ... Qui Tam Plaintiffs Are Not Taxpayers In Accordance With Congress’ Article 4 § 3(2) Legislative Jurisdiction And Therefore Are Not Subject To The Provisions Of The Internal Revenue Code. ‘Accordingly, This Action Is Not Prohibited By The Declaratory Judgment Act .... 1-21 Conclusion, The Government Has Admitted That The Intemal Revenue Service Is NOT An Agency Of The United States, Congress Never Authorized The Named Accused Government Contractor (IRS) To Operate Or Encroach Into The 50 States Of The Union, And Under This Condition Counsel Appointed For The Internal Revenue Service Is Also Limited In Terms Of Article 4 § 3(2) Of The Constitution Such That ‘The Named Accused Government Contractor (IRS) ‘Must Find It’s Own Attorney's 21-24 Certificate of Service/Plaintifis’ Declaration ixx Listing of ExhibitsTABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Adams v. U.S. 319 U.S. 312 (1943) . American Civil Liberties Union v. City of Birmingham, 791 F.2d 1561, 93 (1986) .... 1 American Civil Liberties v. Ity of St. Charles and Fred T.L. Norris, 794 F.2d 265, 93 (7th C - 1986) American Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. United States, 177 F.3d 1368, 93 (Fed. Cir. 1999). Bailey v. State of Alabama, 219 U.S. 219 (1910) .. Binns v. United States, 194 U.S. 486, 24 S.Ct. 816, 48 L.Ed. 1087. Boulez v. C.LR., 810 F.2d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1987) .. Butcher's Union Co. v Crescent City Co. 111 U.S. 746 (1884) Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U.S. 238, 296-297 (1936) ... 7.24 Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 292 (1979) ... + 3,16 Commissioner v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 95 (1959)) .. ww 4 Cooper v. Aaron 358 U.S. 1 (1958) ... 18 Coppage vs. State of Kansas, 236 U.S. 1, 23-24 (1915) . Diversified Metal Products, Inc., v. ‘T-Bow Company Trust, Internal Revenue Service, and Steven Morgan (Civil No. 93-405-E-EJL, UNITED STATES’ ANSWER AND CLAIM) .... 3,21 Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244, 21 §.Ct. 770 45 L.Ed. 1088. .. Einhorn v. DeWitt, 618 F.2d 347 (Sth Cir. 1980) ..... Hylton v. U. S., 3 U.S. 171 (1796) .... Jack Cole vs. MacFarland, 337 S.W. 2d 453, 455-56 (Tenn, 1960). .. Lawrence v, Wardell, 273 F. 205, 408 (9th Cir. 1921) Lurhing v. Glotzbach, 304 F.2d 360 (4th Cir. 1962) ....... ii