Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Page 1 of 7
Standard department No guarantee can be given inrespect of this translation. In all cases the latest German-language version of this SEP 1922 en.doc
Stuttgart 17.07.2000 standard shall be taken as authoritve.
Winkler
form no. T607e – 09.99
Page 2 of 7 Steel Iron Test Sheet 1922 July 1985
segments of the calibration blocks as per DIN 54120 or 10.2 General information on the test procedure
DIN 54122 to ultrasonic waves. The choice of the direction of incidence and the suitable
The echo height in the depth range to be calculated is probes (see also section 7.2) depend largely on the shape
characterized by giving the diameter of a circular reflector in of casting, the possible casting flaws and manufacturing
mm in accordance with the distance-gain-size (DGS) weld flaws. For the reason the manufacturer shall determine
method 1) 2). the most favorable procedure. It is convenient to stipulate
the test procedure in testing instructions taking into conside-
ration areas which are critical for reasons of casting
practice. Manufacturing welds and all areas which are
9 Determining the ultrasonic testability endangered by cracks shall also be tested with angle beam
The ultrasonic testability characterizes the property of the probes.
casting material to permit detection of a definite circular In test class I the casting areas to be tested (see sections 4
reflector size with sufficient accuracy. and 10.1) shall, if possible, be examined from both surfaces
A secure verification conventionally signifies that the echo using at least straight beam probes. Areas which are
height of the respective circular reflector, at the end of the accessible from one side only shall be tested with straight
depht range to be evaluated, usually in the interval of the beam probes and also with TR probes for detecting reflec-
first back wall echo in accordance with DGS diagrams 1), is tors close to the surface. An examination using TR probes
at least 8 dB above the noise level 3). is sufficient for testing areas accessible from one side and
with wall thickness up to 60 mm. If the unilateral testing of
Such US (ultra sonic) testability is determined in indication
the casting indicates reflection points close to the probe,
free areas which are characteristic for the wall thickness of
probes with short-range resolution shall be used additio-
the casting and ensure a maximum echo height of the back nally.
wall echo based upon their shape, e. g. walls with parallel
surfaces. The customer has the obligation to point out to the manu-
facturer special requirements for the test procedure which
By convention a casting, to which this testing sheet applies,
might result from the future use of the casting.
shows sufficient US testability, if circular reflectors of at
least 3 mm diameter for class I and 6 mm diameter for 10.3 Scanning rate
class II can be accurately verified (see table 1). For testing the scanning rate of the probe shall not exceed
If the echo height of these smallest detectable circular 10 cm/s. The paths shall be placed as close to each other
reflectors show less than 3 dB above the noise level at the as to ensure an uninterrupted scanning of the complete
end of the depth range to be evaluated even if the proce- volume to be tested. This is usually attained if the paths
dure is changed, for example by changing the test frequen- overlap by ¼ of the crystal diameter but depends in the
cy, there is a reduced ultrasonis testability and the test individual case on the type of probe used.
report has to state which circular reflector size as per DGS
diagram 1) would be resolved with a signal-to-noise distance 10.4 Test sensitivity
of the least 8 dB. In this case the further procedure has to It is principally preferable to adjust the sensitivity ot the test
be agreed upon by the manufacturer and the customer. equipment (test sensitivity) on the casting itself. If this not
Note: To determine the US testability of the casting to be possible, adjusting or calibration blocks as per DIN 54120
tested with perpendicular incidence the amplifier or DIN 54122 shall be used. Transfer corrections are reqi-
threshold of the test equipment can be switched off red in these cases. The determination of the transfer
and the back wall echo be raised to an arbitrary correction has to take into consideration not only the quality
reference echo height then the gain is increased as of the coupling surface but also that of the opposite surface
the DGS diagram, until the echo heights of the because this influences the height of the back wall echo 4)
3 mm diameter circular reflector of class I and the (used for the calibration).
6 mm diameter circular reflector of class II attain For flaw detection, the gain shall be increased until the
the reference height. A further gain increase by noise level becomes visible on the screen (search sensi-
8 dB may raise the noise level no higher than the tivity).
reference echo height. If necessary, a reference
reflector may be used in a range without back wall
echo for determining the testability.
___________________
1
) Krautkrämer, J.: Arch. Eisenhüttenwesen 30 (1959)
page 693/703. See also Steel Iron Delivery Specifica-
10 Performing the test tions 072-69 annex 1.
2
) More details concerning the determination of the circular
10.1 Extent of testing reflector size are described in “Guidelines for the
The casting areas to be tested as agreed upon (see section Ultrasonic Examination of Weld Joints”, issued by the
4) shall be examined to the fullest extent possible given the German Society for Nondestructive Testing.
3
shape of the casting and using the most favorable testing ) Sum of noise and structural indications.
4
procedure. ) The opposite surface has a quality sufficient for transfer
correction measurements if the surface is machi-ned or
compiles at least with pattern 4 S 1 or 4 S 2 of the
standard serias CTIF-341-02 when using straight beam
probes or pattern 4 S 1 or 3 S 2 of the standard serias
CTIF-341-02 when using angel beam probes.
Steel Iron Test Sheet 1922 July 1985 Page 3 of 7
It has to be ensured that the echo heights of the circular Both types of echo indication which might occur separatly or
reflectors which are mentioned in section 9 and charac- jointly have to be observed and evaluated.
terize a sufficient ultrasonic testability are at least 2/5 of the The height of the echo indication is given as circular
screen height at the end of the depth range to be evaluated. reflector size 2), the attenuation of the back wall echo is
If during testing the suspicion arises that the attenuation of expressed in db as drop of the back wall echo height.
the back wall echo indication exceeds the permissible
value, the testing has to be performed with a locally
reduced test sensivity and the attenuation of the back wall 10.6 Recording levels and recording of
echo indication be determined quantitatively. recordable echo indications
When adjusting the test sensitivity of angle beam probes it Unless otherwise stipulated all echo heights or back wall
has to be ensured that plane reflectors perpendicular to the echo attenuations reaching or exceeding the following
coupling surface and with echo heights below the recording recording levels have to be recorded depending on the test
level of KSR 3 are indicated. class.
The adjustment of the test sensitivity has to be such that the Independent of the echo height the following indica-tions
typical dynamic echo pattern of these reflectors (see Fig. 3) are recordable:
is clearly visible on the screen. a) Echo indications suggesting coherrent flaws of exten-
sive longitudinal or depth extension.
It is recommendet to verify the sensitivity of angle beam b) Echo indications suggesing casing defects in an unfa-
probes on real plane flaws (cracks with depth extension) or vorable location relative to the sound beam.
on a component wall arranged perpendicular to the coupling
surface and infinite for the sound beam. This requires that Depending on the echo height echo indications exceeding
the probe bottom fits the casting shape. the levels given in table 1 have to be recorded.
Note: For flaw detection with simultaneous observation of All locations where recordable reflectors have been found
the back wall echo the use of equipment with must be marked and specified in the test report (section
adjustable bach wall echo attenuation is recom- 14). The location of the reflection points can, if necessary,
mended. be described by a grid, documented by a sketch or by
taking a picture.
The test sensitivity can differ considerably if the
surface quality changes locally. It is then essential
that the conditions for adjusting the search sensitivity
described in the second papagraph of this section 11 Examination of recordable reflectors
are observed. The locations where recordable reflectors have been found
For testing with TR straight beam probes the sensi- (see section 10.6) are to be examined more closely with
tivity shall be adjusted on the casting in areas where respect to type, form, size and location of the reflectors.
coupling and opposite surfaces are as parallel as This can be achieved by a change of the ultrasonic test
possible. If this is impossible adjusting blocks with technique (see sections 12.1 and 12.2), by x-raying,
parallel surfaces or flat-bottom holes shall be used. grinding etc.
10.5 Consideration of different kinds of echo
indications
The following types of echo indications may occur during 12 Procedure for determining the reflector size
the testing of castings: Preliminary remarks:
a) Echo indications of flaws Defined preconditions must be fulfilled (for exam-
b) Attentuations of the back wall echo which are not due ple, knowledge of the type of reflection point,
to the shape of casting or the coupling. simple geometry of the reflection point, optimal
impingement of the sound beam on the reflector) in
order to permit the determination of the reflection
dimensions by ultrasonic testing with an accury
suffcient for technical applications. These require-
Table 1 Recording levels for the ultrasonic testing of casting of ferritic steel
ments are usually not met in the case of steel Sound beam diameter of the used probe or if the distance
castings. Large casting defects can appear as is less than or equal to the sound beam diameter calcu-
serveral small recordable indications; the flaw lated with equation (1) for the measured sonic distance,
description can be improved by using additional the reflector is defined as “reflector without measurable
directions and angles of incidence. To simplify extension“. If the distance lies above the curve or the
and stand-ardize the procedure, the following value calculated with equation (1), the measured dimen-
agreements are made. sion has to be recorded.
12.1 Classification of the reflectors according
to their extension 12.3 Measuring the reflector dimensions per-
pendicular to the test surface
12.1.1 Reflectors without measurable extension It is recommended to use probes which have a sound
Reflectors are called reflectors without measurable exten- beam diameter as small as possible in the region of the
sion if their actual extension is less than or equal to the reflector (focal point of focussing probes or use of the
diameter of the sound beam of the probe used at the natural focus of TR angle beam probes).
location of the reflector, as specified, for example in the
Depending on the type of reflectory, the reflector dimen-
probe related data sheet or sonograms.
sions perpendicular to the test surface can be measured
The sound beam diameter (6-dB-drop) as a fuction of the
by
sonic distance are specified in Fig. 1 for the generally
used probes or can be calculated with the following - Perpendicular incidence from two opposite sides
equation: (Fig. 2) or
λ⋅S D⋅S - Oblique incidence.
DB(6dB) ≈ = (1) In case of oblique incidence, the depth extension of plane
D 4⋅N reflectors is determined by the difference of the sonic
where distances, measured on the reflector edges.
DB (6dB) Sound beam diameter (6 dB drop)
? Wave lenght The following procedure has been applied successfully
D Crystal diameter for estimating the depth extension of indications close to
S Sonic distance the surface up to a depth of about 50 mm.
N Near field lenght (N ˜ D2/4?) Using a TR angle beam probe (with roof angle, trans-
verse waves) the maximum echo of the depth dynamics
of the reflector to be measured is brought to 100 %
12.1.2 Reflectors with measurable extension screen height. By shifting the probe perpendicular to the
Reflectors are called reflectors with measurable exten- reflector, those points are to be located where the echo
sion if their actual dimension are greater than the sound height has decreased to 10 % of the screen height. The
beam diameter of the probe used at the location of the depth extension is calculated from the sonic distance S1
reflector. and S2 and the angle of incidence (Fig. 3).
Standards and other documents referred to Guidelines ultra sonic examination of weld joints
DIN 1690 part 2 (Obtainable from: Deutsche Gesellschaft für zerstörungs-
Technical delivery for castings of metallic materials; freie Prüfung e. V., Motardstraße 54, D-13629 Berlin)
classification of the quality of steel castings on the basis
of nondestructive tests.
DIN 54119 Previous edition:
Non-destructive testing; Ultrasonic inspection; terms SEP 1922: 8.75, 6.77
DIN 54120
Non-destructive testing; calibration block 1 and its use for
Modifications:
the adjustment and control of ultrasonic echo eqipment.
Compared with the edition 6.77 the following modi-
DIN 54122 fications were made:
Non-destructive testing; reference block 2 and its use for a) Extension of the scope of application to castings with
the adjustment and control of ultrasonic echo equipment. wall thickness up to 600 mm.
Stahl-Eisen-Lieferbedindungen 072 b) Modification of the recording levels for castings with
Ultrasonic tested heavy plate; technical delivery specifica- wall thickness between 100 mm and 150 mm.
tions. (Obtainable from: Verlag-Stahleisen mbH Postfach c) Stipulation of the requirements for the test personnel.
105164 D-40042 Düsseldorf) d) Stipulation of the surface quality requirements.
CTIF-341-02 e) Revision and amendmenrt of the pragraph dealing
Caractérisation d´état de surface de pièces en acier with the equipment, adjustment of the test instru-
moulé; Recommandation Technique du Bureau de ment, determination of the ultrasonic testability and
Normalisation des Industries de la Fonderie. (Obtainable performance of the test.
from: Editions Techniques des Industries de la Fonderie, f) Inclusion of regulations regarding to procedure for
12 avenue Raphael, F-75016 Paris) determining the size of reflectors.
g) Reference to DIN 1690 part 2 for evaluating echo
SNT-TC-1A indications.
Personnel Qualification and Certification in Non-destruc- h) Modification of part of the requirements regarding the
tive Testing (Obtainable from: ASNT American Soc. for content of the test report.
Nondestructive Testing, 1711 Arlington Lane, P O Box i) Adaptation of terms to DIN 54119.
28518, Columbus, OH 43228-0518, USA)
Crystal Near
Near field
fieldlength for
lenght for
Page 6 of 7
Ø5 2,11 4,22 -
Ø 10 4,22 8,0 15,6 -
Ø 24 22,7 45,0 88,0 115
8x9 10 20
20 x 22 75 150
1 1MHz / L Ø 10
2 2MHz / L Ø 10
3 1MHz / L Ø 24
4 2MHz / T 8 x 9
7 4MHz / T 8 x 9
8 2MHz / T 20 x 22
9 4MHz / L Ø 24
10 5MHz / L Ø 24
11 4MHz / T 20 x 22
Sonic distance s in mm
Fig 1 Approximate values of the near field length and the sound beam diameter (6 dB) in the far field of single probes
as a function of sonic distance. (For curves 4, 7, 8 and 11 of angle beam probes the smaller of the two axes of the
Steel Iron Test Sheet 1922 July 1985 Page 7 of 7
Echo height
a) Interrupted reflector
Echo height
b) Uninterrupted reflector
Fig 3 Measuring the depth extension of reflectors with measurable extension perpendicular to the test surface using
angle beam probes and characteristic forms of danymics: depth extension t = (s2 – s1) cos a