Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PREFACE
About This Edition v
Acknowledgments vii
Correspondence vii
TEST QUESTIONS
Chapter 1 An Overview of Financial Management 1
iii
Web Appendix 12D Techniques for Measuring Beta Risk 527
iv
PREFACE
1. We reviewed each question and problem carefully for writing style and
clarity, and this led to many significant improvements. The “quality” of
the writing in the test bank now matches that in the text itself.
3. The test bank is available in three forms: a paper book, a Word file, and
a computerized test bank (ExamView). The ExamView version is extremely
powerful yet easy to use, and it can algorithmically change the problems
and answers and thus generate a nearly unlimited number of versions of
each problem.1 For example, a capital budgeting problem might give
students information and require them to calculate an NPV. The
algorithmic generator would make a random change in a variable to create
as many versions as an instructor desires. This feature can virtually
eliminate the possibility of cheating, and it can also be used to develop
sample tests for student practice.2
4. The old test bank was heavily weighted toward relatively long and complex
problems. We added some more long problems, but mainly we added new and
shorter problems that a reasonably well-prepared student can work in 2 to
3 minutes. Again, the algorithmic generator can expand these problems
indefinitely.
5. In this test bank all questions have just one correct and four incorrect
answers. None of those annoying “a and b,” or “none of the above,” and
the like that confuse students and make them think “trick question.”
1 Note that the true/false and multiple-choice conceptual questions in the test bank do not have
this feature.
2 We wrote the test bank problems, used a financial calculator to get the answers, and then used
Excel to check the answers. Next, we specified ranges for the inputs in the algorithmic versions
and then sent everything off to be put into ExamView. A lot of programming was required to set
up the algorithmic procedure, and guess where this programming was actually done--Moscow! When
we heard this, we were afraid things would get lost in the translation. After we reviewed the
Russian programmers’ work, we started worrying about the U.S. holding its own in the world
economy. Our students need to keep their noses to the grindstone!
v
6. In the text we added, at the end of each major section, some
straightforward self-test questions and problems that deal with the
material in the section. These are in addition to the end-of-chapter
questions and problems. Previously, we avoided including problems in the
test bank that were similar in form and wording to those in the text—the
test bank problems covered the same material, but they looked different
and frequently required a different thought process. For example, in the
text we might give students some data and then require them to find the
days sales outstanding, while in the test bank we might give them the DSO
and ask them to determine the firm’s sales. Thus, many of the test bank
problems required students to transform the DSO equation and then use the
transformed version to answer the question. This is a good way to see
how well students understood the material, but it makes the problems
relatively difficult and different from what students saw in the text.
The test bank still contains some of these “convoluted” problems, but now
it now has a lot more straightforward and therefore easier problems.
vi
Unfortunately, the class size in the introductory course at Florida
rarely makes this feasible.
11. Several years ago we developed an Excel grading procedure that a number
of professors still use. The program automatically averages students’
grades, and it produces a weighted average (we generally weight the
midterms 30% each and the final 40%). This program also allows us to
specify a mean grade for each exam such that the grade distribution
results in a specified GPA. For example, if we want the class GPA to be
2.7, which at Florida is a C+, the model will produce that result. The
Excel program also makes it easy to sort by students’ grades to obtain a
listing of students in rank order and to sort by social security number
(or some other identifier) to post grades without names. Since other
instructors may find the model useful, we have included it in the
Instructors’ Section of the book’s web site.
Acknowledgments
First, we would like to thank Professor Jim Keys (Florida International
University) and others at the 2004 Southern Finance Association Conference at
Naples, Florida, who convinced us that the test bank needed a top-to-bottom
revision. Jim, Chris Buzzard, and Dana Clark then worked closely with us and
the Cengage people to set up the algorithmic versions of the problems. Also,
Professor Craig Tapley permitted us to use some of his old exam questions and
also gave us many insights into the examination process, especially in
classes with very large enrollments. In addition, Professor Oliver
Schnusenberg of the University of North Florida checked all of the problems
for accuracy and clarity. Susan Whitman took care of the massive typing job;
her care and dedication is much appreciated. Finally, we really appreciate
the work done by the Cengage Learning staff and the Russians who put our
problems into the algorithmic system. Whoever said it takes teamwork to
produce a good product surely knew what they were talking about!
Correspondence
We would very much appreciate hearing from test bank users--what difficulties
are you having, and what can we do to improve it? If you have any complaints
or suggestions, please let us hear from you.
Eugene F. Brigham
Joel F. Houston
October 2008
vii
AACSB Tags
viii