Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Analysis of Parco
Type of organization Manufacturing
Categories of employees Senior executive , line managers, mangers, Engineer and technical staff,
operating staff, Sales force
Existence of Hr department yes
Purpose of performance appraisal promotion, guide to job changes, salary decision, employee
development, supervisory understanding.
Performance appraisal approach comparison against standards, direct performance measure
Who does performance appraisal immediate supervisor
Feedback to employee about
resultsyes upto some extent
Methods of appraisal rating scale(personal trait and behavior scale, job dimension rating scale)
Problems organizational influence, personal biasness, difficult to set qualitative standard
Evaluation of performance appraisal
accuracy up to some extent
Reason for inaccurate evaluation subjective standard, rate error, negative communication
Analysis of Pakarab
Type of organization Manufacturing
Categories of employees executives, supervisors, workers
Existence of Hr department yes (personal administration for executive and supervisor, industry
relation department for workers)
Purpose of performance appraisal promotion, salary decision, employee development
Performance appraisal approach comparison against standards, interpersonal comparison
Who does performance appraisal immediate supervisor
Feedback to employee about results no
Methods of appraisal rating scale (job dimension rating scale, forced distribution)
Problems organizational influence, personal biasness, difficult to set qualitative standard
Evaluation of performance appraisal accuracy up to some extent
Reason for inaccurate evaluation rate error, negative communication
Comparison Of Performance Appraisal System
In Parco & Pakarab Fertilizers:
PARCO AND PAKARAB have the various similarities and dissimilarities in their performance
appraisal systems. These similarities and dissimilarities are the followings:
Similarities:
1.Both have the same nature of organizations (Manufacturing).
2.The organogram of both the organizations is same because of having same nature of job
Description.
3.Both have complex human resource structures, having more than 1500 employees.
4.To handle these complex human resource both have their HR departments which conducts the
formal appraising system.
5.Puroses of Performance appraisal are same in both the organizations.
Dissimilarities:
1.The main difference in their performance appraisal systems is feedback of results to
supervisors and employees. Parco communicates the results of employees to immediate
supervisors but in PAKARAB FERTILIZERS this is not done usually.
2.Thier are no formal training programs in PAKARAB as a result of performance appraisal but
PARCO has.
Findings & Recommendations:
In the light of the articles and our study in the organizations, we become able to suggest some
recommendations which are as follows:
1.They should convert the qualitative work into measurable quantitative factors so
that clear standards can be set for performance measurement.
2. They should apply MBO technique to check performance of those employees who are having
work assignments which can be quantified accurately.
3.They should apply 360 degree appraisal system so that appraisal biasness can be reduced to
the minimum level and to improve measurement accuracy.
For the application of 360 degree appraisal system, it requires cultural change in whole
organization.360 degree appraisal system should be used where investigation is required.
360 degree approach can measure the performance of an employee more effectively because this
approach involves getting feedback about an employee from a wide variety of sources in addition
to his or her manger.
4.For evaluation accuracy, skilled personnel should be appointed, for the evaluation of
measured performance, who have greater knowledge of descriptions of those jobs.
5. Post appraisal interviews should be conducted to give opportunity to employees for their
justification and to create motivation in them.