Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
ACKWNOWLEDGEMENT
This work would not have materialized but for the timely guidance given
by Miss Sasikala Devi, M.B.A, Lecturer, Department of Management
Studies who assisted and extended support through out the project.
2
CONTENTS
PAGE
CHAPTER NO CONTENTS
NO
1 INTRODUCTION 4
SYNOPSIS 4
INDUSTRY PROFILE 5
COMPANY PROFILE 8
2 OBJECTIVES 25
3 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 25
4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 29
5 LIMITATIONS 31
ANALYSIS &
6 INTERPERETATIONS 32
7 SUMMARY 46
FINDINGS 46
SUGGESTIONS 47
8 ANNEXURE 48
3
INTRODUCTION
SYNOPSIS
Employee Retention
4
INDUSTRY PROFILE
INDIAN MACHINE TOOLS INDUSTRY
BACKGROUND AND HISTORICAL TRENDS
The machine tools industry in Indian dates back to the world back to
the Second World War. Due to non availability of imported machine tools, a
few British owned general engineering firms took up their manufacturing in
India. This was followed up by start of industrialization in the series of Five
year plans. The process of planning in the economy resulted in a second
phase of machine tools with public sector investment in Machine Tools
(HMT Ltd .1953. These two initial phase of development of Indian Machine
Tool industry saw the production of general purpose machine tools most of
which were produced under technical assistance from Foreign Collaborators
(Loudon, Ward, Herbert, Jones and Shipman, etc)
The 1960 marked the third phase of Machine Tool Industry. During
this phase, the range of product witnessed rapid, growth and various types of
machine tools including SPMs were manufactured(Multi Spindle Automats,
Gear cutting machine, SPMs, presses ,Broaching Machines, etc.).The Fourth
phase begins in the mid 1980s which saw the entry of Japanese Machine
Tools makers in the Indian Market though licensing agreements. (Mori
Seiki, Hitachi Seiki, Nachi fuji-koshi, Mit subshi, etc.
The Fifth and current phase began in the early nineties after the
liberalization of the Indian Economy. With the market share of bigger
companies expanding and the public sector giants shrinking and those of the
smaller company rising, in house design capability, entrepreneurial spirit,
5
greater technology freedliness, operational flexibility and lean management,
combined to give a greater competitive edge to the smaller companies setup
by technocrats resulting in a significant shift in machine tools production to
these medium sized companies.
International Trends
While Japan increased its lead over Germany Taiwan
edged part of United States to be among the top five machine tools
manufacturing countries. Italy and China remain in the Second and Third
slot.
Current Status in India
The Indian Machine Tools industry manufactures almost
the complete range of metal cutting and metal forming machine tools.
Customized in nature, the products from the Indian market comprise
conventional machine tool as well as Computer Numerically Controlled
(CNC) machines. Others include special purpose machines, robotics,
handling systems, and TPM-friendly machines.
Efforts with the Industry are now undergoing the
features of CNC machines, and provide further value additions at lower
costs, to meet specific requirement of users.
In India there are about 450 manufacturing complete
machines or their components. There are 150 in the organized sector. Almost
73% of the total machine tool production in India contributed by 10 major
companies in this industry. The industry has an installed capacity of over Rs
10 million and employees a workforce directly and indirectly totaling 65000
skilled and unskilled persons.
The hub of manufacturing activities concentrated in Mumbai and
Pune in Maharashtra, Chennai, Gujarat, Coimbatore, etc. All global leaders
6
namely, Makino, DGM, Yamazaki, Haus, Trumpf Daewoo, Schules are
present in India either through marketing agents, technical centers, service
centers or assembly centers.
These are critical issues to this industry.
It is well known and often repeated fact that the machine tools
industry forms the pillar for the competitiveness of the entire manufacturing
sector since machine tools which in turn produce the manufacturing goods.
Hence being an integral sector, growth of the machine tools industry has an
immense bearing on the entire manufacturing industry which is crucial for
country’s strategic requirement like Railway, Defense, Space and atomic
space.
7
COMPANY PROFILE
HISTORY OF THE COMPANY
By the end of the Second World War, the Government of India was
confronted by a big problem of disposing the colossal war waste. Ultimately
a committee was constituted to enquire into the possibilities. The committee
report of 1948 proposed the establishment of a Government owned machine
tool industry. This was expected to fulfill two aspects. The first was being
utilization of the Rs 4000 Million worth of metallic waste. The second was
the incorporation of state owned infrastructure manufacturing facility. The
result was the birth of the HINDUSTAN MACHINE TOOLS LIMITED,
which diversified in due course of time to the present stature of the multi
core, multi location, multi unit, multi product, industrial gaint HMT Ltd.
The HMT Ltd was started as a single factory to produce Tool room
Lathes at Bangalore in collaboration with M/s Oerlikon of Switzerland in
1953, with a capacity to manufacture around 400 machines per year. Since
then different Collaborations, continued in house R & D and tremendous
marketing efforts brought HMT, to present in status.
The growth of HMT was characterized by backward and forward
integration of technology and product diversification. Thus, the company
that started with manufacturing and selling lathes expanded its machine tools
product range to evolve as the ultimate solution in metal cutting. The
product diversification efforts took the company to the business of watches
8
in 1962, Tractors in 1972, presses in 1972 Lamps and Lamp making
machinery in 1980, CNC system in 1986, Ball screw in 1986 and
Reconditioning in 1990.
The multi product activities made HMT Ltd changes its identity as
Hindustan machine tools Ltd. Today, HMT Ltd. has 22 product divisions,
spread through the length and breadth of India. A subsidiary namely HMT
(international) Ltd, undertakes the exports to several other Indian companies.
HMT Ltd was restructured in 1992 to facilitate
better administration of the multi product business activities. Accordingly,
the following business groups were established.
9
• Praga tools Ltd. which manufactures machine tools.
• HMT Bearing Ltd. which manufactures precision Bearing in
collaboration with m/s Koyo Japan.
As per the revival of this public sector Industry a turnaround plan has
introduced in the early days of this millennium and recognized as HMT Ltd
–holding company including Tractors division and presently comprises of
the following subsidiaries.
1. HMT MACHINE TOOLS LIMITED
10
Heavy Duty Lathe.
PINJORE
KALAMASSERY
11
CNC Turning centre.
Turn Mill Centre.
Flexible Turning Cell.
Copying Lathes.
Centre Lathes.
Offset Printing Machines.
Paper Cutting Machines.
HYDERABAD
12
MAJOR MACHINES AND INSPECTION FACILITY AVAILABLE IN
DIFFERENT MACHINE TOOLS UNITS
13
HMT CHINAR WATCHES LTD is also one of the subsidiaries
engaged in the manufacture of Chinar model watches located in Srinagar,
Kashmir State.
PRODUCT PROFILE
THE KALAMASSERY COMPLEX OF HMT, KALAMASSERY.
14
The Kalamassery Unit, the Forth Machine Tools Ltd was established in
1963 and started production in 1964. The Unit originally manufactured only
two types of Lathes namely, H&LB, but later added special purpose Lathes
like Copying and Turret. Lathes. Model LT-20 was the first product to be
indigenously developed by the unit (1968) and the development of this
product was a landmark in the history of the unit. The production of this
machine was later licensed to M/s QETCOS Kerala, MATOOLS,
Philippines, Ceylon steel corporation Srilanka. The original Centre Lathes H
& Lb were then replaced by a new family of unified series of lathes which
was designed and developed by the unit, incorporating the concept of
typification, standardization and unification.
15
1992-93 STC 20
1993-94 STC 20
1994-95 NL 180
1996-97 TS 20 (Tcom Spindle)
1997-98 AUTOCOMP
1997-98 STALLION-200
1999-2000 AUTOMAN
2000-01 STALLION-100
2003 M CELL
2004 SMC WITH GANTORY LODER
2004 STALLION 100s
2007 MEGATURN.
16
THE CURRENT PRODUCT RANGE
PRODUCT MODEL
OFFSET PRINTING MACHINES SOM 436
SOM 425
SOM 236
SOM 231
SOM 225
SOM 136
SOM 131
SOM 125G
PG-92 D3
17
Both the divisions have been awarded ISO 9001 certification by
IRQS
The manufacturing shops at MTK are supplied by various
infrastructural facilities like, High Technology CNC Centers, Testing
facilities, Foundry ,Heat Treatment, Computer system CAD system etc.
Around 800 well experienced form the human resources of the unit keeping
in line with the current corporate trends.
TRAINING CENTRE
This Unit views HRD as one of the concern to increase productivity and
enhance Social Stranding. The company has a well established training
system by personnel of technical and management skills.
The HRD undertaken by them includes the following:-
1. Management Orientation Programmes
18
THE MARKETING NETWORK OF HMT MTL Ltd.
1. Okuma, Japan.
2. Nori saiki. Co. Ltd Japan.
3. Tukisama, Japan.
4. Muzak, Japan.
5. Ikegai, Japan.
6. GDM, Germany.
7. Churchill, England.
8. Ernault Toyota, Japan.
19
9. Victor, Taiwan.
10.Tuma, Korea.
11.EMAS, Germany.
20
product is manufactured consistently with in a system that conforms at least
two internationally acceptable standards.
IN ADDITION, ISO 9000 SERIES STANDARD ALSO:-
Motivates Exporters..
21
Kalamassery unit
The kalamassery Unit was commissioned on October 2nd 1964 with an
initial investment of Rs 7.5 crores in Ernakulum district near the Cochin Port
.The total plot of the unit was 1150 acres. It is the second unit and fourth
division of HMT Company. The kalamassery unit started with machine tool
division since 1965. Then Printing machinery division with additional
investment of Rs 3.3 crores .In 1994 the company earned ISO 9001
certificate.
Welfare facilities
1. HMT School
2. SBT Branch
3. Bharath Gas supply unit (only for employees)
22
3. To globalize our operation by developing a mix of international
markets and business.
4. To ensure a satisfactory return on capital employed to meet the
growth needs and aspiration of our share holders.
5. To present an active and pleasant working environment.
Company Mission
“Quality, Reliability & commitment “is the main mission of the company
.HMT machines are designed to meet the functional requirements so as to
give “maximum customer satisfaction”.
1. To establish as one of the world premier companies in the engineering
field having strong international competitiveness.
Vision
To be a leading global engineering conglomerate focused on
customers delight in our fields of endeavors.
23
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
24
25
COMPANY STRUCTURE
HMT LTD
HMT
HMT INTERNATIONA HMT BERINGS,
WATCHES LTD L HYDERABAD
LTD.BANGLORE
HMT MTL
HMT CHINNAR
WATCHES,
KASHMIR PRAGA TOOLS LTD,
FACTORIES HYDERABAD
KALAMASSE HYDERABA
BANGLORE AJMIR PINJORE
RY D
26
OBJECTIVES
27
1) Employers have a need to keep employees from leaving and going to
work for other companies. This is true because of the great costs associated
with hiring and retraining new employees. The best way to retain employees
is by providing them with job satisfaction and opportunities for advancement
in their careers (Eskildesen 2000, Hammer 2000).
2) Employees that are satisfied and happy in with their jobs are more
dedicated in doing a good job and taking care of customers that sustain the
operation. Job satisfaction is something that working people seek and a key
element of employee retention (Marini 2000; Denton 2000).
4) The employees are extremely crucial to the organisation since their value
to the organization is essentially intangible and not easily replicated
Meaghan et al. (2002). Therefore, managers must recognize that employees
as major contributors to the efficient achievement of the organization’s
success (Abbasi et al. (2000)).
28
7) Workforce optimization, the organisation’s success in optimizing the
performance of the employees by establishing essential processes for getting
work done, providing good working conditions, establishing accountability
and making good hiring choices would retain employees in their
organisation. (Badawy, 1988; Basta and Johnson, 1989; Garden, 1989;
Parden, 1981; Sherman, 1986).
14) Retaining talent is difficult but not impossible. The employees and
supervisors are required enough to sensitize the reasons as why do
employees quit the organizations and what makes them motivated to stick to
them. There is end number of reasons for driving people out of their jobs.
29
But if the employees and supervisors smartly sensitize to the issues related
to employee attrition and devise retention strategies judiciously the talented
employees can be retained.(Dr S R Chary, Prof Harish Kumar)
15) Retention experts agree that businesses can keep the talented people they
have worked hard to secure, and don't have to spend a lot of money to do so.
"It is not about having to pay exorbitant salaries," says Daniel Dixon of
Consolidated-Products. "It's about creating a vested interest for employees
and that can be done with simple creativity and a little effort."
REFERENCES
30
2) Badawy MK (1988). "What we’ve learned about managing human
resources in R&D in the last fifty years", Res. Technol.Manage. 31(5):
pp.19-35.
12) “Development of the job diagnostic survey” J. Appl. Psychol. 60: 159-
70.
31
14) By Boyens, John ,Publication: Franchising World
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH DESIGN.
1) Exploratory
2) Descriptive
3) Diagnostic
4) Experimentation
DATA COLLECTION
Data collection method is the integral part of research design. There are
several data collection methods, each with its own advantages and
disadvantages. Data can be collected in a variety of ways in different
settings from different sources. The data are classified into two categories,
primary and secondary data.
32
PRIMARY DATA
Primary data refer to information obtained first hand by the researcher. In
this study the researcher used interview method by using structured
questionnaires, telephone interviews for collecting the primary data. Here
Primary data was collected through questionnaires.
SECONDARY DATA
Secondary data can be obtained from the publications, industry analysis
offered by the websites, internet and so on. In this survey the secondary data
collected from the journals, books & from HMT Machine Tools Ltd,
Kalamassery.
TARGET GROUP
Employees of HMT Machine Tools Ltd are the target group for this study.
SAMPLE SIZE
The sample size taken was 100 employees of HMT Machine Tools Ltd,
Kalamassery.
SAMPLING EXTENT
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
33
organization and from the faculty of Department of Management Studies
that made it more effective.
RESEARCH TOOLS
In spite of all the limitations maximum care and effort were taken to make
the study scientific and meaningful.
34
ANALYSIS AND INTERPETATION
The data analysis and interpretations were done from the following data
collected from the employees.
NO OF PERCENTAGE
AGE
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
BELOW 30 0 0
30-40 0 0
40-50 43 43
50-60 57 57
AGE OF EMPLOYEES
60
NO OF RESPONDENTS
50
40 NO OF RESPONDENTS
30
PERCENTAGE
20 ANALYSIS
10
0
BELOW 30-40 40-50 50-60
30
AGE
From the above data 57% of employees are aged between 50 and 60, 43% of
employees are aged between 40 and 50 and others are zero.
35
EXPERIENCE IN THE ORGANISATION
NO OF PERCENTAGE
YEARS
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
BELOW
5 0 0
5 to 10 0 0
10 to 15 6 6
15 to 20 83 83
ABOVE
20 11 11
90
NO OF RESPONDENTS
80
70
60 NO OF RESPONDENTS
50
40 PERCENTAGE
30 ANALYSIS
20
10
0
BELOW 5 to 10 10 to 15 15 to 20 ABOVE
5 20
YEARS
From the above data 11% of employees have experience more than20 years,
83% of employees have experience between 15 and 20 years, 6% of
employees have experience between 10 and 15 and others are zero.
36
RATE OF MONETARY BENEFITS IN THE ORGANISATION
NO OF PERCENTAGE
RATING
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
VERY
GOOD 6 6
GOOD 20 20
BAD 51 51
VERY BAD 23 23
60
NO OF RESPONDENTS
50
40 NO OF RESPONDENTS
30
PERCENTAGE
20 ANALYSIS
10
0
VERY GOOD BAD VERY
GOOD BAD
RATING
51% of employees said that the monetary benefits in the organization is bad,
23% of employees rated monetary benefits in the organization as very bad,
20% rated as good and only 6% rated the monetary benefits in the
organization as very good.
37
RATE OF ADDITIONAL BENEFITS
NO OF PERCENTAGE
ADDITIONAL BENEFITS
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
TRANSPORTATION
ALLOWANCE 29 29
IMPROVEMENT IN
TOWNSHIP 6 6
TRAINING IN OTHER
INSTITUTIONS 17 17
CANTEEN- FOOD
VARIETY 8 8
MEDICAL- ACCIDIENT
INSURANCE 40 40
45
40
35 NO OF RESPONDENTS
30
25
20 PERCENTAGE
15
10 ANALYSIS
5
0
INSTITUTIONS
TRANSPORTATIO
INSURANCE
ACCIDIENT
TRAINING IN
MEDICAL-
N ALLOWANCE
OTHER
ADDITIONAL BENEFITS
38
40% rated accident insurance as most important additional benefit required,
29% for transportation allowance, 17% for training in other institutions, 8%
for canteen food variety and 6% for improvement in township.
NO OF PERCENTAGE
REASONS
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL PROBLEMS 51 51
STRESS 6 6
BETTER EMPLOYMENT
OPPURTUNITY 29 29
STAGNATION 14 14
60
50 NO OF RESPONDENTS
40
30
20 PERCENTAGE
10 ANALYSIS
0
OPPURTUNITY
EMPLOYEMEN
PROBLEMS
FINANCIAL
BETTER
REASONS
39
51% rated financial problem as the major reason for leaving the
organization, 6% rated stress, 29% rated better employment opportunity and
14% rated stagnation as the major reason.
NO OF PERCENTAGE
RATING
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
STRONGLY
AGREE 6 6
AGREE 38 38
NEUTRAL 4 4
DISAGREE 44 44
STRONGLY
DISAGREE 8 8
50
NO OF RESPONDENTS
45
40
35
30 NO OF RESPONDENTS
25
20 PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
15
10
5
0
STRONGLY NEUTRAL STRONGLY
AGREE DISAGREE
RATING
40
38% agreed that positive motivational activities will increase retention, 44%
disagreed, 8% strongly disagreed, 4% rated as neutral and only 6% strongly
agreed to this point.
50
45
NO OF RESPONDENTS
40
35
30
NO OF RESPONDENTS
25
PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
20
15
10
5
0
VERY GOOD GOOD BAD VERY BAD
RATING
45% rated welfare schemes as good, 23% as bad, 26% as very bad and 6%
rated as very good.
41
RATE OR ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
NO OF PERCENTAGE
RATING
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
STRONGLY AGREE 17 17
AGREE 46 46
NEUTRAL 23 23
DISAGREE 8 8
STRONGLYDISAGREE 6 6
50
45
40
35
30 NO OF RESPONDENTS
25
20 PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
15
10
5
0
STRONGLYDIS
NEUTRAL
STRONGLY
DISAGREE
AGREE
AGREE
AGREE
RATING
42
17% strongly agreed that proper ventilation, job shifts are provided to them.
46% agreed, 8% disagreed, 6% strongly disagreed and 23% said it as
neutral.
NO OF PERCENTAGE
RATING
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
STRONGLY AGREE 8 8
AGREE 17 17
NEUTRAL 20 20
DISAGREE 43 43
STRONGLY
DISAGREE 12 12
NO OF RESPONDENTS
12% 8%
43
8% of employees strongly agreed that safety is provided to them.
17% agreed, 20% said it as neutral, 43% disagreed and 12%
strongly disagreed.
NO OF PERCENTAGE
RATING
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
STRONGLY
AGREE 11 11
AGREE 51 51
NEUTRAL 19 19
DISAGREE 11 11
STRONGLY
DISAGREE 8 8
NO OF RESPONDENTS
8% 11%
11%
19%
51%
44
8% of employees strongly disagreed that necessary work
equipment are provided to them. 51% agreed, 19% said it as
neutral, 11% disagreed and 11% strongly agreed.
NO OF PERCENTAGE
RATING
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
STRONGLY AGREE 14 14
AGREE 43 43
NEUTRAL 23 23
DISAGREE 14 14
STRONGLY
DISAGREE 6 6
NO OF RESPONDENTS
6% 14%
14%
23%
43%
45
6% of employees strongly disagreed that enough opportunities are
provided to them. 43% agreed, 23% said it as neutral, 14%
disagreed and 14% strongly agreed.
NO OF PERCENTAGE
RATING
RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
STRONGLY
AGREE 11 11
AGREE 14 14
NEUTRAL 57 57
DISAGREE 12 12
STRONGLY
DISAGREE 6 6
60
NO OF RESPONDENTS
50
40
NO OF RESPONDENTS
30
PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
20
10
0
E
E
AL
E
RE
RE
RE
RE
R
UT
G
AG
AG
AG
A
NE
IS
S
LY
DI
D
G
LY
N
RO
G
N
ST
RO
ST
RATING
46
6% of employees strongly disagreed that employee’s opinion are
considered by the organization. 14% agreed, 57% said it as
neutral, 12% disagreed and 11% strongly agreed.
53
52
NO OF RESPONDENTS
51
50 YES
49 NO
48
47
46
NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
RATING
52% of employees said that right jobs are given to right person whereas 48%
said that right jobs are not given to right person.
47
FEEL AT ANY TIME TO LEAVE THE ORGANISATION
PERCENTAGE
RATING NO OF RESPONDENTS ANALYSIS
YES 34 34
NO 66 66
70
60
NO OF RESPONDENTS
50
40 YES
30 NO
20
10
0
NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
RATING
48
66% of employees think not to leave the organization whereas others think
differently.
SUMMARY
FINDINGS
49
SUGGESTIONS
50
ANNEXURE
QUESTIONNAIRE
1) Designation-----------------------------
2) Department-----------------------------
4) Your age
a) Below 30 b) 30-40 c) 40-50 d) 50-60
51
5) Years of experience in BIG BAZAAR?
a) Below 5 years b) 5-10 years c) 10-15 years d) 15-20years
7) Do you agree that additional benefits other than salary will prevent you from
leaving the organization?
a) Yes b) No
a) Transportation allowance
b) An improvement in township
c) Training in other institutions
d) Canteen- Food variety
e) Medical facilities- accident insurance
9) Grade according to your opinion the reasons that make you to leave the
Organization
*(Grade as 1,2,3,4,5. eg 1- Highly preffered , 2 for the one which you think is less
Preferable when compared to1.)
a) Financial problems
b) Stress
c) Better employment opportunity
d) Stagnation
12)
52
ENVIRONMENTA STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
L FACTORS AGREEE DISAGREE
a) Enough space,
ventilation, job shifts
are given to you
b) Good safety
measures are there in
the organization
13)
JOB STRONGLY AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
SATISFACTION AGREE DISAGREE
a) Do you have
the materials and
equipment that
you need in order
to do your work
rightly?
b) At work do
you have the
opportunity to do
what you do best
everyday?
c) At work do
your opinions
seems to be
counted?
14) Do you think higher authorities are giving right jobs to right person?
a) Yes b) No
53
54