Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Mulveys theory
The cinematic apparatus is not gender neutral The look in classical narrative cinema is almost always marked as male. Film viewers regardless of their gender are treated (and hence re-constructed) as masculine subjects. The spectator looks, the camera looks, the male characters look, and the female character is looked at. This sets into motion a series of unconscious psychological mechanisms which construct the film spectator as a gendered subject male.
Mulveys theory
The masculine subject (spectator) emerges from two scopophillic processes working in tandem Voyeuristic objectification of female characters Narcissistic identification with male characters The female character functions as an object of desire sexualised.
Mulveys theory
Male Active Female Passive
This is graphically depicted in films through: A series of eye-line matches (close-up shots of the male character looking), intercut with shots of the female characters body (a bit of leg, bum wiggling as she walks, her breasts etc.) The eye-line matches work to signify the notion that the male character is looking at the female and desiring her.
Mulveys theory
Female also signifies threat of castration to male character/spectator. To resolve this: The object of the gaze is made responsible for the character/spectators anxiety punished (sadistic) The object of the gaze is turned into a fetish object a spectacle. Neither option allows for the depiction of the female as a subject in her own right.
Shortcomings
While Mulveys theory is compelling in a lot of instances her theory is too deterministic, for example: Some disagree that female film viewers identify with the male gaze (Jackie Stacey). What happens if the protagonist is female? What happens when the male character is made the object of desire?
Shortcomings
Are all films structured around the male gaze and do we always accept the invitation? Laura Mulveys assertion that we do, implies that the spectator is passive, however others argue that film viewers are more active and can engage and read a film in a variety of ways (Queer Theory, Stacey).
Shortcomings
Gendered approaches to cinema have been the first to examine the experiences of the female audience member. This means focussing on the audience and their varied viewing positions as much as it means focussing on the audience itself. It is recognised in gender theory that the female audience is not a homogenous mass, but infinitely varied.
Shortcomings
The way a woman (or man) reads a potentially polysemic text will depend on variables such as her education, social status in fact responses to cinema are so infinitely varied that it is difficult to create a coherent academic approach.
To illustrate in a moment I will ask to watch a scene from the Piano and ask you to describe your feelings towards it.
Films protagonist is female Are we then positioned to identify with the female gender? Are we constructed as a feminine audience?
Scenes depict male characters as the object of desire female gaze Campion consciously uses the gaze male & female to demonstrate how people are objectified through it people watching people holder of the gaze having power (links to patriarchy / colonization).
No contemporary Western images of feminine style and beauty. Women are seen to vomit and urinate in Campions films she wishes to unmask sexuality. Adas clothing is constrictive symbol for her confinement under patriarchy?
Campion investigates male sexuality driven by a desire to liberate men along with women. She undresses her men leaving them naked and exposed, vulnerable and open to rejection and the desires of women
By rejecting the male gaze as the dominant gaze she breaks the hypnotic spell of the female image and challenges the spectator to identify with her female characters, to watch from an involved and close distance rather than to immerse and lose themselves in the spectacle.