Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ASSIGNMENT # 2 SUBMITED TO: Javiad Iqbal Banday SUBMITTED BY: TOUFEEQ QAYYUM
LAW OF TORTS
DEFINITION OF TORT
According to Salmond, a tort may be defined as, a civil wrong for which the remedy is a common law action for unliquidated damages, and which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of a trust or other merely equitable obligation. According to Underhill tort may be defined as, A wrong independent of contract and resulting, (a) In the infringement of some absolute right to which another is entitled; (b) In the infringement of some qualified right of another causing actual damage; (c) In the infringement of some public right causing some special damage to an individual.
1. Absolute Right
A man has absolute right to his property, to the immunity of his person (reputation), to his liberty and security. An infringement of such a right is actionable per se, i.e., without proof of any special damage. Thus trespass to property or person is punishable even though no actual damage has occurred. False imprisonment for short period is an example. Also mental shock affords as much a ground for action as a limb broken.
2. Qualified Right
A qualified right means a right to be preserved from damage by certain actions or omissions of other persons. It is a right to be saved from infringement from others and no action will lie without proof of actual damages. Instances of the infringement of qualified rights are fraud or deceit, negligence, malicious prosecution, nuisance, etc. In all these cases damage is an essential part of the causes of action.
3. Public Rights
A public right means a right that all men enjoy in common. Thus a right of using the highway is a public right. No action will lie for infringement of such a right unless the plaintiff has suffered some substantial or particular damage beyond that which is suffered by the public.
INJURIA SINE DAMNUM; DAMNUM SINE INJURIAINJURIA SINE DAMNUM; DAMNUM SINE INJURIA
These two maxims illustrate the real significance of legal damage. By damnum is meant damage in the sense of substantial loss of money, comfort, health, or the like. By injuria is meant an unauthorized interference, however trivial, with some right conferred by law on the plaintiff.
INTENTIONAL
Bad actors are liable for punitive damages Intention is important for five main torts of assault, battery, trespass to land, trespass to chattels, conversion, and false imprisonment. Intent to commit one intentional tort is transferable to another tort (e.g., assault to battery) as well as to another person (intended to hit one person and hit another).
Assault:
The term assault encompasses a threatened or attempted physical attack against an individual by a person who appears to have the ability to cause bodily harm.
Battery:
Battery is a criminal offense which involves unlawful physical contact.
Trespass Land:
Trespass to land involves the "wrongful interference with one's possessory rights in (real) property.
Trespass to chattels:
Trespass to chattels, also known as trespass to goods or trespass to personal property, is defined as "an intentional interference with the possession of personal property proximately cause injury."
Conversion:
A conversion is a voluntary act by one person inconsistent with the ownership rights of another.
False imprisonment:
False imprisonment is the intentional, unlawful, and unconsented restraint by one person of the physical liberty of another.
NEGLIGENCE
Negligence is generally defined as the failure to use ordinary care. A person fails to use ordinary care if he/she does something that a person of ordinary prudence would not have done under the same or similar circumstances. Failure to use ordinary care can also occur by omission, or failing to do something, which a person of ordinary prudence would have done under the same or similar circumstances. Negligence, then, is a judgment of both acts and omissions. Consider, for example, a car wreck case. The drivers involved can be found negligent for doing what they should have not done, e.g., driving too fast or driving on the wrong side of the road; or, they may be found negligent
for failing to act, e.g., failing to slow down, failing to stop, or failing to drive on the proper side of the road. Whether the conduct is described in terms of acts or omissions, the conduct is judged against a standard of ordinary care.
STRICT LIABILITY
Some persons or companies are strictly liable for certain activities that harm others, even when they have not acted negligently or with wrongful intent. Persons or companies engaged in blasting, storing dangerous, toxic substances or keeping dangerous animals, for example, could be strictly liable for harm caused to others. The theory behind imposing strict liability on the part of those conducting such activities is that these activities pose an undue risk of harm to members of the community. Thus, anyone who conducts that activity does so at his own risk and is liable when something goes wrong--even innocently-and someone is harmed. The people who posed the risk are in the best position to pay for it. Holding manufacturers liable for injuries their products cause is a good example of strict liability.
2. 3. 4. 5.
Abnormal dangerous activity: spurious drugs Animals: keeping wild animals Defective products OR product liability Concept of Warranty
Vicarious liability
Vicarious liability is an injury to a person who did not cause the injury but who has a particular legal relationship to the person who did act negligently.
Defamation
Defamation is an injury to the reputation or character of someone resulting from the false statements or actions of another his friends, colleagues, relatives and general public. Defamation have tow types Libel and Slander. 1. Libel is a term describing visual defamation, usually in the form of lies in print, or misleading or deceptive photographs. 2. Slander is a term describing defamation that you hear, not see, usually in the form of someone talking trash about you or spreading or repeating lies and unfounded rumor.
NUISANCE
All acts which adversely affect the physical abilities of an average person are attributed to nuisance.
Types of Nuisance Private Nuisance Private nuisance is the thing or activity which substantially and unreasonably interferes with plaintiffs use and enjoyment of his rights, e.g., health, safety etc. Public Nuisance Public nuisance is an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public, e.g., public health, public safety, public comfort, public convenience etc.
Defences in Torts
Act of God, Mistake, Consent, Contributory negligence, assumption of risk, Last clear chance, Self-defence, Truth, Fare Comment, privilege.