Alinear Symbolic Logic By Anthony J. Fejfar, B.A., J.D., M.B.A., Phd. Copyright and (P)Patent (2011C.E.) by Anthony J.

Fejfar and Neothomism, P.C. and The American People as a Public Domain Copyright and Patent. Consider the following Symbolic Logic Proof: 1. Assume A and or B pertains. 2. From 1 derive A 3. From 1 derive B 4. From 1 derive A and B 5. From 1 derive A or B However, it can also be argued that you cannot have (A and or B) in the same time and in the same place because this involves a logical contradiction. Thus, the syllogism (A and or B) is considered illegal move in purely analytical symbolic logic systems, and can only be used on equitable exception in such systems as practical logic. Thus, in a practical logic system Consider the following:

1. Assume A and or not A 2. From 1 derive A 3. From 1 derive not A 4. From 2 and 3 derive (A and not A) (a probabilistic logic move) since A and not A, by definition, and concrete logic, and analogical logic, A and not A (Apple and not Apple) cannot exist in the same time and in the same place. 5. From 4 derive relative A and relative not A, or, probable A and probable not A, or, 99.99999% A and 99.9999% B 6. From 5 derive the reasonable conclusion that logic can be alinear or probabilistic as confirmed by Calculus and Quantum Physics.