Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • Criteria For Project Evlauation MSRT 421 Ethics

    Hochgeladen von

    api-3709645
    3 Ansichten1 Seite
    QUALITY OF WORK Scientific quality is excellent.100% Scientific quality is good.80% Scientific quality is acceptable..65% Scientific quality is bellow average.50% Attained Mark 2. INVOLVEMENT OF EACH STUDENT Maximum involvement. 100% acceptable involvement.70% Minimum involvement.40% involvement includes actual participation in project activity AND discussion with course instructor.

    Originalbeschreibung:

    Originaltitel

    Criteria for Project Evlauation MSRT 421 Ethics

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Verfügbare Formate

    DOC, PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    QUALITY OF WORK Scientific quality is excellent.100% Scientific quality is good.80% Scientific quality is acceptable..65% Scientific quality is bellow average.50% Attained Mark 2. INVOLVEMENT OF EACH STUDENT Maximum involvement. 100% acceptable involvement.70% Minimum involvement.40% involvement includes actual participation in project activity AND discussion with course instructor.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    3 Ansichten1 Seite

    Criteria For Project Evlauation MSRT 421 Ethics

    Hochgeladen von

    api-3709645
    QUALITY OF WORK Scientific quality is excellent.100% Scientific quality is good.80% Scientific quality is acceptable..65% Scientific quality is bellow average.50% Attained Mark 2. INVOLVEMENT OF EACH STUDENT Maximum involvement. 100% acceptable involvement.70% Minimum involvement.40% involvement includes actual participation in project activity AND discussion with course instructor.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 1

    King Faisal University

    College of Applied Medical Sciences


    Respiratory Care Department

    MSRT412: Professional Ethics in Respiratory Care

    CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING TERM PROJECT & PRESENTATION

    Student’s Name: ……………………………………………… Date:…………………

    1. QUALITY OF WORK 10
    Scientific quality is excellent …...…………………..100%
    Scientific quality is good ………………………….…80%
    Scientific quality is acceptable…………………… …65%
    Scientific quality is bellow average……………….….50%
    Attained Mark

    2. INVOLVEMENT OF EACH STUDENT 5


    Maximum involvement ………………….…..….…. 100%
    Acceptable involvement………………………..…....70%
    Minimum involvement ……………………….….… 40%
    Involvement includes actual participation in project activity AND discussion of the project
    with course instructor.
    Attained Mark

    3. PRESENTATION 5
    Content is adequate…………… 40%
    Performance………………..….. 20%
    Response to questions . . ….… . .20%
    Interaction with audience . . ..…. 20%
    Attained % Attained Mark

    TOAL MRAK out of 20

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen