0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
6K Ansichten9 Seiten
Dr. John Olney is one of the most renowned neuroscientists in the
world today and tried to prevent the approval of aspartame. He did
studies on the aspartic acid in aspartame and found it caused lesions
in the brains of mice. He founded the field of neuroscience called
Excitotoxicity. Dr. Russell Blaylock, wrote the book on
it: Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, www.russellblaylockmd.com
This is his report to the Board of Inquiry telling them what would
happen to the brains of our children if it was
approved. http://www.wnho.net/dr_olney1.doc Unfortunately, the
prophecy has been fulfilled.
Dr. Olney realized with MSG already on the market, the addiction of
aspartame, with 40% of the molecule being aspartic, an excitotoxin,
it would be double trouble. Read his letter. Today our children are
medicated instead of educated.
Here is a case where the FDA attempted to have the manufacturer
indicted for fraud. Both US Prosecutors hired on with the defense
team and the statute of limitations expired. Then the FDA revoked
the petition for approval. You would then think the FDA had the
upper hand. Through the efforts of Don Rumsfeld who was CEO of
Searle at the time, an FDA commissioner was appointed to over-rule
the Board of Inquiry, and a U.S. President actually wrote an
executive order making the FDA powerless of do anything about
aspartame until they got Hayes to FDA to do this deadly deed. Here we
have the case where world renowned researchers and physicians tried
to stop the approval of what they already know was poison and did not
succeed.
So as poisons continue to be FDA approved what reliance does the
public have of safety? None. However, the FDA has had the
opportunity many times to ban the product and didn't have the courage
to do so. As FDA toxicologist Dr. Adrian Gross told Congress, "And
if the FDA violates it own law who is left to protect the public?
There is no one, the reason Mission Possible International exists, as
a warning to the public on this issue.
Betty
www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com and www.wnho.net
Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
DR Betty Martini ,D.Hum
Dr. John Olney is one of the most renowned neuroscientists in the
world today and tried to prevent the approval of aspartame. He did
studies on the aspartic acid in aspartame and found it caused lesions
in the brains of mice. He founded the field of neuroscience called
Excitotoxicity. Dr. Russell Blaylock, wrote the book on
it: Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, www.russellblaylockmd.com
This is his report to the Board of Inquiry telling them what would
happen to the brains of our children if it was
approved. http://www.wnho.net/dr_olney1.doc Unfortunately, the
prophecy has been fulfilled.
Dr. Olney realized with MSG already on the market, the addiction of
aspartame, with 40% of the molecule being aspartic, an excitotoxin,
it would be double trouble. Read his letter. Today our children are
medicated instead of educated.
Here is a case where the FDA attempted to have the manufacturer
indicted for fraud. Both US Prosecutors hired on with the defense
team and the statute of limitations expired. Then the FDA revoked
the petition for approval. You would then think the FDA had the
upper hand. Through the efforts of Don Rumsfeld who was CEO of
Searle at the time, an FDA commissioner was appointed to over-rule
the Board of Inquiry, and a U.S. President actually wrote an
executive order making the FDA powerless of do anything about
aspartame until they got Hayes to FDA to do this deadly deed. Here we
have the case where world renowned researchers and physicians tried
to stop the approval of what they already know was poison and did not
succeed.
So as poisons continue to be FDA approved what reliance does the
public have of safety? None. However, the FDA has had the
opportunity many times to ban the product and didn't have the courage
to do so. As FDA toxicologist Dr. Adrian Gross told Congress, "And
if the FDA violates it own law who is left to protect the public?
There is no one, the reason Mission Possible International exists, as
a warning to the public on this issue.
Betty
www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com and www.wnho.net
Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
DR Betty Martini ,D.Hum
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Dr. John Olney is one of the most renowned neuroscientists in the
world today and tried to prevent the approval of aspartame. He did
studies on the aspartic acid in aspartame and found it caused lesions
in the brains of mice. He founded the field of neuroscience called
Excitotoxicity. Dr. Russell Blaylock, wrote the book on
it: Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, www.russellblaylockmd.com
This is his report to the Board of Inquiry telling them what would
happen to the brains of our children if it was
approved. http://www.wnho.net/dr_olney1.doc Unfortunately, the
prophecy has been fulfilled.
Dr. Olney realized with MSG already on the market, the addiction of
aspartame, with 40% of the molecule being aspartic, an excitotoxin,
it would be double trouble. Read his letter. Today our children are
medicated instead of educated.
Here is a case where the FDA attempted to have the manufacturer
indicted for fraud. Both US Prosecutors hired on with the defense
team and the statute of limitations expired. Then the FDA revoked
the petition for approval. You would then think the FDA had the
upper hand. Through the efforts of Don Rumsfeld who was CEO of
Searle at the time, an FDA commissioner was appointed to over-rule
the Board of Inquiry, and a U.S. President actually wrote an
executive order making the FDA powerless of do anything about
aspartame until they got Hayes to FDA to do this deadly deed. Here we
have the case where world renowned researchers and physicians tried
to stop the approval of what they already know was poison and did not
succeed.
So as poisons continue to be FDA approved what reliance does the
public have of safety? None. However, the FDA has had the
opportunity many times to ban the product and didn't have the courage
to do so. As FDA toxicologist Dr. Adrian Gross told Congress, "And
if the FDA violates it own law who is left to protect the public?
There is no one, the reason Mission Possible International exists, as
a warning to the public on this issue.
Betty
www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com and www.wnho.net
Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
DR Betty Martini ,D.Hum
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Decender 8, 1987
Senator Howard M. Metzendaum
United States Senate
140 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, 0.C. 20510
Dear Senator Metzenbaum:
{have been asked to update the Comittee on my position regarding the severa?
Deurotoxicology issues that I end other neurosclentists presented before the
Public Board of Inquiry (PBOI) on aspartane (Nutrasweet) in 1980. Three
Separate neurotoxicity {ssues were focused upot: at the PROT, one pertaining to
the neurotoxic properties of aspartate (a major component’ of the Nutrasweet
molecule), another to the neurotoxic properties of phenylalanine (the other
BaJor component of the Nutrasweet molecule) and the third to brain tumorss 7
will dfscuss the status of each Issue as I see it today.
1. Aspartate neurotoxicity.
Asparcate (Asp) and the related conpound, glutamate (Glu), are present in high
concentration in the brain where they Serve as excitatory neurotransnitters
and participate in mich of the information processing that occurs in the
samalian central nervous system. Paradoxically, these substences have
striking neurotoxic potenttal--tf allowed to have. sustained contact with
receptors on the extertor surface of the nerve cell, they literally excite the
cell to death. The reason they do not nm» iifest neurotoxic activity under
ordinary circumstances is that they are synthesized and contained inside the
nerve cells end are enitted outside only in tiny anounts for. transmitter
purposes: after transmitting a signal (exciting a neighbor cell), they are
immediately (within milliseconds) taken beck up into the cell
Etghteen years ago, before the above information was known, my research group
aiscovered that when Glu or Asp are adainistered orally to animals of various
Species including monkeys, they destroy nerve cells in certain parts ‘oF the
brain. We found that Glu and Asp act in concert such that when. ingested
together they add to one anothers toxicity. Although we found animals at any
age susceptible to Glu/Asp neurotoxicity, immature animals were mich more
sensitive than adults. Over the years nevrosctentists have developed & much
better understanding of this neurotoxte phenomenon. When Glu or Asp are
ingested, they are absorbed into the blood very rapidls which causes blood
Prose: (314) 262 1007
‘a0 Rotation Avro
Sen Minor 0
(Medial Shot Be 84)Sevstyr umara m. netsana
levels O° tnese aming acids to ne transiently elevated. This, voses no hazard
fer most portions of che brain becauce Gly and Asp are prevented by Diood
srain-barriers from entering most regions of the brein. However, there are
several smal! regions of brain that Tack blood orain barriers, and bloodborne
Glu and sz freely oenetrate these brain regions. This brings Glu and Asp In
Girect contact with receators on ihe evtertor surfaces of nerve cells, ard
Zlaces sucn nerve cells in seapardy of being excited to death. Nerve cells in
immature brain are at greatest risk of neing destroyed because important
protective nechanisas are not yet functionally competent. In the neurosc lence
Equnity today, this 1s comonly referred to as excitotonic cell death aed
Stu and’Asp are ‘known a5 excitotox ins. The Glu and Asp contained tn the orate
are called endogenous excttotoxing and tne Glu and Asp encountered in the
onviranent are calTed eogenous excitotonins.
najor sgurce of hemas contact with exogenous exc!totoxins is through the
4 supply. Glu, tn tne form of !1 sedium salty monosodium
}+ 15 8 very heavily used food additive. Im 1969 when T first
Gescr bed the extreme sensitivity of the tnmature brain to the toxic effect af
Gre, daby Food sarufacturers were adding very lerge amounts of Glu to beby
feods. After I presented my research Findings in test mony before the Sonera
Select Commsttee on Mutrition ang Human Needs (1970), the Nixon white horse
yorked out en agreement between FOA ard the industries concerned whereby baby
food manufacturers (who comprised a small fraction of the Glu market): mound
woluntartly" sult adding Gtu te baby foods. I applauded this pert of the
agreenent dut not the accompanying quid pro quo which was that FLA wou td
Continue to cl sify Glu as GRAS (generally regarded as safe) and would
Continue to allow other food manufacturers (comprising the bulk of “the Glo
market) to add unlimited anounts of Glu to "aduit" foods destined to. be
ingested by consumers of al} ages. Thus, Glu was taken out of taby foods bur
yas rot taken ovt of foods fed to dabies. And, to this day, FOR strat
Class.fles Glu as GRAS, thereby conveying the dangerous message’ to parents
that ft is perfectly sate to feed Glu to Davies.
Another major source of Glu and Asp In foods 1s hydrolysed vegetable protein
(uve). 4B 4s 9 mixture of Glu, Asp and other amino actés. “Ie is because oF
IS5 exceedingly igh Glu concentration that MVP 1s used as a fond Flavoring
agent. | After the baby food industry quit adding Glu to baby foods tn 19/0)
they mediately began adding HVP tn huge amounts tn order to bring the Gla
level (1.e., the Flavor evel) back to where it had been before. Throughout
the 1970's I wrote letters, testified at hearings, etc. tryirg to get the bady
food companies to quit adding HVP to baby foods and trying to get FDA to tare
4 Rore responsible position. In the late 1370's, the baby food industry
{nally decided that their subterfuge was working more against them than fox
fhen so they opted for a clean image and quit adding excitotoxins to. baby
Foods. Mo headway was made with FDA: che agency {5 still misleading and
Biseducating mothers into thinking that It is perfectly safe to feed Glu, WE
for any other excitutoxins to babies.Senator Howard M, Metzenbaum
Pane 3.
hen Yutrasweet was first propased as a swectener, I was concerned because SUL
OF the Sutrasweet molecule is Asp and they wore Sroposing to add it primar’ ly
te childrens Foois and beverages (00! aid, coated Dreaxfast cereal, etc.)
In 19%, FO8 approved Nutraswoet for such’ uses without even requiring the
manufacturer io determine whether it Has the kind of neurotoxicity that Asy.
mat known to have. Therefore, 1 obtained sone Nutrasueet in. 1974, adminis.
lered it crai'y to infant rice and cenonstrated that it destroys nerve cel !s
just ke Glu ‘and Asp uo. | sent thls evidence to FA and tiled a forma!
Brotest against their approval of the adgitive Because of Information that
was surfacing at that tine implicating the manufacturer in apparent Traudu-
Tent practices, FA stayed thefr approval of Nutrasweet and granted me the
Fight to ¢ hearing which was to take place after FOR completed their. Invest i=
gation of the narufacturer. The nearing finally took place in 1980 es a
POOL. In Framing the issues for the POO!, 3 insisted that the Issue of Asp
neurotoxicity not be considered Im the narrow canter: of Asp alone but rather
in the content of adding Asp to a food supply that already contains a similar
excttotovin (Glu) im amounts potentially dangerous Far immature consumers.
In 1979 the Commissioner of FDA (Acting Commissioner, Sherwin Gardner)
Selected 1 newer panel of scientists to serve as judges for the POO. |
strongly oppesed the apcointment of one of these judges on grounds of conflict
Of Interest au lack of qualifications. The Commissioner arbitrarily over-
ruled my abject 'ens aitowing re no alternative but to participate in the PBOL
under protest. Asst turned out, the pane? member whom {considered
inappropriate mas given a \sproportionately large snare of responsiblity For
deciding the Aso issue. The other 2 Judges focused primarily on the brain
tuner Issue which they Consivered of overriding importance because It provided.
ample basis in, itself for recommending disapproval of the additive, The
result of this "division of Tabor" arrangenent was that although al] 3 judges
Signed the report, a single inappropriate judge decided that the Asp component.
OF Nutrasweet did not pose any safety hazerd. He based his decision on a
Consideration of Asp alone without regard to the real issue, I.e., 15 it safe
to add Ase to the large amounts of Glu thet are already aduiterating the food
supply?
My opinion regeriting the status of the Asp neurotovicity Issum is that it was
handled in an inappropriate manner by the PBOL pare!: the real safety issue
Still remains unrescived and human young are being exposed to potentially
dangerous ard ever Increasing amounts of Glu and Asp, both of which are
exogenous excitotoxins that can rapidly destroy nerve ceils in the developing
brain. the anount of Glu being added to foods today is dangerous In Itself:
adding a second excitotoxin (&sp) to the sane food supply Increases. the
Ganger.
To put the issue in proper perspective, let me bring you up to date on other
developments in the field of excitotoxicology. It is now becoming abundant ly
Clear that endogenous excitotoxins (1-e., the Glu and Asp naturally present in
the brain) are responsib's for several very comon types of brain damage that