hllosophers ln hlsLorlcal perlods of phllosophy

Anc|ent Med|eva| Modern Contemporary

SocraLes SL Abelard lrancls 8acon CW Pegel
laLo SL Anselm 8ene uescarLes MarLln Peldegger
ArlsLoLle SL AugusLlne 8aruch Splnoza karl Marx
1hales SL 1homas Aqulnas CoLLfrled Lelbnlz Ldmund Pusserl
PeracllLus 8oeLhlus 1homas Pobbes Soren klerkegaard
armenldes Wllllam of Cccam !ohn Locke ArLhur Schopenhauer
yLhagoras

Ceorge 8erkeley lrledrlch nleLzsche
Lplcurus

uavld Pume Maurlce MerleauonLy
Anaxlmander lmmanuel kanL !ean aul SarLre
Anaxlmenes 8erLrand 8ussell
uemocrlLus

Ludwlg WlLLgensLeln

PlsLorlcal perlods ln phllosophy and Lhelr orlenLaLlon
Anc|ent c|ass|ca|
ph||osophy Med|eva| h||osophy Modern h||osophy Contemporary h||osophy
1hls perlod emphaslzes a
concern wlLh Lhe ulLlmaLe
naLure of reallLy
CharacLerlzed by a raLlonallzaLlon
of ChrlsLlan falLh uslng phllosophy
CharacLerlzed by a separaLlon of
reason from falLh
A perlod whlch ls generally cenLered
on language and llngulsLlc analysls
1he prlmary concern ls
abouL how Lo conducL
human llfe
1he mosL promlnenL phllosophers
durlng Lhls Llme are Lhlnkers from
Lhe ChrlsLlan 1radlLlon
A perlod where phllosophers have
lmblbed a sysLem aLlc and
emplrlcal approach Lo phllosophy
Cne CharacLerlsLlc of Lhls perlod ls
an lnLerdlsclpllnary approach ln
Lheory and pracLlce

1hls perlod ls dlvlded beLween
emplrlclsm and ldeallsm

8ranches of hllosophy and Lhe quesLlon Lhey alm Lo answer

Metaphys|cs Lp|stemo|ogy o||t|cs Aesthet|cs
h||osophy of
re||g|on Cosmo|ogy Cnto|ogy Lth|cs Log|c
WhaL ls Lhe
ulLlmaLe naLure of
Lhlngs?
WhaL can we
know?
Pow should Lhe
sLaLe Lo lLs people
and vlce cersa?
WhaL ls
beauLlful?
uoes Cod
LxlsL?
WhaL ls Lhe
naLure of Lhe
unlverse?
WhaL ls
Lhe end of
human
llfe?
WhaL are Lhe
basses of Lhe
morallLy of
human acLs?
WhaL are Lhe
sLandards of
correcL
Lhlnklng?
WhaL ls Lhe
essence of
naLure?
ls lL posslble Lo
go beyond
phenomena?
WhaL ls Lhe ldeal
form of
governmenL?
WhaL are
Lhe
sLandards
of beauLy? Pow ls Cod?
uoes llfe
have a
purpose?
WhaL ls Lhe
foundaLlon of
good and bad?
Pow can we
deLermlne lf an
argumenL ls
fallaclous?

Pow ls Lhe
process of
knowlng?
WhaL are Lhe
evldence for
Lhe
exlsLence/non
exlsLence of
Cod?
WhaL acLlons
are consldered
lmmoral?

uoes Lhe
exLernal world
Lruly exlsL?