Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Page-254-
Jack C. McCormac, James K. Nelson (2006). Design of Reinforced Concrete ACI 318-05 Code Edition, seventh edition.
In designing retaining walls, an engineer must assume some of their dimensions. Called proportioning, such assumptions allow the engineer to check trial sections of the walls for stability. In figure below shows the general proportions of various retaining wall components that can be used for initial checks.
Bowles,J. E. (1977).
Jack C. McCormac, James K. Nelson (2006). Design of Reinforced Concrete ACI 318-05 Code Edition, seventh edition.
Page-256-
A retaining wall may fail in any of the following ways: - It may oveturn about its toe. - It may slide along its base. - It may fail due to the loss of bearing capacity of the soil supporting the base. - It may undergo deep-seated shear failure. - It may go through excessive settlement.
Page-257-
Failure of retaining wall: (a) by overturning; (b) by sliding; (c) by bearing capacity failure; (d) by deep-seated shear failure. Braja M. Das (2007). Principle of Foundation Engineering, sixth edition.
1. Checiking for Overturning
The Rankine active pressure Pa = 1 2 1 H Ka 2 Ph = Pa cos ( ) The vertical active force Pv = Pa sin ( ) The Rankine passive pressure 1 2 Pp = Kp 2 D + 2 c2 Kp D 2
2 2 Kp = tan 45deg + 2
Ka =
1 sin1 1 + sin1
Page-258-
Page-259-
Moment about C M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 Mv
MR
kN m
3
The usaul minimum desirable value or the factor of safety with respect to overturning is 2 to 3 FSoverturing =
MR =
M0
M1 + M2 + M3 + M4 + M5 + M6 + Mv H Pa cos ( ) 3
2. Checking for Sliding along the Base The factor of safety against sliding can be calculated as
FSsliding = where
FR F d
Pa cos ( )
= sum of the horizontal driving forces = angle of friction between the soil and the base slab
Page-260-
c'a
Check for sliding along the Braja M. Das base Principle of Foundation Engineering, sixth edition. (2007). In many cased, the passive force Pp is ignored in calculating the factor of safety with respect to sliding. In general, we can write ' = k1 2 and c'a = k2 c2. In most cases, k1a 1 2 nd k2 are in range from to . Thus, 2 3 FSsliding =
V tan k1 2 + B k2 c2 + Pp Pa cos ( )
If the desired value of FSsliding is not achieved, several alternatives may be investigated: 1. Increase the width of the base slab (i.e., the heel of the footing). 2. Use a key to the base slab. If a key is include, the passive force per unit length of the wall becomes Pp = 1 2 2 D1 Kp + 2c2 D1 Kp 2
Page-261-
Alternatives for increasing the factor of safety with respect to sliding Braja M. Das (2007). Principle of Foundation Engineering, sixth edition.
3. Checking for Bearing Capacity Failure
The net moment of these forces about point C Mnet = MR M0 The distance from point C to E X= Mnet V B X 2
The pressure distribution under the base slab may be determined by using simple principle from the mechanics of materials. First, we have q= where Mnet = moment = ( V) e I = moment of inertia per unit length of the base section = 1 2 ( 1m) B 2
V Mnet y A I
Page-262-
Check for bearing capacity failure Braja M. Das (2007). Principle of Foundation Engineering, sixth edition.
V B ( 1m) 1 3 B 12 The maximum and minimum pressure
( V) e
q=
( )
B 2
6 e V qmax = qtoe = 1 + B B
Page-263-
6 e V qmin = qheel = 1 B B The ultimate bearing capacity of a shallow foundation 1 qu = c2 Nc Fcd Fci + q Nq Fqd Fqi + 2 B' N Fd Fi 2 where q = 2 D B' = B 2 e Fcd = 1 + 0.4 F d = 1
= tan
D B'
) 2 B'
2 1 2
P cos 1 a
FSbearing =
qu qmax
Differnt type of loads are often imposed on the surface of the backfill behind a retaining wall. If the load is uniform, an equivalent height of soil, hs may be assumed acting on
the wall to account for the increased pressure. For the wall shown in Figure below, the horizontal pressure due to the surcharge is constant throughout the depth of the retaining wall.
ws
Pp
D D/3
Ph2 Ph1
H/3
surcharge effect under a uniform load ws hs = w where hs ws w = equivalent height of soil = pressure of the surcharge = unit weight of soil
Page-264-
H2 Ph = Ph1 + Ph2 = Ka w + H hs 2
In the case of a partial uniform load acting at a distance from the wall, only a portion of the total surcharge pressure affects the wall as in Figure below.
ws 45o H
Pp
D D/3
Ph2
Ph1
H/3
surcharge effect under a partial uniform load at a distance from the wall It is common practice to assume that the effective height of pressure due to partial surcharge is h' measured from point B to the base of retaining wall. The line AB form an angle of 45deg with horizontal.
15.5 Design Requirements
The ACI Code provides methods for bearing wall design. The main requirements are as folllow 1 the supported height or lenght, 25 whichever is shorter, but not less than 100mm. 1. The minimum thickness of bearing wall is 1 tmin = h 25 wall where hwall = the height of wall
2. The minimum area of the horzontal reinforcement in the wall is 0.0025 b h, but this value may be reduced to 0.0020b h if diameter 16mm or smaller deformed bars with fy 400MPa are used. Ah.min = 0.0025 b h if diameter > 16mm for fy 400MPa 0.0020 b h if diameter 16mm
3. The minimum area of the vertical reinforcement is 0.0015 b h, but it may be reduced to 0.0012 b h if diameter 16mm or smaller deformed bars with fy 400MPa are used. Av.min = 0.0015 b h if diameter > 16mm for fy 400MPa 0.0012 b h if diameter 16mm
4. The maximum spacing of the vertical or the horzontal reinforcing bars is the smaller of 450mm or three times the wall thickness.
Page-265-
5. If the wall thickness exceed 250mm, the vertical and horzontal reinforcement should be placed in two layers parallel to the exterior and interior wall surface, as follows: a/ For exterior wall surface, at leat 0.5 of the reinforcement As ( but not more than 2 A ) should have a minimum concrete cover of 50mm but not more than 1/3 of 3 s the wall thickness. 2 1 As.exterior = As and covermin = 50mm hwall 3 3 b/ For interior wall surface, the balance of the reinforcement in each direction should have a minimum concrete cover of 25mm but not more than 1/3 of the wall thickness. 1 covermin = 25mm hwall 3 c/ The minimum steel area in the wall footing (heel or toe) according to ACI Code is that required for shrinkage and temperature reinforcement, which is 0.0018 b h when fy = 400MPa and 0.002 b h when fy = 350MPa or fy = 275MPa.Becau se this minimum steel area is relately small, it is a common practice to increase it to that minimumn As.min required for flexure: As.shrinkage = 0.0018 b h if fy = 400MPa 0.002 b h if fy = 350MPa fy = 275MPa As.min = 0.25 f'c 1.4 b d b d fy fy
Page-266-
Example15.1
ws
1 1
c1
H1
2 2 c2
H2 B1 B2 B B3
Geometry of wall:
B1 := 1m
B2 := 0.6m
B3 := 1.9m
B := B1 + B2 + B3 = 3.5 m stem width of upper wall wall height b := 0.3m H1 := 5.4m H2 := 0.6m
Soil properties:
H := H1 + H2 = 6 m
1 := 18
backfill soil
kN m
3
1 := 35deg 2 := 20deg
soil in font
2 := 19.5
kN m
3
kN c2 := 20 2 m
Material:
kN m
3
ws := 12
kN m
2
B3 H1 b H 1 A := ( B2 b) H1 2 B H 2
Page-268-
ws
A2
A1
Ph1
Ph2 A3 Pp A4 qimn
R
H 3
H 2
qmax CL e
x 0.5B
1 c := c c
ORIGIN := 1
18 24 kN = 24 m3 24
i := 1 .. rows ( )
Wi := Ai i
Page-269-
B B 3 2 b B1 + B2 2 X := ( B2 b) B1 + 2 B 2 Mi := Wi Xi
R :=
W = 293.4
kN m
MR :=
M = 637.866
kN m 1m
Section No. Area (m2) Unit weight (kN/m) Moment arm (m) Moment(kNm/m) 1 2 3 4 10.260 1.620 0.810 2.100 184.680 38.880 19.440 50.400 293.400 2.550 1.450 1.150 1.750 470.934 56.376 22.356 88.200 637.866
b/ the unfactor force acting on the wall using Rankine equation Ka := Ph1 := 1 sin 1 = 0.271 1 + sin 1 1 kN 2 Ka 1 H = 87.801 2 m
( ) ( )
ws hs := = 0.667 m 1
Page-270-
Mo
wall = "is not overturning" 2. Checking of wall against sliding Rankine passive force per unit length let 2 k1 := = 0.667 3 k2 := k1 = 0.667
Pp :=
1 kN 2 Kp 2 D + 2c2 Kp D = 67.521 2 m
FSsliding := wall :=
"is not sliding along the base" if FSoverturning 1.5 "is sliding along the base" otherwise
wall = "is not sliding along the base" 3. Checking of wall against bearing capacity failure a/ the eccentricity of the resultant x := e :=
MR Mo R = 1.376 m
B x = 0.374 m 2
Page-271-
footing :=
B 6
6 e kN R qmin := 1 = 30.088 2 B B m wall := "is not failure" if qmax qa "is failure" otherwise wall = "is not failure" 4. Design of stem a/ main reinforcement The lateral forces applied to the wall are calculate using a load factor of 1.6. The critical section for bending moment is at the bottom of the wall. Calculate the applied ultimate forces: kN Pu1 := 1.6 Ph1 = 140.481 m kN Pu2 := 1.6 Ph2 = 31.218 m H1 H1 kN m Mu1 := 1.6 Pu1 + Pu2 = 539.448 1m 3 2 h := B2 = 0.6 m R := Mu1 0.9 d1
2
d1 := h 30mm +
20mm = 560 mm 2
= 1.911 MPa
f'c := 0.85 1 fy
Page-272-
f'c 0.25MPa MPa 1.4MPa min := max , = 0.0035 fy fy mm As1 := max , min d1 = 2.808 mm
20mm = 410 mm 2
= 2.229 MPa
f'c 1 fy
Page-273-
b/ Temperature and shrinkage reinforcement the minimum horizontal reinforcement at the base of wall is: cm As.min := 0.002 B2 = 12 1m for the bottom third H1 3
= 1.8 m
2
As.min_0.33 := 0.002
B2 2 3
= 8
cm 1m
2H1 3
= 3.6 m
because the front face of the wall is mostly exposed to temperture changes, use half to two-thirds of the horizontal bars at the external face of wall and place the balance at the internal face. cm As.tem := 0.5 As.min = 6 1m
2
stem_wall :=
Page-274-
h := H2 = 600 mm
d := h 50mm
25mm = 562.5 mm 2
Vc := 0.75 0.17MPa
heel :=
= 2.758 MPa
:= 0.85
f'c 1 fy
sheel := Floor
( 25mm) 4
As
, 10mm = 110 mm
2
Page-275-
6. Design of the toe The toe of base acts as a cantiveler beam subject to upward pressure. The critical section for the bending moment is at the front face of the stem. The critical for shear is at a distance d from the front face of stem. The toe is subject to an upward pressure from the soil and downward pressure due to self weight of the toe slab.
q1 B1 d
q2
qmin
detail stress of soil under the base kN q1 := qmax = 137.569 2 m Vu := 1.6 toe := q1 B B1 d kN = 76.154 2 B m
q2 :=
q1 + q2 kN ( B1 d) 1.2 ( H1 c) ( B1 d) = 6.763 1m 2
Page-276-
R :=
Mu 0.9 d
2
= 0.325 MPa
:= 0.85
f'c 1 fy
stoe := Floor
( 20mm) 4
As
, 10mm = 150 mm
upper stem wall steel bar
Page-277-