Formative and Summative Evaluation There are many different types of evaluations depending on the object being evaluated

and the purpose of the evaluation. Perhaps the most important basic distinction in evaluation types is that between formative and summative evaluation. Formative evaluations strengthen or improve the object being evaluated -- they help form it by examining the delivery of the program or technology, the quality of its implementation, and the assessment of the organizational context, personnel, procedures, inputs, and so on. Summative evaluations, in contrast, examine the effects or outcomes of some object -- they summarize it by describing what happens subsequent to delivery of the program or technology; assessing whether the object can be said to have caused the outcome; determining the overall impact of the causal factor beyond only the immediate target outcomes; and, estimating the relative costs associated with the object. Summative assessment - Summative assessment is generally carried out at the end of a course or project. In an educational setting, summative assessments are typically used to assign students a course grade.

Formative assessment - Formative assessment is generally carried out throughout a course or project. Formative assessment, also referred to as "educative assessment," is used to aid learning. In an educational setting, formative assessment might be a teacher (or peer) or the learner, providing feedback on a student's work, and would not necessarily be used for grading purposes. Educational researcher Robert Stake explains the difference between formative and summative assessment with the following analogy: " When the cook tastes the soup, that's formative. When the guests taste the soup, that's summative. "

Formative assessment Formative evaluation includes several evaluation types: needs assessment determines who needs the program, how great the need is, and what might work to meet the need

evaluability assessment determines whether an evaluation is feasible and how stakeholders can help shape its usefulness structured conceptualization helps stakeholders define the program or technology, the target population, and the possible outcomes implementation evaluation monitors the fidelity of the program or technology delivery process evaluation investigates the process of delivering the program or technology, including alternative delivery procedures Summative assessment Summative assessment (or Summative evaluation) refers to the assessment of the learning and summarizes the development of learners at a particular time. After a period of work, e.g. a unit for two weeks, the learner sits for a test and then the teacher marks the test and assigns a score. The test aims to summarize learning up to that point. The test may also be used for diagnostic assessment to identify any weaknesses and then build on that using formative assessment. Summative assessment is commonly used to refer to assessment of educational faculty by their respective supervisor. It is imposed onto the faculty member, and uniformly applied, with the object of measuring all teachers on the same criteria to determine the level of their performance. It is meant to meet the school or district's needs for teacher accountability and looks to provide remediation for substandard performance and also provides grounds for dismissal if necessary. The evaluation usually takes the shape of a form, and consists of check lists and occasionally narratives. Areas evaluated include classroom climate, instruction, professionalism, and planning and preparation.[1] Summative assessment is characterized as assessment of learning and is contrasted with formative assessment, which is assessment for learning. It provides information on the product's efficacy (its ability to do what it was designed to do). For example, did the learners learn what they were supposed to learn after using the instructional module. In a sense, it does not bother to assess "how they did," but more importantly, by looking at how the learners performed, it provides information as to whether the product teaches what it is supposed to teach.

Characteristics 1. It tends to use well defined evaluation designs. [i.e. fixed time and content] 2. It provides descriptive analysis. [i.e. in order to give a grade, all the activities done throughout the year are taken into account] 3. It tends to stress local effects. 4. It is unoppressive and not reactive as far as possible. 5. It is positive, tending to stress what students can do rather than what they cannot.

Summative evaluation can also be subdivided:

outcome evaluations investigate whether the program or technology caused demonstrable effects on specifically defined target outcomes impact evaluation is broader and assesses the overall or net effects -- intended or unintended -- of the program or technology as a whole cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis address questions of efficiency by standardizing outcomes in terms of their dollar costs and values secondary analysis reexamines existing data to address new questions or use methods not previously employed meta-analysis integrates the outcome estimates from multiple studies to arrive at an overall or summary judgement on an evaluation question

Formative versus Summative Evaluation Formative evaluation is a process of ongoing feedback on performance. The purposes are to identify aspects of performance that need to improve and to offer corrective suggestions. Be generous with formative evaluation. Share your observations and perceptions with the student. You might simply share your observation and then ask the student if (s)he can think of a better approach for the next time. Formative evaluation need not make a judgment. When giving formative feedback, offer some alternatives to the student, e.g., "That procedure will be more comfortable for the patient if you?." If you observe unsafe or questionable practices, address those directly and immediately with the student. Use the student's patient management documentation as well as your observations of performance to offer formative evaluation. The student's charting

reveals organizational skills, priorities, thought process, and judgment. Over the duration of the student's experience with you, point out improvement to the student. Summative evaluation is a process of identifying larger patterns and trends in performance and judging these summary statements against criteria to obtain performance ratings. The faculty assumes responsibility for completing the summative evaluation at the end of the course. However, faculty rely upon your evidence and perceptions to justify ratings. The table below compares formative and summative evaluation according to the kind of information provided and the timing. Formative Evaluation Summative Evaluation

What information Specific description of daily events General trends based on specific descriptions Organizational skills Needs assessment When to give At the time of the incident End of the day Weekly re: progress Give both formative and summative evaluation to the student in private as a general rule. However, formative evaluation is needed if safety concerns arise in a student's practice while with a patient. Also, at times you will lose a learning opportunity if you do not give the student a chance to practice an alternative approach at the time, but reserve your suggestions for a later conversation. Use your judgment and employ tact and sensitivity to avoid embarrassing the student. Formative v.s. Summative Evaluation Formative Evaluation Formative Evaluation is a bit more complex than summative evaluation. It is done with a small group of people to "test run" various aspects of instructional materials. For example, you might ask a friend to look over your web pages to see if they are graphically pleasing, if there are errors you've missed, if it has navigational problems. It's like having someone look over your shoulder during the development phase to help you catch things that you miss, but a fresh set of eye might not. At times, you might need to have this help from a target audience. For example, if you're designing learning materials for third graders, you should have a third grader as part of your Formative Evaluation. Summative Evaluation Summative evaluation provides information on the product's efficacy ( it's ability to do what it was designed to do). For example, did the learners learn what they were supposed to learn after using the instructional module. In a sense, it lets the learner know "how they did," but more importantly, by looking at how the learner's did, it helps you know whether the product teaches what it is supposed to teach. Summative evaluation is typically quantitative, using numeric scores or letter grades to assess learner achievement. Overall attitude Comparison with evaluation tool Mid-point in the course End of the course

Here are some different author's definitions of Formative So what is the difference between a Summative Evaluation that will help you understand the difference. Evaluation and Learner Assessment? Scriven, (1991) Although both might look at the same data, a Learner Assessment generally looks at how an individual Formative evaluation is typically conducted during the learner performed on a learning task. It assesses a development or improvement of a program or product (or student's learning -- hence the name Learner person, and so on) and it is conducted,often more than Assessment. For example, you might assess an entire once, for in-house staff of the program with the intent to class of students, but you are assess them improve. The reports normally remain in-house; but individually to see how each did. serious formative evaluation may be done by an internal or an external evaluator or preferably, a combination; of A Summative Evaluation, on the other hand, looks at course, many program staff are, in an informal sense, more than one learner's performance to see how well constantly doing formative evaluation. a group did on a learning task that utilized specific learning materials and methods. By looking at the group, the instructional designer can evaluate the Weston, Mc Alpine, and Bordonaro, (1995) learning materials and learning process -- hence the name Summative Evaluation. For example, here The purpose of formative evaluation is to validate or ensure that the goals of the instruction are being achieved you may find that, as a group, all of the students did and to improve the instruction, if necessary, by means of well on Section A of some instructional materials, identification and subsequent remediation of problematic but didn't do so well on Section B. That would

aspects. Worthen, Sanders, and Fitzpatrick, (1997) Formative evaluation is conducted to provide program staff evaluative information useful in improving the program. Robert Stakes "When the cook tastes the soup, thats formative; when the guests taste the soup, thats summative." Scriven, (1996)

indicate that the designer should go back and look at the design or delivery of Section B.

"is research-oriented vs. action-oriented" "evaluations are intended - by the evaluator - as a basis for improvement" "the summative vs. formative distinction is context dependent"

Formative & Summative Evaluations in Teaching By Marysia Walcerz, eHow Contributor Evaluations provide essential information about student progress. Formative and summative evaluations are two methods of testing that are used in the classroom to determine how students are progressing and whether changes should be made to teaching methods. Summative evaluations are periodic student evaluations that take the forms of tests, quizzes and state assessments. Formative evaluations are ongoing student evaluations that are incorporated into classroom practice to provide the teacher with a constant stream of information about the efficacy of their instruction. Other People Are Reading

How to Create a Rubric Formative Evaluation Formative & Summative Assessment Techniques

Print this article 1. Summative Evaluations

o

Summative evaluations are the most commonly thought of type of evaluation- tests, quizzes and assessments that check the academic progress of a group of students. Summative evaluations can be state assessments, such as standardized tests or teacher-created evaluations that reflect a recent topic covered in class. These types of evaluations are useful for determining grades and modifying future curriculum, although they are not helpful in modifying curriculum as it is being taught, since they only test students at the end of a particular lesson. Formative Evaluations

Formative evaluations, in contrast to summative evaluations, occur continuously in the classroom. Formative evaluations happen as the student is learning and practicing new skills, often taking the form of in class worksheets, homework assignments, practice problems, and on going assignments. Teachers use formative evaluations to not only evaluate the student's ongoing progress, but also their own efficacy as educators. Formative evaluations provide the information necessary to change curriculum and teaching methods if necessary, resulting in a better prepared, higher scoring class. Sponsored Links Top Telemarketing Centers

Compare Telemarketers & Save Money World Class Call Center Outsourcing www.WorldwideCallCenters.com Using Each
o

Formative and summative evaluations are meant to be used in tandem, each fulfilling a role that results in an accurate impression of students' progress. If formative evaluations have been successfully helping the teacher do the best job possible to prepare students for testing, the summative evaluations should reflect the student's successful grasp of knowledge. Relying solely on either summative or formative evaluations can seriously hamper a teacher's ability to effectively reach their students and impart information. In the Classroom

While summative evaluations are fairly easy to implement in the classroom, formative evaluations are less intuitive. Although worksheets and homework can tell a great deal about a student's progress, teachers should be including regular evaluations into their lessons. A simple "Does everyone understand the material I just covered?" at the end of a lesson can provide valuable insight into one's teaching strategies. Teachers should remember that one of the major points of evaluations should be to reconsider their own teaching methods to be the most effective educator they can be. Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Nursing Education By Elly Turner, eHow Contributor Regular evaluation of training programs helps to ensure effectiveness and relevance. With a nursing shortage in full swing since the turn of the millenium and a more recent shortage in nursing school faculty, the need for comprehensive evaluation of nursing education programs is urgent. Evaluative models provide guidelines for effective data collection and analysis. Other People Are Reading

Hospital Nurse Training Importance of Nursing Education Evaluation Programs

Print this article 1. Evaluating a Nursing Education Program in its Academic Community Context
o

Multiple methods and models of comprehensive evaluation are available for studying the effectiveness of a nursing school with its constituents, often including students, alumni, faculty, employers and community partners. Evaluation may include study of distance-learning effectiveness, nursing curriculum impact or data collection methods. Comprehensive evaluation models should take into account whether care theories are being learned, implemented and used in society. 2. The Neuman Systems Model The Neuman Systems Model of comprehensive nursing education evaluation is a multi-disciplinary approach to measuring nursing education. It specifically integrates physiological, psychological and other concerns as part of patient care. Developed by Dr. Betty Neuman, it emphasizes teaching theory and serves as a system for instructing nursing students. Stake's Countenance Evaluation Model Robert E. Stake's Countenance Evaluation Model supports formal rather than informal evaluation and utilizes judgment and description of the evaluated program. Using the matrix of description and the matrix of judgment, information can be collected and studied. Stake's evaluation model has been seen as a fundamental resource for evaluating complex organizations, particularly academia.