WHO MADE WHO ?

By: Michael-Joseph
Capacity is a key to understanding. See that a Kingdom establishes many offices of Trust. For again what of a King absent a People. The People must put their full faith and credit into the Kingdom and then the King is fully vested with power and authority.

What of a private man alone in his workings, does he hold any offices in the kingdom? Perhaps he does. Lets investigate marriage. The woman upon marrying the husbandman places her full faith and credit into said husbandman whereupon said husbandman covers her in regard to her affairs. She is not able to enter into any contract whatsoever without the express or implied consent of her husbandman. Therefore she TRUSTS her husbandman as she has placed her life into his care. This is called the doctrine of Coverture. Therefore this Coverture is the status of the woman UNDER COMMON LAW. Under Common Law per Scripture:

Gen 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. Eph 5:28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. Eph 5:29 For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: Eph 5:30 For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. Eph 5:31 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. Eph 5:32 This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church. Marriage is an earthly representative of the heavenly mystery. The wife places her full faith and credit into the husbandman and they TWO become ONE. Therefore the husbandman Covers his wife. And it is true that the wife is his in ALL respects for she gives her whole self to him - she does not refrain any measure of her being - she dies to her nature before marriage and revives, renewed in Him her husbandman. Therefore the husbandman is also bound in mutual agreement - a Contract - to Love his wife with his whole being. For truly she belongs to him. And if she belongs to him, then so do the children. Now then let me show you where the bonds of Scripture have been thrown off - because the Common Law is being actively put down and replaced with man's inventions. Lets see if we can find Scripture: Psa 2:3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. Now let us return to the Creator and His Creation. Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Notice the Earth was made first. Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. If the Earth is the Result of the Creation Function, F(x) = y, then man is the first derivative of the Creation Function. Or shall we say man's vessel is the first derivative. Now then, man is also vested with creative powers and therefore man's creation represents the 2nd derivative of the Creation Function.

But I digress, my engineering mind could stay on derivatives for a while but I think that I might lose many if I remain. Back to Coverture. And what I really want to discuss is Offices of Trust. The Husbandman occupies the office of Trustee. The wife occupies the Office of Beneficiary. Pray tell who will abide in the third office of Direction? The two become one in True Trust - see the Family Name is the TRUST NAME or it is sometimes called the BUSINESS NAME. Do you now recognize why everything you file at the Register of Deeds or at the County Clerk and Recorder is Probated? It is because the presumption that everything you do is in regard to your Estate. Who will guide this trust? Will it be the World or will it be the Scripture. Said another way will it be the Holy Spirit or another spirit? Eph 5:33 Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband. Therefore the husbandman is to love his wife more than himself or at least as much as himself and the wife is to submit herself to her loving husbandman. For she does not own him - Eve was taken out of Adam - but he does own her. Therefore prior to the Contract being made in times before the Husbandman would go to the wife's father and offer up a bride price that is paid by the groom to the parents of his potential bride. And a dower which is given to his bride on the day of the marriage. Examining the bride price, see now that this is the consideration for the exchange of property. For the woman was previously owned by her father. And the dower is a grant of property to the bride in case the husbandman dies or cannot perform his duty [in childbirth] or the husband is in breach of contract [adultery]. Therefore the dower allows the bride who may be widowed to live absent a new husbandman. For remember the law of divorce? Deu 24:1 When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. Deu 24:2 And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man's wife. Deu 24:3 And if the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, which took her to be his wife; Deu 24:4 Her former husband, which sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is abomination before the LORD: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance. Rom_7:2 For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband.

Rom_7:3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.

Now under Admiralty Law or Civil Law I can hear a lot of women breathing a sigh of relief in regards to the Common Law - as many a husbandman does not truly love his wife. But look at Romans 7:3. This is Common Law. The relationships in the Earth show forth the relationship of Heavenly means. Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Therefore the husbandman for the consideration of his brides full faith and credit grants a dower to his bride in case of his default. She has assurance in the face of default of her husbandman in the dower. For the consideration of the dower she places in Him all that she is and will issue - including her children. Therefore the Word of the Husbandman binds his Wife. This is the rite of baptism. Now then, we the Husbandman may within his judicial districts of ten, fifties, hundreds or thousands be elected to

public office - again I am speaking of common law and now the Civil Law which has perverted our being these days. Said Husbandman is vested in Trust by those who have pledged their full faith and credit to Him as Trustee. See it is the same model all over again and over and over and over..... For Adam was first alone and then Eve was fashioned from him. Yehovah is the Heavenly Adam and Wisdom is the Heavenly Eve - Sarah = Princess. The Command was Go and Yehovah sent Himself - for he Loves his Bride - in the Person of Yehoshuah.

The key is Capacity.

You are husbandman, daddy, friend, president of company, shareholder of company, etc. You hold many different capacities according to the many different agreements. Given that the Husbandman is the symbolic representation of God in the Earth, I for one can easily say that I have failed miserably but I am trying as I learn more each day to Trust my God with ALL my heart, ALL my mind and ALL my soul - I surrender as the Bride in Marriage.

P.S. A study in who is the Theophanic Angel - Sent One is attached. Glean what you can and disregard the rest. I did not perform said attached study, however, I find it useful to this discourse.

Democracy...majority rule, or restated, collective rule. Each is a slave to the whole, the common good. Sounds like communism. Job...the fence was taken down, but Satan could still only touch Job with Job's "consent " because Job didn't rebuke him. So with the state. ------------------MJ's response: In regard to the so called Democracy. The question is are your courts Common Law or Admiralty/Maritime courts. And furthermore, are they your courts? In the latter the jury, if there is even one, is at the total control of the State. In the former the jury decides for the whole of the people. So it is not an incorrect statement to say that in a common law jury said jury represents the country as a whole. And therefore can you see that in the former "Common Law jury" the lines between State and the People are drawn and made known in the jury box. For a jury will just return a not guilty verdict even in the face of a law broken. In the latter case, Admiralty Jury, the jury is told what law to use, the jury is questioned for selection purposes, the jurors are dismissed if they are not sympathetic to the State. And therefore what happens in the latter jury is the State sits as Judge and Jury and in reality as despotic dictator. For if a man is dismissed for following his conscience, then what of a State who has no conscience? So then I ask you what type of jury do you suppose is acting today? And further, what if the latter jury is sitting, and it is, and the verdicts are being applied as though they are common - as in common law - in the county court. The shire-reev is supposed to maintain his court in common law - which is a statement that says that the law commonly accepted by all families within his overview. See Exodus 18: 21-22. Captain over hundreds. What of a Shire-reev who now is a part of a DEPARTMENT or Agency. As in SHERIFF's DEPARTMENT. This is not the same as the common law sheriff, this is Admiralty Law.

Now onto Job. Job is a type of election. Yehovah intefered in Job's life.

This ONLY happens in the Elections

because the Elect have been prejustified by prior judgment. But notice there are 38 chapters in Job of whiny so called friends who maintain that Job is somehow guilty because Yehovah would not punish Job if he was not. And in reality Yehovah had removed his fence around Job to show Job as an Example. Remember the Elect are prejustified and therefore not subject to the test in this Age. But notice in Job's case, when he recognized that it was not Yehovah but Satan that was messing with him he then stood up and no longer consented to his torment. Reference Luke 10:19 for the restatement. Job did not consent. The struggle was not within him so he did not argue in regard to it - but he did not consent to be a part of it as well. The same is with State. The LEGAL NAME is a vessel that is not yours. You have no power to speak for it or defend it in any way without trespassing the trustee. So if you do, then you are a "de son tort trustee". Lets look at the United States in regard for what it did for the United States of America. The United States was an assembly of 55 men who pledged their individual estates to cover the United States of America. Now these 55 also held offices of trust within the United States of America but no other party save those 55 pledged anything to the cause. Therefore those 55 are "We the People" members of the body "of the United States". Therefore United States was a new Trust established by its Sovereigns the 55. Who did they do it for? "For Ourselves and our Posterity". Are you related to the Founders? I believe if you were you would know it. Want proof? at Chisholm v. Georgia the opinions produced the following:

To the Constitution of the United States, the term SOVEREIGN, is totally unknown. There is but one
place where it could have been used with propriety. But even in that place, it would not, perhaps, have comported with the delicacy of those who ordained and established that Constitution. They might have announced themselves "SOVEREIGN" people of the United States. But serenely conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious declaration.; and,

No such ideas obtain here; at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly
the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects (unless the African slaves among us may be so called), and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.; and, Clearly, at Chisholm v. Georgia, the Sovereigns are the Signatories or We the People and those Signatories chose not to employ that term Sovereign [to themselves] probably, in my opinion, as to not awaken the consciousness of Yisrael in regard to their former agreement codified with the Ever Living at 1st Samuel 8 in the 1611 King James Version referenced hereinbefore; and, clearly Chisholm v. George notices that the Sovereigns, the Signatories of the new Trust, [the] United States are in fact Sovereigns without Subjects and have none to govern but themselves; however, the ones who would come under the Shade of the new Trust [the] United States [Jonah's Gourd] take the office of citizen and are equal in that office as fellow citizens as joint tenants; and, the citizens of [the] United States of America remain as subjects to the king of England as these never pledged anything, except maybe a pledge to a flag, and therefore never took the necessary steps to set themselves apart in this world; and, in my opinion, these will always be Ruled and Governed as they will most likely never come to full liability for their actions; Lev 25:24 And in all the land of your possession ye shall grant a redemption for the land.

There is always a way to make a redemption else a curse will fall upon the State. The founders of State are not that dumb. Franklin hand wrote the entire Scripture as any King in Israel is commanded to do. A Sovereign is a king. But notice these 55 are Sovereigns without subjects. They are not subject to each other they are each

members of the same body "We the People" [= the 55] make up the body "of the United States". Every other man woman and child in the United States of America are NOT a part of the United States but can benefit by its existence. But I digress. Back to the point concerning Job. Job did not consent to Satan's actions, this shows Election, but Job had the power to tell Satan to go away any time he wanted. Restatement Luke 10:19. Beware friends like Elihu. Look at Job's wife she too said "give up Job, its just too much" [paraphrasing]. Lets see if we can find a similar type in the Restatement of the Old Testament: Mar 13:11 But when they shall lead you, and deliver you up, take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost. Mar 13:12 Now the brother shall betray the brother to death, and the father the son; and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall cause them to be put to death. Consent must exist for what is judgment absent choice? Job never rebuked Satan. Lets find another example in the Restatement of the Old Testament: Jud 1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, Yehovah rebuke thee. In a sense we are tested each day in Choice. We must choose whom we shall serve. Each day we choose. As we are bombarded with temptation. Therefore the Kingdom of God is this day for those who can receive it. We do not need to await the King's return - while He is returning - however, we can acknowledge the King sits today in Glory today is the day to choose. Today is the day to fan the fire within. Choose Life and do not consent to Death for in your silence or ignorance death will overtake you. So therefore be diligent and vigilant.

I do not vote and most likely will not ever vote again. It is not my part and I will not allow someone to use me for my opinion at some polling booth. Therefore I am removed from the Voter Registration rolls. I will not trespass the trustee of the United States or the United States of America or the State of North Carolina. These are without me.

poll noun 1. a sampling or collection of opinions on a subject

A hebrew Child has one name -I see it like this: If the State owns all rights titles and interests then there is no such thing as a Registered Owner unless said R.O. is in de son tort trustee. Because the State is the owner.

Therefore the Attorney does not care if you place the house, car, boat, whatever in Trust, that just slows him down on the Statutory side a bit in regard to process. It makes it ALOT harder to lien the property as SURNAME no longer owns it. Plus the trust keeps the private man just that private. so there are wonderful uses of the trust. However, we are told at Job 32:22 not to give surnames to mankind - for their is only one name above all names. A HEBREW child is only given ONE name. My name is "Michael Joseph" that is my name. consider this model: it just came to me: Adam/Eve listened to another lawgiver and become outlaws under Yehovah therefore they were naked before Yehovah. But they remained clothed in sin, before Ha Satan. The whole NEXUS is The Law. If you tort the State then you are clothed in sin. Else you are naked in REGARD TO THE STATE but you are covered in Yehoshuah, if you are a Son of God. You are like Joseph, and you will be captured and taken into the jurisdiction that finds you in the way. Examine Joseph, whist he had standing as the son of Jacob, he kept his mouth shut and lost all rights, he was sold as a slave. See now how terrible is Admiralty Law? Its rulings are worldwide and upon every person in the world, but said rulings have bearing only upon those who consent. And how can one withhold consent if one is completely ignorant? Therefore, I believe it was Franklin who when asked what type of Government did they fashion: "A republic IF YOU CAN KEEP IT." Meaning the ONLY way to keep it was to stay educated - enter the public school system. Let me see if I can find the ten planks of communism: The home of the free and the brave - yeah righThe home of the free and the brave - yeah right.

For what man

does not take a stand against what he knows is wrong? That would be a coward.
"And to the REPUBLIC for which it stands".....does it stand? Or has it been usurped by a Socialist Government called Democracy? A little Red Worm - see the Great Book of Jonah.

Oba 1:6 How are the things of Esau searched out! how are his hidden things sought up! Oba 1:7 All the men of thy confederacy have brought thee even to the border: the men that were at peace with thee have deceived thee, and prevailed against thee; they that eat thy bread have laid a wound under thee: there is none understanding in him. How can we be called to be kings and priests? A king has his law. If you are on the naked side of the usufruct not one of the laws of State apply, but all of God's Law applies. therefore you are bound only by your conscience.

Now this can't be Scriptural can it? I think so: Regarding CONSCIENCE: Rom_2:15 Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;) Rom_9:1 I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost, Rom_13:5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. 1Co_8:10 For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol's temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols;

2Co_1:12 For our rejoicing is this, the testimony of our conscience, that in simplicity and godly sincerity, not with fleshly wisdom, but by the grace of God, we have had our conversation in the world, and more abundantly to youward. 2Co_4:2 But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God. 1Ti_1:5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned: 1Ti_1:19 Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck: 1Ti_3:9 Holding the mystery of the faith in a pure conscience. ---------------------Regarding LIBERTY in Christ: 1Co_8:9 But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak. Gal_5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. Heb 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; Heb 2:15 And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage

Is there anything to Fear? Yes! Fear the one who holds your Soul in the palm of His hand - fear not his Agent for Ha Satan was not able to touch one hair on Job's head until Yehovah removed his Fence around Job.

What say ye? Are you fanning the fire within? Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

===========================

Again I ask where are the Preacher who will stand in the Gap and teach the flock both Scripture and Law which is to say exactly the same thing? Eze 22:30 And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none. Therefore lacking one who would stand before Yehovah - and the Government will be upon his shoulder, what is on your shoulder? And since no-one would self govern then the State will do it for you. And since not one would be found then the Agent would gain standing in default - See Jeremiah 35. Jer 35:18 And Jeremiah said unto the house of the Rechabites, Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Because ye have obeyed the commandment of Jonadab your father, and kept all his precepts, and done

according unto all that he hath commanded you: Jer 35:19 Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Jonadab the son of Rechab shall not want a man to stand before me for ever.

Pray tell who are the Recabites? This would be important yes? 1Ch 2:55 And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab. Now then, who are the Kenites? H7017 qeyny qyny Patronymic from H7014; a Kenite or member of the tribe of Kajin: - Kenite. H7014 qayin kah'-yin The same as H7013 (with a play upon the affinity to H7069); Kajin, the name of the first child,

The Kenites are the POSTERITY of Cain [anglosized]. Remember dear reader there was a mark placed upon Cain: Gen 4:15 And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him. H226 'oth oth Probably from H225 (in the sense of appearing); a signal (literally or figuratively), as a flag, beacon, monument, omen, prodigy, evidence, etc.: - mark, miracle, (en-) sign, token.

CHOICE MUST EXIST. But the only one who can effect judgement for reward or hurt is the Chooser! Therefore as Mosheh [Moses] said "

Deu_30:15 See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil; Deu_30:19 I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:

Deu_24:16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin. Eze 18:2 What mean ye, that ye use this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge?

Eze 18:3 As I live, saith the Lord GOD, ye shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel. Eze 18:4 Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.

Choose ye this day. Heb 3:7 Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, To day if ye will hear his voice, Heb 3:8 Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness: Heb 3:9 When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years. Heb 3:10 Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways. Heb 3:11 So I sware in my wrath, They shall not enter into my rest.) --------------Heb 3:6 But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end. For the race is long and one who gives up the race will not finish it. Lot's wife looked back - the plowman with his back to the plow is told NOT TO LOOK BACK - for how will his furrow be straight? Shalom, Michael Joseph

Wow, amazing what comes back...see this quote from a major controlling banking interest - said quote issued in 1863 - Remember our discussion regarding Lincoln?

Here is the quote:

The few who understand the system, will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its
favors that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantageswill bear its burden without complaint, and perhaps without suspecting that the system is inimical to their best interests.

How many of you had to endure men and women this past week whining about Obama and this so called health care tax? Don't you know it does not apply to you? somebody asked about walking on water [Admiralty]. Why is Admiralty Law binding on the Whole World? This is why:

Rev 17:15 And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.

L.D. wrote:

In My Humble Opinion

So then if one gets hauled into court and the judge calls the case, STATE OF COLORADO vs. FIRST MIDDLE LAST it is the fiction STATE OF COLORADO vs. the cestue que trust, so the man that is the beneficiary of the trust has an interest in the goings on of the trust and enters the case as a third party intervener with an interest. Why does the man have an interest in the trust even though he does not have a social security number? Because the cestue que trust the debtor, is what the government gave the people the creditors, to discharge the charges when they took the money out of circulation? When a charge is made against the debtor the proceeds of the charge/interest on the debt go to the creditor. The STATE OF COLORADO is merely a conduit to transfer the proceeds/interest on the debt to from the debtor to the creditor.
MJ comments: concepts. Your insight is amazing. But lets me once again nail down for those who are new to these

The term beneficiary has a more technical term that being "Cestui Que Trust" Let me find the Legal meaning in Bouvier's Law Dictionary LEGAL. That which is according to law. It is used in opposition to equitable, as the legal estate is, in the trustee, the equitable estate in the cestui que trust. Vide Powell on Mortg. Index, h. t. Lets be careful and not read over that word "in" as the equity is IN the cestui que trust. BENEFICIAL INTEREST. That right which a person has in a contract made with another; as if A makes a contract with B that he will pay C a certain sum of money, B has the legal interest in the contract, and C the beneficial interest. Hamm. on Part. 6, 7, 25 2 Bulst. 70. BENEFICIARY. This term is frequently used as synonymous with the technical phrase cestui que trust. (q. v.) These TERMS are important as they go directly to what is Legal and what is NOT legal. For instance if Yehovah's Word says if you do something then cursings will befall you, and then one in Yisra'el does that thing, well what would you expect to happen? Do you expect that since that one in Yisra'el is a member of that body that cursings will not befall that one? Hardly, for the Word is Lawful and Legal and a Word once issued from a King will not return in vain. Do not take the name of Yehovah your Elohim in vain. Now consider that President Lincoln was able thru his Administration to purchase all of the Labor of the people in Advance. See the Contract? The people Pledged their labour - that pledge is binding on the Heirs - said pledge was made in good faith - full faith and the labour was CREDITED to the State. Then President Lincoln took that Property. All Stop. That Property = the Credit = the full faith and credit of the people = value, hereinafter "That Property" Continuing...

Then President Lincoln took That Property and placed it into Trust. This is a Public Trust.

USUFRUCT, civil law. The right of enjoying a thing, the property of which is vested in another, and to draw from the same all the profit, utility and advantage which it may produce, provided it be without altering the substance of the thing. 2. The obligation of not altering the substance of the thing, however, takes place only in the case of a complete usufruct. 3. Usufructs are of two kinds; perfect and imperfect. Perfect usufruct, which is of things which the usufructuary can enjoy without altering their substance, though their substance may be diminished or deteriorated naturally by time or by the use to which they are applied; as a house, a piece of land, animals, furniture and other movable effects. Imperfect or quasi usufruct, which is of things which would be useless to the usufructuary if be did not consume and expend them, or change the substance of them, as money, grain, liquors. Civ. Code of Louis. art. 525, et seq.; 1 Browne's Civ. Law, 184; Poth. Tr. du Douaire, n. 194; Ayl. Pand. 319; Poth. Pand. tom. 6, p. 91; Lecons El. du Dr. Civ. Rom. 414 Inst. lib. 2, t. 4; Dig. lib. 7, t. 1, 1. 1 Code, lib. 3, t. 33; 1 Bouv. Inst. Theolo. ps. 1, c. 1, art. 2, p. 76. USUFRUCTUARY, civil law. One who has the right and enjoyment of an usufruct. 2. Domat, with his usual clearness, points out the duties of the usufructuary, which are, 1. To make an inventory of the things subject to the usu-fruct, in the presence of those having an interest in them. 2. To give secur-ity for their restitution; when the usufruct shall be at an end. 3. To take good care of the things subject to the usufruct. 4. To pay all taxes, and claims which arise while the thing is in his possession, as a ground-rent. 5. To keep the thing in repair at his own expense. Lois Civ. liv. 1, t. 11, s. 4. See Estate for life.

----This was prior to the decision in 1913 to grant the Federal Reserve banking a 20 year charter. But notice at that time there were no birth certificates as that is another trust that is soon to come. While paper money was in circulation, that basis of that money prior to 1933 was that it could be redeemed in silver or gold. Now I may not have my dates exact, but you get the gist. A day came when that redemption was removed by operation of law. And that is where things get interesting. Consider the Year of Crisis by F.D.R. he made a very interesting statement which I shall paraphrase as I can't seem to find it at this moment: "If we can persuade the people to deposit their salary checks into our newly formed trust accounts we will have made great progress." What on earth is he talking about? Notice that a manufactured Great Depression has just occurred and the nations peoples are mostly out of work, I believe if memory serves me some where around 30% of the men had no work. Government had already been pledged the good faith and credit as That Property had already been placed into Trust. But along comes this Great Depression and the people are begging, in desperation, for anything to feed their stomachs - they, the people were brought to a condition where they would accept ANY offer. Any student of history knows it was not the United States Government that did the thing but it was done by banking interests MANIPULATING a system. Does this sound eerily familiar? A small people who will plague the world until the going down of the sun - end of the Age. But I digress.

At this point, the U.S. Government issues a decree upon the people demanding that the people exchange their wealth for what? What was the value that Government would give the DOMESTIC people. I use the term domestic to show that the Government has TWO faces. One that deals with International affairs and one that deals with Domestic affairs. What did the U.S. Government trade for the consideration of the wealth of the people? If you think nothing, then you are a Slave and enjoy your chains. Because, if you go down that path then you are absent free will and indeed you are a slave. There had to be consideration - and there was! The U.S. Government is holding the full faith and credit of the people IN Trust. Now, the people are being required to relinquish their gold. Why could the U.S. Gov do that? Because the FULL faith and credit means both Goods and Services are pledged as COLLATERAL. But now is the turning point. This is where Up becomes Down. Forget what happened before Lincoln and what you have been taught in Grade School because what has been taught in grade school is a 1/2 truth. I say 1/2 because if you are on the side of the "flying scroll" in de son tort trustee, then all of the prison erected in General Assembly applies and is binding law upon your office. Before I consider the other half lets nail down what F.D.R. was talking about so that you might comprehend how far the banking interests had taken over. F.D.R. knew that the U.S. Government had to issue Certificates of Trust to the Beneficiaries and that would be coming shortly; however, what they actually did was to TEACH the people to Tort the system and in doing so the people Voluntarily did a thing that was unlawful and by law, the people became the Trustees for the system and therefore the people were handed the bill to pay a second time for what was already theirs. This is very important. Re-read if you did not get it. The people were to be given a Cert of Trust that they could make a use of to set off debt. But instead the banking interests Taught the people to remain in commerce just as they always had. Meaning the people remained as Tenants, trustees at law. But in fact, the U.S. Gov was the Trustee and when the people acted as the Trustee in their ignorance they made a Tort against the U.S. Government and therefore the people, in mass, were in insurrection and therefore they had become the Enemy of the United States Government. This is what the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act is all about. The people are the Enemy because they are in Rebellion. You MUST read the Lieber Code and you must understand that since we have been in a State of Emergency the conquering Army has NEVER left the battlefield. Therefore the Admiral sits in Court issuing PRIVILEGES because there are NO rights in Admiralty. This is the TECHNOLOGY OF BAALAM - a Voluntary choice. Oh I know many here will complain and say what choice. You testify against yourself - kiss the paddle and get on with it. Lets take a quick tangent. I served in the Navy for ten years. I can tell you without any doubt in my mind that the Captain is the beginning and the end of the Law at sea. The Captain has his Court, just like a King, and the Court is called "Captains Mast". There is no jury, there are no rights to remain silent, there is just Answer the Question or be held in

Contempt." Does this sound familiar? But again I digress. Back to the other side of the story: The part where you realized you had been given a very valuable Trust Receipt but that you were told DO NOT USE THIS RECEIPT AS IDENTIFICATION. Now what have we been conditioned to do? We run out just as mommy and daddy did, in their ignorance and we take that receipt and we APPLY for a Social Security Number. Can you see that the action of using that receipt to get a SSN is an act of one who is a trustee? But you are NOT the trustee. Let me put you into remembrance: Term: DE SON TORT TRUSTEE means: PersonPerson who is not a partyparty to a trust agreementtrust agreement (and has no authorityauthority as a trusteetrustee) but meddles with the trust propertytrust property or takes upon himself or herself to carry out actsacts characteristiccharacteristic of the officeoffice of trustee. Instead of prosecuting this person, the courtscourts may hold him or her to be a constructiveconstructive trustee and, thereby, impose the liabilitiesliabilities of an actual trustee in accountingaccounting for his or her acts. 'De son torttort' is Latin for, by his (her) own wrongdoing. Trustees take orders from Administration. Remember the Corporation that has been trying to teach you how this works? The Corporation has 1)shareholders, 2)Board of Directors and 3) Employees/Officers. A trust has 1)Beneficiaries, 2)Board of Directors and 3)Trustees Pray tell who carries out the orders in a corporation? Isn't that an Employee? Who effects the policies for said Corporation? Isn't that the Board of Directors [=Administration]; and who gets the profits or said Corporation? That would be the Shareholders. Returning the other 1/2. You have been given a Trust Receipt, BUT you are NOT the Trustee or the Beneficiary. You are not even a party to this trust. You did not create it therefore you cannot argue for it. That is why the court can hear ANY matter regarding that trust. The U.S. Government created it. But you say no it didn't the State of Florida did. Please try to keep up. All fifty states have long since bowed a knee to the United States in fact this was done as early as 1789. That is EASILY shown. In fact I think I already did in previous issues. So then do you now see the very fine line the attorner [not a spelling error] walks. All of the Estate is yours at any time. But the moment you Act in and for the MICHAEL JOSEPH SURNAME, then you are Trustee and guess what you get stuck holding the bill. Let us now go back to the beginning. Are you holding a Driver's License? Do you have Access to a SSN? These are evidence of an act of a trustee and the acts CAN be binding on the children IF and ONLY if the children continue in them. Otherwise the children do not answer for the sins of their father. ATTORN: to transfer or alien from one feudal lord to another. The premise is this: It goes back to WARD. But if you are ready to take Full Liability for your Acts as a king and priest walking according to the PEACEMAKER - blessed be the peacemaker - for all the estate is mine sayeth Yehovah and you are just strangers and

sojourners with me. If you can go and sell everything you own and lose your life then you will gain your life. Amazing how those Scriptures apply to this day. But consider that daddy is made to transfer his guilt upon his son and the son upon his son, so that when it comes time for Johnny to perform, Johnny will perform and daddy will be proud. All one big happy family each and everyone sharing in the same misery. "Sir, I am not going to ask you again, WHAT IS YOUR LAST NAME?" Therefore a mistake can always been undone. For what do the Scriptures say? My son you have returned go prepare a kid, bring a fine robe for my son who was lost is now found. Therefore, when we resurrect our mind from an ignorant state we can go as the peacemaker according to Scripture - 1) in private 2) with a witness and 3) to the Church. And who pray tell do you suppose the Church is? Thanks to D.M. I see the Church as the Public.
D.M. wrote: Judah, in its completion indeed consisted of Judah the King, Levi the Priesthood and Benjamin the People.

Why would I first go in private? Because this is a HUGE state secret. The entire system is constructed on the "de son tort trustee". What I did not tell you in my previous issue is when I said "Open" and I was called to the Bar, I got very close to the DA and whispered, I am not here to grandstand for what I have to say needs to remain private. But my expressed words in writing now matched my implied trust in action. I was not going to bring down this house of cards, but it is not my will that matters but God's Will. Gal 4:1 Now I say, That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all; Gal 4:2 But is under tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father.

Gal 4:3 Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world: It is not my position to educate those who will not help themselves. If they remain in ignorance due to greed, ego or any other number or reasons, well so be it. I am called to walk as EXAMPLE - in the Commonwealth of Yisra'el - an open society. Finance is just ONE of the four powers in the Earth - Religion, Politics and Education being the other three of the four horns. And the Rule shall be upon His Shoulder - What is on your shoulder? Is it not your head? If you will abide in me, I will abide in you. Are the Laws of Yehovah written upon your mind/heart? Are they not a SEAL in your forehead such that you express said seal in your hand. Said another way are you IN covenant with the Strong man of the house - Aleph Tav. If you are then you rule your dominion and State is nothing but a Servicing Agent of the Usufruct. With your eyes [two] that see both good and evil - you choose the good - where the good is The Word of God - in those days those who call upon my name shall be Saved. Comes now Michael Joseph in the name of Yehoshuah the Aleph Tav the beginning and the

end, to requisition state property for my use as evidenced in the copy of the attached Trust Certificate - please give me details of where and when I may begin to make a use of said property. That is the language of a beneficiary IN the usufruct. If you think the idea of Usufruct was foreign to the makers of the United States you would be wrong. Thomas Jefferson to James Madison

2 Popular Basis of Political Authority

Thomas Jefferson to James Madison
6 Sept. 1789Papers 15:392--97

I sit down to write to you without knowing by what occasion I shall send my letter. I do it because a subject comes into my head which I would wish to develope a little more than is practicable in the hurry of the moment of making up general dispatches. The question Whether one generation of men has a right to bind another, seems never to have been started either on this or our side of the water. Yet it is a question of such consequences as not only to merit decision, but place also, among the fundamental principles of every government. The course of reflection in which we are immersed here on the elementary principles of society has presented this question to my mind; and that no such obligation can be so transmitted I think very capable of proof.-I set out on this ground, which I suppose to be self evident,"that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living": that the dead have neither powers nor rights over it. The portion occupied by an individual ceases to be his when himself ceases to be, and reverts to the society. If the society has formed no rules for the appropriation of it's lands in severality, it will be taken by the first occupants. These will generally be the wife and children of the decedent. If they have formed rules of appropriation, those rules may give it to the wife and children, or to some one of them, or to the legatee of the deceased. So they may give it to his creditor. But the child, the legatee, or creditor takes it, not by any natural right, but by a law of the society of which they are members, and to which they are subject. Then no man can, by natural right, oblige the lands he occupied, or the persons who succeed him in that occupation, to the paiment of debts contracted by him. For if he could, he might, during his own life, eat up the usufruct of the lands for several generations to come, and then the lands would belong to the dead, and not to the living, which would be the reverse of our principle. -------------------------------I intend to pursue this line of reasoning to the Governor and General [Attorney/Postmaster] and perhaps even to the Vatican. Why do I need law books when I have the Word of Yehovah = The Law Book. I own nothing, I control nothing save my thoughts - I am content to make a Use of Property according to my needs whereby I can Minister in Service to my brothers and sisters. I believe with all my being that is the calling. To bring the harvest into the barn - for the branch that does not bear fruit is cut off. But how can one bear fruit if one is ignorant? Therefore

the Word says Study to show thyself approved; and, Luk 12:28 If then God so clothe the grass, which is to day in the field, and to morrow is cast into the oven; how much more will he clothe you, O ye of little faith? Luk 12:29 And seek not ye what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink, neither be ye of doubtful mind. Luk 12:30 For all these things do the nations of the world seek after: and your Father knoweth that ye have need of these things. Luk 12:31 But rather seek ye the kingdom of God; and all these things shall be added unto you. Luk 12:32 Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom. Commentary: "little flock" = Election = the Elder son Luk 12:33 Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth corrupteth. Luk 12:34 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. -----------------------------One may ask so you have laid a foundation, what of practical application. To that one I will say Abraham was justified by his WORKS. He exercised his faith which is a Deed recorded in the Heavens. Therefore noone can tell you how, you must walk in your own path. For I cannot do it for you was the answer Abraham gave to the rich man. Luk 16:26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence. When MICHAEL JOSEPH SURNAME is called, I have no standing to act for it. But finding that I insist on being the trustee, the Judge may ask do I want an attorney or shall I be granted a limited license to practice law in their PRIVATE forum. I cannot pass thru the Bar [gulf] without trespassing - and if I insist on trespassing, then I will be made to settle the charge. On the other hand, if I return the usufruct to State in confidence, then I will be greeted with smiles - and the other side will return "We got this, have a nice day." For one who refuses to govern his own affairs will be governed; and therefore the principal is simple. Knowledge will always govern Ignorance. For you engineer types, here is a neat model. The reason the national debt keeps going up and up and up.....is because: The charge is being stored upon an unlimited capacitor and the capacitor is not being allowed to discharge the charge back to source. Therefore the battery is not being recharged and the

debt increases. The only way to send the charge back to source is to make a Redemption possible. Isa 52:1 Awake, awake; put on thy strength, O Zion; put on thy beautiful garments, O Jerusalem, the holy city: for henceforth there shall no more come into thee the uncircumcised and the unclean. Isa 52:2 Shake thyself from the dust; arise, and sit down, O Jerusalem: loose thyself from the bands of thy neck, O captive daughter of Zion. Isa 52:3 For thus saith Yehovah, Ye have sold yourselves for nought; and ye shall be redeemed without money. Back to notes: Notes are a reflection of one who is on the WRONG side of the equation. For what is going on is there are TWO books but we can either be on the right side of the Usufruct in Peace or the wrong side as an Enemy. How much Chastisement is necessary? Isa 1:3 The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master's crib: but Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider. Isa 1:4 Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the LORD, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward. Isa 1:5 Why should ye be stricken any more? ye will revolt more and more: the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. Isa 1:19 If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land: Isa 1:20 But if ye refuse and rebel, ye shall be devoured with the sword: for the mouth of Yehovah hath spoken it. And that friends is a decree from a King and let me assure you His Word has not come back in vain - just look around you. The sword that devours is The Word of God for it is Lawful and Legal and it will not be overturned and it reigns and rules and controls. For as Mosheh said behold I set before you life and death - choose life. If you think me crazy then answer me this, when you get done looking at your own life and others around you, answer me why all of the cursings? Then I should like to point you to the Legal nature of Yehovah's Word - you can find it in the codified book of The Law at Deuteronomy 27 and Deuteronomy 28. I used to get very angry over this stuff, but now I see that I was the problem. I was the one in insurrection and rebellion. I shall return the usufruct to the proper usufructuary.

MICHAEL JOSEPH SURNAME, property of the United States Government. Leah and Rachel. But Wisdom is the principal woman - Sarah - princess; she is the Heavenly Eve - Wisdom = Rachel Wisdom dwells with Prudence = Rachel and Bilhah yielding Knowledge and Understand = Leah and Zilpah

Pro 8:1 Doth not wisdom cry? and understanding put forth her voice? Pro 8:2 She standeth in the top of high places, by the way in the places of the paths.

Pro 8:3 She crieth at the gates, at the entry of the city, at the coming in at the doors. Pro 8:4 Unto you, O men, I call; and my voice is to the sons of man. Pro 8:5 O ye simple, understand wisdom: and, ye fools, be ye of an understanding heart. Pro 8:6 Hear; for I will speak of excellent things; and the opening of my lips shall be right things. Pro 8:7 For my mouth shall speak truth; and wickedness is an abomination to my lips. Pro 8:8 All the words of my mouth are in righteousness; there is nothing froward or perverse in them. Pro 8:9 They are all plain to him that understandeth, and right to them that find knowledge. Pro 8:10 Receive my instruction, and not silver; and knowledge rather than choice gold. Pro 8:11 For wisdom is better than rubies; and all the things that may be desired are not to be compared to it. Pro 8:12 I wisdom dwell with prudence, and find out knowledge of witty inventions. Pro 8:13 The fear [comment by MJ = Reference or Love or Deep Respect] of Yehovah is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate. Pro 8:14 Counsel is mine, and sound wisdom: I am understanding; I have strength. Pro 8:15 By me kings reign, and princes decree justice. Pro 8:16 By me princes rule, and nobles, even all the judges of the earth. Pro 8:17 I love them that love me; and those that seek me early shall find me.

Pro 8:18 Riches and honour are with me; yea, durable riches and righteousness. Pro 8:19 My fruit is better than gold, yea, than fine gold; and my revenue than choice silver. Pro 8:20 I lead in the way of righteousness, in the midst of the paths of judgment: Pro 8:21 That I may cause those that love me to inherit substance; and I will fill their treasures. Pro 8:22 Yehovah possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.

Pro 8:23 I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was. Pro 8:24 When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water. Pro 8:25 Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth: Pro 8:26 While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world. Pro 8:27 When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth: Pro 8:28 When he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the fountains of the deep: Pro 8:29 When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth: Pro 8:30 Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him; Pro 8:31 Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; and my delights were with the sons of men. Pro 8:32 Now therefore hearken unto me, O ye children: for blessed are they that keep my ways. Pro 8:33 Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it not. Pro 8:34 Blessed is the man that heareth me, watching daily at my gates, waiting at the posts of my doors. Pro 8:35 For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the LORD. Pro 8:36 But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.

The nature of my signature is my Thumbprint with the Tav, an X, symbolizing Covenant Relationship in the name of Yehoshuah. For why would I think so highly of myself as to make a Surname in FLATTERING TITLE. I prefer the heavenly reward - Son of God. Job 32:22 For I know not to give flattering titles; in so doing my maker would soon take me away. If you do not comprehend the foregoing, then I suggest, to quote a pastor that I study with, "Put it on the shelf". This is not my process or any other man's process. The root of this presentment is to take Full Liability for yourself. How then will you rely on my process if you claim Full Liability. That would be double minded, yes?

I know for a lot of you this discussion may as well be about quantum physics as it is so foreign. I guarantee you that this very stuff we are discussing is the difference between the PERCEPTION of slavery and a freeman. For I love a quote from a book I am reading now : to the love it or leave it crowd: "The man standing waist deep in crap looks over to the man neck deep and says, well its not so bad for me." A man longing for freedom disregards both estates and looks for another way. Before I issue today's communication I will ask the questions: Where are the pastors who teach the sheep both Law and Scripture? Why have the people fallen into a great slumber? How can a people escape the trappings of law forms when they are blind to the law forms being used against them? And finally, who cannot see a conspiracy to "dumb down" the people thru systematic programming - effectuated primarily by the Public School system but secondarily by the greatest mind control device ever known to man - the Television? I have heard some say that the term Legal is somehow evil. I do not accept statement. I student of the Word of God will notice that Yehovah is Righteous and Just. Meaning if the Word says you have a blessing coming if you meet the requirement, then you have a blessing coming, but You must meet the requirement to qualify for said blessing. If the word says you have a cursing coming, then you have a cursing coming, and You brought that curse upon your own head. Judgment issued from within your own actions or lack thereof. Therefore returning to Numbers 24-26 a third party cannot curse you. You can only curse yourself. This is the technology that Baalam taught Barak. And God's Word is true and a King's Word cannot be annulled once issued. How many examples of this fact do you need in Scripture? How about Darius, Nebuchadnezzar, how about Herod? See now the Legal aspect of the Word? Once the DECLARATION OF TRUST has been issued it cannot be annulled. In other words, the Tav is known by the Aleph. Revelation is just a restatement of Genesis.

But that is not what I am bent to discuss today, i want to go back to principals and build on a solid foundation. Lev 25:23 The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with me. Lev 25:24 And in all the land of your possession ye shall grant a redemption for the land. Now who amongst you can see the legal terms found within these two verses? And what do said terms mean? Proceeding..... Land: means what is already constructed and what will be constructed, it means the ground and what is beneath the ground to the center of the earth. How can I know that? Because Yehovah told me. He said the Land is mine. Now from when did all come from? How many God's are there? Therefore All came from I AM THAT I AM. Can we comprehend that I AM has titles for different Acts? We have been down this road before but to refresh. Yah = I AM Elohim = I AM, as Creator Yehovah = I AM, in Covenant - Lawgiver Yehoshuah = Yehovah Saves Now then if Yah was Self Existing One, then the Earth and all there is in it belongs to Yehovah - for those who desire to jump ahead in Grant - slow down a bit... We are told not to trespass our neighbors as in do unto others as we would have done unto ourselves, therefore, Land must extend to the Center of the Earth and no further; else that would be trespass. Possession: Now if the Land is not ours but belongs to Yah, then what of Ownership and Possession? To possess mean to control who can USE the land for what purpose. Therefore the only estate left for man has to be interests in Use. Meaning who has the right to use. Now then, lets consider that Yisra'el requested a man-king. They could not demand from their King anything but they requested as a benefit upon them. The request was granted and Yisra'el put all rights, title and interests into said king. Fast forward, the king in BRiTian [see it Contract man as in BRT is Hebrew for Contract] granted to State. In other words, United Estates does not exist absent the throne in BRiTian. But see that all rights, titles and interests are held by the state by grant from a king. Chain of title as it were. But what title exactly are we discussing? The ONLY title available to Man is USUFRUCT. So then what is Usufruct? That is the Right

to Enjoy the Property that is vested in another. Well now, do you enjoy your existence on this Earth? The property, Earth, is vested in Yah. Now we can go back to the king and state. Because to get there, we must comprehend Grant. For the Property, LAND, belongs to Yah. Therefore again, the only possible Trust Corpus is the "Right of Use". Now then, lets fast forward a bit to 1933 ish. The people are being told by Officers of State to surrender their gold under pain. For that transfer consideration had to be present. What is the consideration? USUFRUCT, civil law. The right of enjoying a thing, the property of which is vested in another, and to draw from the same all the profit, utility and advantage which it may produce, provided it be without altering the substance of the thing. 2. The obligation of not altering the substance of the thing, however, takes place only in the case of a complete usufruct. 3. Usufructs are of two kinds; perfect and imperfect. Perfect usufruct, which is of things which the usufructuary can enjoy without altering their substance, though their substance may be diminished or deteriorated naturally by time or by the use to which they are applied; as a house, a piece of land, animals, furniture and other movable effects. Imperfect or quasi usufruct, which is of things which would be useless to the usufructuary if be did not consume and expend them, or change the substance of them, as money, grain, liquors. Civ. Code of Louis. art. 525, et seq.; 1 Browne's Civ. Law, 184; Poth. Tr. du Douaire, n. 194; Ayl. Pand. 319; Poth. Pand. tom. 6, p. 91; Lecons El. du Dr. Civ. Rom. 414 Inst. lib. 2, t. 4; Dig. lib. 7, t. 1, 1. 1 Code, lib. 3, t. 33; 1 Bouv. Inst. Theolo. ps. 1, c. 1, art. 2, p. 76. USUFRUCTUARY, civil law. One who has the right and enjoyment of an usufruct. 2. Domat, with his usual clearness, points out the duties of the usufructuary, which are, 1. To make an inventory of the things subject to the usu-fruct, in the presence of those having an interest in them. 2. To give secur-ity for their restitution; when the usufruct shall be at an end. 3. To take good care of the things subject to the usufruct. 4. To pay all taxes, and claims which arise while the thing is in his possession, as a ground-rent. 5. To keep the thing in repair at his own expense. Lois Civ. liv. 1, t. 11, s. 4. See Estate for life. people: Full faith and credit by SURRENDERING the Usufruct to the Usufructuary. Usufructuary = the State State: Hold all titles and even hold the Usufruct Now if the State holds the FULL TITLE = legal and equitable title in the Usufruct - which it does, then the only office left to man is naked possession. Which means, there is no claim to ownership. You only want the benefit of the Usufruct. Remember Nebuchadnezzar - ?

Dan 4:29 At the end of twelve months he walked in the palace of the kingdom of Babylon. Dan 4:30 The king spake, and said, Is not this great Babylon, that I [1st time] have built for the house of the kingdom by the might of my [2nd time] power, and for the honour of my [3rd time] majesty? Dan 4:31 While the word was in the king's mouth, there fell a voice from heaven, saying, O king Nebuchadnezzar, to thee it is spoken; The kingdom is departed from thee. Now, then the MIN-O-SAUR crowd claiming property belongs to them is in conflict with the Officers of State who hold the USUFRUCT in Trust, as the Usufructuary. By the way if the foregoing terms seem foreign to you, well that is by design. You have systematically been dumbed down thru the public school system and by your preachers to basically function at a level of clerk. Meaning you take and receive orders. If you think me wrong, then consider the public school system. Does it teach the children to THINK or do the children get taught to regurgitate information that was given to them? you know it is the latter, which is exactly what a clerk does. The clerk takes your order and fulfills it. Moving on.. What is this term Naked? Have you ever considered what the term NAKED means in regard to law? Lets go to the Garden of Eden. Eth-ha-aw-dawm and Chavvah disobeyed Yehovah, meaning dear reader, that law was indeed long in the Earth before Sinai, and they choose another lawgiver, in Satan. Therefore they were "outlaws" to Yehovah and stood Naked before Yehovah without the Law. Now if I haven't pushed your buttons yet, this is surely to do it. You are not and will NEVER be a part of the United States - NEVER - End of Story. How did those fireworks make you feel? Patriotic, right? That is by design! History: 55 men with private estates pledged their estates to form the United States. The United States unincorporated corporation vested with 55 private estates as surety pledged those assets to COVER the failing United States of America. Back to 1933: Where everything gets flipped around. There are so many tangents but lets go back to Scripture because you must see the small people who always cozy up to the king [power]. Rev 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. Rev 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. Num_24:21 And he looked on the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwellingplace, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock.

1Ch_2:55 And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab. For the intrepid go check out Jeremiah 35 - who did they invite? = the Rachabites! So that you can see the word SCRIBE lets make it plain what these are: H5608 saphar A primitive root; properly to score with a mark as a tally or record, that is, (by implication) to inscribe, and also to enumerate; intensively to recount, that is, celebrate: - commune, (ac-) count, declare, number, + penknife, reckon, scribe, shew forth, speak, talk, tell (out), writer. These so called Scribes are bankers! Next time you go down town and you are wondering who runs the show - LOOK UP. Remember Tyre, that small rock, off the coast of Zidon? That small rock was the ancient commercial center of the World! Situated for international shipping - so what is new under the sun? They sing the same advertisements this day. So lets see if the program is being spread over the entire earth. Remember now the Technology of Baalam - you create your own prison. Zec 5:1 Then I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a flying roll. Zec 5:2 And he said unto me, What seest thou? And I answered, I see a flying roll; the length thereof is twenty cubits, and the breadth thereof ten cubits. Zec 5:3 Then said he unto me, This is the curse that goeth forth over the face of the whole earth: for every one that stealeth shall be cut off as on this side according to it; and every one that sweareth shall be cut off as on that side according to it. breaking down verse 3: for every one that stealeth shall be cut off as on this side according to it; Commentary: This is the MIN-O-SAUR. Remember Nebuchadnezzar? I saw one this morning as I stared into the mirror. No, it just is not so. But look the one claiming ownership is the USURPER - for the State is SERVICING AGENT of the Usufruct. Therefore the one saying I am going to remove property from the State is a domestic terrorist. This side is interesting to me. Because an entire prison without bars has been erected for these. Said prison is called the General Assembly - in Admiralty - Law of the High Seas controlled by appointed Captains for those who would TAKE and CLAIM property against the Estate. This is Roman Civil Law - I bet you thought Rome was no more. You would be wrong! The Emperor of Rome is the Head of the Holy Roman Catholic Church. He has many titles as well.

How much chastisement is necessary? The Minosaur is a Thief. For in fact, he steals or attempts to steal from the Public Trust. And this one is Lost at Sea - in the Admiralty Money. Don't you know money is property of State. and every one that sweareth shall be cut off as on that side according to it. Commentary: This is the State Officer who is supposed to be Servant to dispense the Usufruct, but because Up is DownUp is Down, the Servant with the "help" and "guidance" of the small people have become master. Therefore the one who sweareth [an OATH] is in office of trust to oversee the Enjoyment of the Usufruct. Now then, forgive us our Trespasses as we forgive those who Trespass against us. We the men and women private absent Oath of Office have access to the Usufruct, but ONLY by giving away the Stone, going and selling everything we have and with eyes on Yehoshuah we walk in The Way. For the she said "Today, if you will hear His voice"... -----------------------------Now there had to be a recording of the Deed [event] and this is formalized in the Birth Certificate [Berth] which is Certificate that, in my opinion, must be redeemed by the office that issued it, which would be the Registrar. Now, then the Enjoyment of the Estate is done by Right which is a Right in the INTEREST of the Usufruct. For the minosaur must return the Usufruct [the only estate available to man] to the Usufructuary and stop claiming ownership in conflict with those holding the Usufruct in Trust. Say what do you call the office of one who Usurps the Trustee? That would be Trustee de son Tort. Term: DE SON TORT TRUSTEE means: PersonPerson who is not a partyparty to a trust agreementtrust agreement (and has no authorityauthority as a trusteetrustee) but meddles with the trust propertytrust property or takes upon himself or herself to carry out actsacts characteristiccharacteristic of the officeoffice of trustee. Instead of prosecuting this person, the courtscourts may hold him or her to be a constructiveconstructive trustee and, thereby, impose the liabilitiesliabilities of an actual trustee in accountingaccounting for his or her acts. 'De son torttort' is Latin for, by his (her) own wrongdoing. Now then if you claim ownership of the Trust Property by taking the Birth Certificate to obtain a Driver's License. All Stop. Licenses are issued by the Captain in Admiralty. There are NO rights in Admiralty - only Privilege. Perhaps the hole got a bit deeper when said one used said license to get a social security number - see that depending on which side of the Usufruct you are on - all must remain Legal. Spiral In or Spiral Out. Spiral In or Spiral Out. Push the Envelope - Watch it Bend.

Furthermore, ALL must conform with the Word of God. And it does. Consider now that TRUE NAME SURNAME - makes a Legal Name. My name is "Michael Joseph". My name is NOT Michael and my name is NOT Joseph and my name is NOT Michael Joseph SURNAME. My name is Michael Joseph. It is a matter of Identity, it always has been. Job 32:21 Let me not, I pray you, accept any man's person, neither let me give flattering titles unto man. Job 32:22 For I know not to give flattering titles; in so doing my maker would soon take me away. H3655 kanah A primitive root; to address by an additional name; hence, to eulogize: - give flattering titles, surname (himself). Lets put the rubber to the Road shall we? The name MICHAEL JOSEPH SURNAME is a Legal Name but it is MORE than that it is a Trust. And guess what I have Zero Proprietary interest in it. I said Proprietary interest, I did not say I have zero interest. I did not create it. I was talking with a friend today, I need to start recording our conversations because he gets me on a roll and so many light bulbs come on - but nevertheless, I was thinking a few days back of my experience with the DA's in regard to me not having a Driver's License. Most people go to jail for six months but I was met with smiles and a warm greeting. I have gone over this numerous times in my head trying to hash the events thru so that I could comprehend. First off let me say that I believe that the Holy Spirit protects me as I went back and read some of the stuff that I wrote thinking where did this come from. Meaning, whilst I had intention, I did not fully comprehend what I had done. I remember when they called MICHAEL JOSEPH SURNAME that I stood up and said "OPEN". As in "Open says me". Then after roll call, the name was again called. And I was invited to have a discussion privately with the DA. She asked me what I was here today for and I asked her had she seen and reviewed the file? I then told her that the only reason I was there that day was because I gave a man my word; else I would not be there. I then told her that I was there to challenge the jurisdiction of the court to hear the matter. She smiled, and looked me in the eye and said "I can assure you the court has complete jurisdiction to hear this matter." The latter statement has plagued me because I keep asking myself why did not they proceed. And I now have my answer. I returned the Usufruct and said its not mine - i claim in Yehoshuah under Yehoshuah - I like Peter look to Yehoshuah and in doing so the Admiralty is beneath me. But more than that, she was Exactly right. Why? 1. I have no Proprietary interest in MICHAEL JOSEPH SURNAME 2. I have no interest in the Trust Agreement as I am NEITHER Trustee, Director or

Beneficiary 3. I am totally without the Trust Agreement except to say that I have interest in the Usufruct by prior Agreement made without me. Therefore I have ZERO standing in the Trust MICHAEL JOSEPH SURNAME. The system is beautiful in its conception - in terms of its genius. You have to admit that billions of people are completely blind to this system. I was only recently able to grasp what I have written when I read a book - The Pied Piper of Babylon. I believe strongly that the message has been to come out of her O my People, that you do not partake of her sins [debts]. For in two movies now "War Games" and "Tron Legacy" I have heard the line "the only way to win is not to play the game." What was the command to Adam/Eve - have nothing to do with the Tree [man]. Did Yehoshuah argue with the tree [Satan] on the pinnacle above the Holy City? No. What did he do? He quoted the Word of God. Mar 13:9 But take heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you up to councils; and in the synagogues ye shall be beaten: and ye shall be brought before rulers and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them. Mar 13:11 But when they shall lead you, and deliver you up, take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost. ----------------------------------------Now then to those who think me out of my mind - see the attachment given to me by a friend It comes from a book entitled "THE WAY TO OUTDO ENGLAND WITHOUT FIGHTING HER" by Henry C. CAREY. Pay particular attention to pages 129 and 130. Therefore you are allowing the State complete control in the Trust MICHAEL JOSEPH SURNAME because that is the Usufructory interest means the duty of the Servicer, the State, is to extend the Usufruct to you by Right but ONLY upon your redemption of the Trust Receipt. Therefore you agree to grant the full faith and credit, your labour, to the United States and the witness of this FACT is the Dollar which is evidence of a benefit received and exercised and acknowledge by State. Therefore the goods and services of the people are being used as Collateral to issue forth the Notes. Consider that labour is a service and this is the Collateral that was pledged FOR YOU - in other words, you did not Create the Trust - it was made without you. But according to the attached letter said labour was purchased lock stock and barrel - for good or bad - buyer beware. Therefore the State has already bought the farm and then when we do something in ignorance the goal is to get you to Tort the Trustee and therefore you become a "de son tort trustee" and you are stuck holding the bag. But remember the farm has already been bought so why do you pay your lover - consider the book of Lamentations. She is a prostitute that

PAYS her lovers. Consider that now in light of the foregoing. Therefore now back to Lieber Code - you must come to peace - blessed be the peacemakers - so that you are not held in insurrection by the Captain in the Admiralty because the occupying army - you don't think the police wear military rank because it looks good do you? - and it is this army that MUST enforce the relationship but it can only do so for one who has gone to peace and is not battling against the Public Trust. Therefore the signature for Service would be: MICHAEL JOSEPH SURNAME, property of the State of " ". So then, it is true that I am a creditor of the State by and thru my labour which is pledged to the State, but in a sense it is a gift. In fact more than a sense, it is a gift. But for that consideration, I am with a Receipt that is yet to be redeemed, but not for long. Therefore I put my energy into the State and the State has given me a Receipt that I can use to indemnify and discharge debts. There is NO account - this is all done by trust operation thru trust receipts. The term TRUST RECEIPT means: 1. AssetAsset based financingfinancing: MethodMethod used for fundingfunding purchasepurchase of inventoriesinventories of consumer durablesconsumer durables (appliances, automobilesautomobiles), constructionconstruction equipmentequipment, etc. In this arrangementarrangement the bankbank holdsholds the titletitle and the borrowerborrower can sellsell the goodsgoods (and thus repay the loanloan) but is obligated to keep them separate from the other inventory. 2. Documentary creditDocumentary credit: Method whereby a bank allows an importerimporter to take deliverydelivery of imported goods but retains the title to them. This arrangement allows the importer to acquire and sell goods without makingmaking paymentpayment under a letter of creditletter of credit. Forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors Do you pay property taxes? That is evidence that you are a "de son tort trustee". proof? USUFRUCTUARY, civil law. One who has the right and enjoyment of an usufruct. 2. Domat, with his usual clearness, points out the duties of the usufructuary, which are, 1. To make an inventory of the things subject to the usu-fruct, in the presence of those having an interest in them. 2. To give secur-ity for their restitution; when the usufruct shall be at an end. 3. To take good care of the things subject to the usufruct. 4. To pay all taxes, and claims which arise while the thing is in his possession, as a ground-rent. 5. To keep the thing in repair at his own expense. Lois Civ. liv. 1, t. 11, s. 4. See Estate for Want

life. >>> Lam_1:2 She weepeth sore in the night, and her tears are on her cheeks: among all her lovers she hath none to comfort her: all her friends have dealt treacherously with her, they are become her enemies. Lam 1:18 Yehovah is righteous; for I have rebelled against his commandment: hear, I pray you, all people, and behold my sorrow: my virgins and my young men are gone into captivity. Lam_1:19 I called for my lovers, but they deceived me: my priests and mine elders gave up the ghost in the city, while they sought their meat to relieve their souls. ------------------------------------------------------------------------Gal 4:1 Now I say, That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all; Gal 4:2 But is under tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father. Gal 4:3 Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world: The question is can you come to FULL LIABILITY for yourself or will you remain under the tutors and governors in limited liability? I believe, that the state can either be your Servant or your Master. And that relationship is not without me but is rather up to me to DECIDE which one. I had this years ago but lost the link. This is what I am talking about. Blind leading the Blind in darkness - because the Puppeteers have granted theILLUSION OF CONTROLILLUSION OF CONTROL. Thank you David Merrill - that movie is one of my favorites - along with Wag the Dog.

Now back to your regularly scheduled PROGRAMMING - Fox, CNN, CBS, NBC....etc. Programming of Fear that is... THERE ARE NO GIANTS. shalom, Michael Joseph

>>> CONTINUING >>>

Sent: Wednesday, 4 July 2012, 11:22 Subject: Re: Who made Who T.R. wrote: Is not the Constitution a veil that covers admiralty and thus conveys an illusion of freedom and rights for those who would find them there rather than from our creator?

Response: Short answer : yes and no. A constitution is made by one party for another party to engage the latter into commerce to support the first party....the latter party is called a Constitutor.....The former is Surety and take all the liability - unless the latter voluntarily takes the surety in naked endorsement. T.R. wrote: And did not the US, Inc. Supreme Court pull that veil aside this past week when they upheld the power to tax for doing nothing but existing? Response: Short answer : no. T.R. wrote: And does not the health care act require that your flesh body, a creation of Elohim, be delivered to the state for their control in facilitating commerce and for the greater public good by insuring that you do not burden the system through poor choices (freedom) and old age (no longer productive)? So human life is reduced to a simple benefit/cost analysis. Response: Short answer : no, you are not a party, you are a foreignor. The act does not apply to you directly. Indirectly you are correct as, in training, men have been conditioned to your results. But it does not have to be that way. Its nothing personal Jack, its just good business! ====================== MJ's Response: The Constitution was made by 55 men who pledged their personal estates to cover the debts of a failing entity called The United States of America. Let me dig up something from my Archives. I wrote the following document for a friend two years ago:

For the command of this author of this writing and the communication hereon is for an interpretation of all words with the rules of the interpretation of the author, in a positive-sense, in the present-tense, on a level-geometric-plane; and Comes now True Name, in the office of apostle, speaking for his family and estate, a regenerate man in the faith of Yehoshua HMashiach and making a special visitation by absolute ministerial right to the district court, "restricted appearance" with the express intent to make known my repentance and to express my trust; and, I, give notice via this instant communication that I take full liability for my actions; and,

The following information is within my comprehension in regard to the relationship that establishes between men and women and the State which they inhabit; and, allow me to express my comprehension such that The Court and its judge can grasp what I mean by my repentance: I begin my explanation by describing the relationships established between the Sovereign United States and the Union of States [the] United States of America; and, it is my comprehension that [the] United States comprised of a body of men [the true Sovereigns] known as [the] People of the United States and that body of men, hereinafter We the People made a pledge to each other as written in their Declaration of Independence we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor - and We the People declared the torts against their king as they recognized Sovereign power in the king, in my opinion, in conformity with agreements formerly made by the nation of Yisrael [Israel] as codified in the 1611 King James Version at : 1Sa 8:19 Neuerthelesse, the people refused to obey the voyce of Samuel; and they said, Nay, but we will haue a King ouer vs: and possibly in observance of commercial agreements internationally made with or by the Hudson Bay Company or the East India Trading Company and their king; and, said torts codified within the Declaration of Independence were issued with a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind, recognizing that men are with Choice; and given that men were absent the ability to read minds a descent Respect is to make known to others the reasons for their Separation; and, Given that divine law mandates that the debtor is slave to the lender; and, given that the existing union of States were in fact not abiding by their international agreements thereby reducing said States to [dis]united States; and, realizing again that a slave has no right to contract, We the People forming a moral person established a more perfect Union of the States by creating a Constitution for [the] United States of America; whereby the former States, in agreement thru their silence or acquiescence, effectively were reduced to districts of the United States; and, evidence of my assertion can be found in the Federal Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789, c. 20, 28 U.S.C. 72528 U.S.C. 725 which provides: The laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United
States otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law, in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply[.]; and,

Said States being parties to said Constitution made for the United States of America by We the People of [the] United States creates a compact between those parties only; and, no private man has any standing or claim upon said Constitution as no private man was a party to said Constitution; and, my assertions of the foregoing are upheld at Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, hereinafter Padelford; and, Furthermore, within Padelford the United States is clearly dictating to the States as the following quotes come from Padelford:

But the States, by the exercise of the taxing power, can take from their inhabitants every cent the inhabitants can spare, and live. The principle comes to this: that the States, in making the Constitution, intended to give up the power of self-preservation.

On the one hand, then, Congress may convert the General Government into a dictator; on the other, the States have not retained the
power of self-preservation. This is McCulloch vs. Maryland. But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain. If they do, they are entitled to redress. Or they may waive the right to complain. If they do, the right stands waived.; ---Tangent: Did the States complain? Hell no, every single one of them reduced themselves to bondage. Read the North Carolina constitution it clearly says its Officers and Employees will abide by the United States rule. ----And, clearly the makers of the Constitution were We the People; and therefore said unincorporated association We the People are the Sovereignty; and, said Sovereignty is vested in [the] United States from those men who comprised We the People; and, furthermore, the Constitution made for [the] United States of America stipulates at Article III the following: Article III Section 2 The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under (1) this Constitution, (2) the Laws of the United States and (3) Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority ---Tangent: Do you think that attorney's waste words? Words are the strength of the attorney. Do you think the word "under" was written in the foregoing for no reason at all?

-----

And, analyzing the foregoing Article and Section, in light of the Laws of Nations, the fundamental principle is the pot is never greater than the potter as codified in the 1611 King James Version at :
Jer 18:6 O house of Israel, cannot I doe with you as this potter, saith the Lord? Behold, as the clay is in the potters hand, so are ye in mine hand, O house of Israel. And, as such, the Constitution being made for the United States of America stipulates that the States that comprise or make up [Publics] the United States of America are bound by the Constitution, the Laws of the [set apart] United States [as Sovereign] and any international Treaties that the United States, as Sovereign may enjoin itself and thereby bind [the] United States of America by a priori agreement; and, said Treaties are to be made under their Authority whereby the their is the Signatories [ourselves] and the future co-beneficiaries and possibly co-trustees [our Posterity]; and, the term "ourselves" is NOT you and I - for that term was capitalized "Ourselves" and means the Settlors "We the People" - the 55; and, My assertions are maintained at Warren E. ENSMINGER v. THE FARM CREDIT BANK OF WICHITA; First National Bank of Okeene, hereinafter Ensminger; and, reference the following decision coming from a three judge panel: This action was instigated to determine who has the highest title to property located in [Major and Grady] county, Oklahoma Territory state, of which the United States of America by contract, gave up all right, title or interest in said property, without any conditions set forth; and it is very clear by the defendant's pleadings that it is not that entity that is claiming the property, Mr. Butler for Federal Land Bank clearly stated that the claim is the United States, and that Federal Land Bank and First National Bank in Okeene are not of the United States of America[.] and, Clearly Ensminger recognizes the separation of [the] United States and [the] United States of America as being two separate and distinct entities; and, furthermore at Chisholm v. Georgiathe opinions produced the following:

To the Constitution of the United States, the term SOVEREIGN, is totally unknown. There is but one
place where it could have been used with propriety. But even in that place, it would not, perhaps, have comported with the delicacy of those who ordained and established that Constitution. They might have announced themselves "SOVEREIGN" people of the United States. But serenely conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious declaration.; and,

No such ideas obtain here; at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly
the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects (unless the African slaves among us may be so called), and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.; and, Clearly, at Chisholm v. Georgia, the Sovereigns are the Signatories or We the People and those Signatories chose not to employ that term Sovereign [to themselves] probably, in my opinion, as to not awaken the

consciousness of Yisrael in regard to their former agreement codified with the Ever Living at 1 st Samuel 8 in the 1611 King James Version referenced hereinbefore; and, clearly Chisholm v. George notices that the Sovereigns, the Signatories of the new Trust, [the] United States are in fact Sovereigns without Subjects and have none to govern but themselves; however, the ones who would come under the Shade of the new Trust [the] United States [Jonah's Gourd] take the office of citizen and are equal in that office as fellow citizens as joint tenants; and, the citizens of [the] United States of America remain as subjects to the king of England as these never pledged anything, except maybe a pledge to a flag, and therefore never took the necessary steps to set themselves apart in this world; and, in my opinion, these will always be Ruled and Governed as they will most likely never come to full liability for their actions; and, the principle remains as codified in the 1611 King James Version: 1Co 14:38 But if any man bee ignorant, let him be ignorant.

And, furthermore, the principal regarding who is fit to Rule is again laid bare upon the foundation that Knowledge will always Rule over ignorance; and, as such it is necessary for men and women to educate themselves should they desire to one day assume the Station of Equal Rights and Standing; and, this principal is again codified in the 1611 King James Bible at: Zec 2:7 the daughter of Babylon. ====================== Now then, a friend of mine wrote a letter to the United States agent [attorney] from his FOREIGN venue. That's right friends, you are ALL foreignors to the United States. Therefore it is NOT the People who are in insurrection for they are all dead and their Posterity are running the show for the show was made for the Posterity, it is the people - men and women who are not the Heirs of the 55. T.R. regarding your issue, you were delivered, this time I included the prefix "de" in order to make my point. You were abandoned at berth. Again, I spelled "berth' the way I intended. For the doc master "de"-livered the "parcel" at berth. The whole issue is concerned with USUFRUCT. For Yehovah owns everything. Therefore it is the right of use to property that is vested in another that is placed into Trust. Therefore the USUFRUCT to your existence was claimed at your birth and expressed in your berth. The benefit of your life is expressed in Use. That is a claim in the Usufruct of your life. But you are the only one who can decide how you will live. Have you ever seen the movie The Matrix. Your energy is being used against you. You created your own prison. Therefore "give away the stone". Commerce is Warfare. Therefore War is being waged against you in LEGAL NAME. Why can I say the foregoing? Because you have been taught to do everything in that name. Mommy and Daddy have lied to you. My name is Michael Joseph. For I am Michael Joseph and not another. My name is NOT Michael and my name is not Joseph. My name is Michael Joseph. Then what of Michael Joseph SURNAME? Whose creation is that? Could Mommy and Daddy give me SURNAME? The answer is NO. They gave me my "given name" or my "Christian name". But because Mommy and Daddy believed a lie, they were disillusioned and they taught me what they had to give. As do every mom and dad - you only know what you know. But I have come to see the matter is easily resolved in Identity. I am Michael Joseph, a Son of Yehovah in Yehoshuah, my Redeemer. That is my Title! Get it? My Title is not SURNAME. My Title is Son of Yehovah in Yehoshuah. Therefore my identity is not in a creation of man, it is in the Creator. Said another way, I do not identify with the pot, I identify with the Potter. Therefore the Creator has granted USUFRUCT to His creation. Do you not enjoy the air you breath? But said air will NEVER be yours! It may be converted to different form but the components are NOT yours. Extrapolate that idea to State in regard to NAME. Deliuer thy selfe, O Zion, that dwellest with

You have fished in Admiralty all of your life in a boat [Legal Name] that does not belong to you. So then did the C.E.O. of the Foreign United States issue any health care decree upon you? What utter Nonsense. He issued a decree upon his creation that he oversees. And that, T.R. is the PERSONA - True Name SURNAME. Only you can decide if that decree is binding upon you. In reality it is not, but it can be if you choose to Consent by taking benefit from True Name SURNAME. That is called Transfer of Government. Eve did it. Adam did it. And mankind is doing the same thing every day - day in and day out. We listen to another lawgiver. And we disobey The Lawgiver. But there is hope - those Seas dry up in the Age to come. But you can also walk on water today - as Peter did - with Focus on Yehoshuah = Yehovah Saves = The Word of Yehovah. Is it written on your heart and mind? If so then it is Within you. Therefore fan the fire! - the burning bush. For our God is a consuming fire - Heb 12:29. Shalom, Michael Joseph

>>> continuing >>>

sharing the wealth...

flipping the script: is not the dollar bill evidence of a service given? Is not said service a benefit upon mankind? All of mankind? Therefore Admiralty Law governs. The Law of the Seas - the playground for Leviathan. Therefore said dollar bill is evidence of a benefit received. Building on that foundation: Have you ever noticed the field titled "Your Occupation" in the 1040 form? Occupation is a nebulous term so we decided to put the following word grouping in that field "Minister to others in need". Because that friends is our purpose. We do not perform service for our own gain - that is of the World who has all the toys wins, remember? Nonsense. The rich man was sadly disappointed when he asked Yehoshuah what more he needed to do to enter the Kingdom - go sell all and distribute to the needy, then come follow me. Well we received 100 percent refund. For the battle is not ours. Yehovah saying "Go in and BEGIN to Possess the Land for I have set it before thee." Meaning we are willing in Faith to follow the Shepherd's Voice. Why do we think our experience is anything different than Abraham? It is not. Regarding the Pyramid - the Monument or Sign - placed in Egypt, upon finding that the casing stones number 144,000, it dawned on me that the Pyramid is a symbol for ALL of mankind. And the King's Chamber is Within and Without as their are shafts that allow the Pyramid to "breath" with air. I was amazed to find the square circled in TWO systems Pi and Phi. Interesting Two. Our bodies show the same symmetry. But then also the Great Architect cubed the sphere showing that calculus could be derived by planer math. For with a simple rectangle is the double integral solved = surface area of a surface.

Religion holds no sway upon me, neither does politics, education or finance. These are all illusions which are constructed to build a house in bondage. Heb 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; Heb 2:15 And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. But back to the Legal Nature of the Word - we have Choice - to appoint a captain to lead us back into Egypt - new Babylon - perhaps you would like another name for Egypt - how about United States. Does that sting? If it did, then it was meant for you. For my Redeemer TAUGHT me to refrain from argument with my adversary. "Yehovah rebuke thee" was what Michael taught. For Lo I come in the Volume of the Book. I have learned that Revelation even though it is at the end is supplemental knowledge for the wise know to read Genesis. For the end is known from the beginning. Five months is the tribulation - NOT seven years. For the waters raged upon the Earth for 150 days - covered the KNOWN earth but in the time to come LIES will cover the known earth as a flood. Is anyone awake? How long will one cling to their English translations? The green grass is in the Hebrew. Do you see the Aleph-Tav in Gen 1:1? Have you ever heard of the Aleph-Tav [Eth]. It is hidden to the English reader for the Scripture says STUDY - reading ain't gonna cut the mustard. Study - and since Preacher is dumb as a stump - espousing the doctrines of the so called "church fathers" - the blind lead the blind. That is the house of beth-avin. How will man STAY on the Word when he leans on a shaky reed - call it whatever you want - China, United States, Egypt, whatever.... For man shall not live by bread alone but by the BREAD OF LIFE = The Word of Yehovah = Yehoshuah written on our MIND and therefore:
Proverbs 11:1 A false balance is abomination to YHVH ; but a just weight is his delight. Proverbs 20:23 Divers weights are an abomination unto YHVH ; and a false balance is not good. Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers weights, a great and a small. Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures, a great and a small.

Deuteronomy 25:13 Deuteronomy 25:14

Deuteronomy 25:15 But thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, a perfect and just measure shalt thou have: that thy days may be lengthened in the land which YHVH thy Elohiym giveth thee. Deuteronomy 25:16 thy Elohiym. For all that do such things, and all that do unrighteously, are an abomination unto YHVH

Therein lies judgment executed. I am a witness. Remember Baalam. The curse is VOLUNTARILY applied. Therefore I am only to speak the Word of Yehovah for that word is Legal and the same Word that gives Life also brings Death for those who Choose to Voluntarily submit to Death in Cursings. This is the man in the basket. Either he charms the snake or gets bitten - but a Choice will be made.

I choose Life. I now for the first time comprehend "for many are called but FEW ARE CHOSEN." For the race is long and those who get tired, cramped and give up will not be Chosen. Therefore we will finish the race so that we may be Chosen in Election for the time to come - to sit in the King's Court - a Pillar in the House of I AM. I must overcome ME. And in doing so become a benefit to ME and my Neighbors. I yoke myself to those who choose to plow in the same field - otherwise one might be wearing the wrong garment at the wedding feast. So then what is Money to one who hung the Planets? The struggle is with invisible matters - parasites - dwelling in the subconscious mind - but I am granted power to overcome - Luke 10:19. The spirits are subject to the Creator. Just like the things created by man are then subject to the men who created said things. Give unto Ceasar what belongs to Ceasar. Don't you know that Money belongs to Ceasar? What made you think it belonged to you? I know the answer - an illusion - Because they would believe a lie.... The Word always has two witnesses - do a search on "Because they would believe a lie" - Who issued strong delusions? For a man who will lose his life will gain his life. I die to myself and in so doing I gain PURPOSE. There is NOTHING in this World that can replace Purpose. Once gained it is a pearl of great price. For the Servant is the Greatest in the Estates of the World to come. Therefore in return to Occupation - "Minister to the needs of others." That friends puts me in Church. A member of a Great Body - Pyramid - Called to Purpose - with the HOPE of being Chosen to Purpose in the Age to come. For the Creator, Settlor and Grantor is the ONLY one who can Elect/Choose one of His creation to Destiny. Therefore we are absent ability to issue judgment - but we stand as witnesses to the Glory of Yehovah in Yehoshuah, our Redeemer, our Savior and in whom lies the only Trust that matters. Judgement comes from the Word - the Rock of offense to those who preach the Law is no more. If you think otherwise, then enjoy your chains - because those who follow "leaders who watch the parking meters" are going to find out soon enough that the fence is a very insecure place - toto is about to pull back the veil and kansas is about to go bye bye. For the thesis and anti-thesis has already been made ready and effected - what remains is the clash - and the double headed eagle is looking to the synthesis which has long time been made ready and waiting for that great day of revealing. The hour [five months] approaches and we stand as watchmen upon the tower. Do you have a destiny? If you think me crazy then you don't understand that the Estate in FAMILY NAME is not yours. And it NEVER will be yours. It belongs to another - due to your actions and no other. I created my own prisonI created my own prison by placing my Trust wholeheartedly in a system that I neither comprehend or understand. Have you really stopped to consider for a moment that the public fools have you pledging to a piece of cloth. I mean really how dumb do you think I am that you would have me pledge to a piece of cloth. My ENSIGN is The Word of Yehovah is Yehoshuah. A study in USUFRUCT for the intrepid amongst you will reveal your error in thinking. You are End User and until you get that thru your head or INTO your brain you will continue to get the crap kicked out of you by the State because you are fighting those who are SWORN to protect the PUBLIC TRUST. Therefore go sell all that you have - give away the stone - that fated anchor - and let the

waters [mem] come and wash you in instruction [Lamed] so that you may be fenced in and surrounded by the Fence [Chet] - for you are called to be a king [MeLeCH] - but you must first overcome ignorance : Hosea 4:6. And transmutate those leaden grudges into gold. The Estate is not yours - so what are you clinging too? In capacity as private beneficiary under Yehoshuah the risen Messiah, my Redeemer and my Savior and in whom I trust, and absent status as a customer, and absent any liability assumed in or for any U.S. Person(s), artificial or otherwise, included but not limited to, [the] UNITED NATIONS, and/or [the] UNITED STATES and/or [the] STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, and/or [the] COUNTY OF WAKE and/or [the] FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM and their persons (artificial or otherwise), absent any express or implied warranties; and, without recourse, and absent surety(ship) and absent accommodation or affiliation in or for [the] INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and [the] FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM; and, absent claim for or to any benefit received via this writing, and without prejudice, and I claim assurance in Yehoshuah, the Word of Yehovah the original organic depository trust number incun.1454.b5 and I claim assurance under said original organic trust agreement in the name of Yehoshuah, in and unto [the[ MICHAEL JOSEPH SURNAME, paid in advance by the United States Treasury, and I claim the precious blood of Yehoshuah, my Redeemerin the name of Yehoshuah ben Yehovah, I am michael joseph a redeemed Son of Yehovah in Yehoshuah of the Tribes of Yisrael (Jacob) and I now set my hand to this expression by my free will act with full liability concerning my dominions under my Redeemer, Yehoshuah and absent intent to trespass, but to live in peace with my neighbors; Shalom: Michael Joseph P.S. For the intrepid, if I do not hold the Legal or Equitable titles and I am not beneficiary, can't I still benefit for the creation? Of course I can. So why would I claim that I own anything, when in fact I don't even own my very existence? Ezekiel 18:4. Therefore there is only to Serve, in Works and; to Love in Faith. For the race is Long and we want to Finish it. Else there is no inheritance for one who gives up in the last hour. I own my expression of my mind = CHOICE. Rom_12:20 Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. The place of decision has been reached - shall we heap fire of destruction or fire of instruction? For our adversary is unseen. And the wise man prays for the man who stands as his adversary. For the wise man knows to heap the fire of goodness upon the head of his adversary. For our God is a consuming fire. Therefore we do not bring our enemy low but we extend a hand in SERVICE to Lift up one in bondage - to elevate his mind - resurrect - to a higher estate. For Mosheh would not be pulled down into the mire of those who imagined good intention. Show me the Warrant in the Scriptures for that Pagan Idolatrous Heathen Christmas, and perhaps I will allow myself to be a part of it; until then, Yehovah rebuke it. For while man came to know the knowledge of Evil - all stop - Man was made to know Good and Live. But in the knowledge of Evil [Live backwards] man has Choice - so then why did Yehovah look down and only see evil such that it Repented Him that He had made man in the flesh? I was before, I am now, and I will be in Yehoshuah - yesterday today and tomorrow - first Age [heaven and earth], second Age [flesh age] and the third age to come.

Oh heck I am all over the place tonight so I am going to keep on plowing. Why do people assume that Heaven will be perfection absent any dispute? I will tell you why. Because they have not read their Scripture. Those Chosen will sit as elohim's [judges] in court to judge the disputes. Why do men look up and say they are leaving this Earth? That too is not in Scripture. For Scripture tells us that Emmanuel - God with Us - in Zion. So then the race being long - I desire to be worthy in my righteousness, my works, to be chosen by God to stand in His Court. For many are called, but Few are Chosen. Isa_10:19 And the rest of the trees of his forest shall be few, that a child may write them. Howl watchmen - blow the trumpet and wake up those who will listen. Isa_13:6 Howl ye; for the day of the LORD is at hand; it shall come as a destruction from the Almighty. I AM THAT I AM appeared to Abraham as the Almighty. And looking for just one righteous man - the Almighty rained fire onto an unrighteous lawless people - for they all proclaim - the law is done away with. Let me tell you something friend : The Law will NEVER be done away. But men stay on lies - because they stand without the great circle trusting other men for their meat - and as such - they devour each other. Come with me Spiritually as these consume their own children in their own lust for self indulgence - let them pay for it. Lev 26:29 And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat. ---------Returning to USUFRUCT: Zec 5:1 Then I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a flying roll. Zec 5:2 And he said unto me, What seest thou? And I answered, I see a flying roll; the length thereof is twenty cubits, and the breadth there of ten cubits. Zec 5:3 Then said he unto me, This is the curse that goeth forth over the face of the whole earth: for every one that stealeth shall be cut off as on this side according to it; and every one that sweareth shall be cut off as on that side according to it. On one side of the Roll are the MIN-O-SAURS; remember the rich man? My house, my job, my intellect, my, I, mine. And on the other side are those who take an Oath to protect the Public Trust. These two are in constant conflict - because they are both Ignorant to the truth. But you say I don't steal - I am righteous. That is my house - I paid for it. It's mine. Well then in fact if that is what you believe then you are indeed ignorant and you are in INSURRECTION and therefore the same State that you bow your knee to - holds you as an Enemy - according to an act made in 1917 Trading with the Enemy. Surely you are aware of the Rules of State because it has become God - obey the State it is where Security is found. Not really - I jest. But I find this little gem which tells me it is all an illusion:

But the States, by the exercise of the taxing power, can take from their inhabitants every cent the inhabitants can spare, and live. Dear Reader surely you know what the Term TAKE means, right? How about Inhabitants? Surely you are much more than a mere Inhabitant, right? It just can't be. Surely you know what the Term SEIZE means, right? To TAKE by Force. This TAKING is Warranted because on the other side of the Roll is a Thief - a MIN-O-SAUR. Who is trying his best to TAKE Property being held by those who have an Oath up uphold the Public Trust. The BLIND LEAD THE BLIND. For one will say but we Elect our Leaders and surely they know. Blind lead the Blind - foolish children - being led by a small people - said people received a mark and were kicked from the Garden. You can find them at 1st Chron 2:55. Look up next time you are downtown they are still keeping the books; yet they subject to the Great King. For Jacob, I loved and Esau, I hated. Will you contend for your birthright? "Did they get you to trade Your heroes for ghosts Hot Ashes for Trees Hot air for a Cool Breeze Cold Comfort for Change Did you Exchange A Walk-On part in the War For a Lead Role in a Cage?""Did they get you to trade Your heroes for ghosts Hot Ashes for Trees Hot air for a Cool Breeze Cold Comfort for Change Did you Exchange A Walk-On part in the War For a Lead Role in a Cage?" The foregoing quote is Amazing. A "walk-on" is one who is NOT recruited. One so hopelessly blind that he engages himself in another's struggle. [Constitutor] A walk on joins the team by CONSENT. One who exchanged Rights for Privileges. Dig deep in your pocket tell me if you can find a Driver's License. A license is a Privilege to Drive. A Privilege...... The CEO for the Fascist Corporation called United States told everyone CHANGE was coming - Cold Comfort for Change - an illusion of Security - back to the womb of security - a modern day TOWER OF BABEL. [A little Red Worm eating the Gourd that gave Jonah shade - Corporate Socialism Devoid of God and driven to consume all flesh. Come let us eat your son today and tomorrow we can eat mine. And to the False Prophet in Church and in State: "Swimming in a Fish Bowl Year after Year

Running over the Same old Ground What have we found The Same old Fears" But my Scripture tells me to FEAR NOT - in fact it says FEAR NOT 365 times. When will the Children be weaned from mother's tit? It is time to eat at strong meat - for that 12 year old girl is drunk with milk. I set the plow in three feet - for those who are fit to glean in my field I hope that you could glean from the foregoing. Son 4:7 Thou art all fair, my love; there is no spot in thee. Solomon [anti-messiah, in type] will not allure her - she will not consent to anyone other than her Shepherd Boy.