PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 22 December 2006 CONTENTS A. B. C. D. E. General description of the small scale project activity Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology Duration of the project activity / crediting period Environmental impacts Stakeholders comments Annexes Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the proposed small scale project activity Annex 2: Information regarding public funding Annex 3: Baseline information Annex 4: Monitoring Information

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

Revision history of this document

Version Number 01 02

Date 21 January 2003 8 July 2005

Description and reason of revision Initial adoption The Board agreed to revise the CDM SSC PDD to reflect guidance and clarifications provided by the Board since version 01 of this document. As a consequence, the guidelines for completing CDM SSC PDD have been revised accordingly to version 2. The latest version can be found at <http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents>. The Board agreed to revise the CDM project design document for small-scale activities (CDM-SSC-PDD), taking into account CDM-PDD and CDM-NM.

03

22 December 2006

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

SECTION A. General description of small-scale project activity A.1 Title of the small-scale project activity: >> 8.5 MW wind power project in Chitradurga district in Karnataka by Jindal Aluminium Ltd. Version1.1 25th March 2007

A.2.

Description of the small-scale project activity:

>> The project activity involves the implementation of a total of 8.5 MW capacity wind turbines at Chitradurga District, Karnataka. This project is promoted by M/s Jindal Aluminium Limited (JAL), based in Bangalore, Karnataka. JAL is the largest producer of Aluminium Extrusion components in India, and has been in operation for over 35 years. JAL was promoted by Dr.S.R.Jindal who has over 50 years experience in the industry including 36 years in aluminium extrusion industry and 10 years in wind energy sector. JAL has been one of the pioneers in utilizing renewable energy resources for its operations. With acute power shortages in Karnataka, JAL stepped in to ease the situation with alternate non-conventional renewable energy source- wind energy. JAL established its first wind power project in 1997 and meets a majority of its requirements through the wind power it generates. It is exporting the entire electricity generated from its newer wind power projects (established after 2002) to the grid. The objective for the project under consideration is generation of electricity from renewable wind energy, resulting in addition of capacity to the grid and displacing an equivalent amount of fossil fuel based electricity generation. The electricity generated from this project activity is supplied to common local substation through local transmission lines duly metered at developers end. The project activity comprises of supply, erection, commissioning and operation of 11 numbers of Enercon 600 kW rated Wind Turbine Generators (WTG) and 2 numbers of 950 KW WTG from NEG Micon. The project is guaranteed to generate a maximum annual output of 22.1 GWh of electricity. The project contributes to sustainability in many ways 1. The reduction of emission due to the prevention of the use of fossil fuel for the generation of power 2. Direct and indirect employment to the local population due to the project implementation. JAL employs two people full time (on their payroll) and provides employment to five other people (as part of the O&M team) for the regular maintenance and site security of the project.

A.3.

Project participants:

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

>> Name of Party Involved (*) ((host) indicates a host party) Private and/or public entity(ies) project participants (*) (as applicable) Jindal Aluminium Ltd. Kindly indicate if the Party involved wishes to be considered as project participant (Yes/No) No.

Govt of India

A.4.

Technical description of the small-scale project activity: A.4.1. Location of the small-scale project activity:

>> The project is distributed across two locations in the district of Chitradurga. The district of Chitradurga has favorable wind conditions, and is a preferred location for Wind Generation in Karnataka. A.4.1.1. >> India A.4.1.2. >> State : Karnataka A.4.1.3. >> District: Chitradurga Region/State/Province etc.: Host Party(ies):

City/Town/Community etc:

A.4.1.4. Details of physical location, including information allowing the unique identification of this small-scale project activity : >>

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

Andhra Pradesh Karnataka

Tamil Nadu

The first site is near Nandana Hosura, H.D. Pura & Thalya Village, Holalkere Taluk, District of Chitradurga. This site consists of 11 WTG of 600KW each, manufactured by Enercon limited. The second site is located at G.R. Halli and Kunchiganal Villages, Chitraduga Taluk, Chitradurga District. This site consists of 2 WTG of 950 KW each, manufactured by NEG Micon.

NH4

Site 2

Site 1

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

A.4.2. Type and category(ies) and technology/measure of the small-scale project activity: >> The project generates a total of 8.5 MW, within the qualification criteria of 15 MW for small scale projects. Being a renewable energy project, there is no project emissions, hence it qualifies under the criterion for small scale projects. The project generates electricity through the use of renewable energy, which places it under Type I according to the Appendix B of the small scale CDM project activities. As the project is exporting the entire electricity generated to the grid, it falls under the category ID. The applicable methodology is AMS ID, Renewable electricity generation for a grid. Project Site 1. The Project Activity at the first site consists of 11 numbers of Enercon made 600 kW rated WTG with internal electrical lines connecting the projects with local evacuation facility. The WTGs generates 3-phase power at 440 V, which is stepped up to 33 KV. The turbines operate as base load units and can operate in the frequency range of 47.551.5 Hz and in the voltage range of 400 V 12.5%. PPAs for 10 years term extendible by another 10 years with mutual consent with Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited have been agreed upon. The other salient features of the WTGs are: Gearless Construction - Rotor & Generator Mounted on same shaft eliminating the Gearbox. Variable Speed function ensuring optimum efficiency at all times, having speed range of 18 to 33 RPM. Variable Pitch functions ensuring maximum energy capture. Minimum drawl (less than 1% of kWh generated) of Reactive Power from the grid. No voltage peaks at any time. Three Independent Braking System. Incorporates lightning protection system, which includes blades. Project Site 2 The second project site has 2 numbers of NEG Micon made 950 KW rated WTG. The WTGs have a rotor diameter of 54 meter installed on 55 meter high steel tubular towers. They operate as base load units. PPAs for 10 years term extendible by another 10 years with mutual consent with Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited have been agreed upon. A diagram of the WTG is attached below.

It consists of an asynchronous generator operating at a nominal voltage of 690 V and 50 Hz.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

A.4.3

Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:

>> The estimated emission reduction over the 10 year period is 151840 credits A.4.4. Public funding of the small-scale project activity: >> There is no ODA funding being used for the project. The entire project has been funded through a combination of debt and equity by the project promoters. A.4.5. Confirmation that the small-scale project activity is not a debundled component of a large scale project activity: A small scale project is considered a de-bundled component of a large scale project activity if it meets the criteria laid down in Paragraph 2 of the Simplified Modalities and Procedures for Small Scale CDM project activities. A project is considered de-bundled, if there is a registered small scale activity or an application to register another small-scale activity: With the same project participants In the same project category an technology/measure; and Registered within the previous 2 years; and Whose project boundary is within 1 km of the project boundary of the proposed small scale activity at the closest point.

No other small scale activity meets all the above mentioned criteria. The proposed project activity is, therefore, not a de-bundled component of a larger project activity

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

SECTION B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology

B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the small-scale project activity: >> Approved Small Scale Methodology Type I Renewable Energy Projects Category I D Title: Grid Connected Renewable Energy Generation Reference: AMS I D Scope I Version 10 (23 December 2006) B.2 Justification of the choice of the project category: >> The project consists of exporting electricity to the Southern grid generated through wind power. As the project emissions are zero, the emissions reductions is equivalent to the emissions avoided in the baseline scenario. The baseline is based on the electricity exported to the grid and generation mix for the grid. The avoided emissions can be measured directly by the quantum of electricity generated and evacuated to the grid by the project activity. This is monitored by electricity meters at the generation site and at the point of connection to the grid. The project activity meets the eligibility criteria to use simplified modalities and procedure for smallscale CDM project activities as set out in paragraph 6 (c) of decision 17/CP.7. The total installed capacity of the project is 8.5 MW, which is less than the limit of 15 MW prescribed for small scale project. Moreover, being a renewable energy project, the project emissions are zero.

B.3. Description of the project boundary: >> The project boundary as per AMS ID encompasses the physical, geographical site of the renewable generation source. For the project under consideration, the project boundary will be the 6.6 MW and 1.9 MW project site, the associated grid connection till the KPTCL substation. B.4. Description of baseline and its development:

>> This category comprises renewable energy generation units, such as photovoltaics, hydro, tidal/wave, wind, geothermal, and renewable biomass, that supply electricity to and/or displace electricity from an electricity distribution system that is or would have been supplied by at least one fossil fuel fired generating unit. .
To arrive at the baseline, according to Para 9 b of the methodology I.D, the kWh produced by the renewable generating unit is multiplied by an emission coefficient (measured in kgCO2/kWh) calculated in a transparent and conservative manner.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

The emission coefficient can be arrived at by two methods, as follows. (a) The average of the Approximate Operating Margin and the Build Margin, where: The Approximate Operating Margin is the weighted average emissions (in tCO2eq./kWh) of all generating sources serving the system, excluding hydro, geothermal, wind, low-cost biomass, nuclear and solar generation. The Build Margin is the weighted average emissions (in tCO2eq./kWh) of recent capacity additions to the system, which capacity additions are defined as the greater (in MW) of most recent 20% of existing plants or the 5 most recent plants OR (b) The weighted average emissions (in tCO2eq./kWh) of the current generation mix. The methodology suggests a conservative approach by selecting the lower of the above two options. The grid under consideration is the entire Southern Grid, consisting of the states of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Kerala. The regional grid electricity system is a mix of predominantly coal fired thermal, hydro, wind, natural gas and nuclear. The contribution of solar and biomass based grid supply is negligible. Keeping in view of the electricity scenario, the entire Southern region electricity grid system with its expansion plans, generation and investment trends is considered for identifying the baseline. For this purpose of baseline calculation, data published by the Central Electricty Authority and the power ministry has been used. Since, collecting heat rates for all baseline power generating stations is difficult, only net heat rates as specified by the CEA are considered. This is conservative and reasonable for a small-scale project activity whose generation is negligibly small compared to the total generation of the grid system The details of the baseline calculation are provided in Appendix 3

B.5. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered small-scale CDM project activity: According to the Attachment A to Appendix B, project participants are to provide an explanation to show that the project activity would not have occurred anyway due to at least one of the following barriers: (a) Investment barrier: (b) Technological barrier: (c) Barrier due to prevailing practice: (d) Other barriers: without the project activity, for another specific reason identified by the project participant, such as institutional barriers or limited information, managerial resources, organizational capacity, financial resources, or capacity to absorb new technologies, emissions would have been higher. Background Jindal Aluminium Ltd. is controlled by a traditional Indian business family, which has been running the Aluminium extrusion business for more than 30 years and has not diversified into any major activities.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

Most of their activities revolve around charity and social benefits. The factory premises provide housing facilities for the workers, schools and hospitals for employees and local residents. The interest in renewable energy is primarily driven by the chairman of the company Dr. S. R. Jindal. The first captive wind power facility was established in 1997, with a capacity of 4.14 MW. This was one of the first commercial wind power project set up in Karnataka, and JAL took substantial risk in setting up this project. This project (not part of the projects under consideration in this document as it was established prior to the year 2000), provides captive power to the plant operations and meets 65% of its current requirement. At the time of installation of the captive wind project, its capacity was sufficient to meet the entire requirements of the plant. Investment Barriers Return on investment JAL put in the required investment based on a PLF of 28% for the duration of the project. A PLF of 28% entailed a IRR on equity of 24%. However, the operation in the past two years has shown an average PLF of only 23%, a drop of around 18%. This variation is substantially more than what can be accounted for in the normal project risk. Investment Options to JAL With wheeling and banking charges making captive wind power projects financially unviable, no further expansion happened until the year 2002. In the year 2002, multiple projects were under consideration for investment. Amongst the projects considered were core to the activities of JAL. They included 1. Ductile Iron pipe manufacturing plant 2. Integrated steel plant Both these projects are core to the skill sets of the company and offered a lower risk investment proposition to the company. The existing consumer base built over 35 years of operation and the booming Indian economy was a strong case for investments in these projects. However, the focus of the chairman of JAL towards renewable energy tilted the decision to go in for further investments in wind energy. The evidence for the push towards renewable energy is provided by the following: 1. The PPA provides highly unfavorable sharing of carbon revenues between JAL and KPTCL. Inspite of the unfavorable potential of carbon revenues, JAL decided to go ahead with the projects. 2. The company has availed the benefits of depreciation on windmill projects spread over a period of 4 years for income tax purposes. The company is also eligible to claim deduction u/s 80IA of Income Tax Act to the extent of 100% of its windmill profits in 10 assessment years out of the first 15 assessment years commencing from the date of commercial operation. However, the deduction u/s 80IA of the Income Tax Act has not been claimed till date in view of inadequacy of profits (after considering unabsorbed depreciation) from the wind mill projects. Other Barrier Trend in decreasing support to renewable energy

10

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

JAL has been a pioneer in promoting wind power projects, and has even taken legal recourse against the increasingly unfavorable climate to renewable energy projects. For example, the applicable wheeling charges were increased from 2% at the time the first project was set up in 1997 to 20% by 2001. The tariff structure offered by KPTCL over the years shows an unfavorable trend towards renewable energy projects. For example, for PPAs filed on or after 10 June 2004 (Source: KERC Order dated 18 January 2005), the tariff for wind energy projects is set at Rs. 3.40 per kWh without any escalation for the 10-year period from the date of commercial operation of the plant. As compared to this, projects prior to this period were entitled to a 5% escalation on a base of 3.25 per KWh. Effect of weather conditions on the generation from renewables Renewable energy in the Southern part of India, specially Hydro and Wind is heavily dependent on the monsoon situation. There are no perennial rivers for hydro power projects and the wind density is highest only during the monsoons. The lack of proper monsoon rainfall affects both the Hydro and wind power projects severely. Continuous droughts over three years led to a drop in output from renewable energy projects in the entire Southern region, including Karnataka. This affects the Wind projects as they are smaller in size and the reduced generation affects the projected income

Karnataka State
16 14 GWh ('000) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2001 2002 2003 Year 2004 2005 Fossil fuel Renewable

B.6.

Emission reductions:

B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices: >> The project activity meets the eligibility criteria to use simplified modalities and procedure for smallscale CDM project activities as set out in paragraph 6 (c) of decision 17/CP.7. The total installed capacity of the project is 8.5 MW, which is less than the limit of 15 MW prescribed for small scale project. Moreover, being a renewable energy project, the project emissions are zero. B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation: (Copy this table for each data and parameter)

11

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter:

BEy tCO2e Baseline Emissions Not Applicable Calculated

EFy

Data unit: tCO2/MWh Description: Emission Factor for the grid under consideration Source of data used: Calculated from Publicly available data Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: EF_OMy tCO2/MWh Operating Margin Calculated Not Applicable

Generation-weighted average emissions per electricity unit of all generating sources serving the system, including zero- or low-operating cost power plants EF_ BMy tCO2/MWh Build Margin Calculated Not Applicable

12

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Generation-weighted average emission factor of the selected representative set of recent power plants represented by the 5 most recent plants or the most 20% of the generating units built Data / Parameter: Fi,y

Data unit: Kg (for solid fuel) l (for liquid fuel) Description: Fuel consumption for the generation plant in consideration Source of data used: Publicly Available data Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: COEFi

Data unit: Number Description: The associated carbon coefficient of the fossil fuel i consumed in the grid. Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods NCVi,j Kcal/kg OR kcal/l Net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel i

13

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: OXIDi

Data unit: Number between 0 and 1 Description: Oxidation factor of the fuel Source of data used: default values based on 1996 Revised IPCC Guidelines Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment: Data / Parameter: EFCO2,i

Data unit: gCO2/MJ Description: CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i. Source of data used: Value applied: Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied : Any comment:

B.6.3 >> S. No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions:

Year 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

EGy (GWh) EFCO2,Elec,y 17.8 0.853 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 0.853 0.853 0.853 0.853 0.853 0.853

PEy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BEy 15184 15184 15184 15184 15184 15184 15184

14

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

8 9 10

2013-14 2015-16 2017-18

17.8 17.8 17.8

0.853 0.853 0.853

0 0 0

15184 15184 15184

15

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

B.6.4 >> Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10

Summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions: Annual Estimation of emission reduction in tonnes of CO2e 15184 15184 15184 15184 15184 15184 15184 15184 15184 15184 151840 10 15184

Total Estimated reduction over the crediting period Crediting period Annual average over the crediting period B.7

Application of a monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:

B.7.1 Data and parameters monitored: (Copy this table for each data and parameter) Data / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data to be used: Value of data Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied: QA/QC procedures to be applied: Any comment: B.7.2 >>
EGy KWh Power Generated

Electronic Measurement at site Measured

Will be the actual power evacuated as measured at KPTCL substation

Refer to description of monitoring plan below for QA/QC

Description of the monitoring plan:

16

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

Monitoring methodology is as per approved small scale methodology AMS- ID Version 10 (23 December 2006). Paragraph 13 of the approved methodology mentions Monitoring shall consist of metering the electricity generated by the renewable technology. In the case of co-fired plants, the amount of biomass and fossil fuel input shall be monitored The project consists of exporting electricity to the Southern grid generated through wind power. As the project emissions are zero, the emissions reductions is equivalent to the emissions avoided in the baseline scenario. The baseline is based on the electricity exported to the grid and generation mix for the grid. The avoided emissions can be measured directly by the quantum of electricity generated and evacuated to the grid by the project activity. This is monitored by electricity meters at the generation site and at the point of connection to the grid. The project activity meets the eligibility criteria to use simplified modalities and procedure for smallscale CDM project activities as set out in paragraph 6 (c) of decision 17/CP.7. The total installed capacity of the project is 8.5 MW, which is less than the limit of 15 MW prescribed for small scale project. Moreover, being a renewable energy project, the project emissions are zero. QA/QC Procedure The meter readings happen at two levels. 1. The actual generation for each WTG is recorded by the JAL employees at site. This is done by a manual recording of the daily output. The historical generation data is also recorded by electronic meters at each WTG. 2. The generation data is also recorded by the O&M teams of the manufacturers at the project site. 3. The data is sent to the Bangalore project office of JAL for consolidation and checks. 4. Invoice based on the meter readings is generated and sent to KPTCL. 5. The amount evacuated to the substation is recorded by KPTCL meters. The difference in readings is due to T&D losses. Multiple records and checks are kept in the form of actual amount generated, quantum evacuated at the substation and the net T&D losses B.8 Date of completion of the application of the baseline and monitoring methodology and the name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies) >> Baseline and monitoring methodology prepared on 15/11/06 Baseline and monitoring Methodology was prepared by Mr. Monish Das of Amoda Environmental Solutions Pvt Ltd., Bangalore SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period C.1 Duration of the project activity:

C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity: >> The project was fully operational by May 2003.

17

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity:

>> The lifetime of the project is 20 years C.2 Choice of the crediting period and related information: C.2.1. Renewable crediting period C.2.1.1. >> Not Applicable C.2.1.2. Length of the first crediting period: >> Not Applicable C.2.2. Fixed crediting period: C.2.2.1. Starting date: >> 15/06/07 or date of registration of the project whichever is later C.2.2.2. >> 10 years SECTION D. Environmental impacts >> D.1. If required by the host Party, documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity: >> EIA is not required for the project as it does not fall either under Category A or Category B of the MoEF Notification on Environmental Impact Assessment. Hence no EIA was conducted for the project. D.2. If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party: >> Not applicable SECTION E. Stakeholders comments >> E.1. Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled: >> The project was implemented on forest land leased out by the government of India for the explicit purpose of the setting up of renewable energy projects. Length: Starting date of the first crediting period:

18

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

Under the govt of India rules for renewable energy projects 1. EIA is not required for the project as it does not fall either under Category A or Category B of the MoEF Notification on Environmental Impact Assessment. Hence no EIA was conducted for the project. 2. As the land used for the project comes under the jurisdiction of the Forest department, Government of Karnataka, the NOC/ Clearance from Zilla Panchayat / Gram Panchayat does not arise. 3. The land is leased in the name of KREDL (Karnataka Renewable Energy Development Limited) which in turn has sub leased it to Enercon for the implementation of the project. 4. Clearance was obtained both from Ministry of Environment and Forest (Govt. of India) and Forest Ecology and Environment Department (State govt. of Karnataka) for the land used for setting up of the wind mill. All relevant documents are provided to the validating authority. The various stakeholders during the project implementation were. Stakeholder Name KREDL (Karnataka Renewable Energy Development Limited) http://www.kredl.kar.nic.in/ Function Organization devoted entirely to the promotion of non-conventional energy sources in Karnataka. The company advises the Government of Karnataka on policies to be adopted for ensuring a systematic and balanced growth of projects for harnessing renewable energy sources. The ministry of environment and forest of the Govt of India is responsible for environmental well being and overseeing all activities on forest land. State level body for overseeing all environment and ecology functions

MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forest, Govt. of India) http://Moef.nic.in Forest Ecology and Environment, Govt. of Karnataka state http://parisara.kar.nic.in/

E.2. Summary of the comments received: >> The use of the forest land was granted under the conditions that 1. The legal status of the forest land shall not be changed 2. No trees should be felled for the project activity 3. The wind farm should be designed in such a manner as to avoid future damage due to high velocity winds. 4. The forest land should not be used for any purpose other than that specified

E.3. >>

Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:

19

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

There were no adverse comments on the projects hence no action was required.

20

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

Annex 1 CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY Organization: Street/P.O.Box: Building: City: State/Region: Postfix/ZIP: Country: Telephone: FAX: E-Mail: URL: Represented by: Title: Salutation: Last Name: Middle Name: First Name: Department: Mobile: Direct FAX: Direct tel: Personal E-Mail: Jindal Aluminium Limited Jindal Nagar Tumkur Road Bangalore Karnataka 560073 India +91 80 23715555 +91 80 23713333 www.jindalaluminium.com GM (Corporate Affairs) Mr. Mayurnath Ravindranath

mravindranath@jindalaluminium.com

21

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

Annex 2 INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING No public funding was availed for this project.

22

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board Annex 3 BASELINE INFORMATION As per AMS I.D, the baseline emissions are calculated as the net electricity generated by the project activity, multiplied with the baseline emission factor for the project grid derived in Section B.2: BEy = EGy x EFy where: BEy Baseline emissions in year y (t CO2) EGy Net electricity generated by the project activity (GWh) EFy Baseline emission factor for the project grid (t CO2/GWh) The emission factor EFy of the grid is represented as a combination of the Operating Margin and the Build Margin. If we set the emission factor of associated method as EF_OMy and EF_BMy, the EFy is given by: EFy = wOM * EF_OMy + wBM * EF_BMy..(1) with respective weight factors wOM and wBM (where wOM + wBM = 1), and by default, are weighted equally (wOM = wBM = 0.5). The Operating Margin emission factor EF_OMy is defined as the generation-weighted average emissions per electricity unit of all generating sources serving the system, including zero- or lowoperating cost power plants (hydro, geothermal, wind, low-cost biomass, nuclear and solar generation), based on the latest year statistics data and are derived from the following equation: EF_OMy = [i Fi,y*COEFi] / [j GENj,y] ..(2) where

23

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board Fi,y is the fuel consumption COEFi is the associated carbon coefficient of the fossil fuel i consumed in the grid. GENj,y is the electricity generation at the plant j connected to the grid excluding zero- or low-operating cost sources. The CO2 emission coefficient COEFi,j is obtained as: COEFi,j = NCVi,j * EFCO2,i * OXIDi.(3) where: NCVi,j is the net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel i, OXIDi is the oxidation factor of the fuel (default values based on 1996 Revised IPCC Guidelines), EFCO2,i is the CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i. The build margin emission factor The Build Margin emission factor EF_BMy is given as the generation-weighted average emission factor of the selected representative set of recent power plants represented by the 5 most recent plants or the most 20% of the generating units built (summation is over such plants specified by k): EF_BMy = [i Fi,y*COEFi] / [k GENk,y]..(4) as the default method. The summation over i and k is for the fuels and electricity generation of the plants mentioned above

24

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board Appendix 3A: Baseline Generation Data used for calcualtion

S_no

Name

Capacity MW as on 31/03/2005

State

Type

Fuel 1

Fuel 2

2004-05 Net Generation GWH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

K_gudem K_gudem new Vijaywada R_gundem - b Rayal seema Vijeswaran gt R_gundem stps Simhadri Jegurupadu gt Godavari gt Kondapalli gt Lvs power dg Peddapuram ccgt Raichur Yelhanka (dg) Kaiga Torangallu imp Bellary dg Tanir bavi Belgaum dg Bramhapuram dg Kojikode dg

680 500 1260 62.5 420 272.3 2600 1000 235.4 208 350 36.8 220 1470 127.92 440 260 25.2 220 81.3 106.5 128

Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Kerala Kerala

Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Nuclear Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal

Coal Coal Coal Coal Coal Gas Coal Coal Gas Gas Gas Diesel Gas Coal Diesel Nuclear Coal Diesel Gas Diesel Diesel Diesel

Oil Oil Oil Oil Oil Napt Oil Oil N/a N/a Napt N/a N/a Oil N/a Oil/corex N/a Napt N/a N/a N/a

4,919 3,770 8,926 449 3,078 1,940 16,038 7,663 1,392 1,344 2,179 0 1,142 9,799 262 2,608 1,841 39 630 240 252 152

25

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Cochin ccgt Kasargode dg Kayam kulam gt Ennore Tuticorin Mettur North chennai Basin bridge gt Valuthur gt Kuttalam gt B. Bridge d.g Kovilkalappal P.nallur ccgt Samalpatti dg Samayanallur dg Karuppur gt (aban) Neyveli st i Neyveli st ii Neyveli fst ext Neyveli tps(z) M.a.p.p. Karaikal Machkund Upper sileru i&ii Lower sileru Nagarjuna sagar N_sagar rbc & extn. N_sagar lbc Donkarayi Srisailam T.b. Dam 174 21.9 350 450 1050 840 630 120 94 100 200 107 330.5 105.7 106 70 600 1470 420 250 390 32.5 114.75 240 460 815.6 90 60 25 770 36 Kerala Kerala Kerala Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Pondichery Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Thermal Nuclear Thermal Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Napt Diesel Gas Coal Coal Coal Coal Napt Gas Gas Diesel Gas Gas Diesel Diesel Gas Lign Lign Lign Lign Nuclear Gas N/a N/a N/a N/a N/a Napt N/a N/a N/a Oil Oil Oil Oil Diesel N/a Napt Oil Oil Oil Oil 108 15 602 1,041 7,539 6,128 3,560 39 526 605 763 717 462 345 369 3,773 8,344 2,945 1,246 1,300 260 895 541 1,165 501 48 5 132 935 148

26

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 Pochampad Nizam sagar Penna ahobelam Singur Srisailam lbph Sharavathy Kalinadi Kalinadi supa Liganamakki Varahi Bhadra Ghat prabha Mani dph Mallarpur Sharavathy tail race Kadra Kodasali Almatti dam Jog Sivasamundrum Shimsapura Munirabad Shivapura Shahpur Madhavamantri Narayanpur Kuttiadi & extn. Idukki Sabarigiri Idamalayar Lower periyar 27 10 20 15 900 1006.2 855 100 55 230 39.2 32 9 9 240 150 120 180 139.2 42 17.2 28.3 18 6.6 4.5 11.6 125 780 300 75 180 Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Andhra pradesh Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro 0 0 0 1 1,404 3,836 1,712 293 193 968 43 96 22 0 435 231 215 139 172 193 94 69 71 24 23 43 369 1,993 1,218 335 511

27

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board

85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 Kakkad Sholayar Sengulam Narimanglam Pallivasal Poringalkuttu Poringalkuttu l Panniar Kallada Chembukadavu-ii Urumi-i Maniyar Kuthungal Kundah i-v Parsen_s valle Mettur dam Periyar Kodayar-i&ii Sholayar i&ii Pykara Aliyar Sarkarpathy Papanasam Moyar Suruliyar Servalar Lower mettur Vaigai dam Kadampari 50 54 48 45 37.5 32 16 30 15 3.75 3.75 12 21 555 30 240 140 100 95 58.95 60 30 28 36 35 20 120 13.5 400 Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Tamil nadu Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro Hydro 210 263 165 232 222 181 169 141 75 6 3 34 36 1,559 55 333 491 204 349 217 161 115 88 90 101 33 254 86 256

28

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03

CDM Executive Board Annex 4 MONITORING INFORMATION -----

29