Training Session on Energy Equipment E i t

Lighting
Presentation from the Energy Efficiency Guide for Industry in Asia Energy Asia www.energyefficiencyasia.org

1 UNEP 2006

Training Agenda: Lighting

Introduction Types of lighting systems Assessment of lighting systems Energy efficiency opportunities gy y pp

2 UNEP 2006

Introduction Background
Li hti energy consumption Lighting ti 20-45% in commercial buildings 20 45% 3-10% in industrial plants Significant energy savings can be realized with a minimal capital investment
3 UNEP 2006

Introduction Basic Theory

Li ht electromagnetic waves in Light: l t ti i space Light is emitted through:
a) Incandescence b) Electric discharge c) Electro luminescence d) Photoluminescence
4 UNEP 2006

Introduction Definitions and Common Terms

Lumen
1 lumen = the photometric equivalent of the watt 1 lumen = luminous

flux per m2 of a sphere with 1 m radius and a 1 candela isotropic light source at the centre
1 watt = 683 lumens at 555 nm wavelength

Lux
metric unit of measure for illuminance on a surface: 1 lux = 1 lumen / m2
5

UNEP 2006

Introduction Definitions and Common Terms

Luminous intensity (I)
measured in Candela (cd)

Luminous flux (lm)

4 x luminous intensity

6 UNEP 2006

Introduction Definitions and Common Terms

Installed load efficacy
Average maintained illuminance on a working plane: lux/W/m2

Installed load efficiency ratio

Target load efficacy / Installed load

Rated luminous efficacy

Rated lumen output of the lamp / rated power consumption Lumens per watt
7 UNEP 2006

Introduction Definitions and Common Terms

Room index
Ratio for the plan dimensions of the room

Target load efficiency

I t ll d load efficacy considered achievable Installed l d ffi id d hi bl under best efficiency Lux/W/m Lux/W/m

Utilization factor
A measure of the effectiveness of the lighting scheme
8 UNEP 2006

Introduction Definitions and Common Terms

The inverse square law
Defines the relationship between illuminance from a point source and distance

E=I/ E1 d12 = E2 d22

d2

E = Iluminance I = Luminous intensity d = distance

9 UNEP 2006

Introduction Definitions and Common Terms

Color temperature
Color appearance of a lamp and the light it pp p g produces ( ) Measured in Kelvin (K) Incandescent lamps: true value color temperature Fluorescent and high intensity discharge (HID) lamps: correlated color temperature
10 UNEP 2006

Introduction Definitions and Common Terms

Color rendering index (CRI)
Color rendering groups
1A 1B

CIE general color rendering Index(Ra)

Ra

Typical application

> 90

Wherever accurate color rendering is g required e.g. color printing inspection Wherever accurate color judgments are necessary or good color rendering is required for reasons of appearance e.g. display lighting Wherever moderate color rendering is required Wherever color rendering is of little g significance but marked distortion of color is unacceptable Wherever color rendering is of no importance at all and marked distortion of colour is acceptable

80 < Ra < 90

2 3

60 < Ra < 80 40 < Ra < 60

20 < Ra < 40

Table 1. Applications of color rendering groups (Bureau of Energy Efficiency, 2005)

11 UNEP 2006

Training Agenda: Electricity

Introduction Types of lighting systems Assessment of lighting systems Energy efficiency opportunities gy y pp

12 UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems

I Incandescent lamps d tl g g p Tungsten Halogen Lamps Fluorescent lamps High pressure sodium lamps Low pressure sodium lamps Mercury vapour Metal halide Blended LED lamps
13 UNEP 2006

HID l lamps

Types of Lighting Systems Incandescent Lamps

Emit radiation mainly in the visible region Bulb contains vacuum or gas filling Efficacy: 12 lumen / Watt Color rendering index: 1A Color temperature: 2500 2700 K L Lamp life <2000 hrs lif 2000 h
(BEE India, 2005)
14 UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems Tungsten-Halogen T ngsten Halogen Lamps

Tungsten filament and a halogen gas filled bulb Tungsten atoms evaporate from the hot filament and move to cooler wall of bulb fil t d t l ll f b lb Efficacy: 18 lumens/Watt Color rendering index: 1A p Color temperature: warm Lamp life < 4000 hrs
Advantages: More compact Longer life More and whiter light Disadvantages: Cost more Increased IR and UV Handling problems

Tungsten halogen lamps 15 (BEE India, 2005) UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems Fluorescent Lamps

3 5 ti times as efficient as standard incandescent ffi i t t d di d t lamps and last 10 20 times longer Electricity Electricit passes thro gh a gas or metallic vapor through apor and causes radiation Fluorescent tubes are hot cathode lamps

(BEE India, 2005) I di

16 UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems Fluorescent Lamps

Different types (T12, T10, T8 and T5) differing in diameter and efficiency d ffi i Most efficient at ambient temperature bi t t t of 20-30 oC, Compact fluorescent lamps (CFL) have much smaller luminaries
Features: Halo-phosphate Efficacy 80 lumens/Watt (HF gear increases this by 10%) C l R d i Index 2-3 Color Rendering I d 23 Color Temperature Any Lamp Life 7-15,000 hours Tri phosphor Tri-phosphor Efficacy 90 lumens/Watt Color Rendering Index 1A-1B Color Temperature Any Lamp Life 7-15,000 hours

Compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) 17 (BEE India, 2005) UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems High P Hi h Pressure Sodium (HPS) Lamps S di L

Used in outdoor and industrial applications Consist of: ballast, high- voltage electronic starter, ceramic arc tube, xenon gas filling, sodium, mercury No starting electrodes High efficacy: 60 80 lumen/Watt Color rendering index: 1 - 2 Color temperature: warm Lamp life < 24,000 hrs
18

BEE India, 2005

UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems Low Pressure Sodium (LPS) Lamps

Commonly i l d d in the HID family C l included i th f il Highest efficacy: 100 - 200 lumen/Watt Poorest quality light: colors appear black, white or grey shades Limited to outdoor applications y g Efficacy: Color rendering index: 3 Color temperature: yellow Lamp life < 16,000 hours 16 000
19 UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems Mercury Vapor Lamps

Oldest HID lamp Consists of: arc tube with mercury and argon gas and quartz envelope, third electrode, outer envelope electrode phosphor coated bulb, outer glass envelope Long life and low initial costs Very poor efficacy: 30 65 lumens/Watt Color rendering index: 3 Color temperature: intermediate Lamp life: 16000 24000 hours
20 UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems Metal H lid L M t l Halide Lamps

Works similar to tungsten halogen lamps g g p Largest choice of color, size and rating Better efficacy than other HID lamps: 80 lumen/Watt Require high voltage ignition pulse but some have third electrode for starting Color rendering index: 1A 2 Color temperature: 3000 6000 K Lamp life: 6000 20,000 hours
21 UNEP 2006

BEE India, 2005

Types of Lighting Systems Blended L Bl d d Lamps

Two-in-one: 2 light sources in 1 gas filled bulb Two in one : Quartz mercury discharge tube Tungsten filament Suitable for flame proof areas Fit into incandescent lamps fixtures Efficacy: 20 30 lumen/Watt Lamp life < 8000 hours Hi h power factor: 0.95 High f t 0 95 Typical rating: 160 W
BEE India, 2005 I di
22 UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems LED Lamps L

Newest type of energy efficient lamp yp gy p Two types: red-blue-green array phosphor-coated blue lamp Emit visible light in a very narrow spectrum and can produce white light Used in exit signs, traffic signals, and the technology is rapidly progressing Significant energy savings: 82 93% Longest lamp life: 40,000 100,000 hours
23 UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems Reflectors

Impact how much light reaches area and distribution pattern Diffuse reflectors: 70-80% reflectance but declining in time BEE India,
2005

painted or powder coated white finish Specular reflectors: 85 96% reflectance and less decline in time 85-96% fl t dl d li i ti Polished or mirror-like Not suitable for industrial open-type strip 24 fixtures UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems Gear

Ballast g Current limiting device Helps voltage build-up in fluorescent lights Ignitors Start metal halide and sodium vapor lamps

25 UNEP 2006

Types of Lighting Systems Comparing lamps

Type of Lamp
Incandescent I d t Fluorescent Lamps Compact fluorescent lamps (CFL) High pressure mercury (HPMV) Halogen lamps

Lum / Watt
Rang e 8-18 8 18 46-60 40 70 40-70 44-57 Av g. 14 50 60 50

Color Rendering Index

Excellent E ll t Good w.r.t. coating Very good Fair

Typical Application
Homes, restaurants, general H t t l lighting, emergency lighting Offices, shops, hospitals, homes Hotels, shops, homes, offices General lighting in factories, garages, car parking, flood lighting Display, flood lighting, stadium exhibition grounds, construction areas General lighting in factories, ware houses, street lighting Roadways, tunnels, canals, street lighting

Life (Hours)
1000 5000 8000 10000 8000-10000 5000

18-24

20

Excellent

2000-4000

High pressure sodium (HPSV) SON Low pressure sodium (LPSV) SOX

67121 101175

90 150

Fair Poor

6000-12000 6000-12000

26 UNEP 2006

Training Agenda: Electricity

Introduction Types of lighting systems Assessment of lighting systems Energy efficiency opportunities gy y pp

27 UNEP 2006

Assessment of Lighting Systems Designing with Light

Better lighting: increased productivity Two main questions for designer: Choose correct lighting level Choose quality of light (color rendering)

28 UNEP 2006

Assessment of Lighting Systems Designing with Light

Recommended light levels for different tasks (BEE India 2005) India,
Illuminance level (lux)
General Lighting for rooms and areas used either d d ith infrequently and/or casual or simple visual tasks 20 50 70 100 150 200 300 General lighting for interiors 450 1500

Examples of Area of Activity

Minimum service illuminance in exterior circulating areas, outdoor o tdoor stores , stockyards stock ards Exterior walkways & platforms. Boiler house. Transformer yards, furnace rooms etc. Circulation areas in industry, stores and stock rooms. Minimum service illuminance on the task Medium bench & machine work, general process in chemical and food industries, casual reading and filing activities. Hangers, inspection, drawing offices, fine bench and machine assembly, colour work, critical drawing tasks. Very fine bench and machine work, instrument & small precision mechanism assembly; electronic components, gauging & inspection of small intricate parts (may be partly provided by local task lighting) Minutely detailed and precise work, e.g. Very small parts of instruments, watch making, engraving.

Additional localized lighting for visually exacting tasks

3000

29 UNEP 2006

Assessment of Lighting Systems Recommended Illuminance Levels

Scale f ill i S l of illuminance
Illuminance for all non-working interiors > 20 Lux Factor 1.5 is the smallest significant difference in ff t f ill i i effect of illuminance Therefore the following scale is recommended:

203050751001502003005007501000 15002000, Lux

30 UNEP 2006

Assessment of Lighting Systems Recommended Illuminance Levels

Illuminance ranges recommended for interior or activity
Middle value (R) for working interiors
Higher value (H) for visual work L Lower value (L) where accuracy is nonl h i important
31 UNEP 2006

Assessment of Lighting Systems Methodology for Efficiency Study

Step 1: Make inventory of li hti St 1 M k i t f lighting system t elements and transformers
Table: Device rating, population and use profile
S. N o. Plant Locati on Lighting Device & Ballast Type Rating in Watts Lamp & Ballast Population Numbers Use / Shifts as I / II / III shifts / Day

Table: Lighting transformer/rating and population profile

S. N o. Plant Locatio n Lighting Transformer Rating (kVA) Numbers Installed Measurement Provisions Available Volts / Amps / kW/ Energy

32 UNEP 2006

Assessment of Lighting Systems Methodology for Efficiency Study

Step 2: Measure and document the Lux levels Step 3: Measure and document the voltage and power consumption at input points Step 4: Compare the measured Lux values with standard values as reference Step 5: Analyze the failure rates of lamps lamps, ballasts and the actual life expectancy levels

33 UNEP 2006

Assessment of Lighting Systems Methodology for Efficiency Study

Step-6 : identify improvement options, for example: Maximum sunlight use options through transparent roof sheets Replacements of lamps and ballasts to more p p energy efficient types Selecting interior colors for light reflection Modifying layout as per needs Providing individual / group controls for lighting
34 UNEP 2006

Training Agenda: Electricity

Introduction Types of lighting systems Assessment of lighting systems Energy efficiency opportunities gy y pp

35 UNEP 2006

Energy Efficiency Opportunities Use Natural Day Lighting

North lighting G Glass strips across the roof f Sky lights with fiber reinforced plastic y g p (FRP) Atrium with FRP dome Natural light from windows
36 UNEP 2006

Energy Efficiency Opportunities De-lamping to Reduce Excess Lighting

Effective method to reduce energy gy consumption Reducing lamp height combined with de-lamping: illuminance hardly affected Complicated for series wired ballasts p p Less problematic with parallel wired ballast

37

UNEP 2006

Energy Efficiency Opportunities Task Lighting

L Low wattage lamps at task tt l tt k General illuminance at lower level Benefits:
Reduce number of lighting fixtures Reduce lamp wattage Save considerable energy ette u a ce Better illuminance Aesthetically pleasing ambience
38 UNEP 2006

Energy Efficiency Opportunities High Efficiency Lamps & Luminaries

Examples (9 75% savings): Metal halide lamps to replace mercury / sodium vapor lamps di l p g HPSV lamps where color rendering is not critical LED panel indicator lamps to replace filament lamps L i Luminaries with mirror optics instead of i ith i ti i t d f conventional painted ones
39

UNEP 2006

Energy Efficiency Opportunities Reduction of Lighting Feeder Voltage

5 6

Perce entage

1 2 3
Supply voltage percentage

Can save energy Provided drop in light output is acceptable

2 1

4 5 3

1) Lamp current 4) Lamp output

2) Circuit power, 5) lamp voltage

3) Lamp power, 6) lamp efficiency

Effect of voltage variation of fluorescent tube light parameters (BEE India, 2005)

40

UNEP 2006

Energy Efficiency Opportunities Electronic Ballasts instead of El t i B ll t i t d f g Electromagnetic Ballasts

Oscillators that convert supply frequency to about 20,000 30 000 Hz 20 000 30,000 Available for fluorescent tube lights, LPSV and HPSV lamps Benefits in fluorescent tube lights: Reduced power loss: 1 Watt instead of 10-15 10 15 Watt Improved efficacy at higher frequencies Eli i i of starter: no fli k i Elimination f flickering
41 UNEP 2006

Energy Efficiency Opportunities Low Loss Electromagnetic Ballasts for Tube Lights
Loss per tube lights: p g
Standard ballasts: 10 15 Watts Low loss ballasts: 8 - 10 W tt L l b ll t Watts

42 UNEP 2006

Energy Efficiency Opportunities Timers, Twilight Switches & Occupancy Sensors

Timers: switching of unnecessary lights Twilight switches: depending on availability of daylight Occupancy sensors: depending on presence of people Applicable for general areas, conference rooms, cubicles, restrooms, exteriors , , ,
43 UNEP 2006

Energy Efficiency Opportunities T5 Fluorescent Tube Light

Slimmer tubes than T12 and T8 tubes Improved luminaire efficiencies by 7% and with 7%, super-reflective aluminum luminaire by 11-30% Mercury reduction: 3 mg instead of 15 mg per lamp Can only be operated with electronic ballasts and not existing luminaries

44 UNEP 2006

Energy Efficiency Opportunities Lighting Maintenance

Light levels decrease >50% due to aging lamps and dirt on fixtures, lamps and room surfaces p Maintenance options:
Clean equipment R l Replace l lenses Keep spaces bright and clean Re-lamping
45 UNEP 2006

Training Session on Energy Equipment E i t

Lighting
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

46 UNEP GERIAP

Disclaimer and References

Thi PowerPoint training session was prepared as part of This P P i tt i i i d t f the project Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction from Industry in Asia and the Pacific (GERIAP). While y f ( ) reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct and properly referenced, UNEP does not accept responsibility for referenced the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. UNEP, 2006. The GERIAP project was funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) Full references are included in the textbook chapter that is available on www.energyefficiencyasia.org
47

UNEP 2006