Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Overview
Why Change? Research Data History of changes BCA 2010 Volume 1 and 2 Changes AS 1926.1 - 2007 - Major Changes Existing Pools built Prior to 1991 Guidance Information and Documentation Contact details
Why Change ?
Why Change?
The primary question of interest:
Are the probabilities of drowning different for the different types of pool barriers and how can this be quantified?
Research Data
Research Data
The Studies cited Pitt and Balanda (1991) Queensland: Fenced verses Non fenced pools Stevenson et al (2002) WA: Four sided versus three-sided pool fencing Barker et al (2003) Queensland: Isolations pool fencing (four sided) versus three sided pool fencing (with child safe doors and windows)
Research Data
Pitt and Balanda (1991) This paper looked at the difference in rates of unintentional immersion in pools located in Brisbane for children up to 13 years of age with fences and pools with no fences. Period covered 1984 to 1988
Stevenson et al (2002) The subject of this study was the difference in drowning rates between pools with four sided fencing and pools with three sided fencing where there was no requirement for child safe doors or windows in the residence. Period covered 1988 - 2000
Barker et al (2003) The report analysed Queensland data report by QISU aimed to disentangle the causes of the difference in safety between three and four sided fencing. Period covered 1992 - 2001
Research Data
Each of the reports compares the safety performance of the two types barrier by using relative risk ratio Relative Risk Ratio is the ratio of probabilities of the occurrence of drowning with one type of fence and a second type of fence respectively Given by the expression RR = d2 / d1
Research Data
Study Pool Fence Type 1 Pitt and Balanda (1991) Stevenson et al (2002) Non Fenced Three sided unknown status of doors and windows Three sided + child safe doors and windows Three sided + child safe doors and windows Type 2 Fenced Four sided 3.76 1.78 Relative Risk
Four Sided
2.88
Four Sided
10.98
(Note: All children who drowned where allowed into pool area by parent)
History of change
History of change
The BCA currently references the AS 1926.1 1993 Fencing for swimming pools and AS 1926.2 1995 Location of fencing for private swimming pools. New editions of these standards were published in 2007 by Standards Australia. However the standards were not referenced in the BCA due to differing approaches between jurisdictions on whether childresistant doorsets are permitted to form part of a barrier for an outdoor pool.
History of change
ABCB National Technical Summit in 2009 discussed variations between jurisdictions for swimming pool barriers Included representatives from State and Territory administrations and leading Australian industry groups to progress the Variation Reduction Strategy (VRS). The NTS resolved that the decision on whether to allow the use of childresistant door sets in the BCA, was a matter of public policy This required the direction of the Board of the ABCB. At its meeting in July 2009, the Board adopted the position to:
Exclude the use of child-resistant door sets in barriers for outdoor pools in BCA 2010; and Adopt the 2007 editions of the Australian Standards 1926.1 and 1926.2
STATE & TERRITORY BUILDING REGULATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Administration Appeals Registrations Refurbishments Building standard
TECHNICAL STANDARDS
Takes effect 1 May each year BCA is the communitys minimum standard for new building work Referenced in State & Territory building law Developed by Australian Building Codes Board (ABCB) Amended annually Not best practice To overcome market failure Solutions must be cost effective
Guidance
Functional Statement
Performance Requirement
Building Solutions
Mandatory
Methods of achieving compliance
DTS Provisions
Alternative Solution
Documentary Evidence Verification Method Comparative Analysis Expert Judgement
Prescriptive measures
Assessment methods
ii.
b) Where some or all of the heating required by (a) is by a gas heater or a heat pump, the swimming pool must have
i. ii. a cover other than when located in a conditioned space; and a time switch in accordance with Specification J6 to control the operation of the heater.
c)
A time switch must be provided in accordance with Specification J6 to control the operation of a circulation pump for a swimming pool.
d) For the purpose of J7.3, a swimming pool does not include a spa pool.
11 BCA 2010 Volume 1 20 Energy Efficiency J7.4 Spa pool heating and pumping til n umust be by a) Heating for a spa pool having a capacity of 680 L or more r4 o 2 ss la C to b) Where some or all of the heating required by (a) is by a gas heater or a heat pump, the ly spa pool must have pp a T O N esswitch must be provided in accordance with Specification J6 to control the c) Ao time D operation of a circulation pump for a spa pool having a capacity of 680 L or more.
i. a solar heater; or ii. a heater using reclaimed energy; or iii. a gas heater; or iv. v. a heat pump; or a combination of 2 or more of (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) i. a cover; and ii. a push button and a time switch in accordance with Specification J6 to control the operation of the heater.
A child-resistant door set is defined as a door set that comprises a door, door frame, self-closing device and self-latching device, that is designed to provide an access way from the building to the swimming pool.
11 be by a solar heater a)Heating for a swimming pool other than a spa pool must 20 not boosted by electric resistance heating. til L or more must be by b)Heating for a spa pool having a capacity of 680 un ly pp a T O N c)Where some or all s the heating required by (b) is by a gas or heat pump, a of spa pool must have oe D
i. a solar heater; or ii. a gas heater; or iii. a heat pump; or iv. a combination of 2 or more of (i), (ii) and (iii). i. a cover; and ii. a push button and a time switch to control the operation of the heater.
d)A time switch to control the operation of a circulation pump for a swimming pool other than a spa pool with capacity of less than 680 L.
Australian Building Codes Board, Australian Industry Group, Australian Institute of Building Surveyors, Australian Safe Communities Foundation, Australian Wire Industry Association, Consumers Federation of Australia, Department of Local Government, Housing and Sport (NT), Department of Local Government, Planning, Sport and Recreation (Queensland), Kidsafe National, National Injury Surveillance Unit Office of Fair Trading NSW Consumer Protection Agency, Planning South Australia, Royal Life Saving Society Australia Swimming Pool and Spa Association of NSW, Swimming Pool and Spa Association of Victoria, Swimming Pool and Spa Association of Western Australia
AS 1926.1 - 2007
Title change
Using the word fence in the title is misleading as it is not the only element used to enclose a pool. 1993 version Swimming pool safety Part 1: Fencing for swimming pools 2007 version Swimming pool safety Part 1: Safety barriers for swimming pools
AS 1926.1 2007
Defines pool area as the area surrounding the pool that is separated from the rest of the allotment by a safety barrier.
AS 1926.1 2007
Fencing Height
2.3.1 effective fencing height shall be not less than 1.2m
Fencing Height
2.3.1 minimum height of 1200mm will remain but changes to nonclimbable zone have been made
AS 1926.1 2007
The clear span radii has been changed from 1200mm to 900mm A non climbable zone is defined as a zone consisting of a barrier as well as the associated space within 900mm of the barrier intended to inhibit climbing of the barrier by children. This includes any point along the length of the barrier and its associated space.
The location of the NCZ shall be on the outside of the fencing, except for a boundary fence. A boundary fence shall be not less than 1800 mm high. The NCZ may be located at the top on the inside of the fencing (see Figures 2.1, 2.2(a) to 2.2(c), 2.3(A) and 2.3(B)).
1800m Height Includes non climbable zone Not more than 15 from vertical Where fence intersects a retaining wall:
Must have 900mm return; or Overhang by 900mm
Height now 1800mm Now includes non climbable zone If balcony balustrade within NCZ must comply with AS 1926.1
Section 3 Restructure Now performance based on the loadings applied to each section of a barrier when tested. Allows the appendices to be informative and give guidance on how barriers can be tested.
Appendix A - Restructure New testing procedure for pool barriers. Bringing the testing procedure up to date.
Allows qualified testing companies to test the pool barriers using the same loads on the elements of the pool barrier using an approved suitable method other than the same testing regime that can only be completed by one or two companies.
Above ground pools Further clarified For aboveground pools, including inflatable pools, the walls of the pool shall be considered an effective barrier provided they comply with Clauses 2.3.1, 2.3.3, 2.3.4 and 2.3.5. A barrier shall be placed around ladders at the access point to an aboveground pool. Ladders and filters shall be located away from the non-climbable zone (NCZ) so as not to compromise the barrier. NOTE: Aboveground pools pose a particular hazard because of the tendency to install climbableobjects against the pool, which may used for access into the pool.
AS 1926.1 2007
Appendix D Strength Test For Flexible Materials And Components has been deleted and replaced with Section 3 under clause 3.3.2 Bringing into line with the new performance based Section 3
New Appendix D Examples Of Pool Fences Broad guide to some of the main constructional criteria that some of the more common types of fencing will have to meet in order to satisfy this Standard
Each post and footing shall withstand a horizontal 330 N force at 1200 mm above finished ground level. After loading, there shall be no permanent damage to any post, The footings shall not loosen to impair the effectiveness of the barrier and any gate shall meet the requirements of Clauses 2.5.3, 2.5.4 and 3.4. This test can be conducted in the field by fastening one end of a calibrated spring balance to the post 1200 mm above ground level and pulling on the other end of the balance until a load of 33 kg is achieved. After application of the load, inspect the post and footing for any looseness or damage.
The gate shall close and latch from any position from resting on the latching mechanism to fully open, under both of the following conditions: (i) Under the natural weight of the gate (ii) After a mass of 25 kg supported by the top rail is placed at a point 100 mm from the outer edge of the locking stile of the gate
Intended to indicate whether the automatic closing and latching mechanism is likely to remain effective after the gate has been subject to deflection, either under its own weight or as a result of children swinging on it The latching device and posts of the fencing to which the gate is attached shall be capable of retaining the gate in a closed position
When undertaking final inspections of pool barriers Building Surveyors and Building Inspectors may request evidence of the in situ testing or may also required to be present to witness the testing to ensure that the construction of the barrier meets the structural adequacy criteria and that the gate operates correctly.
Changes to AS1926.2
Locations of Swimming Pool Barriers
Preface
Clarity to user
Scope
Both notes are superfluous and add nothing to the new Standard
Clarity to user
Clause 4.3
Regulative authorities can call up changes in their legislation as they see appropriate, with specific regards to this Swimming pool barrier orientation without compromising the rest of the document.
Clarity to user
Changes to AS1926.3
Water Recirculation and Filtration Systems
11 year old girl died 25 March 2006 Drowned caused entrapped on the cover of the main drain of spa pool within the apartment complex Entrapment was due to significant suction pressure as a result of a blockage in the main drain during the process of pebblecreting of the wall and floor of the spa during construction Blockage Soft reconstituted cement slurry, solid cement, a mixture of pebble blue chip, sand and dirt Estimated that blockage was a least 200mm in length
Absence of an approved dual suction system on both spa pumps Non complying active main drain cover without secondary suction point and vacuum relief device An emergency stop switch for the spa pumps and alarm may have avoided the tragedy Only one pump was operating. Had both pumps been operating (spa jets) the hazard would have been sensationally increased. Active main drain concentrated all suction to centre of spa with suction pressure of -88Kpa or 350Kg (equivalent)
Action taken to prohibit the inclusion of an active main filter drain in the floor of spa pools in future Action taken to require the certification of pools and spa compliance with regulations by an independent and qualified expert prioir to handover for use by occupants Action taken where the pool/ spa form part of the property development an occupation certificate is not issued by the Principal Certifying Authority unless and until that authority has satisfied themselves the pool/spa has been constructed in accordance with statutory and other building requirements and is safe for use
BCA compliance must be assessed prior to issuing a building permit Designers must be provide details to the RBS as part of a Building Permit Application for Pool / Spa An active main drain cover shall be dome shaped; and anti vortex. Apertures in the drain covers shall not allow the passage of an 8 mm circular rod A dome shaped outlet shall have a convex shape in elevation with a minimum height of 8 mm Openings in covers shall be not less than three times the cross-sectional area of the common suction line onto which they connect
Existing Pools
Existing Pools
Applies to pools built prior to 8 April 1991 with no requirement for fencing Building Regulations 2006 Part 7 Division 1 Regulations 701 to 705 - No change to regulations Can comply with AS1926.1 - 1993 Allows for the use of child resistant doors sets and windows and can continue to be used The Building Regulatory Advisory Committee (BRAC) is currently reviewing its policy around four sided fencing to existing pools built prior to 1991.
A door must not be installed between a Class 1 or Class 10a building and an outdoor swimming pool enclosure of the door forms part of the swimming pool safety barrier, because the use of a child resistant door set described in the Standard is prevented under 3.9.3.0 (b)
Q. What if my barrier has been designed prior to 1 May 2010 but yet to be installed? A. No need to update design Section 10 of the Building Act Applies Q. Do I need to upgrade an existing barrier as a result of the changes? A. No. The changes to not apply retrospectively Q. I am doing maintenance and existing fence, do I need to apply the changes? A. No. The Regulations allow for maintenance and repair using like materials Q. I am replacing a barrier, do I need to apply the changes? A. Yes. This is a new barrier and will require approval.
Current 2006-05 being Updated Will cover the BCA changes and why Is primarily aimed at Building Surveyors and Designers Will continue to have information on existing pools
To
be
da p u
ed t
Enforcement - responsibility of the municipal council of the area where an allotment contains a swimming pool or spa. The regulations prescribe a fine in excess of $5,000 on an owner or occupier who fails to comply Local councils can also issue a $220 on the spot fine The Act contains penalties in excess of $10,000 for failure to carry out work in accordance with the building regulations. An example of non-compliance may be failure to install self-closing or selflatching devices or allowing climbable elements to be located within NCZ
Phone: 131 242 Fax: 1300 65 49 49 sales@saiglobal.com http://infostore.saiglobal.com/ Melbourne Unit 3, 18 Salmon Street Port Melbourne VIC 3207