Religious Debate in YouTube Ramadhan 2012

Abdul Rahman - '88888abdulrahman'

I found this video very interesting because it shows how stupid these Islam Haters are. Just look at people who 'like' it! Anyone who believes in this video should read the Quran. Show me in Quran where it says those who commit adultery must be stoned to death OR show me just one contradiction in Quran, I will give you USD10,000 via Western Union. I swear on my God Almighty and Al-Quran. Stoning to death was a Jewish law used by Muslims before the verse sent down by God only to flog adulterers 88888abdulrahman 13 hours ago Shriah Law like any other law will give people chance to defend themself. The punishment will deter people from committing crime. Is it harsh compare to Guantanamo bay and Abu Ghraib prison where there is no law at all? Innocents released after being tortured like animals. Shriah law never treat prisoners like animals, unlike the U.S. 88888abdulrahman 13 hours ago Taqiyya is only used in an awkward situation, no other reason! Such as pretending to leave Islam after being threatened with death. Or after being tortured by American Dogs in Guantanamo Bay. Or lying in order to save lives. Muslims will lie to Nazi in order to save Jews. Is that wrong? Whoever says Shriah Law and Taqiyya are wrong.. seriously need his head examined! 88888abdulrahman 13 hours ago As for the Quran, it is in it's original language, no human author, only one version, without error, un-edit and un-revised, and it is clear in instructions. Quran is full of logics, and no contradiction whatsoever. It is the book you should be reading if you want to find the truth through logic. Not the bible where you know already full of contradictions. 88888abdulrahman 13 hours ago My question to the Christians; if Jesus is God why did he pray, and why does Jesus refer to God as his Father , and why does Jesus cry out My God, my God, why have you forsaken me, why didnt he know when Judgement Day was, and if the Trinity consists of all beings being co-equal, how come the Father knows more than the Son? 88888abdulrahman 13 hours ago Because Jesus isn't God, he is Messiah, the one to whom God gave power and rule. He gave references from the bible Matt. 28:18, 1 Cor. 15:24-28 and John 17:1-3. je005ay 13 hours ago are you a Christian???? 88888abdulrahman in reply to je005ay (Show the comment) 13 hours ago I am Unitarian Christian :) je005ay in reply to 88888abdulrahman (Show the comment) 13 hours ago Do Unitarians still believe that all you have to do to enter Heaven is to believe that Jesus died for your sins? What about the people before Jesus time or who never knew about Jesus? Will they go to Hell? 88888abdulrahman in reply to je005ay (Show the comment) 13 hours ago

No, this isn't all you have to do. This is the beginning of what you have to do. Once you do this, you will automatically do the other things necessary. Jesus' sacrifice covered all men from Adam to the last man, Jesus himself (1 Cor. 15:21-22, 45) Jesus' sacrifice is offered to all men. Only those who knowingly and willfuly reject it will stand before God in judgment without a sacrifice or High Priest. je005ay in reply to 88888abdulrahman (Show the comment) 13 hours ago It has been said by all Christians including yourself that if you believe Jesus died for our sins and accept him as your savior you are saved, no matter what evil you do which is against the verses in the bible. So only those who reject Christ as their savior will be judged did I get this right? So those that did not profess this are going to hell? Jesus died for all mankind and even those who came before??? Hmm...funny that God did not require confession of them then, seeing God is all knowing He could have easily instructed them in their teachings to pray to Christ, or worship christ, but Prophets only worship God and gave the message of the oneness of God. Why did God have to incarnate Himself and die for us? 88888abdulrahman in reply to je005ay (Show the comment) 13 hours ago God didn't incarnate Himself. God dwelled in a pious man whose body served as God's Temple so that God could make Himself known to men. Because God's spirit, which had once dwelled in him without limit (John 3:34) had left him because all of the sins of Mankind from Adam on, had been placed upon him as the Lamb of sacrifice in the Temple. God does not dwell with sin. je005ay in reply to 88888abdulrahman (Show the comment) 13 hours ago God is almighty and void of any needs such as sleep, eat, or rest and it is clear that Jesus did all these things. That his body was no more then mortal. God does not need to reveal Himself in the flesh in order for us to know He exist. It is clear by His words through the Holy Books, and signs by looking at His creation, that God exists. 88888abdulrahman in reply to je005ay (Show the comment) 13 hours ago Although Jesus is only man but he is the Son of God. God had conceived in the womb of a woman. No other man was made by God in this way. je005ay in reply to 88888abdulrahman (Show the comment) 13 hours ago If this is the case then God has brought forth Adam and Eve with in that same sprit but this does not make them God or Goddess, do they? If Jesus is only a man then why if he in your words he is not God or equal to God, why do you worship him like God? Why so you ask help from him as if he were equal to the The Most High and why do you treat him more then a messenger? Can you explain how Jesus can died for your sins? 88888abdulrahman in reply to je005ay (Show the comment) 13 hours ago

In the Levitical Temple, before it's destruction by the Babylonians, the sons of Aaron were commanded by God to take an unblemished male lamb, and sacrifice it for the sins of the people. All the people would go to God in prayer as the blood of the sacrifice was offered to God by the priests in order to place their sin upon the lamb. The blood of an innocent animal covers sin from God's sight, but doesn't eliminate it. The blood of an innocent human eliminates it utterly and once and for all. je005ay in reply to 88888abdulrahman (Show the comment) 13 hours ago What do you mean cover sin's from God sight but doesn't eliminate it? So the sins are still there? So whats the point of covering it up as God is Most Knowing, can see everything, and Most Wise? Are you saying God cannot eliminates sins and He needs blood of an innocent human to eliminates them? Sound like an evil god who is powerless without human blood. Ok, now talking about Paul the Apostle...why are Pauls letters taken as the Word of God when at the time they were no more than letters? 88888abdulrahman in reply to je005ay (Show the comment) 13 hours ago can we discuss this via inbox.. Im sick of typing text in image! je005ay in reply to 88888abdulrahman (Show the comment) 13 hours ago I prefer here as our discussion can be shared by everyone 88888abdulrahman in reply to je005ay (Show the comment) 13 hours ago Fine. Paul was appointed as an Apostle to the gentiles by God and He gave to him what to say to the gentiles just as He did to other Apostles. Paul was specifically chosen by God to serve as a prophet to the gentiles. Jesus struck him blind on the road because he was killing Christians, thinking he was doing God a favor by cleansing the heretics from Jerusalem. God left Paul blind for three days until he could "see" that what he was doing was wrong, and not God's will at all. Once Paul could "see", then he could see again. An Apostle was sent to him from God to heal his eyes and then take him to the others and explain what God had said regarding him. For his arrogance in killing Christians, he was made apostle to the gentiles which most Jews would hate because of their unclean habits. Therefore, Paul's writings to the gentiles are considered holy because God gave the words to Paul by inspiration and told him to take them to the nations. je005ay in reply to 88888abdulrahman (Show the comment) 13 hours ago

What separates Paul from any other false prophets who claims to have received revelation from God such as Jim Jones and David Koresh? You have no evidence that Jesus spoke about Paul. You have a scripture whose author is assumed to be Paul by most Christians and this scripture is the only one which speaks about Paul. You should seriously examine who Paul is in your own personal beliefs. I personally do not have a grudge against Paul. But if you look at historical facts based on the bio of Paul and his writing, that was enough to convince me that things written by Paul had less to do with what Jesus taught but moreover what he wanted to be taught about Jesus. All these mixed in with

Politics, Roman laws, fabricated stories and so on, all got thrown in the final copy of the bible. I have gone in circles with Christians on this argument about Paul. I have read the scriptures of the bible where he seemed sexist, and in other parts where he starts to speak for himself, but telling people he is speaking for Jesus and on and on it goes. What I honestly could not understand is, you as a Unitrainain, reject trinity as it does not make sense, and yet you believe in Paul writing and the bible which is also full of contradiction? I did not say this! There are hundreds of eminent christian scholars out there including New Testament Scholar, Dr Bart Ehrman who say Bible New Testament is heavily corrupted. Another Christian scholar, Kenneth Cragg, the Anglican Bishop of Jerusalem, says: "...Not so the New testament...There is condensation and editing; there is choice reproduction and witness. The Gospels have come through the mind of the church behind the authors. They represent experience and history..." See "The Call of the Minaret," Kenneth Cragg, p 277 Famous Theologians and Historians believe that the so called apostle Paul also known as Saul of Tarsus was not truthful. Among them were Bishop John S. Spong (Episcopal Bishop of Newark) : "Paul's words are not the Words of God. They are the words of Paul- a vast difference." (Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism, p. 104, Harper San Francisco, 1991). As we all know, Paul didn't think much of the Jewish law, and brought his own new doctrine up. What makes this all the more interesting is that this isn't a simple Muslim accusation, far from it. In fact when we read the Gospel of Acts, we find that Jews were angry at Paul for breaking the law and making it nothing! In Acts 21: 27-30 , note the people back then had noticed Paul's attempts at trying to dis-regard the law! And as we see, this is why the Jew's disliked him because Paul had made the law into nothing, and made it useless with his own new doctrine. In todays court of law any information given by a person that is contradictory and illogical would not be accepted, and the speaker who gave the information is discredited and cannot be taken as a reliable person at all. This precisely to be the case with Paul, when he talks about his supposed meeting with Jesus. He contradicts himself and his stories are also illogical. The first mention of Paul meeting Jesus on the road to Damascus is mentioned in Acts 9: 3-7. So few things to note, Paul is on a journey, he then sees a light and hears a voice, this voice is supposedly Jesus. Paul then asks Jesus what do you want me to do? The response by Jesus is for Paul to go to the city and it will be made known to him over there. Now lets read whats Acts 26: 1418.says. Note the difference, in the first account all Jesus tells him is go to the city to find out what you must do, in this account in Acts 26 we see Jesus already telling Paul what he meant to do! So which one is it? Will Paul know what his purpose is in the city? Or did he already know? Acts 9: 7: "7. And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man" So as we can see, Acts verse 7 says that the men who accompanied Paul heard a voice, but saw no man, they saw nobody.

Now let us compare this with Acts 22:9: "9. And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me." So now as you can see, in Acts 22 Paul says the man saw a light, but heard no voice! In Acts 9 Paul says the men saw no man, but heard a voice! So based on this information we can also say that the entire book of Acts is now in doubt, and is also unreliable, we can also say the entire character of Paul is in doubt and is unreliable, as we clearly see he cannot stay consistent at all. It does not end there, there are still many other contradictions and a logical fallacy. Acts 26: 14: "14. And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks." So as you can see, the verse says that Paul and the men with all fell down, easy to see and understand. Let us read what Acts 9 and 22 have to say. Acts 9: 7 : "7. And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man" So as you can all see, Acts 9 shows the men did not fall to the ground, but stood speechless, they were shocked that they stood still. No one fell down, hence we have another contradiction. So which one was it? Did the men with Paul all fall down? Or did they stay standing? It seems Paul cannot give a straight answer! It doesnt end there, let us read Acts 22. Acts 22:7: "7. And I fell unto the ground, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?" So we now see Paul saying that he fell! Not everyone, but him alone, so now Paul again contradicts himself. So which one is it? Acts 22 and 9 agree that only Paul fell, Acts 26 says that they all fell, which one is it? The answer is it is all a big lie, a hoax made up by Paul. He most likely paid those men with him to act like he saw something. When a liar has a plan, he always fails, they always forget something small, and Paul forgot something small here, this leads to the logical fallacy. Acts 9: 8-9: " 8. And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus. 9 And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink." So as we can see, the supposed light that Paul saw blinded him for three days, this is supposedly to show how strong this light was and how great and glorious it was that Paul went blind. Here is the logical fallacy: Acts 22: 9-11: " 9. And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. 10 And I said, What shall I do, LORD? And the Lord said unto me, Arise, and go into Damascus; and there it shall be told thee of all things which are appointed for thee to do. 11 And when I could not see for the glory of that light, being led by the hand of them that were with me, I came into Damascus"

The logical fallacy is for all to see, Paul looks at the light and gets blind, yet the men with him also saw the light and did not get blind! Why was Paul the only one who got blind? Why not everyone else, they saw the same light, so hence if Paul got blind so should have the men with him. This is Paul's blunder, he forgot it wouldnt make sense that he gets blind by looking at the light, while the other men dont get blind. This is all a hoax, Paul faked it all with the help of the men with him, Paul wanted to make it seem like he met Jesus, he made a blunder when he said he got blind because other men didn't get blind and they also saw the light. Paul couldnt even remember the story he fabricated which is why he kept on contradicting himself. Paul lied, Acts is unreliable, the Bible is corrupt, the Quran said so, and the Quran is true. Why still believe in the bible a corrupt book claimed to be the words of God? Blunders made by Paul when he lied could be avoided if he wrote down his fabricated story so he could have remembered it. He should also have made the story a bit more simple, more short so he could easily memorize it. He should have not made the part up about him being blind or else he could have made another person act like he was blind too to make it seem that Paul was not acting since he was the only blind one. If you had two blind men then it would be a bit more believable. Those 4 things would have easily have gotten Paul of the hook, but liars always expose themselves as always been happening in the court of law. Paul is a liar. I am not insulting Christians, but I want to help them to understand the truth as Christians are also my brothers..... 88888abdulrahman in reply to je005ay (Show the comment) 13 hours ago

Muslim fear for Islam feels almost palpable, doesn't it readers? Muslims should have known that, when scimitars went limp, Islam would go limp with them. In the e-world, lies are the most effective weapons they have, and THEY arent working. How can reality be defeated? The nonIslamic world is FAR more progressive, less prone to dictatorships, more respectful of individual rights, more literary, more supportive of science, more athletic, and free of awe for a beheading criminal's "revelations." bangfarang 3 hours ago Hahaha.. its should be the other way around. Lies are the only weapons these Islam Haters like you have! Just watch the video, the first lie it tells Quran teaches stoning adulterers to death. Where in Quran says this? I can show in the Bible Leviticus 24:16. Worst, bible also tell Christians that Disobedient and disrespectful children should be stoned to death.Exodus 21:17!! Islam Haters are really stupid, pathetic and sore losers. Just like small kids. They wont accept defeat even they know they're wrong 88888abdulrahman in reply to bangfarang 2 minutes ago True, all those who like this video are morons who don't want to use common sense. They refused to read and learn Quran yet tell lies about Islam. These morons are no difference from Jews who don't believe in Jesus. Even after they die, they will still be a moron! alanombak in reply to 88888abdulrahman 16 minutes ago

"show me just one contradiction in Quran, I will give you USD10,000" Why 1 contradiction, take 2 itself: 1. FOOD for the HELL-DWELLERS: Sura 88:6 ("For them there will be NO FOOD EXCEPT from a poisonous, thorny plant") is directly contradicting Sura 69:36 ("NOR ANY FOOD EXCEPT filth from the washing of wounds")!! 2. Muhammad flies on a WINGED-DONKEY to HEAVEN and HELL to see it filled with POORPEOPLE and WOMEN respectively even though the JUDGEMENT-DAY itself hasn't yet arrived!! rationalindian10 in reply to 88888abdulrahman 1 day ago If two criminals have done two different types of crimes, you can have two types of punishment. 69:36 is for people who are wealthy,but do not help the poor. Thus they said even their wealth cannot help them now.(read again 69:28). Surah 88:6 is for other type of sins. Clear now? And if I say to you, on the table there is no food but an empty plate. Then I say again, on the table there is no food but an empty glass. Because its true on the table there are one empty plate and a glass. Are the two statements contradict each other? Both of the items are not food. Same as in surah 88:6 and 68:36. There is no contradiction. There goes your 10K!! Just to make my point more clearer. If I say there will be no food but apple, and the next statement I say is...there is no food except meat, then I agree its a contradiction. But "poisonous thorny plant" AND "filth from the washing of wounds" are NOT FOOD. So it is correct to say: There is no food but "poisonous thorny plant". At the same time it is also correct to say there is no food but "filth from the washing of wounds". In both cases there is no food. Understand now? 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 7 hours ago Just to make you happy, I will answer your question 2 which you claimed to be contradiction. 2. Muhammad flies on a WINGED-DONKEY to HEAVEN and HELL to see it filled with POORPEOPLE and WOMEN respectively even though the JUDGEMENT-DAY itself hasn't yet arrived!! Modern Scientists believe that Future, Present and Past exist at the same time. So there is you first answer. Secondly, some people can see the future, people like Nostradamus. So no contradiction ! 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 24 minutes ago Taqiyya is only used in an awkward situation, no other reason! Such as pretending to leave Islam after being threatened with death. Or after being tortured by American Dogs in Guantanamo Bay. Or lying in order to save lives. Muslims will lie to Nazi in order to save Jews. Is that wrong? Whoever says Shriah Law and Taqiyya are wrong.. seriously need his head examined! 88888abdulrahman 2 days ago It was also used to deceive some people so as to kill them. Verdadbuscador in reply to 88888abdulrahman 1 day ago

You are mistaken my friend! That type of 'deceive' is not lying. It is used in a battle/war. A military technical strategy to kill the enemies who want to kill us. 88888abdulrahman in reply to Verdadbuscador 1 day ago From when did the HUNTER become the HUNTED?!!! rationalindian10 in reply to 88888abdulrahman 11 hours ago In a war, who is the hunter and who is the hunted??? Hahaha! what a loser! 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 1 second ago When Muslims get down to defending Islam with their ignorance of it, you know nothing is there to defend. Here, 88888abdulrahman says "How do you know Salman [Rushdie] was actually telling the truth when he said the prophet did receive satanic verses?" The verses are famously at Qur'n 53:19-20, in which Satan is said to have tempted Muhammad into saying "Have ye thought upon Al-Lt and Al-'Uzz and Mant, the third, the other? These are the exalted gharniq, whose intercession is hoped for."... bangfarang 22 minutes ago In reply to the Satanic Verses, I have explained that there is nothing evil about the verses in the Qur'n 53:19-20. It tells about the idol worshiper of Al-Lat, Uzza and Manat, and the pagan Arabs said their gods have male children whilst Allah only has female, which to these pagans is a bad-luck to have female children. They just want to insult Allah. So, I wanted to know who is this Salman Rushdie and what did he wrote in his book the Satanic Verses. To me, it is not the Quran that has the satanic verses, although some liars fabricate stories that Satan whispered his words into the prophet's ear. Unfortunate some of the liars were pagan Arabs who pretended to be Muslims. So, I have just downloaded the Satanic Verses ebook just to confirm what was it all about, as all this time all I know is.... this book insults Islam. I was shocked after reading the Satanic Verses book (for two days). Salman Rushdie is just like the poppadom-head rationalindian10 , is an Indian Lair. This is the reason why I have said in the past, if you see a poisonous snake and an Indian liar, kill the Indian first. Or else he can make you convinced that the snake is a rubber snake. A million copies of the book have been sold and many of those who are willing to defend Rushdie with their lives never actually read the book. British Society of writers, editors paid 800K pound as advance money to Rushdie to publish the book more. Yet they haven't read the book, and all they knew is that the Muslims got angry with the contents of the book. So it is clear that most British are Islam-Haters with no brain whatsoever. They say, "Never-mind what Salman wrote, we British we'll support him with our lives. Only very few British have read the book and later admit it is very difficult to understand. So it wasn't the book that these people are interested in, its about attacking Islam. The proof is here: British MPs want American-Irish actor Mickey Rourke to be banned from

entering Britain for using a 4 letter word (he used it only once) on British Prime Minister's policies. Yet the MPs protect the Rushdie who also uses the same 4 letter words 4 times just in one SV page 270, and 52 times in the whole SV book, plus other vulgar words in other pages, insulting almost everyone and every nation? SELECTIVE SENSITIVITY !!!! In his Satanic Verses book, Rushdie uses the "FUCKING" word on the Americans, Allies and so on. And he got an award for writing the book, a Knighthood and 800K pounds from the British Nation? These british are really CRAZY! When the book first came out, South Africa (which was still under apartheid rule at that time), was the first to ban the book, followed by India. But the British gave Rushdie the knighthood title 'Sir' and pay him 800K pounds and presented with an award for writing the Satanic Verses and called it a brilliant work. This is why I wanted to read the book myself to see why it is considered as a brilliant work by the British, US, France, German and the Western world. This is what I found: Just in the first page of the Satanic Verses book written by Rushdie , he wrote : "Proper London bhai! Here we come! Those bastards down there won't know what hit them" Who are the bastards? THE LONDONERS!! Rushdie uses 16 Hindi words just on the one page, the first page of SV. To be born again, sang Gibreel Farishta tumbling from the heavens, 'first you have to die. Ho ji! Ho ji! To land upon the bosomy earth, first one needs to fly. Tat-taa! Taka-thum! SV pg 80: "Hijras! Chootias ! Shits ! " Rushdie uses dirty vulgar Hindi words on this book and won an award? Rushdie supporters don't even understand what those Hindi words mean and thought they are just Indian spices? SV 80: He insulted the British. "Sister-FUCKING British" SV 169: Has sex with the Queen. "..he found himself dreaming of the Queen, of making tender love to the Monarch. She was the body of Britain, the avatar of the State, and he had chosen her, joined with her; she was his Beloved, the moon of his delight. Defender of Rushdie said 'Join' means in prayer? But following is what Rushdie means by the word join in his same book: S.V 479 "wild donkeys fucking wearily and dropping dead, while still con-joined,.." SV pg 269; Rushdie mocked and called British PM Margaret Thatcher, "Torture. Maggie the Bitch." SV pg 461: "Nigger eat white man's shit." SV pg 449 "Niggerjimmy" and "mushroom." SV pg 529: 'Black shit is bad" So white is good for Rushdie? When the books were by burnt by the Muslims in UK, the British government said these Muslims are like Nazis and racist! Who is clearly racist here? The Muslims

or Rushdie? It wasn't the Muslims who wrote the book and called black people 'Nigger! Strangely, even the blacks in UK and US supported Rushdie. How stupid can these people be? SV 261: white women- never mind fat, Jewish, non-deferential, white women- were for fucking and throwing over. There is a story of a white woman who really hate Islam. One Susan Sontag of the Literary Guild among others read this Satanic Book regularly in public in New York to her doting audiences, both, black and white, young and old. A gang of Afro-American youths imbibed the message. "WHITE WOMEN ARE FOR FUCKING AND THROWING OVER!" For after all, what is reading if not brain-washing. We are what we eat and we are what we read! Susan Sontag, a white woman, relished her reading of "The Satanic Verses." so did her admirers. One young listener was inspired! He was waiting for an opportunity to put Rushdie's idea into action. It didn't take long. Soon afterwards, the same gang of six Afro-American youths were prawling at night in Central Park, New York, looking for adventure. They saw a "WHITE WOMAN" jogging. She triggered their imagination! They went a "W-I-L-D-I-N-G" as the "Times" magazine, of 8th May, 1989, reports. They bashed the poor woman into unconsciousness, and fell on their prey like a pack of wolves. They gang raped her one by one in turn which no wild beast ever does. The blood and the sweat and the gore titillated their libido! That poor jogger was an innocent victim. It should have been Susan Sontag, or Marriane Wiggins (Rusdie's 2nd wife) who says that if she was not Rushdie's wife then she too would have read "The Satanic Verses," to her clientele, in public from city to city. Dr. Vernon Jones, an American psychologist of great repute carried out experiments on groups of school children to whom certain stories were being read, and at the end of his experiments he concluded - "That these stories made certain slight but permanent changes in character, even in the narrow class-room situation." Evil words should not be broadcasted. It entices committing evil. Rushdie is an evil genius supported by those who hate Islam by paying him 800K pounds in advance. But Rushdie did't even spare his supporters. They are also his victims. And they know it ! India government ban the book because Rushdie insulted Hinduism. 539: Here was a leecherous, drunken Rama and a flighty Sita. While Ravana, the demon-king, was depicted as upright and honest man. Gibreel is playing Ravana. Rushdie is telling readers that God is evil and Demon is the good guy. Salman Rushdie is prophet is for those who hate humankind especially those ignorant non-Muslims who hate Islam for no reason ! Bye for now. See ya later.... 88888abdulrahman 1 second ago

Church do pay people like these rationalindian10 and his partner bangfarang because their words are the same as taught by Church about Islam.! They even want to burn Quran! Don't believe me, talk to their priests, None will tell you the truth about Islam. How would you know they are lying? Check Quran, talk to Muslims and compare with what they say! People/ Readers! See how stupid this bangfarang is. Keep on saying Quran is a terror manual but can't produce s single verse to prove his point. I have produced many verses in Bible which says bible is evil and yet he says bible is beautiful . 88888abdulrahman in reply to bangfarang (Show the comment) 5 minutes ago That is because PISSlam is the most dangerous ideology to have ever been created by MANKIND which NOT ONLY is BARBARIC towards NON-MUSLIMS but MURDEROUS and BLOODTHIRSTY even among FELLOW MUSLIMS of RIVAL SECTS!! This filth called ISLAM has NO MATCH among the world religions in BLOODINESS, VENGEFULNESS, LOATHSOMENESS and TERRORISM. UNDERSHTOOD or UNDERSHAT??!! rationalindian10 in reply to 88888abdulrahman 57 minutes ago Cant you bash other religions instead of Islam. Why? Because you are a Islam Hater! Same like the one who make this video. Telling lies about Islam and Quran. 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 50 minutes ago WHY should I BASH OTHER RELIGIONS when the TOPIC of discussion is "Three Things About ISLAM (yes, "I S L A M"...read again "I S L A M")", may i know if you may??!!!! Will YOU be teaching MUSIC in a SWIMMING class??!! rationalindian10 in reply to 88888abdulrahman 1 hour ago Yes I will do that to save time. Whats wrong with singing in swimming pool? My curiosity is that why I have not seen you in other channel with topic Christianity is BS? Yet you act like a smart *** and like to tell lies in this channel about Islam and Quran, insulting the Prophet? All your comments prove you are not smart. The only reason I can think of is you are paid to tell lies about Islam. So I am here to prove to readers you and your lovers are are liars! 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 48 minutes ago Surely in all of human history only Muslims have hoped to add adherents to their way of life by sounding so gallingly stupid. How could they DO that? Because ISLAM is so gallingly stupid and IT defines their ceiling. That ceiling is Muhammads floor. Muhammad established his dominance over other MuslimsAll animals are equal, but one animal is more equal than othersand Muslims coperate in the hierarchy he imposed. Muslims BELIEVE in being low, and put their heads on the floor to make the point Of course, Muslims have to be better than infidels, and Muslim men better than any women, so great lengths are gone to to maintain the hierarchy they were TOLD to maintain. And since assumption, not thought, is Muslims approach to life, they lack the intellectual muscle for persuasion. So as ingehs said, Only bullet discussion is the answer here. Islampage added These guys [four YouTube infidels] are wanted and must be put to death as soon as possible. Ignorance is bound to get dangerous. bangfarang in reply to bangfarang (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

Hahah your comment sound like you are having a mental breakdown. Where is the proof for all these accusation? I am sure readers are not stupid like you and your partner the Indian guy! If I say you mother is a *****, does it mean readers will believe me? If you say yes, then that explain everything why you tell lies about Islam and the prophet. 88888abdulrahman in reply to bangfarang (Show the comment) 1 hour ago I though the Title of this video is "Three Things About Islam" and NOT "Three Things About Christianity" or "Three Things About Judaism"!!! Can't you EVER DEFEND YOUR RELIGION on it's OWN MERIT without DRAGGING in OTHERS??!! Afterall, I have NEVER SEEN anyone dragging in PISSlam on "CHRISTIANITY BASHING VIDEOS" or "JUDAISM BASHING VIDEOS"!!! Looks like PISSlam can NEVER STAND ON IT'S OWN LEGS and instead TRIES (it's level best) by STANDING ON BORROWED LEGS!!! rationalindian10 in reply to 88888abdulrahman 1 hour ago I see that 88888abdulrahman, in an apparent competition to fit as many lies as possible into one fifteen-word sentence, has written "This rationalindian10 and his gay partner bangfarang are nothing but scumbags paid by the Church!" Then he whimpers that his prophet has been insulted. Guy, your Qur'n IS a terror manual. Did your mother never tell you that you'd hear that someday? If you were more dedicated to discovering than to being told, you wouldn't need to have learned it from infidels. bangfarang in reply to 88888abdulrahman (Show the comment) 2 hours ago

Dangerous ideology? Hahahha.. which version of Islam did you read? I thought there is only one version.You must be confused with Christianisty Ideology which teaches: God punishes children for the sins of their fathers, unto the third and fourth generations. Punishing a child for the sins of their ancestors is not very just. Exodus 20:5&34:7 God endorses slavery. He even set up laws as to how slavery was to be carried out, and goes as far as Okaying beating them. Exodus 21:2-6 Genesis 38:10 God murders Onan for refusing to commit incest with his sister in law. 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 50 minutes ago

BEEP BEEP BEEP **** @#$^#@&## !!!!! (censored- insult remarks against the Prophet pbuh ) rationalindian10 in reply to 88888abdulrahman

See what I mean readers !!! This poppadom-head has lost his Holy Ghost! He started cursing and his horns and tail already came out !!! HAHAHHAA.. 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 1 hour ago

Al-Lt, Al-'Uzz, and Mant were goddesses worshipped by the Meccans. In sum, Muhammad was torn between his Islam and his sensuality. Abdul also addresses SuperBoqor's "Salman Rushdie is under threat because he wrote a book called Satanic verses" by responding "Salman Rushdie is under threat because he attacked Islam." To him, that's evidently different AND a sufficient cause for him to be threatened with death-by-fatw. Maybe we could hear from a Muslim or two who oppose that fatw. Anyone? bangfarang in reply to bangfarang 5 hours ago

With regard to the verses in Chapter An-Najm [Quran 53], it is a response to what some polytheists used to believe in, that the idols and angels are daughters of Allah, but if a man amongst them was given glad tiding of a female, he would hate that, so Allah denied them from attributing to Allah what they hated to attribute to themselves, and clarified that this is unjust. Furthermore, the Prophet did not approve of the Quraysh about their worship of the idols, and he never approved this of them, rather, it is known from them that they spread about him that he insulted their gods. However, if you refer to the story of Gharaaneeq plural of Gharnooq which is a beautiful white long-necked bird known in English as a crane then this story is false and unfounded. 88888abdulrahman in reply to bangfarang 6 minutes ago

YOU SEE... THE WHOLE DAY WE ARGUE.. NOT EVEN A PERSON.. NOT EVEN YOUR LIAR FATHER @BANGFARANG COME TO YOUR RESQUE... BECAUSE THEY ALL KNOW, YOU AND THEM ARE LYING...GO TO "MUSLIM TELLS THE TRUTH ABOUT ISLAM" AND SEE FOR YOURSELF HOW I CRUSHED @BANGFARANG AND OTHER LIARS ON THE SAME SUBJECT. YOU ARE STARTING TO CRACK UP.. BREAKING DOWN FOR BEING SO STUBBORN TO DEFEND YOUR OWN LIES.. I PITY YOU AND I LET YOU GO THIS TIME.. YOU WILL NOT BE THIS LUCKY NEXT TIME.. SO WATCH OUT WHAT YOU POST.. PEACE. TheAbahaziz in reply to rationalindian10 (Show the comment) 13 hours ago Everyone is NOT a JOBLESS FREAK like YOU and ME!! And in a short while, even i need to pack off. rationalindian10 in reply to TheAbahaziz 13 hours ago

HAHAHA.. THE WORLD HAS DIFFERENT TIME. IN AMERICA IT IS NIGHT, EUROPE IS MORNING, ASIA IS AFTERNOON. STUPID!! HOW CAN PEOPLE WORK AT THE SAME TIME ALL OVER THE WORLD. AGAIN YOUR COMMENT SHOWS YOUR STUPIDITY !!! 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 13 hours ago

Just answer a simple question on which is MORE: 1. What percentage of orthodox muslims (alteast from what YOU have seen) follow the QURANIC 3-time prayers??!! 2. What percentage of orthodox muslims follow the HADITHIC 5-time prayers??!! rationalindian10 in reply to ShuffleWarz (Show the comment) 13 hours ago How many Christians type are there: Roman Catholic 1,050,000,000 Orthodox/Eastern Christian 240,000,000 African indigenous sects 110,000,000 Pentecostal 105,000,000 Congregational/United 75,000,000 Anglican 73,000,000 Baptist 70,000,000 Methodist 70,000,000 Lutheran 64,000,000 Jehovah's Witnesses 14,800,000 Adventist 12,000,000 Latter Day Saints 12,500,000 New Apostolic 10,000,000 "Restoration Movement" 5,400,000 New Thought 1,500,000 Brethren 1,500,000 Mennonite 1,250,000 Quakers 300,000 And you worried about the Shia and Sunni? 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 13 hours ago "LET ME TELL YOU... IF YOU ARE EDUCATED ENOUGH .. YOU MUST AWARE THAT EVEN A WELL ORGANIZED WIKIPEDIA IS NOT ACCEPTED BY MOST SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES FOR ITS BIAS REPORT." WIKIPEDIA is more RELIABLE than your BULLSHIT "MAN-MADE" QURAN and the HADITHS!! rationalindian10 in reply to TheAbahaziz 14 hours ago You have not even given a single verse from Quran as a proof it is BS. So clearly the one who is bullshitting is You !!! 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 14 hours ago I am willing to give this Indian poppadom-head 10k if this he can show me in Quran to kill APOSTASY. He can't! Because he is born to be a liar. 88888abdulrahman in reply to TheAbahaziz 14 hours ago Is 5 time prayer atleast COMPULSORY or NOT??!! And what about those KISSING THE FLOOR, LIFTING THE BUMS and RUBBING THE FACE prayer techniques??!! Are they also defined in the Quran??!! rationalindian10 in reply to ShuffleWarz 14 hours ago How do you teach a person to dance? Through a book? You need to demonstrate it live. Thus our Prophet has demonstrated to his friends and down to their children and down to us... The reference is in the hadith not the QUran because it is not words, it is an action which the angel taught the Prophet. 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 14 hours ago

What happened to those CONFIRMED VERSES in the QURAN which describe the normal 5 prayers and 6-time prayers during RAMADAN??!! Also, where are the VERSES in the Quran which describe the KISSING THE FLOOR, LIFTING THE BUM, RUBBING THE FACE, etc prayer techniques??!! If you could give me the exact verse numbers that you have CONFIRMED, it would be REALLY HELPFUL. Thank you. rationalindian10 in reply to ShuffleWarz 14 hours ago I just rang my Muslim friend on the phone to ask him your question because his dad was a Imam (leader) in the mosque. He informed me that 6 times a day prayer during Ramadan is only OPTIONAL and it is not 'farz' (compulsory rules mentioned in the Koran). So basically any rule from outside of the Koran written in Hadiths are known as 'Sunnah" and are not compulsory because the Koran ALWAYS takes precedence over any Hadith. So any Muslim can practice Islam SUCCESSFULLY from the Koran ALONE. ShuffleWarz in reply to rationalindian10 14 hours ago These are the 6 prayers during Ramadan: Fajr (4:55 AM), Sunrise (6:13 AM), Dhuhr (12:43 PM), Asr (4:09 PM), Maghrib (7:21 PM) and Isha (8:32 PM)!! Please guide me to those verses in the QURAN which describe the above!! rationalindian10 in reply to StarvinMarvinn1 (Show the comment) 14 hours ago HAHAHHA.. six prayers?? We are talking about the compulsory prayer which is 5. I can pray a hundred times in a day with those that we called sunnah prayers which are not compulsory!! The only words I can say to you is you acted like you know Islam, but you only proof you re a fool. Even your Christian brother believes you a re a fool in his posting. Hahahhahahhhah... 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 14 hours ago show me a SINGLE VERSE in the QURAN which stipulates the 5-time prayer. rationalindian10 in reply to ShuffleWarz 14 hours ago 1) Salaat al-Fajr [24:58] 2) Salaat al-Wusta The Middle Prayer [2:238] 3) Salaat al-Maghrib [Soorah al-Israa, 17:78] 4) Salaat al-Asr: [Soorah Younus, 11:114] 5) Salaat Al-Ishaa [24:58] Single verse? You can't even read the whole Quran and count? Thats the beauty of Islam, Quran wants us to use our brain. 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 14 hours ago Sura 33:21: "Indeed in the Messenger of Allah (Muhammad SAW) you have a PERFECT EXAMPLE TO FOLLOW for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allah and the Last Day and remembers Allah much"!! How do the muslims know WHAT MUHAMMAD DID if not for the HADITHS (where Muhammad declares that APOSTATES NEED TO BE PUT TO SWORD)??!! rationalindian10 in reply to ShuffleWarz 15 hours ago

How do the muslims know WHAT MUHAMMAD DID if not for the HADITHS? We always refer hadith to Quran as we only follow what God has told the prophet to do. Not everything the prophet do we have to do! Why should we use camel just because the prophet use camel for traveling and fight with sword not gun? APOSTATES should be killed? Where in Quran? I'll give anyone who can show me in Quran to kill APOSTATES 10 thousand dollars ! 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 14 hours ago When your knowledge of PISSlam itself is PATHETIC to say the LEAST, it would be better if you can follow PINDROP-SILENCE on OTHER RELIGIONS which you don't have an inkling of!! Afterall, SILENCE is GOLDEN!! rationalindian10 in reply to 88888abdulrahman 15 hours ago You are the future bride of Satan! As I cannot get Satan, at least I got his Indian lover ! 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 15 hours ago for Allah says to "KILL THOSE who BELIEVE in MANY GODS" (Sura al-Tawba 9:5), WITHOUT fixing a DEADLINE. The Prophet also said, "KILL HIM WHO CHANGES HIS RELIGION," without mentioning a delay, because the APOSTATE is surely a HOSTILE UNBELIEVER and NO ASYLUM SEEKER (musta'min) who has asked for protection; furthermore, he is NO DHIMMI (a non-Muslim under Islamic rule), for no poll tax is demanded of him. Therefore, he SHOULD BE KILLED WITHOUT RESERVATION"!!! rationalindian10 in reply to rationalindian10 15 hours ago This is common among Islam bashers just quoting verse 5. If you bother to read the whole verse from 1-5, it tells you about a treaty with the polytheists during a war with them. There is time limit period for the treaty . At the end of the treaty, the war can start again unless the polythesis (who fought in the war, and not any polytheisi as told by liars) repent, establish prayer, and give zakah. Quran tells Muslims to let them go on their way. 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 15 hours ago Why DON'T you teach the whole Sura of 9 from 1-5 to the HANIFIS who are one of the 4 MAIN SUNNI-ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCES and correct THEIR UNDERSTANDING which is REVERED in the SUNNI-MUSLIM WORLD instead of correcting ME which is of NO SIGNIFICANCE whatsoever??!!! rationalindian10 in reply to 88888abdulrahman 15 hours ago Why should I teach them? They all understand it. Its you who have been twisting their words! You are even telling lies about Hanifis !! Oh.. when is your lies going to end. Oh yes how many APOSTATES were killed by Muslims? I know millions were killed by Christians. Just read the History ! 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 15 hours ago ALL I AM ASKING YOU IS TO SHOW SOME DOCUMENTED PROOF THAT MUSLIMS WERE KILLED FOR APOSTASY TheAbahaziz in reply to rationalindian10 16 hours ago

Just search for "YOUCEF NADARKHANI" to start with. rationalindian10 in reply to TheAbahaziz 17 hours ago SIX MILLION A YEAR... IN AFRICA... AND 1 PERSON FROM IRAN...??? WHAT YEAR WAS THAT.... 5, 6 YEARS AGO.... 6 MILLION X 5 YEARS = 30 MILLION IN AFRICA... AND ALL YOU CAN COLLECT IS ONE PERSON FROM IRAN...??? PS. I WILL TALK LATER ABOUT WHY THIS YOUCEF WAS ARRESTED AND ON WHAT CHARGE. HE HIMSELF CLAIM THAT HE WAS NEVER BEEN A MUSLIM. TheAbahaziz in reply to rationalindian10 17 hours ago That is just the tip of the iceberg you moron!!! You cannot be expecting me to paste the whole list of apostates killed both PUBLICLY as well as COVERTLY and even in ERAS when TV or MEDIA did NOT exist, do you?!!! ISLAMIC LAW is pretty fuckin damn CRYSTAL CLEAR: Kill the APOSTATES!! PERIOD. What else DO YOU WANT??!! Even if we assume that muslims have NOT KILLED APOSTATES, they are only going AGAINST the teachings of ISLAM and NOT TOWARDS IT!! That only makes them MUNAFIQS and NOT MUSLIMS!! Lemme put it this way: If APOSTATES were NOT KILLED, then the muslims around them are NOT MUSLIMS anymore because they are going directly AGAINST their ISLAMIC TEACHINGS and should be declared APOSTATES themselves and BEHEADED by the TRUE MUSLIMS. rationalindian10 in reply to TheAbahaziz 16 hours ago wow just one person! How many Muslims in Burma and in Serbia killed in a single day because they refused to accept Buddhism and Christianity? So which is worst, to kill a traitor or to kill those who don't want to follow your religion? 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 17 hours ago Lemme put it this way: If APOSTATES were NOT KILLED, then the muslims around them are NOT MUSLIMS anymore because they are going directly AGAINST their ISLAMIC TEACHINGS and should be declared APOSTATES themselves and BEHEADED by the TRUE MUSLIMS. rationalindian10 in reply to TheAbahaziz 16 hours ago If the Christians do not kill all the non believers are they not Christians? Bible says to kill all unbelievers! If in Hinduism burn the widow of the dead man as well, and they are not Hindus if they refused? Wow !!! What a stupid remark. You are getting worst and worst in your way of thinking !!! 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 15 hours ago If I tell you, go to the kitchen and get me water, and kill anyone that tries to stop you on the way. Then YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO KILL ANYONE ON YOUR WAY THAT DOESNT STOP YOU FROM GETTING THAT WATER! AzizEida93 in reply to rationalindian10 (Show the comment) 17 hours ago

What if another thirsty person is also going to fetch the ONLY GLASS OF WATER available in the kitchen??!! rationalindian10 in reply to AzizEida93 17 hours ago WE SHARE THE WATER !!! 88888abdulrahman in reply to rationalindian10 17 hours ago Believe me. I don't believe in Islam at all. I don't believe in any religion. If Islam was a true religion, the people who criticize it would be welcomed to debate and not hide for the rest of their lives. Salman Rushdie is under threat because he wrote a book called Satanic verses. And he was actually telling the truth the prophet did receive satanic verses go ask any sheikh. I can post Hadiths that have not been fabricated. And verses. SuperBoqor in reply to AzizEida93 19 hours ago You guys are hiding behind lies. Salman Rushdie is under threat because he attacked Islam. So which verses are Satanic verses? How do you know Salman was actually telling the truth when he said the prophet did receive satanic verses? The reason you support that idiot Rushdie is because you hate Islam. You never read Quran, just a bit here and there, You act as you know everything! Like bible, most hadith (not all) as you and me know have been fabricated. Thats the reason its pointless to talk about hadith. 88888abdulrahman in reply to SuperBoqor 18 hours ago The Kaaba was never a Holy site. Mohammad used it as his place of worship because it made converting the polytheists easier because it was THEIR site. The Kaaba was never actually of any significance. There were actually multiple kaabas (stone worship) in saudi!! ainu waka in reply to 88888abdulrahman 46 minutes ago I will follow what religion you have if you can give me a solid proof to support your claim that the Kaaba was never a Holy site. Any Scientific or archeological proof? Just because there are many stone worshiped in saudi is not a proof. I can also say Jesus is only a myth in your bible. 88888abdulrahman in reply to ainu waka 3 minutes ago you are an absolute embarrassment to your country. There is nothing professional about your arguments. All you do is hurl insults like a child. Your reasoning that you do this because your 'enemies' do it is just pathetic. It shows you can never pull an intellectual argument. I dare you to make a video, featuring yourself talking about Islam. And i mean YOU talking. NO TEXT. Lets see how well YOU respond ainu waka in reply to 88888abdulrahman 2 minutes ago

I am amaze you very polite not like those who use vulgar words on our prophet. I hope you keep it that way. As you can see, in all my posting, have I ever use bad words to those who are polite, like what you are now? The reason I insulted those people so that they'll stop insulting and swearing, and to do this debate professionally. Obviously you only read my swearing but not the logical answers I gave to the questions asked. Recheck again my posting. You want to see my face? Skype with me ! 88888abdulrahman in reply to ainu waka 1 second ago The Islamic world depend on the innovations and successes of the unbelievers. They are mentally and creatively bankrupt and contribute nothing. Rosstaman100 in reply to FeistyForJustice Well, I wonder what will happen if Islamic world stop sending fuel to the unbelievers countries? Nepal, and most poor countries in this planet are not Muslims are they. How come they are worst than all Muslim countries? Put it this way, we have the money and we just pay the unbelievers to develop our country and supply us with weapons ! Like slaves.. 88888abdulrahman in reply to Rosstaman100 16 minutes ago One average Jewish man is 10X the man physically, intellectually, and in character than the best of Muslims. Jews, only .02% of the world's population has won over 25X the Nobel Prizes of Muslims, who are 23% of the world's population. Just a few million Jews on a tiny strip of land have defended themselves successfully against the hordes of Muslim armies who outnumber them outragiously. Even Israeli Jewesses fight off Muslim soldiers. It will always be this way. Muslims cannot beat Jews. Rosstaman100 in reply to FeistyForJustice 14 minutes ago Oh my God! You are not that bright are you? All these times you thought Muslim is a race like the Jews? Poor guy! Do you know that hundreds of Jews in Israel convert to Islam each year? There are German Muslims and any type of race in this planet can be Muslims. Google and see the YouTube. 88888abdulrahman in reply to Rosstaman100 4 minutes ago Just a reminder, Stupid: American geologists discovered your fuel while looking for aquifirs/water for the ignorant beduin leaders, and to this day (through ARAMCO mostly), bring it out of the ground. Arabs did absolutely nothing, zero, in the finding or production of the oil that was found under their ground. That is NO achievement. It is a shame that wet shale had been atop the land for centuries with no Arab knowing what it meant, what it was. You stupid fucks. Thank the infidel...again. Rosstaman100 in reply to 88888abdulrahman 3 minutes ago

Oh now you are tying to be smart. Yes, American has to do all the dirty work whilst the rich Arab do nothing. Hey, wait a minute! That what we called slavery ! 88888abdulrahman in reply to Rosstaman100 45 seconds ago

A MUSLIM LADY CONDAMNS ME

I received a comment in one of my posting from a person by the name of Nabilah who claimed to be a Muslim lady. She criticized me for using foul words in my comments in YouTube and condemned me by saying that I am a disgrace to the Muslims. I find it really odd. Why am I a disgrace to Islam if I use foul words in order to stop Islam Haters from cursing/swearing at our beloved prophet s.a.w. and Allah the Almighty? I tried to be nice to them but it didn't work. So, I have no choice but to use foul words against them and it works!!! Yet Nabilah never condemns Muslims who kill the innocent Christians and Jews, like those Moslem terrorists, Moslem rapists, adulterers, drunkards, those ladies who don't even cover their head like Nabilah herself as in her profile, and so on.. as being a disgrace to Islam!! Attacking Islam Haters with foul words really works because Islam Haters have stopped posting insulting comments in the YouTube!! I couldn't care less what people think about me !! This is not about me!! In her last comment, Nabilah even criticized my English. I wonder how can a person use good English when using foul words? That was really a stupid comment! The Scottish are even worst than me. Sometimes I could not even understand them. May be Nabilah is an English professor from Oxford who thought she is the smartest person on this planet! It does not matter if my English is bad, its not an essay exam or competition. Readers can still understand me...just like that SMS text!

I THEN received a reply from Nabillah who is still not happy with me for using foul wards. Well, here was my response to her: Nabillah, you still don't get it. This is just like the story of Prophet Musa(Moses) a.s when he met a wise old man and he wanted to learn from him, but instead the prophet accused the old man of being evil for killing an innocent child. You don't even know that I am using foul words only against people who are not interested to have debate. Some are paid to post anti-islamic comments in all religious channels. If you read all my comments in the YouTube you will surely find some of my professional debates with decent Atheists and Christians. If these people thought I am not worth to be entertained, why would they invite me to a private chat. Some of them were Christian priests and we addressed each other as 'brother'. An Atheist from Australia even thank me for opening his eyes. A Malaysian youth has reverted back to Islam. These people understood why I use foul words thus they prefer to have a private debate with me in inbox. They knew I had to use foul words to stop people posting insulting comments and they did not blame me.

You mentioned that you went to a university in the States, and telling me the amount of prejudice you suffered, and that you could've lashed back at them, but you didn't. Because you said you believe that even if you got them to shut up they would still harbour feelings of disgust and anger towards Muslims. In fact, speaking out would have just made them even more prejudiced towards Muslims. To me you are considered to be very lucky. Some who didn't fight like a friend of mine ended up in hospital. Let me share you a story of me when I was studying in UK. Two English thugs were insulting me whilst I was walking past a pub. They tried to attack me. This was in public. No one came to assist me as most were just watching(I remember most were Whites). The next thing I knew... both thugs were lying on the ground motionless. When I yelled.. "who's next!!", every one clapped their hands and some even tapping my shoulder... I felt disgusted with them! You wrote that "If they slander Muhammad (pbuh) or Allah or do something really unacceptable, give a gentle rebuke or just leave them be." The Quran is clear in its instruction to treat the People of the Book in the nicest possible manner Do not argue with the People of the Book except in the nicest possible manner, except those of them who are oppressive... (Quran 29:46). "..those of them who are oppressive..? The answer is obvious to anyone who has common sense. If they are oppressive by verbal (or written) assault and false accusations, would you still be nice to them and just leave them? Well, that would be contradicting with the Quran 29:46 verse. Ramadhan Mubarak to you too

A REPLY From Nabillah: "I am well aware of the fact that I was lucky and I thank God for watching over me. I am sorry about your friend. But you are implying that he/she was beaten up because he/she didn't fight back. Do you honestly think that fighting back would have helped me or your friend any? To respond in such a way is to provoke a response. If met with resistance, I think these people just be more eager to teach you a lesson. If my bullies were as hostile as they were towards me even without me fighting back, then fighting would almost certainly have incited a more violent response. And it's very nice that you managed to fend off those thugs, but not everybody is as strong as you are. And if you ask me, i'd say you were extremely fortunate as well, my friend. More often than not, people who fight back get beaten up. If your assailants had been armed, or if there had been more than a couple of them... you might not be whistling the same tune. But anyway, fighting back physically and with words are two different things, so let's not confuse the two." Well, I want to ask Nabillah a simple question; IF NABILLAH IS RAPED BY A WEAK OLDMAN, SHE WOULD NOT FIGHT HIM BACK, FEARING HE MIGHT BE ARMED? WHAT WOULD SHE SAY TO THE RAPIST? "HELP YOUR SELF BRO, WE MUSLIMS ARE PEACE LOVING PEOPLE AND I DON'T WANT TO PROVOKE YOU!"

There will surely be a long queue of old-men including the priests waiting to get their turn on Nabillah! Either I lose the fight or not, doesn't really matter. If I lost the fight they will attack me, if I ignore them they will still attack me. So, I might as well fight, at least I still have a chance to survive! In the following verse of Al Quran, it didn't mention fighting back physically or with word as there is no difference between the two. So there is nothing to be confused of! Quran 9:73 O Prophet, fight against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be harsh upon them. And their refuge is Hell, and wretched is the destination.