Utopia

called International Unity.

Whatever we face in life or happens to us in life.

First thing that we must look into is, we must be clear as to what we want to do about the thing and why at all we need to do something about it. - Balayogi

Then decide whether are we going to improve it, change it, remove it, avoid it, accept it as it is, propagate it, make it an integral part of our life, part of society, part of human species alone or part of the whole living system etc and whether it is feasible to do any of these

Then how to go about it. Once we are clear about what we want to do. Then we must look into the facts because they are the first things we have to deal with, next what are the factors that sustain and support those facts, after these we must find out

whether are they necessary or can we do away with some of them or all of them based on whether the factors are intrinsically connected with the facts or are they mere appendages or in fact are they parasites.

Nextwemustremember,andifweobserveanyscience closelywithoutanypreconceivedideaswewould realizethatallfactsandfactorsarenotcreated, everythingevolvesaspertherequirementofcertain situationalorcontextualdemands.Everythinginaway istheresultofspecificsituationsorcontextsorthey createnewsituationsorcontexts.So,mostofthe things,orprobablyallthethings,arebornoutof evolution,beitinbiology,technology,psychology, politicalideologyetc.YoumayseemanytopicsthatI writeonthisthemeinmyfacebook grouppage http://www.facebook.com/groups/156104494514222/ calledSituationaland/orContextual

Everything is always lurking somewhere waiting for the appropriate time to appear to perform a particular role in a specific manner.

Nothing is creation. Everything in a way is evolution. Evolution effecting a change or improvement or slight modification or manifesting hitherto unexpected and unheard of manifestations leading to all these changes.

Unfortunately, or rather I would call it fortunately, all these aspects of evolution may not be always perceived the moment or even as soon as they evolve, because every single aspect of evolution is meant to tackle the requirements or necessities thrown up by the new and emerging situation or context and it emerges because the existing storehouse of our knowledge has been inadequate to address or tackle the new situation.

Unfortunately knowledge by itself is always limited. To understand this better, you need to read J.Krishnamurthys speeches on knowledge

To know how fallible our perception is? Read this article http://contentwriteups.blogspot .in/2010/02/real-perception.html

However we have only these two tools [knowledge and perception-with all their concomitant aspects like thoughts, memory, intelligence, logic, reason etc] to decipher and deal with most of the affairs of life.

This preamble was necessary because the very deeply concerned question that you have come up with but we should try to stop these things.what do you think about my solution unification of countries? Is it good

Only a heartless person would say it is not good to think of unification of countries. But then, if you have followed the above points 3,4 &5 then there must have been many factors which have contributed to or caused the fact called nationhood. Though on the surface, it may look like merely a real estate division of the this planet called earth.

It was just a planet which fortunately was habitable for many species and in that the human species too evolved. This is perhaps because this planet required for its evolution, in addition to creatures with only different physical features and functions, also creatures with additional and advanced features called mind, consciousness, intelligence, thought, memory etc

These creatures, human beings, in their evolutionary wisdom or sometimes the lack of it have created many things because they could, and also because they wanted to identify everything and everyone, so they resorted to names and different forms of identity culminating in biometric finger print access.

Starting from the invention of mirror to the evolution of words were initially the result of human beings urge for identity and identification. Then from identity it developed or evolved into classifying based on this identity.

Certain common features, factors and functions led to social cohesion of individuals with similar identities as a matter of species protection, pleasure, comfort, security etc.

Then there emerged the need to establish exclusive territorial rights to protect against the assumed sense of insecurity or to ensure security or promote the collective and common interests of one group of specific identity against another group of different identity.

So tossing up our wonderful wishes, impeccable ideas, unworkable utopias, terrific thoughts etc are not going to that easily reverse the present status or state of affairs.

We talk so much about our species which is such a late entrant into the space occupied by many other species. Why should our thinking be only human centric? Why cannot it be life centric? Life consists of not only the visible creatures, but even those invisible, in fact very often they seem to play a big role in life. What are we doing to those fences that we have created with other species for our own welfare and selfish interests? [I mean the interests of human beings alone.] http://contentwriteups.blogspot.in/2011/11/humandifferent-animal.html

There is nothing inherently wrong with identity or classifications based on those identities per se , nor even is there anything inherently wrong with recognition of differences because that [existence of differences] is a fact. Human brain cannot afford to avoid facts.

Facts are Gods way of instigating us to approach truth. Our acceptance and acknowledgment of facts is the sign of our integrity. So let us never wish away facts, however uncomfortable or unpleasant they are.[refer point number 2 above] [http://contentwriteups.blogspot.in/ 2011/12/whole.html]

Rather than viewing anything as wrong and unwanted, especially after realizing the fact that we have not even remotely contributed or contributing to certain things that

exist and also the fact they there is nothing inherently wrong in them we can understand that they cause certain discomforts for everyone.

We need to understand what those discomforts are and address them. Here the discomfort is not the existence of differences nor the conscious acknowledgement of them but the divisions that are created in the name of differences. Once we understand this then we can do something to either remove it or at least make humanity to sail with the knowledge of all the differences or if we have the luck of having our wishes turning into reality we can wish that they seamlessly merge in unison.

Variety is not only the spice but the inevitable fact of nature and life and it is there, to be appreciated and enjoyed and not to be misunderstood or manipulated " God is UNITY but always works in VARIETY" -RALPH W.EMERSON [http://contentwriteups.blogspot.in/2011/12/gat her-knowledge-from-as-many-sources.html]

Unfortunately the western collective psychology has contributed to sabotage, suppress and subjugate variety through homogenization. It is not just any biased generalization or wild allegation I would like you to read these two links and let me know http://contentwriteups.blogspot.in /2009/10/peace-and-non-violenceharmony-and.html and http://contentwriteups.blogspot.in /2010/11/west-needs-to-changeits-obsession-to.html

Unless constantly repeated or brainwashed or specifically tutored by nature we are not good at remembering differences thats why you have tests like this http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody /sleep/tmt/instructions_1.shtml

Nationhood reminds me of an excellent verse because the birth of nations has meaninglessly separated all of us-human beings a single speciesthe children of Mother Earth. This is the verse Brief reflection on a Fence- by Miroslav Holub [ translated from Czech to English by Ewald Osers]

A fence
begins nowhere ends nowhere and separates the place where it is from the place where it isnt. unfortunately, however, every fence is relatively permeable, some for small others for large things so that the fence actually does not separate but indicates that something should be separated.

And the trespassers will be prosecuted. In this sense the fence can perfectly well be replaced with an angry word, or sometimes even a kind word, but that as a rule does not occur to anyone.

In this sense therefore a truly perfect fence is one that separates nothing from nothing, a place where there is nothing, from a place where theres also nothing. That is the absolute fence, similar to the poets word. Link http://contentwriteups.blogspot.in/2010/12/pongal-virginal-universal-festival-of.html