Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
chaseacopyof
ONAFARTHERSHORE
atoneoft
heser
etai
l
ers:
Copyright © 2012 by William Souder
All rights reserved.
Published in the United States by Broadway Books, an imprint of the
Crown Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc., New York.
www.crownpublishing.com
Broadway Books and its logo, B\D\W\Y, are trademarks of Random House, Inc.
Originally published in hardcover in the United States by Crown Publishers, an imprint
of the Crown Publishing Group, a Division of Random House, Inc., New York, in 2012.
Grateful acknowledgment is made to the following for permission to reprint
previously published (and unpublished) material:
Francis Collin, Literary Agent, for permission to reprint excerpts from the following
books by Rachel Carson: Under the Sea-Wind, copyright © 1941 by Rachel L. Carson
(New York: Simon & Schuster, 1941); The Sea Around Us, copyright © 1950 by Rachel L.
Carson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1950); The Edge of the Sea, copyright © 1955
by Rachel L. Carson (Boston: Houghton Miffl in Co., 1955); Silent Spring, copyright ©
1962 by Rachel L. Carson (Boston: Houghton Miffl in Co., 1962); Always, Rachel edited
by Martha Freeman, copyright © 1995 by Roger Allen Christie (Boston: Beacon Press,
1995); Lost Woods edited by Linda Lear, copyright © 1998 by Roger Allen Christie
(Boston: Beacon Press, 1998); and unpublished Rachel Carson material copyright © 2012
by Roger A. Christie. Reprinted by permission of Frances Collin, Trustee.
Houghton Miffl in Harcourt Publishing Company and Faber & Faber Limited: Excerpt
from “The Dry Salvages” from Four Quartets by T. S. Eliot. Copyright © 1941 by T. S.
Eliot, copyright renewed 1969 by Esme Valerie Eliot. Reprinted by permission of
Houghton Miffl in Harcourt Publishing Company and Faber & Faber Limited.
Stanley Freeman Jr. and Martha Freeman: Excerpts from Dorothy Freeman’s letters and
other writings. Reprinted by permission.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Souder, William
On a farther shore : the life and legacy of Rachel Carson /
William Souder.—1st ed.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. Carson, Rachel, 1907–1964. 2. Carson, Rachel, 1907–1964. Silent Spring. 3. Carson,
Rachel, 1907–1964—Influence. 4. Marine biologists—United States—
Biography. 5. Naturalists—United States—Biography. 6. Environmentalists—United
States—Biography. 7. Science writers—United States—Biography. 8. Pesticides—
Environmental aspects—United States—History. 9. Environmentalism—United States—
History. 10. Environmental ethics—United States—History. I. Title.
QH31.C33S68 2012
508.092—dc23
[B] 2012003077
ISBN 978-0-307-46221-3
eISBN 978-0-307-46222-0
Printed in the United States of America
Book design by Maria Elias
Frontispiece photograph: Rachel Carson, 1951, by Irving Penn.
Copyright © 1951 (renewed 1979) Condé Nast Publications Inc.
Cover design by Janet Hansen
Cover photograph: Alfred Eisenstaedt/Time Life Pictures/Getty Images
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
First Paperback Edition
L
ate in the summer of 1962, extreme weather visited both ends
of the United States. In the West it was so hot that women
wore swimsuits on the streets of San Francisco, and the smog
levels in that city were the highest ever recorded. On the East Coast,
Hurricane Alma churned northward, interrupting a pleasant spell as
it neared the tip of Long Island. On August 28 the edge of the storm
ended play at Yankee Stadium one inning after Mickey Mantle blasted
what proved to be the game-winning home run to right centerfield
through a driving rain. The next morning it was sunny and warm in
the nation’s capital, where the Washington Post’s weather section re-
ported daily radiation levels of just three micromicrocuries per cubic
meter of air—unchanged from the day before and not bad given the
recent pace of atmospheric nuclear weapons tests by both the United
States and the Soviet Union.
That same day, President John F. Kennedy appeared at the State
Department at four in the afternoon for the forty-second press con-
ference of his year and a half in office. The president began by an-
nouncing Felix Frankfurter’s retirement from the U.S. Supreme
Carson was the bestselling author of three books about the oceans and
by any measure one of America’s most respected and beloved writ-
ers. Or so she had been. The new book to which Kennedy referred,
Silent Spring, was a bristling polemic about the indiscriminate use of
pesticides. It was unlike anything Carson had previously written. Al-
though not yet actually a book—it wouldn’t be published for another
month—in June three long excerpts from Silent Spring had appeared
in consecutive issues of the New Yorker. By the time of Kennedy’s
press conference, the New Yorker articles had raised public alarm in
the United States and abroad and prompted the chemicals industry
to launch an angry and concerted effort to discredit Silent Spring and
destroy its author.
The woman at the center of this firestorm scarcely seemed ca-
pable of becoming such a polarizing figure. Now fifty-five years old,
Rachel Carson had spent most of her adult life in the company of her
mother—writing, bird-watching, and visiting the seashore. Petite,
soft-spoken, and nearly apolitical, she lived quietly in a leafy suburb
of Silver Spring, Maryland, with a cat and her orphaned ten-year-old
grandnephew, Roger Christie, whom she had adopted. Carson had
earned a master’s degree in zoology at Johns Hopkins University but
had never worked as a scientist. In the gloom of the Great Depression,
she instead found a job as an information specialist with the federal
government’s Bureau of Fisheries, an agency later merged with the
Biological Survey to form the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
In 1951 her book The Sea Around Us made Carson’s literary repu-
tation—it stood atop the New York Times bestseller list for thirty-nine
weeks and won the National Book Award—and she left government
service. Every spring Carson and Roger drove north to Southport
Island on the Maine coast, where she owned a cottage on a rocky
bluff overlooking Sheepscot Bay. Here Carson passed her summers
in reflection, gazing at the ebb and flow of the sea, collecting marine
specimens in the tidal pools along the shore, and visiting, often deep
into the fog-shrouded nights, with her neighbors Dorothy and Stan-
ley Freeman. In the fall, she went home.
On June 5, 1945, an FWS airplane flew back and forth just above
the treetops of a 117-acre tract of forest in the sprawling Patuxent
Research Refuge in Prince George’s County, Maryland, not far from
Washington, D.C. The plane sprayed the woods with DDT dissolved
in xylene and fuel oil. The mixture drifted down through the forest
canopy unevenly, riding updrafts and crosswinds, and arrived on the
ground in varying concentrations as the pilot, navigating by sight,
passed over some areas more than once and missed other places en-
tirely. Some of the toxic cloud landed on a nearly mile-long section of
the Patuxent River, a small, muddy stream that was home to twenty
species of fish.
In the days and weeks after the spraying, researchers monitored
what became of the mammals, birds, frogs, and fish exposed to the
pesticide. In their later report, the scientists noted that the initial gen-
eral enthusiasm for DDT should be tempered by “grave concern.”
The investigators cautioned that while most poisons affect living
organisms in different ways—such selectivity is a fundamental re-
quirement for any pesticide—all poisons are “a two-edged sword,”
and one as toxic as DDT would likely cause collateral damage to
were still at work, Carson had proposed a story to Reader’s Digest. She
began breezily enough, but ended on a frightening note:
“Practically at my backdoor here in Maryland, an experiment of
more than ordinary interest and importance is going on,” she wrote.
“We have all heard a lot about what DDT will soon do for us by wip-
ing out insect pests. The experiments at Patuxent have been planned
to show what other effects DDT may have if applied to wide areas;
what it will do to insects that are beneficial or even essential; how it
may affect waterfowl, or birds that depend on insect food; whether
it may upset the whole delicate balance of nature if unwisely used.”
The Reader’s Digest, lacking Carson’s vision, passed.
But Carson never stopped thinking about DDT, even as the ques-
tions about its safety raised in the Patuxent testing were largely ig-
nored. DDT quickly gained wide acceptance as an agricultural and
commercial product, thanks to its low cost, its deadly persistence
wherever and however it was used, and a wildly successful campaign
to portray the poison as a miraculous answer to the long struggle
against the insects that decimated crops and forests, plagued livestock,
and brought disease and misery to millions of people every year.
The uses for DDT seemed endless. It could be applied in pow-
ders or dusts, in assorted liquid sprays and emulsions, and in aerosol
“bombs” that housewives began purchasing in department stores as
early as 1945. The bombs used Freon (later found to be destructive of
the ozone layer) as a propellant and were claimed to treat an average-
sized room in as little as six seconds. DDT was sold in hardware and
grocery stores in products such as soap, furniture polish, shelf paper,
paint, and fabric treatments. DDT could be applied to lawns by means
of a fogging device that attached to the muffler of a lawn mower, dis-
persing a hot, poisonous cloud as the grass was cut. Airplanes sprayed
DDT over millions of acres of forest to kill woodland insects such as
the spruce budworm and the gypsy moth. It was sprayed in hospital
kitchens and in residential neighborhoods hit by Dutch elm disease.
In the South children played in the murk behind DDT fogging trucks
that cruised the streets during encephalitis outbreaks. In the fall of
10
11
The furor over Silent Spring began at once. In the weeks following
publication of the first excerpts in the New Yorker, moody stories ex-
pressing shock and outrage began appearing in newspapers across the
country. Some compared the book to Uncle Tom’s Cabin and predicted
an earthquake of change in the way pesticides were used. Most reports
nervously welcomed Carson’s dire warning about chemical con-
tamination of the environment, although many also acknowledged
a rapidly building counterattack from trade groups and a chemicals
industry that decried Carson’s book as unscientific and one-sided, ar-
guing that she took no account of the economic and health benefits
achieved through the use of pesticides.
Some of Carson’s detractors imagined her in league with a lunatic
fringe that included food faddists, anti-fluoridationists, organic farm-
ers, and soft-headed nature lovers. A major pesticide manufacturer
threatened Carson’s publisher, Houghton Miffl in, with a lawsuit if
Silent Spring was issued without changes, saying they believed and
would attempt to prove that Carson was a front for “sinister influ-
ences” in the Soviet Union and its Eastern European satellites that
were intent on undermining America. The U.S. Department of Ag-
12
riculture meanwhile told the New York Times it was being deluged
with letters from citizens expressing “horror and amazement” that
the agency permitted the wide use of such deadly poisons. The Book-
of-the-Month Club announced that Silent Spring would be its main
selection for October 1962, proof that Carson was still expected to
be popular even though she’d hit a nerve. A newspaper in London
reported that “a 55-year old spinster has written a book that is causing
more heart-searching in America than any book since Upton Sin-
clair’s The Jungle forced Chicago to clean up its abattoirs.”
Everyone remarked on the sharp and fatalistic tone of Silent
Spring—including, as Carson enjoyed noting, people who had not
read it. From its opening pages the book was a harrowing excursion
through a chemically strangled world. Carson made no attempt to
soften her vision of the future. At stake in the unrestrained use of
chemical pesticides was nothing less than human existence itself:
13
14
miles away. By the time Silent Spring had made it to number one on
the New York Times bestseller list on October 28, Cuba was under a
naval blockade and the United States and the Soviet Union were on
the brink of war. Eventually the Soviets backed down in the face of
U.S. resolve and removed the weapons from Cuba—but public anxi-
ety about the nuclear age remained high, joined now by a new worry
about chemicals contaminating the environment.
President Kennedy’s announcement that the government would
look into the pesticide issue was reassuring—but it hid a more compli-
cated reaction to Silent Spring forming behind the scenes in Washing-
ton and all along the web of connections that linked the government
to agricultural and industrial interests. The day after his press confer-
ence, Kennedy appointed a special commission, headed by his science
adviser Jerome Wiesner, to conduct a thorough review of pesticide
use. It also came to light that the DDT studies begun in the mid-
1940s at Patuxent had continued at a cost that had risen to $3 million
a year, despite little public attention and scant changes in the way
pesticides were used. Joining the Wiesner panel to evaluate pesticide
safety would be representatives from several federal agencies that were
themselves heavy users of DDT and other pesticides, and whose lack
of regard for the consequences had been pitilessly described in Silent
Spring. Meanwhile, the FBI did what the FBI usually did in such cases
and quietly launched an investigation of Carson that just happened to
coincide with the accusation that she was a Communist front.
Elsewhere within the administration a simmering hostility toward
Rachel Carson and Silent Spring was shaping a different side to the
government’s response. Immediately following the New Yorker serial-
ization, Secretary of Agriculture Orville Freeman ordered his inner
circle to begin developing plans for attacking the articles, apparently
on the reflexive assumption that his job was to oppose anything
inimical to the interests of farmers and agrichemical companies. But
Freeman wavered. Beleaguered over what to do about the milk sup-
ply in his home state of Minnesota, where strontium 90 contamina-
tion was approaching unsafe levels, Freeman simultaneously suggested
15
16
17
18
19
ONAFARTHERSHORE
atoneoft
heser
etai
l
ers: