Arxiv Pde Intro

a
r
X
i
v
:
1
0
0
4
.
2
1
3
4
v
1

[
m
a
t
h
.
A
P
]

1
3

A
p
r

2
0
1
0
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
AN INTRODUCTION
A.D.R. Choudary, Saima Parveen
Constantin Varsan
First Edition
Abdus Salam School of Mathematical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
A.D.Raza Choudary
Abdus Salam School of Mathematical Sciences,
GC University, Lahore, Pakistan.
choudary@cwu.edu
Saima Parveen
Abdus Salam School of Mathematical Sciences,
GC University, Lahore, Pakistan.
saimashaa@gmail.com
Constatin Varsan
Mathematical Institute of Romanian Academy
Bucharest, Romania.
constantin.varsan@imar.ro
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS: AN INTRODUCTION
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any
electronic or mechanical form, including photocopy, recording or otherwise, without
the prior permission of the publisher.
First Edition 2010.
ISBN 978-969-9236-07-6
c _respective authors, 2010
i
To our families
ii
Contents
Introduction 1
1 Ordinary Dierential Equations(ODE) 3
1.1 Linear System of Dierential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2 Fundamental Matrix of Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.2.1 Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.2.2 Constant Variation Formula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.3 Exercises and Some Problem Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.3.1 Linear Constant Coecients Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.3.2 Some Stability Problems and Their Solution . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.4 Nonlinear Systems of Dierential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.4.1 Existence and Uniqueness of C.P(f, x
0
, y
0
) . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1.4.2 Dierentiability of Solutions with Respect to
Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
iii
1.4.3 The Local Flow(Dierentiability Properties) . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1.4.4 Applications(Using Dierentiability of a Flow) . . . . . . . . . 29
1.5 Gradient Systems of Vector Fields and Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
1.5.1 Gradient System Associated to Finite Set of Vec-Fields . . . . 33
1.5.2 Frobenius Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
1.6 Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
2 First Order PDE 43
2.1 Cauchy Problem for the Hamilton-Jacobi
Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
2.2 Nonlinear First Order PDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
2.2.1 Examples of Scalar NonlinearODE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
2.2.2 Nonlinear Hamilton-Jacobi E quations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2.2.3 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
2.3 Stationary Solutions for Nonlinear Ist Order PDE . . . . . . . . . . . 56
2.3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
2.3.2 The Lie Algebra of Characteristic Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
2.3.3 Parameterized Stationary Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
2.3.4 The linear Case:H
0
(x, p) =< p, f
0
(x) > . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
2.3.5 The Case H
0
(x, p, u) = H
0
(x, p); Stationary Solutions . . . . . 66
iv
2.3.6 Some Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
2.4 Overdetermined System of 1st O.PDE & Lie Algebras . . . . . . . . . . . 70
2.4.1 Solution for Linear Homogeneous Over Determined System. . . 72
2.5 Nonsingular Representation of a Gradient System . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
2.6 1st Order Evolution System of PDE and C-K Theorem . . . . . . . . . 77
2.6.1 Cauchy-Kowalevska Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
2.6.2 1st Order Evolution System of Hyperbolic & Elliptic Equations 80
2.7 (E
3
) Plate Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
2.7.1 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
2.7.2 The Abstract Cauchy-Kawalewska Theorem . . . . . . . . . . 85
2.8 Appendix Innitesimal Invariance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
2.8.1 Groups and Dierential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
2.8.2 Prolongation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
2.8.3 Systems of Dierential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
2.8.4 Prolongation of Group Action and Vector Fields . . . . . . . . 90
2.8.5 Higher Order Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
3 Second Order PDE 93
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
3.2 Poisson Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
v
3.3 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
3.4 Maximum Principle for Harmonic Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
3.4.1 The Wave Equation;Kirchho,DAlembert & Poisson Formulas 101
3.5 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
3.5.1 System of Hyperbolic and Elliptic Equations(Denition) . . . . 110
3.6 Adjoint 2nd order operator;Green formulas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
3.6.1 Green Formula and Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
3.6.2 Applications of Riemann Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
3.6.3 Green function for Dirichlet problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
3.7 Linear Parabolic Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
3.7.1 The Unique Solution of the C.P (3.120) and (3.121) . . . . . . 119
3.7.2 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
3.7.3 Maximum Principle for Heat Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
3.8 Weak Solutions(Generalized Solutions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
3.8.1 Boundary Parabolic Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
3.8.2 Boundary Hyperbolic Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
3.8.3 Fourier Method, Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
3.9 Some Nonlinear Elliptic and Parabolic PDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
3.9.1 Nonlinear Parabolic Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
vi
3.9.2 Some Nonlinear Elliptic Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
3.10 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
3.11 Appendix I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
3.12 Appendix II Variational Method Involving PDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
3.12.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
3.12.2 E-L Equation for Distributed Parameters Functionals . . . . . 152
3.12.3 Examples of PDE Involving E-L Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
3.13 Appendix III Harmonic Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
3.13.1 Harmonic Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
3.13.2 Green Formulas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
3.13.3 Recovering a Harmonic Function Inside a Ball I . . . . . . . . . 161
3.13.4 Recovering a Harmonic Function Inside a Ball II . . . . . . . . 164
4 Stochastic Dierential Equations 167
4.1 Properties of continuous semimartingales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
4.2 Approximations of the diusion equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
4.3 Stochastic rule of derivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
4.4 Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
4.4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
4.4.2 Some problems and their solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
vii
4.4.3 Solution for the Problem (P1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
4.4.4 Solution for the Problem (P2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
4.4.5 Multiple vector elds case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
4.4.6 Solution for (P1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
4.4.7 Solution for (P2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
viii
Introduction
This book is encompassing those mathematical methods used in describing and solving
second order partial dierential equation (PDE) of elliptic, hyperbolic and parabolic
type.
Our priority is to make this dicult subject accessible to those interested in applying
mathematics using dierential equations as models. It is accomplished by adding some
fundamental results from ordinary dierential equations (ODE) regarding ows and
their dierentiability properties which are useful in constructing solution of Hamilton
Jacobi equations.
The analysis of rst order Cauchy-Kowalevska system is limited to their application
in constructing analytical solution for hyperbolic and elliptic equations which are fre-
quently used in Physics and Mechanics.
The exposition is subjected to a gradually presentations and the classical methods
called as Fourier, Riemann, Fredholm integral equations and the corresponding Green
functions are analyzed by solving signicant examples.
The analysis is not restricted to the linear equations. Non linear parabolic equation
or elliptic equations are included enlarging the meaning of the weak solution.
This university text includes a Lie-geometric analysis of gradient systems of vector
elds and their algebraic representation with a direct implication in treating both rst
order overdetermined systems with singularities and solutions for rst order PDE.
We are aware that a scientic presentation of PDE must contain an additional text
introducing several results from multidimensional analysis and it is accomplished in-
cluding Gauss-Ostrogadsky formula, variational methods of deriving PDE and recov-
ering harmonic functions from its boundary values (see appendices I,II,III of chapter
III).
Each chapter of this book includes exercises and problems which can be solved pro-
vided the given hints are used.
Partially, some subjects of this university-text have been lectured at Abdus Salam
School of Mathematical Sciences (ASSMS), Lahore and it is our belief that this pre-
sentation deserve a wider distribution among universities having graduate program
in mathematics.
The authors express their gratitude to Abdus Salam School of Mathematical Sciences
(ASSMS) of GC University Lahore for their encouragements and assistance in writing
1
2 Introduction
this book.
This book also includes two subjects that encompass good connection of PDE with
dierential geometry and stochastic analysis. The rst subject is represented by gra-
dient systems of vector elds and their inuence in solving rst order overdetermined
systems. The second subject introduces approximations of SDE by ODE which can
be meaningful in deriving signicant results of stochastic partial dierential equa-
tions(SPDE) represented here by stochastic rule of derivation.Our belief is that such
subjects must be presented in any introductory monography treating PDE.
Chapter 1
Ordinary Dierential
Equations(ODE)
1.1 Linear System of Dierential Equations
A linear system of dierential equations is described by the following scalar dierential
equations
dy
i
dx
=
n
j=1
a
ij
(x)y
j
+b
i
(x), x I R, i = 1, 2, ..., n (1.1)
where the scalar functions a
ij
and b
i
are continuous on the interval I R(a
ij
, b
i

C(I; R)). Denote z = col(y
1
, . . . , y
n
) R
n
as the column vector of the unknown
functions and rewrite (1.1) as a linear vector system
dz
dx
= A(x)z +b(x), x I R, z R
n
(1.2)
where A = (a
ij
), (i, j) 1, . . . , n stands for the corresponding n n continuous
matrix valued function and b = col(b
1
, . . . , b
n
) R
n
is a continuous function on I
valued in R
n
. A solution of the system (1.2) means a continuous function z(x) :
I R
n
which is continuously dierentiable (z (
1
(I; R
n
)) and satises (1.2) for any
x I, i.e
dz
dx
(x) = A(x)z(x) +b(x), for all x I. The computation of a solution as a
combination of elementary functions and integration is not possible without assuming
some particular structures regarding the involved matrix A. As far as some qualitative
results are concerned (existence and uniqueness of a solution ) we do not need to add
new assumptions on the A and a Cauchy problem solution receives a positive answer.
3
4 CHAPTER 1. ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS(ODE)
For a xed pair (x
0
, z
0
) I R
n
we dene z(x) : x I as the solution of the
system (1.2) satisfying z(x
0
) = z
0
(Cauchy problem solution). To prove uniqueness
of a Cauchy problem solution we recall a standard lemma.
Lemma 1.1.1. (Gronwall) Let (x), (x) : [a, b] [0, ) and a constant M 0 be
given such that the following integral inequality is valid
(x) M +
_
x
a
(t)(t)dt, x [a, b]
where and are continuous scalar functions. Then
(x) Mexp
_
b
a
(t)dt, x [a, b]
Proof. Denote (x) = M +
_
b
a
(x)(t)dt and a straight computation lead us to
(x) (x), [a, b] and
_
d(x)
dx
= (x)(x) (x)(x), x [a, b]
(a) = M
(1.3)
The dierential inequality in (1.3) can be written as a scalar equation
_
d(x)
dx
= (x)(x) +(x), x [a, b]
(a) = M
(1.4)
where (x) 0, x [a, b]. Using the integral representation of of the scalar equation
solution we get
(x) = [exp
_
x
a
(t)dt]M +
_
x
a
(exp
_
t
a
(s)ds)(t)dt
and as consequence(see (x) 0, x [a, b])we obtain
(x) (x) M[exp
_
b
a
(t)dt], x [a, b]
Theorem 1.1.2. (Existence and uniqueness of Cauchy problem solution)
Let A(x) : I M
nn
(n n matrices) and b(x) : I R
n
be continuous functions
and x
0
I R
n
be xed. Then there exists a unique solution z(x) : I R
n
of the
system satisfying the initial condition z(x
0
) = z
0
(Cauchy condition).
Proof. We notice that a solution z(x) : x I of (1.2) satisfying z(x
0
) = z
0
fulls
1.1. LINEAR SYSTEM OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 5
the following integral equation
z(x) = z
0
+
_
x
x0
[A(t)z(t) +b(t)]dt, x I (1.5)
and conversely any continuous function z(x) : I R
n
which satises (1.5) is contin-
uously dierentiable
and
dz
dx
= A(x)z +b(x), x I, z(x
0
) = z
0
We suggest to look for a continuous function satisfying integral equation (1.5) and it
is accomplished using Picards iteration method which involves the following sequence
of continuous functions z
k
(x) : x I
ko
z
0
(x) = z
0
, z
k+1
(x) = z
0
+
_
x
x0
[A(t)z
k
(t) +b(t)]dt (1.6)
For each compact interval J I, x
0
J, the sequence z
k
(x) : x J
ko
((J; R
n
)
(Banach space) is a Cauchy sequence in a Banach space, where
z
k+1
(x) = z
0
+u
1
+u
2
... +u
k+1
, u
j+1
(x) = z
j+1
(x) z
j
(x), j 0 (1.7)
In this respect, z
k
(x) : x J rewritten as in (1.7) coincides with a partial sum of
the following series
(x) = z
0
+u
1
+ u
2
... +u
k
+..., x J (1.8)
and the convergence of
(x) : x J ((J; R
n
) can be obtained using a convergent
numerical series as an upper bound for it. The corresponding convergent numerical
series is of exponential type and it is contained in the following estimate. Using
standard induction argument we prove
[ u
j+1
(x) [ (1+ [ z
0
[)
k
j+1
[x x
0
[
j+1
(j + 1)!
, j 0, x J (1.9)
where
k = max(max
tJ
[ A(t) [, max
tJ
[ b(t) [)
For j = 0 we see easily that [ u
1
[ (1+ [ z
0
[)k [ (x x
0
) [, x J, and using
u
j+2
(x) = z
j+2
(x) z
j+1
(x) =
_
x
x0
A(t)u
j+1
(t)dt
we get
[ u
j+2
(x) [ k
_
|(xx0)|
x0
[ u
j+1
(t) [ dt (1+ [ z
0
[)
k
j+2
[(x x
0
)[
j+2
(j + 2)!
, x J (1.10)
provided u
j+1
(x) : x J satises (1.9). As a consequence, the inequality (1.9)
show us that
[ u
j+1
(x) [ (1+ [ z
0
[)
k
j+1
[ J [
j+1
(j + 1)
, j 0, x J (1.11)
where [ J [= max
xJ
[ x x
0
[and the corresponding convergent numerical series is
given by (1+ [ z
0
[)expk [ J [, where the constant k 0 is dened in (1.9). Using(1.11)
into (1.8) we obtain that sequencez
k
(x) : x I
ko
dened in (1.6) is uniformly
convergent to a continuous function z
j
(x) : x J and by passing k in (1.6)
we get
z
j
(x) = z
0
+
_
x
x0
[A(t)z
j
(t) +b(t)]dt, x J (1.12)
It shows that z
j
(x) : x J is continuously dierentiable, z
j
(x
0
) = z
0
and satises
(1.2) for any x J I. Dene z(x) : x I as a inductive limit of the sequence
z
m
(x) = z
jm
(x) : x J
m
m1
where
I =
_
m=1
J
m
, J
m+1
J
m
, x
0
J
m
Then z(x) = z
m
(x), x J
m
, m 1 is continuously dierentiable function satisfying
integral equation (1.5).
Uniqueness
It will be proved by contradiction and assuming another solution z
1
(x) : x I
of (2)exits such that z
1
(x
0
) = z
0
and z
1
(x
) ,= z(x
) for some x
I then u(x) =
z(x) z
1
(x), x I, veries the following linear system
u(x) =
_
x
x0
A(t)u(t)dt, x I, where z(x), x I is dened above . (1.13)
Let J I be a compact interval such that x
0
, x
I and assuming that x

0
x
we
get
(x) =[ u(x) [
_
x0+|xx0|
x0
(t)(t)dt, x [x
0
, x
] (1.14)
where (t) =[ A(t) [ 0 and (t) =[ u(t) [ are continuous scalar functions. Using
Lemma 1.1.1 withM = 0 we obtain (x) = 0 for any x [x
0
, x
] contradicting
(x
) > 0. The proof for x

0
> x
is similar. The proof is complete.

1.2. FUNDAMENTAL MATRIX OF SOLUTION 7
1.2 Fundamental Matrix of Solution
A linear homogenous system is described by
dz
dx
= A(x)z, z R
n
(1.15)
where the (n n) matrix A(x), x I is a continuous mapping valued in M
nn
. Let
x
0
I be xed and denote z
i
(x) : x I the unique solution of (1.15) satisfying the
Cauchy condition z
i
(x
0
) = e
i
R
n
, i 1, 2, ..., n
where e
1
, ..., e
n
R
n
is the canonical basis. Denote
C(x; x
0
) =| z
1
(x)....z
n
(x) |, x I (1.16)
where z
i
(x) R
n
is a column vector. The matrix C(x; x
0
), x I dened in (1.16),
is called the fundamental matrix of solutions associated with linear system (1.15).
Let S C(I; R
n
) be the real linear space consisting of all solutions verifying (1.15).
The following properties of the fundamental matrix C(x; x
0
), x I are obtained by
straight computation.
1.2.1 Properties
Lemma 1.2.1. Let x
0
I be xed and consider the fundamental matrix C(x; x
0
), x
I dened in(1.16)
Letz(x) : x I be an arbitrary solution of (1.15) (1.17)
Then
z(x) = C(x; x
0
)z
0
, x I, where z(x
0
) = z
0
C(x; x
0
), x I is continuously dierentiable (1.18)
_
dC(x;x0)
dx
= A(x)C(x; x
0
), x I
C(x
0
; x
0
) = I
n
(unit matrix)
(1.19)
det C(x; x
0
) ,= 0, x I and D(x; x
0
) = [C(x; x
0
)]
1
satises (1.20)
_
dD(x;x0)
dx
= D(x; x
0
)A(x), x I
D(x
0
; x
0
) = I
n
(unit matrix)
(1.21)
dimS = n (1.22)
Proof. For z(.) S, let z
0
= z(x
0
) R
n
be column vector and consider z(x) =
C(x; x
0
)z
0
, x I. Notice that each column of C(x; x
0
) is a solution of (1.15). As far
as S is a linear space then z(x) : x I is a solution of (1.15) fullling the Cauchy
condition
z(x
0
) = C(x
0
; x
0
)z
0
Therefore
z(x) : x Iand z(x) : x I
are solutions for the linear system (1.15) satisfying the same Cauchy condition z(x
0
) =
z
0
= z(x
0
) and using the uniqueness of the Cauchy problem solution (see Theorem
1.1.2) we get
z(x) = z(x) = C(x; x
0
)z
0
for anyx I
The conclusion (1.17) is proved. To get (1.19) we notice that each component z
i
(x) :
x I of C(x; x
0
), x I, satises (1.15) and it shows directly that
dC(x; x
0
)
dx
=|
dz
1
dx
...
dz
n
dx
|= A(x)C(x; x
0
), x I (1.23)
and
C(x
0
; x
0
) =| e
1
...e
n
|= I
n
(1.24)
The property (1.20) can be proved by contradiction. Assuming that C(x
; x
0
)z
0
= 0
for some x
I and z
0
R
n
, z
0
,= 0, we get that the solution z
(x) = C(x; x
0
)z
0
, x
I of (1.15) satises z
(x
) = 0 which implies (see uniqueness) z
(x) = 0, x I
contradicting z
(x
0
) = z
0
,= 0.Therefore detC(x, x
0
) ,= 0 for any x I and denote
D(x; x
0
) = [C(x; x
0
)]
1
. On the other hand, consider D
1
(x; x
0
) : x I as the
unique solution of the linear matrix system
_
dD1(x;x0)
dx
= D
1
(x; x
0
)A(x), x I
D
1
(x
0
; x
0
) = I
n
(unit matrix)
(1.25)
and by straight derivation we get
D
1
(x; x
0
C(x; x
0
) = I
n
, x I (1.26)
The equation (1.25) shows that D(x; x
0
) = [C(x; x
0
)]
1
, x I. The last property
(1.22) is a direct consequence of (1.17) and (1.20). Using (1.17), we see easily that
dimS n and from (1.20) we obtain that z
1
(x), ...z
n
(x) : x I are n linearly
independent solutions of (1.15). The proof is complete.
Any basis of S will be called a fundamental system of solutions satisfying (1.15)
and we shall conclude this section recalling Liouvilletheorem.
Theorem 1.2.2. Let the (n n) continuous matrix A(x) = [a
ij
(x)]
i,j
be given and
consider n solutions z
1
(x), ..., z
n
(x) : x I satisfying the linear system (1.15).
1.2. FUNDAMENTAL MATRIX OF SOLUTION 9
Then W(x) : x I is the solution of the following linear scalar equation
dW(x)
dx
= (TrA(x))W(x), x I , W(x) = det | z
1
(x), ..., z
n
(x) | (1.27)
where
TrA(x) =
n
i=1
a
ii
(x) and W(x) = W(x
0
)exp
_
x
x0
[TrA(t)]dt, x I
for some xed x
0
I.
Proof. By denition
d zi(x)
dx
= A(x) z
i
(x), x I, i 1, ..., n and the matrix Z(x) =|
z
1
(x)... z
n
(x) | satises
dZ(x)
dx
= A(x)Z(x), x I (1.28)
Rewrite Z(x) using row vectors
Z(x) =
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
(x)
.
.
.
n
(x)
_
_
_
_
_
_
, I (1.29)
and from (1.27) we get easily
d
i
(x)
dx
=
n
j=1
a
ij
(x)
j
(x), i 1, ..., n, x I (1.30)
where (a
i1
(x), ...a
in
(x)) stands for the row i of the involved matrix
A(x) = (a
ij
(x))
i,j{1,...,n}
.. On the other hand, the standard rule of derivation for a
det Z(x) = W(x) gives us
dW(x)
dx
=
n
i=1
W
i
(x), where W
i
(x) = det
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
(x)
.
.
.
i1
(x)
di(x)
dx
i+1
(x)
.
.
.
n
(x)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(1.31)
and using (1.29) we obtain
W
i
(x) = a
ii
(x)W(x) , i 1, ..., n (1.32)
Combining (1.30) and (1.32) we get the scalar equation
dW(x)
dx
= (
n
i=1
a
ii
(x))W(x), x I (1.33)
which is the conclusion of theorem.The proof is complete.
We shall conclude by recalling the constant variation formula used for integral
representation of a solution satisfying a linear system.
1.2.2 Constant Variation Formula
Theorem 1.2.3. (Constant variation formula) We are given continuous mappings
A(x) : I M
nn
and b(x) : I R
n
Let C(x; x
0
), x I be the fundamental matrix of solutions associated with the linear
homogenous system
dz
dx
= A(x)z, x I, z R
n
(1.34)
Let z(x), x Ibe the unique solution of the linear system with a Cauchy condition
z(x
0
) = z
0
_
dz
dx
= A(x)z +b(x), x I
z(x
0
) = z
0
(1.35)
Then
z(x) = ((x; x
0
)[z
0
+
_
x
x0
(
1
(t; x
0
)b(t)dt], x I (1.36)
Proof. By denition z(x), x I fullling (1.36) is a solution of the linear system
(1.35) provided a straight derivation calculus is used. In addition using z(x) = z
0
and
uniqueness of the Cauchy problem solution (see Theorem 1.1.2) we get the conclusion.
Remark 1.2.4. The constant variation formula expressed in (1.36) suggest that the
general solution of the linear system (1.35) can be written as a sum of the general
solution C(x; x
0
)z
0
, x I fullling linear homogeneous system (1.34) and a particular
1.3. EXERCISES AND SOME PROBLEM SOLUTIONS 11
solution (1.35) (see z
0
= 0) given by
C(x; x
0
)
_
x
x0
(
1
(t; x
0
)b(t)dt, x I (1.37)
Remark 1.2.5. There is no real obstruction for dening solution of a linear system
of integral equation
z(x) = z
0
+
_
x
a
[A(t)z(t) +b(t)]dt, x [a, b] R, z R
n
(1.38)
where the matrix A(x) M
nn
and the vector b(x) R
n
are piecewise continuous
mappings of x [a, b] such that A(x) and b(x) are continuous functions on [x
i
, x
i+1
)
admitting bounded left limits
A(x
i+1
0) = lim
xxi+1
A(x), b(x
i+1
0) = lim
xxi+1
b(x)for eachi 1, 2, ..., N 1
(1.39)
Here a = x
0
< x
1
< ... < x
N
= b is an increasing sequence such that [a, b] = [x
0
, x
N
].
Starting with an arbitrary Cauchy condition z(x
0
) = z
0
R
n
, we construct the cor-
responding solution z(x), x [a, b], as a continuous mapping which is continuously
dierentiable on each open interval (x
i
, x
i+1
), i 1, 2, ..., N 1 such that the con-
clusions of the above given result are preserved. We have to take the case of these
equations implying derivation
dz(x;x0,z0)
dx
of the solution and to mention that they are
valid on each open interval (x
i
, x
i+1
), i 1, 2, ..., N 1 where the matrix A(x) and
the vector b(x) are continuous functions. Even more, admitting that the components
of the matrix A(x) : x [a, b] and vector b(x) : x [a, b]are complex valued func-
tions then the unique Cauchy problem solution of the linear system (1.38) is dened
as z(x) C
n
: x [a, b], z(a) = z
0
C
n
satisfying (1.38) x [a, b].
1.3 Exercises and Some Problem Solutions
1.3.1 Linear Constant Coecients Equations(Fundamental Sys-
tem of Solutions
(P
1
). Compute the fundamental matrix of solutions C(x, 0) for a linear constant
coecients system
dz(x)
dx
= Az, x R, z R
n
, A M
nn
(1.40)
Solution Since A is a constant matrix we are looking for the fundamental matrix
of solutions C(x) = C(x, 0), where x
0
= 0 is xed and as it is mentioned in Lemma
(1.2.1) (see equation (1.18)). We need to solve the following matrix equation
_
dC(x)
dx
= AC(x), x R
C(0) = I
n
(1.41)
The computation of C(x) : x R relies on the fact that the unique matrix solution
of (1.40) is given by the following matrix exponential series
expAx = I
n
+
x
1!
A +... +
x
k
k!
A
k
+... (1.42)
where the uniform convergence of the matrix series on compact intervals is a direct
consequence of comparing it with a numerical convergent series. By direct derivation
we get
_
d(expAx)
dx
= A +
x
1!
A
2
+... +
x
k
k!
A
k+1
+... = A(exp Ax), x R
(expAx)
x=0
= I
n
(1.43)
and it shows that C(x) = expAx, x R. It suggest the rst method of computing
C(x) by using partial sum of the series (1.42)
(P
2
). Find a fundamental system of solutions(basis of S) for the linear constant
coecients system
dz
dx
= Az, x R, z R
n
, A M
nn
(1.44)
using the eigenvalues (A)(spectrum of A).
Case I
The characteristic polynomial det(AI
n
) = P() has n real distinct roots
1
, ...
n

R, i.e (A) =
1
, ...
n
,
i
,=
j
, i ,= j. Let v
i
,= 0, v
i
R
n
be an eigenvector corre-
sponding to the eigenvalue
i
(A), i.e
Av
i
=
i
v
i
, i 1, ..., n (1.45)
By denition ,v
1
, .., v
n
R
n
is a basis in R
n
and dene the vector functions
z
i
(x) = (exp
i
x)v
i
, x R, i 1, ..., n (1.46)
Each z
i
(x) : x R satises (1.43) and z
1
(x), ..., z
n
(x) is a basis of the linear
space S consisting of all solutions satisfying (1.43). Therefore,any solutionz(x) : x
I of the system (1.43) can be found as a linear combination of z
1
(.), ..., z
n
(.) and
1
, ...,
n
from z(x) =
n
i=i
i
z
i
(x), x R will be determined by imposing Cauchy
condition z(0) = z
0
R
n
.
Case II
The characteristic polynomial P() = det(A I
n
) has n complex numbers as roots
1
, ...,
n
= (A),
i
,=
j
, i ,= j. As in the real case we dene n complex valued
solutions satisfying (1.43)
z
j
(x) = (exp
j
x)v
j
, j 1, ..., n (1.47)
where v
j
R
n
is an eigenvector corresponding to a real eigenvalue
j
(A) and
v
j
C
n
is a complex eigenvector corresponding to the complex eigenvalue
j
(A)
such that v
j
= a
j
ib
j
, (v
j
= a
j
+ ib
j
) is the eigenvector corresponding to the eigen
value
j
=
j
i
j
, (
j
=
j
+ i
j
,
j
,= 0). From z
1
(x), ..., z
n
(x); x R dened
in (1.47) we construct another n real solutions z
1
(x), ..., z
n
(x); x R as follows
(n = m+ 2k). The rst m real solutions
z
i
(x) = (exp
i
x)v
i
, i 1, ..., m (1.48)
when
1
, ...,
m
(A) are the real eigenvalues of A and another 2k real solutions
_
z
m+j
(x) = Re z
m+j
(x) =
zm+j(x)+ z
m+j+k
(x)
2
z
m+k+j
(x) = Im z
m+j
(x) =
zm+j(x) z
m+k+j
(x)
2i
(1.49)
for any j 1, ..., k. Here
m+1
, ...,
m+2k
(A) are the complex eigenvalues
such that
m+j+k
=
m+j
for any j 1, ..., k. Since z
1
(x), ..., z
n
(x); x R are
linearly independent over reals and the linear transformation used in (1.47) and (1.48)
is a nonsingular one, we get z
1
(x), ..., z
n
(x); x Ras a basis of S.
Case III: General Case
(A) =
1
, ...
d
R, where the eigenvalue
j
has a multiplicity n
j
and n =
n
1
+... +n
d
.In this case the canonical Jordan form of the matrix A is involved which
allows to construct a basis of S using an adequate transformation T : R
n
R
n
. It
relies on the factors decomposition of the characteristic polynomial det(A I
n
) =
P() = (
1
)
n1
...(
d
)
n
d
and using Caylay-Hamilton theorem we get
_
P(A) = 0(null matrix)
(A
1
I
n
)
n1
...(A
d
I
n
)
n
d
= 0(null mapping : C
n
C
n
)
(1.50)
The equations (1.49) are essential for nding a n n nonsingular matrix Q =|
v
1
...v
n
| such that the linear transformation z = Qy leads us to a similar matrix
B = Q
1
AQ(B A) for which the corresponding linear system
dy
dx
= By, B = diag(B
1
, ..., B
d
), dimB
j
= n
j
, j 1, ..., d (1.51)
has a fundamental matrix of solution.
Y (x) = expBx = diag(expB
1
x, ..., expB
d
x)
Here
B
j
=
j
I
nj
+C
nj
, and
_
_
_
_
_
_
0 0 0 . . 0
1 0 0 . . 0
0 1 0 . . o
. . . . . .
0 0 0 . 1 0
_
_
_
_
_
_
= C
nj
has the nilpotent property (C
nj
)
nj
= 0 (null matrix). The general case can be com-
puted in a more attractive way when the linear constant coecients system comes
from n-th order scalar dierential equation . In this respect consider a linear n-th
order scalar dierential equation
y
n
(x) +a
1
y
(n1)
(x) +... +a
n
y(x) = 0, x R (1.52)
Denote z(x) = (y(x), y
(1)
(x), ..., y
(n1)
(x)) R
n
and (1.51) can be written as a linear
system for the unknown z.
dz
dx
= A
0
z, z R
n
, x R (1.53)
where
A
0
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
b
1
.
.
.
b
n
_
_
_
_
_
_
b
1
= (0, 1, 0, ..., 0), ...b
n1
= (0, ..., o, 1)and b
n
= (a
n
, ..., a
1
)
The characteristic polynomial associated with A
0
is given by
P
0
() = det(A
0
I
n
) =
n
+a
1
n1
+... +a
n1
+a
n
(1.54)
where a
i
R, i 1, ..., n are given in (1.52). In this case, a fundamental sys-
tem of solutions (basis) y
1
(x), ..., y
n
(x) : x R for (1.51) determines a basis
z
1
(x), ..., z
n
(x) : x R) for (1.52), where
z
i
(x) = columny
i
(x), y
(1)
i
(x)..., y
(n1)
i
(x), i 1, ..., n
In addition, a basis y
1
(x), y
2
(x)..., y
n
(x) for the scalar equation (1.51) is given by
F =
d
j=1
F
j
where
F
j
= (exp
j
x), x(exp
j
x), ..., x
nj 1
(exp
j
x) (1.55)
if the real
j
(A
0
) has the multiplicity degree n
j
, and
F
j
= Fj(cos)
_
F
j
(sin), if the complex
j
(A
0
) ,
j
=
j
+i
j
(1.56)
has the multiplicity degree n
j
, where
F
j
(cos) = (exp
j
x), x(exp
j
x), ..., x
nj 1
(exp
j
x)(cos
j
x), x R
F
j
(sin) = (exp
j
x), x(exp
j
x), ..., x
nj 1
(exp
j
x)(sin
j
x), x R
1.3.2 Some Stability Problems and Their Solution
(P
1
). z(x; z
0
) = [expAx]z
0
, x [0, ), be the solution of the
dz
dx
= Az, x [0, ), z(0) = z
0
R
n
(1.57)
We say that z(x, z
0
) : x 0is exponentially stable if
[ z(x, z
0
) [[ z
0
[ (exp x), x [0, ), z
0
R
n
(1.58)
where the constant > 0 does not depend on z
0
. Assume that
(A +A
t
) =
1
, ...,
d
satises
i
< 0 for any i 1, ..., d (1.59)
Then z(x, z
0
) : x [0.)is exponentially stable
Solution of P
1
For each z
0
R
n
, the corresponding Cauchy problem solution z(x, z
0
) = (expAx)
z
0
, x 0, satises (1.56) and in addition,the scalar function (x) =[ z(x, z
0
) [
2
, x
0 fulls the following dierential inequality
d(x)
dx
= (A +A
t
) z(x, z
0
), z(x, z
0
) 2w(x), x 0 (1.60)
where
2w = max
1
, ...,
d
< o
provided the condition (1.58) is assumed. A simple explanation of this statement
comes from the diagonal representation of the symmetric matrix (A + A
t
) when an
orthogonal transformation T : R
n
R
n
, z = Ty(T = T
1
)is performed.We get
(A +A
t
) z(x, z
0
), z(x, z
0
) = [T
1
(A +A
t
)T] y(x; z
0
), y(x; z
0
) (1.61)
where
T
1
(A +A
t
)T = diag(
1
, ...,
n
)
and
i
(A +A
t
) for each 1, ..., n
Using (1.60)we see easily that
(A +A
t
) z(x, z
0
), z(x, z
0
) [max
1
, ...
d
] [ z(x, z
0
) [
2
= 2w(x) (1.62)
where
2w = max
1
, ...,
d
< o
and
(x) =[ z(x; , z
0
) [
2
= T y(x; z
0
), T y(x; z
0
) = y(x; z
0
), T
t
T y(x; z
0
) =[ y(x; z
0
) [
2
are used. The inequality (1.61) shows that (1.59) is valid and denoting
0 (x) =
d(x)
dx
2w(x), x 0
we rewrite (1.59) as a scalar dierential equation
_
d(x)
dx
= 2w(x) +(x), x 0
(0) = [ z
0
[
(1.63)
where (x) 0, x [0, ), is a continuous function.The unique solution of (1.62)
can be represented by
(x) = [exp2wx][[ z
0
[
2
+
_
x
0
(exp 2wt)(t)dt] (1.64)
and using (exp 2wt)(x) 0 for any t 0 we get
_
(x) [exp2wx] [ z
0
[
2
[ z(x, z
0
) = [(x)]
1
2
[expwx] [ z
0
[
(1.65)
for any x 0. It shows that the exponential stability expressed in (1.57) is valid
when the condition (1.58) is assumed.
(P
2
) (Lyapunov exponent associated with linear system and piecewise continuous
solutions) Let y(t, x) R
n
: t 0 be the unique solution of the following linear
system of dierential equations
_
dy(t)
dt
= f(y(t), (t)), t 0, y(t) R
n
y(0) = x R
n
(1.66)
where the vector eld f(y, ) : R
n
R
n
is a continuous mapping of (y, )
R
n
and linear with respect to y R

n
f(y, ) = A()y +a(), A() M
nn
, a() R
n
. (1.67)
Here (t) : [0, )

(bounded set) R
d
is an arbitrary piecewise continuous
function satisfying
(t) = (t
k
), t [t
k
, t
k+1
), k 0 (1.68)
where 0 =

t
0

t
1
...

t
k
is an increasing sequence with lim
k
t
k
= . The analysis will
be done around a piecewise constant trajectory y(t) : [0, ) Y (bounded set) R
n
such that
(t) = ( y(t), (t)) : [o, ) Y
= R
n
R
d
(1.69)
satises

(t) =

(
t
k
), t [
t
k
,
t
k+1
), k 0, where the increasing sequence
t
k
k0
is
xed in (1.68). Dene a linear vector eld g(z, ) by
g(z, ) = f(z +; ) = A()z +f(), = (, ) , z R
n
where f(y; ) (1.70)
is given in (1.66). Let the continuous mapping z(t, x) : t 0 be the unique solution
of the following dierential equation
_
dz(t)
dt
= g(z(t);
(t)), t 0
z(0) = x
(1.71)
where the piecewise continuous function
(t), t 0 is given in (1.68). We may and

do associate the following piecewise continuous mapping z(t, x) : t 0 satisfying
the following linear system with jumps
_
d z(t)
dt
= f( z(t), (t)), t [
t
k
,
t
k+1
), z(t) R
n
z(
t
k
) = z(
t
k
, x) + y(t
k
), k 0
(1.72)
where z(t, x) : t 0is the continuous mapping satisfying (1.70). It is easily seen
that the piecewise continuous mapping z(t, x) : t 0 can be decomposed as follows
z(t, x) = z(t, x) + y(t, x), t 0, x R
n
(1.73)
and the asymptotic behavior
lim
t
z(t, x) = lim
t
y(t), x R
n
, is valid provided lim
t
y(t) exists and
lim
t
[ z(t, x) [
2
= 0 (1.74)
for x R
n
. We say thatz(t, x) : t 0 satisfying (1.70) is asymptotically stable if
(1.73) is valid.
Denition 1.3.1. A constant < 0 is a Lypounov exponent for z(t, x) : t 0 if
z(t, x) = (expt)z(t, x) : t 0is asymptotically stable.
Remark 1.3.2. Notice that if z(t, x) : t 0 satises (1.70) then z
(t, x) =
(expt)z(t, x) : t 0, satises the following augmented linear system
_
dz(t)
dt
= z
(t) + (expt)g(z(t), (t)), t 0

z
(0) = x
(1.75)
In addition, the piecewise continuous mapping
z
(t, x) = z
(t, x) + y(t), t 0 (1.76)

satises the following system with jumps
_
d z(t)
dt
= [ z
(t) y(t)] + (expt)f( z
(t), (t)), t 0
z
(t
k
) = z
t
k
, x) + y(
t
k
) .
(1.77)
It shows that the Lyapunov exponent < 0 found for the continuous mapping z(t, x) :
t 0 satisfying (1.70) gives the answer for the following asymptotic behavior asso-
ciated with z(t, x)
lim
t
[ z
(t, x) y(t) [
2
= lim
t
[ z
(t, x) [= 0 , for each x R

n
(1.78)
and the analysis will be focussed on getting Lyapunov exponents for the continuous
mapping z(t, x) : t 0
A description of the Lyapunov exponent associated with the continuous mapping
z(t, x) : t 0 can be associated using the corresponding integral equation satised
by a scalar continuous function
h
(t, x) = (exp2t)h(z(t, x)), t 0, where h(z) =[ z [

2
(1.79)
In this respect,applying standard rule of derivation we get
_
d z(t,x)
dt
= (exp2t)[2h +L
g
(h)]( z
(t, x),
(t), t 0
h
(0, x) = [ x [
2
(1.80)
where the rst order dierential operator L
g
: P
2
(z, ) P
2
(z, ) is given by
L
g
()(z, ) =<
z
(z, )), g(z, ) > (1.81)
Here P
2
(z, ) consist of all polynomial scalar functions of second degree with respect
to the variables z = (z
1
, ..., z
n
) and with continuous coecients as functions of .
In particular, for h P
2
(z, ), h(z) =[ z [
2
, we obtain
L
g
()(z, ) = <
z
h(z), g(z, ) >=< [A() +A
()z, z] > +2 < f(), z >

= < B()z, z > +2 < f(), z > (1.82)
where the matrix B() = A() + A
()is symmetric for each

R
d
and
for f() = A()v +a(), = (v, ) = Y
, given in (1.66). Rewrite (1.79) as

follows (see(1.71))
dh
(t, x)
dt
= [ [ h
(t, x) (exp2t) < [[ [ I

n
B( (t))]z(t, x) >
+ 2(exp2t) < f((t)), z(t, x) >, t 0 . (1.83)
Regarding the symmetric matrix
Q
() =[ [ I
n
B(),
R
d
we notice that it can be dened as positively dened matrix uniformly with respect
to
< Q
()z, z > c [ z [
2
, z R
n
,
, for some c 0 (1.84)

provided, [ [| B |, where
| B |= sup
| B() |
In this respect, let T() : R
n
R
n
be an orthogonal matrix (T
() = T
1
()) such
that
_
T
1
()B()T() = diag(
1
(), ...,
n
()) =
()
B()e
j
() =
j
()e
j
(), j 1, 2, ..., n
(1.85)
where T() =| e
1
(), ..., e
n
() |. On the other hand ,using the same matrix T() we
get
T
1
()Q
()T() = diag(
1
(), ...,
n
()) =
() (1.86)
where
i
() =[ [
i
() c > 0 for any
, i 1, ..., n, provided
[ [>| B | and we get
[ [>| B | sup
| B() || B()e
j
() |= sup
[
j
() [, j 1, ..., n (1.87)
Using (1.85), it makes sense to consider the square root of the positively dened
matrix Q
()
_
[Q
()] = T()[
()]
1
2
.T
1
() = P
(),
R
d
(1.88)
and rewrite < Q
()z, z > 2 < f(), z >=
(z, ) as follows
(z, ) =[ P
()z R
()f() [
2
[ R
()f() [
2
(1.89)
where
R
() =
_
Q
1
() = T()[
()]
1/2
T
1
() .
Using (1.88) we get the following dierential equation
dh
(t; x)
dt
= [ [ h
(t; x) (exp2t) [ P
( (t)z(t; x) R
( , t)f(
(t))) [
2
+ (exp2t) [ R
( (t))f(
)(t) [
2
, t 0 (1.90)
The integral representation of the solution h
(t; x) : t 0 fullling (1.90) leads us

directly to
h
(t; x) = (expt)[[ x [
2
+
_
t
0
(exps) [ R
()(s)f((s)) [
2
ds] (1.91)
(expt)
_
t
0
(exps) [ P
( (t)z(s; x) R
( )(s)f(
(s))) [
2
ds
for any t 0andx R
n
. As far as R
( )(t)f(
(t)) : t 0 is a continuous and

bounded function on [0, ) we obtain that
_
t
0
(exps) [ R
()(s)f((s)) [
2
ds C
, t 0 (1.92)
and
h
(t, x) (expt)[[ x [
2
+C
], t 0 (1.93)
where C
is a constant. In conclusion, for each < 0, [ [> sup
[ A() +A
() [,
we obtain
lim
t
[ z
(t, x) [
2
= lim
t
h
(t, x) = 0
for each x R. The above given computations can be stated as
Theorem 1.3.3. Let the vector eld f(y, ) : R
n
R
n
be given such that
(1.66) is satised. Then any < 0 satisfying [ [> sup
[ A() + A(
) [ is a
Lyapunov exponent for the continuous mapping z(t, x) : t 0verifying (1.70), where
(t) = ( y(t), (t)) : [0, ) is xed arbitrarily. In addition, let z(t, x) : t 0

be the piecewise continuous solution fullling the corresponding system with jumps
(1.76). Then lim
t
[ z
(t, x) y(t) [= lim

t
[ z
(t, x) [= 0 for each x R

n
Remark 1.3.4. The result stated in Theorem 1.3.3 make use of some bounds sup
[
A()+A(
) [=| B | associated with the unknown matrix A(), (bounded set)

R
d
. In the particular case =
1
, ...,
m
, we get a nite set of matrices A(
1
), ...A(
m
)
for which | B |= max[ A
1
+A
1
[, ..., [ A
m
+A
m
[ where A
i
= A(
i
).
An estimate of the the Theorem 1.3.3 stating that lim
t
(expt) [ z(t, x) [= 0
provided [ [= >| B | and in addition z(t, x), t 0 can be measured as contin-
uous solution of the system (1.70). This information can be used for estimating the
bounds | B |and as far as we get lim
t
(exp
t) [ z(t, x) [= 0
for some < 0. We may predict that | B |<[ [. On the other hand ,if we are able
to measure only some projections
i
(t, x) =, i 1, 2, .., m of the solution z(t, x) : t 0 satisfying (1.70)
then (t, x) = (
1
(t, x), ...
m
(t, x)) fulls the following linear equation
_
_
_
d(t,x)
dt
= D((t))(t, x) +d((t)), t 0
(0, x) =
0
(x) = (b
1
, x >, ..., b
m
, x >)
(1.94)
where D() is an (mm) continuous matrix and
d() = column(, ..., )
Here we have assumed that A
()[b
1
, ..., b
m
] = [b
1
, ..., b
m
]D
() and (1.3.3) gets the

corresponding version when (1.93) replaces the original system (1.70)
1.4 Nonlinear Systems of Dierential Equations
Let f(x, , y) : I G R
n
be a continuous function,where I(interval) R and
R
m
are some open sets. Consider a system of dierential equations(normal form)
dy
dx
= f(x, , y) (1.95)
1.4. NONLINEAR SYSTEMS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 21
By a solution of (1.94) we mean a continuous function y(x, ) : J G which is
continuously derivable with respect to x J such that
dy(x, )
dx
= f(x, , y(x, )), x J,
where J I is an interval and is a compact set. The Cauchy problem for
the nonlinear system (1.94) C.P(f; x
0
, y
0
), has the meaning that we must determine
a solution of (1)y(x, ) : J G which satises y(x
0
, ) = y
0
, ,where
x
0
Iand y
0
G are xed. To get a unique C.P(f; x
0
, y
0
) solution we need to
replace the continuity property of f by a Lipschitz condition with respect to y G
Denition 1.4.1. We say that a continuous function f(x, , y) : I G R
n
is locally Lipschitz continuous with respect to y G if for each compact set W =
J
K I G there exists a constant L(W) > 0 such that[ f(x, , y
)
f(x, , y
) L [ y
[, y
, y
K, x J,
Denition 1.4.2. We say that a C.P(f; x
0
, y
0
) solution y(x; ) : x J,

is
unique if for any other solution y
1
(x; ) : x J
1
,
1
of (1.95) which veries
y
1
(x
0
) = y
0
,we get y(x, ) = y
1
(x, ), (x, ) (J
(J
1
1
).Denote B(y
0
, b)
R
n
the ball centered at y
0
R
n
whose radius is b > 0
Remark 1.4.3. By a straight computation we get that if the right hand side of (1.94)
is continuously dierentiable function with respect to y G, i.e
f
y
i
(x, , y) : I G R
n
, i 1, ..., n
are continuous functions and G is a convex domain then f is locally Lipschitz with
respect to y G
1.4.1 Existence and Uniqueness of C.P(f, x
0
, y
0
)
Theorem 1.4.4. (Cauchy Lipschitz) Let the continuous function f(x; , y) : I
G R
n
be locally Lipschitz continuous with respect to y G, where I R,
R
m
, G R
n
are open sets.For some x
0
I, y
0
G and (compact) xed, we
take a, b > 0 such that I
a
(x
0
) = [x
0
a, x
0
+a] Iand B(y
0
, b) G. Let M = max[
f(x, , y) [: x I
a
(x
0
), , y B(y
0
, b). Then there exist > 0, = min(a,
b
M
)
and a unique C.P (f; x
0
, y
0
) solution y(x, ) : I
(x
0
) B(y
0
, b) of (1.95).
Proof. We associate the corresponding integral equation (as in the linear case)
y(x, ) = y
0
+
_
x
x0
f(t, , y(t, ))dt, x I
a
(x
0
), (1.96)
where I
a
(x
0
) I and (compact) are xed. By a direct inspection, we see
that the two systems (1.94) and (1.95) are equivalent using their solutions and the
existence of solution for (1.94) with y(x
0
) = y
0
will be obtained proving that (1.95)
has a solution.In this respect, a sequence of continuous functions y
k
(x, ) : (x, )
I
(t
0
)
k0
is constructed such that
y
0
(x, ) = y
0
, y
k+1
(x, ) = y
0
+
_
x
x0
f(t, , y
k
(t, ))dt, k 0 (1.97)
Consider = min(a,
b
M
) and I
(x
0
) = [x
0
, x
0
+]. We see easily that the sequence
y
k
(.)
k0
constructed in (1.96) is uniformly bounded if the variable x is restricted
to x I
(x
0
) I
a
(x
0
). More precisely
y
k
(x, ) B(y
0
, b), (x, ) I
(x
0
) , k 0 (1.98)
It will be proved by induction and assuming that (1.97) is satised for k 0 we
compute
[ y
k+1
(x, ) y
0
[
_
x0+|xx0|
x0
f(t, , y
k
(t, ))dt M b (1.99)
for any (x, ) I
(x
0
) . Next step is to notice that y
k
(x, ) : (x, ) I
(x
0
)
k0
is a Cauchy sequence in a Banach space C(I
(x
0
))
j
R
n
and it is implied by
the following estimates
[ y
k+1
(x, ) y
k
(x, ) [ bL
k
[ x x
0
[
k
k!
, (x, ) I
(x
0
) , k 0 (1.100)
where L = L(W) > 0 is a Lipschitz constant associated with f and W = I
(x
0
)
B(y
0
, b), a compact set of IG. A verication of (1.99) uses the standard induction
argument and for k = 0 they are proved in (1.98). Assuming (1.99) for k we compute
[ y
k+2
(x, ) y
k+1
(x, ) [
_
x0+|xx0|
x0
[ f(t, , y
k+1
(t, )) f(t, , y
k
(t, )) [ dt
L
_
x0+|xx0|
x0
[ y
k+1
(t, ) y
k
(t, ) [ dt L
k+1
|xx0|
k+1
k+1!
and (1.99) is veried.Rewrite
(1.99)
y
k+1
(x, ) = y
0
+ (y
1
(x, ) y
0
) +..., +y
k+1
(x, ) y
k
(x, ) =
= y
0
+
k+1
j=0
u
j
(x, ), where u
j
= y
j+1
y
j
and consider the following series of continuous functions
S(x, ) = y
0
+
j=0
u
j
(x, ) (1.101)
The series (1.100) is convergent in the Banach space C(I
(x
0
); R
n
) if it is bounded
by a numerical convergent series and notice that each u
j
(x, ) : (x, ) I
(x
0
)
of (1.100) satises (see(1.99))
[ u
j
(x, ) [ b
L
j
[ x x
0
[
j
j!
b
L.
j
j!
, j 0 (1.102)
In conclusion, the series S(x, ) given in 1.101 is bounded by the following series
u =[ y
0
[ +b(1 +
L
1
+... +
L
k
k!
+...) =[ y
0
[ +b expL
and the sequence of continuous functions
y
k
(x, ) : (x, ) I
(x
0
)
k
0
constructed in (1.96) is uniformly convergent to a continuous function
y(x, ) = lim
k
y
k
(x, ) uniformly on (x, ) I
(x
0
) (1.103)
It allows to pass k into integral equation (1.96) and we get
y(x, ) = y
0
+
_
x
x0
f(t, , y(t, ))dt, (x, ) I
(x
0
) (1.104)
which proves the existence of the C.P(f; x
0
, y
0
) solution.
Uniqueness. Let y
1
(x, ) : J
1
1
Ganother solution of (1.94) satisfying y
1
(x
0
) =
y
0
, where J
1
(compact set) I and
1
(compact) . Dene a compact set K
1
G
such that it contains all values of the continuous function
y
1
(x, ) : (x, ) J
1

1
K
1
Denote
K = B(y
0
, b) K
1
,

J = I
(x
0
) J
1
,
=
1
and let
L = L(

K) > 0
be the corresponding Lipschitz constant associated with f and compact set

W =

K.We have

J = [x
0

1
, x
0
+
2
] for some
i
0 and
[ y(x, ) y
1
(x, ) [

L
_
x0+|xx0|
x0
[ y(t, ) y
1
(t, ) [ dt, (x, )

J
(1.105)
For

xed,denote (x) =[ y(x, ) y
1
(x, ) [ and inequality (1.105) becomes

L
_
t
x0
(s)ds, t [x
0
, x
0
+
2
] (1.106)
which shows that (t) = 0, t [x
0
, x
0
+
2
](see Gronwall Lemma in (1.1.1))
Similarly we get (t) = 0, t [x
0

1
, x
0
]
and (t) = 0 t

J, lead us to the conclusion y(x, ) = y
1
(x, ), x

J and for an
arbitrary xed

. The proof is complete.
Remark 1.4.5. The local Lipschitz continuity of the function f is essential for getting
uniqueness of a C.P solution. Assuming that f is only a continuous function of
y G,we can construct examples supporting the idea that a C.P solution is not
unique. In this respect, consider the scalar function f(y) = 2
_
[ y [, y R and the
equation
dy(t)
dt
= 2
_
[ y(t) [ with y(0) = 0. There are two C.P solution.y
1
(t) = 0, t 0
and y
2
(t) = t
2
, t 0 where a continuous but not a Lipschitz continuous function was
used.
Comment. There is a general xed point theorem which can be used for proving
the existence and uniqueness of a Cauchy problem solution .In this respect we shall
recall so called xed point theorem associated with contractive mappings. Let T :
X Xbe a continuous mapping satisfying
(Tx, Ty) (x, y) for any x, y X
where 0 < < 1 is a constant and (X, ) is a complete metric space. A xed point
for the mapping T satises T x = x and it can be obtained as a limit point of the
following Cauchy sequence x
n
n0
dened by x
n+1
= Tx
n
, n 0. By denition we
get (x
k+1
, x
k
) = (Tx
k
, Tx
k1
) (x
k
, x
k1
)
k
(x
1
, x
0
) for any k 1 and
(Tx
k+m
, Tx
k
)
m
j=1
(x
k+j
, x
k+j1
) (
m
j=1
k+j1
)(x
1
, x
0
), where
k=0
k
=
1
1
and x
n
n1
is Cauchy sequence.
1.4.2 Dierentiability of Solutions with Respect to
Parameters
In Theorem 1.4.4we have obtained the continuity property of the C.P(f, x
0
, y
0
) solu-
tion with respect to parameters satisfying a dierential system. Assume that
the continuous function f(x, , y) : I G R
n
is continuously dierentiable with
respect y G and i.e there exist continuous partial derivatives
f(x, , y)
y
,
f(x, , y)
j
: I G R
n
, i 1, ..., n, j 1, ..., m (1.107)
where R
m
, G R
n
are open sets.
Remark 1.4.6. The assumption (1.107) leads us directly to the local Lipschitz prop-
erty of f with respect to y G. In addition, let y(x, ) : I
(x
0
) B(y
0
, b) be the
C.P(f; x
0
, y
0
) solution and dene
F(x, z(x)) = f(x, , y(x, )), z(x) = (, y(x, )) for each x I
(x
0
). Using (1.107)
we get that F(x, z(x)) satises the following dierentiability property
F(x, z
(x) F(x, z
(x))) =
f(x,
, y(x,
))
y
[y(x,
) y(x,
)]
+
m
j=1
f(x,
, y(x,
))(
j
)
j
+(x,
)([ y(x,
)
y(x,
) [ + [
[) (1.108)
where
lim
(x,
) = 0
uniformly with respect to x I
(x
0
). To get (1.108) we rewrite F(x, z
(x))
F(x, z
(x)) as follows
F(x, z
(x)) F(x, z
(x)) =
_
1
0
[
dh
d
(x, )]d
where
h(x, ) = F(x, z
(x) +(z
(x) z
(x)), [0, 1], x I
(x
0
)
The computation of the derivatives allows to see easily that (1.108) is valid. In ad-
dition using the assumption (1.107)we obtain the Lipschitz continuity of the solution
y(t, ) :
and
[ y(x,
) y(x,
) [ C [
[, x I
(x
0
),
B(
0
, ) = (1.109)
where C > 0 is a constant. The property (1.109) is obtained applying lemma Gronwall
for the integral inequality associated with the equation
y(x,
) y(x,
) =
_
x
0
[F(t, z
(t)) F(t, z
(t))]dt, x I
(x
0
)
where F(x, z(x)) fulls (1.108).
Theorem 1.4.7. (dierentiability of a solution)
Let f(x, , y) : I G R
n
be given such that (1.107)is satised. Letx
0
I, y
0

G,
0
be xed and dene a, b, > 0 such that I
a
(x
0
) I, B(y
0
, b) G,
=
B(
0
, ) . Then there exist > 0 and y(x, ) : I
(x
0
)
B(y
0
, b) as
a unique C.P(f, x
0
, y
0
) solution for (1.94) such that for each

int there exist
y(x,
)
j
= y
j
(x), x I
(x
0
), j 1, ..., m,satisfying the following linear system
dz
dx
=
f(x,
, y(x,
))
y
z +
f(x,
, y(x,
))
j
, z(x
0
) = 0 (1.110)
x I
(x
0
) = [x
0
, x
0
+] for each j 1, ..., m.
Proof. By hypothesis, the conditions of Theorem 1.4.4 are fullled and let y(x, ) :
I
(x
0
) B(y
0
, b) be the unique solution of (1.94) satisfying y(x
0
, ) = y
0
, .
Consider

int and notice that dierentiability of the solution with respect to
parameters at =
is equivalent to showing
lim
0
E
j
(x) = 0, x I
(x
0
), j 1, ..., m (1.111)
whereE
j
(x) is dened by (e
1
, ..., e
m
is canonical basis for R
m
)
E
j
(x) =
1
[y(x,
+e
j
) y(x,
) y
j
(x)], ,= 0 (1.112)
and y
j
(x), x I
(x
0
), is the unique solution of (1.110). Using remark 1.4.6 for
+e
g
,
we get
E
j
(x) =
_
x
x0
f
y
(t,
, y(t,
))E
j
(x)dt +
+
_
x
x0
((t,
+e
j
)
1
[ y(t,
+e
j
y(t,
) [ +1dt (1.113)
Denote M
1
= C +1, where
1
[ y(t,
+e
j
) y(t,
)) [ C and let L > 0 be such that

[
f(t,
,y(t,
))
y
[ Lt I
(x
0
). Then the following integral inequality is valid
[ E
j
(x) [ L
_
x0+|xx0|
x0
E
j
(x) [ dt +M
1
_
x0+
x0
[ (t,
+e
j
,
) [ dt, x I
(x
0
)
(1.114)
Applying Lemma Gronwall, from (1.114) we obtain
[ E
j
r
(x) [ M
1
(
_
x0+
x0
[ (t,
+e
j
,
) [ dt)expL (1.115)
Using lim
0
(t,
+e
j
,
) = 0 uniformly of t I
(x
0
) (see(1.108)) and passing 0
into (1.115) we obtain
lim
r0
E
j
(x) = 0, x I
(x
0
), j 1, ..., m (1.116)
The proof is complete.
1.4.3 The Local Flow(Dierentiability Properties)
Consider a continuous function g(x, z) : I G R
n
, where I R and G R
n
are
open sets. Dene a new nonlinear system of dierential equations
dz
dx
= g(x, z), z(x
0
) = B(z
0
, ) G, where x
0
I, z
0
G (1.117)
are xed and B(z
0
, ) is a variable Cauchy condition. Assume
there exist continuous partial derivatives
g(x, z)
z
i
: I G R
n
i 1, ..., n (1.118)
The unique solution of (1.117), z(x, ) : I
(x
0
) B(z
0
, ) G satisfying z(x
0
, ) =
B(z
0
, ) R
n
will be called the local ow associated with the vector eld g
satisfying (1.118).
Theorem 1.4.8. (dierentiability of local ow) Consider that the vector eld g
C(I G; R
n
) satises the assumption (1.118). Then there exist > 0 and a con-
tinuously dierentiable local ow z(x, ) : I
(x
0
) B(z
0
, ) G of g fullling the
following properties
for each
int B(z
0
, ) there exists a nonsingular (n n)matrix (1.119)
Z(x) =
z(x,
, x I
(x
0
), satisfying
_
d
Z(x)
dx
=
g(x,z(x,))
z
Z(x), x I
(x
0
)
Z(x
0
) = I
n
Proof. For z
0
G xed dene = z G :[ z z
0
[< + = intB(z
0
, +), where
> 0 is suciently small such that G. Associate a new vector eld depending
on parameter
f(x, , y) = g(x, y +), x I, , y

G = GB(z
0
, +) (1.120)
Let b > 0 be such that B(0, b)

G and B(z
0
, + +b) G. Notice that according to
(1.118) we get a smooth vector eld f with respect to (, y)
G and the following

system of dierential equation with parameters = (
1
, ...,
n
)
dy
dx
= f(x, , y), y(x
0
) = 0, y

G R
n
(1.121)
satises the dierentiability conditions of the Theorem 1.4.7. Let y(x, ) : I
(x
0
)
B(z
0
, ) B(0, b)

G be the unique solution of (1.121) which is continuously
dierentiable on (x, ) I
(x
0
) intB(z
0
, ) and y
j
(x) =
y(x,
)
y
, x I
(x
0
),

intB(z
0
, ),fulls
_
du
dx
=
f(x,
,y(x,
))
y
u +
f(x,
,y(x,
))
j
, u R
n
, x I
(x
0
)
u(x
0
) = 0
(1.122)
for each j 1, .., n. Then z(x, ) = y(x, ) +, x I
(x
0
), B(z
0
, ), is the unique
continuously dierentiable solution of the nonlinear system (1.117) with z(x
0
, ) =
and
Z(x) =
z(x,
=
y(x,
+I
n
, x I
(x
0
),
intB(z
0
, ) (1.123)
where

Y (x) =
y(x,
veries the following system

_
d
Y (x)
dx
=
f(x,
,y(x,
))
y
Y (x) +
f(x,
,y(x,
))
, x I
(x
0
)
Y (x
0
) = null matrix
(1.124)
Using (1.123) and (1.124) we see easily that

Z(x
0
) = I
n
and
d
Z(x)
dx
=
d[
Y (x)]
dx
=
g(x, z(x,
))
z
[
Z(x) I
n
] +
g(x, z(x,
))
z
=
g(x, z(x,
))
z
Z(x), x I
(x
0
) (1.125)
The matrix satisfying (1.125) is a nonsingular one(see Liouville theorem) and the
proof is complete.
Remark 1.4.9. Consider the nonsingular matrix

Z(x), x I
(x
0
) given in the above
theorem and dene

H(x) = [
Z(x)]
1
, x I
(x
0
). Then

H(x), x I
(x
0
) satises the
following linear matrix system
_
d
H(x)
dx
=
H(x)
g(x,z(x,
))
z
, x I
(x
0
)
H(x
0
) = I
n
(1.126)
It can be proved by computing the derivative
d[
H(x)
Z(x)]
dx
= [
d
H(x)
dx
]
Z(x) +

H(x)[
dZ
dx
] = 0, x I
(x
0
)
Exercise(dierentiability with respect to x
0
I)
Let g(x, z) : I G R
n
be continuously dierentiable mapping with respect to
z G.Let x
0
I, z
0
G and > 0 be xed such that I
(x
0
) = [x
0
, x
0
+] I.
Then there exist > 0 and a continuously dierentiable mapping z(x; s) : I
(s)
I
(x
0
) G satisfying
_
dz(x;s)
dx
= g(x, z(x; s)), x I
(s) = [s , s +]
z(s; s) = z
0
, for eachs I
(x
0
)
(1.127)
and z(x) =
z(x,s)
s
, x I
( s) (for s intI
(x
0
)) fullls the following linear system
d z(x)
dx
=
g(x, z(x, s))
s
z(x), x I
( s), z( s) = g( s, z
0
) (1.128)
Hint. A system with parameters is associated as in Theorem 1.4.8 and it lead us to
a solution
z(x, s) : I
(s) I
(x
0
) B(z
0
, b) G
of the following integral equation
z(x, s) = z
0
+
_
x
s
g(t, z(t, s))dt, x I
(s), s I
(x
0
)
Take s intI
(x
0
) and using a similar computation given in Theorem 1.4.7 we get
lim
0
E
(x) = 0, x I
( s), where
E
(x) =
1
[z(x, s +) z(x, s) z(x)], ,= 0

1.4.4 Applications(Using Dierentiability of a Flow)
(a) The local ow z(x, ) : I
(x
0
) B(z
0
, ) R
n
dened in Theorem 1.4.7 preserve
the volume of any bounded domain D B(z
0
, ) for
D provided Tr
g(x,z(x,
))
z
=
n
i=1
gi(x,z(x,
))
zi
= 0, x I
(x
0
),
D. In this respect, denote D(x) = y R

n
, y =
z(x,
),
D, x I
(x
0
) and notice that D(x
0
) = D. Using multiple integrals we
compute volD(x) =
_
...
_
dy
1
...dy
n
which reduces to
D(x) =
_
...
_
[ det
z(x,
[ d
1
...d
n
Using Liouville theorem and Tr
g(x,z(x,
))
z
= 0, x I
(x
0
),
D, we obtain
det
z(x,
= 1 for any x I
(x
0
),
D, where
z(x,
, x I
(x
0
)
satises the linear system (1.119). As a result,det]
z(x,
] = 1, x I
(x
0
) and
D,
which proves that volD(x) = volD, x I
(x
0
)
(b) The linear system (1.119) given in Theorem 1.4.8 is called the linearized system
associated with (1.117).
If g(x, z) = g(z) such that g(z) satises a linear growth condition
[ g(z) [ C(1+ [ z [), z R
n
(1.129)
where C > 0 is a constant ,then the unique solution z(x, ), B(z
0
, ) verifying
dz
dx
(x, ) = g(z(x, )), z(0) = (1.130)
can be extended to the entire half line x [0, ).
In addition, if g(z
0
) = 0(z
0
is a stationary point)then the asymptotic behaviour of
z(x, ) for x and B(z
0
, ) can be obtained analyzing the corresponding
linear constant coecients system
dz
dx
=
g(z
0
)
z
z, z(0) = (1.131)
It will be assuming that
A =
g(z
0
)
z
is a Hurwitz matrix i.e (1.132)
any (A)(P() = det(A I
n
) = 0) satises Re < 0, which implies [ expAx [
M[exp wx] for some M > 0, w > 0.
We say that the nonlinear system (1.130) is locally asymptotically stable around the
stationary solution z
0
(or z
0
is locally asymptotically stable)if there exist > 0 such
that
lim
x
z(x, ) = 0, B(z
0
, ) (1.133)
There is a classical result connecting (1.132) and (1.133).
Theorem 1.4.10. (Poincare-Lyapunov) Assume that the n n matrix A is Hurwitz
such that
[ expAx [ M(exp wx), x [0, )
for some constant M > 0, w > 0. Let f(y) : R
n
R
n
be a local Lipschitz
continuous function such that is an open set and [ f(y) [ L [ y [, y (0 ),
where L > 0 is a constant. If LM w < 0,then y = 0 is asymptotically stable for the
perturbed system
dy
dx
= Ay +f(y), y , y(0) = B(0, ) (1.134)
Here the unique solution y(x, ) : x 0 of(40) fulls lim
x
y(x, ) = 0 for each
B(0, ) provided =

2M
and B(0, ) .
Proof. Let be xed and consider the unique solution y(x, ) : x [0, T]
satisfying (1.134). Notice that if is suciently small then y(x, ) : x [0, T],can
be extended to the entire half line x [0, ). In this respect, using the constant
variation formula for x [0, T] and b(x) = f(y(x, )) we get y(x, ) = (expAx) +
_
x
0
(exp(x t)A)f(y(t, ))dt,for any x [0, T]. Using the above given representation
we see easily the following estimation
[ y(x, ) [[ expAx [[ [ +
_
x
0
[ exp(x t)A [[ f(y(t, )) [ dt
[ [ M(exp wx) +
_
x
0
LM(exp w(x t)) [ y(t, ) [ dtfor anyx [0, T]
Multiplying by (expwx) > 0, we obtain
(expwx) [ y(x, [) [ [ M +
_
x
0
LM(expwt) [ y(t, [)dt, x [0, T]
and applying Gronwall Lemma for (x) = (expwx) [ y(x, ) [ we get (x) [ [
M(expLMx) for any x [0, T]. Take > 0 and =

2M
such that B(0, ) .
It implies [ y(x, ) [

2
for anyx [0, T] if [ [ . In addition, [ y(T, ) [
2
exp(T), where = w LM > 0 and choosing T > 0 suciently large such that
Mexp T 1 we may extend the solution y(x, ), x [0, T] for x [0, 2T] such
that
[ y(2T, ) [=[ y(2T, y(T, )) [ M [ y(T, ) [ exp T (
2
)
and
[ y(x, y(T, )) [ M [ y(T, ) [ exp(LM w)x

2
for any x [T, 2T]. It shows that y(x, ) can be extended to the entire half line
x [0, ) if [ [ =

2M
and > 0 satises B(0, )
In addition the inequality established for x [0, T] is preserved for the extended
solution and [ y(x, ) [[ [ Mexp(LMw)x

2
exp(LMw)x, for any x [0, ),
if [ [ =

2
. Passing to the limit x , from the last inequality we get
lim
x
[ y(x, ) [= 0 uniformly with respect to [ and the proof is complete.
The following is a direct consequence of the above theorem.
Remark 1.4.11. Let A be n n Hurwitz matrix and f(y) : (open) R
n
R
n
is
a local Lipschitz continuous function where 0 . If [ f(y) [ ([ y [), y ,where
([ y [) : [0, ) [0, ) satises lim
0
()
= 0. Then the unique solution of the

system
dy
dx
= Ay +f(y), y(0) = B(0, ), x 0
is a asymptotically stable( lim
x
[ y(x, [= 0)) if > 0 is suciently small.
Proof. Let M 1 and w > 0 such that [ expAx [ M(expwx). Consider L > 0 such
that LM w < 0 and > 0 with the property (r) Lr for any r [0, ]. Dene
= y ; [ y [< . Notice that g(y) = Ay + f(y), y

, satises the assumption of
Poincare-Lyapunov theorem which allows to get the conclusion.
We are in position to mention those sucient conditions which implies that the
stationary solution z
0
R
n
of the system
dz
dx
= g(z), g(z
0
) = 0 (1.135)
is asymptotically stable.Let g(z) : D(open) R
n
R
n
be given such that g(z
0
) = 0
and
(i) g(z) : D R
n
is continuously dierentiable.
(ii) The matrix
g(z0)
z
= A is Hurwitz.
Under the hypothesis (i) and (ii) we rewrite
g(y) = Ay +f(y), wherey = z z
0
andf(y) = g(z
0
+y) g(z
0
)
Consider the linear system
dy
dx
= Ay +f(y), y y R
n
:[ y [< =
where > 0 is taken such that z
0
+ D. Using (i) we get that f is locally Lipschitz
continuous on and the assumptions of the above given remark are satised. We see
easily that
f(y) =
_
1
0
[
g(z
0
+y)
z

g(z
0
)
z
]yd, y
and
[ f(y) [ ([ y [) = (
_
1
0
h(, [ y [)d) [ y [, y
Here h(, [ y [) = max
|w||y|
[
g(z0+w)
z

g(z0)
z
[ satises
lim
|y|0
h(, [ y [) = 0 uniformly on [0, 1] and lim
0
()
= 0 therefore, the assumptions

of the above given remark are satised when considering the nonlinear system (1.135)
and the conclusion will be stated as
Proposition 1.4.12. Let g(z) : D R
n
R
n
be a continuous function and z
0
D
xed such that g(z
0
) = 0. Assume that the condition (i) and (ii) are fullled. Then
the stationary solution z = z
0
of the system (1.135) is asymptotically stable, i.e
lim
x
[ z(x, ) z
0
[= 0 for any [ z
0
[ , if > 0 is suciently small,where
z(x, ) : x 0 is the unique solution of (1.135) with z(0, ) =
Problem. Prove Poincare-Lyapunov theorem replacing Hurwitz property of the ma-
trix A with (A +A
) =
1
, ...
d
where
i
< 0, i 1, ..., d.
Comment(on global existence of a solution)
Theorem 1.4.13. (global existence)Let g(x, z) : [0, ) R
n
R
n
be a continuous
function which is locally Lipschitz continuous with respect to z R
n
. Assume that
for each T > 0 there exists C
T
> 0 such that
[ g(x, z) [ C
T
(1+ [ z [), x [0, T], z R
n
Then the unique C.P(g; 0, z
0
) solution z(x, z
0
) satisfying
dz(x;z0)
dx
= g(x, z(x, z
0
)), z(0, z
0
) = z
0
, is dened for any x [0, ).
Proof. (sketch)It is used the associated integral equation
z(x, z
0
) = z
0
+
_
x
0
g(t, z(t, z
0
))dt, x [0, KT]
1.5. GRADIENT SYSTEMS OF VECTOR FIELDS AND SOLUTIONS 33
and the corresponding Cauchy sequence allows to get a unique solution
z
k
(x, z
0
) : x [0, KT] for each K 1. The global solution will be dened as an
inductive limit

Z(z, z
0
) : [0, ) R
n
,

Z(z, z
0
) = Z
k
(x, z
0
), if x [0, KT], for each
k 0.
1.5 Gradient Systems of Vector Fields and their So-
lutions; Frobenius Theorem
Denition 1.5.1. Let X
j
(p; y) R
n
for p = (t
1
, ..., t
m
) D
m
=
m
1
(a
i
, a
i
), y
V R
n
be continuously dierentiable (X
j
(
1
(D
m
V ; R
n
)) for j 1, ..., m.
We say that X
1
(p; y), ..., X
m
(p; y) denes a gradient system of vector elds(or fulls
the Frobenius integrability condition) if
Xj
ti
(p; y)
Xi
tj
(p; y) = [X
i
(p; .), X
j
(p; .)](y)i, j 1, ..., m, where [Z
1
, Z
2
](y) =
Z1(y)
y
Z
2
(y)
Z2(y)
y
Z
1
(y)(Lie bracket).
1.5.1 The Gradient System Associated with a Finite Set of
Vector Fields
Theorem 1.5.2. Let Y
j
(
2
(R
n
, R
n
), x
0
R
n
, j 1, ..., m be xed .Then there
exist D
m
=
m
1
(a
i
, a
i
), V (x
0
) R
n
and X
j
(p; y) R
n
X
j
(
1
(D
j1
V ; R
n
), j 1, ..., m, X
1
(p
1
; y) = Y
1
(y),such that
y
t
1
= Y
1
(y),
y
t
2
= X
2
(t
1
; y), ...,
y
t
m
= X
m
(t
1
, ..., t
m1
; y) (1.136)
is a gradient system (
Xj (pj;y)
ti
= [X
i
(p
i
; .), X
j
(p
j
, .)](y), i < j) and
G(p; x) = G
1
(t) ... G
m
(t
m
(x)), p = (t
1
, ..., t
m
) D
m
, x V (x
0
) (1.137)
is the solution for (1.136) satisfying Cauchy condition y(0) = x V (x
0
). Here
G
j
(t; x) is the local ow generated by the vector eld Y
j
, j 1, ..., m.
Proof. We shall use the standard induction argument and for m = 1 we notice that
the equations (1.136) and (1.137) express the existence and uniqueness of a local
ow associated with a nonlinear system of dierential equation (see Theorem 1.4.8).
Assume that for (m 1) given vector elds Y
j
(
2
(R
n
, R
n
) the conclusions (1.136)
and (1.137) are satised,i.e there exist
X
2
( y) = Y
2
,
X
3
(t
2
, y), ...,
X
m
(t
2
, ..., t
m1
; y) (1.138)
continuously dierentiable with respect to
p = (t
2
, ..., t
m
)
m
2
(a
i
, a
i
) and y

V (x
0
) R
n
such that
y
t
2
= Y
2
(y),
y
t
3
=

X
3
(t
2
; y), ...,
y
t
m
=

X
m
(t
2
, ..., t
m1
; y) (1.139)
satisfying Cauchy condition y(0) = x

V (x
0
). Recalling that (1.139) is a gradient
system we notice
X
j
( p; y)
t
i
= [
X
i
( p
i
, .),
X
j
( p
j
; .)](y), 2 i < j = 3, ..., m (1.140)
where p
i
= (t
2
, ..., t
i1
) Let vector elds Y
j
(
2
(R
n
, R
n
), j 1, ..., m and denote
y = G(p; x) = G
1
(t
1
)

G( p; x), p = (t
1
, p)
m
1
(a
i
, a
i
), x V (x
0
)

V (x
0
) (1.141)
where G
1
(t)(x) is the local ow generated by Y
1
and

G( p, x) is dened in (1.138).
By denition
G(p;y)
t1
= Y
1
(G(p; x)) and to prove that y = G(p; x) dened in (1.141)
fulls a gradient system we write G
1
(t
1
; y) =

G( p; x) for y = G(p; x).A straight
computation shows
G
1
(t
1
; y)
y
y
t
j
=

G( p; y)
t
j
, forj = 2, ..., m (1.142)
which is equivalent with writing
y
tj
= H
1
(t
1
; y)
X
j
( p
j
; G
1
(t
1
; y)), j = 2, ..., m.
Here the matrix H
1
(; y) = [
G1(;y)
y
]
1
satises
dH1
d
= H
1
Y1
x
(G
1
(; y)), H
1
(0; y) = I
n
(see Theorem 1.4.8). Denote
X
2
(t
1
; y) = H
1
(t
1
; y)Y
2
(G
1
(t
1
; y))
X
j
(t
1
, ...j
j1
; y) = H
1
(t
1
; y)
X
j
(t
2
, ..., t
j1
; G
1
(t
1
; y)), j = 3, ..., m
for y V (x
0
)

V (x
0
) and p = (t
1
, ..., t
m
)
m
1
(a
i
, a
i
). With these notations, the
system (1.142) is written as follows
y
t
1
= Y
1
(y),
y
t
2
= X
2
(t
1
; y), ...
y
t
m
= X
m
(t
1
, ..., t
m1
; y) (1.143)
and to prove that (1.143) stands for a gradient system we need to show that
X
j
t
i
(p
j
; y) = [X
i
(p
i
, .), X
j
(p
j
, .)](y), 1 i < j = 2, ..., m (1.144)
For j = 2 by direct computation we obtain
X
2
t
1
(t
1
; y) = H
1
(t
1
; y)[Y
1
, Y
2
](G(t
1
; y)) (1.145)
and assuming that we know (see the exercise which follows)
H
1
(t
1
; y)[Y
1
, Y
2
](G
1
(t
1
, y)) = [H
1
(t
1
; .)Y
1
(G
1
(t
1
; .)), H
1
(t
1
; .)Y
2
(G
1
(t
1
; .))](y)
= [Y
1
(.), X
2
(t
1
; .)](y) (1.146)
we get
X
2
t
1
(t
1
; y) = [Y
1
(.), X
2
(t
1
; .)](y) (1.147)
The equation (1.147) stands for (1.144) when i = 1and j = 2, 3, ...m. It remains to
show (1.144) for j = 3, ..., m and 2 i < j. Using (1.140) and
Xj
ti
(p
j
; y) = H
1
(t
1
; y)
Xj
ti
( p
j
; G
1
(t
1
; y)),
we obtain
X
j
t
i
(p
j
; y) = H
1
(t
1
; y)[
X
i
( p
i
; .),
X
j
( p
j
; .)](G
1
(t
1
; y)) (1.148)
if 2 i < i < j = 3, ..., m. The right side in (1.148) is similar to that in (1.144) and
the same argument used above applied to (1.148) allow one to write
X
j
t
i
(p
j
; y) = [X
i
(p
i
; .), X
j
(p
j
; .)](y) (1.149)
for any 2 i < j = 3, ..., m, and the proof is complete.
Exercise 1. Let X, Y
1
, Y
2
(
2
(R
n
, R
n
) and consider the local ow G(; x),
(a, a), x V (x
0
) R
n
,and the matrix H(; x) = [
G
x
(; x)]
1
determined by the
vector eld X(see Theorem 1.4.8). Then
H(t; x)[Y
1
, Y
2
](G(t; x)) == [H(t; .)Y
1
(G(t; .)), H(t; .)Y
2
(g(t; .))](x)
for any t (a, a), x V (x
0
) R
n
.
Solution. The Lie bracket in the right hand side of the conclusion is computed using
H(t; y) =
G
x
(t; G(t; y)) and using the symmetry of the matrices
Gi
x
2
(t; x), i
1, ..., n,
we get the conclusion, where G = (G
1
, ..., G
n
).
Exercise 2. Under the same conditions as in Exercise 1, prove that
H(t; y)Y
1
(G(t; y)) = Y
1
(y), providedX = Y
1
Solution. By denition H(0; y) = I
n
and
X
1
(t; y) = H(t; y)Y
1
(G(t; y))
satises X
1
(0; y) = Y
1
(y). In addition, applying the standard derivation of X
1
(t; y)
we get
d
dt
X
1
(t; y) = 0 which shows X
1
(t; y) = Y
1
(y), t (a, a) and the verication
is complete.
1.5.2 Frobenius Theorem
Let X
j
(
2
(R
n
, R
n
), j 1, ..., m be given and consider the following system of
dierential equations
y
t
j
= X
j
(y), j = 1, ..., m, y(0) = x V R
n
(1.150)
Denition 1.5.3. A solution for (1.150) means a function
G(p; x) : D
m
V R
n
of class (
2
(G (
2
(D
m
V ; R
n
)) fullling (1.136) for
any p = (t
1
, ..., t
m
) D
m
=
m
1
(a
i
, a
i
) and x V (openset) R
n
. The system
(1.150) is completely integrable on (openset) R
n
if for any x
0
there exists a
neighborhood V (x
0
) and a unique solution G(p; x), (p; x) D
m
V (x
0
) of (1.150)
fullling G(0; x) = x V (x
0
)
Theorem 1.5.4. (Frobenius theorem) Let X
j
(
2
(R
n
,
n
), j 1, ..., m be given.
Then the system (1.150) is completely integrable on
(open set) R
n
iff[Y
i
, Y
j
](x) = 0
for any i, j 1, ..., m, x , where [Y
i
, Y
j
] = Lie bracket. In addition, any local
solution y = G(p; x), (p, x) D
m
V (x
0
) is given by
G(p; x) = G
1
(t
1
)...G
m
(t
m
)(x),where G
j
()(x) is the local ow generated by X
j
, j
1, ..., m.
Proof. For given Y
1
, ..., Y
m
(
2
(R
n
; R
n
) and x
0
R
n
xed we associate the
corresponding gradient system
y
t
1
= Y
1
(y),
y
t
2
=

X
2
(t
1
; y), ...,
y
t
m
=

X
m
(t
2
, ..., t
m1
; y) (1.151)
and its solution
y = G(p; x) = G
1
(t
1
) ... G
m
(t
m
)(x), p D
m
=
m
1
(a
j
, a
j
) (1.152)
satisfying G(0; x
0
) = x
0
V (x
0
)(see Theorem 1.5.2) and G(p; x) . By denition
y
tj
= X
j
(t
1
, ...t
j1
; y), j 1, ..., m, if y = G(p; x
0
) and the orbit given in (1.152) is
a solution of the system (1.150)iff
X
j
(t
1
, ...t
j1
; y) = Y
j
(y), j 2, ..., m, y V (x
0
) (1.153)
To prove (1.153) we notice that
X
2
(t
1
; y) = H
1
(t
1
; y)Y
2
(G
1
(t
1
; y)), for any y V (x
0
) (1.154)
where H
1
(t
1
; y) = [
G1
y
(t
1
; y)]
1
satises linear equation
_
dH1
d
(; y) = H
1
(; y)
Y1
y
(G
1
(; y)), (a
1
, a
1
)
H
1
(0; y) = I
n
(1.155)
(see Remark (1.4.9) ). Using (1.154) and (1.155), by a direct computation we get
_
X
2
(0; y) = Y
2
(y), y V (x
0
)
dX2(t1;y)
dt1
= H
1
(t
1
; y)[Y
1
, Y
2
](G
1
(t
1
; y))
for any y V (x
0
) , t
1
(a
1
, a
1
). In particular
X
2
(t
1
; y) = Y
2
for any y V (x
0
)i[Y
1
, Y
2
](y) = 0 for any y V (x
0
) (1.156)
A similar argument can be used for proving that
X
j
(t
1
, ..., t
j1
; y) = Y
j
(y), for any y V (x
0
), j 2 iff[Y
i
, Y
j
](y) = 0
for any 1 i j 1, y V (x
0
) (1.157)
and the conclusion of the system (1.150) implies
[Y
i
, Y
j
](y) = 0, y V (x
0
) , i, j 1, ..., m (1.158)
The reverse implication, Y
1
, ...Y
m
(
2
(R
n
, R
n
) are commuting on (open) R
n
implies that the system is completely integrable on will be proved noticing t(1.150)
hat
G
i
(t
i
) G
j
(t
j
)(y) = G
j
(t
j
) G
i
(t
i
)(y), for any i, j 1, ..., m, y V (x
0
) (1.159)
if (1.155)is assumed. Here G
j
()(y) is the local ow generated by the vector eld
Y
j
, j 1, ..., m. It remains to check that the orbit (1.152) is the unique solution of
the system (1.150) and in this respect we notice that
(; x) = G(p; x), [0, 1] (1.160)
satises the following system of ordinary dierential equations
_
d
d
(; x) =
m
j=1
t
j
Y
j
((; x)) = g(p, (; x))
(0; x) = x, p = (t
1
, ..., t
m
) D
m
(1.161)
Here g(p, y) is a locally Lipschitz continuous function with respect to y and
(; x) : [0, 1] is unique. The proof is complete.
Comment(total dierential equation and gradient system)
For a continuously dierentiable function y(p) : D
m
=
m
1
(a
k
, a
k
) R
n
dene the
corresponding dierential as follows
dy(p) =
m
j=1
y(p)
t
j
dt
j
where
p = (t
1
, ..., t
m
) D
m
LetY
1
, ..., Y
m
C
2
(R
n
, R
n
) be given and consider the following equation (using
dierentials)
dy(p) =
m
j=1
Y
j
(y(p))dt
j
, p D
m
, y(0) = x V (x
0
) R
n
. solution for the last
equation implies that
y
y
= Y
j
(y), j 1, ..., m, p = (t
1
, ..., t
m
) D
m
is a gradient system for y V (x
0
)
and it can be solved using Frobenius theorem((1.5.4)). In addition, for an analytic
function of z D C,
w(z) : D C
n
denes the corresponding dierential
dw(z) = dw
1
(x, y) +idw
2
(x, y), z = a +iy D
where w(z) = w
1
(x, y) +iw
2
(x, y)and
v(x, y) =
_
w
1
w
2
_
(x, y) : D
2
=
2
1
(a
k
, a
k
) R
2n
is an analytic function.Let
f(w) : C
n
C
n
be given analytic function and associate the following equation
(using dierentials)
dw(z) = f(w(z))dz = [f
1
(v(x, y))dx f
2
(v(x, y))dy] +
+i[f
2
(v(x, y))dx +f
2
(v(x, y))dy] where
f(w) = f
1
(v) + if
2
(v) and f
1
, f
2
are real analytic functions of v =
_
w
1
w
2
_
D
2n
=
2n
k=1
(a
k
, a
k
). To solve the last complex equation we need to show that Y
1
(v) =
_
f
1
f
2
_
(v) and Y
2
(v) =
_
f
1
f
2
_
(v)are commuting on v D
2n
which shows the
system
v
x
= Y
1
(v),
v
y
= Y
2
(v) is completely integrable on D
2
.
1.6 Appendix
(a
1
)Assuming that f(x, y) : I G R R
n
R
n
is a continuous function, Peano
proved the following existence theorem
Theorem 1.6.1. (Peano) Consider the following system of ODE
dy
dx
= f(x, y), y(x
0
) = y
0
where (x
0
, y
0
) I G
is xed and f(x, y) : (x, y) I G is a continuous function. Then there exist
an interval J I and a continuously derivable function y(x) : J G satisfying
1.6. APPENDIX 39
y(x
0
) = y
0
and
dy
dx
(x) = f(x, y(x)), x J.
Proof. It relies on Arzela-Ascoli theorem which is refering to so called compact se-
quence
y
k
(x), x D
k1
C(D; R
n
)
satisfying
(i) A boundedness condition [ y
k
(x) [ M, x D, k 0
(ii) they are equally uniformly continuous, i.e for any > 0 there exists () > 0
such that [ x
[< () implies [ y
k
(x
) y
k
(x
) [< x
, x
D, k 1
If a sequence y
k
(x) : x D
k1
satisfy (i) and (ii) then Arzela-Ascoli theorem
allows to nd a subsequence y
kj
(x) : x D
j1
which is uniformly convergent on
the compact set D. Let a > 0 and b > 0 such that I
a
= [x
0
a, x
0
+ a] I
and B(y
0
, b) G. Dene M = max[ f(x, y) [: (x, y) I
a
B(y
0
, b) and let
= min(a,
b
M
). Construct the following sequence of continuous functions
y
k
(x) = [x
0
, x
0
+] G, y
k
(x) = y
0
, forx [x
0
, x
0
+

k
]
(iii)
y
k
(x) = y
0
+
_
x
x0+
k
f(t, y
k
(t

k
)), if x [x
0
+

k
, x
0
+]for each k 1
y
k
(x) : x [x
0
, x
0
+ ] is well dened because it is constructed on the interval
[x
0
+ m
k
, x
0
+ (m + 1)
k
] using its denition on the preceding interval [x
0
+ (m
1)
k
, x
0
+m
k
]. It is easily seen thaty
k
(x) : x [x
0
, ]
k1
is uniformly bounded and
[ y
k
(x) y
0
[ M b.
In addition, [ y
k
(x
) y
k
(x
) [= 0, if x
, x
[x
0
, x
0
+

k
] and [ y
k
(x
) y
k
(x
) [ M [
x
[ if x
, x
[x
0
+

k
, x
0
+ ] which implies [ y
k
(x
) y
k
(x
) [ M [ x
[
for any x
, x
[x
0
, x
0
+], k 1.
Let y(x) : [x
0
, x
0
+ ] B(y
0
, b) G be the continuous function obtained using a
subsequencey
kj
(x) : x [x
0
, x
0
+ ]
j1
, y(x) = lim
j
y
kj
(x) uniformly with respect
to x [x
0
, x
0
+ ]. By passing j into the equation (iii) written for k = k
j
we
get
y(x) = y
0
+
_
x
x0
f(t,
y(t))dt, x [x
0
, x
0
+]
and the proof is complete.
(a
2
). Ordinary dierential equations with delay
Let > 0 be xed and consider the following system of ODE
_
dy
dx
(x) = f(x, y(x), y(x )), x [0, a]
y() = (), [, ]
(1.162)
where C([, 0]; R
n
) is xed as a continuous function(Cauchy condition),and
f(x, y, z) : I R
n
R
n
R
n
is a continuous function admitting rst order continuous
partial derivatives
yi
f(x, y, z) : I R
n
R
n
R
n
, i 1, ..., n.
The above given assumptions allow us to construct a unique local solution satisfying
(1.162) and it is done starting with the system (1.162) on the xed interval x [o, ]
_
dy
dx
= f(x, y(x), (x )), x [0, ]
y(0) = (0)
(1.163)
which satises the condition of Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem. In order to make sure that
the solution of (1.163) exists for any x [0, ] we need to assume a linear growth of
f with respect to the variable y uniformity of (x, z) in compact sets,i.e
(*)[ f(x, y, z) [ C(1+ [ y [) R
n
and (x, z) J K(compact) I R
n
,where the
constant C > 0 depends on the arbitrary xed compact J K.
Any function f satisfying
(**)f(x, y, z) = A(x, z)y + b(x, z), (x, z) I R
n
where the matrix A(x, z) M
nn
and the vector b(x, z) R
n
are continuous functions will satisfy the necessary condi-
tions to extend the solution of (1.163) on any interval [m, (m + 1)], m 0
1.6. APPENDIX 41
Exercises(Linear integrable system)
(1) Formulate Frobenius theorem ((1.5.4)). Rewrite the content of Frobenius theorem
using linear vector elds Y
i
(y) = A
i
y, where A
i
M
nn
(R), i 1, ..., n.
(2) For any matrices A, B M
nn
(R) dene the meaning of the exponential mapping
(exptad
A
)(B), where ad
A
(adjoint mapping associated with A)is the linear mapping
ad
A
: M
nn
(R) M
nn
(R), dened by ad
A
(B) = AB BA = [A, B](Lie bracket of
(A, B)).
(3) Show that (exptA)B(exp tA) = (exptad
A
)(B), for any A, B M
nn
(R),
t R where (exptad
A
) is the linear mapping dened in (2).
(4)Rewrite the gradient system ((1.5.2))when the vector elds Y
i
(y) = A
i
y, i
1, ..., m,are linear. Show that,in this case the vector elds with parameters are
the following
Y
1
(y) = A
1
y, X
2
(t
1
; y) = (expt
1
ad
A1
)(A
2
)y, ..., X
m
(t
1
, ..., t
m1
; y) = [expt
1
ad
A1

(expt
2
ad
A2
)... (expt
m1
ad
Am1
)(A
m
)]y,such that the corresponding gradient sys-
tem
y
t1
= Y
1
(y),
y
t2
= X
2
(t
1
, y), ...,
y
tm
= X
m
(t
1
, ..., t
m1
; y) has the unique solution
y(t
1
, ..., t
m
; y
0
) = (expt
1
A
1
)...(expt
m
A
m
)y
0
.
Bibliographical Comments
The entire Chapter 1 is presented with minor changes as in the [12].
Chapter 2
First Order Partial
Dierential Equation
Let D R
n
be an open set and f(y) : D R
n
is a continuous function.Consider the
following nonlinear ODE
dy
dt
= f(y) (2.1)
Denition 2.0.2. Let D
0
D be an open set. A function u(y) : D
0
R is called
rst integral for (2.1) on D
0
if
1. u is nonconstant on D
0
,
2. u is continuously dierentiable on D
0
(u (
1
(D
0
; R)),
3. for each solution y(t) : I R D
0
of the system (2.1) there exists a constant
c R such that U(y(t)) = c, t I.
Example 2.0.1. A Hamilton system is described by the following system ofODE
dp
dt
=
H
q
(p, q),
dq
dt
=
H
p
(p, q), p(0) = p
0
, q(0) = q
0
(2.2)
where H(p, q) : G
1
G
2
R
n
R
n
R is continuously dierentiable and G
i

R
n
, i 1, 2, are open sets. Let (p(t), q(t)) : t [0, T] be solution of the Hamilton
system (2.1) and by a direct computation, we get
d
dt
[H(p(t), q(t))] = 0 for any t [0, T]
43
44 CHAPTER 2. FIRST ORDER PDE
It implies H(p(t), q(t)) = H(p
0
, q
0
) t [0, T] and H(p, q) : (p, q) G
1
G
2
is a
rst integral for (2.2)
Theorem 2.0.3. Let f(y) : D R
n
be a continuous function,D
0
D an open subset
and consider a nonconstant continuously dierentiable function U (
1
(D
0
, R). Then
U(y) : y D
0
is rst integral on D
0
of ODE i the following dierential equality
<
u(y)
y
, f(y) >=
n
i=1
u
y
i
(y)f
i
(y) = 0, y D
0
(2.3)
is satised, where
f = (f
1
, ..., f
n
),
u
y
= (
u
y
1
, ...,
u
y
n
)
Proof. Let u(y) : y D
0
be a continuously dierentiable rst integral ofODE(2.1)
and consider that y(t, y
0
) : (, ) D
0
is a solution of (2.1) verifying y(0, y
0
) = y
0

D
0
. By hypothesis, u(y(t, y
0
)) = c = u(y
0
), for any t (, ) and by derivation, we
get
0 =
d
dt
[u(y(t, y
0
))] =, for any t (, ) (2.4)
In particular, for t = 0 we obtain the conclusion (2.3) for an arbitrary xed y
0
D
0
.
The reverse implication uses the equality(2.3) and dene (t) = u(y(t)), t (, )
where u (
1
(D
0
, R) fulls (2.3) and y(t) : t (, ) is a solution of (2.1). It
follows that
d
dt
(t) == 0, t (, )
and
(t) = constant, t (, )
Let R
n+1
be an open set and consider that
f(x, u) : R
n
, L(x, u) : R (2.5)
are given continuously dierentiable function, f (
1
(; R
n
), L (
1
(; R).
Denition 2.0.4. A causilinear rst order PDE is dened by the following dier-
ential equality
<
u(x)
x
, f(x, u(x)) >= L(x, u(x)), x D(open) R
n
(2.6)
where f (
1
(; R
n
), L (
1
(; R) are xed and u(x) : D R is an unknown
continuously dierentiable function such that (x, u(x)) , x D
45
A solution for (2.6) means a function u (
1
(D; R) such that (x, u(x) ) and
(2.6)is satised for any x D
Remark 2.0.5. Assuming that L(x, u) = 0 and f(x, u) = f(x) for any (x, u)
D R = then PDE dened in (2.6) stands for the dierential equality(2.3) in
Theorem 2.0.3 dening rst integral for ODE (2.1). In this case, the dierential
system (2.1)is called Cauchy characteristic system associated with linear PDE
<
u(x)
x
, f(x) >= 0, x D R
n
(2.7)
Proposition 2.0.6. Let D
0
D be an open subset and consider a nonconstant
continuously dierentiable scalar function u(x) : D
0
R. Then u(x) : x D
0
is
a solution for the linear PDE (2.7) i u(x) : x D
0
is a rst integral for ODE
(2.1) on D
0
.
Denition 2.0.7. Let a D R
n
be xed and consider m rst integrals
u
1
(y), ..., u
m
(y) : y V (a) D for ODE (2.1) which are continuously dierentiable
where V (a) is a neighborhood of a.We say that u
i
(
1
(V (a); R), i 1, ..., m are
independent rst integrals of (2.1) if rank(
u1
y
(a), ...,
um
y
(a)) = m
Remark 2.0.8. Let f (
1
(D; R
n
) and a D be xed such that f(a) ,= 0. Then there
exist a neighborhood V (a) D and (n1) independent rst integrals u
1
(y), ..., u
n1
(y) :
y V (a) of the system (2.1).
Proof. Using a permutation of the coordinates (f
1
, ..., f
n
) = f we say that f
n
(a) ,= 0
(see f(a) ,= 0). Denote = (
1
, ...,
n1
) R
n1
: (
1
, ...,
n1
, a
n
) D and
consider F(t, ) : (t, ) [0, T] as the local ow associated with ODE (2.1)
_
dF
dt
(t, ) = f(F(t, )), t [, ],
F(0, ) = (
1
, ...,
n1
, a
n
)
(2.8)
where is a compact subset and (a
1
, ..., a
n1
) int. Using the dierentiability
properties of the local ow F(t, ) : (t, ) [, ] , we get
det
_
F
t
F
1
. . .
F
n1
_
.(0, a
1
, ..., a
n1
) =
= det
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
f
1
(a) 1 0 . . . 0
0 1 .
. 0 .
. . . .
. . . 0
. . 1
f
n
(a) 0 0 . . . 0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
= (1)
n+1
f
n
(a) ,= 0
and the conditions for applying an implicit functions theorem are fullled when the
algebraic equations
F(t, ) = y, y V (a) D, F(0, a
1
, ..., a
n1
) = a (2.9)
are considered. It implies that there exist t = u
0
(y),
i
= u
i
(y), i 1, ..., n 1, y
V (a), which are continuously dierentiable such that
F(u
0
(y), u
1
(y), ..., u
n1
(y)) = y, y V (a) (2.10)
where u
0
(y) (, ) and (y) = (u
1
(y), ..., u
n1
(y)), , for any y V (a).
In addition, u
0
(y), ..., u
n1
(y) : y V (a) is the unique solution satisfying (2.10)
and
u
0
(F(t, )) = t, u
i
(F(t.)) =
i
, i 1, ..., n 1 (2.11)
Using (2.11) we get easily that u
1
(y), ..., u
n1
(y) : y V (a) are (n1) rst integrals
for ODE (2.1) which are independent noticing that
=
ij
where
F
j
(0, ) = e
j
R
n
,
ij
=
_
1, i = j
0, i ,= 0, j 1, ..., n 1
and e
1
, ..., e
n
R
n
is the canonical basis. In conclusion,
=
ij
for any
i, j 1, ..., n 1
and
rank
_
u1
y
(a) . . .
un1
y
(a)
_
= n 1
Theorem 2.0.9. Let f(y) : D R
n
be a continuously dierentiable function such
that f(a) ,= 0 for xed a D. Let u
1
(y), ..., u
n1
(y) : y V (a) D be the
(n1) rst integrals constructed in Theorem 2.0.8. Then for any rst integral of (2.1)
u(y) : y V (a), u (
1
(V, R), there exists an open set R
n1
and h (
1
(, R)
such that u(y) = h(u
1
(y), ..., u
n1
(y)), y V
1
(a) V (a).
Proof. By hypothesis u(y) : y V (a) is a continuously dierentiable rst integral
of ODE (2.1) and we get
u(F(t,
1
, ...,
n1
)) = h(
1
, ...,
n1
), t [, ] (2.12)
provided that F(t, ) : t [, ], is the local ow associated with ODE
(2.1) satisfying F(0,
1
, ...,
n1
) = h(
1
, ...,
n1
, a
n
)(see (2.8) of Theorem 2.0.8).
As far as F (
1
((, ) ; R
n
) and u (
1
(V (a), R) we get h (
1
(, R) fullling
(2.12) where (a
1
, ..., a
n1
) (openset) . Using (2.10) in Theorem 2.0.8 we obtain
47
F(u
0
(y), ..., u
n1
(y)) = y V (a)
and rewrite (2.12) for
t = u
0
(y),
i
= u
i
(y).i 1, ..., n 1
we get
u(y) = h(u
1
(y), ..., u
n1
(y)) for some y V
1
(a) V (a) (2.13)
where (u
1
(y), ..., u
n1
(y)) , y V
1
. The proof is complete.
Remark 2.0.10. The above given consideration can be extended to non autonomous
ODE
dy
dt
= f(t, y), t I R, y G R
n
(2.14)
where f(t, y) : I G R
n
is a continuous function.
In this respect, denote
z = (t, y) R
n+1
, D = I G R
n+1
and consider
g(z) : D R
n+1
dened by
g(z) = coloumn(1, f(t, y)) (2.15)
With these notations, the system (2.14) can be written as an autonomous ODE
dz
dt
= g(z) (2.16)
where g (
1
(D; R
n+1
) provided f is continuously dierentiable on (t, y) I G.
Using Proposition 2.0.6 we restate the conclusion of Theorem 2.0.9 as a result for
linear PDE (2.7).
Proposition 2.0.11. Let a D R
n
be xed such that f(a) ,= 0, where f
(
1
(D; R
n
) denes the characteristic system (2.1). Let u
i
(y) : y V (a) D, i
1, ..., n 1 be the (n 1) rst integral for (2.1) constructed in Theorem 2.0.8.
Then an arbitrary solution u(x) : x V (a) D of the linear PDE (2.7) can
berepresented
u(x) = h(u
1
(x), ..., u
n1
(x)), x V
1
(a) V (a)
where h (
1
(, R) and R
n1
is open set. In particular, each u
i
: x V (a) D
is a solution for the linear PDE (2.7), i 1, ..., n 1
Remark 2.0.12. A strategy based on the corresponding Cauchy characteristic system
of ODE can be used for solving the qausilinear PDE given in (2.6).
2.1 Cauchy Problem for the Hamilton-Jacobi
Equations
A linear Hamiltonion-Jacobi (H-J) is dened by the following rst order PDE
t
S(t, x)+ <
x
S(t, x), g(t, x) >= L(t, x), t I R, x G R
n
(2.17)
where S (
1
(I G; R) is the unknown function
t
S =
S
t
,
x
S =
S
x
and
g(t, x) : I G R
n
, L(t, x) : I G R
are given continuously dierentiable functions. Here I R and G R
n
are open
sets and for each t
0
I, h (
1
(G; R) xed. The following Cauchy problem can be
dened. Find a solution S(t, x) : (t
0
, t
0
+ ) D R verifying (H-J) equation
(2.17) (t, x) (t
0
, t
0
+ ) D, D(open) G such that S(t
0
, x) = h(x), x D,
where t
0
I and h (
1
(G; R) are xed, and (t
0
, t
0
+ ) I. A causilinear
Hamiltonion-Jacobi (H-J) equation is dened by the following rst order PDE
tS(t, x)+ < xS(t, x), g(t, x, S(t, x)) >= L(t, x, S(t, x)), t I R, x G R
n
(2.18)
where g (
1
(I G R; R
n
), L (
1
(I G R; R) are xed and I R, G R
n
are open sets. A Cauchy problem for causilinear (H-J)(2.18)is dened as follows:let
t
0
Iand h (
1
(G; R) be given and nd a solution S(t, x) : (t
0
, t
0
+ )
D R verifying (2.18)for any t (t
0
, t
0
+ ) I and x D(open) G
such that S(t
0
, x) = h(x), x D. A unique Cauchy problem solution of (2.17) and
(2.18) are constructed using the Cauchy method of characteristics which relies on
the corresponding Cauchy characteristic system of ODE. In this respect, we present
this algorithm for (2.18) and let F(t, ) : t (t
0
, t
0
+ ), G be
the local ow generated by the following characteristic system associated with(2.18),
F(t, ) = ((t, ), u(t, )) R
n+1
_
dF
dt
(t, ) = f(t, F(t, )), (t, ) (t
0
, t
0
+)
F(t
0
, ) = (, u(t
0
, )) = (, , h()) , G
(2.19)
where f(t, x, u) = (g(t, x, u), L(t, x, u)) R
n+1
and h (
1
(G; R) is xed. Using
det
_

(t, )
_
,= 0 for any t (t
0
, t
0
+ ) and (compact) G (see
(t
0
, ) = I
n
and we may assume that > 0 is suciently small) an implicit
function theorem can be applied to the algebraic equation
(t, ) = x V (x
0
) G (2.20)
We nd the unique solution of (2.20)
= (
1
(t, x), ...,
n
(t, x)) : (t
0
, t
0
+) V (x
0
) (2.21)
2.2. NONLINEAR FIRST ORDER PDE 49
such that
i
(
1
(t
0
, t
0
+) V (x
0
); R), i 1, ..., n
fullls
(t,
1
(t, x), ...,
n
(t, x)) = x V (x
0
) G (2.22)
for any t (t
0
, t
0
+) and x V (x
0
)
i
(t
0
, x) = x
i
, i = 1, ..., n, = (
1
, ...,
n
) (2.23)
w Dene S(t, x) = u(t, (t, x)) and it will be a continuously dierentiable function on
(t
0
, t
0
+) V (x
0
) satisfying
S(t
0
, x) = u(t
0
, (t
0
, x)) = u(t
0
, x) = h(x), x V (x
0
) (2.24)
In addition using (t, (t, )) = , t (t
0
, t
0
+), and taking the derivative with
respect to the variable t, we get S(t, (t, )) = u(t, ) and
tS(t, (t, ))+ < xS(t, (t, )), g(t, (t, ), u(t, )) >= L(t, (t, ), u(t, )) (2.25)
t (t
0
, t
0
+ ), V
1
(x
0
) where V
1
(x
0
) V (x
0
) is taken such that (t, )
V (x
0
) if (t, ) (t
0
, t
0
+ ) V
1
(x
0
). In particular, for = (t, x) into (1.25),
we obtain
t
S(t, x)+ <
x
S(t, x), g(t, x, S(t, x)) >= L(t, x, S(t, x)) (2.26)
where (t, (t, x)) = x and u(t, (t, x)) = S(t, x) are used. In addition,the Cauchy
problem solution for (2.18) is unique and assuming that another solution v(t, x) of
(2.18) satises v(t
0
, x) = h(x)for x D G then v(t, x) = S(t, x), t (t
0
, t
0
+
), x V (x
0
)
D where > 0. It relies on the unique Cauchy problem associated

withODE (2.19). The proof is complete.
2.2 Nonlinear First Order PDE
2.2.1 Examples of Scalar NonlinearODE
We consider a simple scalar equation given implicitly by
F(x, y(x), y
(x)) = 0, y
(x) =
dy
dx
(x) (2.27)
where F(x, y, z) : D(open) R
3
R be second order continuously dierentiable
satisfying
F(x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) = 0,
z
F(x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) ,= 0 (2.28)
for some (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) D xed. Notice that for a smooth curve
(t) = (x(t), y(t), z(t))) D : t [0, a]
with
x(0) = x
0
, y(0) = y
0
, z(0) = z
0
we get
F((t)) = 0, t [0, a] (2.29)
provided
0 =
d
dt
[F((t))] = xF((t))
dx
dt
(t) + yF((t))
dy
dt
(t) + zF((t))
dz
dt
(t), t [0, a] (2.30)
Using (2.30) we may and do dene a corresponding characteristic system associated
with (2.27)
_
dx
dt
=
F
z
(x, y, z),
dy
dt
= z
F
z
(x, y, z)
dz
dt
= [
F
x
(x, y, z) +
F
y
(x, y, z)z], x(0) = x
0
, y(0) = y
0
, z(0) = z
0
(2.31)
Notice that each solution of (2.31) satises (2.29). Dene x = x(t), y = y(t), z =
z(t), t [a, a], the unique Cauchy problem solution of (2.31) and by denition
dx
dt
(0) =
z
F(x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) ,= 0 allows to apply an implicit function theorem for solving
the following scalar equation
x(t) = x V (x
0
) I(interval) (2.32)
We nd a unique continuously derivable function t = (x) : V (x
0
) (a, a)
x( (x)) = xand (x(t)) = t(
d
dx
(x)
dx
dt
( (x)) = 1) (2.33)
Denote
y(x) = y( (x)), z(x) = z( (x)), x V (x
0
) I
and it is easily seen that
d y
dx
=
dy
dt
( (x)).
d
dx
(x) = z(x)
It implies that
F(x, y(x),
(x)) = 0, x V (x
0
)
provided
F(x(t), y(y), z(t)) = 0, t (a, a)
is used. It shows that y(x) : x V (x
0
) is a solution of the scalar nonlinear
dierential equation (2.27).
Remark 2.2.1. In getting the characteristic system (2.31)we must conne ourselves
to the following constraints y(t) = y(x(t)),
dy
dt
(t) =
d y
dx
(x(t)).
dx
dt
(t) = z(t)
dx
dt
where
z(t) =
d y
dx
(x(t)) and y(x), x I R is a solution of (2.27). The following two
examples can be solved using the algorithm of the characteristic system used for the
scalar equation(2.27).
Example 2.2.1. (Clairant and Lagrange equations)
_
y = xa(y
) + b(y
) (Clairaut equation)
y = xy
+b(y
) (Lagrange equation,a(z)=z)
(2.34)
Here F(x, y, z) = xa(z)+b(z)y and the corresponding characteristic system is given
by
_
dx
dt
= xa
(z) +b
(z),
dz
dt
= a(z) +z,
dz
dt
= z(xa
(z) +b
(z))
x(0) = x
0
z(0) = z
0
y(0) = y
0
(2.35)
where
x
0
a(z
0
) +b(z
0
) y
0
and
x
0
a
(z
0
) +b
(z
0
) ,= 0
Example 2.2.2. (Total dierential equations)
dy
dx
=
g(x, y)
h(x, y)
(2.36)
where g, h : D R
2
R are continuously dierentiable functions and h(x, y) ,=
0, (x, y) D. Formally, (2.36) can be written as
g(x, y)dx +h(x, y)dy = 0 (2.37)
and (2.36) is a total dierential equation if a second order continuously dierentiable
function F : D R exists such that
F
x
(x, y) = g(x, y),
F
y
(x, y) = h(x, y) ,= 0 (2.38)
If y = y(x), x I, is a solution of (2.36) then F(x, y(x)) = constant, x I, pro-
vided F fulls (2.38). In conclusion,assuming(2.38), the nonlinear rst order equation
(2.36) is solved provided the corresponding algebraic equation
F(x, y(x)) = c (2.39)
is satised, where the constant c is parameter.
2.2.2 Nonlinear Hamilton-Jacobi E quations
A Hamilton-Jacobi equation is a rst order PDE of the following form
t
u(t, x) +H(t, x, u(t, x),
x
u(t, x)) = 0, t I R, x D R
n
(2.40)
where H(t, x, u, p) : I DRR
n
R is a second order continuously dierentiable
function.
Denition 2.2.2. A solution for H-J equation (2.40) means a rst order continuously
dierentiable function u(t, x) : I
a
(x
0
) B(x
0
, ) where B(x
0
, ) Iis a ball centered
at x
0
D and I
a
(x
0
) = (x
0
a, x
0
+ a) I. A Cauchy problem for the H-J
equation(2.40) means to nd a solution u (
1
(I
a
(x
0
) B(x
0
, )) of (2.40) such that
u(t
0
, x) = u
0
(x), x B(x
0
, ) where t
0
I and u
0
(
1
(D; R) are xed.
solution for Cauchy problem associated with H-J equation (2.40) is found using the
corresponding characteristic system
_
_
_
dx
dt
=
p
H(t, x, u, p), x(t
0
) = B(x
0
, ) D
dp
dt
= [
x
H(t, x, u, p) +p
u
H(t, x, u, p)], p(t
0
) = p
0
()
du
dt
= H(t, x, u, p)+ < p,
p
H(t, x, u, p) >, u(t
0
) = u
0
()
(2.41)
where p
0
() =
u
0
() and u
0
(
1
(D; R) are xed. Consider that
( x(t, )), p(t, ), u(t, ) : t I
a
(x
0
), B(x
0
, ) (2.42)
is the unique solution fullling ODE (2.40). By denition
x(0, ) = I
n
and assuming
that a > 0 is suciently small, we admit
x(t, ) is nonsingular for any(t, x) I

a
(x
0
) B(x
0
, ) (2.43)
Using (2.47) we may and do apply the standard implicit functions theorem for solving
the algebraic equation
x(t, ) = x B(x
0
,
1
), t I
(x
0
) (2.44)
We get a continuously dierentiable mapping
= (t, x) : I
(x
0
) B(x
0
,
1
) B(x
0
, )
such that
x(t, (t, x)) = x, (t
0
, x) = x and
(t, x(t, )) = for any
t I
(x
0
), x B(x
0
,
1
) (2.45)
Dene the following continuously dierentiable function
u (
1
(I
(x
0
) B(x
0
,
1
); R), p (
1
(I
(x
0
) B(x
0
,
1
); R
n
)
u(t, x) = u(t, (t, x)), p(t, x) = p(t, (t, x)) (2.46)
By denition u(t
0
, x) = u
0
(x), x B(x
0
,
1
) D and to show that u(t, x) :
t I
(x
0
), x B(x
0
,
1
) is a solution for (2.40) satisfying u(t
0
, x) = u
0
(x), x
B(x
0
,
1
) D, we need to show
_

t
u(t, x) = H(t, x, u(t, x), p(t, x))
p(t, x) =
x
u(t, x), (t, x) I
(x
0
) B(x
0
,
1
)
(2.47)
The second equation of (2.47)is valid if
u(t, ) = p(t, )
x(t, ), ( p R
n
)
is a row vector holds for each
t I
(x
0
), B(x
0
, ) (2.48)
which will be proved in the second form
k
u(t, ) =< p(t, ),
k
x(t, ) >, k 1, ..., n (2.49)
where
k
(y, ) =
(t, )
k
, = (
1
, ...,
n
)
Using the characteristic system (2.40) we notice that
k
(t, ) =
k
u(t, ) < p(t, ),
k
x(t, ) >
fulls
k
(t
0
, ) =
k
u
0
() = 0, k 1, ..., n (2.50)
where
e
1
, ..., e
n
R
n
is the canonical basis. In addition, by a direct computation, we obtain
d
k
dt
(t, ) =
k
[
d u
dt
(t, )] <
d p(t, )
dt
k
x(t, ) > < p(t, ),
k
[
d x
dt
(t, )] >, t I
(x
0
) (2.51)
Notice that
k
[
d u
dt
(t, )] =
k
[H(t, x(t, ), u(t, ), p(t, ))]+ <
k
p(t, )
x
dt
(t, ) > + < p(t, ),
k
[
d x
dt
(t, )] > (2.52)
and
d p
dt
(t, ) = [xH(t, x(t, )), u(t, ), p(t, 1) + p(t, )uH(t, x(t, )), u(t, ), p(t, )] (2.53)
Combining (2.52)and (2.53) we obtain
d
k
dt
(t, ) =
u
H(t, x(t, ), u(t, ), p(t, )).
k
u(t, ) +
u
H(t, x(t, ), u(t, ), p(t, ))
< p(t, ),
k
x(t, ) >=
u
H(t, x(t, ), u(t, ), p(t, )).
k
(t, ) (2.54)
which is a linear scalar equation for the unknown
k
satisfying
k
(t
0
, ) = 0, k
1, ..., n(see(2.51)). It follows
k
(t, ) = 0, (t, ) I
(x
0
) B(x
0
,
1
) and for any
k 1, ..., n, which proves
p(t, x) =
x
u(t, x), (t, x) I
(x
0
) B(x
0
,
1
) (2.55)
standing for the second equation in(2.47). Using(2.55), u(t, ) = u(t, x(t, ))and the
third equation of the characteristic system (2.40) we see easily that
t
u(t, x(t, ))+ < p(t, ),
d x
dt
(t, ) >= H(t, x(t, ), u(t, ), p(t, ))
+ < p(t, ),
d x
dt
(t, ) > (2.56)
which lead us to the rst equation of (2.47)
t
u(t, x(t, )) = H(t, x(t, ), u(t, ), p(t, )) (2.57)
for any (t, ) I
(x
0
) B(x
0
, ). In particular ,taking = (t, x) in (2.58), we get
t
u(t, x) = H(t, x, u(t, x),
x
u(t, x)), u(t
0
, x) = u
0
(x) (2.58)
(t, x) (t
0
, t
0
+) B(x
0
,
1
)
which stands for the existence of a Cauchy problem solution. The uniqueness of
the Cauchy problem solution for H-J equation(2.40) can be easily proved using the
fact that any other solution u(t, x), (t, x) I
(x
0
) B(x
0
,
2
) satisfying (2.49) and
u(t
0
, x) = u
0
(x), x B(x
0
,
2
) induces a solution of the same ODE (2.40). The
conclusion is that the uniqueness property for the Cauchy problem solution of ODE
(2.41) implies that the H-J equation (2.40) has a unique Cauchy problem solution.
The above given computations and considerations regarding the H-J equation (2.40)
will be stated as
Proposition 2.2.3. Let H(t, x, u, p) : I D R R
n
R be a second order
continuously dierentiable scalar function, where I R, D R
n
are open sets. Let
(t
0
, x
0
) I Dand u
0
(
1
(D; R) are xed. Then the following nonlinear H-J
equation
t
u(t, x) +H(t, x, u(t, x),
x
u(t, x)) = 0 (2.59)
This has a unique Cauchy problem solution satisfying
u(t
0
, x) u
0
(x), x B(x
0
,
0
) D
In addition,the unique Cauchy problem solution
u(t, x) : t (t
0
, t
0
+), x B(x
0
,
0
)
of (2.59) is dened by u(t, x) = u(t, (t, x))where (t, x) : t I
(x
0
), x B(x
0
,
0
)
is the unique solution of the algebraic (2.44) and
( x(t, ), p(t, ), u(t, )) : t I
(x
0
), B(x
0
, )
is the unique solution of the characteristic system (2.41)
Starting with the H-J equation (2.59) (see(2.40)) we may associate the following
system of H-J equation for the unknown p(t, x) =
x
u(t, x) R
n
t
p(t, x) + (2.60)
= [
x
H(t, x, u(t, x), p(t, x)) +p(t, x)
u
H(t, x, u(t, x), p(t, x))]
where p = (p
1
, ..., p
n
),
p
H and
x
H are row vectors. Using
xi
p(t, x) =
x
p
i
(t, x), i
1, ..., n we notice that (2.60) can be written as follows
t
p
i
(t, x) + <
x
p
i
(t, x),
p
H(t, x, u(t.x), p(t, x)) > (2.61)
= [
xi
H(t, x, u(t, x), p(t, x)) + p
i
(t, x)
u
H(t, x, u(t, x), p(t, x))]
for each i 1, ..., n, and
(
x
(t, )),
p
(t, ) = p(t,
x
(t, )),
u
(t, ) = u(t,
x
(t, ) : t I
(x
0
)) (2.62)
satises the characteristic system (2.42) provided
_
d x(t,)
dt
=
p
H(t, x(t, ), u(t, ), p(t, )), t I
(x
0
)
x(t
0
, ) =
(2.63)
The additional system of H-J equation (2.61) stands for a causilinear system of evo-
lution equations
_

t
v
i
(t, x)+ <
x
v
i
(t, x), X(t, x, v(t, x)) >= L
i
(t, x, v(t, x))
v
i
(t
0
, x) = v
0
6
, i 1, ...n
(2.64)
Which allows to use the corresponding characteristic system suitable for a scalar
equation. It relies on the unique vector eld X(t, x, v) deriving each scalar equation
in the system (2.64).
Remark 2.2.4. In the case that the unique vector eld X(t, x, v) is replaced by some
X
i
(t, x, v), for each i 1, ..., n, which are not commuting with respect to the Lie
bracket [X
i
(t, x, .), X
i
(t, x, .)](v) ,= o, for some i ,= j, then the integration of the system
(2.64)changes drastically.
2.2.3 Exercises
(E
1
).Using the characteristic system method, solve the following Cauchy problems
t
u(t, x) = (
x
u(t, x))
2
, u(0, x) = cosx, x R, u R (2.65)
_

t
u(t, x
1
, x
2
) = x
1
x1
u(t, x
1
, x
2
) + (
x2
u(t, x
1
, x
2
))
2
u(0, x
1
, x
2
) = x
1
+x
2
, (x
1
, x
2
) R
2
, u R
(2.66)
(E
2
). Let f(t, x) : R R
n
R and (x) : R R be some rst order continuously
dierentiable functions. Find the Cauchy problem solution of the following linear H-J
equations
_

t
u(t, x)+
n
i=1
a
i
(t)
xi
u(t, x) = f(t, x)
u(0, x) = (x)
(2.67)
where a(t) = (a
1
(t), ..., a
n
(t)) : R R
n
is a continuous function.
_

t
u(t, x)+ < A(t)x.
x
u(t, x) >= f(t, x)
u(0, x) = (x)
(2.68)
where A(t) : R M
nn
is a continuous mapping.
2.3 Stationary Solutions for Nonlinear First
Order PDE
2.3.1 Introduction
We consider a nonlinear equation
H
0
(x,
x
u(x), u(x)) = constant x D R
n
(2.69)
where
H
0
(x, p, u) : R
n
R
n
R R
2.3. STATIONARY SOLUTIONS FOR NONLINEAR IST ORDER PDE 57
is a scalar continuously dierentiable function
H
0
(
1
(R
n
R
n
R)
and
x
u = (
1
u, ...,
n
u) stands for the gradient of a scalar function. A standard
solution for (2.69) means to nd u(x) : B(x
0
, ) D R, u (
1
(B(x
0
, )) such
that H
0
(x,
x
u(x), u(x)) = constant x B(x
0
, ) D. The usual method of solving
(2.69) uses the associated characteristic system
d z
dt
= Z
0
( z), z(0, ) = z(), R
n1
, t (a, a) (2.70)
where Z
0
(z) : R
2n+1
R
2n+1
, z = (x, p, u), is the characteristic vector eld corre-
sponding to H
0
(z)
Z
0
(z) = (X
0
(z), P
0
(z), U
0
(z)), X
0
(z) =
p
H
0
(z) R
n
(2.71)
U
0
(z) =< p, X
0
(z) >, P
0
(z) = (
x
H
0
(z) +p
u
H
0
(z)) R
n
For a xed Cauchy condition z() = ( x(), p(), u()) given on a domain
R
n1
, a compatibility condition
i
u() =< p(),
i
x() >, i 1, ..., n 1 (2.72)
is necessary. In addition, both vector elds Z
0
(z) and the parametrization z() :
must satisfy a nonsingularity condition
the vectors in R
n
, X
0
( z()),
1
x(), ...,
n1
x() (2.73)
are linearly independent for any R
n1
By denition, the characteristic vector eld
z
H
0
(z) : z R2n + 1 and we get
0 =
_
< zH0(z), Z0(z) >
< xH0(z), X0(z) > + < pH0(z), P0(z) > +uH0(z)U0(z)
(2.74)
for any z = (x, p, u) R
2n+1
. Using (2.74) for the local solution z(t, ) : t (a, a)
of the characteristic system (2.70) we obtain H
0
( z(t, )) = H
0
( z()), t (a, a), for
each R
n1
. Looking for a stationary solution of the equation (2.69) we need
to impose the following constaint
H
0
( z(t, )) = H
0
(z
0
)for any(t, ) (a, a) (2.75)
where z
0
= z(0) = (x
0
, p
0
, u
0
)(0 int for simplicity). The condition (2.73) allows
to apply the standard implicit function theorem and to solve the algebraic equation
x(t, ) = B(x
0
, ) D (2.76)
We get smooth functions t = (x) (a, a) and = (x) such that
x((x), (x)) = x B(x
0
, ) D, (x
0
) = 0, (x
0
) = 0 (2.77)
A solution for the nonlinear equation (2.69) is obtained as follows
u(x) = u((x), (x)), p(x) = p((x), (x)), x B(x
0
, ) R
n
(2.78)
where p(x) fulls
p(x) =
x
u(x)
Obstruction. We need explicit condition to compute z() : such that (2.72),
(2.73) and (2.75) are veried.
2.3.2 The Lie Algebra of Characteristic Fields
Denote 1 = (
(R
2n+1
; R) the space consisting of the scalar functions H(x, p, u) :
R
n
R
n
R R which are dierentiable of any order. For each pair H
1
, H
2
dene
the Poisson bracket
H
1
, H
2
(z) =<
z
H
2
(z), Z
1
(z) >, z = (x, p, u) R
2n+1
(2.79)
where
z
H
2
(z) stands for the gradient of a scalar function H
2
1 and Z
1
(z) =
(X
1
(z), P
1
(z), U
1
(z)) R
2n+1
is the characteristic eld corresponding to H
1
1.
We recall that Z
1
is obtained from H
1
1 such that the following equations
X
1
(z) =
p
H
1
(z), P
1
(z) = (
x
H
1
(z) +p
u
H
1
(z)), U
1
(z) =< p,
p
H
1
(z) > (2.80)
are satised. The linear mapping connecting an arbitrary H 1and its characteristic
eld can be represented by
Z
H
(z) = T(p)(
z
H)(z), z = (x, p, u) R
2n+1
(2.81)
where the real (2n + 1) (2n + 1) matrix T(p) is dened by
T(p) =
_
_
O I
n

I
n
O p
0
_
_
(2.82)
where O-zero matrix of M
nn
, I
n
unity matrix of M
nn
and R
n
is the null column
vector. We notice that T(p) is a skew symmetric matrix
[T(p)]
= T(p) (2.83)
and as a consequence, the Poisson bracket satises a skew symmetric property
H
1
, H
2
(z) =
_
_
<
z
H
1
(z), Z
2
(z) >
<
z
H
1
(z), T(p)
z
H
2
(z) >
< [T(p)]
z
H
1
(z),
z
H
2
(z) >
H
2
, H
1
(2.84)
In addition, the linear space of characteristic elds K (
(R
2n+1
, R
2n+1
) is the
image of a linear mapping S : D1 K where D1 =
z
H : H 1. In this
respect, using (2.81) we dene
S(
z
H)(z) = T(p)(
z
H)(z), z R
2n+1
(2.85)
where the matrix T(p) is given in (2.82). The linear space of characteristic elds
K = S(d1) is extended to a Lie algebra
L
k
(
(R
2n+1
, R
2n+1
)
using the standard Lie bracket of vector elds
[Z
1
, Z
2
] = [
z
Z
2
(z)]Z
1
[
z
Z
1
]Z
2
(z), Z
i
K, i = 1, 2 (2.86)
On the other hand, each H 1 is associated with a linear mapping
H()(z) = H
1
(z) =<
z
(z), Z
H
(z)) >, z R
2n+1
(2.87)
for each 1, where Z
H
K is the characteristic vector eld corresponding to
H 1 obtained from
z
H by Z
H
(z) = T(p)(
z
H)(z) (see (2.81)). Dene a linear
space consisting of linear mappings
1 =
H : H 1 (2.88)
and extend

1 to a Lie algebra L
H
using the Lie bracket of linear mappings
[
H
1
,
H
2
] =

H
1

H
2
H
2
H
1
(2.89)
The link between the two Lie algebras L
K
(extending K) and L
H
(extending

1) is
given by a homomorphism of Lie algebras
A : L
H
L
K
satisfying A(
1) = K (2.90)
and
A([
H
1
,
H
2
]) = [Z
1
, Z
2
] L
K
whereZ
i
= A(
H
i
), i 1, 2 (2.91)
Remark 2.3.1. The Lie algebra L
H
(

1) does not coincide with the linear space
1 and as a consequence,the linear space K L

k
. It relies upon the fact the linear
mapping
H
1
, H
2
generated by the Poisson bracket H
1
, H
2
1 does not coincide
with the Lie bracket [
H
1
,
H
1
] dened in (2.89).
Remark 2.3.2. In the particular case when the equation (2.69) is replaced by H
0
(x, p) :
R
2n
R is continuously dierentiable then the above given analysis will be restricted
to the space 1 = (
(R
2n
; R). If it is the case then the corresponding linear mapping
S : D1 K is determined by a simplectic matrix T M
2n2n
T =
_
O I
n
I
n
O
_
, D1 =
z
H : H (
(R
2n
; R) (2.92)
In addition, the linear spaces

H and K (
(R
2n
; R
2n
) coincide with their Lie algebra
L
H
and correspondingly L
K
as the following direct computation shows
[Z
1
, Z
2
](z) = T
z
H
12
, z R
2n
(2.93)
where
Z
i
= T
z
H
i
, i 1, 2
and
H
12
= H
1
, H
2
(z) =<
z
H
2
(z), Z
1
(z) >
is the Poisson bracket associated with two scalar functions H
1
, H
2
1. We get
T
z
H
12
(z) =
_
_
T[
2
z
H
2
(z)]Z
1
(z) +T(
z
Z
1
(z))
z
H
2
[
z
Z
2
(z)]Z
1
(z) +T[
z
(
z
H
1
T
)]
z
H
2
(z)
[
z2
(z)]Z
1
(z) T(
2
z
H
1
(z))T
z
H
2
(z)
[
z
Z
2
(z)]Z
1
(z) [
z
Z
1
(z)]Z
2
(z)
(2.94)
and the conclusion L
H
=

H, L
K
= K is proved.
2.3.3 Parameterized Stationary Solutions
Consider a nonlinear rst order equation
H
0
(x, p(x), u(x)) = const x D R
n
(2.95)
With the same notations as in section 2.4.2, let 1 = (
(R
2n+1
; R), z = (x, p, u)
R
2n+1
and dene the skew-symmetric matrix
T(p) =
_
_
O I
n

I
n
O p
0
_
_
, p R
n
(2.96)
By denition, the linear spaces K and D1 are
K = S(D1), D( =
z
H : H 1 (2.97)
where the mapping S : D1 K satises
S(
z
H)(z) = T(p)
z
H(z), z R
2n+1
(2.98)
Let z
0
= (x
0
, p
0
, u
0
) R
2n+1
and the ball B(x
0
, 2) R
2n+1
be xed. Assume that
there exist Z
1
, ..., Z
m
K (2.99)
such that the smooth vector elds
Z
1
(z), ..., Z
m
(z) : z B(z
0
, 2)
are in involution over (
(B(z
0
, 2))
(the Lie bracket)[Z
i
, Z
j
](z) =
m
k=1
k
ij
(z)Z
k
(z), i, j 1, ..., m
where
k
ij
(
(B(z
0
, 2))
A parameterized solution of the equation (2.95) is given by the following orbit
z(, z
0
) = G
1
(t
1
) ... G
m
(t
m
)(z
0
), = (t
1
, ..., t
m
) =
m
1
[a
i
, a
i
] (2.100)
where
G
i
()(y), y B(z
0
, ), [a
i
, a
i
]
is the local ow generated by Z
i
. Notice that
N
z0
= z B(z
0
, 2) : z = z(, z
0
), (2.101)
is a smooth manifold and
dimM
z0
= dimL(Z
1
, ..., Z
m
)(z
0
) = m nif Z
1
(z
0
), ..., Z
m
(z
0
) R
2n+1
(2.102)
are linearly independent.
Remark 2.3.3. Under the conditions of the hypothesis (2.99) and using the alge-
braic representation of a gradient system associated with Z
1
, ..., Z
m
K a system
q
1
, ..., q
m
(
(, R
m
) exists such that
q
1
(), ..., q
m
() R
m
arelinearlyindependent (2.103)
and
z(, z
0
)q
i
() = Z
i
( z(, z
0
)) for any , i 1, ..., m
Denition 2.3.4. A parameterized solution associated with (2.95)is dened by orbit
(2.100)provided the equality H
0
( z(, z
0
)) = H
0
(z
0
), , is satised.
Remark 2.3.5. The conclusion (2.103) does not depend on the manifold structure
given in (2.101). Using (2.104), we rewrite the equation H
0
( z(, z
0
)) = H
0
(z
0
),
, in the following equivalent form
0 = H
i
, H
0
( z(.z
0
)) =<
z
H
0
( z(, z
0
)), Z
i
( z(, z
0
)) >, (2.104)
for each i 1, ..., m, where H
i
, H
0
is the Poisson bracket associated with H
i
, H
0

(
1
(R
2n+1
, R), and Z
i
= S(
z
H
i
), i 1, ..., m. The equations (2.104) are directly
computed from the scalar equation H
0
( z(, z
0
)) = H
0
(z
0
), , by taking the cor-
responding Lie derivatives where q
1
, ..., q
m
from (2.103) are used. As a consequence,
the orbit dened in (2.100), under the conditions (2.103) and (2.102), will determine
a parameterized solution of (2.104).
Remark 2.3.6. A classical solution for (2.95) can be deduced from a parameterized
solution z(, z
0
) : if we take m = n and assume
the matrix [
x(0, z
0
)] M
nn
is nonsingular (2.105)
where the components ( x(, z
0
), p(, z
0
), u(, z
0
)) = z(, z
0
) dene the parameterized
solution z(, z
0
).
Proposition 2.3.7. Assume the orbit z(, z
0
) : given in (2.100) is a param-
eterized solution of (2.95) such that the condition (2.105) is satised.Let = (x) :
S(x
0
, ) int be the smooth mapping satisfying x((x), z
0
) = x B(x
0
, ), (x
0
) =
0. Denote u(x) = u((x), z
0
) and p(x) = p((x), z
0
).Then
p(x) =
x
u(x)and H
0
(x, p(x), u(x)) = H
0
(z
0
), for any x B(x
0
, ) R
n
(2.106)
where p(x) , x B(x
0
, )) veries the following cuasilinear system of rst order equa-
tions
[
x
H
0
(x, p(x), u(x)) +p(x)
u
H
0
(x, p(x), u(x))]
+[
x
p(x)]
p
H
0
(x, p(x), u(x)) = 0, x B(x
0
, ) (2.107)
Proof. The component x(, z
0
) : fullls the condition of the standard implicit
functions theorem (see (2.105)) and, by denition, the matrix
x(0.z
0
) =| X
1
(z
0
, ..., X
n
(z
0
)) |
is composed by rst vector-component of Z
i
(z) = (X
i
(z), P
i
(z), U
i
(z)) i 1, ..., n,
where Z
1
(z), ..., Z
n
(z) dene the orbit z(, z
0
). Let = (x) : B(x
0
, )
R
n
int R
n
be such that (x
0
) = 0 and x((x), z
0
) = x. Denote p(x) =
p((x), z
0
), u(x) = u((x), z
0
) and using the equation
H
0
( z(, z
0
)) = H
0
(z
0
),
we get
H
0
(z(x)) = H
0
(z
0
), x B(x
0
, ) R
n
where z(x) = (x, p(x), u(x)). Using (2.103) written on corresponding components we
nd that
u(, z
0
)q
i
() = p(, z
0
)
x(, z
0
)q
i
()), i 1, ..., n and
u(, z
0
) = p(, z
0
)
x(, z
0
), (2.108)
is satised, where p() R
n
is a row vector. On the other hand, a direct computation
applied to u( x(, z
0
)) = u(, z
0
) leads us to
x
u( x(, z
0
)).
x(, z
0
) =
u(, z
0
) (2.109)
and using (2.105) we may and do multiply by the inverse matrix [
x(, z
0
)]
1
in both equations (2.108) and (2.109). We get p(, z
0
) =
x
u( x(, z
0
)), for any
B(z
0
, 2) ( > 0 suciently small) which stands for
x
u(x) = p(x), x B(z
0
, ) R
n
provided = (x) is used. The conclusions (2.107) tell us that the gradient
x
[H
0
(x, p(x), u(x))]
is vanishing and the proof is complete.
Remark 2.3.8. Taking Z
1
, ..., Z
m
K is involution we get the property (2.103)
fullled (see 5 of ch II)
0 =
_
_
H
i
, H
0
( z(z, z
0
))
<
z
H
0
( z(, z
0
)), Z
i
( z(, z
0
)) >
< T(p)
z
H
0
( z(, z
0
)),
z
H
i
( z(, z
0
)) >
<
z
H
i,
( z(, z
0
)), Z
0
( z(, z
0
)) >, i 1, ..., m
(2.110)
It shows that H
1
, ..., H
m
1 = (
(R
2n+1
, R) dening Z
1
, ..., Z
m
K can be
found as rst integrals for a system of ODE
dz
dt
= Z
0
(z), Z
0
(z) = T(p)
z
H
0
(z) K
corresponding to H
0
(z).
2.3.4 The linear Case:H
0
(x, p) =< p, f
0
(x) >
With the same notations as in 4.3 we dene z = (x, p) R
2n
and 1 = H(z) =<
p, f(x) >, p R
2n
, f (
(R
2n
, R
2n
). The linear space of characteristic elds
K (
(R
2n
, R
2n
) is the image of a linear mapping S : D1 K, where
D1 =
z
H : H 1, S(
z
H)(z) = T
z
H(z), z R
2n
(2.111)
T =
_
O I
n
I
n
O
_
for eachZ K (2.112)
is given by
Z(z) =
_

p
H(z)
x
H(z)
_
=
_
f(x)
x
< p, f(x) >
_
(2.113)
Let z
0
= (p
0
, x
0
) R
2n
and B(z
0
, 2) R
2n
be xed and consider the following linear
equation of p R
n
H
0
(x, p) =< p, f
0
(x) >= H
0
(z
0
)for any z D B(z
0
, 2) (2.114)
where f
0
(
1
(R
2n
, R
2n
). We are looking for D B(z
0
, 2) R
2n
as an orbit.
z(, z
0
) = G
1
(t
1
) ... G
m
(t
m
)(z
0
), = t
1
, ..., t
m
=
m
1
[a
i
, a
i
] (2.115)
where G
i
()(y), y B(z
0
, ), [a
i
, a
i
], is the local ow generated by some Z
i

K, i 1, ..., m, m n. Assuming that
Z
1
, ..., z
m
K are in involution over (
(B(z
0
, 2), R) (2.116)
where
Z
i
(z) =
_
f
i
(x)
x
< p, f
i
(x) >
_
andf
1
, ..., f
m
(
(R
2n
, R
2n
)
(B(x
0
), R) we dene
D = z B(z
0
, 2) : z = z(, z
0
), R
2n
(2.117)
where the orbit z(, z
0
) : is given in (2.115). Notice that the orbit (2.115) is
represented by
z(, z
0
) = ( x(, z
0
), p(, z
0
)), , z
0
= (x
0
, p
0
) R
2n
(2.118)
where the orbit x(, z
0
), , inR
n
veries
x(, x
0
) = F
1
(t
1
) ... F
m
(t
m
)(x
0
), = t
1
, ..., t
m
(2.119)
Here F
i
()(x), x B(x
0
, ) R
n
, [a
i
, a
i
], is the local owgenerated by the
vector eld f
i
(
(R
n
, R
n
) and f
1
, ..., f
m
(
(R
n
, R
n
) are in involution over
(
(B(x
0
, )).
Remark 2.3.9. Denote by N
x0
R
n
the set consisting of all points x(, x
0
) :
using the orbit dened in (2.119). Assuming thatf
1
(x
0
), ..., f
m
(x
0
) R
n
are
linearly independent then f(x
0
), ..., f
m
(x) R
n
are linearly independent for any
x B(x
0
, )( suciently small) and the subset N
x0
R
n
can be structured as an
m-dimensional smooth manifold. In addition,the set D R
2n
dened in (2.117)
can be veried as an image of smooth mapping z(x) = (x, p(x)) : N
x0
D, if
p(x) = p((x), z
0
) and = (x) : B(x
0
, ) is unique solution of the algebraic
equation x(, x
0
) = x B(x
0
, ).
Denition 2.3.10. The orbit z(, z
0
) : dened in (2.115) is a parameterized
solution of the linear equation (2.114) if H
0
( z(, z
0
)) = H(z
0
) , .
Proposition 2.3.11. Let z
0
= (x
0
, p
0
) R
2n
and B(z
0
, 2) R
2n
be xed such that
the hypothesis (2.116) is fullled.For Z
1
, ..., Z
m
K given in (2.116) assume in ad-
dition, that f
1
, ..., f
m
are commuting with f
0
i.e [f
i
, f
0
](x) = 0, x B(x
0
, 2), i
1, ..., m. Then the orbit z(, z
0
) : dened in (2.115) is a parameterized so-
lution of equation (2.114), where D R
2n
is given in (2.117).
Proof. By hypothesis ,the Lie algebra L(Z
1
, ..., Z
m
) (
(R
2n
, R
2n
) is of nite type
(locally) and Z
1
, ..., Z
m
is a system of generators in L(Z
1
, ..., Z
m
). As a consequence
L(Z
1
, ..., Z
m
) is (f.g.; z
0
) and using the algebraic representation of the gradient sys-
tem associated with Z
1
, ..., Z
m
we get q
1
, ..., q
m
(
(; R
n
) such that
z(, z
0
).q
i
() = Z
i
( z(, z
0
)), , i 1, ..., m, q
1
(), ..., q
m
() R
m
(2.120)
are linearly independent for any .
The meaning of (f.g.; z
0
) Lie algebra and the conclusion (2.120) are explained in
the next section. For the time being we use (2.120) and taking Lie derivatives of the
scalar equation H
0
( z(, z
0
)) = H
0
(z
0
), , we get
0 =
H( z(, z0)).qi() =< zH( z(, z0)), Zi( z(, z0)) >, for any i {1, ..., m} (2.121)
and . By denition
z
H
0
=
_

x
< p, f
0
(x) >
f
0
(x)
_
, and Z
i
(z) =
_
f
i
(x)
x
< p, f
0
(x) >
_
, i 1, ..., m
which allows us to rewrite (2.121) as follows
< p(, z
0
), [f
i
, f
0
]( x(, x
0
)) >= 0, i 1, ..., m, (2.122)
Using [f
i
, f
0
](x) = 0, x B(x
0
, 2), i 1, ..., m we obtain that (2.121) is fullled
and it implies
H
0
( z(, z
0
)) = 0, (2.123)
provided (2.120) is used. In conclusion, the scalar equation H
0
(z) = H
0
(z
0
) for any
z D R
2n
, is satised, where D is dened in(2.117) and the proof is complete.
Remark 2.3.12. The involution condition of Z
1
, ..., Z
m
K is satised if
f
1
, ..., f
m
(
(B(x
0
, 2); R
n
)
are in involution over R. In this respect, using the particular form of
Z
i
(z) =
_
f
i
(x)
A
i
(x)p
_
, A
i
(x) = [
x
f
i
(x)]
i 1, ..., m
we compute a Lie bracket [Z
i
, Z
j
] as follows
[Z
i
, Z
j
](z) =
_
[f
i
, f
j
](x)
P
ij
(z)
_
, i, j 1, ..., m (2.124)
Here [f
i
, f
j
] is the Lie bracket from (
(R
2n
, R
2n
) and
P
ij
(z)
_
_
= [
x
(A
j
(x)p)].f
i
(x) +A
j
(x)A
i
(x)p [
x
(A
i
(x)p)]f
j
(x)
= A
i
(x)A
j
(x)p
=
x
[< A
j
(x)p, f
i
(x) > < A
i
(x)p, f
j
(x) >]
=
x
< p, [f
i
, f
j
](x) >
(2.125)
where
P
ij
(z) = [
z
(A
j
(x)p)]Z
i
(z) [
z
(A
i
(x)p)]Z
j
(x), z R
2n
(2.126)
is used. Notice that (2.125) allows one to write (2.3.12) as a vector eld from K
[Z
i
, Z
j
](z) = T
z
H
ij
(z), z = (x, p) R
2n
(2.127)
where H
ij
=< p, [f
i
, f
j
](x) >, i, j 1, ..., m. As a consequence, assuming that
f
1
, ..., f
m
are in involution over R we get that L(f
1
, ..., f
m
) and L(Z
1
, ..., Z
m
) are
nite dimensional with Z
1
, ..., Z
m
in involution over R.
2.3.5 The Case H
0
(x, p, u) = H
0
(x, p); Stationary Solutions
Denote (
(R
2n
, R
n
) , z = (x, p) R
2n
and dene the linear space of characteristic
elds K (
(R
2n
, R
n
) , z = (x, p) R
2n
by
K = S(D1), D1 =
z
H : H 1 (2.128)
Here the linear mapping : D1 K is given by
S(
z
H)(z) = T
z
H(z), H 1, z R
2n
(2.129)
and T is the simplectic matrix
T =
_
O I
n
I
n
O
_
, T
2
=
_
I
n
O
O I
n
_
(2.130)
Let z
0
= (x
0
, p
0
) R
2n
and B(z
0
, 2) R
2n
be xed and consider the following
nonlinear equation
H
0
(z) = H
0
(z
0
), z D B(z
0
, 2) (2.131)
where H
0
(
1
(B(z
0
, 2); R) is given and D B(z
0
, 2) has to be found. A solution
for (2.131) uses the following assumption
there exist Z
1
, ..., Z
m
K such that Z
1
(z), ..., z
m
(z) : z B(z
0
, 2) (2.132)
in involution over (
(B(z
0
, 2); R). Assuming that (2.132) is fullled then a param-
eterized solution for (2.131) uses the following orbit
z(, z
0
) = G
1
(t
1
) ... G
m
(t
m
)(z
0
), = (t
1
, ..., t
m
) =
m
1
[a
i
, a
i
] (2.133)
where
G
i
()(y), y B(z
0
, ), [a
i
, a
i
]
is the local ow generated by Z
i
K given in (2.132). By denition
Z
i
(z) = T
z
H
i
(z) =
_

p
H
i
(x, p)
x
H
i
(x, p)
_
, i 1, ..., m (2.134)
and we recall that, in this case, the linear space of characteristic elds K is closed
under the lie bracket. As a consequence, each Lie product [Z
i
, Z
j
] can be computed
by
[Z
i
, Z
j
](z) = T
z
H
ij
(z), i, j 1, ..., m, z R
2n
(2.135)
where H
ij
(z) = H
i
, H
j
(z) =<
z
H
ij
(z), Z
i
(z) >= <
z
H
i
, Z
j
(z) >
stands for Poisson bracket associated with two (
1
scalar functions. In addition, as-
suming (2.132) we get that the Lie algebra L(Z
1
, ..., Z
m
) (
(B(z
0
, 2), R
n
) is of
the nite type (see in next section) allowing one to use the algebraic representation
of the corresponding gradient system. We get thatq
1
, ..., q
m
(
(, R
m
) will exist
such that
z(, z
0
)q
i
() = Z
i
( z(, z
0
)), i 1, ..., m , , q
1
(), ..., q
m
() R
m
(2.136)
are linearly independent, , where z(, z
0
) : is the xed orbit given in
(2.133). Denote D = z B(z
0
, 2) : z = z(, z
0
), and the orbit given in
(2.133) is a parameterized solution of the equation (2.131) iff
[H
0
( z(, z
0
))]q
i
() = 0, i 1, ..., m (2.137)
Using (2.136) we rewrite (2.137)as follows
0 =<
H0( z(, z0)), Zi( z(, z0)) >= {Hi, H0}( z(, z0)), , i {1, ..., m} (2.138)
It is easily seen that (2.138) is fullled provided
H
1
, ..., H
m
(
(B(z
0
, 2), R
n
)
can be found such that
0 = H
i
, H
0
(z) =<
z
H
0
(z), T
z
H
i
(z) >=< Z
0
(z),
z
H
i
(z) > (2.139)
for each i 1, ..., m z B(z
0
, 2) and Z
i
(z) = T
z
H
i
(z) , i 1, ..., m are in
involution for z B(z
0
, 2). In particular ,the equations in (2.139) tell us that
H
1
, ..., H
m
are rst integrals for the vector eld Z
0
(z) = T
z
H
0
(z).
Remark 2.3.13. Taking H
0
(
2
(B(z
0
, 2; R))(instead of H
0
(
1
) we are in posi-
tion to rewrite the equation (2.139) using Lie product [Z
0
, Z
j
] (see (2.135)) as follows
0 =
_
[Z
0
, Z
j
](z), j 1, ..., m, z B(z
0
, 2)
H
i
, H
0
(z
0
) =< Z
0
(z
0
),
z
H
i
(z
0
) >, i 1, ..., m
(2.140)
We conclude these considerations.
Proposition 2.3.14. Let z
0
= (x
0
, p
0
) R
2n
and B(z
0
, 2) R
2n
be xed such that
the hypothesis (2.151) and (2.138) are fullled. Then z(, z
o
) : dened in
(2.133)is a parameterized stationary solution of the nonlinear equation (2.131).
Remark 2.3.15. A standard solution for the nonlinear equation
H
0
(x, p(x)) = const, x D R
n
can be found from a parameterized solution provided the hypothesis (2.132) is stated
with m = n and assuming, in addition, that X
1
(z
0
), ..., X
n
(z
0
) R
n
from
Z
i
(z) =
_
X
i
(z)
P
i
(z)
_
, i 1, ..., n
are linearly independent. It leads us to the equations
H
0
( x(, z
0
), p(, z
0
)) = 0 =
n
1
[a
i
, a
i
] (2.141)
where the orbit z(, z
0
) = ( x(, z
0
), p(, z
0
)) satises the implicit functions theorem
when the algebraic equations
x(, z
0
) = x B(x
0
, ) R
n
are involved,Find a smooth mapping
= (x) : B(z
0
, 2)
such that
x((x), z
0
) = x
and dene
p(x) = p((x), z
0
), x B(x
0
, ) R
n
Then (2.141) written for = (x) becomes
H
0
(x, p(x)) = const = H
0
(x
0
, p
0
), x B(x
0
, ) (2.142)
and p(x) : B(x
0
, ) R
n
is the standard solution. Assuming that (2.142)is established
it implies that p(x) : x B(x
0
, ) is a smooth solution of the following system of
the rst order causilinear equations
x
H
0
(x, p(x)) + [
x
p
(x)]
.
p
H
0
(x, p(x)) = 0, x B(x
0
, ) (2.143)
whose solution is dicult to be obtained using characteristic system method. In ad-
dition,if [
x
p(x)] is a symmetric matrix (p(x) =
x
u(x), u (
2
(D; R)) then the rst
order system (2.143) becomes
_
_
_
_
_
_
x1
H
0
(x, p(x))
.
.
.
xn
H
0
(x, p(x))
_
_
_
_
_
_
+
_
_
_
_
_
_
<
x
p
1
(x)
p
H
0
(x, p(x)) >
.
.
.
<
x
p
n
(x)
p
H
0
(x, p(x)) >
_
_
_
_
_
_
= 0 (2.144)
for any x B(x
0
, ) R
n
, where p(x) = (p
1
(x), ..., p
n
(x)). In this case, the smooth
mapping y = p(x), x B(x
0
, ), can be viewed as a coordinate transformation in R
n
such that any local solution ( x(t, ), p(t, )) of the Hamilton system
_
dx
dt
=
p
H
0
(x, p) x(0) = B(x
0
, a) B(x
0
, )
dp
dt
=
x
H
0
(x, p) p(0) = p(); t (, ) = I
(2.145)
has the property p(t, ) = p( x(t, )), (t, ) I
B(x
0
, a).
2.3.6 Some Problems
Problem 1. For the linear equation H
0
(x, p) =< p, f
0
(x) >= c dene an extended
parameterized solution
Z
e
(, z
0
) = ( x(, z
0
), p(, z
0
), u(, z
0
)) R
2n+1
, =
m
1
[a
i
, a
i
]
such that
u(, z
0
) = [ p(, z
0
)]
x(, z
0
) (2.146)
where z
0
= (x
0
, p
0
, u
0
).
Hint. Dene the extended vector elds
Z
e
i
(
(R
2n+1
, R
2n+1
)Z
e
i
(z
e
) =
_
Z
i
(x, p)
H
i
(x, p)
_
, z
e
= (x, p, u) = (z, u)
where H
i
(x, p) =< p, f
i
(x) > and Z
i
(x, p) = T
z
H
i
(x, p), z = (x, p), i 1, ..., m,
where the matrix T is dened in (2.112). Assume the hypothesis (2.116) of section
2.4.4 fullled and dene the orbit
Z
e
(, z
0
) = G
e
1
(t
1
) ... G
e
m
(t
m
)(z
0
), = (t
1
, ..., t
m
) =
m
1
[a
i
, a
i
] (2.147)
where G
e
i
()(y
e
) is the ow generated by Z
e
i
. Prove that under the hypothesis as-
sumed in proposition (2.3.11) we get z
e
(, z
0
) : as a parameterized solution
of the linear equation H
0
(x, p) = const satised the conclusion (2.146)
Problem 2. For the nonlinear equation H
0
(x, p) = const dene an extended param-
eterized solution
z
e
(, z
e
0
) = ( x(, z
e
0
), p(, z
e
0
)), u(, z
e
0
) R
2n+1
, =
m
1
[a
i
, a
i
]
such that
u(, z
0
) = [ p(, z
0
)]
x(, z
0
), where Z
e
0
= (x
0
, p
0
, u
0
) R
2n+1
(2.148)
is xed.
Hint
Z
e
i
(z
e
) =
_
Z
i
(z)
< p, X
i
(z) >
_
where Z
i
(z)
_
X
i
(z)
P
i
(z)
_
(2.149)
is obtained from a smooth H
i
(
(R
2n
, R) as follows
Z
i
(z) = T
z
H
i
(z), i 1, ..., m
given in (2.130) dened the extended orbit
z
e
(, z
e
0
) = G
e
1
(t
1
) ... G
e
m
(t
m
)(z
e
0
), = (t
1
, ..., t
m
) =
m
1
[a
i
, a
i
] (2.150)
where G
e
i
()(y
e
) is the local ow Z
e
i
. Assume that
Z
e
1
(z
e
), ..., Z
e
m
(z
e
) : z
e
B(z
0
, 2) R
2n+1
(2.151)
(B(z
0
, 2); R) and then prove the corresponding proposition
(2.3.14) of assuming that replaces the condition (2.132).
2.4 Overdetermined system of First Order PDE and
Lie Algebras of Vector Fields
As one may expect, a system of rst order partial dierential equations
<
x
S(x), g
i
(x) >= 0, i 1, ..., m g
i
(
(R
n
, R
n
) (2.152)
has a nontrivial solution S (
2
(B(z
0
, ) R
2n
) provided S is nonconstant on the
ball B(z
0
, ) R
2n+1
and
dimL(g
1
, ..., g
m
(x
0
)) = k < n (2.153)
Here L(g
1
, ..., g
m
) (
(R
n
, R
n
) is the Lie algebra determined by the given vector
elds g
1
, ..., g
m
(
(R
n
, R
n
), it can be viewed as the smallest Lie algebra
(
(R
n
, R
n
) containing g
1
, ..., g
m
.
Denition 2.4.1. A real algebra (
(R
n
, R
n
) is Lie algebra if the multiplication
operation among vector elds X, Y (
(R
n
, R
n
) is given by the corresponding Lie
bracket [X, Y ](x) =
Y
x
(x)X(x)
X
x
(x)Y (x), x R
n
. By a direct computation we
may convince ourselves that the following two properties are valid
[X, Y ] = [Y, X], X, Y
and
[X, [Y, Z]] + [Z, [X, Y ]] + [Y, [Z, X]] = 0, X, Y, Z
(Jacobi s identity)
Remark 2.4.2. The system (2.152) is overdetermined when m > 1. Usually a non-
trivial solution S(x), x B(x
0
, ) satises the system (2.152) only on a subset
2.4. OVERDETERMINED SYSTEM OF 1ST O.PDE & LIE ALGEBRAS 71
M
x0
B(x
0
, ) R
n
, which can be structured as a smooth manifold satisfying
dimM
x0
= k (see (2.153)); it will be deduced from an orbit of local ows.
Denition 2.4.3. Let (
(R
n
, R
n
) be a Lie algebra and x
0
R
n
xed. By an
orbit of the origin x
0
of we mean a mapping (nite composition of ows)
G(p, x
0
) = G
1
(t
1
) .... G(t
k
)(x
0
) , p = (t
1
, t
k
) D
k
=
k
1
[a
i
, a
i
] (2.154)
where G
i
(t)(x), t (a
i
, a
i
), x V (x
0
), is the local ow generated by some g
i
, i
1...k.
Denition 2.4.4. We say that (
(R
n
, R
n
)is nitely generated with respect to
the orbits of the origin x
0
R
n
, (f, g, 0, x
0
) if Y
i
, ..., Y
m
will exist such that
any Y along on arbitrary orbit G(p, x
0
), p D
k
can be written
Y (G(p, x
0
)) =
M
j=1
a
j
(p)Y
j
(G(p, x
0
)) (2.155)
with a
j
(
(D
k
, R)depending on Y and G(p, x
0
), p D
k
; Y
I
, ...Y
M
will be
called a system of generators.
Remark 2.4.5. It is easily seen that g
1
, ..g
m
(
(R
n
), R
n
) in involution de-
termine a Lie algebra L(g
I
, ..g
m
) which is (f.g.o.x
0
) for any x
o
R
n
, where the
involution properly means [g
i
, ..., g
j
](x) =
m
k=1
a
k
ij
(x)g
k
(x) , i, j 1, ...m for some,
a
k
ij
in(
(R
n
), g
1
, ..., g
m
will be a system of generators. A nontrivial solution of the
system (1) will be constructed assuming that
L(g
1
, ...g
m
) is a (f, g, o; x
o
) Lie algebra (2.156)
dimL(g
1
, ...g
m
)(x
0
) = k < n (2.157)
In addition, the domain V (x
0
) R
n
on which a non trivial solution satises(2.152)
will be dened as an orbit starting the origin x
o
R
n
y(p) = G
1
(t
1
... G
M
(t
M
)(x
0
), p = (t
1
, ..., t
M
) D
M
=
M
1
(a
i
, a
i
) (2.158)
where G
i
(t)(x), t (a
i
, a
i
) , x B(x
0
, ) R
n
is the local ow generated by
Y
i
L(g
1
, ..., g
m
), i 1, ..., M.Here Y
1
, ..., Y
M
L(g
1
, ..., g
m
) is xed system
of generators such that
Y
1
(x
0
), ..., Y
k
(x
0
) R
n
(2.159)
are linearly independent and Y
j
(x
0
) = 0, j 1, ..., M
2.4.1 Solution for Linear Homogeneous Over Determined Sys-
tem.
Theorem 2.4.6. Assume that g
1
, ...g
m
(
(R
n
), R
n
) are given such that the hy-
potheses (2.156) and (2.157) are satised. Let Y
1
, .., Y
M
L(g
1
, ..g
m
) be a system
of generators fullling(2.159) and dene
V (x
o
) = x B(x
0
, ) R
n
: x = y(p), p D
M
R
n
(2.160)
where y(p) : D
m
is the orbit dene in(2.158). Then there exists a smooth non-
trivial function
S(x) : B(x
o
, ) R such that the system (2.152) is satised for any x V (x
0
)given
in (2.160),i.e
<
x
S(x), g
i
(x) >= 0 x V (x
0
) i 1, ...m (2.161)
Proof. To prove the conclusion (2.161) we need to show the gradient system associ-
ated with the orbit y(p) : p D
M
dened in (2.158) has a nonsingular algebraic
representation
y(p)
p
= Y
1
(.), X
2
(t
1
, .), ..., X
M
(t
1
, ..., t
Mi
; .)(y(p))
= Y
1
(.), Y
2
(.), ..., Y
M
(y(p))A(p)p D
M
(2.162)
where the smooth matrix A(p) = (a
ij
(p))
i,j{1,M}
satises
A(0) = I
M
, a
ij
(
(D
M
) (2.163)
(seem next theorem). On the other hand, we notice that according to the xed
system of generators Y
1
, ..., Y
M
L(g
1
, ..., g
m
) (see (2.159)), we may and rewrite
the orbit(2.158) as follows
y(p) : p D
M
= y( p) = G
1
(t
1
), ..., G
k
(t
k
)(x
0
) : p = (t
1
, ..., t
k
) D
k
(2.164)
Using a standard procedure we redene
M
x0
= y(p) : p B(0, ) B(x
0
, ) R
n
, where B(0, ) D
k
(2.165)
as a smooth manifold satisfying dimM
x0
= k < n for which there exist n k smooth
functions
j
(
(B(x
0
, )) fullling
_

j
(x) = 0, j k + 1, ..., n, x M
x0
k+1
(x
0
), ...,
x
n
(x
0
) R
n
are linearly independent
(2.166)
Using (2.163) and detA(p) ,= 0 for p in a ball B(0, ) D
M
we nd smooth q
j

2.4. OVERDETERMINED SYSTEM OF 1ST O.PDE & LIE ALGEBRAS 73
C
(B(0, ); R
M
), j 1, .., M, such that
_
A(p)q
j
(p) = e
j
, p B(0, ), l
1
, ..., l
M
R
M
is the canonical basis
y(p)
p
q
j
(p) = Y
j
(y(p)), p B(0, ), j 1, ..., M
(2.167)
Using (2.166) and (2.167) we get
j
(y(p)) = 0, p B(0, ) D
M
, j k + 1, ..., n
and taking the Lie derivatives in the directions q
1
(p), ..., q
M
(p) we obtain
< xj(y( p)), Yi(y( p)) >= 0 p B(0, ) D
k
, i {1, ..., M} j {k + 1, ..., n} (2.168)
By hypothesis, L(g
1
, ..., g
m
) is a (f g o; x
0
) Lie Algebra and each g Lg
1
, ..., g
m
can be written
g(y( p)) =
M
i=1
i
( p)Y
i
(y( p)), p B(0, ) R
k
,
i
(
(B(0, )) (2.169)
Using (2.168) and (2.169) we get
<
x
j
(x), g
i
(x) > = 0 x M
x0
B(0, ) for each
i 1, ..., m and j k + 1, ..., n (2.170)
Here
k+1
(x), ...,
n
(x) : x B(0, ) are (n k) smooth solutions satisfying the
overdetermined system (2.152) along the k-dimensional manifold M
x0
in (2.165). The
proof is complete.
Remark 2.4.7. The nonsingular algebraic representation of a gradient system
y
t
1
= Y
1
(y),
y
t
2
= X
2
(t
1
; y), ...,
y
t
M
= X
M
(t
1
, ..., t
M1
; y) (2.171)
associated with the system of generators Y
1
, ..., Y
M
L(g
1
, ..., g
M
) relies on the
assumption that L(g
1
, ..., g
M
) is a (f g o; x
0
) Lie algebra and the orbit (2.158) is a
solution of (2.171) satisfying y(0) = x
0
. The algorithm of dening a gradient system
for which a given orbit is its solution was initiated in Chapter I of these lectures.
Here we shall use the following formal power series
_
_
X
2
(t
1
; y) = (expt
1
adY
1
)(Y
2
)(y)
X
3
(t
1
, t
2
; y) = (expt
1
adY
1
) (expt
2
adY
2
)(Y
3
)(y)
X
M
(t
1
, t
2
, ..., t
M1
; y) = (expt
1
adY
1
) ... (expt
M1
adY
M1
)(Y
M
)(y)
(2.172)
where the linear mapping adY : L(g
1
, ..., g
M
) L(g
1
, ..., g
M
) is dened by
(adY )(Z)(y) =
Z
y
(y) Y (y)
Y
y
Z(y), y R
n
for eachY, Z L(g1, ..., gM) (2.173)
Actually, the vector elds in the left hand side of (2.172) are well dened by the
following mappings
_
_
X
2
(t
1
; y) = H
1
(t
1
; y
1
)(Y
2
)(G
1
(t
1
; y
1
)), y
1
= y,
X
3
(t
1
, t
2
; y) = H
1
(t
1
; y
1
) H
2
(t
2
; y
2
)(Y
3
)(G
2
(t
2
; y
2
))
X
M
(t
1
, t
2
, ..., t
M1
; y) = H
1
(t
1
; y
1
) H
2
(t
2
; y
2
) ... H
M1
(t
M1
; y
M1
)(Y
M
)(y
M
)
(2.174)
where
G
i
(t
i
; y
i
), t (a
i
, a
i
), x V (x
0
)
is the local ow generated by
Y
i
, H
i
(t, y) = [
G
i
y
(t; y)]
1
and
y
i+1
= G
i
(t
i
; y
i
), 1, ..., M 1, where y
1
= y.
The formal writing (2.172) is motivated by the explicit computation we can perform
using exponential formal series and noticing that the Taylor series associated with
(2.172) and (2.174) coincide.
2.5 Nonsingular Algebraic Representation of a
Gradient System
Theorem 2.5.1. Assume that L(g
1
, ..., g
m
) (
(R
n
; R
n
) is a (f go; x
0
) Lie algebra
and consider Y
1
, ..., Y
M
L(g
1
, ..., g
M
) as a xed system of generators. Dene
the orbit y
p
: p D
M
as in (2.158) and associate the gradient system (2.171)
where X
2
(t
1
; y), ..., X
M
(t
1
, t
2
, ..., t
M1
; y) are dened in (2.174). Then there exist
an (M M) nonsingular matrix A(p) = (a
ij
(p))
i,j{1,...,M}
, a
ij
(
(B(0, ) R
n
)
such that
{Y1()X2(t1; ), ..., XM(t1, ..., tM1; )}(y(p)) = {Y1(), Y2(), ..., YM()}(y(p))A(p) (2.175)
for any p B(0, ) R
n
, and A(0) = I
M
Proof. Using the (f g o; x
0
) property of Lie algebra L(g
1
, ..., g
M
we x the following
(M M) smooth matrices B
i
(p), p D
M
, such that
adY
i
Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y(p)) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y(p)) B
i
(p), i 1, ..., M (2.176)
where Y
1
, ..., Y
M
L(g
1
, ..., g
m
) is a xed system of generators. Let Z
1
(t
1
, ..., t
M
) :
2.5. NONSINGULAR REPRESENTATION OF A GRADIENT SYSTEM 75
t [0, t
1
] be the matrix solution
dZ
1
dt
= Z
1
B
1
(t
1
t, t
2
, ..., t
M
), Z
1
(0) = I
M
(identity) (2.177)
The standard Picards method of approximations applied in (2.177) allows one to
write the solution z, (t
1
, ..., t
M
) : t [0, t
1
] as a convergent Volterra series, and by
a direct computation we obtain
X
2
(t
1
; y(p)) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y(p))z
1
(t
1
, t
2
, ..., t
M
)e
2
(2.178)
where X
2
(t
1
; y) is dened in (2.174) and e
1
, ..., e
M
R
n
is the canonical basis.
More precisely, denote
N
1
(t; y) = H
1
(t; y)Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(G
1
(t; y))andX
2
(t
1
; y) (2.179)
can be written
X
2
(t
1
; y) = N
1
(t
1
; y)e
2
(2.180)
Then we noticed that N
1
(t; y(p)), t [0, t
1
] satises
dN
1
dt
= N
1
B
1
(t
1
t, t
2
, ..., t
M
), N
1
(0) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y(p)) (2.181)
where the matrix B
1
(p) is xed in (2.121) and satises
adY
i
Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(G
1
(t; y)) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(G
1
(t; y)) B
1
(t
1
t, t
2
, ..., t
M
) (2.182)
for y = y(p). The same method of Approximation shows that a convergent sequence
N
k
1
(t) : t [0, t
1
]
k0
can be constructed such that
_
_
_
N
0
1
(t) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y(p)) = N
1
(0)
N
k+1
1
(t) = N
1
(0)+,
t
_
0
N
k
1
(s)B
1
(t
1
s, t
2
, ..., t
M
)ds, k = 0, 1, 2, ...
(2.183)
It is easily seen that
N
k+1
1
(t) = N
1
(o)Z
k+1
1
(t; t
1
, ..., t
M
), t [0, t
1
] (2.184)
where Z
k
1
(t; t
1
, ..., t
M
) : t [0, t
1
]
k0
denes a solution in (2.177) and
lim
k
Z
k
1
(t; t
1
, ..., t
M
) = Z
1
(t; t
1
, ..., t
M
) (2.185)
uniformly int [0, t
1
]. Therefore using (2.184) and (2.185) we get that
N
1
(t) = lim
k
N
k
1
(t) , t [0, t
1
] (2.186)
is the solution in (2.181) fullling
N
1
(t; y) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y)Z
1
(t; t
1
, ..., t
M
), t [0, t
1
] (2.187)
if y = y(p), and (2.178) holds. The next vector eld X
3
(t
1
, t
2
; y) in (2.119) can be
represented similarly and rewriting it as
X
3
(t
1
, t
2
; y) = H
1
(t
1
; y)
X
3
(t
2
; y
2
), for y
1
= y(p) = y (2.188)
y
2
= G
1
(t
1
; y
1
) = G
2
(t
2
) ... G
M
(t
M
)
and
X
3
(t
2
; y
2
) = H
2
(t
2
; y
2
)Y
3
(G
2
(t
2
, y
2
)) (2.189)
can be represented using the same algorithm as in (2.178) and we get
X
3
(t
2
; y
2
) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y
2
)Z
2
(t
2
; t
2
, ..., t
M
)e
3
(2.190)
Here the nonsingular and smooth M M Z
2
(t; t
2
, ..., t
M
: t [0, t
2
] is the unique
solution of the following linear matrix system
dZ
2
dt
= Z
2
B
2
(t
2
t, t
3
, ..., t
M
), Z
2
(0) = I
M
(2.191)
where B
2
(t
2
, ..., t
M
) p D
M
is xed such that
adY
2
Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y
2
) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y
2
)B
2
(t
2
, ..., t
M
), p D
M
(2.192)
Denote
N
2
(t, y
2
) = H
(t,y2)
Y
1
, ..., Y
M
G
2
(t; y
2
), t [0, t
2
] (2.193)
and we obtain
x
3
(t
2
; y
2
) = N
2
(t
2
; y
2
)e
3
= Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y
2
)Z
2
(t
2
; t
2
, ..., t
M
)e
3
(2.194)
That is to say, N
2
(t; y
2
) : t [0, t
2
] as a solution of
dN
2
dt
= N
2
B
2
(t
2
t, t
3
, ..., t
M
), N
2
(0) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y
2
) (2.195)
can be represented using a standard iterative procedure and we get
N
2
(t; y
2
) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y
2
)Z
2
(t; t
2
, ..., t
M
) , t [0, t
2
] (2.196)
where the matrix Z
2
is the solution in(2.191). Now we use (2.194) into (2.188) and
taking into account that y
2
= G
1
(t
1
, y
1
) we rewrite
H
1
(t
1
; y
1
)Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(G
1
(t
1
, y
1
)) = N
1
(t
1
; y
1
) for y
1
= y(p) (2.197)
where N
1
(t; y(p)) : t [0, t
1
] fullls(2.187). Therefore the vector eld X
3
(t
1
, t
2
; y)
in (2.174) satises
X
3
(t
1
, t
2
; y) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y)Z(t
1
, t
1
, ..., t
M
) Z
2
(t
2
; t
2
, ..., t
M
)e
3
(2.198)
for y = y(p). An induction argument will complete the proof and each X
j
(p
j
; y) in
2.6. 1ST ORDER EVOLUTION SYSTEM OF PDE AND C-K THEOREM 77
(2.174) gets the corresponding representation
X
j+1
(p
j+1
; y) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y)Z(t
1
, t
1
, ..., t
M
) ... Z
j
(t
j
; t
j
, ..., t
M
)e
j+1
(2.199)
if y = y(p) and Z
j
(t, t
j
, ..., t
M
: t [0, t
j
]) j 2, ..., M 1 is the solution of the
linear matrix equation
dZ
j
dt
= Z
j
B
j
(t
j
t, t
j+1
, ..., t
M
), Z
j
(0) = I
M
(2.200)
Here the smooth matrix B
j
(t
j
, ...., t
M
) , p D
M
, is xed such that
adY
j
Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y
j
) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y
j
)B
j
(t
j
, ..., t
M
) (2.201)
where y
j
= G
j
(t
j
) ... G
M
(t
M
)(x
0
) , j = 1, ..., M. Now, for simplicity, denote the
M M smooth matrix
Z
j
(p) = Z
1
(t
1
; t
1
, ..., t
M
) ... Z
j
(t
j
; t
j
, ..., t
M
), p = (t
1
, ..., t
M
) D
M
(2.202)
j 1, ..., M 1 and X
j+1
(p
j+1
; y)
in (2.199) is written as
X
j+1
(p
j+1
; y) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y)Z
j
(p)e
j+1
, if y = y(p), p D
M
(2.203)
In addition, dene the smooth (M M)
A(p) = (e
1
, Z
1
(p)e
2
, ..., Z
M1
(p)e
M
), p D
M
(2.204)
which fullls A(0) = I
M
and represent the gradient system (2.171) as follows
Y
1
(.), X
2
(t
1
, .), ..., X
M
(t
1
, ..., t
M1
, .)(y) = Y
1
, ..., Y
M
(y)A(p) (2.205)
if y = y(p), and the smooth (M M) matrix A(p) is dened in (2.204). The proof is
complete.
2.6 First Order Evolution System of PDE and Cauchy-
Kowalevska Theorem
We consider an evolution system of PDE of the following form
_
_
_
t
u
j
=
n
i=1
N
k=1
a
i
jk
(t, x, u)
i
u
k
+b
j
(t, x, u), j = 1, ..., N
u(0, x) = u
0
(x)
(2.206)
where u = (u
1
, ..., u
N
) is an unknown vector function depending on the time variable
t R and x R
n
. The system (2.206) will be called rst order evolution system of
PDE and without losing generality we may assume u
0
= 0 (see the transformation
u = u u
0
) and the coecients a
k
ij
, b
j
not depend on the variable t(see u
N+1
=
t,
t
u
N+1
= 1). The notations used in (2.206) are the usual ones
t
u =
u
t
,
i
u =
u
xi
, i 1, ..., n. Introducing a new variable z = (x, u) B(0, ) R
n+N
, we
rewrite the system (2.206) as follows
_
_
_
t
u
j
=
n
i=1
N
k=1
a
i
jk
(z)
i
u
k
+b
j
(z), j = 1, ..., N
u(0) = 0
(2.207)
Everywhere in this section we assume that the coecients a
i
jk
, b
j
(
w
(B(0, )
R
n+N
) are analytic functions, i.e the corresponding Taylors series at z = 0 is conver-
gent in the ball B(0, ) R
n+N
(Brook Taylor 1685-1731)
2.6.1 Cauchy-Kowalevska Theorem
Theorem 2.6.1. Assume that
a
i
jk
, b
j
(
w
(B(o, )) R
n+N
for any
i 1, ..., n, k, j 1, ..., n +N
Then the evolution system (2.207) has an analytical solution u (
w
(B(o, a)) R
n+1
and it is unique with respect to analytic functions.
Proof. Without restricting generality we assume n = 1 and write a
jk
= a
1
jk
. The main
argument of the proof uses the property that the coecients c
i
lk
from the associated
Taylors series
u
i
(t, x) =
l,k=0
c
i
lk
t
l
x
k
=
l.k=0
t
l
x
k
l!k!
[

k+l
t
l
x
k
u
i
(t, x)]
t=0,x=0
(2.208)
are uniquely determined by the evolution system(2.207) and its analytic coecients.
Then using an upper bound for the coecients c
i
lk
, we prove that the series (2.208)
is convergent. In this respect we notice that
[

m
x
m
u
i
(t, x)]
t=0
= 0 for any m 0 (2.209)
(see u
o
(x) = 0) using (2.207) we nd the partial derivatives
u
i
t
(o, x),

2
u
i
tx
(o, x),

2
u
i
t
2
(o, x),

3
u
i
t
2
x
(o, x),

3
u
i
x
2
(o, x) (2.210)
and so on which are entering in (2.208), for each i i, ...N. If
a
jk
(z) =
||=0
g
jk
andbj [ z [=
||=0
h
j
x
z
(2.211)
for [ z [ , = (
i
, ..
N+1
), [ [=
i
+....
N+1
, and
i
0,
i
integer, the
c
i
lk
= P
i
lk
[(g
jm
)
,j,m
, (h
j
)
,j
] (2.212)
when P
i
lk
is a polynomial with positive coecient( 0). It uses the coecients
e
i
lk
((2.208)) and noticing that by derivation of a product we get only positive co-
ecient. Now we are constructing the upper bound coecient C
i
lk
for C
i
lk
given in
(2.212) such that
i
(t, x) =
l,k=0
C
i
lk
t
l
x
k
, i = 1, 2, ..., N (2.213)
is a local solution of the Cauchy problem.
t
j =
k=1
NA
jk
(z)

x
(k) +B
j
(z),
j
(0, x) = 0, j 1, ..., N (2.214)
Here A
jk
and B
j
must be determined such that
A
jk
(z) =
||=0
G
jk
, B
j
(z) =
||=0
H
j
(2.215)
where [ g
jk
[ G
jk
, [ h
j
[ H
j
Using (2.215), we get

C
i
lk
= P
i
lk
[(G
jm
)
,j,m
, [ H
j
[
,j
] [ P
i
lk
[[ g
jm
[
,j,m
, ([ h
j
)
,j
] [[ c
i
lk
[ (2.216)
and the upper bound coecients C
i
lk
are found provided A
jk
and B
j
are deter-
mined such that the system(2.214) is satised by the analytic solution v(t, x) given
in (2.215). In this respect, we dene the constants G
jk
and H
jk
andH
j
using the
following estimates
M
1
= max [ a
jk
(z) [, M = max [ b
j
(z) [ j, k = 1, ...N [ Z [ (2.217)
we get
_
[ g
jk
[
M1
||

M1
||
||!
!
= G
jk
[ h
j
[
M2
||

M2
||
||!
!
= H
j
(2.218)
A
jk
(z) =
||=0
M
[ [!
!
(
z
= M
||=0
1
||
[ [!
!
z
= M[1
z
1
+... +z
N+1
]
1
, for [ z
1
[ +...+ [ z
N+1
[< (2.219)
B
j
(z) =
||=0
H
jk
= M[1
z
1
+... +z
N+1
]
1
, for [ z
1
[ +...+ [ z
N+1
[< (2.220)
Here we have used
||=k
k!
!
Z
= (
N+1
i=1
z
i
)
k
, ! = (
1
!)...(
N+1
!), z
= z
1
1
...Z
N+1
N+1
(2.221)
Notice that the coecients A
jk
, B
j
do not depend on (j, k) and each component
i
(t, x) can be taken equals to w(t, x) , i 1, ..., N, where w(t, x) satises the
following scalar equation
t
w =
M
x Nw
(1 +N
x
w), w(0, x) = 0 for [ x [ +N [ w [< (2.222)
by a direct inspection we notice that for x R
n
we need to replace x R in (2.222)
by x y =
n
1
x
i
where x = (x
1
, ...x
n
) and w(t, x) w(t,
n
1
x
i
) The solution of
(2.222) can be represented by
W(t, x) =
1
2N
[ x
_
( x)
2
4MNt], if [ x [<

(2.223)
and
t <

16MN
= T(M, )
In the case x R
n
we use y = (
n
1
x
i
) instead of x R and w(t, y) satisfy both the
equation (2.222) and the representation formula(2.223).
2.6.2 1st Order Evolution System of Hyperbolic & Elliptic
Equations
In the following we shall rewrite some hyperbolic and elliptic equation appearing in
Mathematical Physics as an evolution system of rst order equation. It suggest that
assuming only analytic cocients we may and do solve these equations applying the
Cauchy-Kowalevska theorem (C-K)
(E
1
). Klein-Gordon equations(D.B Klein 1894-1977, W.Gordon 1893-1939)
They are describing the evolution of a wave function y associated with a vanishinq
spinparticle and in dierential form is expressed using standard notations, as follows
_

2
t
y = y my +f(y,
t
y,
x
y), m > 0, t 0, y R
y(0, x) = y
0
(x) =
t
y(0, x) = y
1
(x), x R
n
(2.224)
where
t
y =
y
t
,
x
y = (
1
y, ...,
n
y),
i
y =
y
xi
and
the laplacian y =
n
2
i
y. Denote
u = (
x
y,
t
y, y) R
n+2
, u
0
(x) = (
x
y
0
(x), y
1
(x), y
0
(x))
and F(u) = f(y,
t
y,
x
y). Then (2.224) is written as an evolution system
_
_
_
_
_
_
t
u
j
=
j
u
n+1
, j 1, ..., n
t
u
n+1
n
i=1
i
u
i
+ F(u)
t
u
n+2
= u
n+1
u(0, x) = u
0
(x)
_
_
_
_
_
_
(2.225)
(E
2
). Maxwell equations(J.C.Maxwell 1831-1879)
Denote the electric eld E(t, x) R
3
, x R
3
, t R, the magnetic eld H(t, x)
R
3
, x R
3
, t R and the Maxwell equations are the following
_
(E)
E

t
E H = 0, E(0, x) = E
0
(xs)
(H)
H

t
H + E = 0, H(0, x) = H
0
(x)
_
(2.226)
where D = (E) and B = (H) are some nonlinear mappings satisfying
(E), (H) : R
3
R (2.227)
are analytic functions with uniformly positive denite matrices
(E)
E
,
(H)
H
for E, H
in bounded sets. In addition, we assume
(E) =
0
E +O([ E [
3
), (H)
=
0
H +O([ H [
3
) with
0
> 0,
0
> 0 (2.228)
(E) =
0
E + O([ E [
3
), (H) =
0
H +O([ H [
3
) with
0
> 0,
0
> 0 (2.229)
divD(t, x) = 0, divB(t, x) = 0, D(0, x) = D
0
(x), B(0, x) = B
0
(x) (2.230)
where D(t, x) = (E(t, x)) and B(t, x) = (H(t, x)). The vectorial products H
and E are given formally by the corresponding determinant
E = det
_
_
i j k
1

2

3
H
1
H
2
H
3
_
_
= i(
2
H
3
3
H
2
)+j(
3
H
1
1
H
3
)+k(
1
H
2
2
H
1
)
(2.231)
E = det
_
_
i j k
1

2

3
E
1
E
2
E
3
_
_
= i(
2
E
3
3
E
2
) +j(
3
E
1
1
E
3
) +k(
1
E
2
2
E
1
)
(2.232)
where (i, j, k) R
3
is the canonical basis. Denote u = (E, H) R
6
and the system
(2.226) for which the assumptions (2.227), (2.229) and (2.230) are valid will be written
as an evolution system
t
u =
3
j=1
[A
0
(u)]
1
A
j
j
u, u(0, x) = u
0
(x) = (E
0
(x), H
0
(x)) (2.233)
where (6 6) matrices A
i
are given by
A
0
(u) =
_
(E)
E
O
3
O
3
(H)
H
_
, A
1
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0 0 0
O
3
0 0 1
0 1 0
0 0 0
0 0 1 O
3
0 1 0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
A
2
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0 0 1
O
3
0 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 1
0 0 1 O
3
1 0 0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
, A
3
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0 1 0
O
3
1 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
1 0 1 O
3
0 0 0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
where O
3
is (3 3) zero matrix, A
0
(u) is strictly positive denite matrix and each A
i
is a symmetric matrix. Recalling that Maxwell equation means the evolution system
with analytic coecients (2.233) and, in addition the constraints (2.230), we notice
that (2.230) are satised, provide
divD
0
(x) = 0 and divB
0
(x) = 0 (2.234)
In this respect, we rewrite the original system (2.226) as
t
DH = 0,
t
B + E0, D(0, x) = D
0
(x), B(0, x) = B
0
(x) (2.235)
and by a direct computation we get
_

t
[divD(t, x)] = div[
t
D](t, x) = div(H)(t, x) = 0
t
[divB(t, x)] = div[
t
B](t, x) = div(E)(t, x)
(2.236)
which show that (2.234) implies the constraints (2.230)
2.7. (E
3
) PLATE EQUATIONS 83
2.7 (E
3
) Plate Equations
(they cannot be solved by (C-K) theorem). They are described by the following
equation
2
t
y +
2
y = f(
t
y,
2
x
y) +
n
i=1
b
i
(
t
y,
2
x
y)
i
(
t
y), x R
n
(2.237)
where f and b
i
are analytic functions, and y(t, x) R satises Cauchy conditions.
y(0, x) = y
0
(x),
t
y(0, x) = y
1
(x) (2.238)
Here is the standard laplacian operator,
x
is the gradient acting as linear map-
pings for which
2
and
2
x
have the usual meaning. Denote
u = (
2
x
y,
x
(
t
y),
t
y) = (u
1
, . . . , u
n
2, u
n
2
+1
, . . . , u
n
2
+n
, u
n
2
+n+1
)
= (y
11
, y
12
, . . . , y
n1
, . . . , y
1n
, y
2n
, . . . , y
nn
, u
n
2
+1
, . . . , u
n
2
+n
, u
n
2
+n+1
) R
n
2
+n+1
as the unknown vector function, where (nn) matrix
2
x
y is denoted as a rowvec-
tor (y
11
, . . . , y
nn
) R
n
2
. By a direct inspection we see that
_
t
y
ij
=
i
j
u
n
2
+n + 1 =
i
u
n
2
+j
, i, j 1, . . . , n
t
u
n
2
+n+1
=
n
i=1
(y
ii
) +F(u)
t
u
n
2
+j
=
j
(
t
u
n
2
+n+1
) =
n
i=1
j
(y
ii
) +
n
2
+n+1
k=1
u
k
F(u)
j
u
k
u(0, x) = (
2
x
y
0
(x),
x
, y
1
(x), y
1
(x)) = u
0
(x)
(2.239)
where F(u) = f(u
n
2
+n+1
,
2
x
y) +
n
i=1
b
i
(u
n
2
+n+1
,
2
x
y)u
n
2
+i
. As far as the system
(2.239) contains laplacian in the right hand side it cannot be asimilated with a
rst order evolution system. Actually, it is well known that a parabolic equation
has no rewriting as a rst order evolution system and show that the simplest plate
equations.
2
t
y +
2
y = 0 y(0, x) = y
0
(x),
t
y(0, x = y
1
(x)) (2.240)
are equivalent with a parabolic type equation (Schrodinger)
_

t
w = iw(or i
t
w(t, x) =
x
w(t, x))
w(o, x) = y
1
(x) +iy
0
(x) = w
0
(x)
(2.241)
Remark 2.7.1. Let y(t, x) be the analytic solution of the plate equation (4). Dene
the analytic function w(t, x) =
t
y(t, x) + i
x
y(t, x) C. Then w(t, x) : (t, x)
D R
n+1
satises Schr odinger (S) equation (2.241) and initial condition w(o, x) =
y
1
(x) +iy
0
(x) = w
0
(x). Conversely, if w(t, x) = y(t, x) + iz(t, x) satises (2.241)
then Rew(t, x) 4 = y(t, x) and Imw(t, x) = z(t, x) are real analytic solution for the
homogeneous equation of the plate(2.240) with Cauchy conditions y(0, x) = y
0
(x) and
z(0, x) = z
0
(x) correspondingly. Moreover, the solution of the Schr odinger equation
(2.241) agrees with the following representation w(t, x) = u(it, x) where u(, x) =
(4)
n
2
_
R
n
[exp()]u
0
(y)dy and we get i
t
w(t, x) =
u(it, x) =
x
u(it, x) =
x
w(t, x) (S-equation).
2.7.1 Exercises
(1) Using the algorithm for Klein-Gordon equation, write the evolution system cor-
responding to the following system of hperbolic equations
2
t
y
i
=
n
m,j,k=1
C
imjk
(
x
y)
m
k
y
j
, i = 1, ..., n, y = (y
1
, ..., y
n
)
y
i
(0, x) = y
0
i
(x) ,
t
y
i
(0, x) = y
1
i
(x) , i = 1, ..., n, x R
n
(it appears in elasticity eld)
Hint.
x
y = (
x
y
1
, ...,
x
y
n
) ,
x
y
i
= (
1
y
i
, ...,
n
y
i
) , j 1, ..., n
Denote u
ik
y =
k
y
i
(t, x) , k 1, ..., n , i 1, ..., n
u
n
2
+i
=
t
y
i
, i 1, ..., n
u
n
2
+n+i
= y
i
, i 1, ..., n
we get
_
t
u
ik
=
k
t
y
i
=
x
k
u
n
2
+i
i 1, ..., n
t
u
n
2
+i
=
2
t
=
n
m,j,k=1
C
imjk
(u
11
, ..., u
nn
)
xm
(u
kk
) , i 1, ..., n
t
u
n
2
+n+i
=
t
y
i
= u
n
2
+i
, i 1, ..., n
(2) Using (C-K) theorem solve the following elliptic equation
2
x
+
2
y
= x
2
+y
2
, u(0, y) =
x
u(0, y) = 0
Hint. Denote t = x,
y
u = u
1
,
x
u = u
2
, u = u
3
and we get
_

t
u
1
=
y
(
t
u) =
y
u
2
u
1
(0, y) = 0
,
_

t
u
2
=
2
x
u =
y
u
1
+t
2
+y
2
u
2
(0, y) = 0
,
_

t
u
3
= u
2
u
3
(0, y) = 0
We are looking for
u
3
(t, y) = u
3
(0, y) +
t
1!
t
u
3
(0, y) +
t
2
2!
2
t
u
3
(0, y) +...
2.7. (E
3
) PLATE EQUATIONS 85
Now compute
u
3
(0, y) = 0 ,
t
u
3
[
t=0
= u
2
[
t=0
= 0 ,
2
t
u
3
[
t=0
=
t
u
2
[
t=0
= y
2
,
k
t
u
3
[
t=0
for k 3. We obtain u(x, y) = u
3
(x, y) =
1
2
x
2
y
2
(3) by the same method solve
2
x
+
2
y
= y
2
, u(0, y) =
x
u(0, y) = 0
and get
u(x, y) =
x
2
y
2
2

x
4
12
2.7.2 The Abstract Cauchy-Kawalewska Theorem
(L.Nirenberg, J.Di.Geometry 6(1972)pp 561-576)
For 0 < s < 1, let X
s
be the space of vectorial functions (x) C
n
which are
holomorphic and bounded on D
s
=
j=1
[ x
j
[< sR C
d
. Denote | |
s
= sup
Ds
[
(x) [. Then X
s
is a Banach space and the natural inspection X
s
X
s
(s
s) has
the norm | i | 1. By the standard estimates of the derivatives (see Cauchy formula),
we get |
j
|
s
R
1
| |
s
(s s
) for any 0 < s
< s < 1 and for a linear equation

the following holds true
Theorem 2.7.2. Let A(t) : X
s
: X
s
be linear and continuous of [ t [< for any
0 < s
< 1 fullling
(i
1
) | A(t)v |
s
C | v |
ss
, 0 < s
< s < 1
Let f(t) be a continuous mapping of [ t [< with values in X
s
, 0 < s < 1 fullling
(i
2
) | f(t) |
s
K
a(1 s)
, for 0 < s < 1
where 0 < a <
1
8K
is xed and K > 0 is given constant. Then there exists a unique
function u(t) which is continuously dierentiable of [ t [< a(1 s) with values in X
s
for each 0 < s < 1, fullling
(C
1
)
du
dt
(t) = A(t)u(t), u(0) = 0
(C
2
) | u(t) |
s
2K(
a(1s)
|t|
1)
1
for any [ t [< a(1 s).
Theorem 2.7.3. The nonlinear case is refering to the following Cauchy problem
()
du
dt
= F(u(t), t) [ t [< , u(0) = 0
Let the condition (
1
) and(
5
) be fullled. Then there exists a > 0 and a unique
function u(t) which is continuously dierentiable of [ t [< a(1 s) with values in X
s
fullling the equation () and | u(t) |
s
< R [ t [< a(1 s), for each 0 < s < 1.
2.8 Appendix Innitesimal Invariance
J.R.Olver (Application 0f Lie algebra to Di.Eq, Springer, 1986, Graduate texts in
mathematics; 107)
1. One can replace the complicated, nonlinear conditions for the invariance of a
subset or function under a group of transformations by an equivalent linear condition
of innitesimal invariance under the corresponding innitesimal generators of the
group action. It will provide the key to the explicit determination of the symmetry
groups of systems of dierential equations. We begin with the simpler case of an
invariant function under the ow generated by a vector eld which can be expressed
as follows
f(G(t; x)) = f(x), t (a, a) x D R
n
(2.242)
g(f)(x) =<
x
f(x), g(x) >= 0, x D. (2.243)
where G(0; x) = x,
dG(t;x)
dt
= g(G(t; x)), t (a, a), x D
Theorem 2.8.1. Let G be a group of transformation acting on a domain D R
n
.
Let F : D R
m
, m n, dene a system of algebraic equations of maximal rank
(F
j
(x) = 0, j = 1, ..., m) ; rank
F
x)
x) = m, x D, F(x) = 0 (2.244)
Then G is a symmetry group of system iff
g(F
j
)(x) = 0, x y D : F(y) = 0, j = 1, 2, ..., m (2.245)
where g is the innitesimal generators of G.
Proof. The necessity of (2.245) follows by dierentiating the identity F(G(t; x)) =
0, t (a, a) in which x is solution of(2.244) and G(t; x) , t (a, a), is the ow
generated by the vector eld g. To prove the suciency, let x
0
be a solution of the
system using the maximal rank condition we can choose a coordinate transformation
y = (y
1
, ..., y
n
) such that x
0
= 0 and F has the simple form F(y) = (y
1
, ..., y
m
). Let
g(y) = (g
1
(y), ..., g
n
(y)) R
n
be any innitesimal generators of G expressed in the
new coordinates and rewrite (2.245) as follows
g
i
(y) = 0 , i = 1, 2, ..., m, y R
n
, y
1
= ... = y
m
= 0 (2.246)
Now the ow G(t)(x
0
), t (a, a) generated by the vector eld g and passing
through x
0
= 0 satises the system of ordinary dierential equations
dG
i
dt
(t)(x
0
) =
2.8. APPENDIX INFINITESIMAL INVARIANCE 87
g
i
(G(t)(x
0
)), G(0)(x
0
) = 0, G
i
(t)(x
0
) = 0, t (a, a), i = 1, ..., m which means
F(G(t)(x
0
)) = 0, t (a, a). The proof is complete.
Example 2.8.1. Let G = SO(2) be the rotation group in the plane, with innitesimal
generator (g = y
x
+x
y
)
g(x, y) = col(y, x). The unit circle S
1
= x
2
+ y
2
= 1 is an invariant subset of
SO(2) as it is the solution set of the invariant function f(x, y) = x
2
+y
2
1. Indeed,
g(f)(x, y) = 2xy+2xy = 0, (x, y) R
2
so the equations (4) are satised on the unit
circle itself. The maximal rank condition does hold for f since its gradient f(x, y) =
col(2x, 2y) does not vanish on S
1
. As a less trivial example,consider the function
f(x, y) = (x
2
+ 1)(x
2
+ y
2
1) and notice that g(f)(x, y) = 2xy(x
2
+ 1)
1
f(x, y)
which shows that g(f)(x, y) = 0 whenever f(x, y) = 0. In addition f(x, y) = (4x
3
+
2xy
2
, 2x
2
y +2y) vanishes only when x = y = 0 which is not a solution to f(x, y) = 0.
We conclude that the solution set (x, y) : (x
2
+1)(x
2
+y
2
1) = 0 is a rotationally-
invariant subset of R
2
.
Remark 2.8.2. For a given one-parameter group of transformations y = G(t)(x), x
D R
n
, t (a, a) generated by the innitesimal generator
g = g
1
(x)
x
1 +... +g
n
(x)
x
n(see
dG(t)(x)
dt
= g(G(t)(x)), t (a, a), G(0)(x) = x
g(x) = col(g
1
(x), ..., g
n
(x)). We notice that the corresponding invariant functions are
determined by the standard rst integrals associated with the ODE
dx
dt
= g(x).
2.8.1 Groups and Dierential Equations
Suppose we are considering a systemS of dierential equation involving p independent
variables x = (x
1
, ..., x
p
) and q dependent variablesu = (u
1
, ..., u
q
). The solution of
the system will be of the form u
= f
(x), = 1, ..., q. Denote X = R

p
, U = R
q
and
a symmetry group of the system S will be a local group of transformations,G, acting
on some open subset M X U in such a way that G transforms solutions of S to
other solutions of S. To proceed rigorously, dene the graph of u = f(x),
f
= (x, f(x)) : x X U
where X is the domain of denition of f. Note that
f
is a certain pdimentional
submanifold of XU. If
f
M
G
(domain of denition of the group transformations
G) then the transform of
f
by G is just
G.
f
= ( x, u) = G(x, u) : (x, u)
f
The set G
f
is not necessarily the graph of another single valued function u =

f( x)
but if it is the case then we write

f = G.f and

f the transform of f by G.
2.8.2 Prolongation
The innitesimal methods for algebraic equations can be extended for systems of
dierential equations. To do this we need to prolong the basic space XU to a space
which also represents the various partial derivatives occurring in the system.If f : X
U is a smooth function,u = f(x) = (f
1
(x), ..., f
q
(x)) there are q.p
k
numbers u
j
=
j
f
(x) needed to represent all dierent k th order derivatives of the components

of f at point x. We let U
k
= R
q
.p
k
be the Euclidean space of this dimension,endowed
with coordinates u
j
corresponding to = 1, ..., q, and all multi-indices J = (j
1
, ..., j
k
)
of order k, designed so as to represent
J
f
(x) =

k
f
(x)
j
1
x

x
j
k
.
Set U
n
= U U
1
... U
n
to be the product space.whose coordinates represents
all the derivatives of functions u = f(x) of all orders from 0 to n. Note that U
n
is
Euclidean space of dimension
q +qp
1
+... +qp
n
= qp
n
Atypical point in U
n
will be denoted by u
n
so u
n
has q.p
n
dierent components u
j
where = 1, ..., q has J sums over all unordered multi-indices J = (j
1
, ..., j
k
) with
1 j
k
p, j
1
+... +j
k
= k and 0 k n. (By convention for k = 0 there is just one
such multi-index,denoted by O, and u
0
just replace to the component u
of u itself)
Example 2.8.2. p = 2, q = 1.Then X = R
2
, (x
1
, x
2
) = (x, y) and U = R has
the single coordinate u. The space U
1
isomorphic to R
2
with coordinates (u
x
, u
y
)
since these represents all the rst order partial derivatives of u with respect to x and
y. Similarly U
2
= R
3
has coordinates (u
xx
, u
xy
, u
yy
) representing the second order
partial derivatives of u, namely

2
u
x
i
y2i
, i = 0, 1, 2. In general, U
k
= R
k+1
, since
there are (k+1) k-th order partial derivatives of u, namely
k
u
x
i
y
ki
, i = 0, 1, .., k. Finally, the space U
2
= U U
1
U
2
= R
6
, with coordinates
u
2
= (u; u
x
, u
y
, u
xx
, u
xy
, u
yy
) represents all derivatives of u with respect tox and y of
order at most 2. Given a smooth function u = f(x) f : X U there is an induced
function u
n
= pr
(n)
f(x) called the n th prolongation of f which is dened by the
equations
u
j
=
J
f
(x), J = (j
1
, ..., j
k
), 1 j
k
p, j
1
+... +j
k
= k, 0 k n
for each = 1, . . . , q (see X = R
p
, U = R
q
).
The total space X U
n
whose coordinates represents the independent variables,the
dependent variables and the derivatives of the dependent variables up to order n is
called the nth order jet space of the underlying space XU (it comes from viewing
pr
(n)
f as a corresponding polynomial degree n associated with its Taylor series ar the
point x)If the dierential equations are dened in some open subset M XU then
we dene the n-jet space M
(n)
= M U
1
, , U
n
of M.
2.8.3 Systems of Dierential Equations
A system S of n th order dierential equation in p independent and q dependent
variables is given as a system of equations
(x, u
(n)
) = 0, nu = 1, . . . , b (2.247)
involving x = (x
1
, . . . , x
p
), u = (u
1
, . . . , u
q
) and the derivatives of u with respect to x
up to order n. The function (x, u
n
) = (
1
(x, u
n
)), . . . ,
l
(x, u
n
), will be assumed
to be smooth in their arguments so can be viewed as a smooth map from the jet
space X U
n
to some l dimensional Euclidean space : X U
n
R
l
.
The dierential equations themselves tell where the given map variables on XU
n
and thus determine a subvariety
S
= (x, u
n
) : (x, u
n
) = 0 X U
n
(2.248)
0n the total jet space.
From this point of view, a smooth solution of the given system of dierential equations
is a smooth function u = f(x) such that
(x, pr
(n)
f(x)) = 0, = 1, ..., l
whenever x lies in the domain of f. This condition is equivalent to the statement that
the graph of the prolongation pr
(n)
f(x) must lies entirely within the subvariety S
determined by the system
(n)
f
= (x, pr
(n)
f(x)) S
= (x, u
(n)
) = 0 (2.249)
We can thus take an n th order system of dierential equations to be a subvariety
S
in the n = jet space X U

n
and a solution to be a function u = f(x) such that
the graph of the n th prolongation pr
(n)
f is contained in the subvariety S
.
Example 2.8.3. Consider Laplace equation in the plane
u
xx
+u
yy
= 0 (2.250)
Here p = 2, q = 1, n = 2 coordinates (x, y, u, u
x
, u
y
, u
xx
, u
xy
, u
yy
) of X U
n
(a
hyperplane)there, and this is the set

for Laplacs equation.A solution must satisfy
2
f
x
2
+

2
f
y
2
= o (x, y)
This is clearly the same as requiring that the graph of the second prolongation pr
2
f
lie in S
. For example, if
f(x, y) = x
3
3xy
2
then
pr
2
f(x, y) = (x
3
3xy
2
; 3x
2
3y
2
, 6xy; 6x, 6y, 6x)
which lies in
S
( see 6x + (6x) = 0)
2.8.4 Prolongation of Group Action and Vector Fields
We begin by considering a simple rst order scalar dierential equation
du
dx
= F(x, u), (x, u) D R
2
(2.251)
This condition is invariant under a one-parameter group of transformations
G() = expg dened on an open subset D U = R
2
where
g = (x, u)
x
+(x, u)
u
(2.252)
is the innitesimal generator.
Let u = u(x; x
0
, u
0
) be s solution of (2.251) satisfying u(x; x
0
, u
0
) = u
0
and (x
0
, u
0
)
D arbitrarily xed. Then u( x
0
(); x
0
, u
0
) = u
0
(), (a, a)
where
( x
0
(), u
0
()) = G()(x
0
, u
0
)
It leads us to the following equations
du
dx
( x
0
()).
d x
0
d
() =
d u
0
d
() F(x
0
, u
0
).(x
0
, u
0
) = (x
0
, u
0
) (2.253)
for any (x
0
, u
0
) D R
2
.
On the other hand, the equation (2.251) can be viewed as an algebraic constraint
F(x, u) u
x
= 0 (2.254)
on the variables (x, u, u
x
) R
3
and we may do ask to nd a prolonged and parameter
group of transformations G(1)() +expg
(1)
acting on a prolonger subvariety M
(1)
=
X U U
(1)
= R
3
such that the set solution (2.254)is invarient. In this respect,
notice that the new vector eld g
(1)
is a prolongation of the vector eld g given in
(2.252), pr
(1)
g = g
(1)
g
(q)
(x, u, u
x
) = (x, u)
x
+(x, u)
u
+(x, u)
ux
where((x, u), (x, u), ) (2.255)
satises (2.253) (x, u) D R
2
. The set solution(2.254) is invariant under the
innitesimal generator (2.255) iff(f(x, u, u
x
) = F(x, u) u
x
)
(
x
f) + (
u
f) + (
ux
f) = 0 (2.256)
for any (x, u, u
x
) verifying (2.254). An implicit computation of (2.256) show us that
((x, u, u
x
), (x, u), (x, u)) must satisfy the following rst order partial dierential
equation
(x, u, u
x
) =
x
(x, u) + [
u
(x, u)
x
(x, u)]u
x

u
(x, u).u
2
x
(2.257)
Once we found a symmetry group G, the integration of the equation (2.251) may
become a simplex one using elementary operations like integration of a scalar function.
2.8.5 Higher Order Equation
Consider a single n th order dierential equation involving a single dependent vari-
able u
(x, u
(n)
) = (x, u,
du
dx
, . . . ,
d
n
u
dx
n
= 0 x R (2.258)
If we assume that(2.258) does not depend either of u or x then the order of the
equation can be reduced by one. In this respect consider that in (2.258) satised
u
= 0i.e the vector eld g =
u
has a trivial prolongation pr
n
g = g =
u
generating
a corresponding prolonged group of symmetry G
(n)
for the equation
(x, u
1
, ...u
n
= 0) , where u
i
=
d
i
u
dx
i
, i 1, . . . , n1, ...n (2.259)
Denote z =
du
dx
and rewrite (2.259) as
(x, z,
dz
dx
, . . . ,
d
n1
z
dx
) =

(x, z
(n1)
) = 0 (2.260)
Whose solutions provide the general solution for (2.259) and u(x) =
_
x
0
h(y)dy +c is a
solution for (2.259) provided z = h(x) is a solution for (2.260). The second elementary
group of symmetry for (2.258) is obtained assuming that does not depend on x and
write(2.258) as
(u
(n)
) =

(u,
du
dx
, . . . ,
d
n
u
dx
n
) = 0 (2.261)
This equation is clearly invariant under the group of transformations in the
xdirection, with innitesimal generator g =
x
. In order to change this into the
vector eld g =
, corresponding to translations of the dependent variable,it suces

to reverse the rules of dependent and independent variable; we set y = u, = x.
Then compute
du
dy
=
1
d
dy
, using u((y)) = y. Similarly, we get
d
2
u
dx
2
=

y
(
y)
3
, . . . ,
d
n
u
dx
n
=
n
(
(1)
y
, . . . ,
(n)
y
)
and rewrite (2.261) as follows
(u
(n)
) =

(u,
du
dx
, . . . ,
d
n
u
dx
n
) =

(y,
(1)
y
, . . . ,
(n)
y
) = (2.262)
where
(k)
y
=
d
k
dy
k
, k = 1, . . . , n. The equation (2.262) is transformed into a (n1)th
order dierential equation as above denoting
(1)
y
= z as the new unknown function.
The rst part till to Section 2.3 is written following the references [8],[12] and [13].
Section 2.3 contained in a ASSMS preprint (2010). Sections 2.4 and 2.5 are written
following the book in the reference [11]. Sections 2.6 and 2.7 are using more or less
the same presentation as in the reference [12].
Chapter 3
Second Order Partial
Dierential Equations
3.1 Introduction
PDE of second order are written using symbols
t
,
x
,
y
,
z
,
2
t
,
2
x
,
2
y
,
2
z
where t R
is standing for the time variable, (x, y, z) R
3
are space coordinates, and a symbol
s
(
2
s
) represent rst partial derivative with respect to s t, x, y, z (second partial
derivative). There are three types of second order PDE we are going to analyze here
and they are illustrated by the following examples
_
_
_
2
x
u
2
y
u = 0 (hyperbolic) (u(x, y) R, (x, y) R
2
)
u =
2
x
u +
2
y
u = 0 (elliptic) (u(x, y) R, (x, y) R
2
)
t
u =
2
x
u +
2
y
u = u (parabolic) (u(t, x, y) R, t R, (x, y) R
2
)
PDE of second order have a long tradition and we recall the Laplace equation (Pierre
Simon Laplace 1749-1827)
2
x
u +
2
y
u +
2
z
u = u = 0 (elliptic, linear, homogeneous) (3.1)
and its nonhomogeneous version
u =
2
x
u +
2
y
u +
2
t
u = f(x, y, z) (Poisson equation) (3.2)
originate in the Newton universal attraction law (Isaac Newton 1642-1727). Intu-
itively, it can be explained as follows. An attractive body induces a eld of attraction
93
94 CHAPTER 3. SECOND ORDER PDE
where intensity at each point (x, y, z) R
3
is calculated using Newtons formula
u =

_
(x x
0
)
2
+ (y y
0
)
2
+ (z z
0
)
2
where is a constant, = mass of the body, considering that the attractive body is
reduced to the point (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) R
3
. In the case of several attractive bodies which
are placed at the points (x
i
, y
i
, z
i
), i 1, . . . , N, we compute the corresponding
potential function
u =
N
i=1
i
_
(x x
i
)
2
+ (y y
i
)
2
+ (z z
i
)
2
=
N
i=1
i
r(P, P
i
)
where
P = (x, y, z), P
i
= (x
i
, y
i
, z
i
)
and
r(P, P
i
) =
_
(x x
i
)
2
+ (y y
i
)
2
+ (z z
i
)
2
.
It was Laplace who proposed to study the corresponding PDE satised by the po-
tential function u and in this respect denote u
i
=
i
r(P,Pi)
and compute its partial
derivatives. We notice that
x
r =
xxi
r
,
y
r =
yyi
r
=
z
r =
zzi
r
and
x
u
i
=
i
(x x
i
)
r
3
,
y
u
i
=
i
(y y
i
)
r
3
,
z
u
i
=
i
(z z
i
)
r
3
(3.3)
Using (3.3) we see easily that
_
2
x
u
i
=
i
[
1
r
3
+ 3
xxi
2
r
5
]
2
y
u
i
=
i
[
1
r
3
+ 3
yyi
2
r
5
]
2
z
u
i
=
i
[
1
r
3
+ 3
zzi
2
r
5
]
(3.4)
and by adding we obtain
u
i
=
2
x
u
i
+
2
y
u
i
+
2
z
u
i
= 0, i = 1, 2, . . . , N (3.5)
which implies
(u =
N
i=1
u
i
)u =
2
x
u +
2
y
u +
2
z
u = 0 (Laplace Equation) (3.6)
3.2 Poisson Equation
It may occur that we need to consider a body with a mass distributed in a volume
having the density = (a, b, c) at the point x = a, y = b, z = c and vanishing outside
3.2. POISSON EQUATION 95
of the ball a
2
+b
2
+(
2
R
2
. In this case the potential function will be computed as
follows
u(P) =
___
a
2
+b
2
+C
2
R
2
(a, b, c) da db dc
r(P, P(a, b, c))
(3.7)
where P = (x, y, z), P(a, b, c) = (a, b, c) and the constant is included in the function
. By a direct computation we will prove that if (a, b, c), (a, b, c) B(0, R), is rst
order continuously dierentiable then the potential dened in (3.7) satises Poisson
equation.
u =
2
x
u +
2
y
u +
2
z
u = 4(x, y, z), (x, y, z) B(0, R) (3.8)
and
u = 0, (x, y, z) , B(0, R) (Laplace Equation) (3.9)
We recall that a similar law of interaction between electrical particles is valid and
Coulomb law is described by
=
m
1
m
2
r
2
, (m
1
, m
2
) electric charges of (P
1
, P
2
) (3.10)
=
1
a constant,
r
2
= (x
1
x
2
)
2
+ (y
1
y
2
)
2
+ (z
1
z
2
)
2
P
1
= (x
1
, y
1
, z
1
)P
2
= (x
2
, y
2
, z
2
).
The associated electrostatic eld (E
x
, E
y
, E
z
) is dened by
E
x
=
x
u, E
y
=
y
u, E
z
=
z
u
and in this case we get the following Poisson equation
x
E
x
+
y
E
y
+
z
E
z
=
4
(3.11)
when a density is used and the electrical potential function has the corresponding
integral form.
Proof of the equation (3.8) for u dened in (3.7). Rewrite the potential function on
the whole space
u(x, y, z) =
___
(a, b, c)
_
(x a)
2
+ (y b)
2
+ (z c)
2
da db dc (3.12)
and making a translation of coordinates a x = , b y = , c z = , we get
u(x, y, z) =
___
(x +, y +, z +)
_
2
+
2
+
2
d d d (3.13)
where the integral is singular and = = = 0 is the singular point. The integral
in (3.13) is uniformly convergent with respect to the parameters (x, y, z) because the
function under integral has an integrable upper bound

2
+
2
+
2
, where
= max[[.
In this respect, we notice that if (x, y, z) B(0, R) R
3
then B(0, 2R) can be taken
as a domain D where the integration of (3.13) is performed. (see
2
+
2
+
2
(2R)
2
).
Taking a standard coordinates transformation (spherical coordinates)
= r cos sin , = r sinsin , = r cos , 0 2, 0 , 0 r 2R
we rewrite (3.13) on D = B(0, 2R) as follows
___
D
ddd
_
2
+
2
+
2
= 4
_
2R
0
r
2
dr
r
= 4
(2R)
2
2
(3.14)
where
__
D
1
r
ddd = (
_
2R
0
r
2
r
dr(
_

0
sind).2 = 4
_
2R
0
rdr
and
det
_
_
_
_
= r
2
sin( = (r, , )) are used .
In addition by formal derivation of (3.13) with respect to(x, y, z) we get the following
uniformly convergent integrals
x
u =
___

x
[(x +, y + eta, z +)]
_
2
+
2
+
2
ddd
==
___
D
[(x +, y + eta, z +)]

_
2
+
2
+
2
ddd (3.15)
Using (x +, y +, z +) = 0 on the sphere
2
+
2
+
2
= (2R)
2
and
[(x + , y + , z + )]
_
2
+
2
+
2
=
[((x + , y + , z + ))]
_
2
+
2
+
2
+
(x + + , z + )
(
2
+
2
+
2
)
3\2
we get
x
u =
___
d
(x + +, z +)
(
2
+
2
+
2
)
3\2
dd (3.16)
provided
0 =
__
D
[(, , )]ddd =
__
D1
[(
2
,
1
, ) (
1
,
1
, )]dd
is used where
2
= +
_
(2R
2
)
2
2
,
1
=
_
(2R
2
)
2
2
and (
i
, , ) = 0 i 1, 2. The integral (3.16)is uniformly convergent with respect
to(x, y, z) D(0, R) and noticing

2
+
2
=
2
1, we get the following integrable
3.2. POISSON EQUATION 97
upper bound
[
x
u[
___
D
ddd
_
2
+
2
+
2
= 4
_
2R
0
r
2
dr
r
2
= 4
2
(2R) (3.17)
which proves that (3.16) is valid. Similar arguments are used to show that
y
u and
z
u exist fullling
_
y
u =
__
D
(x+1y+1z+)
(
2
+
2
+
2
)
3\2
ddd
z
u =
__
D
(x+1y+1z+)
(
2
+
2
+
2
)
3\2
ddd
(3.18)
Applying
x
to (
x
u) in (3.16),
y
to
y
u and
z
to (
z
u) in (3.18) we get convergent
integrals
_
2
x
u =
___
D
(
2
+
2
+
2
)
3\2
[(x, , y, , z +)]ddd
2
y
u =
___
D
(
2
+
2
+
2
)
3\2
[(x, , y, , z +)]ddd
2
z
u =
___
D
(
2
+
2
+
2
)
3\2
[(x, , y, , z +)]ddd
(3.19)
where
s
[(x + , y + , z + )](s , , ) is a continuous and bounded function
on D(see is rst order continuously dierentiable on D) using (3.19) we get the
expression of the laplacian
_
_
u =
2
x
u +
2
y
u +
2
z
u
=
___
D
++[(x+,y+,z+)]
(
2
+
2
+
2
) 3 2
ddd
=
_
2R
0

__
Sr
r[(x+,y+,z+)]
r
2
dS
r
dr
(3.20)
where S
r
is a sphere with radius
r = (
2
+
2
+
2
)
1
2
and
r
=< (
), (
r
,

r
,

r
) >
Here each (, , ) S
r
can be represented as
(, , ) = (r
0
, r
0
, r
0
)
where
(
0
,
0
,
0
) S
1
and using d S
r
= r
2
d S
1
we rewrite (3.20) as follows
u
_
_
=
_
2R
0

__
S1
r
[(x +
0
r, y +
0
r, z +
0
r)]drdS
1
=
__
S1
[(x + 2R
0
, y + 2R
0
, z + 2R
0
) (x, y, z)]dS
1
__
S1
(x, y, z)dS
1
= 4(x, y, z)
(3.21)
It shows that the equality (3.8) (Poisson equation) is for any (x, y, z) B(0, R) where
R > 0 was arbitrarily xed and the proof is complete.
We conclude this introduction by showing that the potential function u(x, y, z) dened
in (3.7) satised the following asymptotic behaviour
lim
r
u(x, y, z) = 0, or lim
r
_
x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
u(x, y, z) =
__ _
D
(a, b, c)da db dc (3.22)
In this respect ,denote Q = (x, y, z) , P = (a, b, c), dv = da db dc and rewrite equation
(3.22) as follows
u(Q) =
___
D
(P)dv
r(P, Q)
(D : r(P, Q) R)
lim
r(0,Q)
r(0, Q)u(Q) = lim
r(0,Q)
___
D
(P)dv
[1
r(0,Q)r(P,Q)
r(0,Q)
]
=
___
D
(P)dv (3.23)
Here we notice that a =
r(0,Q)r(P,Q)
r(0,Q)
satises [ a [< 1 ,
1
(
1 a) = 1 + a + a
2
+, . . .
and [ r(0, Q) r(P, Q) [ r(0, P) leads us to (3.23) and (3.22) are valid. We conclude
the above given considerations by
Theorem 3.2.1. Let (x, y, z) : R
3
R be a continuously dierentiable function
in a open neighborhood V (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) R
3
and vanishing outside of the xed ball
B(0, L) R
3
. Then
u(x, y, z) =
___
a
2
+b
2
+C
2
L
2
(a, b, c)da db dc
r(P, P(a, b, c))
, P = (x, y, z) R
3
satises the following Poisson equations
u(x, y, z) = (
2
x
+
2
y
+
2
z
)u(x, y, z) = 4(x, y, z) (3.24)
for any (x, y, z) V (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
), u(x, y, z) = 0 (x, y, z) not in B(0, L). In addition
lim
r
u(x, y, z) = 0 (or lim
r
ru(x, y, z)) =
___
B(0,L)
(a, b, c)da db dc (3.25)
Remark 3.2.2. The result in Theorem 3.2.1 holds true when replacing R
3
with
R
n
(n 3) and if it is the case then the corresponding newtonian potential function
3.3. EXERCISES 99
is given by
u(x) =
_
. . .
_
ntimes
(y)dy
1
. . . dy
n
r
n2
where (y) : R
n
R is a continuously dierentiable function vanishing outside of the
ball B(0, L) R
n
and r =[ x y [= (
n
i=1
(x
i
y
i
)
2
)
1
2
. The corresponding Poisson
equation is given by
n
i=1
2
i
u(x) = u(x) = (x)(
1
) x R
n
, where
1
= measS(0, 1)
3.3 Exercises
Using the same algorithm as in Theorem 3.2.1 prove that the corresponding potential
function(logarithm)in R
2
is given by
u(x, y) =
__
(a, b)ln
1
((x a)
2
+ (y b)
2
)
1
2
da db
and satises the following Poisson equation
u(x, y) = (
2
x
+
2
y
)u(x, y) = 2(x, y), (x, y) V (x
0
, y
0
)
Here : R
2
R is rst order continuously dierentiable in the open neighborhood
V (x
0
, y
0
) R
2
and vanishes out side of the disk B(0, L) R
2
. By a direct computa-
tion show that the following Lapace equation
u(x) =
n
i=1
2
i
u(x) = 0 x R
n
, (n 3), x ,= 0
is valid, where
u(x) =
1
r
n2
, r = (
n
i=1
x
2
i
)
1
2
, x = (x
1
, ...x
n
)
2
i
u(x) =

2
u(x)
x
2
i
3.4 Maximum Principle for Harmonic Functions
Any solution of the Lapace equation u(x, y, z) = 0 will be called harmonic function
Maximum principle
A harmonic function u(x, y, z) which is continuous in a bounded closed domain G =
G and admitting second order continuous partial derivatives in the open set G R
3
satisfy
max
(x,y,z)G
u(x, y, z) = max
(x,y,z)
u(x, y, z) and min
(x,y,z)G
u(x, y, z) = min
(x,y,z)
u(x, y, z)
where = G ( boundary of G )
Proof. Denote m = maxu(x, y, z) : (x, y, z) and assume that maxu(x, y, z) :
(x, y, z) G = M = u(x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) > m, where (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) G. Dene the auxiliary
function
(x, y, z) = u(x, y, z) +
M m
2d
2
[(x x
0
)
2
+ (y y
0
)
2
+ (z z
0
)
2
]
and
d = maxr(P, Q) : P, Q G and r(P, Q) =[ P Q [
(distance between two points). By denition,
r
2
(P, P
0
) = (x x
0
)
2
+ (y y
0
)
2
+ (z z
0
)
2
, (P = (x, y, z), P
0
= (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
))
and using r
2
(P, P
0
) d
2
we get
(x, y, z) m+
M m
2
=
M +m
2
, (x, y, z)
On the other hand, (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) = u(x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) = M and it implies max(x, y, z) :
(x, y, z) G = V (P) is achieved in the open set P G. As a consequence
x
(x, y, z) = 0,
y
(x, y, z) = 0,
z
(x, y, z),
2
x
(x, y, z) 0
2
y
(x, y, z) 0 and
2
z
(x, y, z) 0
where P = (x, y, z). In addition
(P) 0 and (P) = u(P) +
M m
2d
2
[r
2
(P, P0)]
P=P
=
M m
2d
2
(2 + 2 + 2) > 0
which is a contradiction. Therefore
u(x, y, z) m = maxu(x, y, z) : (x, y, z) , (x, y, z) G
To prove the inequality
u(x, y, z) minu(x, y, z) : (x, y, z) , (x, y, z) G
we apply the above given result to u(x, y, z). The proof is complete.
Remark 3.4.1. With the same proof we get that a harmonic function in the plane
2
x
u(x, y) +
2
y
u(x, y) = 0(x, y) D R
2
3.4. MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE FOR HARMONIC FUNCTIONS 101
which is continuous on
D = DUD satisfy
maxu(x, y) : (x, y) D = maxu(x, y) : (x, y) D
minu(x, y) : (x, y) D = minu(x, y) : (x, y) D
Remark 3.4.2. The Poisson equation
u(x, y, z) = 4(x, y, z) (3.26)
has a unique solution under the restriction.
lim
r
u(x, y, z) = 0 where (x, y, z) : R
3
R
is a continuous function. Consider that u
1
, u
2
are solutions of the Poisson equation
(3.26) fullling
lim
r
u
i
(x, y, z) = 0, i 1, 2
Then u = u
1
u
2
satises u(x, y, z) = 0 for any (x, y, z) R
3
and lim
r
u(x, y, z) =
0. In particular, u(x, y, z) : (x, y, z) B(0, R) R
3
satises, maximum principle,
where B(0, R) = G and = (x, y, z) R
3
: x
2
+y
2
+z
2
= R
2
. We get u(x
0
, y
0
, z
0
)
maxu(x, y, z) : (x, y, z) and u(x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) minu(x, y, z) : (x, y, z) for any
(x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) int B(0, R). In particular, for (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) int B(0, R) xed and passing
R we get u(x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) = 0 and u
1
(x, y, z) = u
2
(x, y, z) for any (x, y, z) R
3
.
3.4.1 The Wave Equation; Kirchho, DAlembert and
Poisson Formulas
Consider the waves equation
2
t
u(t, x, y, z) = C
2
0
(
2
x
u +
2
y
u +
2
z
u)(t, x, y, z) (3.27)
for (x, y, z) D(domain) R
3
and initial condition
u(0, x, y, z) = u
0
(0, x, y, z),
t
u(0, x, y, z) = u
1
(x, y, z) (3.28)
The integral representation of the solution satisfying (3.27) and (3.28)is called Kirch-
ho formula. In particular, for 1- dimensional case the equation and initial conditions
are described by
2
t
u(t, x) = C
2
0
2
x
u(t, x), u(0, x) = u
0
(x),
t
u(0, x) = u
1
(x) (3.29)
and dAlembert formula gives the following representation
u(t, x) =
u
0
(x +c
0
t) +u
0
(x c
0
t)
2
+
1
2c
0
_
c0t+x
xc0t
u
1
()d (3.30)
In this simplest case, the equation (3.29)is decomposed as follows
(
t
+c
0
x
)(
t
c
0
x
)u(t, x) = 0 (3.31)
and nd the general solution of the linear rst order equation
t
(t, x) +c
0
x
(t, x) = 0 (3.32)
By a direct computation we get
(t, x) =
0
(x c
0
t), (t, x) R R (3.33)
where
0
() : R R is an arbitrary rst order continuously dierentiable function.
Then solve the following equation
_

t
u(t, x) c
0
x
u(t, x) =
0
(x c
0
t)
u(0, x) = u
0
(x),
t
u(0, x) = u
1
(x)
(3.34)
From the equation u(0, x) = u
0
(x),
t
u(0, x) = u
1
(x) we nd
0
such that
u
1
(x) c
0
x
u
0
(x) =
0
(x), x R (3.35)
and using the characteristic system associated with (3.34) we obtain
u(t, x) = u
0
(x +c
0
t) +
t
_
0
0
(x +c
0
t 2c
0
s)ds (3.36)
Using (3.35) into (3.34) we get the corresponding DAlembert formula
u(t, x) =
u
0
(x +x
0
t) +u
0
(x c
0
t)
2
+
1
2c
0
x+c0t
_
xc0t
u
1
()d (3.37)
given in (3.30) In the two-dimensional case (x, y) R
2
we recall that the Poisson
formula is expressed as follows
u(t, x, y) =
1
2c
0
[
t
(
2
_
0
c0t
_
0
u
0
(x +cos, y +sin)
_
c
2
0
t
2
2
dd)
+ (
2
_
0
c0t
_
0
u
1
(x +cos, y +sin)
_
c
2
0
t
2
2
dd)] (3.38)
The general case ,(x, y, z) R
3
, will be treated reducing the equation (3.27) to an
wave equation analyzed in the one-dimensional case provided adequate coordinate
transformations are used. In this respect, for a P
0
= (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
) D xed and
B(P
0
, r) D we dene (u is the mean value of u on S
r
)
u(r, t) =
1
4r
2
__
Sr
u(t, x, y, z)dS
r
=
1
4
__
S1
u(t, x, y, z)dS
1
(3.39)
where S
r
= B(P
0
, r) is the boundary of the ball B(P
0
, r), and dS
r
= r
2
dS
1
is
used.The integral in (3.39) can be computed as a two dimensional integral provided
we notice that each (x, y, z) S
r
can be written as
(x, y, z) = (x
0
+r, y
0
+r, z
0
+r) = P
0
+rw (3.40)
where (, , ) = are the following
_
_
_
= sincos 0
= sinsin 0
= cos
(3.41)
Here dS
r
= r
2
sindd and rewrite (3.39) using a two dimensional integral
u(r, t) =
1
4
2
_
0
_
0
u(t, P
0
+rw)sindd (3.42)
assuming w = (, , ) given in (3.42).The explicit expression of u(r, t) in (14) will
be deduced taking into consideration the corresponding wave equation satised by
u(r, t) when u(t, x, y, z) is a solution of (3.27). In this respect, integrate in both sides
of (3.27) using the three dimensional domain D
r
= B(P
0
, r), P
0
= (x
0
, y
0
, z
0
), and
the spherical transformation of the coordinates (x, y, z)
(x, y, z) = (x
0
+, y
0
+ +z
0
+) = P
0
+ (3.43)
where 0 r and (, ), (, ), () satisfy (3.41). We get
___
Dr
2
t
u(t, x, y, z)dxdydz =
r
_
0
(
__
S1
2
t
u(t, P
0
+)
2
dS
1
)d (3.44)
where dS
1
= sinddand S
1
= S(P
0
, 1) is the sphere centered at P
0
. Denote =
2
x
+
2
y
+
2
z
and for the integral in the right hand side we apply Gauss-Ostrogradsky
formula. We get
C
2
0
___
Dr
u(t, x, y, z)dxdydz = C
2
0
__
Sr
[
x
u(t, P
0
+r)
+
y
u(t, P
0
+r) +
z
u(t, P
0
+r)]dS
r
= C
2
0
__
S1
r
[u(t, P
0
+r)]r
2
dS
1
= C
2
0
r
2
r
[
__
S1
u(t, P
0
+r)dS
1
] (3.45)
where (, , ) = are the coordinates of the unit outside normal vector at S
r
. Using
(3.39) we rewrite (3.45) as
C
2
0
___
Dr
u(t, x, y, z)dxdydz = C
2
0
r
2
(4)
r
u(r, t) (3.46)
In addition, notice that (3.44) can be written as
___
Dr
2
t
u(t, P
0
+)dxdydz =
_
r
0
2
[
2
t
___
S1
u(t, P
0
+)dS
1
]d
=
_
r
0
4
2
2
t
u(, t)d (3.47)
and deriving with respect to r in (3.46)and (3.47) we obtain
2
t
u(r, t) =
C
2
0
r
2

r
[r
2
r
u(r, t)] (3.48)
Denote u(r, t) = ru(r, t) and using (3.48) compute
2
t
u(r, t)
_
_
= r
2
t
u(r, t)
=
C
2
0
r
2

r
[r
2
r
u(r, t)]
=
C
2
0
r
2
[2r
r
u(r, t) +r
2
2
r
u(r, t)]
= C
2
0
[2
r
u(r, t) +r
2
r
u(r, t)]
(3.49)
Notice that
2
r
u(r, t) = 2
r
u(r, t) +r
2
r
u(r, t) (3.50)
and rewrite (3.49) as follows
2
t
u(r, t) = C
2
0
2
r
u(r, t), r 0 (3.51)
where u satises the boundary condition
u(0, t) = 0 (3.52)
Extend u(r, t) for r < 0 by u(r, t) = u(r, t) where r 0. In addition, the initial
conditions for u(r, t) are the following
_
_
_
u(r, 0) = ru(r, 0) =
1
4r
__
Sr
u
0
(x, y, z)dS
r
t
u(r, 0) =
1
4r
__
Sr
u
1
(x, y, z)dS
r
(3.53)
The solution u(r, t) fullling (3.51))and (3.53) are expressed using Poisson formula
(see(3.30))
u(r, t) =
(r +C
0
t) +(r C
0
t)
2
+
1
2C
0
_
x+C0
xC0
()d (3.54)
where
() = u(, 0) =
1
4
__
S
u
1
(x, y, z)dS
(3.55)
and
() =
t
u(, 0) =
1
4
__
S
u
0
(x, y, z)dS
(3.56)
Using (3.55) and (3.56) we get the Kirchho formula for the solution of the wave
equation (3.27) satisfying Cauchy conditions (3.28) and it can be expressed as follows
u(t, P
0
) =
d
dr
[
1
4r
__
Sr(P0)
u
0
(x, y, z)dS
r
]
r=C0t
+ [
1
4C
0
__
Sr(P0)
u
1
(x, y, z)dS
r
]
r=C0t
=
1
4C
0
[
d
dr
(
1
C
0
t
__
Sc
0
t(P0)
u
0
(x, y, z)dS) +
1
C
0
t
__
Sc
0
t(P0)
u
1
(x, y, z)dS] (3.57)
where
__
Sc
0
t(P0)
u
0
(x, y, z)dS =
_
2
0
_

0
u(P
0
+ (C
0
t))(C
0
t)
2
sindd
and = (, , ) is dened in (3.41). Passing P
0
P = (x, y, z) in the Kirchho for-
mula (3.57) we get the integral representation of a Cauchy problem solution satisfying
(3.27) and (3.28)
u(t, x, y, z) =
1
4C
0
[
d
dt
(
1
C
0
t
__
Sc
0
t(P0)
u
0
(x, y, z)dS) +
1
C
0
t
__
Sc
0
t(P0)
u
1
(x, y, z)dS] (3.58)
where the integral in (3.58) is computed as follows
1
C0t
__
Sc
0
t(P
0
)
u(, , )dS = C0t
_
2
0
_

0
u(x+(C0t), y+(C0t), z+(C0t))sindd (3.59)
and (, , ) are dened in (3.41)
_
_
_
= sincos 0
= sinsin 0 2
= cos
Proposition 3.4.3. Assume that u
0
, u
1
(
4
(R
3
) are given. Then u(t, x, y, z) : t
R
+
, (x, y, z) R
3
dened in (3.58) is a solution of the hyperbolic equation (3.27)
satisfying the Cauchy condition (3.28).
Proof. Notice that if u(t, x, y, z) satises the wave equation (3.27) then (t, x, y, z) =
t
u(t, x, y, z) veries also the wave equation (3.27). It allows us to get the conclusion
and it is enough to prove that
u(t, x, y, z) = C
0
t
_
2
0
_

0
u(x + (C
0
t), y + (C
0
t), z + (C
0
t))sindd (3.60)
fulls the wave equation (3.27).In this respect, using (3.60), compute the correspond-
ing derivatives involved in equation (3.27) and we get
t
u =
u
t
+ (C
0
t)
t
_
2
0
_

0
u(x + (C
0
t), y + (C
0
t), z + (C
0
t))sindd
=
u
t
+
1
t
_
2
0
_

0
(
u) + (
u) + (
)C
2
0
t
2
sindd (3.61)
Notice that (, , ) = nrepresent the unit vector oriented outside of the sphere
S
C0
and dS = (C
0
t)
2
sin d d we rewrite (3.61)
t
u =
u
t
+
I
t
(3.62)
where
I =
_
2
0
_

0
(
u) + (
u) + (
)C
2
0
t
2
sindd
=
__
SC
0
t
u
n
dS
=
___
B(x,y,z;C0t)
(
2
u +
2
u +
2
u)ddd (3.63)
is written using Gauss-Ostrogrodsky formula,and B(x, y, z; C
0
t) is the ball in R
3
3.5. EXERCISES 107
centered at P = (x, y, z). From (3.62), deriving again we get
2
t
=
1
t
t
u
1
t
2
u +
1
t
t
I
1
t
2
I =
1
t
(
u
t
+
I
t
)
u
t
2

I
t
2
+
1
t
t
I =
1
t
t
I (3.64)
On the other hand,using (3.63) and applying the spherical coordinate transformation
in the three-dimensional integral we get
_
_
_
I =
_
C0t
0
[
_
2
0
_
0
(
2
u +
2
u +
2
u)sindd]r
2
dr
t
I = C
0
__
SC
0
t
(x, y, z)(
2
u +
2
u +
2
u)ds
(3.65)
and (3.64) becomes
2
t
u =
C
0
t
__
SC
)
t(x,y,z)
(u)(, , )dS (3.66)
Denote u(t, x, y, z) = (
2
x
u +
2
y
u +
2
z
u)(t, x, y, z) and a direct computation applied
in (3.60) allows to get
u(t, x, y, z) =
1
(C
0
)
2
.
C
0
t
__
SC
)
t(x,y,z)
(u)(, , )dS (3.67)
and each term entering in the denition (3.58) will satisfy the wave equation (3.27).
In addition, using (3.59), we see easily that the Cauchy condition given in (3.28) are
satised by the function u(t, x, y, z) dened in (3.58). The proof is complete.
3.5 Exercises
(a
1
) consider the wave equation in plane
2
t
u(t, x, y) = c
2
0
[
2
x
u(t, x, y) +
2
y
u(t, x, y)], u(0, x, y) = y
0
(x, y),
t
u(0, x, y) = u
1
(x, y)
Find the integral representation of its solution. (Poisson formula see (3.68)).
Hint. It will be deduced from the Kirchho formula (see proposition 1) considering
that the variable z does not appear. We get
u(t, x, y) =
1
2C
0
_
t
_
_
2
0
_
C0t
0
_
c
2
0
t
2
2
u
0
(x + cos, y +sin))dd
_
+
_
2
0
_
C0t
0
_
c
2
0
t
2
2
u
1
(x +cos, y +sin)dd] (3.68)
In the Kirchho formula (see(3.58)) the function u(, ) does not depend on and a
direct computation gives the following
( [0, ], [0, 2])
E =
_
2
0
_

0
u(x + (C
0
t)sincos, y + (C
0
t)sinsin)(C
2
0
t
2
)sindd
=
_
2
0
_
2
0
u()(C
2
0
t
2
)sindd +
_
2
0
_

2
u()C
2
0
t
2
sindd
= 2
_
2
0
_
2
0
u(x, cotsincos, y + (cot)sinsin)(C
2
0
t
2
)sindd
Change the coordinate = (C
0
t)sin and get d = (C
0
t)cosd for 0

2
where
cos =
_
1 sin
2
=
1

2
C
0
t
2
=
1
C
0
t
_
(C
0
t)
2
2
We get
E = 2
_
2
0
_
C0t
0
_
c
2
0
t
2
2
u(x +cos, y +sin)dd
and Kirchhos formula becomes Poison formula given in (3.68).
(a
2
) Prove that the solution of the non homogeneous waves equation.
_

2
t
u C
2
0
(
2
x
u +
2
y
y +
2
z
u) = f(x, y, z, t)
u(0, x, y, z) = 0
t
u(0, x, y, z) = 0
(3.69)
is presented by the following formula.
u(t, x, y, z) =
1
4C
2
0
___
B(x,y,z;C0t)
f(, , , t
(x)
2
+(y)
2
+(z)
2
C0
)
_
(x )
2
+ (y )
2
+ (z )
2
ddd (3.70)
solution.
Denote p = (x, y, z), q = (, , ) and[ p q [= [
3
i=1
(p
i
q
i
)
2
]
1
2
; B(p, C
0
t) is the ball
centered at p with radius C
0
t. To get(3.70) as a solution of (3.69) we use the solution
of the following homogeneous equation
2
t
= c
2
0
, [
t=
=
0
(p),
t
[
t=
= f(p, ) =
1
(p) (3.71)
where the initial moment t = (replacing t = 0) is a parameter.Recall the Kirchho
formula for the solution satisfying (3.71)
(t, p) =
1
4C
0
[
d
dt
(
__
Sr(P)
0
(q)
r
dS
r
) +
__
Sr(P)
1
(q)
r
dS
r
] (3.72)
3.5. EXERCISES 109
where r = C
0
t and dS
r
= r
2
dS
1
= r
2
sinddfor [0, 2], where S
1
is the unit
sphere. Making use of the spherical coordinates transformation
q = p +r, = (sincos, sinsin, cos), r = C
0
t (3.73)
we rewrite (3.72) as follows
(t, p) =
1
4
t
[t
__
S1(P)
0
(p + r)dS
1
] +
t
4
__
S1(P)
1
(p +r)dS
1
(3.74)
where dS
1
= sin d d. Using the Cauchy conditions of (3.71) from (3.74) we get
(t, p; ) =
t
4
__
S1(P)
f(p +C
0
(t ); )dS
1
, 0 t (3.75)
where t representing t and [
t=
= 0 are used. We shall show that u(t, p) dened
by (Duhamel integral)
u(t, p) =
_
t
0
(t, p; ) d (3.76)
is a solution of the wave equation (3.69). The initial conditions u(0, p) = 0 =
t
u(0, p) are easily veried by direct inspection. Computing lapacian operator
p
=
2
x
+
2
y
+
2
z
applied in both sides of (3.76) we obtain
p
u(t, p) =
_
t
0
p
(t, p; ) d (3.77)
Notice that
t
applied in (3.76) lead us to
_
t
u(t, p) = (t, p; )
=t
+
_
t
0

t
(t, p; ) d
2
t
u(t, p) =
t
(t, p; )
=t
+
_
t
0

2
t
(t, p; ) d =
= f(p, t) +C
0
_
t
0

p
(t, p; )d
= f(p, t) +C
2
0
p
u(t, p)
(3.78)
and u(t, p) dened in (3.76) veries the wave equation (3.69). Using (3.75) we
rewrite (3.76) as in conclusion (3.70). In this respect, substituting (3.75) into (3.76)
we get following formula (dS
1
= sin d d)
u(t, p; ) =
1
4
_
t
0
(t )[
__
S1(P)
f(p +C
0
(t ); )dS
1
]d (3.79)
Making a change of variables C
0
(t ) = r, we get
u(t, p) =
1
4C
2
0
_
C0t
0
_
2
0
_

0
f(p +r, t
r
C
0
)r sin d ddr (3.80)
and noticing that r =
r
2
r
, [ [
2
= 1 we rewrite (3.80) as follows
u(t, p) =
1
4C
2
0
__ _
B(p,C0t)
f(q, t
[ p q [
C
0
)
1
[ p q [
dq (3.81)
3.5.1 System of Hyperbolic and Elliptic Equations(Denition)
Denition 3.5.1. A rst order system of n equations
A
0
t
u +
m
i=1
A
i
(x, t)
i
u = f(x, y, u), u R
n
, R
m
(3.82)
is t-hyperbolic if the corresponding characteristic equation det [[ A
0
(x, t) +
m
i=1
A
i
(x, t) [[= o has n real distinct roots for the variable at each point (t, x)
[0, T] D, D R
m
, for any R
m
, ,= 0. There is a particular rst order system
for which a verication of this property is simple
Denition 3.5.2. The rst order system (3.82) is symmetric t- hyperbolic (dened by
Friedreich)if all matrices A
j
(x, t)j 0, 1, ..., m are symmetric and A
0
(x, t) is strictly
positive denite in the domain (t, x) [0, T] D
Denition 3.5.3. The rst order system (3.82) is called elliptic if the corresponding
characteristic equation det | A
0
(x, t) +
m
i=1
A
i
|= 0 has no real solution (, )
R
m+1
, (, ) ,= 0, (x, t) D [0, T].
Example 3.5.1. In the case of a second order PDE
a(x, t)
2
t
u + 2b(x, t)
2
(t,x)
u + c(x, t)
2
x
u + d(x, t)tu + e(x, t)xu = f(x, t, u), x R (3.83)
We get the following characteristic equation
a(x, t)
2
+ 2b(t, x) +c(t, x)
2
= 0 (3.84)
Hint Using a standard procedure we rewrite the scalar equation (3.83) as an evolution
system for the unknown vector u
1
(t, x) =
x
u(t, x), u
2
(t, x) =
t
u(t, x), u
3
(t, x) =
u(t, x). We get
_
_
_
t
u
1
=
x
u
2
a(x, t)
t
u
2
= 2b(x, t)
x
u
2
c(x, t)
x
u
1
+f
1
(x, t, u
1
, u
2
, u
3
)
t
u
3
= u
2
, t R, x R
(3.85)
wheref
1
(x, t, u
1
, u
2
, u
3
) = f(x, t, u
3
) e(x, t)u
1
d(x, t)u
2
. The system (3.85) can be
written as (3.82) using the following (3 3) matrices
3.6. ADJOINT 2ND ORDER OPERATOR;GREEN FORMULAS 111
A
0
(x, t) =
_
_
1 0 0
0 a(x, t) 0
0 0 1
_
_
, A
0
(x, t) =
_
_
0 1 0
c(x, t) 2b(x, t) 0
0 0 0
_
_
Compute
det | A
0
(x, t) +A
1
(x, t) | = det
_
_
0
.c a + 2b 0
0 0
_
_
= [a(x, t)
2
+ 2b(x, t) + c(x, t)
2
]
and the characteristic equation (3.84) is obtained.
3.6 Adjoint Second Order Dierential Operator; Rie-
mann and Green Formulas
We consider the following linear second order dierential operator
L =
n
i=1
n
j=1
A
ij
2
ij
+
n
i=1
B
i
i
+C (3.86)
where the coecients A
ij
, B
i
, and C are second order continuously dierentiable
scalar functions of the variable x = (x
1
, ..., x
n
) R
n
and
i
=
d
dxi
,
2
ij
=

2
xixj
.
Without restricting generality we may assume that A
ij
= A
ij
(seeA
ij

1
2
(A
ij
+A
ij
))
and dene the adjoint operator associated with L(L
= M)
M
n
i=1
n
j=1
2
ij
(A
ij
)
i=1
i
(B
i
) +C (3.87)
By a direct computation we convince ourselves that the following formula is valid
L
u
uM =
n
i=1
i
P
i
, u, (
2
(R
n
) (3.88)
where
P
i
=
n
j=i
[A
ij
j
u u
j
(A
ij
)] +B
i
u
In this respect notice that
n
i=1
i
P
i
=
_
n
i=1
n
j=1
A
ij
2
ij
u +
n
i=1
B
i
i
u +Cu
_
_
n
i=1
n
j=1
u
2
ij
(A
ij
)
n
i=1
u
i
(B
i
) +Cu
_
+
n
i=1
n
j=1
[
j
u
i
(A
ij
)
i
u
j
(A
ij
)]
where the last term is vanishing.
3.6.1 Green Formula and Applications
Consider a bounded domain R
n
and assume that its boundary S = can be
expressed using piecewise rst order continuously dierentiable functions. Then using
Gauss-Ostrogradsky formula associated with (3.88) we get
_
(Lu uM)dx
1
, ...dx
n
= +
_
S
(
n
i=1
P
i
cosnx
i
)dS (3.89)
(Green formula) where cos nx
i
, i 1, ..., n, are the coordinates of the unit orthog-
onal vector
n at S oriented outside of S.
Example 3.6.1. Assume Lu = u =
3
i=1
2
i
u(laplacian) associate the adjoint M =
(laplacian) and P
1
=
i
uu
1
, P
2
=
2
uu
2
, P
3
=
3
uu
3
u satisfying
(3.88). Applying (3.89) we get the Green formula for Laplace operator.
___
(u u)dx
1
dx
2
dx
3
=
__
S
[P
1
(cosnx
1
) +P
2
(cosnx
2
) +P(cosnx
3
)]dS
=
__
S
[
u
n
u
u
n
]dS (3.90)
Where
u
n
(
n
) stands for the derivative in direction of the vector
n
u
n
=
3
i=1
(
i
u)cosnx
i
=<
x
u,

n > n = (cosnx
1
, (cosnx
2
, (cosnx
3
))
Example 3.6.2. Consider
L
2
xy
u +a(x, y)
x
u +b(x, y)
y
u +c(x, y)u
and dene
M
2
xy

x
(a)
y
(b) +c, P
1
=
1
2
(
y
u u
y
) +a u
and
P
1
=
1
2
(
x
u u
x
) +b u
The corresponding Green formula lead us to
__
[ Lu u M, ]dxdy =
_
S
[
1
2
(
y
u u
y
) (3.91)
= a u ]cos(n, x) + [
1
2
(
x
u u
x
) +a u ]cos(n, y)ds
3.6.2 Applications of Riemann Function
Using (3.91) we will nd the Cauchy problem solution associated with the equation
Lu = F (3.92)
and the initial conditions
u[
y=(x)
=
0
(x),
y
u[y = (x) =
1
(x), x [a, b] (3.93)
Here the curve y = y(x) is rst order continuously dierentiable satisfying
d(x)
dx
<
0 , x [a, b]. The algorithm belongs to Riemann and using (3.93) we nd
x
u[
y=(x)
as follows. By direct derivation of u[
y=(x)
=
0
(x), we get
_
d0
dx
(x) =
x
u(x, (x)) +
y
u(x, (x))
d(x)
dx
x
u(x, (x)) =
0
(x)
1
(x)
(x)
(3.94)
Rewrite the Green formula (3.91) using a domain R
2
as follows. where A and B
are located on the curve y = (x) intersected with the coordinates lines of the xed
point P = (x
0
, y
0
). Applying the corresponding Green formula (3.91) on the domain
PAB (triangle) we get
__
(Lu uM)dxdy =
_
B
A
[
1
2
(
y
u u
y
) +a u ]dy
_
B
A
[
1
2
(
x
u u
x
) +b u ]dx
+
_
P
B
[
1
2
(
y
u u
y
) +a u ]dy
+
_
P
A
[
1
2
(
x
u u
x
) +a u ]dx (3.95)
Where dy = cos(n, x)dS and dx = cos(n, y)dS and considering that dS is a
positive measure. Rewrite the last two integrals from (3.95)
_
P
B
[
1
2
(
y
u u
y
) +a u ]dy =
1
2
u[
P
B
+
_
P
B
(u
y
) +a u ]dy
=
1
2
u[
P
B
+
_
P
B
u(
y
) +a ]dy (3.96)
and
_
P
A
[
1
2
(
x
u u
x
) +a u ]dx =
1
2
u[
P
A
+
_
P
A
u(
x
) +b ]dx (3.97)
these formulas lead us to the solution provided the following Riemann function (x, y; x
0
, y
0
)
is used
M = 0, [
x=x0
= exp
_
y
y0
a(x
0
, )d, [
y=y0
= exp
_
x
x0
b(, y
0
)d (3.98)
From (3.98) we see easily that
_
(x
0
, y
0
; x
0
, y
0
) = 1 and
y
[
x=x0
= a(x
0
, y)[
x=x0
,
x
[
y=y0
= b(x, y
0
)[
y=y0
(3.99)
Using (3.98) and (3.99) into (3.95) we get
__
(x, y; x
0
, y
0
)F(x, y)dxdy = (u)(P) + +I = u(x
0
, y
0
) + +I (3.100)
where
= +
_
B
A
[
1
2
(
y
u u
y
) +a u ]dy
_
B
A
[
1
2
(
x
u u
x
) +b u ]dx (3.101)
and
I =
1
2
[(u)(B) +(u)(A)] +
_
P
B
u(
y
) +a ]dy +
_
P
A
u(
x
) +b ]dx (3.102)
Notice that the integral in (3.102) are vanishing provided that the initial conditions
(3.99) are used for Riemann function (see(3.98) and (3.99)) and the equation (3.100)
is written as
u(x
0
, y
0
) =
1
2
(u)(B) + (u)(A) +
__
F(x, y)dxdy (3.103)

where is dened in (3.101). The Cauchy problem solution dened in (3.92) and
(3.93) has a more explicit expression if the Cauchy conditions are vanishing and it
can be achieved by modifying the right hand side F as follows
F
1
(x, y) = F(x, y)
1
(x) a(x, y)
0
(x) + [y (x)]
1
(x)
(x)
1
(x)
= b(x, y)
1
(x) c(x, y)
0
(x) + (y (x))
1
(x) (3.104)
Theorem 3.6.1. The Cauchy problem solution dened in (3.92) and (3.93) is given
by
u(x
0
, y
0
) =
__
(x, y; x
0
, y
0
)F
1
(x, y)dxdy
where is the corresponding Riemann function dened in (3.98) and (3.99) and F
1
is (3.104).
Remark 3.6.2. In the case we consider a rectangle PASB = and look for a Cauchy
problem solution
Lu = F (where L and F are dened in (3.92)) (3.105)
u[
x=x1
=
1
(y), u[
y=y1
=
2
(x), S = (x
1
, y
1
) (3.106)
then Green formula lead as to the following solution
u(x
0
, y
0
) = u[
p
= u[
S
+
_
B
B
(
2
+b
2
)dx +
_
A
S
(
1
+a
1
)dy +
__
F(x, y)dxdy
(3.107)
where (x, y; x
0
, y
0
) is associated Riemann function satisfying (3.98) and (3.99). Let
u(x, y; x
1
, y
1
) be the Riemann function for the adjoint equation M = 0 satisfying
Lu = 0, u[
y=y1
= exp
x
_
x1
b(
1
, y
1
)d, u[x = x
1
= exp
y
_
y1
a(x
1
, )d (3.108)
In this particular case , the corresponding solution u verify (3.105) and (3.106) with
F = 0,
2
+by
2
=
1
a
1
= 0, and the representation formula (3.107) becomes
u(x
0
, y
0
, x
1
, y
1
) = (x
1
, y
1
, x
0
, y
0
)(see u(S) = u(x
1
, y
1
; x
1
, y
1
) = 1) (3.109)
The equation (3.109) tell us that the Riemann function is symmetric: if u(x
0
, y
0
, y
1
;
x
1
, y
1
) is the Riemann function for(x
0
, y
0
) R
2
satisfying (Lu)(x
0
, y
0
) = 0 and initial
condition given at x = x
1
, y = y
1
then u(x
0
, y
0
; x
1
, y
1
) as a function of ((x
1
, y
1
)
veries the adjoint equation Mv = 0.
Remark 3.6.3. The equation (3.104) reects the continuous dependence of a solution
for the Cauchy problem dened in (3.92) and (3.93) with respect to the right hand
side F and initial conditions
0
,
1
restricted to the triangle PAB. A solution is
determined inside of this triangle using the xed F,
0
,
1
and the curve y = (x)
and outside of this triangle. We may get dierent solutions according to the modied
initial conditions prescribed outside of this triangle.
Remark 3.6.4. A unique solution (Riemann function) verifying the Cauchy problem
dened in (3.108) can be obtained directly using the standard method of approximation
for a system of integral equations associated with(3.98). In the rectangle
x
0
x a , y
0
y b. we are given [
x=x0
=
1
(y), [
y=y0
=
2
(x) with
1
(y
0
) =
2
(x
0
) and denote
x
= ,
y
= w. Rewrite (3.98) as follows
y
=
W
x
= a(x, y) +b(x, y)W +

C(x, y)
where

C(x, y) = c(x, y) +
x
a(x, y) +
y
b(x, y) and we get a system of integral
equations
_
_
(x, y) = (x, y
0
) +
y
_
y0
[a(x, )(x, ) +b(x, )(x, ) +

C(x, )v(x, )]d
w(x, y) = w(x
0
, y) +
x
_
x0
[a(x, )(x, ) +b(x, )(x, ) +

C(x, )v(x, )]d
(x, y) =
2
(x) +
y
_
y0
(x, y)d
where (x, y
0
) =
2
(x) , w(x
0
, y) =
1
(y).
Example 3.6.3. (Green functions for Lapace operator)
Let R
3
be a bounded domain whose boundary S = is represented by smooth
functions.We are looking for a smooth function u : R satisfying Poisson equation
u = f(P), P ( -Laplace operator) (3.110)
and one of the following boundary conditions
u[
S
= F
0
(S) (Dirichlet problem) (3.111)
u
n
[
S
= F
1
(S) (Neumann problem) (3.112)
It is known that Laplace operator is self adjoint and using Green formula
___
(u u)d =
__
S
(u
n

u
n
)dS (3.113)
we see that a vanishing Dirichlet (Neumann) condition is selfadjoint as the Green
formula (3.113) shows.
3.6.3 Green function for Dirichlet problem
Denition 1
Let G(P, P
0
), P, P
0
, be a scalar function satisfying
1. G(P, P
0
) is a harmonic function (G = 0) with respect to P , P ,= P
0
2. G(P, P
0
)[
PS
= 0, S =
3. G(P, P
0
) =
1
4r
+g(P, P
0
), where r = [P P
0
[
and g is a second order continuously dierentiable function of P verifying g =
0, P .
A function G(P, P
0
) fullling 1, 2 and 3 is called a Green function for Dirichlet problem
(3.110), (3.111). The existence of a Green function satisfying 1 , 2 and 3 is analyzed
in [2](see [2] in references)
Theorem 3.6.5. Assume that the Green function G(P, P
0
) satisfying 1, 2 and 3 is
found such that the normal derivative
G
n
(s) of G at each s S exists. Then the
solution of Dirichlet problem (3.110)+(3.111) is represented by
u(P
0
)
__
S
F
0
(s)
G
n
(s)ds
___
G(P, P
0
)f(P)dxdydz
Proof. Take > 0 suciently small such that B(P
0
, ) and denote = B(P
0
, ).
Apply Green formula in the domain
= B(P
0
, ). Let u(P), P , be the solu-
tion of the Dirichlet problem (3.110)+(3.111) and denote (P) = G(P, P
0
), P
.
Both functions u(P), (P), P
, are continuously dierentiable and we get

____
G(P, P
0
)udP =
__
S
(u
G
n
G
u
n
)(s)ds (3.114)
where S
= S =
Denote nthe orthogonal vector at the surface = B(P

0
, ), [n[ = 1, oriented to the
center P
0
and n
is the orthogonal vector at oriented in the opposite direction of

n.Using G[
PS
= 0 we get
___
G(P, P
0
)f(P)dxdy dz =
__
S
F
0
(s)
G
n
(s)ds
1
4
__
(u

n
1
r

1
r
u
n
)d
__
(u
g
n
g
u
n
)d (3.115)
Letting 0 we get that the last integral in (3.115) is vanishing (see u, g are
continuously dierentiable with bounded erivatives). In addition, the second integral
in the right hand side of (3.115) will become.
lim
1
4
__
(u

n
[
1
r

1
r
u
n
)d = lim
1
4
2
__
ud lim
1
4
2
__
u
n
d = u(p
0
)
(3.116)
u(p
0
) =
__
S
F
0
(s)
u
n
(s)ds
___
G(p, p
0
)f(p)dxdydz (3.117)
Theorem 3.6.6. The function u(p
0
), p
0
given in Theorem 3.6.5 is the solution
of the Dirichlet problem (3.110)+(3.111).
Proof. It is enough to prove the existence of the Dirichlet problem solution (3.110)+(3.111).
Let be the newtonian potential with the density functionf(p) on the domain ,
(p
0
) =
1
4
___
1
r
f(p)dxdydz (3.118)
It is known that satises the following Poisson equation = f. Dene = u
and it has to satisfy
_
[S = u[S = F
0
(S) = (s)
(P) = 0, P ((P
0
) =
__
S
v
0
(s)
G
n
ds)
(3.119)
The existence of the harmonic function verifying (3.119) determines the unknown
uas a solution of the Dirichlet problem (3.110)+(3.111).
3.7. LINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS 119
3.7 Linear Parabolic Equations
The simplest linear parabolic equation is dened by the following heat equation
t
u(t, x) =
2
x
u(t, x), t > 0, x R (3.120)
lim
t0
u(t, x) = (x), x R (3.121)
C
b
(R) is xed. A solution is a continuous function u(t, x); [0, ) R R which
is second order continuously dierentiable of x R for each t > o and satisfying
(3.120) + (3.121) for some xed continuous and bounded function (
b
(R).
3.7.1 The Unique Solution of the Cauchy Problem (3.120) and
(3.121)
It is expressed as follows.
u(t, x) =
1
4t
()exp
(x )
2
4t
d (3.122)
(Poisson formula for heat equation) Denote
P(, x, y)dy = (
4)
1
exp
(y x
2
)
4
, for > 0, x, y R (3.123)
By a direct computation we get the following equations
_
R
P(, x, y)dy = 1and
P(, x, y)
2
x
P(, x, y) = 0 for any > 0, x, y R
(3.124)
The rst equation of (3.124) is obtained using a change of variable
yx
2
= z and
_
R
P(, x, y)dy =
4
_
R
P(, x, x + 2
z)dz =
1
_
R
(exp [z[
2
)dt = 1 (3.125)
where
_
R
(exp t
2
)dt =

is used. In addition, the function P(, x, y) dened in
(3.123) fulls the following.
lim
0
_
R
(y)P(, x, y)dy = (x), for eachx R (3.126)
where (
b
(R) is xed. Using (3.124) we see easily that u(t, x) : t > 0, x R
dened in (3.122) satises heat equation (3.120), provided we notice that
u(t, x) =
_
R
()P(t, x, )d, t > 0, x R (3.127)
and
_

t
u(t, x) =
_
R
()
t
P(t, x, )d,
2
x
u(t, x) =
_
R
()
2
x
P(t, x, )d,
(3.128)
The property (3.126) used for (3.127) allows one to get (3.121).
Remark 3.7.1. The unique solution of the heat equation (3.120) + (3.121) can be
expressed by the formula (3.122) even if the continuous (x) : R R satises a
polynomial growth condition
[(x)[ c(1 + [x[
N
), x R (3.129)
There is no change in proving that the unique Cauchy problem solution of the heat
equation for x R.
t
u(t, x) =
x
u(t, x), t > 0, x R (3.130)
lim
t0
u(t, x) = (x), x R
n
,
x
=
n
i=1
2
xi
(3.131)
is expressed by
u(t, x) = (4 t)
n
2
_
R
n
()exp
[x [
2
4t
d (3.132)
where (
b
(R
n
).
3.7.2 Exercises
(a
1
) Find a continuous and bounded function u(t, x); [0, T] R R fullling the
following
_
(1)
t
u(t, u) = a
2
2
x
u(t, x), t (0, T], x R, a > 0
(2) lim
t0
u(t, x) = cosx, x R.
Hint. The equation (1) can be written with the constant a
2
= 1 provided we use a
change of variable =
x
a
and denote
u(t, x) = (t,
x
a
), t [0, T], x R
Here (t, y) : [0, T] R R satises the equation
t
(t, y) =
2
y
(t, y), (t, y) (0, T] R
and initial condition (0, y) = cos(ay) (a
2
). Find a continuous and bounded function
u(t, x, y) : [0, T] R R R satisfying the following linear parabolic equation
_
(1)
t
u(t, x, y) = a
2
2
x
u(t, x, y) +b
2
2
y
u(t, x, y), t (0, T]
(2) lim
t0
u(t, x, y) = sinx +cosy, a > 0, b > 0, x, y R
Hint. The equation (1) and (2) will be rewritten using the following changes y
1
=
x
a
, y
2
=
y
b
and
u(t, x, y) = (t,
x
a
,
y
b
) where (t, y
1
, y
2
) : [0, T] R R R satisfy (see(3.130)n = 2)
_

t
=
2
y1
+
2
y2
lim
t0
(t, y
1
, y
2
) = sin(ay
1
) +cos(by
2
)
3.7.3 Maximum Principle for Heat Equation
Any continuous solution u(t, x), (t, x) [0, T][A, B], satisfying heat equation (3.120)
for 0 < t T and x (A, B) will achieve its extreme values
max
(t,x)[0,T][A,B]
u(t, x) and min
(t,x)[0,T][A,B]
u(t, x) on the boundary

D of the
domain D = (t, x) [o, T] [A, B], where
D = (0 [A, B])
_
([0, T] A)
_
([0, T] B)
Proof. Denote M = max
(t,x)D
u(t, x) , m = max
(t,x)
D
u(t, x) and assume M > m.
Let (t
0
, x
0
) D, (t
0
, x
0
) not in

D be such that u(t
0
, x
0
) = M and consider the
following auxiliary function
(t, x) = u(t, x) +
M m
2(B A)
2
(x x
0
)
2
(3.133)
We see easily that (t, x) satises
(t, x) u(t, x) +
M m
2(B A)
2
(B A)
2
m +
M m
2
< M (3.134)
for any
(t, x)

D, and (t
0
, x
0
) = u(t
0
, x
0
) = M, consider (t
1
, x
1
) = max
(t,x)D
(t, x)
M. As a consequence, (t
1
, x
1
) not in

D and
_

t
(t
1
, x
1
) = 0,
x
(t
1
, x
1
) = 0,
2
x
(t
1
, x
1
) 0, if (t
1
, x
1
) intD
t
(t
1
, x
1
) 0,
x
(t
1
, x
1
) = 0,
2
x
(t
1
, x
1
) 0, if (t
1
, x
1
) T (A, B)
(3.135)
In both cases (
t

2
x
)(t
1
, x
1
) 0 and (t
1
, x
1
) not in

D. On the other hand,using
the heat equation (3.120) satised by u(t, x) when (t, x) not in

D we get (see(3.133))
(
t

2
x
)(t
1
, x
1
) =
M m
(B A)
2
< 0 (3.136)
contradicting the above given inequality. It proves thatM m. Replacing u with
u and using
max
(t,x)D
u(t, x) = max
(t,x)
D
u(t, x)
we get the second conclusion
min
(t,x)D
u(t, x) = min
(t,x)
D
u(t, x)
Remark 3.7.2. In the above given proof we may assume that the heat equation
(3.120)
t
u(t, x) =
2
x
u(t, x) is satised for any (t, x) (0, T) (A, B) (omitting
t = T) and the result is still valid noticing that u(t, x) m for 0 t T will
imply u(t, x) mfor any 0 t T (see u is continuous). In addition, the conclusion
of the maximum principle allows to extend it for [u(t, x)[, i.e [u(t, x)[ max[u(t, x)[ :
(t, x)

D.
Remark 3.7.3. The computation and arguments used for the scalar heat equation
(3.120) can be extended to the case x R
n
replacing the equation (3.120) by (3.130)
and considering a ball B(P
, ) R
n
instead of [A, B] R. If it is the case, the
corresponding maximum principle associated with heat equation ( (3.130) says
max
(t,x)D
u(t, x) = max
(t,x)
D
u(t, x)
and
min
(t,x)D
u(t, x) = min
(t,x)
D
u(t, x)
where
D = [0, T] B(P
, ),

D = (0 B(P
, ))
([0, T] B), P
R
n
, (fixed), B =
boundary of B(P
, ).
Here the heat equation(3.130) is assumed on the domain (t, x) (0, T] int B(P
0
, )
and the corresponding auxiliary function is given by(see(3.133))
(t, x) = u(t, x) +
M m
8
2
[x x
0
[
2
,
where
u(t
0
, x
0
) = M = max
(t,x)D
u(t, x) = m = max
(t,x)
D
u(t, x)
and M = u(t
0
, x
0
) > m will lead us to a contradiction.
Remark 3.7.4. Using maximum principle for heat equation we get that the Cauchy
problem solution for (3.120)+(3.121)(or (3.130)+(3.131))) is unique provided the ini-
tial condition and the solution u(t, x) : t 0, x R
n
are restricted to the bounded
continuous functions. In this respect,let M > 0 be such that
[u(t, x)[ M, [(x)[ M for any t 0, x R(x R
n
)
Consider the following particular solution of (3.120)
(t, x) =
2M
L
2
(x
2
+ 2t) satisfying
t
=
2
x
and (0, x) =
2M
L
2
x
2
0
(+
L, t) =
2M
L
2
(L
2
+ 2t) 2M
If (3.120)+(3.121) has two bounded solutions then their dierence u(t, x) = u
1
(t, x)
u
2
(t, x) is a solution of heat equation (3.120), satisfying [u(t, x)[ 2M, (t, x)
[0, ) R,and u(0, x) = 0.On the other hand h(t, x) = (t, x) u(t, x) satises
(3.120) for any (t, x) int D, D = [L, L] [0, T] and
h(t, x) = (t, x) u(t, x) 0, (t, x)

D
Using a maximum principle we get
u(t, x)
2M
L
2
(x
2
+ 2t) (t, x) [0, T] [L, L]
and similarly for u(t, x) = u(t, x) we obtain
u(t, x)
2M
L
2
(x
2
+ 2t) (t, x) [0, T] [L, L]
Combining the last two inequalities we get
[u(t, x)[
2M
L
2
(x
2
+ 2t) (t, x) [0, T] [L, L]
and for any arbitrary xed (t, x)(t > 0) letting L we obtain u(t, x) = 0 which
proves u
1
(t, x) = u
2
(t, x) for each t > 0.
Exercise. Use the above given algorithm(n = 1)for the multidimensional heat equa-
tion (11)(n 1) and get the conclusion:the Cauchy problem solution of (3.130) +
(3.131) is unique provided initial condition and the solutionsu(t, x) : t 0, x
R are restricted to the bounded continuous functions.
Hint. Let M > 0 be such that [u(t, x)[, [(x)[ M for any t 0, x R
n
and con-
sider V (t, x =
2M
L
2
)([x[
2
+ 2t) satisfying (3.130) and (3.131) with V (0, x) =
2M
L
2
[x[
2
0(V (t, x) =
2M
L
2
)([x[
2
+ 2t) 2M if x B(0, L). Proceed as in Remark (3.7.4).
Problem P
1
(Maximum Principle for Linear Elliptic Equation)
Consider the following linear elliptic equation
0 =
n
i,j=1
a
ij
2
xixj
u(x)
= Trace[A.
2
x
u(x)]
= Trace[
2
x
u(x)A], x (bounded domain) R
n
(3.137)
where the symmetric matrix A = (a
i,j{1,...,n}
) is strictly positive denite(< x, Ax >
| x |
2
, x R
n
, for some > 0). Under the above given conditions, using an ade-
quate transformation of coordinates and function, we get a standard Laplace equation
in R
n
for which the maximum principle is valid.
(R) Show that for a continuous and bounded function u(x) : R satisfying (3.137)
for any x we get the following maximum principle:
max
x
u(x) = max
x
u(x) (min
x
u(x) = min
x
u(x)), where = , =
Hint. Let T : R
n
R
n
be and orthogonal matrix (T
= T
1
) such that
A = T DT
1
, where D = diag(d
1
, . . . , d
n
), d
i
> 0 (3.138)
Dene A
1\2
(square root of the matrix A)= T D
1
2
T
1
and make the following trans-
formations
x = A
1\2
y, (y) = u(A
1\2
y) (3.139)
Then notice that(y) : y
1
is a harmonic function satisfying
0 = (y) = Trace[
2
y
(y)], y
1
(3.140)
where
1
= [A
1\2
]
1
and
1
=
1
= [A
1\2
]
1
As far as the maximum principle is valid for (y) :

1
R satisfying (3.140)we get
that
u(x) = ([A
1\2
]
1
x), x
satises the maximum principle too.
Problen P
2
(Maximum Princie for Linear Parabolic Equations)
Consider the following linear parabolic equation
t
u(t, x) =
n
i,j=1
a
ij
2
xixj
u(t, x) = Trace[A.
2
x
u(t, x)] = Trace[
2
x
u(t, x)A] (3.141)
t (0, T] , x (bounded domain) R
n
and let u(t, x) : [0, T] R be a
continuous and bounded function satisfying the parabolic equation(3.141). If the
matrix A = (a
ij
)
i,j{1,...,n}
is symmetric and strictly positive(< x, Ax > | x |
2
, x R
n
, for some > 0)then u(x) : x satises the following maximum
3.8. WEAK SOLUTIONS(GENERALIZED SOLUTIONS) 125
principle:
max
(t,x)D
u(t, x) = max
(t,x)
D
u(t, x) ( min
(t,x)D
u(t, x) = min
(t,x)
D
u(t, x)) (3.142)
where D = [0, T] R
n+1
and

D = (0 ) ([0, T] ).
Hint. The verication is based on the canonical form we may obtain in the right hand
side of (3.141) provided the following transformations are performed
x = A
1\2
y, (t, y) = u(t, A
1\2
y), y
1
= [A
1\2
]
1
(3.143)
where the square root of a symmetric and positive matrix A
1\2
= T()
1
2
T
1
is used.
Here = diag(
1
, ...,
n
),
i
> 0 and T : R
n
R
n
is an orthogonal matrix (T
= T
1
)
such that A = T T
1
. Notice that using (3.141) we get that (t, x) : t [0, T], y
1
satises the standard heat equation
t
(t, y) =
y
(t, y) = Trace[
2
y
(t, y)], t [0, t], y
1
(3.144)
and the corresponding maximum principle
max
(t,y)D1
(t, x) = max
(t,y)
D1
(t, x) ( min
(t,y)D1
(t, x) = min
(t,y)
D1
(t, x)) (3.145)
is valid,where D
1
= [0, T] D
1
and

D
1
= (0
1
) ([0, T]
1
). Using u(t, x) =
(t, [A
1\2
]
1
x), x , and (3.145) we obtain the conclusion (3.145).
3.8 Weak Solutions(Generalized Solutions)
Separation of Variables(Fourier Method)
Boundary problems for parabolic and hyperbolic PDE can be solved using Fourier
method.We shall conne ourselves to consider the following two types of PDE
(I)
1
a
2
t
u(t, x, z) = u(t, x, y, z), t [0, T], (x, y, z) D R
3
(II)
2
t
u(t, x, z) = u(t, x, y, z), t [0, T], (x, y, z) D R
3
where the bounded domain Dhas the boundary S = D. The parabolic equation (I)
is augmented with initial conditions(Cauchy conditions)
(I
a
) u(0, x, y, z) = (x, y, z), (x, y, z) D
and the boundary conditions
(I
b
) u(t, x, y, z)[
(x,y,z)S
= 0 t [0, T]
The hyperbolic equation (II) is augmented with initial conditions
(II
a
) u(0, x, y, z) =
0
(x, y, z),
t
u(0, x, y, z) =
1
(x, y, z), (x, y, z) D
and the boundary conditions
(II
b
)
u
n
(t, x, y, z) = (
1
x
u +
2
y
u +
3
z
u)[(x, y, z) S = 0
where n = (
1
,
2
,
3
) is the unit orthogonal vector at S oriented outside of D.
3.8.1 Boundary Parabolic Problem
To solve the mixed problem (I, I
a
, I
b
) we shall consider the particular solutions satis-
fying (I, I
a
, I
b
) in the form
u(t, x, y, z) = T(t)U(x, y, z) (3.146)
It lead us directly to the following equations
U(x, y, z)
U(x, y, z)
=
1
a
2
T
(t)
T(t)
, t [0, T], (x, y, z) D (3.147)
and it implies that each term in (3.147) equals a constant and we obtain the
following equations
U +U = 0; T
(t) +a
2
T(t) = 0 (3.148)
(see T(t) = Cexp a
2
t, t [0, T]). Using (3.148) and the boundary conditions (I
b
)
we get
U(x, y, z)[
(x,y,z)S
= 0 (3.149)
The values of the parameter for which (3.148)+(3.149) has a solution are called
eigenvalues associated with linear elliptic equation U +U = 0 and boundary con-
dition (3.149). The corresponding eigenvalues are found provided a Green function is
used which allow us to rewrite the elliptic equation as a Fredholm integral equation.
Recall the denition of a Green function.
Denition 3.8.1. Let S = D be dened by second order continuously dierentiable
function.A Green function for the Dirichlet problem U = f(P), U[
S
= F
0
(S) is a
symmetric function G(P, P
0
) satisfying the following conditions with respect to P D
() G(P, P
0
) = 0, P D, P ,= P
0
,where P
0
D is xed,
() G(P, P
0
)[
S
= 0, G(P, P
0
) = G(P
0
, P), and G(P, P
0
) =
1
4r
+g(P, P
0
), r = [P P
0
[
() g(P, P
0
) is second order continuously dierentiable and g(P, P
0
) = 0, P D.
() U(P
0
) =
__
S
F
0
(s)
n
G(s)ds
___
D
G(P, P
0
)f(P)dxdydz where f(P) = U(P)
and F
0
(s) = 0, s S
The solution of the Dirichlet problem (3.148)+(3.149) can be expressed as in
Theorem 3.6.5. Under these conditions,the integral representation formula () lead
us to the following Fredholm integral equation
U(P
0
) =
___
D
G(P, P
0
)U(P)dxdydz (3.150)
where G(P, P
0
) =
1
4r
+g(P, P
0
) is an unbounded function (see
1
r
) verifying
G(P, P
0
)
1
r
, 0 < < 3, for some constant A > 0 (3.151)

Dene
G
(P, P
0
) = min(G(P, P
0
),
A
), where > 0 is fixed

We get G(P, P
0
) G
(P, P
0
) 0 P D and
0 G(P, P
0
) G
(P, P
0
) A(
1
r
) if r (3.152)
Using (3.152) and suciently small we obtain
___
D
[G(P, P
0
) G
(P, P
0
)[dP =
___
D
[G(P, P
0
) G
(P, P
0
)]dP
A
___
{r}
1
r
dP

2
where > 0 (3.153)
is arbitrarily xed.On the other hand, G
(P, P
0
) is a continuous and bounded function
for P D and approximate it by a degenerate kernel
G
(P, P
0
) =
N
i=1
i
(P)
i
(P
0
) +G
2
(P, P
0
) (3.154)
where ___
D
[G
2
(P, P
0
)[dP

2
From (3.153) and (3.154) we get that G(P, P
0
) in (3.150) can be rewritten as
G(P, P
0
) =
N
i=1
i
(P)
i
(P
0
) +G
1
(P, P
0
) (3.155)
where G
1
(P, P
0
) = G
2
(P, P
0
) + [G(P, P
0
) G
(P, P
0
)] satises
___
D
[G
1
(P, P
0
)[dP

2
+

2
= (3.156)
Using these remarks we replace the equation (3.150) by the following one
U(P
0
)
___
D
G
1
(P, P
0
)U(P)dP = [(E A
1
)U](P
0
) (3.157)
=
N
i=1
i
(P
0
)
___
D
i
(P)U(P)dP
where the operator B
1
= [E A
1
]() has an inverse
B
1
1
= [E +A
1
+
2
A
2
1
+... +
k
A
k
1
+...], for any [[ <
1
| A
1
|
, where | A
1
|

2
(3.158)
is acting from ((D) to ((D).Denote
i
(P
0
) = (B
1
1

i
)(P
0
) and rewrite (3.157) as the
following equation
U(P
0
) =
N
i=1
i
(P
0
)
___
D
i
(P)U(P)dP (3.159)
which has a nontrivial solution for any
1
,
2
, ... where the sequence
j
j1
of
real numbers satises [[ C only for a nite terms,for each constant C > 0 arbitrarily
xed. LetU
j
j1
be a sequence of solutions associated with equation (3.159) and
eigenvalues
j
j1
, they are called eigen functions. Notice that (see ()) G(P, P
0
)
is a symmetric function which allows one to see that the eigenvalues are positive
numbers,
j
> 0, and the corresponding eigenfunctions U
j
j1
can be taken such
that
___
D
U
i
(P)U
j
(P)dP =
_
0 i ,= j
1 i = j
(3.160)
U
j
j1
is a complete system in

C(D) C(D) i.e any

C(D) can be represented
(P) =
j=1
a
j
U
j
(P) (3.161)
where the series is convergent in L
2
(D)
(see
j=1
a
2
j
< ) and
lim
N
(
___
D
[
N
j=1
a
j
U
j
(P) (P)[
2
dP)
1\2
= 0
The coecients a
j
j1
describing the continuous function

C(D) are called
Fourier coecients and satisfy
___
D
(P)U
j
(P)dP = a
j
, j 1, C(D) (3.162)
is xed in I
a
. Now we are in position to dene a weak solution of mixed problem
(I, I
a
, I
b
) and it will be given as the following series
u(t, x, y, z) =
i=1
(exp
i
a
2
t)a
i
U
i
(x, y, z) (3.163)
which is convergent in L
2
(D), uniformly with respect to t [0, T]. Using (3.162) and
(3.161) the initial condition in (I
a
) is satised in a weak sense, i.e
lim
N
| u
N
(0, P) (.) |
2
= 0, u
N
(t, x, y, z) =
i=1
(exp
i
a
2
t)a
i
U
i
(x, y, z)
Here u
N
(t, x, y, z) : t [0, T], (x, y, z) D
N1
is dened as a sequence of solutions
u
N
(t, x, y, z) =
N
i=1
(exp
i
a
2
t)a
i
U
i
(x, y, z) (3.164)
satisfying the parabolic equation (3.146), the boundary condition (I
b
) and
u
N
(0, x, y, z) =
N
(x, y, z), (x, y, z) D (3.165)
such that, lim
N
|
N
|
2
= 0 ((I
a
) is weakly satised).
3.8.2 Boundary Hyperbolic Problem
To solve the mixed problem (II, II
a
, II
b
) we shall proceed as in the parabolic case
and look for a particular solution
u(t, P) = T(t)U(P), u (
2
(D), T (
2
([0, T]) (3.166)
satisfying (II) and the boundary condition(II
b
). The function (3.166) satises (II) if
T(t) U(P) = U(P)T
(t) or
T
(t)
T(t)
=
U(P)
U(P)
=
2
(const) (3.167)
which imply the equations
T
(t) +
2
T(t) = 0 (3.168)
U(P) +
2
U(P) = 0,
U
n
[
S
= 0 (3.169)
For the Ne umann problem solution in (3.169), we use a Green function G
1
(P, P
0
)
satisfying
_
G
1
=
1
C
(where C = vol D) P ,= P
0
n
G
1
[
S
= 0
(3.170)
In this case
1
C
stands for the solution of the adjoint equation
= 0,
n
[
S
= 0 (3.171)
The Green function G
1
has the structure
G
1
(P, P
0
) =
1
4r
+g(P), r = [P, P
0
[, g(P) = [P[
2
+g
1
(P) (3.172)
where g
1
veries
_
g
1
(P) = 0, P D, and
n
g
1
[
S
= [
n
[P[
2
+
1
4

n
(
1
r
)][
S
(3.173)
The constant is found such that
___
D
(G
1
)dxdydz =
1
4
___
D
(
1
r
)dxdydz + 6vol(D)
= 1 + 6vol(D) = 1 3val(D) (3.174)
In addition, using the Green function G
1
we construct a weak solution for the Ne umann
problem
U(P) = f(P), (
n
U)[S = 0 (3.175)
assuming that
___
D
f(P)dxdydz = 0 (3.176)
The Green formula (3.149) used for = G
1
and U(P : P D) satisfying (3.175)
and (31) will get the form
___
D
u(P)G
1
(P, P
0
))dxdydz =
___
D
G
1
(P, P
0
)f(P)dxdydz (3.177)
Looking for solution of (3.169) which verify
___
D
U(P)dxdydz = 0(see f(P) =
2
U(P) in (30)) (3.178)
from (3.170) and (3.177) we obtain an integral equation
U(P
0
) =
2
___
D
G
1
(P, P
0
)U(P)dxdydz, P = (x, y, z) (3.179)
which has a symmetric kernel G
1
(P, P
0
). As in the case of the parabolic mixed prob-
lem we get a sequence of eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenfunctions U
j
j1
.
In this case they are satisfying
U
j
(
2
(D),
n
U
j
[
S
= 0 and
___
D
U
j
(P)dxdydz = 0, j 1 (3.180)
Dene the space

C
0
(D)

C
1
(D) consisting from all continuously dierentiable func-
tions (
1
(D) verifying
(
n
)(P S) = 0,
___
D
(P)dxdydz = 0 and (P) =
j=1
a
j
U
j
(P),
j=1
[a
j
[
2
<
(3.181)
The boundary problem ((II), (II
b
)) has two independent solutions
(see T
1
(t) = cos
j
t, T
2
(t) = sin
j
t)
U
j
(P)cos
j
t and U
j
(P)sin
j
t, foreachj 1 (3.182)
and we are looking for a solution of the mixed problem ((II), (II
a
), (II
b
)) as a con-
vergent series
U(t, P) =
j=1
[a
j
U
j
(P)cos
j
t +b
j
U
j
(P)sin
j
t] +b
0
t (3.183)
in L
2
(D) with respect to P = (x, y, z) and uniformly with respect to t [0, T].
Here a
j
j1
must be determined as the Fourier coecients associated with initial
condition
0

C
0
(D)
0
(P) = u(0, P) =
j=1
j
u
j
(P) (3.184)
and b
j
j0
are found such that the second initial conditions
t
u(0, P) =
1
(P)
(see(II
a
)and
1

C(D)) are satised
_
1
(P) =
j=1
j
U
j
(P) +
0
, with
j=1
(
j
)
2
<
t
u(0, P) =
j=1
j
b
j
U
j
(P) +b
0
=
1
(P)
(3.185)
Here

C(D) = (
1
(D) is consisting from all continuously dierentiable functions
1
(P)
(
1
(D) satisfying
(
n
1
)(P S) = 0 and
1
(P) =
j=1
j
U
j
(P) +
0
,
j=1
[
j
[
2
< (3.186)
We get
b
0
=
0
and
j
b
j
=
j
, j 1 (3.187)
In conclusion,the mixed hyperbolic problem (II), (II
a
), (II
b
) has a generalized (weak)
solution
u(t, .) : [0, T] L
2
(D)
u(t, P) =
j=1
[a
j
cos
j
t +b
j
sin
j
t]U
j
(P) +b
0
t
such that
U
N
(t, P) =
N
j=1
[a
j
cos
j
t +b
j
sin
j
t]U
j
(P) +b
0
t
satises (II) and (II
a
) and (II
b
) is fullled in a weak sense
u
N
(0, P) =
N
0
(P),
t
u
N
(0, P) =
N
1
(P)
Here the weak sense means
lim
N
N
0
=
0
inL
2
(D)
and
lim
N
N
1
=
1
inL
2
(D)
3.8.3 Fourier Method, Exercises
Exercise 1
Solve the following mixed problem for a PDE of a parabolic type using Fourier
method _
_
_
(I)
1
a
2
t
u(t, x) =
2
x
u(t, x), t [0, T], x [0, 1]
(I
a
) u(0, x) = (x), x [0, 1], (
([0, 1]; R)
(I
b
) u(t, 0) = u(t, 1) = 0, t [0, T]
where (
([0, 1]; R) = (([0, 1]; R) : (0) = (1) = 0.

Hint. We must notice from the very beginning that the space (
([0, 1]; R) is too large

for taking Cauchy condition(I
a
) and from the way of solving we are forced to accept
only with the following structure
(x) =
j=1
U
j
(x) , x [0, 1] (3.188)
where
U
j
(x =
1
2
sinj x, j 1, x [0, 1], (orthogonal in L
2
[0, T]) (3.189)
satisfy
1
_
0
U
j
(x)
U
k
(x)dx =
_
1 j = k
0 j ,= k
and the following series
j=1
[
j
[
2
< (3.190)
is a convergent one. The Fourier method involves solutions as function of the following
form
u(t, x) =
j=1
T
j
(t)U
j
(x) +a
0
, t [0, T], x [0, 1] (3.191)
where each term U
j
(t, x) = T
j
(t)U
j
(x) satises the parabolic equation (I) and the
boundary conditions(I
b
). In this respect, from the PDE (I) we get the following
2
x
U
j
(x)
U
j
(x)
=
1
a
2
t
T
j
(t)
T
j
(t)
=
j
,
j
,= 0, t [0, T], x [0, 1], j 1 (3.192)
which are into a system
_
dTj(t)
dt
+a
2
T
j
(t) = 0 t [0, T]
d
2
Uj
dx
2
(x) +U
j
(x) = 0, x [0, 1]
(3.193)
On the other hand, to full the boundary conditions (I
b
)we need to impose
U
j
(0) = U
j
(1) = 0 , j 1 (3.194)
and to get a solution U
j
(x) : x [0, 1] satisfying the second order dierential
equation in (3.193) and the boundary conditions (3.194) we need to make the choice
j
= (j )
2
> 0, U
j
(x) = c
j
sinj x, x [0, 1], j 1 (3.195)
In addition, we get the general solution T
j
(t) satisfying the rst equation in (3.193)
T
j
(t) = a
j
[exp (ja)
2
t], t [0, T], j 1, a
j
R (3.196)
Now the constants c
j
in U
j
(x) (see (3.195)) are taken such that
U
j
(x) = c
j
sinj x, x [0, 1], j 1 (3.197)
is an orthonorma system in L
2
([0, 1]; R) and it can be satised noticing that
1
_
0
(sinj x)(sink x)dx =
1
_
0
(cos j x)(cos k x)dx
=
1
_
0
[cos(j +k)x]dx
=
1
_
0
(cos j x)(cos k x)dx
=
_
1 2 j = k
0 j ,= k
(3.198)
Here
1
_
0
(cos mx)dx = 0 for any m 1
and
coscos =
cos( +)
2
are used. From (3.198) we get
c
j
=
2 j 1
As a consequence
U
j
(x) =
2sinj x, x [0, T] , j 1 (3.199)

is an orthonormal system in L
2
([0, 1]; R) and the series in (3.191) becomes
U(t, x) =
j=1
a
j
U
j
(x)[exp (ja)
2
t] +a
0
(3.200)
Now we are looking for the constants a
j
, j 0 such that the series in (3.200) is
uniformly convergent on (t, x) [0, T] [0, 1] and in addition the initial condition(I
a
)
must be satised
U(0, x) =
j=1
a
j
U
j
(x) +a
0
= (x) =

U(0, x) =
j=1
U
j
(x) (3.201)
where
j=1
[
j
[
2
< is assumed (see(3.190)). As a consequence a
0
= 0 and a
j
=
j
, j 1, are the corresponding Fourier coecients associated with satisfying
(3.188) and (3.190).
In conclusion, the uniformly convergent series given in (3.200) has the form
u(t, x) =

U(t, x) =
j=1
U
j
(x)[exp (j a)
2
t], t [0, T], x [0, 1] (3.202)
It is the weak solution of the problem (I), (II
a
), (II
b
) in a sense that
U
N
(t, x) =
N
j=1
U
j
(x)[exp (j a)
2
t] (3.203)
satises the following properties
lim
N
U
N
(t, x) =

U(t, x) uniformly of t [0, 1] (3.204)
each
U
N
(t, x) : (t, x) [0, T] [0, 1] fulfills (I) and (I
b
) (3.205)
U(0, x) = (x) , x [0, 1] , ((I

a
) is satisfied for u) (3.206)
provided (
0
([0, 1]; R) full (3.188) and (3.190).
Exercise 2
Solve the following mixed problem for a PDE of hyperbolic type using Fourier method
_
_
_
(I)
2
t
u(t, x) =
2
x
u(t, x), t [0, T], x [0, 1]
(I
a
) u(0, x) =
0
(x),
t
u(0, x) =
1
(x), x [0, 1],
0
,
1
(([0, 1]; R)
(I
b
)
x
u(t, 0) =
x
u(t, 1) = 0, t [0, T]
Hint. As in the previous exercise treating a mixed problem for parabolic equation
we must notice that the space of continuous (([0, 1]; R) is too large for the initial
conditions (II
a
) considered here. From the way of solving we are forced to accept
only
0
,
1
(([0, 1]; R) satisfying the following conditions
0
(x) =
j=1
j
V
j
(x) +
0
,
1
(x) =
j=1
j
V
j
(x) +
0
, x [0, 1] (3.207)
where
V
j
(x) =
2cos j x, x [0, 1]
j1
(3.208)
2
[0, 1], and the corresponding Fourier coecients
j
,
j
j1
dene convergent series
j=1
[
j
[
2
< ,
j=1
[
j
[
2
< (3.209)
The Fourier method involves solutions u(t, x) : [0, T] [0, 1] Rpossessing partial
derivative
t
u(0, x) : [0, 1] Rand it must be of the following form
u(t, x) =
j=1
T
j
(t)V
j
(x) +a
0
+b
0
t , t [0, T] , x [0, 1] (3.210)
Each term u
j
(t, x) = T
j
(t)V
j
(x) must satisfy the hyperbolic equation (II) and the
boundary conditions(II
b
). It implies the following system of ODE
_
d
2
Tj(t)
dt
2

j
T
j
(t) = 0 , t [0, T], j 1
d
2
Vj(t)
dx
2

j
V
j
(t) = 0 , x [0, T], j 1
(3.211)
and, in addition, the boundary conditions
dV
j
dx
(0) =
dV
j
dx
(1) = 0 , j 1 (3.212)
are fullled. The conditions (3.212) implies
j
=
2
j
= (j )
2
and V
j
(x) =
2cos j x : x [0, 1]
j1
(3.213)
2
[0, 1]. On the other hand, using
j
= (j)
2
, j 1
(see(3.213)), from the rst equation in (3.211) we get
T
j
(t) = a
j
(cos j t) +b
j
(sinj t), t [0, T], j 1 (3.214)
Using (3.213) and (3.214), we are looking for (a
j
, b
j
)
j0
such that u(t, x) : (t, x)
[0, t] [0, 1] dened in (3.210) is a function satisfying initial condition
u(0, x) =
j=1
a
j
V
j
(x) +a
0
=
0
=
j=1
j
V
j
(x) +
0
, x [0, 1] (3.215)
In addition ,the function
t
u(t, x) : (t, x) [0, T] [0, 1] is a continuous one satis-
fying initial condition
t
u(0, x) =
j=1
(j )b
j
V
j
(x) +b
0
=
1
(x) =
j=1
j
V
j
(x) +
0
, x [0, 1] (3.216)
From the condition (3.215) and (3.216) and assuming (3.209) we get (a
j
, b
j
)
j1
of the
following form
a
j
=
j
, (j )b
j
=
j
, j 1 , and a
0
=
0
b
0
=
0
(3.217)
As a consequence, the series
u(t, x) =
j=1
[a
j
(cos j t) +b
j
(sinj t)]V
j
(x) +a
0
+b
0
t (3.218)
with the coecients (a
j
, b
j
)
j1
determined in (3.217) as a function for which each
term u(t, x) = a
j
(cos j x) + b
j
(sunj x)V
j
(x) satises the hyperbolic equation (II)
and the boundary conditions (II
b
). As a consequence, the uniformly convergent series
3.9. SOME NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC AND PARABOLIC PDE 137
(3.218) satises the mixed problem (II), (II
a
) and (II
b
) in the weak sense, i.e
u
N
(t, x) =
N
j=1
u
j
(t, x) +a
0
+b
0
t, (t, x) [0, T] [0, 1]
veries (II) and (II
b
) for each N 1 and
lim
N
u
N
(0, x) =
0
(x), lim
N
t
u
N
(0, x) =
1
(x), x [0, 1] (3.219)
stand for the initial conditions (II
a
).
3.9 Some Nonlinear Elliptic and Parabolic PDE
3.9.1 Nonlinear Parabolic Equation
We consider the following nonlinear parabolic PDE
_
(
t
)(u)(t, x) = F(x, u(t, x),
x
u(t, x)), t (0, T], x R
n
lim
t0
u(t, x) = 0 , x R
n (3.220)
where
x
u(t, x) = (
1
u, ...,
n
u)(t, x),
i
u =
u
xi
,
t
u =
u
t
, u =
n
i=1
2
i
u. Here
F(x, u, p) : R
2n+1
Ris a continuous function satisfying
[F(x, u
0
, p
0
)[ C, [F(x, u
2
, p
2
) F(x, u
1
, p
1
)[ L([u
2
u
1
[ +[p
2
p
1
[) (3.221)
for any x R
n
, [u
i
[, [p
i
[ , i = 0, 1, 2, where L, C, > 0 are some xed constants.
A standard solution for (3.220) means a continuous function u(t, x) : [0, a] R
n
Rwhich is rst order continuously derivable of t (0, a) second order continuously

derivable with respect to x = (x
1
, ...x
n
) R
n
such that (3.220) is satised for any
t (0, a), x R
2
a weak solution for (3.220) means a pair of continuous functions
(u(t, x),
x
u(t, x); [0, a] R
n
R
n+1
which are bounded such that the following
system of integral equations is satised
_
_
u(t, x) =
t
_
0
[
_
R
n
F(y, u(s, y),
y
)u(s, y)P(t s, x, y)dy]ds
x
u(t, x) =
t
_
0
[
_
R
n
F(y, u(s, y),
y
u(s, y))
x
P(t s, x, y)dy]ds
(3.222)
for any t [0, a], x R
n
, where P(, x, y), > 0, x, y R
n
is the fundamental
solution of the parabolic equation (

x
)P = 0, > 0, x, y R
n
P(, x, y) = (4)
n
2
exp
[y x[
2
4
, > 0 (3.223)
A direct computation shows that P(, x, y) satisfy the following properties
_
R
n
P(, x, y)dy = 1,
P(, x, y)
x
P(, x, y) (3.224)
for any > 0, x, y R
n
and
lim
0
P(, x, y) = 0 if x ,= y
The unique solution for theintegral equation (3.222) is found using the standard ap-
proximations sequence dened recurrently by
(u, P)
0
(t, x) = (0, 0) R
n+1
and
_
_
u
k+1
(t, x) =
t
_
0
[
_
R
n
F(y, u
k
(s, y), p
k
(s, y))P(t s, x, y)dy]ds
p
k+1
(t, x) =
x
u
k+1
(t, x) =
t
_
0
[
_
R
n
F(y, u
k
(s, y), p
k
(s, y))
x
P(t s, x, y)dy]ds
(3.225)
for any k 0, (t, x) [0, a] R
n
where a > 0 is suciently small such that
a C , 2
a C C
1
(3.226)
Here the constants C, > 0 are given in the hypothesis (3.221) and C
1
> 0 xed
satises
()
n\2
_
R
n
[z[(exp [z
2
[)dz C
1
(3.227)
A constant a > 0 verifying (3.226) allows one to get the boundedness of the sequence
(u
k
, p
k
)
k1
as in the following lemma
Lemma 3.9.1. Let F ((R
2n+1
, R) be given such that the hypothesis (3.221) is
veried. Fix a > 0 such that (3.226) are satised. Then the sequence (u
k
, p
k
)
k0
of continuous functions constructed in (3.225) has the following properties
[u
k
(t, x)[ , [p
k
(t, x)[ , (t, x) [0, a] R
n
, k 0 (3.228)
| (u
k+1
, p
k+1
(t) (u
k
, p
k
)(t)) | = sup
xR
n
[[u
k+1
(t, x) u
k
(t, x)[ (3.229)
[p
k+1
(t, x) p
k
(t, x)[] 2C
k
a
(
t
k
k!
)
1\3
3.9. SOME NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC AND PARABOLIC PDE 139
for any t [0, a] , k 0 where C
a
= L(C
1
a +a
2\3
).
Remark 3.9.2. Using the conclusion (3.229) of Lemma (3.9.1) and Lipschitz con-
tinuity of F in (3.221) we get that the sequence (u, p)
k
k0
is uniformly convergent of
(t, x) [0, a]R
n
, lim
k
(u, p)
k
(t, x) = ( u, p)(t, x) there the continuous function( u, p), t
[0, a], x R
n
satises the integral equation (3.222), provided the constant a > 0 is
xed such that
(
a
2
1
3
).C
a
= < 1 (3.230)
where C
a
is given in (3.229). In this respect,
(t, x) =
k=0
[(u, p)
k+1
(u, p)
k
](t, x) is
bounded by a numerical convergent series [
(t, x)[ 2(1 ++, ..... +

k
+...) =
2
1
which alow us to obtain the following
Lemma 3.9.3. Let F ((R
2n+1
, R) be given such that the hypothesis (3.221) is sat-
ised. Then there exists a unique solution ( u(t, x), ptt, x), t [0, a], R
n
, verifying
the integral equations (3.222) and
[ u(t, x)[, [ p(t, x)[ (forall)t [0, a], R
n
(3.231)
x
u(t, x) = p(t, x)t [0, a], x R
n
(3.232)
In addition, (( u(t, x),
x
u(t, x))) is the unique weak solution of the nonlinear equation
(3.229), i.e
limt
0
(
t
)u
(t, x) = F(x, u(t, x),

x
u(t, x)) (3.233)
for each 0 < t a, x R
n
where
u
(t, x)
t
_
0
[
_
R
n
F(y, u, s, y),
y
u(s, y)P(t s, x, y)dy]ds
if 0 < t = a and x R
n
are xed.
3.9.2 Some Nonlinear Elliptic Equations
We consider the following nonlinear elliptic equation
u(x) = f(x, u(x)), x R
2
, n 3 where f(x, u) : R
n+1
R (3.234)
is rst order continuously dierentiable satisfying
f(x, u) = 0for x B(0, b), u R, where B(0, b) R
n
is xed (3.235)
= max[
t
u
[; x B(0, b), [u[ 2K
1
(3.236)
satises K
0
= (0,
1
2
) where
K
0
=
2b
2
n 2
, K
1
= C
0
K
0
andC
0
= max[f(x, 0)[; x B(0, b)
Lemma 3.9.4. Assume that f(x, u); (x, u) R
n+1
is given satisfying the hypothesis
(3.235) and (3.236). Then there exits a unique bounded solution of the nonlinear
equation (3.234) u(x); R
n
R. which satises the following integral equation
u(x) =
_
R
n
f(y, u(y)[y x[
2n
dy =
_
B(o,b)
f(y, u(y))[y x[
2n
dy (3.237)
where

f(x, u) =

Cf(x, u) and

C =
1
(2n)|0|
, [[ = measS(0, 1).
Remark 3.9.5. The proof of this result usees the standard computation performed
for the Poisson equation in the rst section of this chapter. More precisely, let
0
=
S(0, 1) R
n
be the sphere centered at origin and with radius = 1. Denote [
0
[ =
meas
0
and

f(x, u) =

Cf(x, u), (x, u) R
n
R where c =
1
(2n)|0|
. Associate the
integral equation (3.237) which can be rewritten as
u(x) =
_
D
f(x +z, u(x +z)).[z[

2n
dz, forx B(o, b) (3.238)
whereD = B(0, L), L = 2b. Dene a sequence u
k
(x); x B(0, b)k 0u
0
(x) = 0, x
B(0, b)
u
k+1
(x) =
_
D
f(x +z, u
k
(x +z))[z[
2n
dz, k 0, x B(0, b) (3.239)
The sequence u
k
k0
is bounded and uniformly convergent to a continuous function
as following estimates show
[u
1
(x)[ cC
0
L
_
0
rdr
_
0
dw =
C
0
n 2
L
2
2
=
C
0
n 2
2b
2
= K
1
(3.240)
for any x B(0, b) and
[u
2
(x) u, (x)[
_
D
1 +

f((x +z), (x +z))

f(x +z, 0)[z[
2n
dz (3.241)
K
1
max[
f
u
(y, u)[
_
S
[z[
2n
dz K
1
(.K
0
) = K
1
forany x B(0, b)
An induction argument leads us to
[u
k+1
(x) u
k
(x)[ K
1
k
, x B(0, b), k 0 (3.242)
3.10. EXERCISES 141
where (0, 1 2) and k
1
> 0 are dened in (3.236). Rewrite
u
k+1
= u
1
(x) +u
2
(x) u
1
(x) + +u
k+1
(x) u
k
(x) (3.243)
and consider the following series of continuous functions
(x) = u
(
x) +
2
(x) + +
k+1
(x) +. . . (3.244)
x B(0, b),
j+1
(x) = u
j+1
(x) u
j
(x)
The series in (3.244) is dominated by a convergent numerical series
[
(x)[ K
1
(1 + +
2
+ +
k
+. . . ) = K
1
1
1
2K
1
(3.245)
and the sequence dened in (3.239) is uniformly convergent to a continuous and
bounded function
lim
k
u
k
(x) = u(x), [ u(x)[ 2K
1
, x B(0, b) (3.246)
In addition u(x), x B(0, b) veries
u(x)
_
R
n
f(y, u(y))[y x[
2n
dy =
_
B(0,b)
f(y, u(y))[y x[
2n
dy (3.247)
The solution u(x), x B(0, b) is extended as a continuous function on R
n
using
the same as integral equation (see (3.247)) and the proof of (3.237) is complete.
3.10 Exercises
Weak solutions for parabolic and hyperbolic boundary problems by Fouriers method
(P
1
). Using Fourier method, solve the following mixed problem for a scalar parabolic
equation
_
_
_
(a)
t
u(t, x) =
2
x
u(t, x) , t [0, T], x [A, B]
(b) u(0, x) =
0
(x) , x [A, B] ,
0
(([A, B])
(c) u(t, A) = u
A
, u(t, B) = u
B
, t [0, T], u
A
, u
B
R given
(3.248)
Hint. Make a function transformation
(t, x) = u(t, x)
x A
B A
u
B
+
B x
B A
u
A
(3.249)
which preserve the equation (a) but the boundary condition (c) becomes
(t, A) = 0, (t, B) = 0, t [0, T]. The interval [A, B] is shifted into [0, 1] by the
following transformations
x = By + (1 y)A, w(t, y) = (t, By + (1 y)A), y [0, 1], t [0, T] (3.250)
The new function w(t, y) : y [0, T], y [0, 1] fulls a standard mixed problem for
a scalar parabolic equation
_
_
(a)
t
w(t, y) =
1
(BA)
2
2
y
w(t, y), t [0, T], y [0, 1]
(b) w(0, y) =
1
(y)
def
=
0
(A + (B A)y) u
B
y +u
A
(1 y)
(c) w(t, 0) = 0 , w(t, 1) = 0 , t [0, T]
(3.251)
w(t, y) =
j=1
T
j
(t)W
j
(t) (3.252)
where
T
j
(t)
T
j
(t)
=
W
j
(y)
W
j
(y)
1
(B A)
2
=
j
,
j
> 0, j = 1, 2, ... (3.253)
The boundary condition ((3.248), c) must be satised by the general solution
W
j
(y) = C
1
cos (B A)
_
j
y +C
2
sin(B A)
_
j
y (3.254)
of (3.253) which implies C
1
= 0 and
j
= (B A)
2
(j)
2
(P
2
). Using Fourier method, solve the following mixed problem for a scalar parabolic
equation
_
_
_
(a)
2
t
u(t, x) =
2
x
u(t, x) , t [0, T], x [A, B]
(b) u(0, x) =
0
(x) ,
t
u(0, x) =
1
(x) , x [A, B] ,
0
,
1
(([A, B])
(c) u(t, A) = u
A
, u(t, B) = u
B
, t [0, T], u
A
, u
B
R given
Hint. Make a function transformation
(t, x) = u(t, x)
x A
B A
u
B
+
B x
B A
u
A
(3.255)
which preserve the hyperbolic equation (a) but the boundary condition (c) becomes
(3.256)
The interval [A, B] is shifted into [0, 1] with preserving the boundary (3.256) if the
following transformation are done
x = By + (1 y)A, w(t, y) = (t, By + (1 y)A), y [0, 1], t [0, T] (3.257)
3.11. APPENDIX I 143
The new function w(t, y) : y [0, T], y [0, 1] fulls a standard mixed problem for
a scalar parabolic equation
_
_
(a)
2
t
w(t, y) =
1
(BA)
2
2
y
w(t, y), t [0, T], y [0, 1]
(b)
_
w(0, y) =
0
(y)
def
=
0
(A + (B A)y) u
B
y +u
A
(1 y), y [0, 1]
t
w(0, y) =
1
(y)
def
=
1
(A + (B A)y), y [0, 1]
(c) w(t, 0) = 0 , w(t, 1) = 0 , t [0, T]
(3.258)
Solution of (3.258) has the form
w(t, y) =
j=1
T
j
(t)W
j
(t) +C
0
+C
1
t (3.259)
and the algorithm of solving repeats the standard computation given (P
1
).
3.11 Appendix I Multiple Riemann Integral and Gauss
-Ostrogradsky Formula
(A1) We shall recall the denition of the simple Riemann integral f(x) : x [a, b].
Denote by a partition of the interval [a, b] R:
= a = x
0
x
1
... x
i
x
i+1
... x
N
= b and for x
i
= x
i+1

x
i
, i 0, 1, ..., N 1, dene the norm d() = max
i
x
i
of the partition . For
i
[x
i
, x
i+1
], i 0, 1, ..., N 1 (marked points of ) associate the integral sum
S
(f) =
N1
i=0
f(
i
)x
i
Denition 3.11.1. A number I(f) is called Riemann integral of the function f(x) :
x [a, b] on the interval [a, b] if for any > 0 there is a > 0 such that
[S
(f) I(f)[ < satisfying d() < .

Remark 3.11.2. An equivalent denition can be expressed using sequences of parti-
tions
k
k1
for which
lim
k
S
k
(f) = I(f),
where the number I(f) does not depend on the sequence
k
k1
and its marked
points. If it is the case we call the number I(f) as the integral of the function f(x)
on the interval [a, b] and write
_
b
a
f(x)dx = lim
k
S
k
(f)
Finally, there is a third equivalent denition of the integral which uses a limit fol-
lowing a direction. Let E be consisting of the all partitions associated with their
marked points, for a xed > 0, denote E
E the subset satisfying d() < ,

E
. The subsets E
E, for dierent > 0, are directed using d() 0. The

integral of the function f(x) : x [a, b] is the limit J(f) of the integral sums fol-
lowing this direction; the three integrals J(f),
_
b
a
f(x)dx and I(f) exist and are equal
i one of them exists. It lead us to the conclusion that an integral of a continuous
function f(x) : x [a, b] exists.
(A2) Following the above given steps we may and do dene the general meaning of
a Riemann integral when the interval [a, b] R is replaced by some metric space
(X,d). Consider that a family of subsets U X of X are given verifying the following
conditions:
1. The set X and the empty set belong to |
2. f A
1
, A
2
| then their intersection A
1
A
2
belongs to |.
3. If A
1
, A U and A
1
A then there exist A
2
, ..., A
p
| such that A =
A
1
... A
p
and A
2
, ..., A
p
| are mutually disjoints. A system of subsets
u X fullling (1), (2) and (3) is called demi-ring |. In order to dene a
Riemann integral on the metric space X associated with a demi-ring we need
to assume another two conditions.
4. For any > 0, there is a partition of the set X = A
1
... A
p
, with A
i
|,
A
i
A
j
= if i ,= j and d(A
i
) = sup
(x,y)Ai
(x, y) < , i 1, ..., p (This condition
remind us the property that X is a precompact metric space). The last condition
imposed on the demi-ring | gives the possibility to measure each individual of
U.
5. For each A |, there is positive number m(A) 0 such that m : | [0, )
is additive, i.e m(A) = m(A
1
) + m(A
2
) +... + m(A
p
), if A = A
1
... A
p
and
A
1
, ..., A
p
are mutually disjoints.
The additive mapping m : U [0, ) satisfying (5) is called measure on the cells
composing |. The metric space X associated with a demi-ring of cells U and a nite
additive measure m : u [0, ) satisfying (1)-(5) will be called a measured space
(X, |, m). Let f(x) : X R be a real function dened on a measured space (X, |, m)
and for an arbitrary partition = A
1
, ..., A
p
of x = A
1
... A
p
(A
i
A
j
=
1
i ,= j)
dene an integral sum.
S
(f) =
i=1
f(
i
)mA
i
, where
i
A
i
is fixed (3.260)
The number
I
(f) =
_
X
f(x)dx (3.261)
is called the integral of the function f on the measured space (X, |, m) if for any
> 0, there is a > 0 such that
[I
(f) S
(f)[ < (3.262)

is veried for any partition satisfying d() < , where d() = max(d(A
1
), ..., d(A
p
))
and d(A
i
) = sup
(x,y)Ai
(x, y). It is easily seen that this denition of an integral on a
measured space (X, |, m) coincides with the rst denition of the Riemann integral
given on a closed interval [a, b] R.
The other two equivalent denitions using sequence of partitions
k
k1
, d(
k
) 0,
and a limit following a direction will replicate the corresponding denitions in the
one dimensional case x [a, b].
A function f(x) : X, |, m Rdened on a measured space and admitting Riemann
integral is called integrable on X , f J(X). The following elementary properties of
the integral are direct consequence of the denition using sequence of partitions and
their integral sums
_
X
f(x)dx = c m(X), if f(x) = c(const), x X (3.263)
_
X
cf(x)dx = c
_
X
f(x)dx, f J(X) and c = const (3.264)
_
X
[f(x) +g(x)]dx =
_
x
f(x)dx +
_
X
g(x)dx, if f, g J(X) (3.265)
Any f J(X) is bounded onX, [f(x)[ c, x X (3.266)
if f, g J(X) and f(x) g(x), x X then
_
X
f(x)dx
_
X
g(x)dx(
_
X
f(x)dx
_
X
[f(x)[dxif f[f[ J(X)) (3.267)
C m(x)
_
X
f(x)dx C m(x), if f J(X) and c f(x) C x X . (3.268)
Theorem 3.11.3. If a sequence f
k
(x) : x X
k1
J(X) converges uniformly on
X, |, m to a function f(x) : X R then f J(X) and
_
X
f(x)dx = lim
n
_
X
f
n
(x)dx
Hint The proof replicates step by step the standard proof used for X = [a, b] R
Example 3.11.1. (e
1
) X = [a, b] R and for a cell of [a, b] can be taken any
subinterval containing or not including its boundary points. The measure m(A) =
, (A = [, ], A = (, )) of a cell is the standard length of it and the corre-
sponding measured space (X, |, m) satisfy the necessary conditions (1)-(5). Notice
that the rst denition of the integral given in (3.262) coincides with that denition
used in the denition (3.11.1)
(e
2
) Let X be a rectangle in R
2
, X = x R
2
: a
1
x
1
b
1
, a
2
x
2
b
2
and as a cell of X we take any subset A X , A = x X :

1
x
1

1
,
2

x
2

2
where the sign means the standard or < among real
numbers.The measure m(A) associated with the cell Ais given by its area m(A) =
(
1
1
).(
2
2
).The necessary condition (1)-(5) are satised by a direct inspection
and the Riemann integral on X will be denoted by
_
X
f(x)dx =
_
b1
a1
_
b2
a2
f(x
1
, x
2
)dx
1
dx
2
( double Riemann integral)
Replacing R
2
by R
n
, n 2 and choosing X =
n
i=1
I
i
as a direct product of some inter-
vals I
i
= x R : a
i
x b
i
we dene a cell A =
n
i=1
i
x
i
and its volume
m(A) =
n
i=1
(
i

i
) as the associated measure.In this case the Riemann integral is
denoted by
_
X
f(x)dx =
_
b1
a1
. . .
_
bn
an
f(x
1
, . . . , x
n
)dx
1
. . . dx
n
and call it as the n-multiple integral of f.
Theorem 3.11.4. Let X, |, m be a measured space and (x) : X Ris a uni-
formly continuous function. Then f is integrable, f J(X).
Proof. By hypothesis the oscillation of the function f on X
w
f
(X, ) = sup
(x
,x
),x
,x
X
[f(x
) f(x
)[ (3.269)
satises w
f
(X, ) for some > 0 arbitrarily xed provided > 0 is suciently
small. In particular,this property is valid on any elementary subset P X , P =
p
i=1
A
i
, A
1
, . . . , A
p
are mutually disjoint cells.Denote w
f
(P, ) the corresponding os-
cillation of f restricted to P and notice
[S
(f, P) S
(f, P)[ w
f
(P, )m(P) (3.270)
for any partition
of P containing the given partition = A

1
, . . . , A
p
of the
elementary subset P X(
).
The property
is described by
is following (
is more rene). Using

(3.270) for P = x noticing that w
f
(X, ) for > 0, arbitrarily xed provided
> 0 is suciently small, we get that
lim
()0
S
(f) = I(f) exists

as a consequence of the Cauchy criteria applied to integral sums.
Consequence Any continuous function dened on a compact measured space (X, |, m)
is integrable(see f(x) : X R is uniformly continuous).
Theorem 3.11.5. Let (X, |, m) be a measured space and Z X is a negligible
set.Assume that the bounded function f(x) is uniformly continuous outside of any
arbitrary neighborhood of Z, |
(Z) = x X : (x, Z) < . Then f is integrable on

X.
Proof. By hypothesis Z is a negligible set and for any > 0 there is an elementary
set P =
p
i=1
A
i
such that intP Z and m(P) < . Let M = sup
xX
[f(x)[ and for > 0
dene
P =
p
_
i=1
A
i
such that int P Z and m(P)

4M
(3.271)
Denote B = X P and we get d(Z, B) = 2 > 0 where d(Z, B) = infd(z, b) : z
Z, b B. By hypothesis,the function f is uniformly continuous outside of a neigh-
borhood |
(Z) ,of the negligible set Z, i.e f(x) : Q R is uniformly continuous,

where Q = X |
(Z). Using Theorem 3.11.4 we get that f restricted to (Q, |Q, m)

is integrable and any integral sum of f on X restricted to P is bounded by (see
intP Z, m(P)

4M
).
For an arbitrary partition = C
1
, . . . , C
n
of X we divide it into two classes;
the rst class contains all cells of which are included in P =
p
i=1
A
i
Z
1
and
the second class is composed by the cells of which have common points with
the set B = X P and are entirely contained in B. In particular, take a par-
tition with d() < = min(, ) where > 0 is suciently small such that
[f(x
) f(x
)[ < 2m(X) if (x
, x
) < 2, x
, x
B. Let
be a follow-
ing partition(
is more rened than ). A straight computation allows one to see that

[S
(f) S
(f)[ [S
(f, P)[ +[S
(f, P)[ +[S
(f, Q) S
(f, Q)[ (3.272)

Q = X |
(Z) the rst two terms in (3.272) full

_
_
[S
(f, P)[ M
p
i=1
m(A
i
) = M m(P) M. 4M = 4
[S
(f, P)[ M
p
i=1
m(A
i
) = M m(P) = 4
(3.273)
For the last term in (3.272) we use (3.270) in the proof of Theorem 3.11.5 and Q =
X |
(Z) X P = B. As far as > d() d(
) and = min(, ) we obtain

_
[S
(f, Q) S
(f, Q)[ w
f
(Q, )m(X) [ 2m(X)]m(X) = 2
[S
(f) S
(f)[
(3.274)
and the Cauchy criteria used for integral sums S
(f) : d() 0 lead us to the

conclusion.The proof is complete.
Denition 3.11.6. Let X, |, m be a measured space and G X a subset. We say
that G is a jordanian set with respect to (|, m) if its boundary G = G X G,
is a negligible set. A jordanian closed set A with the property int A = A is called a
jordanian body.
Remark 3.11.7. The characteristic function of a jordanian set G X
G
(x) =
_
1 x G
0 x X G
is an integrable function if the measured space X, |, m is compact;
_
X

G
(x)dx =
[G[ is called volume of G.
Denition 3.11.8. A measured space X, |, m for which all cells are jordanian sets
is called normally measured;each cell A | has a volume and m(A) = vol A = [A[
Let f(x) : X R be a bounded function on a compact measured space X, |, m
and G X is a jordanian set with the boundary = G. By denition, the integral
of the function f on the set G is given by
_
G
f(x)dx =
_
X
f(x)
G
(x)dx (3.275)
If f is a continuous function on G except a negligible Z then f(x)
G
(x) is continuous
on X except the negligible set Z G and (3.275) exists.
(A
2
) Integration and derivation in R
n
; Gauss-Ostrogradsky formula
Consider a domain G R
n
(a jordanian body)for which the boundary G is piecewise
smooth surface. By piecewise smooth G we mean that S = G =
q
p=1
S
p
where
(int S
i
) (int S
j
) = for any i ,= j 1, . . . , q and for each x int S
p
, there is a
neighborhood V R
n
and a rst order continuously dierentiable mapping
y = (u) =
n1
i=1
(a
i
, a
i
) = D
n1
S
p
V, (0) = x such that
rank |
(u)
u
|= n 1. Denote = (
1
, ...,
n
), u = (u
1
, ..., u
n1
) and dene the
vectorial product of the vectors [

u1
(u), ...,

un1
(u)] R
n
as a vector of R
n
given
by the following formula
N = det
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
e
1
. . .

e
n
1
u1
(u)
n
u1
(u)
. .
. .
. .
1
un1
(u) . . .
n
un1
(u)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
= [

u
1
(u), ...,

u
n1
(u)] (3.276)
where
e
1
, ...,
e
n
R
n
is the canonical basis of R
n
and the formal writing of (3.276)
stands for a simple rule of computation, when the components of [

u
1
(u), ...,

u
n1
(u)]
R
n
are involved. In addition, (3.276) allows one to se easily that N is orthogonal
to any vector

ui
(u) R
n
, i 1, ..., n 1 and as a consequence N is orthogonal
to the point (u) S
p
. In this respect, the scalar product < N,

ui
(u) > coincides
with the computation of the following expression
< N,

u
i
(u) >= det
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
ui
(u)
u1
(u)
.
.
.
un1
(u)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
= 0 for each i 1, .., n 1 (3.277)
If it is the case then the computation of the oriented surface integral
_
S
f(x)dS on the
surface S = S
1
, ..., S
q
will be dened by the following formula
_
S
f(x)dS =
_
Dn1
f((u))[N[du (3.278)
where [N[ stands for the length of the vector N dened in (3.276). On the other
hand, the normalized vector
m(u) = N/[N[ (3.279)
can be oriented in two opposite directions with respect to the domain G and for the
Gauss-Ostrogradsky formula we need to consider that m(u) is oriented outside of the
domain G. Rewrite m(u) in ((3.279) as
m(u) =

e
1
cos
1
+ ... +
e
n
cos
n
(3.280)
where
i
is the angle of the unitary vector m(u) and the axis x
i
, i 1, ..., n. Let
P(x) = P(x
1
, ..., x
n
) be a rst order continuously dierentiable function in the domain
G. Assume that G R
n
is simple with respect to each axis x
k
, k 1, ..., n. Then
the following formula is valid
_
G
P(x)
x
k
dx =
_
S
(cos
k
)P(x)dS , for each k 1, ..., n (3.281)
where S = G and the surface integral
_
S
is oriented outside of the domain G.
Theorem 3.11.9. (Gauss(1813)-Ostrogradsky(1828-1834)formula)
Let P
k
(x) : G R
n
R, be a continuously dierentiable function for each k
1, ..., n and assume that the jordanian domain G is simple with respect to each axis
x
k
, k 1, ..., n. Then the following formula is valid
_
G
[
P
1
x
1
(x) +... +
P
n
x
n
(x)]dx =
_
S
[(cos
1
)P
1
(x) +... + (cos
n
)P
n
(x)]dS (3.282)
where the surface integral
_
S
is oriented outside of the domain G and S = G
Proof. The meaning that G is simple with respect to each axis x
k
, k 1, ..., n will
be explained for k = n and let Q R
n1
be the projection of the domain G on the
hyperplane determined by coordinates x
1
, ..., x
n1
= x. It is assumed that Q R
n1
is jordanian domain(see jordanian body given in denition 3.11.6 of (A
1
))and the
jordanian domain G R
n
can be described by the following inequalities
(x
1
, ..., x
n1
) x
n
(x
1
, ..., x
n1
) , (x
1
, ..., x
n1
) = x Q (3.283)
where ( x) ( x) , x Q are continuously dierentiable functions. The surface
x
n
= ( x), ( x, x
n
) G is denoted by S
u
(upper surface)and x
n
= ( x), ( x, x
n
) G
will be denoted by S
b
(lower surface). Notice that the unitary vector m dened in
(3.279) must be oriented outside of G at each point p S
u
. It implies< m, e
n
> 0,
similarly < m, e
n
> 0 for each p S
b
. A direct computation of the orthogonal vector
N at each point of the surfaces S
u
= x
n
( x) = 0 and S
u
= x
n
( x) = 0 will
lead us to
< m, e
n
>=< N [N[, e
n
>=
_
1 (1 +[
x
( x)[
2
)
1\2
, x S
u
1 (1 +[
x
( x)[
2
)
1\2
, x S
b
(3.284)
Using the standard decomposition method of a multiple integral into its iterated parts
we get
_
G
P
n
(x)
x
n
=
_
Q
[
_
xn=( x)
xn=( x)
P
n
x
n
( x, x
n
)dx
n
]d x
=
_
Q
P
n
( x, ( x))d x
_
Q
P
n
( x, ( x))d x
=
_
Q
P
n
( x, ( x)) < m, e
n
> (1 +[
x
( x)[
2
)
1\2
d x
+
_
Q
P
n
( x, ( x)) < m, e
n
> (1 +[
x
( x)[
2
)
1\2
d x
=
_
Su
P
n
(x) < m, e
n
> dS +
_
S
b
P
n
(x) < m, e
n
> dS
=
_
S
P
n
(x)(cos
n
)d D (3.285)
3.12. APPENDIX II VARIATIONAL METHOD INVOLVING PDE 151
Here we have used the denition of the unoriented integral given in (3.278) and
the proof of (3.282) is complete.
Remark 3.11.10. Assuming that G =
p
i=1
G
i
, with (int G
i
) (int G
j
) = if i ,= j
and each G
i
is a jordanian domain, simple with respect to any axis x
k
, k 1, ..., n,
then the Gauss-Ostrogradsky formula (3.282) is still valid.
3.12 Appendix II Variational Method Involving PDE
3.12.1 Introduction
A variational method uses multiple integrals and their extremum values for deriving
some PDE as rst order necessary conditions. Consider a functional
J(z) =
_
Dm
L(x, z(x),
x
z(x))dx, D
m
=
m
i=1
[a
i
, b
i
] (3.286)
where L(x, z, u) : V R R
n
R, V (open) D
m
is a rst order continuously
dierentiable function. We are looking for a continuously dierentiable function z(x) :
V R z (
1
(V ) such that
minJ(z) = J( z) z / (3.287)
where / (
1
(V ) is the admissible set of functions satisfying the following boundary
conditions
_
_
_
z(a
1
, x
2
, ..., x
m
) = z
1
0
(x
2
, ..., x
m
) , (x
2
, ..., x
m
)
m
i=1
[a
i
, b
i
]
z(b
1
, x
2
, ..., x
m
) = z
1
1
(x
2
, ..., x
m
)
.
.
.
_
z(x
1
, ..., x
m1
, a
m
) = z
m
0
(x
1
, ..., x
m1
) , (x
1
, ..., x
m1
)
m1
i=1
[a
i
, b
i
]
z(x
1
, ..., x
m1
, b
m
) = z
m
1
(x
1
, ..., x
m1
)
(3.288)
Here the functions z
j
i
, i 0, 1, j 1, ..., m, describing boundary conditions,are
some given continuous functions. This problem belongs to the classical calculus of
variations which has a long tradition with signicant contributions of Euler(1739)and
Lagrange(1736). The admissible class / (
1
(V ) is too restrictive and the exis-
tence of an optimal solution z is under question even if we assume additional
regularity conditions on the Lagrange function L. A more appropriate class of admis-
sible function is dened as follows. Denote D
m
=
m
the boundary of the domain
D
m
=
m1
i=1
[a
i
, b
i
] and let L
2
(D
m
; R
m
) be Hilbert space of measurable functions
p(x) : D
m
R
m
admitting a nite norm | p |= (
_
Dm
[p(x)[
2
dx)
1\2
< . Dene the
admissible class A ((V ) as follows
A = z ((D
m
) :
x
z L
2
(D
m
; R
m
), z[
m
= z
0
(3.289)
where z
0
((
m
) is xed. In addition,the Euler-Lagrange equation(rst order neces-
sary conditions)for the problem
min
zA
J(z) = J( z) (3.290)
where J is given in (3.286), and A in (3.289) can be rewritten as a second order PDE
provided
Lagrange function L(x, z, u) : V R R
m
R (3.291)
is second order continuously dierentiable and [
u
L(x, z, u)[ (
N
(1 + [u[) u
R
m
, x D
m
and [z[ N ,where (
N
> 0 is a constant for each N > 0.
3.12.2 Euler-Lagrange Equation for Distributed Parameters
Functionals
A functional of the type (3.286) is dened by a Lagrange function L containing a
multidimensional variable x D
m
(distributed parameter). Assume that L in (3.286)
fulls conditions (3.291) and let z A (dened in (3.289)) be the optimal element
satisfying (3.290)(locally), i.e there is a ball B( z, ) C(D
m
) such that
J(z) J( z) z B( z, ) A (3.292)
Denote
W
1\2
= z ((D
m
) : their exists
x
z L
2
(D
m
; R
m
) (3.293)
and dene a linear subspace Y W
1\2
Y = y W
1\2
, y[
m
= 0 (3.294)
An admissible variation of z is given by
z
(x) = z(x) + y(x) , x D

m
(3.295)
where [0, 1] and y Y . By denition z
A, [0, 1], and using (3.292) we get

the corresponding rst order necessary condition of optimality using Frechet dieren-
tial
0 = d J( z; y) = lim
0
J(z
) J( z)
, y Y (3.296)
where d J( z; y) is the Frechet dierential of J at z computed for the argument y. The
rst form of the E-L equation is deduced from (3.296) using the following subspace
Y Y
Y = spy ((D
m
) : y(x) =
m
i=1
y
i
(x
i
), y
i
D
1
0
([a
i
, b
i
]) (3.297)
Here the linear space D
1
0
([, ]) is consisting of all continuous functions which are
derivable satisfying () = () = 0 and its derivative
d
dt
, t [, ] is a piecewise
continuous function. A direct computation allows us to rewrite
0 = d J( z, y)(see (11)) for any y Y (3.298)
as follows
0 =
_
Dm
[
z
L(x; z(x);
x
z(x))y(x) +
m
i=1
ui
L(x; z(x);
x
z(x))
xi
y(x)]dx (3.299)
for any y Y , where u = (u
1
, ..., u
m
) , x = (x
1
, ..., x
m
)
Denote
_
_
1(x) =
_
x
1
a
1
zL(t1, x2, ..., xm; z(t1, x2, ..., xm); x z(t1, x2, ..., xm))dt1,
.
.
.
m(x) =
_
xm
am
zL(x1, x2, ..., , xm1tm; z(tx1, x2, ..., xm1, tm); x z(x1, x2, ..., xm1, tm))dtm
(3.300)
and integrating by parts in (3.299) we get (see
z
L =
xi
i
)
0 =
_
Dm
i=1
[
1
m
i
(x) +
ui
L(x; z(x);
x
z(x))]
xi
y(x)dx (3.301)
for any
y W
1\2
, y(x) =
m
i=1
y
i
(x
i
) , y
i
D
1
0
([a
i
, b
i
]) i 1, ..., m
where
1
(x), ...,
m
(x) are dened in (3.300). The integral equation (3.301) stands for
the rst form of the Euler-Lagrange equation associated with the variational problem
dened in (3.296). To get a pointwise form of the E-L equation (3.301) we need to
assume that
The optimal element z (
2
( D
m
) (3.302)
is second order continuously dierentiable on some open subset D
m
.
Theorem 3.12.1. (E-L) Let L(x, z, u) : D
m
R R
m
R be a second order
continuously dierentiable function and consider that the local optimal element z fulls
(3.302). Then the following pointwise E L equation
z
L(x, z(x),
x
z(x)) =
m
i=1
xi
[
ui
L(x, z(x),
x
z(x))] (3.303)
for any x D
m
, is valid and z[
m
= z
0
((
m
)
Proof. By hypothesis, the E L equation (3.301) is veried where
i
(x) and
ui
L(x, z(x),
x
z(x)) are rst order continuously dierentiable functions of x
D
m
for any i 1, ..., m. The integral in (3.301) can be rewritten as follows
m
i=1
[
1
m
i
(x) +
ui
L(x; z(x);
x
z(x))]
xi
y(x) = E
1
(x) E
2
(x) (3.304)
=
m
i=1
xi
[
1
m
i
(x) +
ui
L(x; z(x);
x
z(x))]y(x)
i=1
xi
[
1
m
i
(x) +
ui
L(x; z(x);
x
z(x))]y(x)
for any x D
m
. For each x
0
arbitrarily xed, let D
x0
be a cube centered
at x
0
and using (3.304) for
y Y , y(x) =
m
i
y
i
(x
i
), y ((D
x0
), y[
Dx
0
= 0 (3.305)
we rewrite (3.301) restricted to the cube D
x0

_
Dx
0
E
1
(x)Dx =
_
dx
0
E
2
(x)dx (3.306)
On the other hand,applying Gauss-Ostrogradsky formula to the rst integral in (3.306)
we get
_
Dx
0
E
1
(x)dx =
_
Dx
0
y(x)
m
i=1
[
1
m
i
(x)+
ui
L(x; z(x),
x
z(x))]cos
i
dS (3.307)
and using (3.305) we obtain
0 =
_
Dx
0
E
1
(x)dx =
_
dx
0
E
2
(x)dx (3.308)
for any y Y satisfying (3.305) where
E
2
(x) =
m
i=1
[
1
m
i
(x) +
ui
L(x; z(x),
x
z(x))]y(x)
=
z
L(x; z(x),
x
z(x))
+
m
i=1
ui
L(x; z(x),
x
z(x))y(x) (3.309)
Assimilating (3.308) as an equation for a linear functional on the space Y
x0
= y
((D
x0
) : y[
Dx
0
= 0
0 =
_
Dx
0
E
1
(x)dx =
_
Dx
0
h(x)y(x)dx, y Y
x0
(3.310)
a standard argument used in the scalar case can be applied here and it shows that
h(x) = 0 x D
x0
(3.311)
where
h(x) =
m
i=1
xi
[
ui
L(x; z(x),
x
z(x))]
z
L(x; z(x),
x
z(x))
In particular h(x
0
) = 0 where x
0
is arbitrarily xed and the proof is complete.
Remark 3.12.2. The equation (3.310) is contradicted if we assume that h(x) > 0.It
is acomplished by constructing an auxiliary function y
0
(x) =
2
[xx
0
[
2
on the ball
x B(x
0
, ) D
x0
which satisfy
1. y
0
(x) = 0, x
x0
= boundary of B(x
0
, )
2. y
0
(x) > 0, x int B(x
0
, )
3. h(x) > 0, x int B(x
0
, ) if > 0 is suciently small
Dene y
0
(x) = 0 for any x D
x0
B(x
0
, ) and
_
Dx
0
h(x)y
0
(x)dx > 0 contradicting
.
3.12.3 Examples of PDE Involving E-L Equation
(E
1
) Elliptic Equations
Example 3.12.1. Consider Laplace equation
z(x) =
m
i=1
2
i
z(x) = 0
on a bounded domain x D
0
m
=
m
i=1
(a
i
, b
i
), D
m
=
m
i=1
[a
i
, b
i
], associated with a Drichlet
boundary condition z D
m
= z
0
(x) where z
0
((D
m
).
Dene Dirichlet integral
D(z) =
1
2
_
Dm
[
x
z(x)[
2
dx,
x
z(x) = (
1
z(z), ...,
m
z(x)),
and notice that the corresponding Lagrange function is given by
L(x, z, u) =
1
2
[u[
2
, u R
m
If it is the case then compute
z
L = 0 and
m
i=1
xi
[
ui
L(x; z(x),
x
z(x))] = z(x)
which allows one to see that (E-L) equation (3.303) coincides with the above given
Dirichlet problem provided z(x) : x int D
m
is second order continuously dieren-
tiable
Example 3.12.2. Consider Piosson rquation z(x) = f(x0 , x
0
D
m
associated
with a boundary condition z[
Dm
= z
0
, where z
0
((D
m
).
This Dirichlet problem for Poisson equation can be deduced from (E-L) equation
(3.303)(see theorem (E-L))and in this respect associated the following functional
J(z) =
_
Dm
1 2[
x
z(x)[
2
+f(x)z(x)dx
where L(x, z, u) = 1 2[u[
2
+ f(x)z , u R
m
, z R, is the corresponding Lagrange
function.Notice that
z
L = f(x) and
m
i=1
xi
[
ui
L(x; z(x),
x
z(x))] = z(x)
allows one to write (E-L) equation (3.303) as
z(x) = f(x), x
0
D
m
z[
Dm
= z
)
(x), for z
0
((D
m
) .
Example 3.12.3. A semilinear Poisson equation z(x) = f(x), x
0
D
m
, associated
with a Dirichlet boundary condition z[
Dm
= z
)
(x), for z
0
((D
m
) can be deduced
from (E-L)equation (3.303) provided we associate the following functional
J(z) =
_
Dm
1 2[
x
z(x)[
2
+g(z(x))dx
where g(z) : R Ris a primitive of f(z) ,
dg|z|
dz
= f(z) , z R
Similarly, the standard argument used in examples 3.12.1 and 3.12.2 lead us to the
following non linear elliptic equation
z(x) = z(x)[ z(x)[
p1
+f( z(x)) , x
0
D
m
provided L(x, z, u) =
1
2
[u[
2
1
p+1
[z[
p+1
g(z) , p 1 where g(z) : R R is a
primitive of f(z). Assuming that f(z) satisfy f(0) = 0, lim
z
f(z)
|z|
p
= 0, for p = 3
we take g(z) =
1
2
[z[
2
and the corresponding (E-L) equation coincides with so called
Yang-Milles equation which is signicant in Physics.
(E
2
) Wave equation
(1) Consider (x, t) R
3
R = R
4
and a bounded interval D
4
R
4
. Associated the
following functional
J(z) =
_
D4
1 2
2
t
[
x
z(t, x)[
2
dxdt
Notice that the corresponding (E-L) equation (3.303) can be written as a wave equa-
tion
z(t, x) =
2
t
z(t, x)
x
z(t, x) = 0, (t, x)
0
D
4
(dAlembert operator)
(2) With the same notations as above we get Klein-Gordan equation(mentioned in
math.Physics equation)
z(t, x) +k
2
z(t, x) = 0 , (t, x)
0
D
4
which agrees with the following Lagrange Function
L(x, z, u) =
1
2
(u
0
)
2
i=1
(u
i
)
2
k
2
z
2
, u = (u
0
, u
1
, u
2
, u
3
)
Adding

4
z
4
+j z to the above L we get another Klein-Gordon equation
z(t, x) +k
2
z(t, x) = ( z(t, x))
3
+j, (t, x)
0
D
4
(E
3
) PDE involving mimimal-area surface
Looking for a minimal-area surface z = z(x), x D
m
satisfying
z[
Dm
= z
0
((D
m
) we associate the functional
J(z) =
_
Dm
_
1 +[
x
z(x)[
2
dx
The corresponding (E-L) equation (3.303) is div(T(z))(x) = 0 , x
0
D
4
where T(z)(x) =
x
z(x)
_
1 +[
x
z(x)[
2
(E
4
) ODE as (E-L)equation for m=1
A functional
J(y) =
_
b
a
_
1 + (y
(x))
2
dx
stands for the length of the curve y(x) : x [a, b] and the corresponding (E-L)
equation (3.303) is
_
d
dx
y
(x)
1+( y
(x))
= 0 , x (a, b)
y(a) = y
a
, y(b) = y
b
The solutions are expressed by linear y(x) = x + , x R, where , R are
determined such that the boundary conditions y(a) = y
a
, y(b) = y
b
are satised.
3.13 Appendix III Harmonic Functions;
Recovering a Harmonic Function from its Bound-
ary Values
3.13.1 Harmonic Functions
A vector eld H(x) = (H
1
(x), . . . , H
n
(x)) : V R
n
R
n
is called harmonic in a
domain V R
n
if H (
1
(V ; R
n
) and
divH(x) =
n
i=1
x
i
H
i
(x) = 0, (x
i
H
j
x
j
H
i
)(x) = 0, i, j i, . . . , n (3.312)
for any x V. In what follows we restrict ourselves to simple convex domain V and
notice that the second condition in (3.312) implies that H(x) = grad(x) =
x
(x)
of some scalar function (H has a potential) where is second order continuously
dierentiable. Under these conditions, the rst constraint in (3.312) can be viewed
as an equation for the scalar function
0 = divH(x) = div(grad)(x) =
n
i=1
2
i
(x) = (x) (3.313)
Any scalar function (x) : V R
n
R which is second order continuously dieren-
tiable and satises the Laplace equation (3.313) for x V will be called a harmonic
function on V.
3.13. APPENDIX III HARMONIC FUNCTIONS 159
3.13.2 Green Formulas
Let V R
n
be a bounded domain with a piecewise smooth boundary S = V ;
consider a continuously derivable scalar eld (x) : V R
n
. By a direct computation
we get ( = (
1
, . . . ,
n
))
divR =< , R >= < , R > + < R, >= + < , > (3.314)
Applying Gauss-Ostrigradsky formula and integrating both terms of equality we get
_
V
dx +
_
V
< , > dx =
_
V
(divR)dx
=
_
V
< m, R > dS
=
_
S
< m, R > dS
=
_
S
(D
m
)dS
which stands for
_
V
< , > dx +
_
V
dx =
_
S
(D
m
)dS (3.315)
Here D
m
=< m, > is the derivative of the scalar function in the normal
direction represented by the unitary orthogonal vector m at the surface S = V
oriented outside of V . The expression in 3.315 is the rst Green formula and by
permutation and subtracting we get the second Green formula
_
V
( )dx =
_
S
[(D
m
) (D
m
)]dS (3.316)
Theorem 3.13.1. (a) If a harmonic function h vanishes on the boundary S = V
then h(x) = 0 for any x intV
(b) If h
1
and h
2
are two harmonic functions satisfying h
1
(x) = h
2
(x), x S = V,
then h
1
(x) = h
2
(x) for all x int V.
(c) If a harmonic vector eld H(x) satises < m, H >= 0 on the boundary S = V
then H(x) = 0 for any x int V.
(d) If H
1
and H
2
are two harmonic vector elds satisfying < m, H
1
>=< m, H
2
>
on the boundary S = V then H
1
(x) = H
2
(x) for any x int V.
Proof. (a): Using the rst Green formula 3.315 for = = h and h = 0 we
get
_
V
[h[
2
dx = 0 and therefore h = gradh(x) = 0 for any x V which implies
h(x) = const, x V. Using h(x) = 0, x S = V . We conclude h(x) = 0 for any
x V.
(b): For h(x) = h
1
(x) h
2
(x) use the conclusion of (a).
(c): By hypothesis H(x) = h(x), x V, where the potential function h(x), x V, is
harmonic, h = 0. Using the rst Green formula (3.315) for = = h with = 0
and D
m
=< m, H > (x) = 0 for x S = V.. We get
_
V
[h[
2
dx =
_
V
[H(x)[
2
dx = 0 and H(x) = 0 for allx V.
(d): Follows from (c) using the same argument as in (b). The proof is complete.
Theorem 3.13.2. (a) If h(x) is harmonic on the domain V R
n
then
_
S
(D
m
h)(x)dS = 0, where D
m
h =< m, h > .
(b) Let B(y, r) V be a ball centered at y intV, and h is a harmonic function on
V R
n
. Then the arithmetic mean value on
= B(y, r) equals the value

h(y) at the center y,
h(y) =
1
[
[
_
h(x)dS.
(c) A harmonic function h(x) : R
n
R which satises lim
|x|
h(x) = 0 is vanish-
ing everywhere, h(x) = 0, for all x R
n
Proof. (a): Use (3.316) for = h, = 1.
(b): Let B(y, ) B(y, r) be another ball, < r, and denote
r
= B(y, ) the
corresponding boundaries. Dene V
r
= W Q and notice that the boundary S =
V
r
=
, where W = B(y, r), Q = B(y, ). The normal derivative D

m
=<
m, > is oriented outside of the domain V
r
and it implies
D
m
=
r
on
r
D
m
=
r
on
Take V = V
r
, = h, =
1
|xy|
n2
in the second Green formula ((3.316)). It is known
that (x), x V , is a harmonic function on V (see x ,= y) and as a consequence the
left hand side in ((3.316)) vanishes. The corresponding right hand side in ((3.316))
can be written as a dierence on
r
and
and the equation ((3.316))lead us to

_
r
[
1
r
n2
h
r
h

r
(
1
r
n2
)]dS =
_
[
1
n2
h
r
h

r
(
1
r
n2
)]dS.
Performing the elementary derivatives we get
1
r
n2
_
r
h
r
dS +
n 2
r
n1
_
r
hdS =
1
n2
_
h
r
dS +
n 2
n1
_
hdS.
The rst term in both sides of the last equality vanishes (see (a)). Let [S
1
[ be the
area of the sphere S(0, 1) R
n
and dividing by [S
1
[. We get
1
r
n1
|S1|
_
r
hdS =
1
n1
|S1|
_
hdS, where r
n1
[S
1
[ = [
r
[,
n1
[S
1
[ = [
[. Using the continuity

property of h and letting 0 from the last equality we get the conclusion (b). (c) :
Using the conclusion of (b) for r , we get conclusion (c).
3.13.3 Recovering a Harmonic Function Inside a Ball I
By Using its Boundary Values
The arguments for this conclusion are based on the second Green formula written on
a domain V = W Q, where W = B(0, r), Q = B(y, ) B(0, r). This time, we use
the following harmonic functions on V (V = S =
)
= h(x), = (x) =
1
[x y[
n2

r
n2
[y[
n2
1
[x y [
n2
(3.317)
where y =
r
2
|y|
2
y, (x) = 0, x

r
= B(0, r) and
0
(x) =
r
n2
|y|
n2
1
|xy|
n2
is
harmonic on W. The second Green formula becomes
r
h(x)
r
dS =
_
[
h
(x) h
(x)]dS (3.318)
where

stands for the derivative following the direction of the radius [y, x], x
.
A direct computation lead us to
_
_
_
[
_
(x)dS[ c
1
1
n2
c
2
n1
0 for 0
[
_
h
0(x)
dS[ c
n1
0 for 0
(3.319)
and
_
n2
ds = (n 2)
_
h
1
n1
ds =
(n 2) [ S
1
[
[
[
(3.320)
_
hds (n 2) [ S
1
[ h(y), for 0
Letting 0 from (3.318) we get
h(y) =
1
(n 2) [ S
1
[
_
h(x)
r
(x) ds (3.321)
It remains to compute
(x)
r
on x
r
and it is easily seen that see (x) = const x
r
(x) = [ grad (x) [ (3.322)
By denition, y
is taken such that

[ x y [
2
[ x y
[
2
=
r
2
2 < x, y > + [ y [
2
r
2
2 < x, y >
r
2
|y|
2
+
r
4
|y|
2
=
[ y [
2
r
2
= const (3.323)
for any x
r
and the direct computation of [ grad(x) [ shows that
[ grad (x) [=
(n 2)(r
2
[ y [
2
)
r [ x y [
n
, [ x [= r (3.324)
provided (3.323) is used. Using (3.322) and (3.324) int (3.321) we get the following
Poisson formula
h(y) =
r
2
[ y [
2
[ S
1
[ r
_
h(x)
[ x y [
n
ds =
_
P(x, y) h(x) ds, (3.325)

where Poisson kernel
P(x, y) =
r
2
[ y [
2
[ S
1
[ r
1
[ x y [
n
> 0 for any y B(0, r) (3.326)
Theorem 3.13.3. Let (x) : R
n
Rbe a continuous function where = W is
the boundary of a xed ball W R
n
. Then there exists a unique continuous function
h(y) : W Rwhich is harmonic for y int W and coincides with(x) on the
boundary .
Proof. Let r > 0 be the radius of the ballW and for any y int W dene h(y) as
follows.
h(y) =
_
P(x, y)(x)ds (3.327)

where P(x, y) =
r
2
|y|
2
|S1|r
1
|xy|
n
is the Poisson kernel (see(3.326)) We know that both
(y) =
1
|xy|
n2
, y int W and its derivatives
(y)
yi
, y intW, i 1, 2 . . . , n are
harmonic function. As a consequence the following linear combination
(y)
2
n 2
n
i=1
x
i
(y)
y
i
=
1
[ x y [
n2
+ 2
n
i=1
x
i
(y
i
x
i
)
[ x y [
n
=
1
[ x y [
n
(
n
i=1
(x
i
y
i
)
2
+ 2
n
i=1
x
i
y
i
2
n
i=1
x
2
i
)
=
1
[ x y [
n
n
i=1
(y
2
i
x
2
i
)
=
[ y
2
[ r
2
[ x y [
n
= [ S
i
[ P(x, y) (3.328)
is a harmonic function. In conclusion, h(y), y int W, dened in ((3.327)is a har-
monic function. On the other hand, for a sequence y
m
m1
intW, lim
m
y
m
=
0
. We get
_
P(x, y
m
)dS = 1(see(3.325), forh 1) (3.329)
lim
m
_
P(x, y
m
)dS = 0, where
= B(x
0
, ) , > 0, (3.330)
and [ x y
m
[ c > 0, m 1, are used.
Using (3.329) and (3.330) we see easily that
lim
m
_
P(x, y
m
)(x)ds = (x
0
) (3.331)
and h(y) : y W is a continuous function satisfying
h(x) = (x), x
(3.332)
h(y) = 0, (forall)y intW (3.333)
A continuous function satisfying (3.332) and (3.333) is unique provided the maximum
principle for laplace equation is used.
3.13.4 Recovering a Harmonic Function Inside a Ball II
By Using its Normal Derivative on the Boundary
Let h(y) : W R
n
R be a harmonic function and W = B(z, r) R
n
is a ball.
Then
(y) =
n
i=1
y
i
h(y)
y
i
and
h(y)
y
i
, i 1, 2, ...., n (3.334)
are harmonic functions on the ball W;
(x) =
h(x)
, for any x in = W (3.335)

where
h(x)
is the normal derivative of h on . The property (3.334) is obtained

by a direct computation the property (3.335) uses the following argument. Without
restricting generality, take z = 0, r = 1, and for y = .x, [x[ = 1, 0 1, rewrite
h(y) in (3.334) as follows
Theorem 3.13.4. Let (x) :
R
n
R be a continuous function satisfying
_
(x)dS = 0, where
= W is the boundary of a ball W = B(z, r) R

n
.Then
there exists a continuous function h(y) : W R which is harmonic on y intW
and admitting the normal derivative
h(x)
(x
, 0 < 1) which equals (x) for

= 1. Any other function with these properties veries
(y) h(y) = const () y W. (3.336)
Proof. The existence of a function h uses the Poisson kernel P(x, y) given in (3.10),
(y) =
_
P(x, y)(x)dS. (3.337)

Using (3.16, 3.17) we know that the function (y), y W is continuous and
_
(x) = (x), x
(y) = 0, y in int W (varphi is harmonic on int W)

(3.338)
In addition, using
_
(x)dS = 0 we get
(0) =
_
(x)dS = 0 (3.339)
Dene
h(y) = h(x) =
_

0
(x)
d +h(0) (3.340)
where (y) is continuously derivable at y = 0, (0) = 0 and h(0) = const (arbitrarily
xed). We shall show that h(y) : W R is a continuous function satisfying
h(y) = 0, y int W (h is harmonic in int W) (3.341)
h(x)
=1
=
h(x)
= (x) = (x), x
(3.342)
For simplicity, take h(0) = 0, and using (3.340) for = 1 we compute
_
P(s, y)h(s)dS =
_
P(s, y)
_
_
1
0
(s)
d
_
dS
_
1
0
__
P(s, y)
(s)
dS
_
d (3.343)
By the denition
(s)
, [0, 1] xed, is a harmonic function satisfying (3.338) and

(3.343) is rewritten as
_
P(s, y)h(s)dS =
_
1
0
(s)
d =
_

0
(x)
d = h(y). (3.344)
where
_
(y)
, [0, 1]
_
_
(y)
, [0, ]
_
(3.345)
and = are used. The equation (3.344) stands for (3.341) and (3.342) is obtained
from (3.340) by a direct derivation.
Mainly, it was written using the references [5] and [10]. The last section 3.9 follows
the same presentation as in the reference [12]. In the appendices are are used the
presentation contained in the references [4] and [9].
Chapter 4
Stochastic Dierential
Equations; Approximation
and Stochastic Rule of
Derivations
4.1 Properties of continuous semimartingales and
stochastic integrals
Let a complete probability space , F, P be given. Assume that a family of sub
-elds F
t
F, t [0, T], is given such that the following properties are fullled:
i) Each F
t
contains all null sets of F.
ii) (F
t
) is increasing, i.e. F
t
F
s
if t s.
iii) (F
t
) is right continuous, i.e.
>0
F
t+
= F
t
for any t < T. Let X(t), t [0, T]
be a measurable stochastic process with values in R. We will assume, unless other-
wise mentioned, that it is F
t
-adapted, i.e., X(t) is F
t
-measurable for any t [0, T].
The process X(t) is called continuous if X(t; ) is a continuous function of t for
almost all . Let L
c
be the linear space consisting of all continuous stochas-
tic processes. We introduce the metric by [X Y [ = (X, Y ) = (E[sup
t
[X(t)
167
168 CHAPTER 4. STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Y (t)[
2
/(1 + sup
t
[X(t) Y (t)[
2
])
1/2
. It is equivalent to the topology of the uniform
convergence in probability. A sequence X
n
of L
c
is a Cauchy sequence i for any
> 0, P(sup
t
[X
n
(t) X
m
(t)[ > ) 0 if n, m . Obviously L
c
is a complete
metric space. We introduce the norm [[ [[ by [[X[[ = (E[sup
t
[X(t)[
2
])
1/2
and denote
by L
2
c
the set of all elements in L
c
with nite norms. We may say that the topology
of L
2
c
is the uniform convergence in L
2
. Since (X, 0) [[X[[, the topology by [[ [[ is
stronger than that by and it is easy to see that L
2
c
is a dense subset of L
c
.
Denition 4.1.1. Let X(t), t [0, T], be a continuous F
t
-adapted process. (i) It is
called a martingale if E[X(t)[ < for any t and satises E[X(t)/F
s
] = X(s) for
any t > s.
(ii) It is called a local martingale if there exists an increasing sequence of stopping
times (T
n
) such that T
n
T and each stopped process X
Tn
(t)
X(tT
n
) is a martingale
(iii) It is called an increasing process if X(t; ) is an increasing function of t almost
surely (a.s.) with respect to , i.e. there is a P-null set N such that X(t, ),
t [0, T] is an increasing function for any N.
(iv) It is called a process of bounded variation if it is written as the dierence of
two increasing processes.
(v) It is called a semi-martingale if it is written as the sum of a local martingale
and a process of bounded variation.
We will quote two classical results of Doob concerning martingales without giving
proofs.(see A. Friedmann)
Theorem 4.1.2. Let X(t), t [0, T] be a martingale.
(i) Optional sampling theorem. Let S and | be stopping times with values
in [0, T]. Then X(S) is integrable and satises E[X(S)/F(|)] = X(S |), where
F(|) = A F
T
: A | t F(t) for any t [0, T]
(ii) Inequality. Suppose E[X(T)[
p
< with p > 1. Then
E sup
t
[X(t)[
p
q
p
E[X(T)[
p
where
1
p
+
1
q
= 1
Remark 4.1.3. Let S be a stopping time. If X(t) is a martingale the stopped process
X
S
(t) X(t S) is also a martingale. In fact, by Doobs optional sampling theorem
4.1. PROPERTIES OF CONTINUOUS SEMIMARTINGALES 169
we have (for t s) E[X
S
(t)[F(s)] = X(t S s) = X(S s) = X
S
(s). Similarly,
if X is a local martingale the stopped process X
S
is a local martingale. Let X be
a local martingale. Then there is an increasing sequence of stopping times S
k
T
such that each stopped process X
S
k
is a bounded martingale. In fact, dene S
k
by
S
k
= inf t > 0 : [X(t)[ k(= T if = ). Then S
k
T and it holds
sup
t
[X
S
k
(t)[ k, so that each X
S
k
is a bounded martingale.
Remark 4.1.4. Let M
c
be the set of all square integrable martingale, X(t) with
X(0) = 0. Because of Doobs inequality the norm [[X[[ is nite for any X M
c
.
Hence M
c
is a subset of L
2
c
. We denote M
loc
c
the set of all continuous local martingales
X(t) such that X(0) = 0 ; it is a subset of L
c
.
Theorem 4.1.5. M
c
is a closed subspace of L
2
c
M
loc
c
is a closed subspace of L
c
.
Further more, M
c
is dense in M
loc
c
.
Remark 4.1.6. Denote by H
2
t
the set consisting of all random variables h :
R which are F
t
-measurable and E[h[
2
< . Then for each X L
2
c
there holds
E[X(T)/F
t
] =
h where

h H
2
t
is the optional solution for
min
hH
2
t
E[X(T) h[
2
= E[X(T)
h[
2
Denition Let X(t) be a continuous stochastic process and a partition of the
interval [0, T] : = 0 = t
0
< . . . < t
n
= T, and let [[ = max(t
i+1
t
i
). Associated
with the partition , we dene a continuous process X
(t) as
X
(t) =
k1
i=0
(X(t
i+1
X(t
i
))
2
+ (X(t) X(t
k
))
2
where k is the number such that t
k
t < t
k+1
. We call it the quadratic variation of
X(t) associated with the partition Now let
m
be a sequence of partitions such
that [
m
[ 0. If the limit of X
m
(t) exists in probability and it is independent
of the choice of sequence
m
a.s., it is called the quadratic variation of X(t) and
is denoted by X(t). We will see that a natural class of processes where quadratic
variations are well dened is that of continuous semimartingales.
Lemma 4.1.7. Let X be a continuous process of bounded variation. Then the
quadratic variation exists and it equals zero a.s.
Proof. Let [X[(t; ) be the total variation of the function X(s, ), 0 s t. Then
there holds
[X[(t) = sup
[[X(t
0
)[ +
k1
j=0
[X(t
j+1
) X(t
j
)[ +[X(t) X(t
k
)[]
and X
(t)
_
k1
j=0
[X(t
j+1
) X(t
j
)[ +[X(t) X(t
k
)[
_
max
i
[X(t
i+1
) X(t
i
)[
[X[(t) max
i
[X(t
i+1
) X(t
i
)[
The right hand side converges to 0 for [[ 0 a.s.
Theorem 4.1.8. Let M(t) t [0, T], be a bounded continuous martingale. Let
n
be a sequence of partitions such that [

n
[ 0. Then M
n
(t), t [0, T], converges
uniformly to a continuous increasing process M(t) in L
2
sense, i.e.,
lim
n
E[sup
t
[M
n
(t) M(t)[
2
] = 0;
in addition M
2
(t) M(t), t [0, T] is a martingale.
The proof is based on the following two lemmas.
Lemma 4.1.9. For any t > s, there holds,
E[M
(t)/F(s)] M
(s) = E[(M(t) M(s))

2
[F(s)]
In particular, M
2
(t) M
(t) is a continuous martingale.

Hint. Rewrite M(t) and M(s) as follows (s < t)
M(t) = M(t) M(t
k
) +
k1
i=0
[M(t
i+1
M(t
i
)] +M(0), where t
k
t < t
k+1
M(s) = M(s) M(s
l
) +
l1
i=0
[M(s
i+1
) M(s
i
)] +M(0), where s
l
s < s
l+1
and [0, s] = 0 = s
0
< s
1
< . . . < s
l
. On the other hand
E[(M(t) M(s))
2
/F(s)] = E[(M(t) M(t
k
))
2
+
k1
i=l+1
(M(t
i+1
) M(t
i
))
2
+ (M(s
l+1
) M(s))
2
/F(s)] (4.1)
where t
l+1
= s
l+1
and
E[(M(t
i+1
) M(t
i
))(M(t
j+1
) M(t
j
)]/F(s)]
= EE[(M(t
i+1
) M(t
i
)](M(t
j+1
) M(t
j
))/F(t
j+1
)]/F(s) = 0 (ifi > j) (4.2)
are used. Adding and subtracting M
(s) = M(s) M(s

l
))
2
+
l1
i=0
(M(s
i+1
)
M(s
i
))
2
we get the rst conclusion which can be written as a martingale property.
Lemma 4.1.10. It holds
lim
n,m
E[[M
n
(T) M
m
(T)[
2
] = 0.
4.1. PROPERTIES OF CONTINUOUS SEMIMARTINGALES 171
Theorem 4.1.11. M(t) be a continuous local martingale. Then there is a contin-
uous increasing process M(t) such that M
(t) converges uniformly to M(t) in

probability.
Corollary 4.1.12. M
2
(t) M(t) is a local martingale if M(t) is a continuous local
martingale.
Theorem 4.1.13. Let X(t) be a continuous semi-martingale. Then X
(t) con-
verges, uniformly to M(t) in probability as [[ 0, where M(t) is the local mar-
tingale part of X(t)
Stochastic integrals Let M(t) be a continuous local martingale and let f(t) be a
continuous F(t) adapted process. We will dene the stochastic integral of f(t) by the
dierential dM(t) using the properties of martingales, especially those of quadratic
variations. Let = (0 = t
0
< . . . < t
n
= T) be a partition of [0, T]. For any t [0, T]
choose t
k
of such that t
k
t < t
k+1
and dene
L
(t) =
k1
i=0
f(t
i
)(M(t
i+1
) M(t
i
)) +f(t
k
))(M(t) M(t
k
)) (4.3)
It is easily seen that L
(t) is a continuous local martingale. The quadratic variation

is computed directly as
L
(t) =
k1
i=0
f
2
(t
i
)(M(t
i+1
)
M(t
i
)) +f
2
(t
k
)(M(t) M(t
k
))
_
t
0
[f
(s)[
2
dM(s) (4.4)
where f
(s) is a step process dened from f(s) by f
(s) = f(t
k
) if t
k
s < t
k+1
.
Let
be another partition of [0, T]. We dene L
(t) similarly, using the same f(s)

and M(s). Then there holds
L
(t) =
_
t
0
[f
(s)
f
(s)
[
2
dM(s).
Now let
n
be a sequence of partitions of [0, T] such that [
n
[ 0. Then L
n
L
m
(T) converges to 0 in probability as n, m . Hence L
n
is a Cauchy
sequence in M
loc
c
. We denote the limit as L(t).
Denition 4.1.14. The above L(t) is called the Ito integral of f(t) by dM(t) and is
denoted by L(t) =
_
t
0
f(s)dM(s).
Denition 4.1.15. Let X(t) be a continuous semimartingale decomposed to the sum
of a continuous local martingale M(t) and a continuous process of bounded variation
A(t)
Let f be an F(t)-adapted process such that f L
2
(M) and
_
T
0
[f(s)[d[A[(s). Then the Ito integral of f(t) by dX(t) is dened as
_
t
0
f(s)dX(s) =
_
t
0
f(s)dM(s) +
_
t
0
f(s)dA(s)
Remark 4.1.16. If f is a continuous semimartingale then
_
t
0
f(s)dX(s) exists. We
will dene another stochastic integral by the dierential dX (s) s [0, t]
_
t
0
f(s)
dX(s) = lim
||0
_
k1
i=0
1
2
(f(t
i+1
) +f(t
i
))(X(t
i+1
) X(t
i
))
+
1
2
(f(t) +f(t
k
))(X(t) X(t
k
))
_
Denition 4.1.17. If the above limit exists, it is called the Fisk-Stratonovich integral
of f(s) by dX(s).
Remark 4.1.18. If f is a continuous semimartingale, the Fisk-Stratonovitch integral
is well dened and satises
_
t
0
f(s) dX(s) =
_
t
0
f(s)dX(s) +
1
2
f, X(t)
Proof. Is easily seen from the relation
k1
i=0
1
2
(f(t
i+1
) +f(t
i
))(X(t
i+1
) X(t
i
)) +
1
2
(f(t) +f(t
k
))(X(t) X(t
k
))
=
k1
i=0
f(t
i
)(X(t
i+1
) X(t
i
)) + f(t
k
)(X(t) X(t
k
)) +
1
2
f, X
(t) (4.5)
where the joint quadratic variation
f, X
(t) =
k1
i=0
(f(t
i+1
f(t
i
))(X(t
i+1
X(t
i
)) + (f(t) f(t
k
))(X(t) X(t
k
))
and k is the number such that t
k
t < t
k+1
.
Theorem 4.1.19. Let X and Y be continuous semi-martingales. The joint quadratic
variation associated with the partition is dened as before and is written X, Y
.
Then X, Y
converges uniformly in probability to a continuous process of bounded

4.2. APPROXIMATIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATIONS 173
variation X, Y (t). If M and N are local martingale parts of X and Y , respectively,
then X, Y coincides with M, N
Remark 4.1.20. Let w(t) = (w
1
(t), . . . , w
m
(t)) be an m-dimensional (F
(t)
)-adapted
continuous stochastic process. It is an (F
(t)
)-Wiener process i each w
i
(t) is a scalar
Wiener process with the joint quadratic variation fullling w
i
, w
j
(t) =
ij
t where
ii = 1 and
y
= 0 i ,= j
4.2 Approximations of the diusion equations by
smooth ordinary dierential equations
The m-dimensional Wiener process is approximated by a smooth process and it allows
one to use non anticipative smooth solutions of ordinary dierential equations as ap-
proximations for solutions of a diusion equation. It comes from Langevins classical
procedure of dening a stochastic dierential equation. By a standard m-dimensional
Wiener process we mean a measurable function w(t, ) R
m
, (t; ) [0, )
with continuous trajectories w(t, ) for each such that w(0, ) = 0, and i
1
)
E(w(
2
)) w(t
1
)/F
t1
) = 0, i
2
) E([w(t
2
) w(t
1
)][w(t
2
) w(t
1
)]
T
/T
t1
) = I
m
(t
2
t
1
)
for any 0 t
1
< t
2
, where (, T, P) is a given complete probability space and F
t
F
is the -algebra generated by (w(s), s t). The quoted Langevin procedure replaces
a standard m-dimensional Wiener process by a C
1
non-anticipative process v
(t) (see
v
(t) is F
t
measurable) as follows
v
(t) = w(t)
_
t
0
(exp (t s))dw(s), =
1
, 0 (4.6)
where the integral in the right hand side is computed as
w(t)
_
t
0
w(s)(exp (t s))ds (the integration by parts formula) (4.7)
Actually, v
(t), t [0, T], is the solution of the following equations

dv
(t)
dt
= v
(t) +w(t) = (w(t) v
(t), v
(0) = 0 (4.8)
and by a direct computation we obtain
E[[v
(t) w(t)[[
2
, t [0, T] (4.9)
Rewrite v
(t) in (4.6) as
v
(t) = w(t)
(t),
where
(t) =
_
t
0
exp (t s)dw(s) (4.10)
fullls d
i
=
i
dt +dw
i
(t), i = 1, . . . , m, and
dv
dt
(t) =
(t), =
1
, 0. (4.11)
Now, we are given continuous functions
f(t, x), g
j
(t, x) : [0, T] R
n
R
n
, j = 1, . . . , m,
such that
()
_
i) f, g
j
are bounded, j = 1, . . . , m
ii) [[h(t, x
) h(t, x
[[ L[[x
[[ ()x
, x
R
n
, t [0, T]
where L > 0 is a constant,h f, g
j
. In addition, we assume that (g
j
C
1,2
b
([0, T]
R
n
)
)
dgj
t
,
dgj
x
,
d
2
gj
tx
,
d
2
gj
x
2
, j = 1, . . . , m, are continuous and bounded functions. Let
x
0
(t) and x
(t), t [0, T], be the solution in

dx = [f(t, x) +
1
2
m
i=1
g
i
x
(t, x)g
i
(t, x)]dt (4.12)
+
m
i=1
g
i
(t, x)dw
i
(t)
, x(0) = x
0
and
dx
dt
= f(t, x) +
m
i=1
g
i
(t, x)
dv
i
(t)
dt
, x(0) = x
0
(4.13)
correspondingly, where v
(t) is associated with w(t) in (4.6) and fullls (4.8)-(4.11).

It is the Fisk-Stratonovich integral (see below) which allow one to rewrite the
system (4.12) as
dx = f(t, x)dt +
m
i=1
g
i
(t, x) dw
i
(t), x(0) = x
0
, (4.14)
where
g
i
(t, x) dw
i
(t)
def
= g
i
(t, x)dw
i
(t) +
1
2
g
i
x
(t, x)g
i
(tx)dt
Theorem 4.2.1. Assume that continuous functions f(t, x), g
i
(t, x), t [0, T], x R
n
,
are given such that () and () are fullled. Then lim
0
E[[x
(t) x
0
(t)[[
2
= 0, t
[0, T], where x
0
(t) and x
(t) are the solutions dened in (4.12) and, respectively,(4.13)

Proof. Using (4.12) we rewrite the solution x
(t) as
x
(t) = x
0
+
_
t
0
f(s), x
(s))ds +
m
i=1
_
t
0
(s)g
i
(s, x
(s))ds, t [0, T] (4.15)

and from F
t
-measurability of
(t) we obtain that x
(t) is T
t
-measurable and non-
anticipative with respect to T
t
, t [0, T]. Therefore, the stochastic integrals
_
t
0
g
i
(s, x
(s))dw
i
(s) and
_
t
0
g
i
(s, x
(s))d
i
(s) are well dened, and using (4.10) we

obtain
_
t
0
g
i
(s, x
(s))d
i
(s) =
_
t
0
g
i
(s, x
(s))
i
(s)ds +
_
t
0
g
i
(s, x
(s, x
(s))dw
i
(s).
(4.16)
Step 1
Using (4.15)in(4.15) there follows
x
(t) = x
0
+
_
t
0
f(s, x
(s))ds +
m
i=1
_
t
0
g
i
(s, x
(s))dw
i
(s)
i=1
_
t
0
g
i
(s
s
, x
(s))d
i
(s), t [0, T] (4.17)

In what follows it will be proved that (see step 2 and step 3)
_
t
0
g
i
(s, x
(s))d
i
(s) =
1
2
_
t
0
g
i
x
(s, x
(s))g
i
(s, x
(s))ds +O
t
() (4.18)
where E[[O
t
()[[
2
c
1
, () t [0, T], for some constant c
1
> 0. Using (4.18) in
(4.17) we rewrite (4.17) as
x
(t) = x
0
+
_
t
0
_
f(s, x
(s))
+
1
2
m
i=1
g
i
x
(s, x
(s))g
i
(s, x
(s))
_
ds
m
i=1
_
t
0
g
i
(s, x
(s))dw
i
(s) +O
t
(), (4.19)
where E[O
t
()[[
2
c
1
.
The hypotheses () and () allow one to check that
f(t, x) f(t, x) +
1
2
m
i=1
g
i
x
(t, x)g
i
(t, x)
and g
i
(t, x) full () also but with a new Lipschitz constant

L.
The proof will be complete noticing that
E[[x
(t) x
0
(t)[[
2
c
2
_
t
0
E[[x
(s) x
0
(s)[[
2
ds +c
3
, t [0, T] (4.20)
for some constants c
2
, c
3
> 0 and Gronwalls lemma applied to (4.20) implies
E[[x
(t) x
0
(t)[[
2
c
3
(expT
c2
) = c
4
(4.21)
which proves the conclusion.
Step 2
To obtain (4.18) fullled we use an ordinary calculus as integration by parts formula
(see x
(t) is a C
1
function in t [0, T]). More precisely
_
t
0
g
i
(s, x
(s))d
i
(s) = g
i
(t, x
(t)
i
(t) +
_
t
0
(s)
_
d
ds
g
i
(s, x
(s))
_
ds
=
m
j=1
_
t
0
g
i
x
(s, x
(s))g
j
(s, x
(s))
dv
j
(s)
ds

i
(s)ds
+ O
i
t
()
m
j=1
T
ij
(t) +O
i
t
(), (4.22)
Here
T
ij
(t)
_
t
0
g
i
x
(s, x
(s))g
j
(s, x
(s))
dv
j
(s)
ds

i
(s)ds and
O
i
t
()
_
t
0
(s)
_
g
i
s
(s, x
(s)) +
g
i
x
(s, x
(s))f(s, x
(s))
_
ds
g
i
(t, x
(t))
i
(t)
satises
E[[O
1
t
()[[
2
k, t [0, T], (4.23)
(see E[[
i
(t)[[
2
in (4.10) and f, g
i
,
g
i
x
;
g
i
t
are bounded). On the other hand,
dv
j
dt
=
j
(t) (see (4.11)) and using

j
(t)dt = dw
j
(t) d
j
(t) (see (4.10)) we obtain

that T
ij
in (4.22) fulls
T
ij
(t) =
_
t
0
g
ij
(s, x
(s))
i
(s)d
j
(s) +
2
t
(), (4.24)
where g
ij
(t, x)
g
i
x
(t, x)g
j
(t, x) and
2
t
()
_
t
0
g
ij
(s, x
(s))
i
(s)dw
j
(s)
satises
E[[
2
t
()[[
2
k
2
, t [0, T] (4.25)
(see g
ij
bounded and E[[
i
(t)[[
2
).
Step 3
(a) For i = j we use formulas
(t) = (exp t)
i
(t),
i
(t) =
_
t
0
(exps)dw
i
(s)
(
i
(t))
2
= (exp 2t)(
i
(t))
2
= (exp 2t)
_
_
t
0
2(exp2s)
i
(s)dw
i
(s) +
_
t
0
(exp2s)ds
_
= 2
_
t
0
(s)d
i
(s) +
_
t
0
ds
T
ii
(t) =
_
t
0
g
ii
(s, x
(s))
i
(s)d
i
(s) +
2
t
() (see (4.24))
We get
T
ii
(t) =
1
2
_
t
0
g
ii
(s, x
(s))ds
1
2
_
t
0
g
ii
(s, x
)d(
i
(t))
2
+
2
t
()
=
1
2
_
t
0
g
ii
(s, x
(s))ds
1
2
g
ii
(t, x
(t))(
i
(t))
2
+
1
2
_
t
0
_
d
ds
g
ii
(s, x
(s))
_
(
i
(s))
2
ds +
2
t
()
=
1
2
_
t
0
g
ii
(s, x
(s))ds +O
2
t
(). (4.26)
Here
O
2
t
()
2
t
()
1
2
g
ii
(t, x
(t))(
i
(t))
2
+
1
2
_
t
0
_

s
g
ii
(s, x
(s)) +
g
ii
x
(s, x
(s))f(s, x
(s))
+
m
j=1
g
ii
x
(s, x
(s))g
j
(s, x
(s))
j
(s)
_
(
i
(s))
2
ds
fulls E[[O
2
t
()[[
2

K
2
taking into account that
E[[
2
t
()[[
2
k
2
(see (4.24)), E(
i
(t))
2
= (exp 2t)E(
i
(t))
2
(4.27)
In addition, write (
i
(t))
2
= (exp 2t)(
i
(t))
2
, where (
i
(t))
2
= a
i
(t) + b(t) is the
corresponding decomposition using martingale a
i
(t)
_
t
0
2
i
(s)(exps)dw
i
(s) and
b(t)
_
t
0
(exp2s)ds. Compute (
i
(t))
4
= (exp 4t)[a
i
(t))
2
+ (b(t))
2
+ 2a
i
(t)b(t)]
and (
i
(t))
6
= (exp 6t)[(a
i
(t))
3
+ (b(t))
3
+ 3(a
i
(t))
2
b(t) + 3a
i
(t)(b(t))
2
]. Noticing
that a
i
(t), t [0, T], is a martingale with a
i
(0) = 0 we can prove (exercise!) that any
(a
i
(t))
m
(m = 2, 3) satises
E(a
i
(t))
m
=
1
2
_
t
0
m(m1) E[a
i
(s))
m2
(f
i
(s))
2
]ds
where f
i
(t) 2(expt)
i
(t) and a
i
(t)
_
t
0
f
i
(s)dw
i
(s). We get
E(
i
(t))
4
(const)
2
, E(
i
(t))
6
(const)
3
t [0, T] (4.28)
and the conclusion E[[
2
t
()[[
2
(const) used in (4.26) follows directly from (4.27)
and (4.28).
(b) For any i ,= j, there holds
T
ij
(t) =
_
t
0
g
ij
(s, x
(s))
i
(s)d
j
(s) +
2
t
() (see (17))
where
d
j
(s) =
j
(s)ds +dw
j
(s) (see (4.10)) (4.29)
Using (4.29) in (4.24) for i ,= j we obtain that
i
(t),
j
(t) are independent random

variables and
T
ij
(t) =
1
2
_
t
0
g
ij
(s, x
(s))d[
i
(s)
j
(s)] +
t
() +

O
t
(), (4.30)
where
O
t
() =
_
t
0
g
ij
(s, x
(s))
i
(s)dw
j
(s)
satises
E[[
O
t
()[[
2
(const) (see g
ij
is bounded andE(
i
(s))
2
) (4.31)
Integrating by parts the rst term in (4.30) and using
E(
i
(t))
2
(
j
(t))
2
(const)
2
, E(
i
(t))
2
(
j
(t))
2
(
k
(t))
2
(const)
3
(4.32)
we nally obtain
T
ij
(t) =

O
2
t
()with E[[
O
2
t
()[[
2

C, t [0, T] (4.33)
Using (4.26), (4.33) in (4.22) we nd (4.18) fullled. The proof is complete
Remark 4.2.2. Under the conditions in theorem (4.2.1) it might be useful to notice
that the computations remain unchanged if a stopping time : [0, T], :
t T
t
, ()t [0, T], is used. Namely
lim
0
E[[x
(t ) x
0
(t )[[
2
= 0 () t [0, T],
if the random varieble : [0, T] is adapted to T
t
i.e. : t T
t
for
t [0, T].
Proof. By denition
x
(t ) = x
0
+
_
t
0
f(s, x
(s))ds +
m
j=1
_
t
0
g
j
(s, x
(s)
dv
j
ds
(s),
x
0
(t ) = x
0
+
_
t
0
f(t, x
0
(s))ds +
m
j=1
_
t
0
g
j
(s, x
0
(s)dw
j
(s), t [0, T],
where
f(t, x) f(t, x) +
1
2
m
j=1
g
j
x
(t, x)g
j
(t, x).
Using the characteristic function
(t, ) =
_
1 if () t
0 if () < t
which is a non-anticipative function, we rewrite y
(t) x
(t ) and y
0
(t)
0
(t )
as
() y
(t) = x
0
+
_
t
0
(s)f(s, y
(s)ds +
m
j=1
_
t
0
(s)g
j
(s, y
(s)
dv
j
(s)
ds
,
() y
0
(t) = x
0
+
_
t
0
(s)
f(s, y
0
(s))ds +
m
j=1
_
t
0
(s)g
j
(s, y
0
(s))dw
j
(s).
Now the computations in Theorem 4.2.1 repeated for (*) and (**) allow one to obtain
the conclusion.
Remark 4.2.3. Using Remark 1 we may remove the boundedness assumption of f, g
j
in the hypothesis () of Theorem 4.2.1. That is to say, the solutions x
(t), x
0
(t), t
[0, T], exist assuming only the hypothesis (, (ii)) and (), and to obtain the conclusion
we multiply f, g
j
by a C
scalar function 0
N
(x) 1 such that
N
(x) = 1 if
x S
N
(x
0
) ,
N
(x) = 0 if x R
n
S
2N
(x
0
) where S
(x
0
) R
n
is the ball of radius
and centered at x
0
. We obtain new bounded functions
f
N
(t, x) = f(t, x)
N
(x), g
N
j
(t, x) = g
j
(t, x)
N
(x)
fullling () and () of Theorem 4.2.1, and therefore lim
0
E[[x
N
(t) x
N
0
(t)[[
2
= 0
() t [0, T], where x
N
(t) and x
N
0
(t) are the corresponding solutions. On the other
hand, using a stopping time (exit ball time)
N
() = inft 0 : x
0
(t, ) , S
N
(x
0
)
we obtain x
0
(t
N
) = x
N
0
(t
N
), t [0, T] (see Friedmann) where x
0
(t), t [0, T]
is the solution of the equation (4.12) with f, g
i
fullling (, ii) and ().
Finally we obtain:
c) lim
0
E[[x
N
(t
N
) x
0
(t
N
)[[
2
= 0
for any t [0, T], and for arbitrarily xed N > 0. The conclusion (c) represents the
approximation of the solution in (4.12) under the hypotheses (, ii) and ().
Remark 4.2.4. The nonanticipative process v
(t), t [0, T], used in Theorem 4.2.1

is only of the class C
1
with respect to t [0, T], but a minor change in the approxi-
mating equations as follows ( =
1
, 0)
dv
dt
(t) = y
1
,
dy
1
dt
= y
1
+y
2
, . . . ,
dy
k1
dt
= y
k1
+y
k
dy
k
= y
k
dt +dw(t), t [0, T], y
j
(0) = 0, j = 1, . . . k, v
(0) = 0
will allow one to obtain a non-anticipative v
(t), t [0, T] of the class C

k
, for an
arbitrarily xed k.
4.3 Stochastic rule of derivation
The results contained in Theorem 4.2.1 and in remarks following the theorem give the
possibility to obtain, in a straight manner, the standard rule of stochastic derivation
associated with stochastic dierential equations ( SDE.) (6
s
) when the drift vector
eld f(t, x) R
n
and diusion vector elds g
j
(t, x) R
n
, j 1, . . . , m are not
bounded with respect to (t, x) [0, T] R
n
. More precisely, we are given continuous
functions
4.3. STOCHASTIC RULE OF DERIVATION 181
f(t, x), g
j
(t, x) : [0, T] R
n
R
n
, j = 1, . . . , m
such that
(1) [[h(t, x
) h(t, x
)[[ L[[x
[[, for any x
, x
R
n
, t [0, T] where L > 0 is
a constant and h stands for f or g
j
, j 1, . . . , m
(2) g
j
C
1,2
b
([0, T] R
n
) i.e.
t
g
j
,
x
g
j
,
2
tx
g
j
and
2
x
2
g
j
, j 1, . . . , m are con-
tinuous and bounded functions
Consider the following system of SDE
(3) dx = f(t, x)dt +
m
j=1
g
j
(t, x) dw
j
(t), x(0) = x
0
, t [0, T] where Fisk-Stratonovich
integral 0 is related to It o stochatisc integral . by
g
j
(t, x) dw
j
(t)
def
= g
j
(t, x) dw
j
(t) +
1
2
[d
x
g
j
(t, x)]g
j
(t, x)dt
Assuming that f, g
j
, j = 1, . . . , m, full the hypotheses (1), (2) then there is a
unique solution x(t) : [0, T] R
n
which is a continuous and F
t
-adapted process
satisfying the corresponding integral equation
(4) x(t) = x
0
+
_
t
0
f(s, x(s))ds +
m
j=1
_
t
0
g
j
(s, x(s)) dw
j
(s), t [0, T]
(see A. Friedman). Here w(t) = (w
1
(t), . . . , w
m
(t) : [0, T] R
m
is the stan-
dard Wiener process over the ltered probability space , T
t
T, P and
T
t
, t [0, T] T is the corresponding increasing family of -algebras. Con-
sider the exist ball time
(5)
def
= inft [0, T] : x(t) , B(x
0
, ) associated with the unique solution of (4)
and the ball centered at x
0
R
n
with radius > 0.
By denition, each set : t belongs to T
t
, t [0, T] and the characteristic
function
(t) : [0, T] 0, 1,
(t) = 1 for t,
(t) = 0 for < t, is an

T
t
-adapted process
Theorem 4.3.1. (stochastic rule of derivation)
Assume that the hypotheses (1) and (2) are fullled and let x(t) : t [0, T] be
the unique solution of (4).
Dene a stopping time : [0, T] as in (5) and consider a smooth scalar
function C
1,3
([0, T] R
n
). Then the following integral equation is valid
(6) (t , x(t )) = (0, x
0
) +
_
t
0
[
s
(s, x(s))+ <
x
(s, x(s)),
f(s, x(s)) >]ds +
m
j=1
_
t
0
<
x
(s, x(s))g
j
(s, x(s)) > dw
j
(s),
t [0, T]
where the Fisk-Stratonovich integral 0 is dened by
h
j
(s, x(s)) dw
j
(s) = h
j
(s, x(s)).dw
j
(s) +
1
2
[
x
h
j
(s, x(s))]g
j
(s, x(s))]ds
using Ito stochastic integral ..
Proof. Denote (t) = (t, x(t)) R, z(t) = col((t), x(t) R
n
, t [0, T] where
x(t), t [0, T] is the unique solution of (4) and C
1,3
([0, T] R
n
) is xed.
Dene new vector elds

f(t, x) = col(h
0
(t, x), f(t, x) R
n+1
,
(7) g
j
(t, x) = col(h
j
(t, x), g
j
(t, x)) R
n+1
, j 1, . . . , m,
where
h
0
(t, x)
def
=
t
(t, x)+ <
x
(t, x), f(t, x) >
and
h
j
(t, x) =<
x
(t, x), g
j
(t, x) >, (t, x) [0, T]R
n
, j 1 . . . , m, z = col(, x)
R
n+1
.
Let (x) : R
n
[0, 1] be a smooth function ( C
(R
n
)) such that (x) = 1
if x B(x
0
, ), (x) = 0 if x R
n
B(x
0
, 2) and 0 (x) 1 for any
x B(x
0
, 2) B(x
0
, ), where > 0 is xed arbitrarily. Multiplying

f and g
j
by C
(R
n
) we get
(8) f
(t, x)
def
= (x)

f(t, x), g
j
(t, x) = (x) g
j
(t, x), j = 1, . . . , m, as smooth func-
tions satisfying the hypothesis of Theorem 4.2.1 and denote z
(t), t [0, T]
the unique solution fullling the foloowing system of SDE. (z
(t) = (
(t), x
(t))
(9) z
(t) = z
0
+
_
t
0
f
(s, x
(s))ds +
m
j=1
_
t
0
g
j
(s, x
(s)) dw
j
(s), t [0, T], where
z
0
= col((0, x
0
), x
0
) R
n+1
and
g
j
(s, x
(s)) dw
j
)(s) = g
j
(s, x
(s)) dw
j
(s) +
1
2
[
x
g
j
(s, x
(s))]g
j
(s, x
(s))ds.
In particular, for t [0, ] and using the characteristic function
(t),
t [0, T], (see (5)) we rewrite (9) as
(10) z
(t ) = z
0
+
_
t
0
(s)
f(s, x(s))ds +
m
j=1
_
t
0
(s) g
j
(s, x(s)) dw(s) for any
t [0, T], where z
(t ) = (
(t ), x(t )) and g
j
(
f) are dened in (7).

Using Remark 4.2.3, we get
(11)
lim
0
E[[z
(t) z
(t )[[ = 0, for each t [0, T]

4.3. STOCHASTIC RULE OF DERIVATION 183
Here z
def
= z
(t ), t [0, T], veries the following system of ODE.

(12)
_
_
dz
dt
=
(t)f
(t, x) +
m
j=1
(t)g
j
(t, x)
dv
j
(t)
dt
, t [0, T]
z(0) = z
0
= ((0, x
0
), x
0
)
where the vector elds f
, g
j
, f 1, . . . m are dened in (8) and full the hypothesis
of Theorem 4.2.1. By denition, z
(t) = (
(t), x
(t), t [0, T], and (12) can be

rewritten as follows
(13)
_
_
d
(t)
dt
=
(t)(x
(t))
_
h
0
(t, x
(t)) +
m
j=1
h
j
(t, x
(t))
dv
j
(t)
dt
_
dx
(t)
dt
=
(t)(x
(t))
_
f(t, x
(t)) +
m
j=1
g
j
(t, x
(t))
dv
j
(t)
dt
_
(0) = (0, x
0
), x
(0) = x
0
, t [0, T],
where the scalar functions h
i
, i 0, 1, . . . , m, are given in (7).
In a similar way, write z
(t) = (
(t), x
(t)), t [0, T] and using (10) we get that
(t ) =
(t) and x
(t ) = x
(t), t [0, T] full the following system of SDE.

(14)
_
(t) = (0, x
0
) +
_
t
0
(s)h
0
(s, x(s))ds +
m
j=1
,
_
t
0
(s)h
j
(s, x(s)) dw
j
(s)
x(t ) = x
(t) = x
0
+
_
t
0
(s)f(s, x(s))ds +
m
j=1
_
t
0
(s)g
j
(s, x(s)) dw
j
(s)
Notice that
(t) = (t , x
(t)) and x
(t), t [0, T], > 0, are bounded and

convergent to
(t), x(t ) = x
(t), correspondigly, for each t [0, T] (see (11)),

when 0.
As a consequence
(15)
(t , x(t )) = lim
0
(t , x
(t)) = lim
0
(t) =
(t) =
= (0, x
0
) +
_
t
0
h
0
(s, x(s))ds +
m
j=1
_
t
0
h
j
(s, x(s)) dw
j
(s), t [0, T]
and the proof of the conclusion (6) is complete.
Comment on stochastic rule of derivation
The stochastic rule of derivation is based on the hypothesis (2) which involves higher
dierentiability properties of the diusion vector elds
g
j
C
1,2
b
([0, T] R
n
; R
n
), j 1, . . . , m
On the other hand, using a stopping time : [0, T], the right hand side of the
equation (6) is a semimartingale without imposing any growth condition on the test
function C
1,3
([0, T] R
n
). The standard stochastic rule of derivation does not
contain a stopping time and it can be accomplished assuming the following growth
condition
(16) [
t
(t, x)[, [
xi
(t, x)[, [
2
xixj
(t, x)[ k(1 +[[x[[
p
), i, j 1, . . . , n,
x R
n
, where p 1 (natural) and k > 0 are xed. Adding condition (16) to the
hypotheses (1) and (2) of Theorem 4.3.1, and using a sequence of stopping times
: [0, T], lim
= T, we get the following stochastic rule of derivation

(17)
(t, x(t)) = (0, x
0
) +
_
t
0
[
s
(s, x(s))+ <
x
(s, x(s)), f(s, x(s)) >]ds+
+
m
j=1
_
t
0
<
x
(s, x(s)), g
j
(s, x(s)) > dw
j
(s), t [0, T]
.
4.4 Appendix
I. Two problems for stochastic ows asociated with
nonlinear parabolic equations
(I. Molnar , C. Varsan, Functionals associated with gradient stochastic ows and
nonlinear parabolic equations, preprint IMAR 12/2009)
4.4. APPENDIX 185
4.4.1 Introduction
Consider that x
(t; ) : t [0, T] is the unique solution of SDE driven by complete

vector elds f ((
b
(
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
) and g ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
),
_
d
t
x = ()f( x)dt +g( x) dw(t), t [0, T], x R
n
,
x(0) = R
n
,
(4.34)
where ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
) and w(t) R is a scalar Wiener process over a complete
ltered probability space , T T
t
, P. We recall that Fisk-Stratonovich integral
in (4.34) is computed by
g(x) dw(t) = g(x) dw(t) +
1
2
x
g(x) g(x)dt,
using Ito stochastic integral .
We are going to introduce some nonlinear SPDE or PDE of parabolic type which
describe the evolution of stochastic functionals u(t, x) := h((t, x)), or S(t, x) :=
Eh( x
(T; t, x)), t [0, T], x R

n
, for a xed h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
). Here = (t, x) :
t [0, T], x R
n
is the unique solution satisfying integral equations
x
(t; ) = x R
n
, t [0, T]. (4.35)
The evolution of S(t, x) : t [0, T], x R
n
will be dened by some nonlinear
backward parabolic equation considering that x
(s; t, x) : s [t, T], x R

n
is the
unique solution of SDE
_
d
s
x = ((t, x))f( x)ds +g( x) dw(s), s [t, T],
x(t) = x R
n
.
4.4.2 Some problems and their solutions
Problem (P1). Assume that g and f commute using Lie bracket, i.e.
[g, f](x) = 0, x R
n
, (4.36)
where [g, f](x) := [
x
g(x)]f(x) [
x
f(x)]g(x),
TV K = [0, 1), (4.37)
where V = sup[
x
(x)[ : x R
n
and K = sup[f(x)[; x R
n
.
Under the hypotheses (4.36) and (4.37), nd the nonlinear SPDE of parabolic
type satised by u(t, x) = h((t, x)) : [0, T], x R
n
, h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
), where
= (t, x) R
n
: t [0, T], x R
n
is the unique continuous and T
t
-adapted
solution of the integral equation (4.35).
Problem (P2). Using = (t, x) found in (P1), describe the evolution of a func-
tional S(t, x) := Eh( x
(T; t, x)) using backward parabolic equations, where x
(s; t, x) :
s [t, T] is the unique solution of SDE
_
d
s
x = ((t, x))f( x)ds + g( x) dw(s), s [t, T]
x(t) = x R
n
.
(4.38)
4.4.3 Solution for the Problem (P1)
Remark 4.4.1. Under the hypotheses (4.36) and (4.37) of (P1), the unique solution
of integral equations (4.35) will be found as a composition
(t, x) =

(t, z(t, x)), (4.39)
where z(t, x) := G(w(t))[x] and =

(t, z), t [0, T], z R
n
, is the unique
deterministic solution satisfying integral equations
= F((t; ))[z] =:

V (t, z; ), t [0, T], z R
n
. (4.40)
Here F()[z] and G()[z], , R, are the global ows generated by complete vector
elds f and g correspondingly, and (t; ) = t(). The unique solution of (4.40) is
constructed in the following
Lemma 4.4.2. Assume that (4.37) is fullled. Then there exists a unique smooth
deterministic mapping =

(t, z) : t [0, T], x R
n
solving integral equations
(4.40) such that
_
_
F((t;

(t, z)))[
(t, z)] = z R
n
, t [0, T],
[
(t, z) z[ R(T, z) :=
r(T, z)
1
, t [0, T], where r(T, z) = TK[(z)[,
(4.41)
_
(t, z) +
z
(t, z)f(z)(
(t, z)) = 0, t [0, T], x R

n
,
(0, z) = z R
n
.
(4.42)
Proof. The mapping

V (t, z; ) (see (4.40)) is a contractive application with respect
to R
n
, uniformly of (t, z) [0, T] R
n
which allows us to get the unique solution
of (4.40) using a standard procedure (Banach theorem). By a direct computation, we
4.4. APPENDIX 187
get
[
V (t, z; )[ = [f(
V (t, z; ))
(t; )[ TV K = [0, 1), (4.43)

for any t [0, T], z R
n
, R
n
, where
(t; ) is a row vector. The corresponding

convergent sequence
k
(t, z) : t [0, T], z R
n
k0
is constructed fullling
0
(t, z) = z,
k+1
(t, z) =

V (t, z;
k
(t, z)), t 0, (4.44)
_
[
k+1
(t, z)
k
(t, z)[
k
[
1
(t, z)
0
(t, z)[, k 0,
[
1
(t, z)
0
(t, z)[ [
V (t, z; z) z[ TK[(z)[ =: r(T, z).

(4.45)
Using (4.45) we obtain that
k
(t, z)
k0
is convergent and
(t, z) = lim
k
k
(t, z), [
(t, z) z[
r(T, z)
1
=: R(T, z), t [0, T]. (4.46)
Passing k into (4.44) and using (4.46) we get the rst conclusion (4.41). On the
other hand, notice that
V (t, z; ) : t [0, T], z R

n
of (4.40) fulls
V (t, y(t, ); ) = , t [0, T], where y(t, ) = F((t; ))[]. (4.47)

This shows that all the components of

V (t, z; ) R
n
are rst integrals associated
with the vector eld f
(z) = ()f(z), z R
n
, for each R
n
, i.e.
V (t, y(t, ); ) + [
z
V (t, y(t, ); )]f( y(t, ))() = 0, t [0, T] (4.48)

is valid for each R
n
. In particular, for =

(t, z) we get y(t,

(t, z)) = z and
(4.48) becomes (H-J)-equation
V (t, z;

(t, z)) + [
z
V (t, z;

(t, z)]f(z)(
(t, z)) = 0, t [0, T], z R

n
. (4.49)
Combining (4.40) and (4.49), by direct computation, we convince ourselves that =
(t, z) fulls the following nonlinear (H-J)-equation (see (4.42))

_
(t, z) + [
z
(t, z)]f(z)(
(t, z)) = 0, t [0, T], z R

n
,
(0, z) = z R
n
,
(4.50)
Remark 4.4.3. Under the hypothesis (4.36), the x
(t; ) : t [0, T], R

n
generated by SDE (4.34) can be represented as follows

x
(t; ) = G(w(t)) F((t; ))[] = H(t, w(t); ), t [0, T], R

n
(4.51)
where (t; ) = t().
Lemma 4.4.4. Assume that (4.36) and (4.37) are satised and consider =
(t, z) : t [0, T], z R

n
found in Lemma 4.4.2. Then the stochastic ow gen-
erated by SDE (4.34) fulls
x
(t; ) : t [0, T], R

n
can be represented as in (4.51), (4.52)
(t, x) =

(t, z(t, x)) is the unique solution of integral equations (4.35),
where z(t, x) = G(w(t))[x].
(4.53)
Proof. Using the hypothesis (4.36), we see easily that
y(, )[] := G() F()[], , R, R
n
(4.54)
is the unique solution of the gradient system
_
y(, )[] = f(y(, )[]),
y(, )[] = g(y(, )[]),

y(0, 0)[] =
(4.55)
Applying the standard rule of stochastic derivation associated with the smooth map-
ping (, ) := y(, )[] and the continuous process = (t; ) = t(), = w(t),
we get that y
(t; ) = y((t; ), w(t)), t [0, T], fulls SDE (4.34), i.e.

_
d
t
y
(t; ) = ()f( y
(t; x))dt +g( y
(t; )) dw(t), t [0, T],

y
(0; ) = .
(4.56)
On the other hand, the unicity of the solution satisfying (4.34) lead us to the conclu-
sion that x
(t; ) = y
(t; ), t [0, T], and (4.52) is proved. The conclusion (4.53) is

a direct consequence of (4.52) combined with =

(t, z) : t [0, T], z R
n
is the
solution dened in Lemma 4.4.2. The proof is complete.
Lemma 4.4.5. Under the hypotheses in Lemma 4.4.4, consider the continuous and
T
t
-adapted process z(t, x) = G(w(t))[x], t [0, T], x R
n
. Then the following
SPDE of parabolic type is valid
_
d
t
z(t, x) +
x
z(t, x)g(x)dw(t) = 0, t [0, T], xx R
n
,
z(0, x) = x
(4.57)
where the is computed by
h(t, x)dw(t) = h(t, x) dw(t)
1
2
x
h(t, x)g(x)dt,
using Ito .
Proof. The conclusion (4.57) is a direct consequence of applying standard rule of
stochastic derivation associated with = w(t) and smooth deterministic mapping
H()[x] := G()[x]. In this respect, using H() G()[] = R
n
for any
4.4. APPENDIX 189
x = G()[], we get
_
H()[x] =
x
H()[x] g(x), R, x R
n
,
H()[x] =
H()[x] =
x
H()[x] g(x)
=
x
x
H()[x] g(x) g(x), R, x R
n
.
(4.58)
The standard rule of stochastic derivation lead us to SDE
d
t
z(t, x) =
H()[x]
=w(t)
dw(t) +
1
2
H()[x]
=w(t)
dt, t [0, T], (4.59)
and rewritting the right hand side of (4.59) (see (4.58)) we get SPDE of parabolic
type given in (4.57). The proof is complete.
Lemma 4.4.6. Assume the hypotheses (4.36) and (4.37) are fullled and consider
= (t, x) : t [0, T], x R
n
dened in Lemma (4.4.4). Then u(t, x) := h((t, x)),
t [0, T], x R
n
, h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
), satises the following nonlinear SPDE of
parabolic type
_
d
t
u(t, x) +
x
u(t, x), f(x)((t, x))dt +
x
u(t, x), g(x)dw(t) = 0
u(0, x) = h(x), t [0, T], x R
n
,
(4.60)
h(t, x)dw(t) = h(t, x) dw(t)
1
2
x
h(t, x)g(x)dt.
Proof. By denition (see Lemma (4.4.4)), (t, x) =

(t, z(t, x)), t [0, T], where
z(, x) = G(w(t))[x] and
(t, z) R
n
: t [0, T], z R
n
satises nonlinear (H-J)-
equations (4.42) of Lemma 4.4.2. In addition z(t, x) R
n
: t [0, T], x R
n
fulls
SPDE (4.57) in Lemma 4.4.5, i.e.
d
t
z(t, x) +
x
z(t, x)dw(t) = 0, t [0, T], x R
n
. (4.61)
Applying the standard rule of stochastic derivation associated with the smooth map-
ping =

(t, z) : t [0, T], z R
n
and stochastic process z(t, x) := G(w(t))[x] =:
H(w(t))[x], t [0, T], we get the following nonlinear SPDE
_
d
t
(t, x) +
x
(t, x)f(x)((t, x))dt +
x
(t, x)g(x)dw(t) = 0,
(0, x) = x, t [0, T].
(4.62)
In addition, the functional u(t, x) = h((t, x)) can be rewritten u(t, x) = u(t, z(t, x)),
where u(t, z) := h(
(t, z)) is a smooth satisfying nonlinear (H-J)-equations (see (4.42)

of Lemma 4.4.2)
_
t
u(t, z) +
z
u(t, z), f(z)(
(t, z)) = 0, t [0, T], z R

n
,
u(0, z) = h(z).
(4.63)
Using (4.61)and (4.63) we obtain SDPE fullled by u(t, x),
_
d
t
u(t, x) +
z
u(t, z(t, x)), f( z(t, x))((t, x))dt +
x
u(t, x), g(x)dw(t) = 0,
u(0, x) = h(x), t [0, T], x R
n
.
(4.64)
The hypothesis (4.36) allows us to write
z
u(t, z(t, x)), f( z(t, x)) =
z
u(t, z(t, x))[
x
z(t, x)][
x
z(t, x)]
1
f( z(t, x))
=
x
u(t, x), f(x), t [0, T], x R
n
,
(4.65)
and using (4.65) into (4.64) we get the conclusion (4.60),
_
t
u(t, x) +
x
u(t, x), f(x)((t, x))dt +
x
u(t, x), g(x)dw(t) = 0,
u(0, x) = h(x), t [0, T], x R
n
,
(4.66)
h(t, x)dw(t) =
1
2
x
h(t, x)g(x)dt +h(t, x) dw(t), (4.67)
using Ito integral . The proof is complete.
Remark 4.4.7. The complete solution of Problem (P1) is contained in Lemmas
4.4.24.4.6. We shall rewrite them as a theorem.
Theorem 4.4.8. Assume that the vector elds f ((
b
(
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
), g
((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
), and scalar function ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
) full the hypotheses (4.36)
and (4.37). Consider the continuous and T
t
- = (t, x R
n
) : t [0, T], x R
n
satisfying integral equations (4.35). Then u(t, x) := h((t, x)), t [0, T], x R
n
,
fulls nonlinear SPDE of parabolic type (4.60) (see Lemma 4.4.6), for each h ((
1
b

(
2
)(R
n
).
4.4.4 Solution for the Problem (P2)
Using the same notations as in subsection 4.4.3, we consider the unique solution
x
(s; t, x) : s [t, T] satisfying SDE (4.38) for each 0 t < T and x R

n
. As far
as SDE (4.38) is a , the evolution of a functional S(t, x) := Eh( x
(T; t, x)), t [0, T],

x R
n
, h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
), will be described using the pathwise representation of the
conditional mean values functional
v(t, x) = Eh( x
(T; t, x)) [ (t, x), 0 t < T, x R

n
. (4.68)
Assuming the hypotheses (4.36) and (4.37) we may and do write the following integral
representation
x
(T; t, x) = G(w(T) w(t)) F[(T t)((t, x))][x], 0 t < T, x R

n
, (4.69)
4.4. APPENDIX 191
for a solution of SDE (4.38), where G()[z] and F()[z], , R, z R
n
, are the
global ows generated by g, f ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
). The right side hand of (4.69) is a
continuous mapping of the two independent random variables, z
1
= [w(T)w(t)] R
and z
2
= (t, x) R
n
(T
t
-measurable) for each 0 t < T, x R
n
. A direct
consequence of this remark is to use a
y(t, x; ) = G(w(T) w(t)) F[(T t)()][x], 0 t < T, (4.70)
and to compute the conditional mean values (4.68) by
v(t, x) = [Eh(y(t, x; ))]( = (t, x)). (4.71)
Here the functional
u(t, x; ) := Eh(y(t, x; )), t [0, T], x R
n
, (4.72)
satises a backward parabolic equation (Kolmogorovs equation) for each R
n
and
rewrite (4.71) as follows,
v(t, x) = u(t, x; (t, x)), 0 t < T, x R
n
. (4.73)
In conclusion, the functional S(t, x) can be written as
S(t, x) = E[Eh( x
(T; t, x)) [ (t, x) = Eu(t, x; (t, x)), 0 t < T, x R

n
,
(4.74)
where u(t, x; ) : t [0, T], x R
n
satises the corresponding backward parabolic
equations with parameter R
n
,
_
t
u(t, x; ) +
x
u(t, x; ), f(x, ) +
1
2
2
x
u(t, x; )g(x), g(x) = 0,
u(T, x; ) = h(x), f(x, ) := ()f(x) +
1
2
[
x
g(x)]g(x).
(4.75)
We conclude these remarks by a theorem.
Theorem 4.4.9. Assume that the vector elds f, g and the scalar function of SDE
(4.38) full the hypotheses (4.36) (4.37), where the continuous and T
t
- (t, x) R
n
:
t [0, T] is dened in Theorem 4.4.8. Then the evolution of the functional
S(t, x) := Eh( x
(T; t, x)), t [0, T], x R

n
, h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
) (4.76)
can be described as in (4.74), where u(t, x) : t [0, T], x R
n
satises linear
backward parabolic equations (4.75) for each R
n
.
Remark 4.4.10. Consider the case of several vector elds dening both the drift and
diusion of SDE (4.34), i.e.
_
_
d
t
x = [
m
i=1
i
()f
i
( x)]dt +
m
i=1
g
i
( x) dw
i
(t), t [0, T],
x(0) = R
n
.
(4.77)
We notice that the analysis presented in Theorems 4.4.8 and 4.4.9 can be extended to
this multiple vector elds case (see next section).
4.4.5 Multiple vector elds case
We are given two nite sets of vector elds f
1
, . . . , f
m
((
b
(
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
)
and g
1
, . . . , g
m
((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
) and consider the unique solution x
(t, ) : t
[0, T], R
n
of SDE
_
_
d
t
x = [
m
i=1
i
()f
i
( x)]dt +
m
i=1
g
i
( x) dw
i
(t), t [0, T], x R
n
,
x(0) = R
n
(4.78)
where = (
1
, . . . ,
m
) ((
1
b
(
2
) are xed and w = (w
1
(t), . . . , w
m
(t)) R
m
is a
standard Wiener process over a complete ltered probability space , T T
t
, P.
Each in (4.78) is computed by
g
i
(x) dw
i
(t) = g
i
(x) dw
i
(t) +
1
2
[
x
g
i
(x)]g
i
(x)dt, (4.79)
using Ito integral .
Assume that = (t, x) R
n
: t [0, T], x R
n
is the unique continuous and
T
t
-adapted solution satisfying integral equations
x
(t; ) = x R
n
, t [0, T]. (4.80)
For each h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
), associate stochastic functionals u(t, x) = h((t, x) :
t [0, T], x R
n
) and S(t, x) = Eh( x
(T; t, x)) : t [0, T], x R

n
, where
x
(s; t, x) : s [t, T], x R

n
satises the following SDE
_
_
d
s
x = [
m
i=1
i
((t, x))f
i
( x)]ds +
m
i=1
g
i
( x) dw
i
(t), s [t, T],
x(t) = x.
Problem (P1). Assume that
_
M = f
1
, . . . , f
m
, g
1
, . . . , g
m
are muttualy commuting using Lie bracket i.e.
[X
1
, X
2
](x) = 0 for any pair X
1
, X
2
M
(4.81)
TV
i
K
i
=
i
[0,
1
m
), (4.82)
4.4. APPENDIX 193
where V
i
:= sup[
x
i
(x)[ : x R
n
and K
i
= [f
i
(x)[ : x R
n
, i = 1, . . . , m.
Under the hypotheses (4.81) and (4.82), nd the nonlinear SPDE of parabolic
type satised by u(t, x) = h((t, x)), t [0, T], x R
n
, h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
), where
= (t, x) R
n
: t [0, T], x R
n
is the unique continuous and T
t
-adapted
solution of integral equations (4.80).
Problem (P2). Using = (t, x) R
n
: t [0, T], x R
n
found in (P1), describe
the evolution of a functional S(t, x) = Eh( x
(T; t, x)) using backward parabolic equa-

tions, where x
(s; t, x) : s [t, T] is the unique solution of SDE

_
_
d
s
x = [
m
i=1
i
((t, x))f
i
( x)]ds +
m
i=1
g
i
( x) dw
i
(s), s [t, T],
x(t) = x R
n
.
(4.83)
4.4.6 Solution for (P1)
Under the hypotheses (4.81) and (4.82), the unique solution of SPDE (4.78) can be
represented by
x
(t; ) = G(w(t)) F((t; ))[] =: H(t, w(t); ) (4.84)

where
G()[z] = G
1
(
1
) G
m
(
m
)[z], = (
1
, . . . ,
m
) R
m
,
F()[z] = F
1
(
1
) F
m
(
m
)[z], (t; ) = (t
1
(), . . . , t
m
()) R
m
and
(F
i
(
i
)[z], G
i
(
i
)[z]) :
i
R, z R
n
are the global ows generated by (f

i
, g
i
), i 1, . . . , m.
The arguments for solving (P1) in the case of one pair (f, g) of vector elds
(see subsection (4.4.3)) can be used also here and we get the following similar results.
Under the representation (4.84), the unique continuous and T
t
-adapted solution =
(t, x) : t [0, T], x R
n
solving equations
x
(t; ) = x R
n
, t [0, T] (4.85)
will be found as a composition
(t, x) =

(t, z(t, x)), z(t, x) := G(w(t))[x]. (4.86)
Here =

(t, z), t [0, T], z R
n
is the unique solution satisfying
= F((t; ))[z] =:

V (t, z; ), t [0, T], z R
n
. (4.87)
Lemma 4.4.11. Asume that (4.81) and (4.82) is fullled. Then there exists a unique
smooth mapping =

(t, z) : t [0, T], z R
n
solving (4.87) such that
_
_
F((t;

(t, z)))[
(t, z)] = z R
n
, t [0, T],
[
(t, z) z[ R(T, z) :=
r(T, z)
1
, t [0, T], z R
n
,
(4.88)
where =
1
+ +
m
[0, 1) and r(T, z) = T
m
i=1
K
i
[
i
(z)[.
In addition, the following nonlinear (H-J)-equation is valid
_
(t, z) +
z
(t, z)[
m
i=1
i
(
(t, z))f
i
(z)] = 0, t [0, T], z R
n
,
(0, z) = z.
(4.89)
The proof is based on the arguments of Lemma 4.4.2 in subsection 4.4.3.
Lemma 4.4.12. Assume that (4.81) and (4.82) are satised and consider =
(t, z) R
n
: t [0, T], z R
n
found in Lemma (4.4.11). Then the generated by
SDE (4.78) fulls
x
(t; ) : t [0, T], R

n
can be represented as in (4.84), (4.90)
(t, x) =

(t, z(t, x)), is the unique solution of (4.85),
where z(t, x) = G(w(t))[x].
(4.91)
The proof follows the arguments used in Lemma 4.4.4 of section 4.4.3.
Lemma 4.4.13. Under the hypothesis (4.81), consider the continuous and T
t
- z(t, x) =
G(w(t))[x], t [0, T], x R
n
. Then the following SPDE of is valid
_
_
d
t
z(t, x) +
m
i=1
x
z(t, x)g
i
(x)dw
i
(t) = 0, t [0, T], x R
n
z(0, x) = x,
(4.92)
h
i
(t, x)dw
i
(t) = h
i
(t, x) dw
i
(t)
1
2
x
h
i
(t, x)g
i
(x)dt
using Ito .
4.4. APPENDIX 195
Proof. The conclusion (4.92) is a direct consequence of applying standard rule of asso-
ciated with = w(t) R
m
and smooth deterministic mapping H()[x] = G()[x].
In this respect, using H() G()[] = R
n
for any x = G()[], we get
_
i
H()[x] =
x
H()[x]g
i
(x), = (
1
, . . . ,
m
) R
m
, x R
n
,
2
i
H()[x] =
i
i
H()[x] =
i
x
H()[x]g
i
(x)
=
x
x
H()[x]g
i
(x)g
i
(x), R
m
, x R
n
(4.93)
for each i 1, . . . , m. Recall that the standard rule of lead us to SDE
d
t
z(t, x) =
m
i=1
i
H()[x]
(=w(t))
dw
i
(t) +
1
2
m
i=1
2
i
H()[x]
(=w(t))
dt, (4.94)
for any t [0, T], x R
n
. Rewritting the right hand side of (4.94) (see (4.93)) we
get SPDE of parabolic type given in (4.92).
Lemma 4.4.14. Assume the hypotheses (4.81) and (4.82) are fullled and consider
= (t, x) : t [0, T], x R
n
dened in Lemma 4.4.12. Then u(t, x) := h((t, x)),
t [0, T], x R
n
, h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
), satises the following nonlinear SPDE
_
_
d
t
u(t, x)+
x
u(t, x),
m
i=1
i
((t, x)f
i
(x))dt
+
m
i=1
x
u(t, x), g
i
(x)dw
i
(t) = 0, t [0, T]
u(0, x) = h(x)
(4.95)
where the nonstandard is computed by
h
i
(t, x)dw
i
(t) = h
i
(t, x) dw
i
(t)
1
2
x
h
i
(t, x)g
i
(x)dt.
The proof uses the same arguments as in Lemma 4.4.6 of section 4.4.3.
Theorem 4.4.15. Assume that the vector elds f
1
, . . . , f
m
((
b
(
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
),
g
1
, . . . , g
m
((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
) and scalar functions
1
, . . . ,
m
((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
)
full the hypotheses 4.81 and 4.82
Consider the continuous and T
t
- = (t, x) R
n
: t [0, T], x R
n
satis-
fying integral equations (4.85) (see Lemma 4.4.12). Then u(t, x) := h((t, x)) : t
[0, T], x R
n
fulls nonlinear SPDE of parabolic type (4.95) (see Lemma 4.4.14) for
each h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
).
4.4.7 Solution for (P2)
As far as SDE (4.83) is a non-markovian system, the evolution of a functional S(t, x) :=
Eh( x
(T; t, x)), t [0, T], x R

n
, for each h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
) will be described using
the pathwise representation of the conditioned mean values functional
v(t, x) := Eh( x
(T; t, x)) [ (t, x), 0 t < T, x R

n
. (4.96)
Here x
(T; t, x) can be expressed using the following integral representation

x
(T; t, x) = G(w(T) w(t)) F[(T t)((t, x))](x), 0 t < T, (4.97)

where G()[z] and F()[z], = (
1
, . . . ,
m
) R
m
, x R
n
, are dened in (P1)
(see (4.84)) for := (
1
, . . . ,
m
). The right hand side of (4.97) is a continuous
mapping of the two independent random variables, z
1
= w(T) w(t) R
m
and
z
2
= (t, x) R
n
(T
t
-measurable) for each 0 t < T, x R
n
.
Using the parameterized random variable
y(t, x; ) = G(w(T) w(t)) F[(T t)()](x), 0 t < T (4.98)
we may and do compute the functional v(t, x) in (4.96) by
v(t, x) = [Eh(y(t, x; ))]( = (t, x)), 0 t < T, x R
n
. (4.99)
Here, the functional
u(t, x; ) = Eh(y(t, x; )), t [0, T], x R
n
, (4.100)
satises a backward parabolic equation (Kolmogorovs equation) for each R
n
and
rewrite (4.99) as follows,
v(t, x) = u(t, x; (t, x)), 0 t < T, x R
n
. (4.101)
In conclusion, the functional S(t, x) = Eh( x
(T; t, x)) can be reprezented by

S(t, x) = E[Eh( x
(T; t, x)) [ (t, x)] = Eu(t, x; (t, x)) (4.102)

for any 0 t < T, x R
n
, where u(t, x; ) : t [0, T], x R
n
satises the
corresponding backward parabolic equations with parameter R
n
,
_
t
u(t, x; ) +
x
u(t, x; ), f(x, ) +
1
2
m
i=1
2
x
u(t, x; )g
i
(x), g
i
(x) = 0,
u(T, x; ) = h(x), f(x, ) =
m
i=1
i
()f
i
(x) +
1
2
m
i=1
[
x
g
i
(x)]g
i
(x).
(4.103)
4.4. APPENDIX 197
We conclude these remarks by a theorem.
Theorem 4.4.16. Assume that the vector elds f
1
, . . . , f
m
((
b
(
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
),
g
1
, . . . , g
m
((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
; R
n
), and scalar functions = (
1
, . . . ,
m
) ((
1
b

(
2
)(R
n
) of SDE (4.83) full the hypotheses (4.81) and (4.82). Then the evolution of
the functional
S(t, x) := Eh( x
(T; t, x)), t [0, T], x R

n
, h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
) (4.104)
can be described as in (4.102), where u(t, x; ) : t [0, T], x R
n
satises linear
backward parabolic equations (4.103), for each R
n
.
Final remark. One may wonder about the meaning of the martingale representa-
tion associated with the non-markovian functionals h( x
(T; t, x)), h ((
1
b
(
2
)(R
n
).
In this respect, we may use the parameterized functional u(t, x; ) : t [0, T], x
R
n
fullling backward parabolic equations (4.103). Write
h( x
(T; t, x)) = u(T, x
(T; t, x);
= (t, x)) (4.105)

and apply the standard rule of stochastic derivation associated with smooth mapping
u(s, x;
) : s [0, T], x R
n
and stochastic process x
(s; t, x) : s [t, T]. We get

h( x
(T; t, x)) =u(t, x;
) +
_
T
t
(
s
+L
)(u)(s, x
(s; t, x);
)ds
+
m
i=1
_
T
t
x
u(s, x
(s; t, x);
), g
i
(x)dw
i
(s),
(4.106)
where L
(u)(s, x;
) :=
x
u(s, x;
), f(x,
) +
1
2
m
i=1
2
x
u(s, x;
)g
i
(x), g
i
(x) coin-
cides with parabolic operator in PDE (4.103). Using (4.103) for
= (t, x), we obtain

the following martingale representation
h( x
(T; t, x)) = u(t, x; (t, x))+

m
i=1
_
T
t
x
u(s, x
(s; t, x);
), g
i
(x) dw
i
(s), (4.107)
which shows that the standard constant in the markovian case is replaced by a T
t
-
measurable random variable u(t, x; (t, x)). In addition, the backward evolution of
stochastic functional Q(t, x) := h( x
(T; t, x)) : t [0, T], x R

n
given in (4.107)
depends essentially on the forward evolution process (t, x) for each t [0, T] and
x R
n
.
The writing of this part has much in common with the references [1] and [11].
Bibliography
[1] A. Friedman, Stochastic Dierential Equations and Applications, Academic Press
vol. 1, 1975.
[2] A. Halanay, Dierential Equations , Ed. Didactica and Pedagogica, 1972.
[3] P. Hartman, Ordinary Dierential Equations, The Johns Hopking Univerisrt, John
Wiley Sons, 1964.
[4] M. Gianquinta, S. Hildebrandt, Calculas of Variations, vol. 1, Springer, 1996.
[5] S. Godounov, Equations de la Physique Mathematique, Nauka, Moskow, Trans-
lated mir, 1973.
[6] P. J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Dierential Equations, Springer, 1986
(Graduate texts in mathematics; 107).
[7] L. Pontriaguine, Equations Dierentielles Ordinaires, Editions MIR, Moskow,
1969.
[8] R. Racke, Lectures on Nonlinear Evolution Equations, Vieweg, 1992.
[9] G. Silov, Multiple Variable Real Functions, Analysis, MIR, Moskow, 1975.
[10] S. L. Sobolev, Mathematical Physics Equations, Nauka, Moskow, 1966.
[11] C. Varsan, Applications of Lie Algebras to Hyperbolic and Stochastic Dierential
equations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
[12] C. Varsan, Basic of Mathematical Physics Equations and Element of Dierential
Equations, Ex, PONTO, Constanta, 2000.
[13] J. J. Vrabie, Dierential Equations, Matrix-Rom, 1999.
199

Arxiv Pde Intro

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Arxiv Pde Intro

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

a

I and assuming that x

) > 0. The proof for x

is similar. The proof is complete.

) = 0 which implies (see uniqueness) z

and linear with respect to y R

(t) = ( y(t), (t)) : [o, ) Y

(t), t 0 is given in (1.68). We may and

(t) + (expt)g(z(t), (t)), t 0

(t, x) + y(t), t 0 (1.76)

(t) y(t)] + (expt)f( z

(t, x) [= 0 , for each x R

(t, x) = (exp2t)h(z(t, x)), t 0, where h(z) =[ z [

()z, z] > +2 < f(), z >

()is symmetric for each

, given in (1.66). Rewrite (1.79) as

(t, x) (exp2t) < [[ [ I

, for some c 0 (1.84)

()z, z > 2 < f(), z >=

(t; x) : t 0 fullling (1.90) leads us

(t)) : t 0 is a continuous and

is a constant. In conclusion, for each < 0, [ [> sup

(t) = ( y(t), (t)) : [0, ) is xed arbitrarily. In addition, let z(t, x) : t 0

(t, x) y(t) [= lim

(t, x) [= 0 for each x R

) [=| B | associated with the unknown matrix A(), (bounded set)

() and (1.3.3) gets the

K I G there exists a constant L(W) > 0 such that[ f(x, , y

(x)), [0, 1], x I

)) [ C and let L > 0 be such that

G and the following

veries the following system

[z(x, s +) z(x, s) z(x)], ,= 0

D. In this respect, denote D(x) = y R

= 0. Then the unique solution of the

= y ; [ y [< . Notice that g(y) = Ay + f(y), y

= 0 therefore, the assumptions

D where > 0. It relies on the unique Cauchy problem associated

x(t, ) is nonsingular for any(t, x) I

1 and as a consequence,the linear space K L

Using (2.215), we get

) for any 0 < s

< s < 1 and for a linear equation

(x), = 1, ..., q. Denote X = R

(x) needed to represent all dierent k th order derivatives of the components

determined by the system

in the n = jet space X U

, corresponding to translations of the dependent variable,it suces

[(x +, y + eta, z +)]

F(x, y)dxdy (3.103)

, are continuously dierentiable and we get

Denote nthe orthogonal vector at the surface = B(P

is the orthogonal vector at oriented in the opposite direction of

As far as the maximum principle is valid for (y) :

, 0 < < 3, for some constant A > 0 (3.151)

), where > 0 is fixed

([0, 1]; R) = (([0, 1]; R) : (0) = (1) = 0.

([0, 1]; R) is too large

2sinj x, x [0, T] , j 1 (3.199)

U(0, x) = (x) , x [0, 1] , ((I

Rwhich is rst order continuously derivable of t (0, a) second order continuously

(t, x)[ 2(1 ++, ..... +

(t, x) = F(x, u(t, x),