Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
on Road Traffic Pollution for Proposed Housing Development at Urlay View, Egglescliffe
File reference number: 00895(air) July 2012
Northumbrian Water Scientific Services Head Office Howdon STW Newcastle-upon-Tyne Tyne & Wear NE28 0QD Tel: 0191 296 8500 Fax: 0191 296 8560 stephen.wigham@nwl.co.uk www.nw-ss.co.uk
acoustics & vibration air emissions air quality contaminated land dioxins legionella control potable water waste waters water supply regulations
Report Title Client NWSS Report No: Status & Version Date of Release
Air quality impact assessment using dispersion modelling for proposed residential development at Urlay View, Egglescliffe Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd and West Raynham Developments Ltd 00895revA(air) 00895 Final, Final Issue 1 25 2 July 2012 The contents of this report are confidential. No part thereof is to be cited without the express permission of NWSS or Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd and West Raynham Developments Ltd. This report is not to be Ltd. used for contractual or engineering purposes unless the front cover contractual sheet is signed where indicated by the author, reviewer and approver and the report is desig designated Final.
th
Terms
Signature
Date 25/07/12
This report is not to be used for contractual or engineering purposes unless the front cover sheet is signed where indicated by both the originator of the report and the approver and the report is designated Final on the cover sheet.
Table of Contents
1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 1.3 2.0 3.0 Scope of Assessment ............................................................................................................ 3 Methodology for Detailed Assesssment ............................................................................. 4 Criteria - The UK Air Quality Standards & Objectives ........................................................ 5 Receptors Considered within the Disperision Model ........................................................ 7
4.0 Background Air Quality ........................................................................................................ 10 5.0 Predicted Air Quality ........................................................................................................... 11 5.1 5.2 Modelling Details ............................................................................................................... 11 Predictions and Assessment of Impacts ........................................................................... 12
6.0 Suggested Mitigation Measures ......................................................................................... 17 7.0 Residual Effects ................................................................................................................... 18 8.0 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 19 9.0 References ............................................................................................................................ 20
Appendices
Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Assessed Receptor Locations Concentration Contour Maps Road Traffic Predictions
1.1
1.1.1
Introduction
Northumbrian Water Scientific Services (NWSS) have been commissioned by Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd and West Raynham Developments Ltd to prepare a report detailing the potential impact of local road traffic pollution on a proposed residential development at Urlay View, Egglescliffe. The proposed residential development will be located on land used previously for agriculture, and is illustrated in Appendix I. The assessment has been performed primarily to examine the effects on local air quality at human receptor points, both existing and proposed, as a consequence of emissions from local road traffic sources. The results of the assessment are presented as tabular data and in the form of contour plots, allowing comparison with the long and short-term Air Quality Standards as quoted within The Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales & Northern Ireland (DEFRA, 2000, as amended 2003 and 2007).
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
Emissions from road traffic and residential activities are considered to provide the main contributions to the background concentrations in the area. This is supported by information held by the National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory.
1.3
1.3.1
2.0
2.1
Sulphur dioxide
Averaging period One hour One day Limit value 350 g/m not to be exceeded more than 24 times a calendar year 125 g/m not to be exceeded more than 3 times a calendar year
3 3
Nitrogen dioxide
Averaging period One hour Calendar year Limit value 200 g/m not to be exceeded more than 18 times a calendar year 40 g/m3
3
Benzene
Averaging period Calendar year Limit value 5 g/m3
Lead
Averaging period Calendar year Limit value 0.5 g/m3
PM10
Averaging period One day Calendar year Limit value 50 g/m3, not to be exceeded more than 35 times a calendar year 40 g/m3
PM2.5
Averaging period Calendar year Limit value 25 g/m3 Margin of tolerance Date by which limit value is to be met 1st January 2015
20% on 11th June 2008, decreasing on the next 1st January and every 12 months thereafter by equal annual percentages to reach 0% by 1st January 2015
Carbon monoxide
Averaging period Maximum eight hour daily mean(1)
(1)
The maximum daily eight hour mean concentration of carbon monoxide must be selected by examining eight hour running averages, calculated from hourly data and updated each hour. Each eight hour average so calculated will be assigned to the day on which it ends, that is, the first calculation period for any one day will be from 17:00 on the previous day to 01:00 on that day, the last calculation period for any one day will be the period from 16:00 to 24:00 on that day.
2.2
Additionally, the Air Quality Standards Regulations 2010 requires that Local Authorities must ensure that all necessary measures not entailing disproportionate costs are taken to ensure that concentrations of PM2.5, ozone, arsenic, cadmium, nickel and benzo(a)pyrene do not exceed the target values listed in Schedule 3 of the regulations.
3.0
3.1
3.2
4 3 5
7 1 8 9 15 14 13 10
11 12
Receptor Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15
Receptor Name Existing Residential Faade Existing Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade Proposed Residential Faade
3.3
The prevailing and strongest winds in the area as indicated by the wind roses below are from the south and west. A range of other wind directions are also experienced frequently in the area, with lighter NNE winds having the potential to cause poor dispersion. The Loftus weather station is the closest recognised observation stations to the development site, this data the most representative for the area.
The wind roses indicated that typically the prevailing winds are from the west and south which will significantly affect the pattern of long-term concentrations of pollutants surrounding the site. Lighter winds are experienced less frequently from the southeast through to the northwest. It is under these conditions when poorer dispersion may occur, potentially giving rise to higher short term concentrations.
4.0
4.1
4.2 4.3
4.4
The background levels in this area are predicted to be below the current air quality standards. Background NO2 concentrations alone form approximately 30% of the long term air quality standard in the site area. Background PM10 concentrations form approximately 31% of the long term air quality standard in the site area. Background levels are generally decreasing due to better engine technology and cleaner fuels. The average background figures for 2011 have been used in Section 5.2 to assess the cumulative concentrations at the receptor positions. Road traffic on the A67 is anticipated to be the principal source of pollutants concentrations over the development area. A small proportion will be produced from local traffic on Urlay Nook Road and adjacent housing estate roads. Traffic flow predictions are shown in Appendix II and demonstrate the additional affect of development traffic flows on the surrounding roads. This traffic flow information has been used in the CadnaA-APL prediction model for baseline 2012 and 2015. The proposed development will account for the following increases in traffic flows on the surrounding road network:
% Increase in flows due to development traffic 7.7 69.7
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
5.0
5.1
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.3
5.1.4
5.1.5
5.2
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.2.3 5.2.4
The predicted ground level concentrations are presented taking into account the background concentrations in the area as determined in Section 4.3. There are no Air Quality Management Areas within the vicinity of the proposed development. The following predictions are based on the results of the CadnaA-APL model runs under the scenario as described in each sub-section. Contour plots for each pollutant are also presented in Appendix I. The document Development Control: Planning for Air Quality (2010 Update) has been published by Environmental Protection UK (EPUK) and has been adopted as guidance for assessing the air quality impact of development schemes in England. The following table, taken from page 18 of the guidance document, details the impact significance for differing magnitudes of change.
5.2.8
The EPUK document also indicates that the sensitivity of these increases should also be examined with respect to the degree of headroom between the existing background concentrations of each pollutant and the air quality standard.
5.2.10 The following table illustrates the difference between the predicted annual background baseline and baseline including development for NO2 and 3 PM10 levels (g/m ) for the 2012 and 2015 scenarios. This gives a clear illustration of the contribution of development related traffic flow over predicted baseline for each year at the existing residential receptors.
Difference between baseline & development concentrations Baseline & Development 2012 NO2 Annual ug/m3 PM10 Annual ug/m3 Receptor 1 0.0 0.1 Receptor 2 0.1 0.0
Baseline & Development 2015 NO2 Annual ug/m3 PM10 Annual ug/m3
5.2.11 The following tables illustrate the contribution of the above predicted concentrations when compared against the current and predicted annual background NO2 and PM10 levels, including the proposed development, for 2012 and 2015; all of which are inclusive of other sources from the surrounding environment. This gives a clear indication of the contribution of both general increased traffic flows and that are associated with the proposed development on the current and predicted background concentration levels; assessed in accordance with the methodology outlined in Section 5.2.7.
In accordance with Development Control: Planning for Air Quality (2010 Update)
5.2.12 Section 4.3 demonstrates that all assessed air quality objectives are predicted to be comfortably achieved both currently and in 2012 and 2015. 5.2.13 Section 5.2.10 illustrates the difference between the predicted annual background baseline and baseline including development for annual NO2 and PM10 levels for the 2012 and 2015 scenarios. This gives a clear illustration of the contribution of development related traffic flow over predicted baseline for each year at the existing nearest residential receptors. Only negligible increases are predicted, therefore it is prudent to conclude that the development effect is imperceptible and, therefore, for all existing receptors is negligible. 5.2.14 In relation to Section 5.2.11, the addition of the development in this area will have a combination of effects on predicted emissions from the surrounding road network, ranging from predominantly Imperceivable to Small, in accordance with Development Control: Planning for Air Quality (2010 Update). Additionally, these predicted levels are comfortably below the air quality objectives and Section 5.2.10 clearly illustrates the negligible difference between the predicted annual background baseline and baseline including development for NO2 and PM10 levels (g/m3) for the 2012 and 2015 scenarios. 5.2.15 Following the completion of the development the worst-case traffic flows on surrounding roads are expected to increase by the levels shown in Section 4.8.
6.0
6.1
6.2
7.0
7.1 7.2
Residual Effects
Traffic emissions associated with the proposed development will have a neutral effect. Should the mitigation measures be followed during construction, it is considered that there will be a negligible impact on air quality.
8.0
8.1
Conclusions
A dispersion model has been performed for the potential impact of local road traffic pollution on a proposed residential development at Urlay View, Egglescliffe. The ground level receptor concentrations have been predicted using CadnaA-APL. In summary, the concentrations for all of the assessed criteria pollutants in this area did not exceed and fell significantly below the UK Air Quality Objectives for the baseline and baseline plus development scenarios. Additionally, the concentrations of all the pollutants examined fell within the health based guidelines issued by the World Health Organisation. The general national trend for air pollution is for pollutant concentrations to continue to reduce in future years due to technological improvements in engine design and fuel efficiencies. The levels of pollution measured by the Automated Urban and Rural Network confirm this downward trend. However, NO2 levels in city centres have often not shown this downward trend and have in fact increased in certain areas. Road traffic emissions associated with the proposed development will have a neutral impact on air quality. There are no perceived limitations to this assessment. As the detailed construction scheme is not available, it is not possible to undertake a detailed modelling assessment of the effect on air quality as a result of construction. Notwithstanding this, should best practice not be followed, construction has the potential to have a major significant adverse impact on air quality. From the findings of this air quality impact assessment, there should be no reason why planning permission should be restricted or refused on grounds of air quality.
8.2
8.3
8.7
9.0
References
DEFRA 2012a. National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs DEFRA 2012b. National Air Quality Information Archive, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs DEFRA 2007. The air quality strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. DEFRA 2010. Air Quality Standards Regulations 2010 EPUK 2010. Development Control: Planning for Air Quality (2010 Update) HA 2007. Highways Agency Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Volume 11 Environmental Assessment, HMSO, London, rev May 2007 DfT 2012. http://www.dft.gov.uk/matrix/ Database of Annual Average Daily Traffic Flows
Appendix I
4 3 5
7 1 8 9 15 14 13 11 12 10
Appendix II Concentration Contour Maps (All figures are referenced as g/m3) Baseline 2012 - NO2 Annual
2012 including planned development - NO2 18 exceedances per Year (based on an hourly mean)
2012 including planned development PM10 35 exceedances per Year (based on 24-hour mean)
2015 including planned development - NO2 18 exceedances per Year (based on an hourly mean)
2015 including planned development PM10 35 exceedances per Year (based on 24-hour mean)
Appendix III
Traffic Assessment - Traffic Counts Completion (incl. development flows) Estimated 2012 Figure 699 6372 Estimated 2013 Figure 706 6430 Estimated 2015 Figure 1212 6989 1440 1% HGV 3% HGV 0% HGV