Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Yield Stress Factor of Safety LIMIT STATE DESIGN An improved design philosophy to make allowances for the shortcomings in the allowable stress design was developed in the late 1970s and has been extensively corporated in design standards and codes formulated in all the developed countries. Although there are many variations between practices adopted in different countries the basic concept is broadly similar. The probability of operating conditions not reaching failure conditions forms the basis of Limit States Design adopted in all countries. Ultimate limit states are those catastrophic states, which require a larger reliability in order to reduce the probability of its occurrence to a very low level. Serviceability limit state refers to the limits on acceptable performance of the structure. LOAD AND LOAD COMBINATIONS To design a structure, it is analyzed first for its intended structural configuration and assumed sectional properties against various loads individually and in combination with each other in a way by which the structure may be subjected any time or at
Allowable stress =
Page 73
DESIGN PROCEDURES
DESIGN A MEMBER SUBJECTED HAVING A SPAN OF 3M WHICH IS FIXED @ BOTH ENDS LSM (As per IS: 800-2007) Let us take ISMB 200 @ 254 N/m Area = 3233mm 2 Depth (d) = 200mm Width of flange (b) = 100mm Thickness of the flange (tf) = 10.8mm, Thickness of the web (tw) = 5.7mm Step 1: Type of the Section
Step 2: Determination of Effective Length Leff = 0.65 x 3000 = 1950mm Step 3: Calculate the Slenderness Ratio
KL l x 1950 = = 23.43 r x rx 83.2 ISSN: 0975 6744| NOV 11 TO OCT 12 | Volume 2, Issue 1
Page 74
x =
fy f cc
y =
fy f cc
COMPARATIVE STUDY In this study we have compared Columns fixed at both ends, column fixed at one end and hinged at other, column pinned at both ends for a column length of 2m, 2.25m, 2.5m, 2.75m, 3m, 3.25m, 3.5m, 3.75m & 4m and also Graphical study has done for the Strength Vs Section and Strength Weight Ratio Vs Section. The Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3 show the comparative study of columns fixed at both ends of 2m, 3m, and 4m length. The Fig. 4, Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 show the comparison between the S/w ratio Vs Section for a length of 2m, 3m and 4m. Similarly the Fig.7 and Fig. 8 shows the section Vs the constants like stress reduction factor, and effective slenderness ratio. COMPARISON OF LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY VS DIFFERENT SECTIONS
Step 5: Calculation of
[ [
[ + (
[
1
2
2 0 .5
f cd =
f y / mo
Fig.1
+ 2 2
fy
0.5
=
mo
fy
mo
= 1 32.6 4
Pd = A f cd = 428.82kN
WSM (As per IS: 800-1984) Let us take ISMB 200 @ 254 N/m Area = 3233mm 2 Depth (d) = 200mm Width of flange (b) = 100mm Thickness of the flange (tf) = 10.8mm Thickness of the web (tw) = 5.7mm Step1: Determination of Effective Length Leff = 3000 x 0.65= 1950 Step 2: max = leff/rmin = 83.33 Step3: Calculation of Compressive Stress ac = 89.4 N/mm2 Fig.3 COMPARISON BETWEEN THE STRENGTH WEIGHT RATIO VS SECTION Fig.2
Page 75
Fig: 7
Fig: 5
Fig: 8 CONCLUSION 1. The load carrying capacity of the compression members as per IS 800-2007 is controlled by stress reduction factor, inclination of tension field stress in web and effective slenderness ratio. The slenderness ratio is inversely proportional to the stress reduction factor. The design compressive stress is directly proportional to stress reduction factor.
Fig: 6 From the chart it was found that the best fit curve for describing the behavior of steel sections with respect strength is two degree binomial. On comparison of the strength of sections calculated using old and new code, it was found that the strength increases with
Page 76
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2. In IS 800-1984 for the design of compression
member is controlled by slenderness ratio which is inversely proportional to the permissible stress in axial compression. 3. The percentage increase in load carrying capacity as per IS 800-1984 is marginally higher than IS 800-2007. The maximum increase was found to be a maximum of 5%. 4. The behavior of steel sections with respect to load carrying capacity follows two degree binomial curve for the design of sections as per both the codes. 5. The behavior of steel sections under strengthweight ratio is controlled by the weight per unit length. 6. The load carrying capacity of built-up columns using ISA sections for various back to back widths as well as for various lengths were found to vary for smaller sections and for higher sections the values become same irrespective of change in widths or lengths. REFERENCES 1.Arijit Guha and Dr.T.K. Bandyopandhya, Structural Member Design Based on Draft IS: 800 (Limit State Method), Insdags steel journal, Institute for steel development & Growth, Jan 2004, Volume5. 2. N. Pandian, Arul Jayachandran, S. Seetharamal, Structural Efficiencies of New Indian Wide Flanged Sections Compared With the Existing Rolled Sections, Insdags Steel Journal, Institute for steel development & Growth, Jan 2004, Volume5. 3.Rangachar Narayanan, V.Kalayanarman, etal Teaching Resource on Structural Steel Design Volume 1 of 3, Institute For Steel Development & Growth. 4.Indian Standard General Construction in SteelCode of Practice IS: 800-2007, December 2007. 5.Indian Standard General Construction in SteelCode of Practice IS: 800-1984.
Page 77