Applying models of change: an investigation into teachers perceptions of recent changes to teaching and learning English as a foreign language

in the United Arab Emirates schools

Mona Al Hammadi September 2010

This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of MA Education Leadership and Management, Roehampton University

Abstract

Abu Dhabi Education Council (ADEC) has established the Public-Private Partnership project (PPP) in the public schools since the year 2005. This project aims to work with teachers and principals in the public schools to improve the quality of teaching and learning and to increase students outcomes through inviting four international education contractors to manage the public schools. The contractors, referred to as companies, introduced several changes in the schools and the teaching subjects. The purpose of this study was to explore teachers perceptions of the recent changes to the English as a foreign language (EFL) teaching and learning. The study investigated the effectiveness of the change process adopted by the companies, from teachers perspectives. Appropriate qualitative methods exploiting semi-structured interviews and focus groups were the primary data collection tools for this study. The critical analysis of the data suggests that teachers encountered several problems with the recent changes to the EFL teaching and learning such as lack of rationale for change and lack of training and resources, which were factors that affected teachers implementation of the changes as well as the success of the changes to improve EFL teaching and learning. The results from the data analysis also demonstrated teachers understanding to the change process and to what should be done to improve the quality of the change process adopted by ADEC and the companies. Recommendations of this study included the need to encourage and support teachers innovations as well as the need to monitor and assess the implementation stage to evaluate the effectiveness of the new innovations in achieving the desired goals.

Key words: Educational change, organizational change, change models, EFL, Public-Private Partnership, teachers perceptions, qualitative methods.

Acknowledgements

My sincere thanks and utmost gratitude go to my supervisor Agnieszka Bates for providing me with assistance and guidance throughout the journey of preparing and writing the dissertation. I would also like to gratefully thank my lovely husband, Mohamed Asaad Taher, for the invaluable encouragement, help and support during my studies in London. Last, but never least, all gratitude and acknowledgments should go to my parents, brothers and sisters, and friends who supported and helped me while pursuing my MA degree.

Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction....................................................................................................5 Chapter 2: Literature Review...........................................................................................9
2.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................9 2.2 The meaning of change.................................................................................................................9 2.3 The importance of change........................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Change models............................................................................................................................ 12 2.4.1 Lewins (1947) three-step model....................................................................................... 13 2.4.2 Bolman and Deals (2003) reframing organizations..........................................................16 2.4.3 Senges (1999) dance of change........................................................................................ 21 2.4.3.1 The challenges of initiating...................................................................................22 2.4.3.2 The challenges of sustaining and transformation..................................................23 2.4.3.3 The challenges of redesigning and rethinking.......................................................24 2.5 The implications of change models for improving EFL teaching and learning in the UAE...... 26

Chapter 3: Research Methodology.............................................................................................29

3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................29 3.2 Social science..............................................................................................................................29 3.2.1 Positivism..........................................................................................................................30 3.2.2 Interpretivism....................................................................................................................32 3.3 Interviews...................................................................................................................................34 3.3.1 Semi-structured interviews...............................................................................................34 3.3.2 Open-ended questions...................................................................................................... 36 3.3.3 Focus groups.................................................................................................................... 36 3.3.4 Recording data................................................................................................................. 40 3.4 Research sample.........................................................................................................................40 3.5 Ethical considerations................................................................................................................41 3.6 Procedure...................................................................................................................................42 4

3.7 Data transcription..................................................................................................................... 43 3.8 Data analysis............................................................................................................................ 43

Chapter 4: Data Presentation and Analysis...........................................................................45

4.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................45 4.2 The problems with the most recent changes to TEFL in the UAE as perceived by EFL teachers.......................................................................................................................................... 46 4.2.1 Lack of rationale for change and its effects on the teachers implementing change.......46 4.2.2 Unclear role....................................................................................................................48 4.2.3 Poorly planned and designed curriculum.......................................................................50 4.2.4 Lack of resources...........................................................................................................52 4.2.5 Lack of training ............................................................................................................ 54 4.2.6 Cultural boundaries....................................................................................................... 56 4.2.7 Lack of monitoring and assessment...............................................................................58 4.2.8 Impact on students outcomes........................................................................................60 4.3 Teachers tacit models of effective change to TEFL.............................................................. 62 4.4 Conclusion...............................................................................................................................64

Chapter 5: Conclusion................................................................................................66
5.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................66 5.2 Critical evaluation of the work undertaken.............................................................................66 5.3 Summary of the main findings................................................................................................67 5.4 Recommendations...................................................................................................................69 5.5 Routes for future research.......................................................................................................70

Bibliography................................................................................................................................72 Appendix A: Permission Letter (Principal)...............................................................75 Appendix B: Permission Letter (Teacher).................................................................76 Appendix C: Interview Guiding Questions...............................................................77 Appendix D: First Interview Transcripts...................................................................78 Appendix E: Second Interview Transcripts...............................................................92
5

Chapter 1: Introduction
During my work as an English teacher in one of the girls public schools in Abu Dhabi, I realized that change was necessary in the English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom. After twelve years of English learning, many students graduate from high schools with poor English language skills. From my experience with grade nine, some of the students have difficulties in communicating in English and some of them can barely understand simple conversations. This could be due to the teaching methods previously used in English language learning. Many teachers in EFL classrooms use behaviorist approaches to teaching. Drilling, memorization, accuracy, grammar and translation are the central features of some English classrooms in the UAE. Since the establishment of Abu Dhabi Education Council (ADEC), fundamental changes have been introduced to the educational sector of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Its mission is to produce world-class learners who embody a strong sense of culture and heritage and are prepared to meet global challenges (Abu Dhabi Education Council, 2009). ADEC has introduced several changes in the public schools. One of its major projects is the Public Private Partnership (PPP) schools, where it invited four international education contractors (companies) to manage 30 public schools and to work with teachers and principals to improve the quality of instruction and to increase student achievement in government schools (Abu Dhabi Education Council, 2010). In spite of ADECs efforts to reform education, reports indicate that the education in the UAE remains the same as modest development was noticed even after the implementation of the PPP project. In the reputable local news paper, The National Ridge (2009) claims that despite these

extensive investments, education quality and achievement remain stagnant in the UAE, Qatar and throughout the Gulf. She also points out that there is a lack of educational research in the Gulf region which makes the education sector in the Gulf one of the most understudied sectors in the world (Ridge, 2009). The lack of educational research in the Gulf region motivated me to conduct a research about the educational reforms in the UAE. More specifically, there was an essential need to investigate the effectiveness of ADECs PPP project in the public schools of Abu Dhabi. Therefore, I was interested in investigating teachers perceptions of the recent changes introduced to teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL) simply because teachers are the implementers of these changes. This study is aimed at identifying the problems associated with the process of change initiated by the companies. The findings of this study will provide ADEC with valuable assistance to promote changes more effectively in the future. This study aims to answer the following questions: 1. Why is change needed: the rational for change 2. What are the main change models in management and leadership literature and how can they be evaluated? 3. What were the problems with the most recent changes to TEFL in the UAE? 4. What can we learn from change models in order to better promote and implement change in the TEFL context in the future? In order to answer these research questions I have designed my research based on the interpretivist research paradigm using qualitative research methods to collect the data. Semi7

structured interviews using focus groups were the primary data collection tools in this study. These tools encouraged teachers participation and enabled them to express their perceptions and share their experiences more openly and in a comfortable environment. In addition, focus group interviews allowed me to generate rich data that would answer my research questions. This dissertation is structured as follows. Chapter two presents a review of literature on the concept of change including its definition in different contexts and its importance in developing the educational systems that support the development of societies. This chapter also discusses the most important change models namely: Lewins (1947) three-step model, Bolman and Deals (2003) reframing organizations and Senges (1999) dance of change. Then, links between these change models and their ability to improve EFL teaching and learning in the UAE public schools are established. Chapter three discusses the methodological approach used in this study with a particular emphasis on the interpretivist paradigm and, therefore, the qualitative methods, which were deemed most appropriate for this research. It also provides justifications for the use of semistructured interviews using focus groups as the primary data collection tools, and discusses their advantages and limitations. Then, the research sample and ethical issues are discussed. The procedure for conducting the interviews and the methods used in the data transcription and analysis are outlined at the end of this chapter. Chapter four is concerned with the presentation and analysis of the data obtained. Two major themes emerged after transcribing the data collected from the interviews. The first theme presents the problems that teachers had with the recent changes to TEFL and the second theme reflects on teachers understanding of the change models. The data gathered produced

predicted results such as the lack of training required to prepare the teachers for the implementation of change. The data also indicated surprising results such as the manipulation of students grades by one of the companies in order to demonstrate positive change and present it to ADEC. The results are then analyzed and linked to the literature review discussed in chapter two. The conclusion and recommendations chapter evaluates the work undertaken in terms of the effectiveness of the research methodology and the data collection tools in answering the research questions. It also summarizes the main findings and draws recommendations to ADEC on how to successfully promote change to classrooms in the future. Finally, other recommendations are presented as areas of potential further research.

Chapter 2: Literature Review

9

2.1 Introduction This study aims to explore teachers perceptions of the recent changes to EFL teaching and learning as well as to provide ADEC with suggestions on how to promote changes more effectively in the future. In order to understand change and its processes, first, this chapter articulates the meaning of change and its importance. Second it discusses the main three change models: Lewins (1947) three-step model; Bolman and Deals (2003) reframing organizations; and Senges (1999) dance of change. Analyzing these models enabled me to develop understanding of different change processes and their challenges from different perspectives. For instance, both Lewins (1947) and Bolman and Deals(2003) change models focus on changing behavior, while Senges (1999) model aspires to more profound change that entails a shift in thinking. 2.2 The meaning of change Change, in the general context, whether imposed or sought for, is associated with the feelings of "loss, anxiety, and struggle" (Marris, 1975, in Fullan, 1982, p. 25). Fullan and Hargreaves (1991) describe change as:
A journey of unknown destination, where problems are our friends, where seeking assistance is a sign of strength, where simultaneous top-down bottom-up initiatives merge, where collegiality and individualism co-exist in productive tension (cited in Fullan, 1993, p. viii).

Change could be top-down, which denotes change introduced by agents who are in top hierarchical positions in an organization, or bottom-up, where the employees have the opportunity to create and implement innovations that could help them achieve their goals.

10

However, Fullan (2007) suggests that it does not matter where change comes from as both directions could fail. What matters the most is the quality of the change process and what happens within it. Change could carry different meanings for different people due to its subjective nature; depending on the outcomes, educational change can be viewed as an achievement, success and professional growth, or it can lead to negative feelings such as anxiety and loss (Fullan, 1982). Van de Ven and Poole (1995) define change as the observation of difference over time in one or more dimensions of entity (cited in Kezar, 2001, p.12). Similarly, the Oxford Dictionary defines the verb to change as to make or become different (Oxford Dictionaries, 2010). This could mean that when we change something we make it look, act, think or sound different than it used to be. Senge (1999) suggests that change has several meanings and sometimes those meanings are contradictory. For example, leaders might view change as the ability to create new approaches to increase their organizations productivity, while employees might view change as a source of threat and problems. Senge (1999) claims that change could be external (customers, technology or social and political environment) or internal (strategies, practices or views), and the concern is about the relationship between external and internal changes. Change could also mean top-down programs such as reforming, reorganizing and many other res (Senge, 1999). In regard to organizational change, Burnes (1996) emphasizes that organizational change refers to understanding alterations within organizations at the broadest level among individuals, groups, and at the collective level across the entire organization (cited in Kezar, 2001, p. 12). On the other hand, Morgan (1998) views the organization as an open system in constant interaction with its environment, transforming inputs into outputs as a means of creating the conditions necessary for

11

survival, and believes that changes in the environment are viewed as presenting challenges to which the organization must respond (p. 215). Educational change in practice, associated with the implementation of new educational policy or program, is a multidimensional process involving at least three dimensions or elements, namely: the change in materials through the use of revised or sometime new materials; the change in teaching strategies by adopting new teaching approaches and activities; and the change of beliefs, assumptions and theories (Fullan, 1982). 2.3 The importance of change There are several reasons why educational change is crucial. Sikes (1992) suggests that a fundamental purpose of education is to prepare young people for life in society, and since societies throughout the world are constantly changing and developing, education can also be expected to change (p. 36). In addition, Hargreaves (2005) asserts that educational change is needed to prepare students for the rapid social, political, economical and technological growth. He adds: societies increasingly require the full range of human abilities potentially available to it, development strategies that build the capacities of individuals and institutions are ever more necessary (pp. 362-363). Moreover, Glaser (1990) claims that the 21st century requires schools to shift from a selective mode where learning conditions and approaches for success are limited, to an adaptive mode in which the educational environment can provide for a range of opportunities for success (in Hargreaves, 2005, p. 363). Therefore, in rapidly growing developing countries such as the UAE, it is important to create productive schools that could prepare Emirati students to play a significant role in the society.

12

Educational change is taking place in the UAE and new programs have been developed to replace the old ones. In her article in the reputable local newspaper The National, Ridge (2009) reported that the UAE and Qatar both have been particularly active in investing in programs to improve the quality of public education. However, In theory, the purpose of educational change is presumably to help schools accomplish their goals more effectively by replacing some programs or practices with better ones (Fullan, 1982, p. 11). However, it is important to note that not all new programs are successful as emphasized by Fullan (2007), who argues that the introduction of new programs and practices does not always make a difference or help schools accomplish their goals, and in some cases, it can make things even worse. Whether or not change initiatives are deemed to be successful depends, to a large degree on the processes of change, which are discussed in the next section. 2.4 Change models There are numerous theoretical models of change. Each of these models attempts to describe the process of the organizational change. The models of change discussed in this section are Lewins (1947) three-step model; Bolman and Deals (2003) reframing organizations; and Senges (1999) dance of change. Both Lewins (1947) and Bolman and Deals (2003) models focus on change behavior, while Senges (1999) model views organizational change as profound change. In addition, Senge (1999) argues that creating new strategies and practices are important, but what is more important is to change thinking. The three models of change are discussed below. 2.4.1 Lewins (1947) three-step model Social scientist Kurt Lewin (1947) introduced the three-step change model which is referred to as Lewins key contribution to organizational change (Burnes, 2004). He views change as a process
13

rather than an event, and he argues that a successful change process contains three steps namely: unfreezing, movement and refreezing (Burnes, 2004). The unfreezing step is crucial for understanding and recognizing the importance of change. This step involves unfreezing the current situation by reducing those forces which maintain behaviour in its present form (Mullins, 1999, p. 823). Lewin (1951) conceived of change as modification of those forces keeping a systems behaviour stable (Cummings and Worley, 2009, p. 23). There are two groups of forces that affect behavioural change. These are restraining forces resisting change and seeking to maintain the status of quo and driving forces promoting and enforcing change. When both sets of forces are about equal, current behaviours are maintained in what Lewin termed a state of quasi-stationary equilibrium (Cummings and Worley, 2009, p. 23). In order for change to take place, the equilibrium or the status of quo should be destabilized. If the restraining forces are more or equal to the driving forces, change will not happen and resistance will occur. Therefore, it is important to either increase the driving forces or decrease the restraining forces for change to happen (Change-Management-Coach.com, 2010). Schein (1996) identifies three processes to achieve the unfreezing step successfully: disconfirmation; induction of guilt and survival anxiety; and creation of psychological safety; each of which has to be present to some degree for readiness and motivation to change to be generated (Schein, 1996, p.60). The disconfirmation process is one of the main driving forces. It introduces information that shows the differences between the current behavior of the organization members and the behavior desired by the reformers. Some individuals might deny and ignore the disconfirming information. Thus, it is important stimulate the feeling of guilt and survival anxiety in order for individuals to start thinking that if they did not accept change, they will not achieve their goals and desires (Schein, 1996). For instance, teachers need to understand and should agree
14

that the changes introduced are the only solution to improve EFL teaching and improve students outcomes. Schein (1996) suggests that there is a type of anxiety that prevents individuals from accepting change, which is called learning anxiety (p. 60). Learning anxiety is experienced when individuals feel that if they accept change, they will prove to themselves and to others that they were wrong and incompetent, and therefore, they should change. Thus, learning anxiety is viewed as a fundamental restraining force that leads individuals to feel insecure and accordingly, resist change. Therefore, dealing with the learning anxiety is an important element to push change forward (Schein, 1996). Schein (1996) argues that unless sufficient psychological safety is created, the disconfirming information will be denied or in other ways defended against, no survival anxiety will be felt, and consequently, no change will take place (p. 61). In sum, Schein (1996) argues that in order for people to accept change and new information, it is important that they feel safe and secure and less threatened by change. Once this state of acceptance has been secured, people in the organization are ready for the next step identified by Lewin (1947), as the moving step. In the course of the moving stage, groups or individuals start turning away from their old ineffective practices and behaviors to new effective ones. This step involves intervening in the system to develop new behaviours, values, and attitudes through changes in organizational structure and processes (Cummings and Worley, 2009, p. 24). This stage is often the hardest step as people involved would feel unsure and afraid to change even when they agree and understand that change is important. Therefore, support is essential in this stage. It increases peoples confidence and encouragement to change (Change-Management-Coach.com, 2010). In addition,

15

Lewin (1947) suggests that reinforcement and motivation are the key elements to ensure the consistency of change (cited in Burnes, 2004). Refreezing is the last step of Lewins three-step change model. Refreezing is a necessary step to ensure that the new adopted behaviors are stabilized (Burnes, 2004). Change is more likely to be short-lived if this step is not accomplished (Kritsonis, 2005). In this stage, new behaviours must be... congruent with the rest of the behaviour and personality of the learner or it will simply set off new rounds of disconfirmation (Schein, 1996, p. 63). In other words, if people involved in change did not integrate the new behaviors and practices in their work routine, they are more likely to retrieve their old behavior. Cummings and Worley (2009) suggest that, in order to accomplish refreezing, organizations must change their culture, structure, practices and rewards system. Over the years, Lewins three-step model of change has greatly contributed to organizational and social development, but it has also faced several criticisms (Burnes, 2004; Kanter et al, 1992). One of the criticisms is that his planned approach to change was viewed to be too simplistic and mechanistic for organizations that are rapidly and consistently changing (Burnes, 2004). Furthermore, many have argued that for such changing organizations the refreezing step cannot be achieved (Burnes, 2004). Besides, Kanter et al (1992) claim that organizations are never frozen, much less refrozen, but are fluid entities with many personalities (cited in Burnes, 2004, p. 989). Defending Lewins model, Burnes (2004) argues that when Lewin wrote refreezing, he referred to preventing individuals and groups from regressing to their old behaviours (p. 993). Others have criticized Lewins model for not being able to incorporate radical, transformational change, and for the fact that his model is only relevant to incremental and isolated change projects (Dawson, 1994 cited in Burnes, 2004). However, Dickens and Wathins (1999) explain that
16

Lewins model was concerned with changing individuals, groups or organizations behavior, rather than promoting transformational change that is only appropriate in situations that require major structural change (cited in Burnes, 2004, pp. 993-994). The limiting focus of Lewins model on behavior, rather than thinking, and the freezing metaphor, which firmly grounds the model in the observable, external, physical reality, have been surpassed in the model of reframing organizations, which is discussed next. 2.4.2 Bolman and Deals (2003) reframing organizations The simple, linear process of change consisting of unfreezing, moving and refreezing becomes much more complex as presented by Bolman and Deal (2003). Through studying major organizational thoughts, Bolman and Deal (2003) identify four perspectives which are labeled as frames. The four frames are aimed to help leaders and managers understand their organizations. For Bolman and Deal (2003), a frame is like a mental map, which is defined as a set of ideas or assumptions you carry in your head [that] helps you to understand and negotiate a particular territory (p. 12). In this context a territory here means whatever individuals are interested in such as a particular sport, art or subject. The four frames, namely: structural, human resource, political and symbolic, have their origins in thinking presented in a range of social sciences, especially from sociology, psychology, political science and anthropology. Each frame enables a different view of the organization. Successful managers are those who reframe until they understand the situation at hand. They do this by using more than one frame, or perspectives, to develop both a diagnosis of what they are up against and strategies for moving forward (Bolman and Deal, 2003, p. 15). Bolman and Deal (2003) contend that organizational change is a multiframe undertaking (p. 370). They also suggest that change rationally conceived usually fails (p. 369). When some
17

managers focus on changing one or two frames while ignoring the other frames, they fail to change anything. For instance, managers who promote changes to the formal structure of the organization might find out that people are not ready to play their new roles and take their new responsibilities. Therefore, it is important to consider the four frames while planning for change. The structural frame is concerned about goals, assigning roles and defining relationships. Organizations assign roles and responsibilities to their employees and they would create rules, policies and hierarchies to manage different activities into a unified strategy. Bolman and Deal (2003) assert that structure confers clarity, predictability, and security (p. 374). When individuals understand their positions and responsibilities as well as others, they will understand who is in charge, when and over what. When change is made to the organizational structure, it destabilizes the current arrangements causing ambiguity and confusion as people might not understand their new responsibilities as well as others, and might become unsure about their duties, how to relate to others, and who has authority to decide what (Bolman and Deal, 2003, pp. 375-376). Bolman and Deal (2003) suggest that in order to overcome such a difficulty, change efforts must expect and predict structural issues and, therefore, reassign roles and relationships. The human resource frame deals with the human aspect of the organization. It views the organization as an extended family formulated by individuals with feelings, prejudices, skills, and weaknesses. Those individuals have the ability to learn and to stand for their old practices and beliefs. Therefore, the main challenge for the organization is to adopt and direct those individuals so that they could accomplish their jobs while feeling good and satisfied. Some change initiatives stumble because they ignore developing individuals who are involved in change. People tend to resist change because it is sometimes difficult and threatening. According to Bolman and Deal (2003), Changes in routine practice and procedure undermine existing knowledge and skills, and
18

they undercut peoples ability to perform with confidence and success (p. 373). When people lack the knowledge and skills needed to implement changes successfully, they tend to feel lost and anxious. Thus, they resist change and prefer their old practices. If people were forced to implement change, the outcomes could be disappointing. Change reformers need to develop and prepare individuals involved in change if they want it to be implemented successfully. According to Bolman and Deal (2003) Training, psychological support, and participation, all increase the likelihood that people will understand and feel comfortable with the new methods (p. 373). Developing peoples understanding, knowledge and skills is essential to increase their confidence and ability to implement change effectively. The political frame views the organization as a jungle. Individuals within the organization have different goals and interests and they tend to compete for possessing power and resources. The fact that the members of any organization have various goals and interests might lead to conflicts. Bolman and Deal (2003) suggest that in politics, conflict is viewed as a natural feature of the organizations, and that it is managed through processes of negotiation and bargaining, where settlements and agreements can be hammered out. Change itself could also cause conflicts as it always creates division and conflict among competing interest groups (Bolman and Deal, 2003, p. 378). As change emerges, coalitions of supporters, opponents and those who are in between form. They fight in a battle where there are winners and losers. The winner in this conflict is the coalition that posses power and resources (Bolman and Deal, 2003). However, Bolman and Deal (2003) assume that often, the status quo prevails and change agents lose (p. 377). If conflicts are ignored, they could lead to disasters and change failures. In order for change to be successful, Bolman and Deal (2003) suggest that it is important to create areas with roles, rules and referees to create opportunities for the diverse conflict groups to negotiate and reach shared agreements.
19

The symbolic frame considers organizations as tribes or theatres. The organization is seen as a culture driven by myths, stories, metaphors and heroes of all which serve to promote a sense of clarity and direction (Bolman and Deal, 2003). It views individuals as actors who play their roles in the organizational drama while audiences from impressions form what is seen onstage (Bolman and Deal, 2003, p. 15). Thus, activities and events carry meaning, which individuals may construct differently (Bolman and Deal, 2003). It is important to note that change creates loss of meaning and purpose. According to Bolman and Deal (2003) any significant change in an organization triggers two conflicting responses. The first is to keep things as they were ... [and] the second is to ignore the loss and rush busily into the future (p. 380). People are attached to symbols or symbolic activities regardless if they were positive or negative, and when people are separated from these attachments, they face the difficulty of leaving their past and moving forward (Bolman and Deal, 2003). For this reason, Bolman and Deal (2003) suggest that creating transitional rituals is a very important factor for successful change. This enables people to gradually let go of their past, deal with the present and move to the future. Leaders need to rely on their organizations culture and traditions in order to build a shared culture and values that creates meaning for people (Bolman and Deal, 2003). As mentioned above, to achieve a successful change, leaders need to view their organizations from multiple dimensions. However, leaders tend to choose the frame that is most important to them, and they view their organizations from that frame. Bolman and Deal (1999) advocate that leaders need to consider other frames that allow multiple ways of viewing the organization. While their model of the change process highlights the complex nature of change as it is played out at four different levels of organizational activities, using the concept of frames as a way to view
20

the organizations could ground this model into the observable and visible activities, which is similar to Lewins model. Besides, frames could limit what individuals can see. For instance, when we look at a frame, we normally focus on the picture inside and ignore everything else outside the frame. The four-frame model (structural, human resources, political and symbolic) tend to focus on the internal factors that leaders need to consider while planning for change. However, there are some external factors such as the economy, society and government plans and demands that could have a huge impact on change. An alternative model that is concerned about shifting not only individuals behavior but also their thinking is the dance of change. 2.4.3 Senges (1999) dance of change The dance of change considers a particular type of organizational change in which combines inner shifts in peoples values, aspirations, and behaviors with outer shifts in processes, strategies, practices and systems (Senge, 1999, p. 15). This type of change is called profound change. Profound change provides opportunities for learning because the organization does not change by itself. However, it builds its capacity for doing things in a new wayindeed, it builds capacity for ongoing change (Senge, 1999, p. 15). Change does not only requires creating new strategies, practices and systems, but it also requires fundamental shift in thinking (Senge, 1999, p. 10). Organizations are results of the way people think within them and changing the organization requires allowing people to change the way they think (Senge, 1999). Therefore, educational reform in the UAE should not only aim to create new policies, practices and systems, but it should also aim to change teachers thinking and develop their capacity to learn in order to achieve sustainable effective change.

21

Shifting peoples values and opinions does not happen through explicit training or authority. However, it requires developing a learning organization that allows people to participant and get involved in different change activities (Senge, 1999). Senge (1999) argues that change driven by learning tends to be more sustained and effective than change driven by authority. Thus, it is important to provide the people with the opportunity to plan, design, initiate and implement small projects. Through experimenting small projects people could gain new experiences and learn from their success and failure through discussing and sharing their experiences with others. This could build a learning organization with committed people who share similar values and aspirations. At any stages of profound change there are external and internal challenges. It is important that leaders understand the growth processes and the forces that support these processes. Meanwhile, they also need to understand the challenges and the obstacles that hinder their organizations growth, and develop strategies that help them to deal with these challenges (Senge, 1999). Senge (1999) asserts that we need to appreciate the dance of change, the inevitable interplay between growth processes and limiting processes (p. 10). Senge (1999) identifies several challenges that hinder and limit any profound change process. The challenges are classified under three categories namely: challenges of initiating, challenges of sustaining momentum, and challenges of redesigning and rethinking. Those challenges are predictable and they occur as natural counter pressures to generating change (p. 26). The challenges reflect individuals assumptions and practices, so it is important to address them and deal with them in order to achieve sustainable profound change (Senge, 1999). To follow is a discussion of some of the challenges that leaders need to consider through the process of profound change.

22

2.4.3.1 The challenges of initiating As soon as change is introduced, the reformers encounter the challenges of initiating. Those challenges prevent change from happening as they develop in the early process of change (Senge, 1999). One of these challenges occurs when people start struggling with the new practices and knowledge. Senge (1999) suggest that leaders need to develop individuals capacity to meet change demands and provide them with quality coaching, guidance, and support that are essential to overcome this challenge (p.103). One way to overcome this challenge is to understand the type of help individuals need and find reliable and capable consults and coaches who could provide the right help at the right time (Senge, 1999). In todays business people are so overloaded that they are hesitant to engage in anything new, and convincing them to take part in the change initiative would be challenging (Senge, 1999). People need to be convinced of the importance of the initiatives. They will not put any time or effort in something that they think is not relevant or important. Senge (1999) proposes that creating clear and convincing reasons for change initiatives could help increase peoples commitment to change. It is essential that people understand their organization and its needs. Once they understand how changes could bring improvement and development to their organization, they will be more motivated and committed to achieve the organizations goals. 2.4.3.2 The challenges of sustaining and transformation Achieving sustainable change that could last for long periods of time could be problematic for some organizations. One of the challenges that prevent organizations from achieving sustainable profound change is the measurement problems (Senge, 1999). These problems occur when the new innovations do not meet the organizations expectations or when the traditional measurement tools
23

dont calibrate the reformers efforts. Senge (1999) argues that if the leaders try to defend their new innovations by proving that the traditional measurements are incompetent, they may lose accountability and credibility, and if they try to meet those traditional measurements they may undermine the new innovations. Therefore, assessing and measuring new innovations tend to be complex and ambiguous (Senge, 1999). Achieving expected results could sometimes be difficult and challenging. Senge (1999) claims that people who are involved in change struggle between adapting the new practices and achieving concrete results. The lack of concrete results may lead some people to think that the new innovation is not working (Senge, 1999). However, some practices takes longer time than expected to be properly implemented, which could sometimes negatively affect the emergence of the expected outcomes (Senge, 1999). Therefore, Senge suggests that leaders need to plan for a realistic time horizon for realizing the benefits of that practice (p. 287). This means that the change reformers need to carefully plan for change and allow for some positive results to emerge at the early stage of the change process, as it increases individuals motivation and commitment to the change initiatives. Assessing the progress of the new innovations in practice is very important. Senge (1999) assets that learning to assess the consequences of significant change initiatives is a complex new territory, often neglected by leaders of those initiatives (p. 289). Therefore, leaders need to learn how to effectively assess the progress of the new innovations in practice. However, they also need to understand that the aim of assessments is not only to evaluate the new innovations but also to learn from their experiences as Senge argues that the key shift is to bring measurement and

24

assessment into the service of the learners, rather than have it feared as a tool for outside evaluators (p. 289). 2.4.3.3 The challenges of redesigning and rethinking After dealing with the challenges of sustaining momentum change reformers will face another set of problems and challenges. Senge (1999) asserts that these challenges tend to be frustrating and enervating as leaders or internal networks cannot deal with them alone because they need imaginative, courageous executive leadership (p. 360). One of these challenges is the challenges of rethinking and redesigning the strategy and purpose of the change initiatives. They occur in different ways for different leaders. Rethinking the strategies often lies on the top management leaving other employees with no space to question or rethink the organizations strategy and purpose. However, Senge (1999) argues that allowing people to deeply question the purpose and the strategies is loaded with challenges because it opens the door to a traditionally closed inner sanctum of top management (p. 488). Involving people from different organizational levels is important as it allows for the emergence of new and unexpected ideas that the top management might not think about alone. Senge (1999) suggests that involving people throughout the organization does not mean that top management abdicates (p. 498). However, they could maintain responsibility for strategic direction, but do so by remaining open to ideas from throughout the enterprise (p. 498). In addition, I believe that giving individuals the opportunity to participate in rethinking the strategy and the purpose of the new initiatives could increase their commitment and motivation and could also improve their performance.

25

Creating profound change lies on dealing with different challenges of initiating, sustaining, and redesigning. Senge (1999) claims that different change initiatives may face different challenges and that there are other unanticipated challenges that reformers may encounter in the process of profound change. Recognizing and understanding these challenges help building strong leadership capacity that could achieve suitable profound change.

2.5 The implications of change models for improving EFL teaching and learning in the UAE From Senges (1999) model, we learn that in order to bring change to EFL teaching and learning in the UAE it is important to build teachers capacities to implement the changes successfully. Training and guiding EFL teachers might not be enough to achieve suitable and effective change. Teachers need to learn how to play an effective role in bring change to their classrooms as well as the school. Any profound change could encounter many challenges. Successful leaders are those how identify these challenges and deal with them. In addition, in order to achieve sustained profound change is important that teachers change the way they think because deep, sustained change does not only require adopting new behaviors and practices, but it also requires a shift in thinking. EFL teachers need to feel safe, secure, and less threatened by the new initiatives. The unfreezing step in Lewins three-step model is a very crucial step in any change effort. Schein (1996) made great contribution in developing this step. We could learn from her contribution that change emerges when EFL teachers start building the feeling of guilt and survival anxiety. It is when the EFL teachers start to believe that change could help them achieve their goals and improve their

26

students outcomes. Furthermore, fear and anxiety are fundamental restraining forces to change. Thus, it is important to address these feelings and deal with them at the very beginning of the change process. The unfreezing is the first step to move change successfully forward. It is where EFL teachers start feeling safe and secure and understand the importance of change. On a practical level, I would argue that leaders need to think about providing support which could help to build, what Schein (1996) refers to as sufficient psychological safety (p. 61) that would counterbalance the learning anxiety. This could encompass training, provision of sufficient resources, regular communication with teachers and, above all, a culture of dialogue and openness. Viewing the organization from one angle could limit what leaders can see. Bolman and Deals (2003) reframing organization model addresses the importance of considering multiple frames in organizational change. From the reframing model, we learn that in order to bring successful change to EFL subject, we need to consider not only changing materials, practices or the curriculum, but we need to consider all of these aspects. For instance, when the reformers introduce change to the EFL curriculum they need to consider several issues. First, they need to understand that adopting the new curriculum would be a difficult task for some teachers who were attached to the old curriculum (symbolic frame). Second, they need to train the teachers on how to effectively use the new curriculum (human resource frame). Similarly, Fullan (2007) argues that change should not be viewed as a single entity, but it is multidirectional. He also suggests that change in classrooms is associated with three dimensions, which encompass practices, materials and pedagogy; in order to achieve successful change, Fullan argues, it is important to articulate the three dimensions. For instance, if EFL teachers are required to adopt new teaching methods, they will need to change the type of strategies and activities they are using and adopt new materials that could facilitate their new practices. Ignoring or missing one of the dimensions could cause change failure.
27

Consequently, there is no one right change model. Each change model might be effective in some particular change satiations but not all. Successful leaders are those who understand change processes and know when to adopt the right change model at the right time. Fullan (2007) asserts that it does not matter what the change is or where is it coming from; what matters is the process of change. In other words, the success of change depends on what happens in the process of change. Finally, of utmost importance is for leaders to remember that change models are just models, inasmuch as they represent real life. However, whether or not the models are helpful in the everyday practice of leaders introducing and implementing change, will depend on the particular circumstances of particular teachers, who, as Fullan (2007) points out, are at the grass roots of change. The circumstances of these people, UAE teachers of English as a Foreign Language, are presented in the Data Analysis Chapter of this dissertation.

28

Chapter 3: Research Methodology

3.1 Introduction The primary purpose of this study is to explore EFL teachers perceptions regarding the changes introduced to the EFL teaching and learning in Abu Dhabi public schools. This chapter articulates and justifies research methodology followed in this study. This study adopted the Interprevitism paradigm using qualitative data collection tools. Unlike the positivism quantitative research methods, qualitative research allows the researcher to collect in-depth data which served the aim of this study. This chapter discusses the theory underpinning social research and both the positivism and Interprevitism research paradigms, their advantages and limitations. Then it analyzed the advantages and limitations of conducting semi-structured interviews using focus groups, which were the primary data collection tools in this study. Next, research sample and ethical issues are discussed. Finally, the procedure of conducting the interviews and the methods used for the data transcriptions and analysis are outlined. 3.2 Social science As human characteristics are unique and complex, there was a need for special science to study and explore the social aspects of human lives. Social science was developed to study the interaction between individuals and groups in societies as well as their opinions and attitudes (Neuman, 2006). It is as important as any other types of sciences such as the physical and natural sciences. The physical science studies the nature of the world while the social science studies the social life of people who live in this world. Both require scientific methods to obtain knowledge, understanding
29

and results (Trigg, 2001). However human beings are qualitatively different from the objects of study in the natural sciences such as stars, planets and rocks (Neuman, 2006, p. 80). For this reason Hayek (1952) believed that social science is subjective because its subject matter is human opinions and attitudes which could only be identified through introspection (cited in Rudner, 1954, p. 164). Social researchers have identified several research paradigms. Neuman (2006) suggests that research paradigms are different approaches to research that enable the researchers to view the world from different angles. He defined paradigm as A general organizing framework for theory and research that includes basic assumptions, key issues, models of quality research and methods for seeking answers (Neuman, 2006, p. 81). There are two common and major approaches to social research: positivism and interpretivism. Each approach is associated with different traditions in social theory and diverse research techniques (Neuman, 2006, p. 81). 3.2.1 Positivism Positivism is a very old research approach that has been widely used in social science since the nineteenth century (Neuman, 2006, p. 81). Positivism in science including social science is concerned about objective reality that we could observe and experience (Gray, 2009). It suggests that through linking events and observations to general laws, we could provide explanations to these events (Robson, 2002). Therefore, this approach views knowledge as objects or facts that could be observed or experienced and it rejects any invisible or theoretical entities (Robson, 2002). In this approach, both the social and natural scientists use the same research approach. They prefer quantitative data that could be obtained from experiments, measurements or surveys and they analyze these data to test their hypotheses (Neuman, 2006).

30

In social science, this approach is used to identify and document universal casual laws of human behavior (p. 82). It is concerned about human behavior rather that human perceptions, beliefs and values. Positivists believe that social pressure and situations are external forces that affect and shape all human behaviors and actions. They also believe that people respond to external forces that are as real as physical forces on objects which is called mechanical model of man and through observing these forces, we could provide explanations of human behaviors (Nueman, 2006, p. 83). Although positivism has been widely used in natural sciences, the majority of experts in the educational field have criticized its use in educational and social research. Srantakos (1998) argues that people are not only natural elements, they are also social personas, acting individuals with their own wishes, perceptions and interests (cited in Robson, 2006, p. 23). Similarly, Cohen, Manion and Morrison (2000) argue that one of the limitations of positivism is that it views human behavior as passive, essentially determined and controlled, thereby, ignoring intentions, individualism and freedom (p. 19). Moreover, anti-positivists argue that in order to explain human behaviors we need to understand their own interpretations of the world around them. The researcher then should look inside those people rather than observing them from distance. Therefore, social science is viewed as a subjective rather than an objective science (Cohen et al, 2000). In other words, human behaviors are driven by both external and internal forces. In order to explain and understand particular behaviors we should not only study and observe the external forces, however, we also need to understand the internal forces such as individuals opinions, beliefs and values. This research is concerned about providing deep understanding of teachers perceptions, opinions and experiences regarding the changes introduced to the EFL subject. Therefore, the positivist
31

approach would not be appropriate for this study. On the other hand, an alternative research paradigm for positivism will be used in this study, which is interpretivism. 3.2.2 Interpretivism Interpretivism, in contrast to positivism, suggests that human behaviors are driven by their own interests and motives as well as their understanding of their own environment. Robson (2002) argues that People, unlike the objects of the natural world, are conscious, purposive actors who have ideas about their world and attach meaning to what is going on around them (Robson, 2002, p. 24). Similarly, Weber (1981), a German sociologist, suggests that we need to study and understand individuals inner motives and needs that led them to do certain actions or behave in a particular way (cited in Neuman, 2006). The main objective for the interpretive researchers is to develop a deep understanding of their participants lives and to find out how people construct meaning in their natural context (Neuman, 2006). Thus, Reality is represented thought the eyes of participants; reality is what people think and believe (Robson, 2002, p. 25). Therefore, knowledge is not only based on observable phenomena, but also on invisible entities such as values and beliefs (Cohen et al, 2000). Although interpretive approach provides deep understanding of peoples perceptions in their social context, the results obtained in this approach are criticized in terms of their reliability, validity and generalization (Kelliher, 2005). In terms of generalization, Carr and Kemmis (1986) contend that the interpretive approach failed to produce wide-ranging generalizations, or to provide objective standards for verifying or refuting theoretical accounts (p. 94). While criticizing this approach, Layder (1994) argues that one of the
32

limitations of the interpretive approach is that it ignores the power of the external forces that could affect individuals behaviors. He adds that, just as the positivistic approach is criticized for neglecting internal forces, so the interpretive approach is criticized for neglecting external forces (cited in Cohen et al, 2000). Generalizing results was not sought for in this research. This research is a small-scale study designed to explore and understand EFL teachers perceptions and experiences regarding the changes introduced to the EFL teaching and learning in Abu Dhabi. Thus, interpretive approach was thought to be the most appropriate research paradigm for this study. Interpretive researchers use qualitative research methods such as participant observations and deep interviews which allow the researcher to obtain multiple perspectives (Robson, 2002). Qualitative methods enable the researcher to investigate particular issues in depth and detail (Patton, 1990, p. 13). In addition, qualitative research takes place in natural settings which allows the researcher to be closer to the field he/she is researching (Creswell, 2003, p. 181). This could deepen the researchers understanding about the participants experiences and their relations with the setting (Creswell, 2003). In qualitative research, interviews can be the primary or the only method in a study (Robson, 2002). Thus, interviews were the primary data collection tool in this study. Miller and Glassner (2004) suggest that Those of us who aim to understand and document others understandings choose qualitative interviewing because it provides us with a means for exploring the points of view of our research subjects (p. 127). Although observations are very useful research methods that could help the researcher observe participants in their natural settings, they could be very limited in providing understanding of what is going on in

33

participants minds. Interviews, on the other hand, could be the gate to participants minds. They allow the researcher to speak directly to the participants and ask them particular questions regarding their feelings, thoughts, values and experiences. 3.3 Interviews Interviews are a natural means of extracting information where information results from the interaction between the interviewer and the participants (Holstein & Gubrium, 2004, p. 140). Through this interaction both participants [interviewer and interviewee] create and construct narrative versions of the social world (Miller and Glassner, 2004, p. 125). The data generated from interviews give the researcher an authentic insight into peoples experiences (Silverman, 2001, cited in Miller and Glassner, 2004, p. 126). 3.3.1 Semi-structured interviews There are several types of interviews such as structured, semi-structured and unstructured interviews. Choosing the appropriate type depends on the research aims and questions (Gray, 2004). Semi-structured interviews using open-ended questions were used in this study as a primary data collection tool. This type of interviews offers great flexibility for both the researcher and the respondents (Robson, 2002). Predetermined questions can be used in both semi-structured and structured interviews. However, in semi-structure interviews the interviewer has the flexibility to change the question wording, omit inappropriate questions with any particular interviewee as well as to add additional questions while interviewing (Robson, 2002). There are several advantages of using semi-structured interviews. One of the advantages is that they allow the participants to expand their answers and elaborate on their thoughts and opinions. In addition, they give the interviewer more flexibility and autonomy while interviewing the
34

participants (Gray, 2004). For instance, in semi-structured interviews, the interviewer could ask participants further and unplanned questions for clarification, or change the path of the interview if the participants provided unexpected ideas that the interviewer would like to know more about (Gray, 2004). Another advantage is that semi-structured interviews create friendly and comfortable environment for both the interviewer and the participants, unlike the structured interviews where the interviewer should only ask planned questions, and interaction with participants should be kept to minimum (Gray, 2004). Although semi-structured interviews have several advantages, there are limitations that the researcher should consider while adopting this method. One of the limitations of interviews in general is the bias they introduce to participants and consequently, to the data (Hughes, 1989, in Cohen et al, 2000). For instance, while interacting in the interview, the interviewer could ask the participants leading questions that could lead them to say what the interviewer would like to hear, and as Cohen et al (2000) suggested, using leading questions is like putting words in to participants mouth. The flexibility characterized in the semi-structured interviews could be another source of bias as the interviewer is not restricted to asking specific questions such as in structured interview. Thus, caution was taken in this study while conducting the interviews by avoiding leading questions and thereby reducing bias. Another limitation of semi-structured interviews is that they could be unreliable. Semi-structured interviews are non-standardized (Gray, 2004), and the lack of standardization ... inevitably raises concerns about reliability (Robson, 2002, p. 273). Reliability in interviews means asking the same questions, using the same order of the words and questions for each interviewee (Cohen, et al, 2000). It is easier to ensure reliability in structured interviews; however it is more difficult to ensure reliability in semi-structured interviews as it is hard to ensure asking the same questions in
35

the same sequence to different participants (Cohen, et al, 2000). Therefore, in order to achieve reliability, I prepared and used guiding questions for all my participants and myself to ensure that similar topics where covered in each interview (see Appendix C). This does not mean that questions were exactly the same in each interview; however guiding questions helped reduce bias as well as increase the level of reliability. 3.3.2 Open-ended questions Hatch (2002) suggests that Qualitative research seeks to capture participants perspectives, so formal interview questions need to be open-ended (p. 102). The aim of this study is to explore EFL teachers perceptions regarding the changes introduced to EFL teaching and learning which were obtained through the usage of open-ended questions. Kerllinger (1970) defined open-ended questions as those that supply a frame of reference for respondents answers, but put a minimum of restraint on the answers and their expressions (cited in Cohen et al, 2000, p. 275). One of the advantages of using open-ended questions is that they allow the researcher to gather rich and detailed data as they enable the participants to expand their answers and clarify any misunderstood views (Robson, 2002). Moreover, because open-ended questions provide no restrictions on participants answers, they are more likely to produce interesting and unanticipated answers (Robson, 2002) which allow the emergence of unexpected themes. On the other hand, the downside of using open-ended questions is that they could be difficult to analyze (Robson, 2002). Gathering variety of answers maybe difficult to categorize, compare or contrast. 3.3.3 Focus groups Semi-structured interviews could be conducted with individuals as well as groups. In this study I used focus group interviews. According to Morgan (1997) focus groups are basically group
36

interviews and the reliance is on interaction within the group, based on topics that are supplied by the researcher who typically takes the role of a moderator (p. 2). Vaughn, Schumm and Sinagub (1996) define focus group as an informal discussion among selected individuals about specific topics relevant to the situation at hand (p. 4). Both definitions highlight the importance of interaction among participants in focus group interviews. There are several reasons for selecting focus group interviews for this study. One of the main reasons is that focus group interviews generate data that could answer my research questions. Another reason is the advantages obtained from conducting focus group interviews. One of the advantages of using focus group interviews is the ability to observe interaction on a topic (Morgan, 1997, p. 10). The interviewer could directly indentify the similarities and differences regarding participants beliefs, opinions and experiences while observing their interaction (Morgan, 1997). Another advantage is that focus group provides accurate information about what participants actually think than do other research methods (Vaughn et al, 1996, p. 17). For instance, if questionnaires were used in this investigation, reluctant participants might answer the questions randomly and thereby negatively affect the data; however, in focus group interviews the participants were able explain their answers and provide examples from their experiences, which provided accurate information about their views. An additional advantage is that, through focus group interviews, hesitant or shy participants were encouraged and motivated to actively participate in the interview due to the natural and comfortable group setting. Krueger (1994) highlights that focus groups place people in a natural, real-life situations as opposed to the controlled experimental situations typical of quantitative studies (p. 34). He adds that the natural setting of focus groups encourage participants openness and honesty and reduce tension and pressure. Furthermore, Wilkinson (2004) proposes that focus
37

groups are naturalistic because they involve a range of communicative processes such as storytelling, arguing and joking. Focus group interviews, unlike individual interviews, can generate great amount of data from several participants at the same time with less cost (Cohen et al, 2000). They allow participants to comment or elaborate on responses made by other group members. This often leads to the production of more elaborated accounts than are generated in individual interviews (Wilkinson, 2004, p. 180). When participants agree on each others views they tend to elaborate or give examples which allow me as a moderator to collect more detailed data. Similarly, when participants disagree, they try to convince and persuade each other of their views which could also produce elaborated accounts (Wilkinson, 2004). In this study, through the focus group interviews the participants showed agreements and disagreements on several points. Focus group interviews could be homogeneous where participants share similar backgrounds, positions and experiences or heterogeneous where participants come for different backgrounds and positions and have different experiences (Robson, 2002). In this study, focus groups were homogeneous. Each interview involved EFL teachers from the same school, shared similar backgrounds and experiences, but teaching different levels. Conducting interviews with homogeneous groups facilitates and enhances group communication (Robson, 2002). EFL teachers knew each other before the interview which allowed them to express their perceptions more freely. There were also able to facilitate each other through elaborating on each others comments as well as reminding each other of the incidents they had. Moreover, through heterogeneous groups, participants were able express agreements or disagreements on each others views more safely and with acceptance from both parts (Robson, 2002).

38

My role in focus group interviews is to moderate and facilitate rather than to lead the interview. The moderator in focus group interviews does not ask questions directly to each participant, but, on the other hand, he or she facilitates the group interaction and encourages participants to actively interact with each other (Wilkinson, 2004). Krueger (1994) suggest that in focus groups The moderator exercises a mild, unobtrusive control over the group (101). This allows the participants to talk more freely about the topic which could lead the researcher to identify unexpected themes (Wilkinson, 2004). Although focus group interviews are effective data collection tools that could provide in-depth qualitative data, they also could be inefficient if misused. Bers (1989) believes that focus group research is both an art and a science (cited in Vaughn et al, 1996, p. 149). Therefore, not every researcher can conduct this type of interviews as it requires skilful and trained moderator who understands the dynamics of group interaction to conduct the interviews (Vaughn et al, 1996). In order to ensure that the focus group interviews were conducted effectively, in preparation to my role as a moderator, I carried out intensive reading about focus groups and observed several videos of real focus group interviews before conducting any. This helped me understand my role and how to use this data collection tool effectively. As mentioned above, the moderators roles are to keep the participants focused on the topic discussed as well as to ensure discussion flow. However, the moderator has less control on what the participants are saying and accordingly on the data produced (Gibbs, 1997). Because the moderator has less control on the discussion participants could be easily diverted. Kruger (1994) explains that through group discussions irrelevant topics may occur and the moderator should carefully guide the participants back to the main focus of the interview without affecting their enthusiasm for the topic. In order to keep the participants focused on the topic, a set of guiding
39

questions were prepared to the participants (see Appendix C). The guiding questions helped me prevent diversions as well as bias. One of the major limitations of focus group interviews is the generalizability of results. The results of focus groups cannot be generalized as they do not represent the wider population (Robson, 2002). On the other hand, Krueger (1996) claims that the intent of focus groups is not to infer but to understand, not to generalize but to determine the range, not to make statements about the population but to provide insights about how people perceive a situation (p.87). Focus group interviews were conducted to understand EFL teachers perceptions and experiences with change. Thus, generalization is not aimed for in this study. 3.3.4 Recording data Focus group interviews could be recorded in two ways, either using a tape-recorder or by writing notes (Krueger, 1994). In this study, both the tape-recorder and written notes were used to record the interviews. Using the tape-recorder allowed me to focus on recording the nonverbal side of the interview such as participants body language and facial expressions. However, brief comments of what the participants were saying were also taken for the need of caution if the recording failed or was not clear. 3.4 Research sample Depending on the purpose of this study which is to explore EFL teachers perceptions regarding the changes introduced to EFL teaching and learning in Abu Dhabi, the sampling strategies were determined. Convenience sampling was followed due to the difficulty of obtaining permissions as well as time constrain. Two Abu Dhabi girls schools that are part of ADECs project were selected for this study. Those schools were chosen because permissions to conduct the interviews
40

were obtained easily and teachers were willing to take part of this study. Furthermore, girls schools rather than boys schools were chosen due to the cultural barriers, as public schools in the UAE are separated by gender including faculty. Both the male teaches and I might not feel comfortable to conduct the interviews which could negatively affect the data. Therefore, only girls schools were chosen to be part of this study. The first school was a middle school and the second was a primary school. Both schools have been under ADECs project for three years but working with different companies. Teachers were asked to voluntarily participate in the interviews. Some teachers may not feel comfortable or confident to share their views and perceptions in front of others. Reasons for this may include fear of repercussions or shyness. Therefore, teaches were freely able to choose to participate in the interviews or not. This study aims to explore teachers true perceptions and experiences regarding changes introduced to EFL teaching and learning in their schools, so it was very important that teachers felt secure and confident to share their views and perceptions openly. In both schools, four EFL teachers out of eight volunteered to participate, however in the second school one of the teachers decided to withdraw before starting the interview because she had an urgent meeting with one of her students parents. 3.5 Ethical considerations Permission letters for conducting the interviews were signed by the principals and the EFL teachers. I designed two permission letters, one for the principals and the other for the teachers. The permission letter signed by the principals contained a description of the study and its aims, the number of teachers needed to be interviewed, the length of the interview, assurance of confidentiality and the anonymity as well as their permission to interview the EFL teachers (see Appendix A). Similarly, the permission letter signed by the teachers was similar to the principals
41

letter, however it contained permission for tape-recording and explained teachers rights (see Appendix B). By using the permission letters I was assured that the participants understood their rights and what they were getting involved in (Neuman, 2006). I also explained to the teachers that participating in the interview was voluntary to ensure that teachers were not forced to participant in the interviews and that they understood their right to agree or disagree to be involved in this study and the ability to withdraw anytime before or during the interview. Furthermore, during the course of this study the identity of the schools and the interviewed teachers were kept anonymous. For instance, while transcribing the interviews I referred to the teachers participated in this study as T1, T2, T3 and T4 (T1 = teacher 1, T2 = teacher 2 ...etc) and the name of the schools as S1 (school 1) and S2 (school 2). Furthermore, I explained and assured to the participants that their identity will be anonymous and the data produced from the interviews would not be used outside the context of this study. Neuman (2006) suggests that assuring confidentiality and anonymity encourages the participants to provide more open and honest responses even if they were asked about highly sensitive topics. 3.6 Procedure I phoned the schools principals to obtain preliminary approval to conduct the interviews with the EFL teachers in their schools. Then, I visited the schools to have a friendly chat with the EFL teachers, explain the aim of this study and obtain formal permissions from the principals as well as the EFL teachers to conduct the interviews. Once permissions were obtained, I arranged an appropriate time with the teachers to conduct the interviews during the school day. Furthermore, in order to ensure that all participants were free from any classes or duties during the interviews I informed the principals of the interview timing and length.
42

3.7 Data transcription Focus group interviews were transcribed directly after each interview. All responses were transcribed as Vaughn et al (1996) suggest that all responses should be transcribed whether they are relevant to the topic or not in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the focus group interviews and to avoid bias. After transcribing the data, I, as a bilingual speaker, translated the responses from Arabic to English. Another translation was made to the same data by a second bilingual speaker and compared with the first translation to ensure the accuracy of the data. One of the limitations of translating the data from one language to another is as discussed by Birbili (2000) that most languages bear some feelings, values, and assumptions that the researchers, particularly as an outsider, may not be aware of (cited in Liamputtong, 2010, p. 214). However, because I am considered as a native Arabic speaker, I was able to capture the assumptions and the meaning of the terms used by the participants accurately. According to Birbili (2000) It is recommended that in cases where two languages do not have direct verbal equivalence, the researcher attempt to gain comparability of meanings rather than concern about lexical comparability (cited in Liamputtong, 2010, p. 214). Therefore, while translating, I interpreted few responses as some terms may lose their meaning if literally translated and consequently may affect the reliability of the data (Birbili, 2000, cited in Liamputtong, 2010). 3.8 Data analysis The data produced from the focus group interviews were qualitatively analyzed. Krueger and Casey (2000) explain the process of analyzing focus group data which was adopted for this study. After transcribing the data, all responses were categorized by colour coding. Coding helped me compare response within each group and between different groups and to identify similarities and
43

differences in participants beliefs, opinions and experiences. Notes of the nonverbal communication from the two focus group interviews were also considered while analyzing the data. Emerging themes were listed and all related responses were listed under them. Finally, each theme was summarized and interpreted.

44

Chapter 4: Data Presentation and Analysis

4.1 Introduction This study aims to explore the teachers perceptions of the recent changes introduced to EFL teaching and learning in the public schools of Abu Dhabi, and to provide ADEC with suggestions that could help them promote changes more effectively in the future. This chapter presents a summary of the main findings which emerged from this study, followed by a discussion of these findings from the point of view of literature. The key questions of this study focus on the rationale for change and change models, the problems with change implementation in the specific context of EFL in the UAE, and the lessons that could be learned from the problems encountered in this particular context for future change efforts. In order to find answers to these questions, two focus group interviews were conducted with seven EFL teachers from two primary girls schools in Abu Dhabi. In each interview, teachers were provided with guiding questions to maintain the focus of the interview and to ensure that several aspects related to the topic were covered. The teachers answered the guiding questions through discussing them with each other. The interviews were tape-recorded accompanied with written notes. The findings indicate that teachers from both schools faced several problems with the recent changes to EFL teaching and learning. Most of the teachers showed lack of understanding regarding the changes and their aims, and most of them argued that their old practices and the curriculum they followed prior to the changes were more effective and appropriate for teaching and learning EFL in the UAE than those recently introduced. While observing the teachers in the

45

interviews, negative feelings such as frustration, anxiety and disappointment were noticed in their responses. Two primary themes emerged after transcribing teachers responses, which are discussed below: the problems with the most recent changes to TEFL as perceived by EFL teachers and teachers tacit models of effective change to TEFL. At the end of this chapter, I will provide recommendations for better changes to TEFL in the future. 4.2 The problems with the most recent changes to TEFL in the UAE as perceived by EFL teachers Teachers in both schools identified several problems associated with the recent changes to TEFL such as lack of rationale for change and its effects on the teachers implementing change, unclear roles, poorly planned and designed curriculum, lack of resources, lack of training, cultural boundaries, lack of monitoring and assessment and the impact on students outcomes and. It was interesting to observe that teachers in school 1 (S1) expressed their problems with more openness and depth than teachers in school 2 (S2). This could be due to the fact that the number of teachers participating in the interview from S1 was more than that of S2 as one teacher from S2 withdrew before starting the interview and another teacher left fifteen minutes before the end of the interview. This affected the amount of data as teachers in S2 were a bit conservative and shy in the interview. However, I was still able to tackle their problems with the recent changes introduced to their classrooms. 4.2.1 Lack of rationale for change and its effects on the teachers implementing change The lack of rationale for the recent changes was one of the major problems that teachers from both schools shared. The companies started working with both schools without clearly presenting their goals, mission and roles to the teachers. Furthermore, teachers were implementing the new changes
46

without understanding what they were doing and for what reason, which made them think that the new initiatives were useless and did not help improve TEFL or students outcomes. In S1, T3 stated that the company was treating them like robots and that they had to follow instructions without understanding the reason behind what we are doing. In addition, T1 in S2 commented that she did not know what are [the companys] goals and expected outcomes at the end of their plan and said, to be honest, I do not know why they are here. She added ironically that the government forced them on us. There are several factors that affect the success of change implementation and one of these factors is clarity. As suggested by Fullan (2007) Lack of claritydiffuse goals and unspecified means of implementationrepresents a major problem at the implementation stage (p. 89). Teachers in S1 and S2 showed lack of understanding of the companies mission and goals as they were either badly presented or poorly designed. This had a huge impact on the implementation of the new initiatives as teachers did not understand what they were doing which could indicate that teachers did not implement the new innovations successfully in their classrooms. Furthermore, Senge (1999) suggests that people will not spend any time or effort in something that they think is not relevant or important. Therefore, people need to be convinced of the importance of the new innovations in order to implement them. This is applicable to teachers as they would not be motivated or committed to a change initiative unless they were convinced of its importance. Lack of clarification of the companies goals and aims caused confusion and misunderstanding of what should be achieved, which affected teachers enthusiasm to work with the companies in order to implement the new innovations in their classrooms.

47

4.2.2 Unclear roles The lack of clarity was not only associated with the rationale of change, but it was also found in defining the roles of the schools, companies and EFL supervisors in the change process. Two teachers in S2 thought that the EFL supervisor assigned from the company was like an assistant who could help them prepare and type their lesson plans and exams. However, the other teacher thought that planning and preparing the lessons were the teachers job and that the supervisor should not help them do that. This made the two teachers question the supervisors role in their school, where they failed to find an answer. On the other hand, teachers in S1 stated that their supervisor did not provide them with any type of support. For example, T2 commented that the supervisor did not attend our classes and did not see our activities or our lesson plans. She did not do anything. Teachers were also unsure about the companies roles in their schools. Teachers in S1 and S2 indicated that although there was a partnership between the companies and the schools, no elements of partnership were found. Teachers in S1 stated that ADEC told them that the PPP project was a school improvement partnership, but teachers thought that the company just came to stay in their schools and not to improve. Similarly, T3 in S2 stated ADEC said that this is a partnership, but it does not seem so. She added: partnership means us working collaboratively with [the company] to improve TEFL, but the reality is something different. In addition, unclear roles made it difficult for teachers to know who was responsible for what. Teachers in S2 stated that whenever we raise an issue to [the company members] they would just say that the company or even sometimes ADEC asked us to do this and that. Another teacher added that whenever we

48

disagree on something they just ask us to talk to ADEC and one of the teachers replied in the interview saying yes, because they know that we will not. It was obvious that the company members were using ADEC or their company as a tool to threat teachers because they knew that the teachers would not have the courage to talk to ADEC or the company about their problems as some teachers may fear loosing their jobs. Furthermore, teachers in S1 pointed out that they were lost between the companys and the schools demands and that they did not know who they were accountable to. One of the teachers explained that the school asked us to do things and the company asked us to do the opposite. We did not know what to do or who to listen to, while another teacher added: we were lost in between. ADEC suggests that the purpose of its PPP project is to work with teachers and principals to improve the quality of the instruction and to increase student achievement in government schools (Abu Dhabi Education Council, 2010). However, teachers in both schools felt that there were no equal partnerships between the companies and schools as companies had greater authority than the schools. In this regards, Bolman and Deal (2003) assert that unclear roles may cause ambiguity and confusion. Through its project, it was found that ADEC did not clarify the companies role in the schools prior to or throughout the course of the PPP project. This caused severe miscommunication problems between the parties involved in the change project (i.e. the schools, teachers and the companies), which negatively affected the schools and teachers relationship with the companies. Bolman and Deal (2003), in their structural frame, suggest that change efforts must expect and predict structural issues as well as reassigning roles and relationships. This means that ADEC should clearly define the companies role in the schools as well as the schools role in the change process in order to avoid misunderstanding of responsibilities.

49

4.2.3 Poorly planned and designed curriculum Teachers in both schools indicated that the new curriculums provided by the companies were poorly planned and designed. Teachers in S1 reported that the company asked them to stop using their old books without providing them with alternative books to use and that their old curriculum was replaced with an inappropriate one. T2 stated that [the company] gave us some papers and told us that this would be our new curriculum and T3 added that the new curriculum was a file with some papers that contained some activities that we should use with our students. However, teachers in S1 argued that these activities were not appropriate to the UAE culture. For instance, T1 stated that most of the reading materials and websites provided to the teachers were related to the American culture. Teachers also indicated that the new curriculum was less interesting and entertaining compared to the old one as it covered two themes only in a semester, which made the teachers and the students feel bored. Furthermore, the curriculum and the examination system were not related as T2 claimed that what we teach [the students] in the classroom is something and what is in the real exam paper is something else; she added that it seemed that all what we have been doing in the classroom with the children was useless. On the other hand, teachers in S2 suffered from the constant changes in the curriculum. For example, in the first year, the company asked the teachers to stop using their old books and to teach the students through stories only. In the following year company provided the students with one course book and two stories for each semester. In the third year, however, they asked the teachers to use their old curriculum and books as they used to do prior to implementing the changes. One of the teachers stated that they were in a complete mess, while another teacher said that parents were complaining and asking us what is this, why are you changing the curriculum every year? When I asked the teachers whether or not the company assessed the old curriculum
50

and books before introducing any change they replied: they would not ask us to eliminate the books and use them again if they have looked at them. Another teacher said: we tried to discuss this issue with our supervisor, but she did not have anything to say. Lack of assessment on the previous curriculum and practise made the new innovations useless and worthless. After three years of constant changes to the curriculum in S2, the company realized that the old curriculum was appropriate and that it could help them achieve their desired goals. This could indicate that the company did not assess the old curriculum or even looked at it before they plan for change. Meanwhile, the company in S1 asked the teachers to stop using the old curriculum and books without providing them with appropriate alternatives. Fullan (2007) claims that the major initial stance should involve critical assessment, that is, determining whether the change is desirable in relation to certain goals and whether it is implementable (p. 119). The reformers should critically assess their initiatives before moving to the implementation stage. They should check whether their new innovations are important, bring development, lead to the desired goals, and are implementable, and whether the resources that could support the new innovations are available (Fullan, 2007). In addition, Senge (1999) suggests that creating clear and convincing reasons for change initiatives could help increase peoples commitment to change. If the teachers were convinced that the new curriculum was better than the old curriculum and that changes in the curriculum could improve TEFL and students outcomes, they would be highly motivated to implement these changes. The companies wasted time, money and effort while brining constant non-deliberate changes to the curriculum.

51

4.2.4 Lack of resources In addition to the poorly planned and designed curriculum, the schools, teachers and students suffered from the lack of resources throughout the change period. Lack of essential resources such as textbooks for the teachers and students, printing and copying machines, and computers made it so difficult for teachers in S1 to implement the changes in their classrooms. Teachers in S1 claimed that they had bad experiences with planning their lessons as they did not have a textbook to use and were not able to easily print or copy the activities they prepared. One of the teachers said that we were in a complete mess. The lack of resources made it so hard for us to do anything, and claimed that even the school did not support and help them to overcome this problem. T2 reported that the school told us that since the company did not supply us with books, they should provide us with printers and sheets to copy and print our classroom worksheets. The school made it so hard for us to copy and print worksheets and told us that it was affecting the schools budget. Parents had also suffered from the lack of textbooks and worksheets. They complained that the teachers were not teaching their children anything and that they did not give them enough worksheets for homework. Parents were also complaining about the textbooks as one of the teachers stated that until now my students do not have books and the parents are complaining regarding this matter. They said that they do not know how to help their children at home when they have no idea about what their children are learning. The teachers in S1 reported that the company promised them on several occasions to provide them with highly-equipped classrooms and laptops for each teacher. However, the teachers said that none of these promises came true and that after three years of delays, the company started

52

providing them with some essential materials such as a printer and one laptop for the whole department. Before that, teachers struggled to teach the new curriculum and applied the new practices without the required materials. The teachers seemed frustrated regarding this matter as one of them complained that they always tell us that at the end of the semester we will be provided with everything we need, but we did not see anything. Another teacher added: we had enough promises and they would never be real. The third teacher said: we never believe what they say unless we see things with our own eyes. On the other hand, teachers in S2 did not have any problems with the resources. Their school provided them with the essential resources such as laminating machine, photo-copiers and computers. Teachers stated that the school was very supportive from the beginning and that before the company started working in our school, we had all of these resources. Moreover, the company provided the teachers with illustrating materials such as data shows. In my opinion, the lack of resources could be one of the major resistance forces. Fullan (2006) suggests that one of the reasons for the lack of implementation is the inadequate resources to support implementation (p. 124). Students in S1 did not have a textbook which means that they were mainly depending on the resources provided by their teachers such as worksheets. However, due to the lack of resources and support from the company and the school, it was difficult for the teachers to prepare their lessons or implement any changes. Lewin (1947) asserts that support is essential in the movement stage; in this stage, teachers start adopting new practices and behaviors. One way of supporting teachers is to provide them with the essential resources such as printers and computers. The company in S1 needs to understand that broken promises never brings comfort to teachers, but on the contrary, they only result in loss of the companys credibility and trust in the school.
53

4.2.5 Lack of training The lack of training and development was one of the major problems that teachers from both schools discussed in the focus group interviews. Teacher reported that the companies introduced several innovations and asked them to implement these innovations without giving them any training on how to implement such innovations effectively in their classrooms. Teachers in S1 claimed that the company did not give them useful workshops and that most of the workshops were useless. Teachers were forced to stay beyond school hours to attend workshops which they thought were useless and repetitive and the suggested that they already studied what the company was presenting in their universities. For instance, in the third year, when the company started to provide the teachers with some illustrating materials such as data shows and the PowerPoint, teachers stated that the company only explained to them how these tools worked. T1 said that the company taught them how to use [the illustrating materials] but not how to integrate them in our classrooms. T3 added: they gave us a presentation on how to use these materials. However, the teachers needed different type of training and workshops as they argued that they need more practical workshops; and they added: that is what we are missing and what we do need. We need them to train us how to teach using new and modern teaching methods by giving us live examples for the classroom. In addition, the company in S1 introduced a new grading system based on written reports rather than grade certificates with numbers. The teachers were asked to follow the new grading system even if they did not like it, and without teaching them how to write such reports, which created several problems with the students and parents. When I asked the teachers whether the company trained them on how to use the new grading system they replied: no, they forced us to use these reports even though we did not like them and they gave us a week to write reports for the entire
54

school. Besides, teachers mentioned that the parents did not understand this kind of reports and did not like it and that they had several problems with angry parents who did not understand the content of the report. On the contrary, teachers in S2 indicated that their company gave them some workshops at the first year of working with the school. However, the number of workshops decreased significantly in the second year. T3 stated I think that at the beginning [the company] was more active and it cared more than it does now, and T1 added: I think that the training was not enough. We need more training. When I asked the teacher about the resources, they told me that the company asked them to use more illustrating materials in the classrooms such as data shows and PowerPoint. However, the teachers had some difficulties in using these materials in their classrooms as one of the teachers stated that our students tend to destroy these illustrating materials and suggested that it was difficult to use them in the classroom. Another teacher explained that [the company] was giving the students more advanced materials and without any training or proper introduction and added it is difficult to suddenly introduce something new to the students. In summary, teachers in both schools reported that they did not have appropriate and enough training before moving to the implementation stage. Teachers implemented the changes lacking the important skills and knowledge required for each innovation, which caused a lot of problems and stress to the teachers as well as parents. Bolman and Deal (2003) argue that some change initiatives stumble because they ignore developing individuals who are involved in change and that people tend to resist change because it is sometimes difficult. When teachers lack the skills and knowledge needed to implement changes, they tend to feel lost and anxious, and for this reason many teachers prefer their old practices. Forcing teachers to implement new innovations are not a feasible solution for this problem. However, Bolman and Deal (2003) suggest that developing
55

peoples understanding, knowledge and skills are essential to increase their confidence and ability to implement change effectively. Teachers in S2 thought that the new illustrating materials were difficult to use in their classrooms because their students were not familiar with this type of materials. In my view, the problem is not related to students, but it is rather related to teachers lacking the skills to use these illustrating materials; the teachers did not know how to introduce these materials effectively to their classrooms. However, teachers found it difficult to admit that they needed to learn how to use these materials which made them say that the problem was with the students and not themselves. Teachers in S2 and S1 thought that they were better than the company members who were working in their schools in regards to teaching skills and knowledge. This could be the reason why teachers in S2 did not ask their supervisor for help, even when they needed it. Senge (1999) claims that people find it very difficult to ask for help (p. 107) and he suggests that leaders need to articulate individuals attitudes and feelings that prevent them from asking for help and develop selfawareness in both the individual and the group level. In other words, teachers need to learn how to seek help when it is needed and not to allow their pride to negatively affect them. 4.2.6 Cultural boundaries The companies members working in the schools were not from the UAE or the Arab region. Some of them previously worked in UAE private schools and others came directly from their home countries. Teachers in S1 and S2 talked about their problems with the companies members asserting that the cultural boundaries had a significant effect on teachers relationship with the companies. Teachers in S1 stated that [the companys] problem is that [it is] still having lack of information and knowledge about the nature of our country and society, and they thought that it

56

was very important for the company members to know and understand the UAE culture and religion before working in the school. T4 stated, with frustration, why did ADEC bring companies which know nothing about our educational history and our culture and religion? Providing the teachers with inappropriate resources strongly suggests that the company members did not understand the UAE culture and the Islamic religion as one of the teachers explained that is why they are spending lots of money on books and resources that are not appropriate to our culture. Similarly, teachers in S2 agreed that their company did not understand much about the UAE culture. T2 told the other teachers about a conversation she had with their supervisor saying that the supervisor told her that she read in the website that [UAE people] live in tents and use camels and that she always thought about us in this way. The teachers laughed while T2 continued: she was amazed when she saw who we are. Teachers in both schools also mentioned that their companies had a lack understanding and knowledge about the school culture and EFL teaching in their schools. Teachers in S1 reported that none of the company members observed their classrooms and lessons before planning the change and that they thought that the company did not know anything about them or their capacity. Teachers in S2 said that the company members were amazed when they saw their abilities and the resources they had, and that the company did not know how to help us, they think that we are very good. Both companies worked in the UAE schools without understanding the countrys culture and religion. This created an enormous gap between the teachers and the company members. For example, teachers in S1 felt that their culture and religion were not respected when the company

57

provided the teachers with inappropriate materials that were related to other countries cultures. Senge (1999) argues that people cannot create a new culture. However, they need to study others cultures in order to introduce new values and new ways of doing things. Without understanding where the teachers and students come from, their values and assumptions, cultural conflict may occur between what the company thinks and what the teachers believes is the appropriate way to improve TEFL. Unfortunately, the companies in S1 and S2 underestimated the significance of conducting a prior evaluation of the school culture especially with regards to TEFL. EFL teachers experiences, strengths and weaknesses were not effectively employed in the process of planning for change. This made the teachers believe that their experiences were neglected and that the companies did not know anything about EFL teaching and learning in their schools. I certainly believe that the companies should know the teachers who they work with by learning their culture and religion if needed. This will help them create a better vision on how to plan for successful change and how to improve their relationship with the teachers. In addition, prior observations and evaluations to EFL classrooms are important to understand the challenges they are dealing with. 4.2.7 Lack of monitoring and assessment After implementing change, the two companies did not monitor or evaluate the teachers implementation of the changes introduced to TEFL. Teachers in S1 reported that their supervisor did not check their lesson plans or observe their classrooms to evaluate the appropriateness of their lessons and to make sure whether they were implementing the changes as required. Similarly, teachers in S2 indicated that their supervisor never attended their classrooms unless there was an inspection by ADEC or the companys inspectors.

58

More importantly, ADECs inspectors did not conduct regular inspection to evaluate the companies efforts and achievements in developing the schools. Teachers in S1 stated that no one is monitoring [the company]. No one has assessed what is going on in the classrooms after the company took over to evaluate the effectiveness of the company and their plans. Teachers also claimed that the inspectors did not try to talk to the teachers to get acquainted with their problems and needs. T3 in S2 stated we never got the chance to talk to [the inspectors] and they never ask us anything, while T2 argued that they just visit some classrooms for a short time and take pictures. Similarly, T3 in S1 said that the inspectors never talked to the teachers and that they usually visit their classrooms for 10 minutes and leave. Assessments are great tools to evaluate the effectiveness of the change initiatives. Senge (1999) suggests that assessments help in gathering information regarding the implementation results. Using the collected information, the inspectors could evaluate the effectiveness of the new innovations and accordingly provide the change reformers with feedback. Such feedback is required to judge the effectiveness of the change program, compare the new results with the results of the past and identify problems. Through the feedback, the change reformers could discuss the results to find solutions to problems and to improve their future plans. The companies need to assess teachers performance and implementation of the new innovations through conducting explicit classroom observations and assessing students progress. Classroom observations are essential because they reflect the teachers understanding of the new innovations, allow immediate assessment of the effectiveness of these innovations in improving the teachers and students outcomes and provide the teachers with feedback regarding their performance. Teachers need feedback on their performance on regular basis to know where they stand how to move forward.
59

Fullan (2007) emphasizes the importance of the external and internal accountability and suggests that they are useful, even vital, means for understanding and improving performance (p. 60). Assessments should not be a sign for lack of trust or too tight control; they are important tools for learning as they help people clarify goals and where they are in relations to achieving them, and it gives them a tool for improvement because it links performance data with changes in instruction needed to increase achievement (Fullan, 2007, p. 60). I believe that lack of accountability might be one of the reasons why change initiatives in TEFL seemed to be ineffective and useless as teachers in S1 and S2 described them. Appropriate assessments and evaluations are important in any stage of the change development. They lead to celebrating the success or developing future plans. 4.2.8 Impact on students outcomes Teachers in S1 indicated that since changes were introduced to TEFL, nothing noticeable happened regarding the improvement of students outcomes. Teachers argued that students marks were even better before the change initiation and that if any improvement was noticed, it does not mean that the company should take the credit for doing a great job. Teachers claimed that they worked very hard to improve students results and helped their students when they were struggling with the changes. On the other hand, teachers in S2 stated that the company did not do anything to say that they had an impact on our students grades neither in a good way nor in a bad way. Teachers in S2 believed that the company did not bring improvement to TEFL in their schools and that after introducing the changes, teachers were asked to return to their old practices using their old curriculum.

60

Teachers in S1 thought it was important to point out that the company was manipulating students results to show ADEC that students performance had improved since the company worked with the school, which I thought was very surprising point. Teachers reported that at the end of every year the company manipulates students grades and that it did change the results so that students grades would be higher. Teachers explained that this means that students grades have decreased since the company worked in our school, but they dont want to show that. Unfortunately, students noticed that their marks at the end of each year did not represent their real performance and abilities. This problem had a negative impact on students attitudes as T3 stated that the girls are now telling us that they do not need to study hard because at the end they know that they are going to pass and that the company would help them; T2 added: some students told us that they did not answer half of the questions in the exam but still could pass with high results. When I asked the teachers whether they tried to talk to anyone regarding this problem, they said that we have no one to talk to and that the principal and the entire school know about this and they are suffering from this problem as well. Teachers felt that the school had no authority over what was going on and that the principal could not do anything about this issue. In S2, teachers indicated that no change took place in TEFL in their school that could affect students outcomes. This could indicate that the company was not doing their job in initiating positive change to TEFL, which was a surprising finding and unexpected to hear in this interview. The company in S1, however, seemed to acknowledge its failure to bring effective change to TEFL through manipulating students results instead of identifying problems that decreased students outcomes. This company lost their credibility and trust in the school; through their irresponsible action, teachers lost faith on their abilities as change reformers. Teachers stated: now, we implement what is convenience to us and what we think is right and added: now they tell us what
61

they want us to do and we do it in our own way, using our own methods. This means that teaching EFL is still the same as minor changes were noticed in both schools. 4.3 Teachers tacit models of effective change to TEFL During the interview, teachers in S1 and S2 showed their understanding of the key elements of the effective change. Teachers in S1 believed that the company changed everything at the same time without breaking these changes into steps and added that the company could do these changes in stages, semester by semester. This indicates that teachers understood that change is a process rather than an event, which Lewin (1947) and Senge (1999) point out in their models of change. Teachers in S1 and S2 talked about the importance of training and preparation. Teachers in S1 thought that prior to introduction of any changes; teachers need to be trained on how to implement these changes successfully in their classrooms. Similarly, Teachers in S2 talked about the importance of training and workshops in developing teachers capacity and improving their classroom practices. Fullan (2007) argues that successful change initiations in education tend to fail because they forget to develop and prepare teachers who could implement changes effectively. Similarly, Bolman and Deal (2003) in their human resource frame assert that changes in routine practice and procedure undermine existing knowledge and skills, and they undercut peoples ability to perform with confidence and success (p. 373). They suggest that training, psychological support, and participation are important factors to increase peoples confidence in implementing change (p. 373). Teachers in S1 also talked about the importance of providing the teachers with practical training by giving them live examples from the classroom. Senge (1999) agrees that training programs need to take place inside the organization where people could

62

directly link their experiences with what they learn. In my opinion, teachers training programs should start from their own schools inside their classrooms. Teachers in S1 and S2 agreed that clarity is crucial for the success of any change process. Teachers in S2 argued that things would be easier [if the company] gives us a clear idea about their goals. Similarly, teachers in S1 talked about the importance of providing them with clear plans and objectives as T3 claimed that nothing would work without a clear plan no matter how hard [the company] worked, T1 added: Im sure that if they explained to us their plan properly things would be better. Senge (1999) asserts that effective change relies on the clarity and credibility of the change reformers aims and values and that if people feel that their leaders can be trusted to support new values and actions, they will be more willing to commit time and effort and to take risks (p. 197). Therefore, he companies in S1 and S2 need to understand that having clear plans, goals and aims could help them increase their credibility and trust, and if this is achieved, teachers will be motivated and committed to change. Throughout the interviews, teacher in both schools talked explicitly about the importance of teacher involvement in the change initiatives. Teachers in S1 suggested that the company needed to involve them in the planning stage by asking them about their ideas and opinions. Similarly, teachers in S2 commented they should listen to us, we are the ones who teach in the classrooms and we have better insight about what is going on in the classrooms and that we only receive instructions and have not been involved in anything. Fullan (2007) highlights the importance of involving teachers in change activities and listening to their needs. He asserts that
Innovators need to be open to the realities of others: sometimes because the ideas of others will lead to alterations for the better in the direction of change, and sometimes because the

63

others realties will expose the problems of implementation that must be addressed and at the very least will indicate where one should start (p. 109)

Thus, it is important to encourage teachers participation and involvement in the change process because they are the actual implementers of change in their classrooms. Bolman and Deal (2003) claim that allowing employees to participate and engage in decision making related to their work and working conditions improves their performance, motivation and productivity. Teachers would be more motivated and committed to change if they were given the opportunity to participate in the planning, implementation and evaluation processes. 4.5 Conclusion In summary, teachers have encountered many problems with ADECs change initiatives to improve TEFL. Lack of resources and training, lack of teacher involvement, and lack of regular monitoring and assessment were some of restraining forces that have prevented any effective change to take place in EFL classrooms in the UAE. Before the interviews, I anticipated some problems such as the lack of resources and training. In addition, unexpected issues related to the recent change initiatives emerged during the interviews. One of the unexpected findings was that the company in S2 did not introduce any changes to EFL classrooms after failing to change the curriculum. For this reason, teachers in S2 seemed to have fewer problems with the company than S1 as no changes were introduced in their teaching routine. Another shocking finding was that the company in S1 manipulated students outcomes to hide their failure and to show ADEC that they were doing a good job in the school. ADEC stated that their project is being used to diagnose, test, and assess the benefits of utilizing private sector expertise to improve public education and to achieve defined goals (Abu Dhabi Education Council, 2010). However, findings indicate that that

64

there was a lack of monitoring and assessments in both schools which could be the main reason for the change failure. The findings discussed above indicate that the companies lacked the awareness and understanding of the change processes which was ultimately reflected on the problems that the teachers had with change initiatives. I strongly believe that, the change initiatives planned by the companies could improve TEFL, but the lack of awareness about the change process and its models made these initiatives ineffective in practice. Fullan (2007) argues that Promoters of change need to be committed and skilled in the change process as well as in the change itself (p. 108). Thus, successful change does not only require creating effective programs and innovations, but also requires a thorough understanding of the change process.

65

Chapter Five: Conclusion

5.1 Introduction This chapter evaluates the work undertaken in this study in terms of the effectiveness of the methodological approach and the data collection tools. Then, it summarizes the main findings of this study followed by recommendations to ADEC on how to improve educational reform in the future. Future Research are highlighted at the end of this chapter. 5.2 Critical evaluation of the work undertaken The methodological approach used in this study proved its effectiveness and success in generating the data that served the aim of this study. This study set out to explore teachers perceptions to the recent changes to EFL teaching and learning. Therefore, qualitative research methods such as semi-structured interviews were the most appropriate data collection tools for this small-scale study as they were more flexible than the other types of interviews. In addition, focus group interviews significantly succeeded to encourage teachers to openly and honestly talk about their experiences and perceptions. Due to the time constraint two schools were only investigated in this study which could affect the generality of the results. Another factor that could affect the generalization of the results is the fact that only girls schools participated in this study. It would have been more interesting to interview male teachers from boys schools and compare their experiences and perceptions with female teachers from the girls schools.

66

5.3 Summary of the main findings It has been three years since ADECs PPP project implementation in S1 and S2. The project aims to work with teachers and principals to improve the quality of instruction and increase student achievement in government schools (Abu Dhabi Education Council, 2010). However, the findings of this study indicate that the teachers faced several problems with the PPP project and that the project failed to improve the quality of instruction or increase student achievement in both S1 and S2, which are managed by two different companies. Two major themes emerged from analyzing the interviews. The first theme discusses the problems that teachers encountered with the recent changes to EFL teaching and learning. The second theme articulates teachers understanding and knowledge of the change models that were associated with their responses. It was found that teachers in S1 and S2 faced some similar problems related to the recent changes to TEFL. One of these problems was that the companies did not clearly present their mission and aims to the teachers, which had an enormous impact on the implementation of the new innovations. Teachers were asked to accomplish tasks without explaining to them the aims of these tasks, what exactly they needed to accomplish and the methods they need to follow in order to achieve the aims of the tasks. In addition, the roles of the supervisor, the company and the school itself in the change process were not clearly defined in both schools. Both companies tried to introduce changes to the EFLs curriculum. However, the findings indicate that both companies did not plan for such changes appropriately. The company in S1 did not assess the appropriateness of their new curriculum to the UAE culture and the Islamic religion. On the other hand, the lack of assessment of the old curriculum before planning for a new one cost
67

the company in S2 time and effort where they realized after two years of constant changes that there was nothing wrong with the old curriculum and that it served their aims. Lack of resources was one of the major problems that teachers in S1 had. The company did not provide the teachers in S1 with the essential resources they needed to implement the changes successfully. On the contrary, teachers in S2 did not have any problems with the resources as their school and company provided them with all the resources they needed. This indicates that the four companies working in the PPP project does not have similar identical school development plans. The findings suggest that one of the reasons that affected the effectiveness of the new innovations was the lack of training and preparation for the teachers, who are the implementers of these innovations. Teachers in both schools suffered from the lack of appropriate and effective workshops that could help them implement changes successfully and improve their capacity. Most of the workshops arranged by the companies were repetitive and did not address the teachers needs. Another important finding was the lack of internal and external assessments and monitoring throughout the change process. The companies did not monitor the teachers in the implementation process and did not assess teachers implementation of the new innovations. Similarly, ADEC did not appropriately assess the companies efforts in improving and developing the EFL classrooms. Therefore, lack of accountability was one of the factors that affected the success of the change initiatives in the EFL classrooms. As stated earlier, one of the projects aims was to increase students outcomes. However, it was found that students performance did not improve since the two companies have started working in the schools. Due to the lack of accountability, the company in S1 manipulated students results by
68

increasing the actual results at the end of the years exams, while the company in S2 did not introduce any changes to the EFL classrooms, which indicate that it did not improve the students outcomes in any ways. Finally, it was found that teachers from both schools understood some elements of change process which were evident in their responses. For instance, teachers in S1 understood that change is a process and not an event, and that the company needed to implement their changes in stages. Furthermore, teachers from both schools talked explicitly about the importance of training and preparation for successful implementation. They believed that teachers need to be trained on how to implement the new innovations in their classrooms. They also believed that training should be practical and should start from the classrooms. In addition, teachers deemed that any successful change should have clear plan, vision and aims. Finally, teachers argued that they needed to be involved as active participants throughout the change process. 5.4 Recommendations Based on the findings from the current study, recommendations have been drawn to ADEC on how to successfully reform TEFL in the future. Before planning for any change, ADEC needs to identify the real problems that hinder EFL teaching and learning, and based on these problems they should plan for change by creating new innovations that could help improve and develop TEFL. In addition, I think that it is not wrong to learn from the educational experiences of other countries, but it is wrong to assume that what have worked in other countries could work in the UAE. I agree with Ridge (2009) that sustainable solutions to the education challenges of the region require policy decisions based on local realities rather than on international opinions. Bringing companies from outside that lack the understanding of the EFL teaching and learning situation in the UAE,

69

the UAE culture and religion and students and teachers needs would not help in developing the situation and results may sometimes be disappointing. Therefore, I believe that ADEC should encourage teachers to design and create local solutions that could help improve TEFL and increase students outcomes. This will create a dynamic learning environment where teachers learn from their actions and from each other. Senge (1999) suggests that initiatives driven by learning are more sustainable than those driven by authority. I believe that the change process is a cycle where one plans for change, implements it, evaluates its effectiveness and identifies its problems. Once problems are identified, one should go through that cycle again and again until the desired goals are achieved. Thus, the process of change does not stop at the implementation stage, but it should continue to include the monitoring and evaluation stage, where one can learn from the mistakes and find ways to move forward. ADEC needs to monitor and evaluate the implementation stage carefully in order to assess the effectiveness of the new innovations in the EFL classrooms and to assess the teachers performance during the implementation stage. The lack of monitoring could affect the sustainability of change as teachers could easily go back to their old practices if they were not appropriately monitored. Moreover, ADEC should assess and monitor the companies throughout the life time of the project in order to create a sense of accountability in the companies. 5.5 Routes for future research This is a small-scale study aimed to explore teachers perceptions of the recent changes to EFL teaching and learning in Abu Dhabis public schools. Yet, this study could be extended so that it involves a larger number of schools covering both girls and boys schools, in order to provide a better evaluation of the recent changes to TEFL. In addition, this study is only considered to

70

evaluate the change processes adopted by the companies. In the future, this study could be extended to evaluate the new innovations in terms of their appropriateness and effectiveness in the EFL classrooms through conducting classrooms observations and exploring students and parents perceptions.

71

Bibliography
Abu Dhabi Education Council (2008) KG, Primary: Public-Private Partnership Schools, Internet WWW page at URL: http://www.adec.ac.ae/en/our-projects-en/kg-primary-education.html (accessed 20/7/2010) Bolman, L. & Deal, T. (2003) Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Burnes, B. (2004) Kurt Lewin and the Planned Approach to Change: A Re-appraisal, Journal of Management Studies, 41, no. 6, 977-1001 Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986) Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research, London: Routledge Ltd Change-Management-Coach.com (2010) Kurt Lewin Change Management Model, Internet WWW page at URL: http://www.change-management-coach.com/kurt_lewin.html (accessed 11/06/2010) Cummings, T., G. and Worley C., G. (2009) Organization Development and Change, Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning Fullan, M. (2007) The New Meaning of Educational Change, London: Routledge Fullan, M. (1993) Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform, London: The Falmer Press Fullan, M. (1982) The Meaning of Educational Change, New York: Teachers College Press Gibbs, A. (1997) Focus groups, 19, Internet WWW page at URL: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html (accessed 21/06/2010) Gray, D., E., (2009) Doing Research in the Real World (2nd Edition), London: Sage Publications Hargreaves, A. (2005) Extending Educational Change: International Handbook for Educational Change, New York: Springer Hatch, A. (2002) Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings, New York: State University of New York Press Kelliher, F. (2005) Interpretivism and the Pursuit of Research Legitimisation: An Integrated Approach to Single Case Design, Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3, no. 2, 123-132
72

Kezar, A., J. (2001) Understanding and Facilitating Organizational Change in the 21st Century, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28, no. 4, 1-153 Kritsonis, A. (2005) Comparison of Change Theories, International Journal of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity, 8, no. 1, 1-7 Krueger, R., A. (1994) Focus Groups: A practical Guide for Applied Research, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Krueger, R., A. & Casey, M., A. (2000) Focus Groups: a practical guide for applied research (3rd Edition), California: Sage Publications Liamputtong, P. (2010) Performing Qualitative Cross-Cultural Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Miller, J. & Glassner, B. (2004) The inside and the outside: Finding realities in interviews, in Silverman, D. (2004) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, London: SAGE Publications Morgan, D., L., (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (2nd Edition), California: Sage Publications Morgan, G. (1998) Images of Organization, California: SAGE Publications Mullins, L., J. (2007) Management and Organisational Behaviour, Essex: Pearson Education Limited Neuman, W., L. (2006) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (Sixth Edition), Boston: Pearson Education Oxford Dictionaries (2010), Internet WWW page at URL: http://oxforddictionaries.com/search? searchType=dictionary&isWritersAndEditors=true&searchUri=All&q=to+change&contentVersio n=WORLD (accessed, 16/07/2010) Ridge, N. (2009) In education we must learn from our mistakes, Internet WWW page at URL: http://www.thenational.ae/article/20090219/OPINION/176478472&SearchID=73345732578242 (accessed 12/08/2010) Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research (Second Edition), Malden: Blackwell Publishing Rudner, R., S. (1954) Philosophy of Science Association, Philosophy of Science, 21, no. 2, 164168

73

Schein, E., H. (1996) Kurt Lewins Change Theory in the Field and in the Classroom: Notes Toward a Model of Managed Learning, Reflections, 1, no. 1, 59-73 Senge, P. (1999) The Dance of Change, London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing Sikes, P., J. (1992) Imposed Change on the Experienced Teacher in Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. (1992) Teacher Development and Educational Change, Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer Smith, M., K. (2001) Kurt Lewin, groups, experiential learning and action research, Internet WWW page at URL: http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-lewin.htm (accessed 18/07/2010) Trigg, R. (2001) Understanding Social Science, Malden: Blackwell Publishing Vaughn S., Schumm, J., S., & Sinagub, J. (1996) Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology, California: Sage Publications Wilkinson, S. (2004) Focus group research, in Silverman, D. (2004) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, London: SAGE Publications

74