Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
Investment project is a decision or a venture which requires engagement of certain resources. When setting out an investment project a company or an individual faces various risks. Every investment is characterized by two components: cash flows and time period within they are conducted. It is necessary to establish project reports for that matter which must be as accurate as possible. Cash flow of the project is the composition of cash inflows or outflows. It gives a dynamic picture of the ultimate changes in cash resulting from the combined decisions made during a given period. Time value of money is the key concept of investment or savings. When establishing accounts for a long term investment, a discount rate is the measure of time value of money and it has extreme influence on the valuation results. The net difference of the present costs and benefits is the net present worth. Internal rate of return is a discount rate which reduces the net present value of the investment to 0. Payback period is a count of time necessary for a project to pay off for itself. Profitability index includes dividing total cash inflow and outflow. Annuity method describes the yearly costs of the project based on adapting the discounted cash flows to an annual level.
Table of contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 2. Investment information necessary for the valuation .............................................................. 4 2.1. Cash flow of the investment project ............................................................................... 4 2.2. Setting up a discount rate ......................................................................................... ......5 3. Net present value .................................................................................................................... 7 4. Internal rate of return.............................................................................................................. 8 5. Payback period ....................................................................................................................... 9 6. Discounted payback period ................................................................................................. 10 7. Profitability index ................................................................................................................. 11 8. Annuity method .................................................................................................................... 12 9. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 14 10. References .......................................................................................................................... 15
Index of tables
Table 1. Project cash flow statement, pg. 5 Table 2. WACC calculation, pg. 6 Table 3. Discount rates through periods, pg. 6 Table 4: Net present value, pg. 7 Table 5: Internal rate of return, pg. 8 Table 6: Payback period, pg. 9 Table 7: PBP assumption (years), pg. 9 Table 8: Discounted payback period, pg. 10 Table 9: DPBP assumption (years), pg. 10 Table 10: Profitability index, pg. 11 Table 11: PI calculation, pg. 11 Table 12: Equivalent annuity, pg. 12 Table 13: Annuity comparison, pg. 13
1. Introduction
An investment project can be defined as a decision or venture which requires engagement of certain resources. When setting out on an investment project a company or an individual faces various risks. Some of them are associated to external factors like business cycles, interest rates, political, legal, ecological factors etc., while others are related to internal factors including economic strength of the entrepreneur, experience, human potential quality and know-how for example. Although many non-numerical factors can be used to support the investor's claims about the efficiency and bright perspective of a certain investment, a complete project valuation has to include standard tools of financial analysis. The key for giving project a positive rating is that the benefits of it outmatch its costs. Methods that use discounting of cash flows in order to support management decisions are important at least as a mean of eliminating the non profitable project if the ratios show negative. Secondly, investment project quantitative valuation can be used in comparing two or more investments and deciding which is the optimal for the investor. Within a certain investment calculations can be made on questions of capital structure, operational costs, expected revenues etc. Final decision is always made by managers, but the quality of the decision support material may often be a key parameter of the decision. This text is a review of methods and techniques for analyzing an investment from the stand of the investor. All of them are based on cash flows and the most of them insist on discounting future cash flows on todays level. Taking into consideration the long-term nature of investment projects (from 3 or 5 to over 20 years), it seams more than reasonable to include discounting into the procedure. Methods presented here include net present value and the internal rate of return as flagships of investment valuations, but also some popular methods developed to supplement them in the best interest of the management and their decision making process.
Authors example
WE share of equity in total budget WD share of debt in total budget kE expected return on equity kD requested interested rate on debt Calculated value is accepted as a relevant project discount rate, and with respect to time value concept, every future cash flow is discounted on todays value depending on the year of the project in which it is expected. This is done by the following formula: rn = (1 + d/100)n rn discount rate for cash flow in the n-th period d calculated discount rate per year (WACC) n number of periods Higher discount rate means higher risk, and project with higher risk consequently has lower NPV. A possible situation is different discount rates for different periods, which is closer to reality.
Authors example In this example the investor insists on 5,8% return on the investment. This parameter is chosen by investors free will and can be based on opportunity rate of return like for example return on government or corporate bonds, return on a comparable project or on a bank deposit. In that way the investor sets up the discount rate at the high enough level to fulfill his profit expectations. Requested interest rate (9,3%) is specified by the creditor and cant be changed. The final number depends also on investment structure. If the investor can participate with more of his own (cheaper) funds, the WACC shall be lower respectively. The characteristic of the discount rate (d) is its exponential growth through periods. The table below shows the growth rate for our project. Table 3. Discount rates through periods
Period Discount rate cumulative 0 1,000 DISCOUNT RATE THROUGH PERIODS 1 2 3 4 5 6 1,069 1,142 1,220 1,304 1,394 1,489 7 1,592 8 1,701 9 1,818
Authors example
Example NPV The chosen cash flow has to be discounted for the chosen discount rate. The results are defined as discounted cash flows. In the fifth row of the table discounted cash flows are shown by periods. Sum of all of these values is the NPV. Table 4: Net present value
Period Net cash flow Discount rate cumulative 0 50.000 1,000 1 120.000 1,069 112.290 NET PRESENT VALUE 2 3 4 5 16.500 25.300 34.700 36.100 6 36.400 7 37.300 8 37.300 9 37.300
1,142
1,220
1,304
1,394
1,489
1,592
1,701
1,818
14.448
20.730
26.605
25.901
24.438
23.433
21.928
20.519
Authors example After adding up discounted cash flows for projects total period the NPV is calculated at 15.712 units. Regarding its positive value, it is reasonable to conclude that, as far as NPV goes, the project is acceptable.
Net cash flow in n-th period 0= Discount rate cumulative (n) For an investment project to be acceptable its IRR has to be higher than the selected discount rate- cost of capital.
Example IRR The discount rate must be adapted for the discounted cash flow to be 0 in sum. In the table that follows the sum is exactly 0, which is accomplished with the discount rate 8,91%. Table 5: Internal rate of return
8,912 Period 0 Net cash flow 50.000 Discount rate 1,000 cumulative Discounted cash flow 50.000 1 120.000 1,089 110.180 2 16.500 1,186 13.910 INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN 3 4 5 6 25.300 1,292 19.583 34.700 1,407 24.662 36.100 1,532 23.557 36.400 1,669 21.809 7 37.300 1,818 20.520 8 37.300 1,980 18.841 9 37.300 2,156 17.299
Authors example Taken into consideration that the average cost of capital is 6,87, it can be concluded that the IRR is more then 2 p.p. higher than WACC. That fact supports the decision of accepting the investment as a reasonable one.
5. Payback period
Payback period is a simple method which answers a simple question: how long will it take to pay off a project investment costs with its own returns? This is the time necessary for a project to pay off itself. Cumulative cash flow is easy to calculate simply by summing year to year cash flows until the sum overpasses 0. If the cash flow becomes positive within the reasonable (and preordered) period, the project can be accepted. If not, the project is rejected. To have a more precise result, a formula is used to define in which part of the period (for example in which month of the year) the project pays off for itself (Vidui, 2002): Cumulative cash flow at the start of the period PBP assumption = Number of periods before total payback + Cash flow in the period of coverage (payback) One of the key flaws of payback period method is that it doesnt take into consideration the time value of money. Instead it operates with regular cash flows and for that matter it is not representative enough. This method also ignores any cash inflows beyond the payback period (Meredith and Mantel, 2006.), which separates it further from NPV and IRR methods.
Authors example The payback period calculation shows that the project takes between 6 and 7 years to pay off. Following the assumption that the cash flow has a linear character, the calculation shows that the pay off time would be 6,56 years- close to 6 years and 7 months. Considering the 9 year deadline, the project qualifies as acceptable. Table 7: PBP assumption (years)
PBP ASSUMPTION (years) 6,56 Number of periods before total 6 payback Cumulative cash flow at the start 21.000 of the period Cash flow in the period of coverage (payback) 37.300
Authors example 9
Authors example The discounted payback period calculation shows that the project takes between 8 and 9 years to pay off. Following the assumption that the discounted cash flow has a linear character, the calculation shows that the pay off time would be 8,23 years- close to 8 years and 3 months. Considering the 9 year deadline, the project qualifies as acceptable even though the result was far better without discounting. Table 9: DPBP assumption (years)
DPBP ASSUMPTION (years) Number of periods before total payback Cumulative discounted cash flow at the start of the period Discounted cash flow in the period of coverage (payback) 8,23 8 4.807 20.519
Authors example
10
7. Profitability index
Another method based on facing investment cash inflows and outflows in total is profitability index, also known as PI shortly. Its difference from the NPV is in the fact that NPV is calculated on decreasing the present value of inflows for the present value of outflows, while the PI is calculated by dividing the present value of inflows with the present value of outflows. The result must be 1 or higher if the project should be accepted, as seen in the formula an in the example later on. Total discounted inflow Profitability index = Total discounted outflow Example PI Table 10: Profitability index
Period Inflow Outflow Discount rate cumulative 0 0 50.000 1,000 1 0 120.000 1,069 0 112.290 PROFITABILITY INDEX 2 3 4 5 27.300 38.400 49.200 50.800 10.800 13.100 14.500 14.700 1,142 23.905 9.457 1,220 31.464 10.734 1,304 37.723 11.118 1,394 36.447 10.547 6 51.200 14.800 1,489 34.374 9.936 7 52.100 14.800 1,592 32.731 9.298 8 52.100 14.800 1,701 30.628 8.701 9 52.100 14.800 1,818 28.660 8.142
Authors example Similar to NPV, the project cash flows are discounted to todays value. The results are total discounted inflows of 255.933 units, and total discounted outflows of 240.221 units. When dividing the first with the second variable, the result is 1,065, which is higher than 1 and makes an acceptable investment according to the PI valuation method. The project actually operates with a 6,5% profit margin. Table 11: PI calculation
PI CALCULATION Total discounted inflow Total discounted outflow PI 255.933 240.221 1,065
Authors example
11
8. Annuity method
This method describes the yearly costs of the project based on adapting the discounted cash flows on an annual level. This is accomplished by using the annuity factor and multiplying it with sum of discounted inflow on one side, and the sum of discounted outflow on the other. Annuity method is useful when comparing projects with different lifetimes. The formula for calculating the annuity factor is: (1+d/100)n x d af = (1+d/100)n - 1
Now it is necessary to calculate the inflow and the outflow annuity: AI = af * Total discounted inflow AO = af * Total discounted outflow Where n is the total period of the project. If the inflow annuity (AI) is higher than the outflow annuity (AO) the project has a bright future concerning the annuity method. AI > AO Example Annuity method Table 12: Equivalent annuity
Period Inflow Outflow Discount rate cumulative Discounted inflow Discounted outflow 0 0 50.000 1,000 0 50.000 ANNUITY METHOD 1 2 3 4 5 0 27.300 38.400 49.200 50.800 120.000 10.800 13.100 14.500 14.700 1,069 0 112.290 1,142 23.905 9.457 1,220 31.464 10.734 1,304 37.723 11.118 1,394 36.447 10.547 6 51.200 14.800 1,489 34.374 9.936 7 52.100 14.800 1,592 32.731 9.298 8 52.100 14.800 1,701 30.628 8.701 9 52.100 14.800 1,818 28.660 8.142
After discounting the cash flows it becomes obvious that the inflows outnumber the outflows. Annualizing is useful when there are projects with different lifetimes to compare (which is the purpose of annuity method). Even though, the calculations are made in this single example. The final result shows that the project is acceptable, 39.059 units on the inflow side outmatch the 36,661 of units on the outflow side. 12
Authors example
13
9. Conclusion
This review gives an insight into some of the most popular methods of analysis in investment project capital budgeting. Above mentioned methods are generally simple and easy to use, but their value is based on quality of input data. In other words and respecting the famous garbage in, garbage out principle, outcomes of the valuation are no more then mathematical results based on the assumptions of two components- the cash flow and the discount rate. When building assumptions far into the future, an investor is faced with extreme risk of being wrong. For example, when calculating ten or twenty years in advance it is practically impossible to consider all the factors that might take place in the general or investment environment, yet even those which are specifically tied to the project itself. All of these factors have to be as precisely as possible incorporated in the cash flow and in the rate by which the cash flow discounting will be made. A good financial planner has to devote his full attention to this issue. After this problem is solved in the proper manner, the investment project analysis can begin. Team members (one or more of them) who are responsible for financial analysis of the investment can begin their calculation of efficiency which is usually built up of all or most of the methods presented in the review. Some additional calculations or indexes may be included depending on the choice of the financial analyst or the request of investor, but the methods presented here are standard in investment project valuation. Regarding the initial problem of input reliability and consequently valuation of these inputs through key methods, it is necessary to ensure an additional reserve in case of deviations. This reserve is primarily seen as a contingency fee on the project's total investment value. The fee can be set as a percentage increase in the investment value, for example adding 10 percent on the sum of outflows. In that way a certain safety measure is implemented in the project. Other successful way of dealing with risks is classic sensitivity analysis which includes building case scenarios. Changing input elements like lowering cash inflows or raising outflows and discount rate can produce the foundation for worst case scenario possible for the project. This situation would be the bottom line and if the investment project would pass the efficiency test in the worst case scenario, there would be no problem in accepting the project as a desirable investment solution. As a result of here described efforts the project team would get a reliable prognosis on which they could lean on while planning project activities and afterwards when the realization of the project commences.
14
10. References
Ardalan, A. (2000); Economic and Financial Analysis for Engineering and Project Management; Technomic, Lancaster (pg. 20) DeFusco, R. A.; McLeavey, D. W.; Pinto, J. E.; Runkle, D. E. (2007); Quantitative investment analysis; CFA institute; Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (pg. 60) Helfert, E. A. (2001); Financial analysis: Tools and techniques, a guide for managers; McGraw-Hill, New York (pg. 42-43) Meredith, J. R.; Mantel, S. J. (2006); Project management; a managerial approach; Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (pg. 50) Vidui, Lj. (2002); Financijski menadment; RRiF, Zagreb (pg. 262, 282)
15