Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
o
e
oz
o
do
z
(6)
and the result of Eq. (6) gives the theoretical green density (,
g
)
expressed as
,
g
= ,
p
+(,
t
,
p
) (1 e
oz
o ) (7)
Therefore, the nal expression for the theoretical green den-
sity for any compact at any compression stage as a function
of the process parameters can be obtained by substituting Eq.
(3) into Eq. (7), hence
,
g
= ,
p
+,
c
(8)
where
,
c
= (,
t
,
p
)
_
1 exp
_
_
1 +
P
a
o
_
e
j(H2Z)
r
f +1
__
The ,
c
will be termed as the increase in densication due to
compaction or increase in density.
The effective stress ( o) in Eq. (8) is extremely important
and is greatly inuenced by the internal friction between the
powder particles (j
i
) and the geometry of the particles. For
this reason, the present analysis proposes the modication,
which was proposed previously to suit the present situation
(Al-Qureshi et al., 2005), and is given by
o = z
1
o
yc
_
1 +j
i
1 j
i
_
(9)
where o
yc
is the yield stress in compression of the bulk mate-
rial, and z is the shape factor of the particles. This ratio (z)
characterizes the surface conguration of the particle, where
the surface area of the particle should be compared with some
linear dimensions (MPIF Standard, 1994; Hausner and Mal,
1982).
As has been stated in previous works the work hardening
of the particles has direct inuence on the densication of
the powder (Jones, 1960; Lenel, 1980; Thumler and Oberacker,
1993; German, 1998; Doraivelu et al., 1984; Kuhn and Downey,
1971; Gurson, 1977). To take this effect into account in the
present theory, then clearly, the second term (,
c
) of Eq. (8),
420 j ournal of materi als processi ng technology 1 9 9 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 417424
whichcorresponds to the densicationduring the compaction
process should be raised to the power (n). Thus Eq. (8) can
nally be expressed in general form as
,
g
= ,
p
+(,
c
)
n
(10)
where n is the work-hardening exponent which is similar to
that expressed for the metallic materials. On close examina-
tion of Eqs. (8) and (10), it becomes evident that the green
density of the compact powder is inuenced by a number
of factors. These parameters play an important role in con-
trolling the presence of porosity in the compacted part. The
percentage porosity is simply dened as (Lenel, 1980; Thumler
and Oberacker, 1993; German, 1998)
U =
,
t
,
g
,
t
(11)
where ,
g
is the theoretical green density given in Eq. (10) and
may also be used as the experimental green density, when
comparison is needed.
3. Experimental procedure
In the present experiments, the raw material used was Ancorsteel 85
HP, a water-atomized pre-alloyed 0.85w/o molybdenum low-alloy steel
powder, which has high compressibility and is normally used for high
performance applications. The powder was fractioned in 6 different
classes of particle size 45150m according to MPFI standard 05. The
chemical compositions (w/o) are as follows: C<0.01, O=0.08, Mn=0.12,
and Mo=0.86. Sieves were stacked in order, with the largest mesh size
at the topandthe panat the bottom. Asample of powder weighing (50g)
was spread on the top sieve of a stack of sieves and agitated for 15min.
Inorder, the powder fractions remaining oneachsieve andcontainedin
the bottom pan were separated for classications. An electromagnetic
vibration machine was used as sieve agitator.
The conventional compactiontooling consisted of a strong cylindri-
cal container witha central hole, whichrepresentedthe diameter of the
compact part, Fig. 2. This was housed in a special cavity in a oating die
attached to the xed platen of the hydraulic testing machine. Whereas,
the upper punch was attached to the movable platen of the press, the
lower punch rested on the xed platen. The compaction process was
simply performed by lling the cylindrical space in the container with
the pre-prepared powder without lubricant, as mentioned previously.
Both the upper and the lower punches were brought into contact with
tapped powder in the cylinder. This was followed by applying an axial
load, whichcausedthe powder to be compressedfrombothends simul-
taneously, andsubjectedto highcompressive stresses. At the endof the
compaction stroke, the upper punch was removed and the lower punch
usedto eject the compact cylindrical product. Typical dimensions of the
compacted product are of 9.5mm in diameter and 151mm in height.
During the compression cycle, a trace of the axial load against the
axial displacement was provided. In addition, the radial stress on the
cylindrical wall causedbythe axial appliedpressure was measured, and
it was used to calculate the coefcient of friction between the pow-
der/cylinder wall interface (j). This information was obtained from
suitably positioned strain gauges on the outer container surface, as
shown in Fig. 2. The above procedure was repeated for other powder
classications. The green density (mass per unit volume of an unsin-
tered part) of all samples was calculated using a micrometer and digital
balance.
4. Discussion of results
The kinetic variations of the process parameters during the
compaction process make it very difcult to establish pre-
cise analysis of this technique. However, the present analysis
includes as many process parameters as possible, Eq. (8), and
they will be discussed here. Firstly, it is a known fact that the
coefcients of friction between the powder/cylinder interface
(j) and internal friction between the particles (j
i
) are not con-
stants. Clearly, these parameters must be estimatedbefore any
attempt to make any theoretical calculations using Eqs. (10)
and (11).
From the present experiments, a plot of the radial stress
as a function of the punch pressure was performed for all the
tests. It was found that the slope of these nearly linear rela-
tionship yielded an approximate value of j=0.050.25 which
depends greatly upon the lubricants used and the surface n-
ish of the tools. On the other hand, previously published work,
indicated that the value of the internal friction is approx-
imately j
i
=0.080.15. This value is an estimation, and will
be used in the present theoretical calculations (Doraivelu et
al., 1984; Kuhn and Downey, 1971; Gurson, 1977; Green, 1972;
Coube and Riedel, 2000; Shima, 2000; Zavaliangos, 2000; Li et
al., 1994; Justino et al., 2004; Al-Qureshi et al., 2005).
Fig. 2 Experimental tool for powder compaction (A) tool assembly and (B) punches and internal container.
j ournal of materi als processi ng technology 1 9 9 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 417424 421
Fig. 3 Comparison between present theoretical and
experimental results of green density for particle size of
Fe+0.85w/o molybdenum powder (150 and 45m)
(Al-Qureshi et al., 2005).
The theoretical porosity and density can be predicted from
Eqs. (10) and(11) byknowing the tapandthe bulkmaterial den-
sities, geometry of the initial and nal compacted powder, the
effective compressive stress of the bulk, friction conditions,
and by incrementing the applied pressure values. This results
in the theoretical curve of the green density as a function of
compacting pressure shown in Fig. 3. This gure reveals that
very good agreement is obtained between the theoretical val-
ues fromEq. (10) for n=1, and the experimental results for d
150
and d
45
(Al-Qureshi et al., 2005). It is clear fromFig. 3 that there
is a slight difference between the density distributions for the
powder particles of d
45
andd
150
, andbecause of the evidence it
was decided that all other comparison results would use only
the d
150
.
It is worth mentioning that the variation of the density
along the height of the compacted part is extremely essen-
tial for industrial application. Needless to say, this distribution
plays an important role in controlling the quality, and inu-
ences directly the mechanical properties of the nished part.
Therefore, it is essential to determine the density of the
compact at different heights. Consequently, the compacted
component was quase-equi sliced into segments similar to
poker chips as shown in Fig. 4, where the density and the
location were measured. In addition, to obtain the complete
theoretical green density curve, the shape factor (z) of the
particle was also determined from the scanning electron
micrographs shown in Fig. 5. Various micrographs were taken
at different locations, and the average value of the shape fac-
tor of z =0.8 was obtained for the compacted part. Using this
information together with mechanical properties, geometry,
and operational parameters of the process, the theoretical
curves can be plotted for any combination of variables. Thus,
the inuence of the powder/wall coefcient of friction on the
axial density distribution can be obtained from a plot of den-
sity at different height locations. A typical curve is shown in
Fig. 6. This gure shows the theoretical curves for various coef-
cients of friction powder/wall interface for only the upper
half of the compacted part since it is symmetrical. From close
examination of this gure, it appears that all the experimen-
tal values fall within the region j=0.050.1 of the powder/wall
Fig. 4 Typical compacted of Fe+0.85w/o molybdenum
component and sliced segments for density measurements.
Fig. 5 Scanning electron micrographs of the top surface of
the compact specimen of Fe+0.85w/o molybdenum
powder1000.
Fig. 6 Comparison between present theoretical and
experimental density results of Fe+0.85w/o molybdenum
powder for various powder/container coefcients of
friction.
422 j ournal of materi als processi ng technology 1 9 9 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 417424
Fig. 7 Comparison between present theoretical and
experimental density results of Fe+0.85w/o molybdenum
powder for various internal coefcients of friction.
interface coefcient of friction. Furthermore, the densities at
the upper and lower surfaces are denser than the middle
plane of the cylindrical component, Fig. 6, for any value of
j
i
. As mentioned earlier, this is due to the presence of the
frictional forces between the wall and the metal powder. This
behaviour is observed throughout the present experiment,
Figs. 79. Needless to say, the most outstanding feature of Fig. 6
is that the density becomes more uniform as the powder/wall
coefcient of frictiondecreases, whichreects the importance
of the surface roughness of the container and the lubricants
used.
The friction between the powder particles during com-
paction process, which is called the internal friction (j
i
), plays
an important role in the process. To demonstrate this effect,
typical theoretical curves for the density distributions for
the upper half of the compacted component as a function
of location, for various values of internal coefcient of fric-
tion (j
i
=0.050.20) are shown in Fig. 7. From examination of
these curves, it is clear that the effect of the internal friction
becomes evident particularly in the last stages of the com-
Fig. 8 Comparison between present theoretical and
experimental density results of Fe+0.85w/o molybdenum
powder for various shape factors of particles.
Fig. 9 Comparison between present theoretical and
experimental density results of Fe+0.85w/o molybdenum
powder using different applied axial pressures.
Fig. 10 Comparison between present theoretical and
experimental porosity results for particle size of 150m for
various work-hardening exponents.
paction process. Hence to reduce the percentage of pores and
make the product denser, it is essential to add good solid lubri-
cant to the compact beforehand. Also, the experimental curve
is situated well within the accepted internal friction region.
It is also clear from Eq. (9) that the effective stress of
the bulk material plays a major role in controlling the green
density and the porosity of the nal product, which is conse-
quently inuenced directly by the shape factor of the particles.
The shape factor, which was discussed previously and mea-
sured, dominates these properties, Fig. 5 (MPIF Standard, 1994;
Hausner and Mal, 1982). Typical theoretical curves for various
values of shape factor are shown in Fig. 8. The gure demon-
strates that nearly regular and equi-shaped particles produce
better density distribution with the minimum porosity of the
j ournal of materi als processi ng technology 1 9 9 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 417424 423
Fig. 11 Comparison between present theoretical and
experimental porosity results of ne iron powder (Lenel,
1980), with work-hardening effect, n=0.98.
product. Also, it is evident that the higher the applied pressure
the denser the product becomes, as shown in Fig. 9.
In addition, the present analysis examines the effect of the
work hardening of the particle during the last stage of com-
paction. This behaviour is known to have some inuence on
the nal compact density and porosity, but was not accounted
for in the previous mathematical considerations (Doraivelu et
al., 1984; Kuhn and Downey, 1971; Gurson, 1977; Green, 1972;
Coube and Riedel, 2000; Shima, 2000; Zavaliangos, 2000; Li et
al., 1994; Justino et al., 2004; Al-Qureshi et al., 2005). The inu-
ence of work hardening can be demonstrated by plotting a
curve of porosity (U%) as a function of compaction pressure
(p), given in Eqs. (10) and (11), for various values of (n). On close
examination of Fig. 10, it becomes evident that the theoreti-
cal and the experimental curves are closely tted and divert in
the nal stages of compaction, and are best tted for the value
of n=0.96. In addition, other published experimental work is
reproduced here for comparison purposes with the present
theoretical results, and are plotted in Figs. 1113, for different
metallic powders (Lenel, 1980; Li et al., 1994). Clearly, these
gures demonstrate the versatility of the predicted values
from the present theoretical analysis. It can also be observed
that non-ferrous powders have to undergo more plastic defor-
mation than the ferrous powders. As a whole, however, the
work hardening of the particle has an inuence on the den-
sication of the compact, particularly in the last stages of
the compaction process. Also, work hardening leads to an
increase in the hardness of the particles, which makes den-
sication more difcult in subsequent stages of compaction.
The present analysis points out that should the micro struc-
tural state require improvement, annealed powder or heat
treatment can be adopted.
Fig. 12 Comparison between present theoretical and
experimental porosity results of ne copper powder (Lenel,
1980), with work-hardening effect, n=0.97.
Fig. 13 Comparison between present theoretical and
experimental results for pure Ni powder (Li et al., 1994),
with work-hardening effect, n=0.93.
424 j ournal of materi als processi ng technology 1 9 9 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 417424
Fig. 14 Comparison between present theoretical and
experimental porosity results for particle size of 150m for
various internal coefcients of frictions.
As mentioned earlier, the use of good solid lubricant will
lead to a better densication and less porosity in the product,
as shown in Fig. 14. This technique may be utilized as a tool
for testing the quality of the solid lubricants used.
5. Conclusions
The present theory derives expressions to predict the green
density and the porosity of the compacted part for any given
geometry and powder. All the examined known parameters
have remarkable inuence on the nal densication and the
reduction of porosity of the product. The excellent agreement
between the experimental and the theoretical results makes
the present theory more reliable to be employed for the ini-
tial stages of development of tools. This eventually will lead
to the optimization steps to improve the nal properties of
the produced part as well as the tooling life. The use of this
theory will help to reduce the number of experiments needed
for qualifying the compacted part of the required density and
porosity. In addition, this method is put forward as a tech-
nique for testing the quality of the solid lubricants, which will
evidently reduce time consuming experiments and costs dur-
ing the development of a new component. Also, it is worth
mentioning, that care must be taken in estimating the yield
stress, coefcients of frictions, and other relevant parameters
otherwise this may lead to modifying the nal component
densication.
Finally, the present analysis is mainly based on solid
mechanics approach, which is less costly to apply than the
sophisticated FEM, particularly during the initial phases of
development of new components by this P/M process.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank UFSC-LabMat and Fras-le for the
use of the facilities and CNPq and FINEP for partially nanc-
ing the project and grants for two authors. Thanks are also
extended to Dr. H.C. Pavanati, Mr. D. Binder, Mr. N.A.A. Hus-
sein, Mr. A. Casaril and Mr. E.R. Gomes for their assistance.
r e f e r e nce s
Al-Qureshi, H.A., Galiotto, A., Klein, A.N., 2005. On the mechanics
of cold die compaction for powder metallurgy. J. Mater.
Process. Technol. 166, 135143.
Coube, O., Riedel, H., 2000. Numerical simulation of metal powder
die compaction with special consideration of cracking.
Powder Metall. 43 (2), 123131.
Doraivelu, S.M., Gegel, S.L., Gunasekera, J.S., Malas, J.C., Morgan,
J.T., 1984. A new yield function for compressible P/M
materials. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 26 (910), 527535.
Fischmeister, H.F., 1982. Powder compaction: fundamentals and
recent developments. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 196 (18), 105121.
German, R.M., 1998. Powder Metallurgy of Iron and Steel. John
Wiley & Sons Inc.
Green, R.J., 1972. Plasticity theory for porous solids. Int. J. Mech.
Sci. 14, 215225.
Gurson, A.L., 1977. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void
nucleation and growth: Part I. Yield criteria and ow rules for
porous ductile media. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 99, 215.
Hausner, H.H., Mal, M.K., 1982. Handbook of Powder Metallurgy.
Chemical Publishing Co., New York.
Jones, W.D., 1960. Fundamental Principles of Powder Metallurgy.
Edward Aronold, London.
Justino, J.G., Alves, M.K., Klein, A.N., Al-Qureshi, H.A., 2004.
Constitutive model for the elastic-plastic analysis of porous
sintered materials. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44 (2/3), 307316.
Kuhn, H.A., Downey, C.L., 1971. Deformation characteristics and
plasticity theory of sintered powder materials. Int. J. Powder
Metall. 7 (1), 1525.
Lenel, F.V., 1980. Powder Metallurgy: Principles and Applications.
American Powder Metallurgy Institute, New York.
Li, S., Khosrovabadi, P.B., Kolster, B.H., 1994. New Compaction
equation for powder materials. Int. J. Powder Metall. 30 (1),
4757.
MPIF Standard 35, 1994. Materials Standards For P/M Structural
Parts. Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, USA.
Parker, D.A., 1985. Ceramics technology: application to engine
components. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 199 (84), 116.
Shima, S., 2000. Finite element simulation of compaction. Int. J.
Powder Metall. 38 (2), 4147.
Thumler, F., Oberacker, R., 1993. An Introduction to Powder
Metallurgy. The University Press, Cambridge.
Zavaliangos, A., 2000. Constitutive models for the simulation of
P/M processes. Int. J. Powder Metall. 38 (2), 2739.