Sie sind auf Seite 1von 10

Term Structure Facts to Be Explained

Chapter 5
How Do The Risk and Term Structure Affect Interest Rates Part B
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_cAxh44aNQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFp6jk3zBhg

Besides explaining the shape of the yield curve, a good theory must explain why: Interest rates for different maturities move together. Yield curves tend to have steep upward slope when short rates are low and downward slope when short rates are high. Yield curve is typically upward sloping.
5-2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqKWcZTtxwg

Three Theories of Term Structure

Expectations Theory
Key Assumption: Bonds of different maturities are perfect substitutes Implication: Re on bonds of different maturities are equal

1. Expectations Theory
Pure Expectations Theory explains 1 and 2, but not 3 Market Segmentation Theory explains 3, but not 1 and 2 Solution: Combine features of both Pure Expectations Theory and Market Segmentation Theory to get Liquidity Premium Theory and explain all facts
5-3

2. Market Segmentation Theory

3. Liquidity Premium Theory

5-4

Expectations Theory
To illustrate what this means, consider two alternative investment strategies for a twoyear time horizon.
1. Buy $1 of one-year bond, and when it matures, buy another one-year bond with your money. 2. Buy $1 of two-year bond and hold it.

Expectations Theory
The important point of this theory is that if the Expectations Theory is correct, your expected wealth is the same (a the start) for both strategies. Of course, your actual wealth may differ, if rates change unexpectedly after a year. We show the details of this in the next few slides.
5-5 5-6

Expectations Theory - Notation


We use zero-coupon bonds for this analysis to avoid the need to make reinvestment assumptions Zero coupon rates are spot rates We will designate spot rates as S1, S2, S3 etc. where S1 = a one-year bond We will designate forward rates (rates for periods that start in the future, not today) as 1f1, 1f2, 2f1 etc.
2f1

Expectations Theory
Expected return from strategy 1

(1+ it )(1+ ite+1 ) 1 = 1+ it + ite+1 + it (ite+1 ) 1


(1+S1)(1+ 1f1) = Ending Balance (End Balance/Beginning Balance)-1 = HPR (1+ HPR)^.5-1 = S2 = expected return
Since it(iet+1) is also extremely small, expected return is approximately it + iet+1
5-7 5-8

= the two-year forward rate starting one year from now the one-year forward rate starting two years from now

1f2 =

Expectations Theory
Expected return from strategy 1

Expectations Theory
Expected return from strategy 2

(1+S1)(1+ 1f1) = Ending Balance (End Balance/Beginning Balance)-1 = HPR (1+ HPR)^.5-1 = S2 = expected return (annualized)
S1 S2 0 1
1f1

(1+ i2t )(1+ i2t ) 1 = 1+ 2(i2t ) + (i2t )2 1


Since (i2t)2 is extremely small, expected return is approximately 2(i2t)

S2 2
5-9

(1+S2)(1+ S2) = Ending Balance (End Balance/Beginning Balance)-1 = HPR (1+ HPR)^.5-1 = S2 = expected return (annualized)
S2 0 1 S2 2
5-10

Expectations Theory
From implication above expected returns of two strategies are equal Therefore

Expectations Theory
From implication above expected returns of two strategies are equal Therefore (1+S2)(1+ S2)-1 = (1+S1)(1+ 1f1)-1
Solving for 1f1
1f1

2(i2t ) = it + i
Solving for i2t

e t +1

= ((1+S2)(1+ S2))/(1+S1) 1 = (End Balance/Beg Balance)-1


(1)

i2t =

it + ite+1 2

(1)

1f1

Note that 1f1 is a HPR. We do not need to annualize It because it is exactly a one-year period

5-11

5-12

Annualizing HPR
Remember that if we did need to annualize, we would use our same formula as always:

Expectations Theory Example 1


Assume S1 = 5% and S2 = 7%, solve for 1f1:
1f1 1f1

= ((1+S2)(1+ S2))/(1+S1) 1 = (End Balance/Beginning Balance)-1 = ((1+.07)(1+ .07))/(1+.05) 1 = 1.14490/1.05000 -1 = 1.0904 -1 = .0904
S1 = 5% S2 = 7%
1f1 =

(1+HPR)^(# of HPs in one year)

1f1 1f1

S2 = 7% 1 2
5-14

5-13

Expectations Theory Example 2


Assume S1 = 5% S3 = 10% 1f1 = 9.04%, solve for 1f2:
1f2 1f2 1f2 1f2 2f1 hpr 2f1 hpr 2f1 hpr 2f1 hpr 2f1

Expectations Theory Example 3


Assume S1 = 4% S3 = 6%, solve for 2f1:

= ((1+S3)(1+ S3)(1+S3)/(1+S1)(1+1f1) 1 = (End Balance/Beginning Balance)-1 = ((1+.10)(1+ .010)(1+.10))/(1+.05)(1.0904) 1 = 1.3310/1.1449 -1 = 1.1625 -1 = .1625
S1 = 5% S3 = 10%
1f1 =

= ((1+S3)(1+ S3)(1+S3)/(1+S1) 1 = (End Balance/Beginning Balance)-1 = ((1+.06)(1+ .06)(1+.06))/(1+.04) 1 = 1.19102/1.04 -1 = 1.14521 -1 = .14521
2f1 =

= (1+.14521)^.5 -1 = .07014 annualized


S1 = 4% S3 = 6% ?
2f1 =

9.04

1f2 =

S3 = 10% 1 2

S3 = 10%
5-15

S3 = 6% 1 2

S3 = 6%
5-16

Expectations Theory Example 4


Assume S1 = 4% 1f1 = 4.5% 1f2 = 5.2% solve for S3

Expectations Theory and Term Structure Facts


Explains why yield curve has different slopes
1. When short rates are expected to rise in future, average of future short rates = int is above today's short rate; therefore yield curve is upward sloping. 2. When short rates expected to stay same in future, average of future short rates same as today's, and yield curve is flat. 3. Only when short rates expected to fall will yield curve be downward sloping.

S3 hpr = ((1+S1)(1+ 1f1)(1+1f2)) 1 S3 hpr = ((1.04)(1.045)(1.052)-1 = (1.14331) -1 =.14331 S3 = (1.14331)^(1/3) 1 = .04566 annualized

S1 = 4% S3 = ? 0 1

1f1 =

4.5%

1f2 =

5.2%

S3 = ? 2

S3 = ?
5-17 5-18

Expectations Theory and Term Structure Facts Pure expectations theory explains fact 1 that short and long rates move together
1. Short rate rises are persistent etc. 2. If it today, average of future rates int iet+1, iet+2 3. Therefore: it int (i.e., short and long rates move together)
5-19

Expectations Theory and Term Structure Facts


Explains fact 2that yield curves tend to have steep slope when short rates are low and downward slope when short rates are high
1. When short rates are low, they are expected to rise to normal level, and long rate = average of future short rates will be well above today's short rate; yield curve will have steep upward slope. 2. When short rates are high, they will be expected to fall in future, and long rate will be below current short rate; yield curve will have downward slope.
5-20

Expectations Theory and Term Structure Facts Doesn't explain fact 3that yield curve usually has upward slope
Short rates are as likely to fall in future as rise, so average of expected future short rates will not usually be higher than current short rate: therefore, yield curve will not usually slope upward.

Market Segmentation Theory


Key Assumption: Implication: Bonds of different maturities are not substitutes at all Markets are completely segmented; interest rate at each maturity are determined separately

5-21

5-22

Market Segmentation Theory


Explains fact 3that yield curve is usually upward sloping
People typically prefer short holding periods and thus have higher demand for short-term bonds, which have higher prices and lower interest rates than long bonds

Liquidity Premium Theory


Key Assumption: Bonds of different maturities are substitutes, but are not perfect substitutes Modifies Pure Expectations Theory with features of Market Segmentation Theory

Implication:

Does not explain fact 1or fact 2 because its assumes long-term and short-term rates are determined independently.

5-23

5-24

Liquidity Premium Theory


Investors prefer short-term rather than long-term bonds. This implies that investors must be paid positive liquidity premium, int, to hold long term bonds.

Liquidity Premium Theory


Modifies the expectations theory Forward rates will be lower than calculated by the expectations theory Helps to explain the recurring upward slope

5-25

5-26

Liquidity Premium Theory

Numerical Example
1. One-year interest rate over the next five years: 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, and 9% 2. Investors' preferences for holding shortterm bonds so liquidity premium for oneto five-year bonds: 0%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1.0%

5-27

5-28

Numerical Example (Simplified)


Interest rate on the two-year bond: 0.25% + (5% + 6%)/2 = 5.75% Interest rate on the five-year bond: 1.0% + (5% + 6% + 7% + 8% + 9%)/5 = 8% Interest rates on one to five-year bonds: 5%, 5.75%, 6.5%, 7.25%, and 8% Comparing with those for the pure expectations theory, liquidity premium theory produces yield curves more steeply upward sloped
5-29

Liquidity Premium Theory: Term Structure Facts Explains All 3 Facts


Explains fact 3that usual upward sloped yield curve by liquidity premium for long-term bonds Explains fact 1 and fact 2 using same explanations as pure expectations theory because it has average of future short rates as determinant of long rate

5-30

Liquidity Premium Theory


There is no easy way to observe the level of liquidity premium(s) One could statistically analyze past yield curve shapes In any case from a trading standpoint, you may be able to harvest the premium

Market Predictions of Future Short Rates

5-31

Evidence on the Term Structure


Initial research (early 1980s) found little useful information in the yield curve for predicting future interest rates. Recently, more discriminating tests show that the yield curve has a lot of information about very short-term and long-term rates, but says little about medium-term rates.

Case: Interpreting Yield Curves


The picture on the next slide illustrates several yield curves that we have observed for U.S. Treasury securities in recent years. What do they tell us about the publics expectations of future rates?

5-33

5-34

Case: Interpreting Yield Curves, 1980 2008

Case: Interpreting Yield Curves


The steep downward curve in 1981 suggested that short-term rates were expected to decline in the near future. This played-out, with rates dropping by 300 bps in 3 months. The upward curve in 1985 suggested a rate increase in the near future.

5-35

5-36

Case: Interpreting Yield Curves


The slightly upward slopes in the remaining years can be explained by liquidity premiums. Short-term rates were stable, with longer-term rates including a liquidity premium (explaining the upward slope).

Mini-case: The Yield Curve as a Forecasting Tool The yield curve does have information about future interest rates, and so it should also help forecast inflation and real output production.
Rising (falling) rates are associated with economic booms (recessions) [chapter 4]. Rates are composed of both real rates and inflation expectations [chapter 3].
5-37 5-38

Chapter Summary
Risk Structure of Interest Rates: We examine the key components of risk in debt: default, liquidity, and taxes. Term Structure of Interest Rates: We examined the various shapes the yield curve can take, theories to explain this, and predictions of future interest rates based on the theories.
5-39

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen