Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
My sincere thanks to Mr. Amit Varma (President - Corporate Strategy, JK Organisation) for his valuable guidance, continuous encouragement and tremendous patience in discussing my problems in bringing this project report to shape. I am also thankful to Mr. Sameer Seth (Senior Strategic Officer, JK Organisation) and Mr. Ankit Suri (Officer, Corporate Strategy, JK Organisation) for their support, guidance and cooperation during my training. I also express deep sense of gratitude to my institutional guide, Dr. Biraj Kumar Mohanty (Professor) for providing me essential background to the project. I also extend my thanks to all other employees of JK Organisation and my University for providing me the platform to undertake this project.
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ......................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary............................................................................................. 5 Scope of the Project ............................................................................................ 6 OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................................... 7 Definitions: ......................................................................................................... 7 About The Tyre ................................................................................................... 8 Etymology and spelling ................................................................................... 8 History of the Tyre .......................................................................................... 9 Advancements of Tyres ................................................................................. 11 Technical advancement in Tyres ................................................................... 12 Tyre Manufacturing ...................................................................................... 13 Raw Materials Required ................................................................................ 13 Process Flow ................................................................................................. 13 Functional Characteristics of a Tyre .............................................................. 17 Construction of a Tyre ................................................................................... 18 World Tyre Industry .......................................................................................... 20 INDIAN TYRE INDUSTRY .................................................................................... 25 Background ................................................................................................... 25 Key Features ................................................................................................. 26 Evolutionary Phases of Tyre manufacturing in India ..................................... 29 INDUSTRY SIZE AND TRENDS OF GROWTH ........................................................ 30 Major Tyre Projects Completed/Scheduled for Completion during 2010-2011 ...................................................................................................................... 32 Growth of Indian Tyre Industry ..................................................................... 34
Executive Summary
The profitability of Tyre Industry has gained worldwide attention. The industry has evolved from being strictly regulated to global outsourcing destination. This report A Study of Low Cost Country Sourcing by International Tyre Industries attempts to explore the trends of investments of International Tyre companies in Low Cost Countries. The facts identified through this report are The companies which are sourcing from Low Cost Country are able to cut the manufacturing costs. Majority of the companies are choosing Asian countries for sourcing their tyres. Of the many Low Cost Countries China has emerged as a preferred destination for all the companies.
OBJECTIVE
This project is to explore the trends of investments of international Tyre companies in Low Cost Countries during the period 1999-2011. The other objectives of this project are to explore the reasons of outsourcing of tyres from Low Cost Countries. This project is also intended to find out the segments and countries which attracted majority of investments from the International tyre Companies.
Definitions:
1. Low Cost Country A country where the cost of manufacturing a particular product is less compared to countries which produce the similar product at a very high cost. 2. Sourcing It is a term used to describe the practice of procuring goods and services from the global market across geographical boundaries. 3. Low Cost Country sourcing It is a procurement strategy in which a company sources materials, which it cannot produce, from the host which has abundant supply of factor of production with low labour and production cost in order to reduce operating expenses.
rapid dynamism, all the companies worldwide are tuning their focuses on the customer. Suddenly, the customer had succeeded in capturing all the attention of the companies towards him, so much so, that the once famous maxim, customer is the god has become so true and relevant today. There has been a paradigm shift in the thinking of these companies and none other than the customer has brought this about. Earlier there was a sellers market, since goods and services were in 9
10
Advancements of Tyres
Iron tyres The earliest tyres were bands of iron (later steel), placed on wooden wheels, used on carts and wagons. The tyre would be heated in a forge fire, placed over the wheel and quenched, causing the metal to contract and fit tightly on the wheel. A skilled worker, known as a wheelwright, carried out this work. The outer ring served to "tie" the wheel segments together for use, providing also a wear-resistant surface to the perimeter of the wheel. The word "tyre" thus emerged as a variant spelling to refer to the metal bands used to tie wheels. Rubber tyres The first practical pneumatic tyre was made by John Boyd Dunlop, a Scot, in 1887 for his son's bicycle, in an effort to prevent the headaches his son had while riding on rough roads (Dunlop's patent was later declared invalid because of prior art by fellow Scot Robert William Thomson). Dunlop is credited with "realizing rubber could withstand the wear and tear of being a tyre while retaining its resilience. Pneumatic tyres are made of a flexible elastomeric material, such as rubber, with reinforcing materials such as fabric and wire. Tyre companies were first started in the early 20th century, and grew in tandem with the auto industry. Today, over 1 billion tyres are produced annually, in over 400 tyre factories, with the three top tyre makers commanding a 60% global market share.
11
12
Tyre Manufacturing
Raw Materials Required
Natural rubber - Imparts heat resistance Poly Butadiene Rubber (PBR) -Imparts abrasion resistance Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR) - Imparts road grip Nylon Tyre Cord (NTC) fabric - Imparts reinforcement strength
Process Flow
Mixing the material The tyre manufacturing process begins with the preparation of a rubber compound. A pre-defined raw material mix of elastomers, carbon black, rubber chemicals and processing oils is mixed in a Banbury mixer. Processing oils ensure that the raw materials are properly mixed. Raw materials are mixed at a high temperature in the first stage and temperatures are lowered in the second. In the third stage, sulphur is added at a specified temperature and time parameters. These specifications vary for different tyre categories. The rubber compound obtained from the mixer is in the form of rubber sheets, which enables easy handling of the compound. The rubber sheets are used to make the tread, ply/band and bead. Side-wall making Rubber sheets are extruded through a die opening, at a specified pressure and temperature. The extruded sheets are cut to obtain treads, with a specific profile and gauge.
13
14
The two main types of tyre-curing processes are the conventional process (air bag curing process) and the Bag-o-Matic process. In the conventional process, air bags are used, while the Bag-o-Matic process uses bladders. TheBag-o-Matic process is widely used due to the shorter curing cycle, low labour requirements and lower costs.
15
The green tyre is kept in a mould, and heated using steam (a specific mould is used for each tyre category).Molten rubber from the tread flows into the mould, and results in the formation of grooves on the tread.
Subsequently, the green tyre is allowed to cool in an inflated condition, which is called 'post cure inflation'. This is done to overcome the shrinkage properties of nylon tyre cord. Final inspection A final quality inspection is conducted on the cured tyre for air pockets and other defects.
16
17
Construction of a Tyre
Ply and band: Ply is a continuous layer of parallel rubber coated cord fabric. The cords are bias-cut into plies, by a bias cutting machine. A ply has a specific angle and width. Bias-cut plies are used to make bands. The bias-cut plies that are joined in a cross angle, form a band. Tread: It comes in direct contact with the road surface. Sidewall:
18
19
115
80
60 40 20 0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
The World Tyre Industry is dominated by 10 major players. They are represented in the following table. Rank as per Turnover 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Company Turnover In 2010 (Billion $) 38.9 28.8 22.7 12.2 7.9 6.8 5 4.6 3.4 3.1 5 year CAGR (%) 3.7 2.9 4.5 5 6.8 8 5.8 4 12 5.5 Market Share (%) 16.2 15.5 12.4 5.1 3.7 4.4 3.1 3 2.2 1.8 No of Brands 11 16 28 22 6 7 2 4 12 2 20
Bridgestone Michelin Goodyear Continental Sumitomo Pirelli Yokohama Hankook Cooper Toyo
The overview of the major companies is as follows 1. Bridgestone Bridgestone is the world leader of Tyre Industry, headquartered at Tokyo, Japan. Revenue of the company is $38 billion in 2010.It has sales CAGR of 3.7%. It has 47 Tyre manufacturing plants and sells over 150 countries. It manufactures tyres for all kind of vehicles such as passenger cars, construction and mining vehicles, commercial vehicles, aircraft, motorcycles and scooters, racing cars, karts, utility carts, subways, monorail. 2. Michelin
Michelin was established in 1905 in London. It is active on all continents and in more than 170 countries. Revenue of the company is $28.8 billion in 2010. It is growing with sales CAGR of 2.9%.
Michelin manufactures and sells tyres for all kinds of vehicles, including cars, vans, 4X4, SUV and many more.
The famous icon 'The Michelin Man' has been the drivers companion since 1898 and was voted as the "Best Logo Symbol of all time" in 2000, by a worldwide panel for the Financial Times.
21
5. Goodyear It is the largest tyre manufacturer in USA. Its revenue is 18.8 billion $ in 2010 with sales CAGR of 4.5%. Goodyear production began on the 21st November 1898. Today, It is one of the world's leading tyre companies; No. 1 tyre manufacturer in North
22
7. Pirell Pirelli Tyre is the world's fifth largest operator in the tyre market with revenue of $6.8 billion with sales CAGR of 8%. Pirelli is one of the worlds best known Italian brand names. It has 24 manufacturing plants in 12 countries and a commercial presence in more than 160 countries. 8. Sumitomo A Sumitomo Rubber industry is the second largest Japanese with revenue of $7.9 billion in 2010. Sumitomo Tire is a premium tire brand in Asia. Sumitomo is known for innovative design and superior quality.
23
9. Toyo It is a Japanese company with 16 plants across Japan. It is expanding in North America, China and Malaysia. It is growing with a CAGR of 5.5%
10.Yokohama It is a South Korean company with revenue of 5 billion $ in 2010. It grows with a CAGR of 3.3% It has 5 manufacturing locations in Japan, 3 in China, 2 in Thailand, 1 in USA, South Korea, Philippines, and Vietnam.
24
The origin of the Indian Tyre Industry dates back to 1926 when Dunlop Rubber Limited set up the first tyre company in West Bengal. MRF followed suit in 1946. Since then, the Indian tyre industry has grown rapidly. Transportation industry and tyre industry go hand in hand as the two are interdependent. Transportation industry has experienced 10% growth rate year after year with an absolute level of 870 billion ton freight. With an extensive road network of 3.2 million km, road accounts for over 85% of all freight movement in India. Technology generation in the Indian tyre industry has witnessed a fair amount of expertise and versatility to absorb, adapt and modify international technology to suit Indian conditions. This is reflected in the swift technology progression from cotton (reinforcement) carcass to high-performance radial tyres in a span of four decades. Globalization has led to the linking of the economies of all the nations and therefore major Indian players in the tyre industry are pursuing global strategies to enhance their competitiveness in world markets. The present section broadly undertakes an overview of the Indian tyre industry through an examination of its growth trends with respect to production, exports and acquisition of technological capabilities.
25
Key Features
At present there are more than 40 listed companies in the tyre sector in India. Major players are MRF, JK Tyres, and Apollo Tyres & CEAT, which account for 63 per cent of the organized tyre market. The other key players include Modi Rubber, Kesoram Industriesand Goodyear India, with 11 per cent, 7 per cent and 6 per cent share respectively. Dunlop , Falcon, Tyre Corporation of India Limited (TCIL), TVS-Srichakra, Metro Tyres and Balkrishna Tyres are some of the other significant players in the industry. While the tyre industry is largely dominated by the organized sector, the unorganized sector is predominant with respect to bicycle tyres. The industry is a major consumer of the domestic rubber market. Natural rubber constitutes 80% while synthetic rubber constitutes only 20% of the material content in Indian tyres. Interestingly, world-wide, the proportion of natural to synthetic rubber in tyres is 30:70. The sector is raw-material intensive, with raw material accounting for 70% of the total costs of production Current level of radialization includes 95% for all passenger car tyres, 12% for light commercial vehicles and 3% for heavy vehicles (truck and bus) Restrictions were placed on import of used /retreaded tyres since April 2006 Import of new tyres & tubes is freely allowed, except for radial tyres in the truck/bus segment which has been placed in the restricted list since November 2008 The major factors affecting the demand for tyres include the level of industrial activity, availability and cost of credit, transportation volumes and network of roads, execution of vehicle loading rules, radialization, retreading and exports.
26
Entry Barriers: High The entry barriers are high for the tyre industry. It is a highly capital intensive industry. A plant with an annual capacity of 1.5 million cross-ply tyres costs between Rs.4,000 and Rs. 5,000 million. A similar plant producing radial tyres costs Rs. 8,000 million.
Bargaining Power of the Buyers: High The OEMs have total control over prices. In fact, the OEMs faced with declining profitability have also reduced the number of component suppliers to make the supply chain more efficient. Inter Firm Rivalry: Low The tyre industry in India is fairly concentrated, with the top eight companies accounting for more than 80% of the total production of tyres. Threat of Substitutes: Low but Increasing,
27
28
Period Characteristics
1920-35 No domestic production. Demand met through imports. Key players included Dunlop (U.K), Firestone & Goodyear (USA)
Policy Regime
Liberal imports
(development) Phase II
1936-60
Domestic production begins by erstwhile trading companies: Dunlop, Firestone, Goodyear and India Tyre & Rubber Company
1961-74
Indian companies-MRF, Premier & Regulation on capacity Incheck- enter manufacturing sector with foreign technology; licensing of additional production capacity expansion and repatriation of profits of foreign companies; enforcement of export obligation on MNC; protection from external competition
Phase IV
1975-91
Entry of large Indian business houses like Singhania & Modi & technical collaborations with MNCs, introduction of radial tyres, vertical integration and exponential growth in tyre production & exports
Delicensing of production, placing of imports under OGL with tariff & nontariff barriers
(modernization) Phase V
1992 onwards
External trade liberalization & reduction in import duty; re-entry of MNCs either independently or in collaboration with Indian capital
29
ICRA estimates the total installed domestic tyre capacity to increase by more than 47% from 122 million tyres in 2009-10 to around 180 million tyres by 2012-13 In line with demand trends, the TBR segment is expected .to attract the highest share of investments (over 50%) over the next three years followed by the PCR segment. Given the strong demand expectations from the domestic auto industry and the possibility of some delays in project implementation, we expect utilisation levels to remain high over the medium term, especially in the TBR segment. This incremental domestic capacity is, however, expected to
30
31
Company
Project
Product
Capacity Unit
MRF
Medak
Pcr+2w
26.7
Trichy
PCR
7.0
Lac/annu 900 m
Jan11
CEAT
50 40 1.7
Oct10
Oct10
Ambeanath SPECIALITY TYRES APOOLO Orangadam TBR Orangadam PCR FALCON Mysore 2W
200
Tons/day 140
Dec12
6000 8000 60
No/day No/day
2300
Lac/annu 300 m
Uttranchal
2W/3W
Lac/annu 570 m
May12
85 80
Lac/annu 1000
32
33
CATEGORY Truck & Bus Passenger Car Jeep Light Comml. Veh. (L.C.V.)
2004 - 05 2005 - 06 2006 - 07 11092 11862 1462 3945 1311 1096 408 197 9992 18127 124 377 89 0 60082 11941 13605 1272 4529 1383 1134 596 325 9519 21053 55 514 106 0 66032 12367 14264 1368 4820 1754 1296 823 381 9643 26079 0* 635 115 0 73545
Tractor Front 1148 Tractor Rear Tractor Trailer A.D.V. Scooter Motor Cycle Moped Industrial O.T.R. Aero TOTAL 842 415 295 9274 16688 168 295 74 0 54690
The Indian Tyre industry is expected to show a healthy growth rate of 9-10% over the next five years, according to a study by Credit Analysis and Research Limited (CARE). While the truck and bus tyres are set to register a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8%, the light commercial vehicles (LCV) segment is expected to show a CAGR of about 14 %.
35
Competitive analysis of major players of Indian tyre industry Market share in 2010-11
others 2% 2% JK 16% birla 14%
MRF 21%
apollo 22%
ceat13% 13%
POSITION OF THE COMPANY In terms of sales JK stood at the third position after Apollo and MRF with 16% of total market share of Indian tyre industry. Percentage share of the various companies in different tyre segments by production Company T&b Pass. Lcv Tractor rear Apollo 21 24 23 16 Birla 18 1 8 8 Bridgestone 0 19 0 0 Ceat 13 2 13 7 Falcon 0 0 0 1 Goodyear 0 13 0 35 Jk 22 14 18 7 Metro 0 0 0 0 Modi 4 0 0 0 Mrf 21 24 27 25 Tvs 0 0 0 0 Others 1 3 11 1 Tractor front 10 6 0 8 4 22 6 0 0 26 0 17 Tractor trailor 7 0 0 9 0 0 5 0 0 8 0 71 otr 2w/3w Motor cycle 1 0 0 6 0 7 0 0 0 25 9 8 0 14 19 4 0 0 28 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 27 29 27 0 22 24 9 23 13 36
Financial Analysis
The following Liquidity ratios, Activity ratios and Profitability ratios are explained under
2. Profitability ratios Net Profit Margin Gross Profit Margin Return on long term funds
3. Coverage & Leverage ratios Debt to Equity Owners fund as % of total source Fixed asset turnover ratio
37
Liquidity ratiosLiquidity ratios provide information about a firm's ability to meet its short-term financial obligations. They are of particular interest to those extending shortterm credit to the firm. We will be here seeing three of the liquidity ratios for the company and analyzing them. Current Ratio Current ratio is a financial ratio that measures whether or not a company has enough resources to pay its debt over the next business cycle (usually 12 months) by comparing firm's current assets to its current liabilities. Current ratio = current assets / current liability 2010 JK APOLLO 0.98 1.10 2009 1.18 1.30 2008 1.16 1.28
If current ratio is bellow 1 (current liabilities exceed current assets), then the company may have problems paying its bills on time. However, low values do not indicate a critical problem but should concern the management
2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2010 2009 2008 apollo jk tyres
As we can see that JKs current ratio is below 1 at 2010 it means they dont have enough current assets to meet its current liability. On the other hand Apollo performed well at every year having the current ratio above 1. 38
Both the companies are not performing well in the case of quick ratio because it should be in the ratio of 1:1. . A quick ratio higher than 1:1 indicates that the business can meet its current financial obligations with the available quick
39
This ratio should be compared against industry averages. A low turnover implies poor sales and, therefore, excess inventory. A high ratio implies either strong sales or ineffective buying.
Profitability Ratios
These ratios, much like the operational performance ratios, give users a good understanding of how well the company utilized its resources in generating profit and value.
The long-term profitability of a company is vital for both the survivability of the company as well as the benefit received by
40
10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% 2010 2009 2008 JK tyres Apollo
41
Gross Profit Margin By subtracting selling, general and administrative (SG&A), or operating, expenses from a company's gross profit number, we get operating income. Management has much more control over operating expenses than its cost of sales outlays. Thus, investors need to scrutinize the operating profit margin carefully. Positive and negative trends in this ratio are, for the most part, directly attributable to management decisions. A company's operating income figure is often the preferred metric (deemed to be more reliable) of investment analysts, versus its net income figure, for making inter-company comparisons and financial projections. Gross profit margin = (Gross profit / net sales) * 100 2010 JK tyres Apollo 10.14% 13.76% 2009 4.72% 6.31% 2008 6.58% 10.85%
42
40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 2010 2009 2008 JK tyres Apollo
We can see that for this ratio JK is performing well as compared to the Apollo. It means that the JK is operating in a very good condition.
2. Leverage Ratio
Financial leverage ratios provide an indication of the long-term solvency of the firm. Unlike liquidity ratios that are concerned with short-term assets and liabilities, financial leverage ratios measure the extent to which the firm is using long term debt. 43
This Debt/Worth or Leverage Ratio indicates the extent to which the business is reliant on debt financed money versus owner's equity): Debt equity ratio = total debt / total equity 2010 JK tyres Apollo 0.537 1.24 2009 0.459 1.91 2008 0.356 1.71
2.5 2
1.5
1 0.5 0 2010 2009 2008
JK tyres Apollo
Generally, the higher this ratio, the more risky a creditor will perceive its exposure in the business, making it correspondingly harder to obtain credit. By this ratio we can see that JKs debt equity ratio is increasing year to year and Apollos debt equity ratio is high so Apollo is more risky than JK. Owners fund as % of total source- owners fund in source shows that how much of this fund is involved in the total capital generated for company. It can be calculate as
44
44.63% 60.33%
We can see that Apollo have more share of its owner whether JK has comparatively low. Fixed asset turnover ratioA financial ratio of net sales to fixed assets. The fixed-asset turnover ratio measures a company's ability to generate net sales from fixed-asset investments - specifically property, plant and equipment (PP&E) - net of depreciation. A higher fixed-asset turnover ratio shows that the company has been more effective in using the investment in fixed assets to generate revenues. It can be calculated asNet sales/net property, plant and equipment 2010 JK tyres Apollo 1.44 2.10 2009 2.18 2.24 2008 1.16 2.38
45
This ratio is often used as a measure in manufacturing industries, where major purchases are made for PP&E to help increase output. When companies make these large purchases, prudent investors watch this ratio in following years to see how effective the investment in the fixed assets was.
46
COMPANY PROFILE
JK Tyre & Industries Ltd is one of the leading automotive tyre manufacturers in India. The company is engaged in manufacturing of automobile tyres, tubes and flaps. They manufactures Radial and Bias 4wheeler tyres for trucks, buses passenger cars, LCVs, tractors etc. They sell their products under the brand name 'JK Tyre'. They have four plants located in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka. The company has 134 sales, service and stock points located throughout the country. They have over 3,500 dealerships across India. The company's customer base covers virtually the entire Original Equipment Manufacturers in India together with Replacement Market for four wheeler vehicles, Defence and State Transport Units. Besides India, they have a worldwide customer base in over 45 countries across all six continents. JK Tyre & Industries Ltd was incorporated in the year 1951 as a private limited under the name JK Industries Pvt Ltd. Until March 31, 1970, the company was engaged in the managing agency business. Thereafter the company decided to undertake manufacturing activities and obtained a letter of intent in February 1972 for the manufacture of automobile tyres and tubes The company name was changed into JK Industries LTD with effect from May 24, 1974 consequent upon conversion of the company into a public limited company. In the year 1974, the company entered into a technical collaboration with General Tire International Co, USA, a subsidiary of General Tire & Rubber Co, USA for technical services and sales agreement for the supply of technical knowhow engineering and documentation for operational facilities. In the year 1989, the company introduced several new patterns and sizes of tyres including a semi-lug Nylon Truck tyre. In the year 1991, the company set up Banmore Tyre Plant with a capacity of 5.7 lakh tyres per annum. They launched radial tyres for tractors. In the year 1992, the company's international division expanded their activities by opening their office in Moscow. In addition, they set up a Research and Development center at HASETRI. 47
49
The above companies are shortlisted based on their global presence and their host continent. The Low Cost Countries that attracted investments from the above companies are 1. Asia a. China b. India c. Russia d. Indonesia e. Philippines f. Malaysia g. Thailand h. Turkey 2. Eastern Europe and Africa a. Slovakia b. Portugal c. Czech Republic d. Romania e. Hungary f. Poland g. South Africa 3. Latin America a. Brazil b. Mexico 50
The trend of Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) of the companies from 1999-2011 is as follows:
Capital Expenditure
3,000 2,500 2,000 Million $ 1,500 1,000 500 Good year Yokohama Michelin Bridgestone Continental
1,999 2,000 2,001 2,002 2,003 2,004 2,005 2,006 2,007 2,008 2,009 2,010 2,011
The total CAPEX of the companies during 1999-2011 is $ 55.9 billion. Michelin and Bridgestone are the companies with high Capital Expenditure of $19 billion and $21 billion and together constitute 71% of total CAPEX from all the companies. The Capital Investments for most of the companies started rising from the year 2002-03.This trend continued till 2008-09. During the year 2009 the Capital investments of all the companies fell due to Global recession and from the year 2010 there was a sharp increase in Capital investments as there was an expected demand rises for automobiles sector in the developing countries.
51
Romania, Mexico,Czech, Portugal, Malaysia Romania, Mexico, Hungary, Turkey Russia, China Portugal, Czech Asia Pacific Middle East Europe, Africa Latin America Thailand
2000
1500
1114
307 251
1284
604
740 264 316 745 41 159 601
528
China Brazil
420
415
1092
Mexico
512
Indonesia India
Bridgestone
Good Year
Of the total LCC CAPEX $12.2 billion, Michelin and Goodyear invested $4.8 billion and $2.9 billion that constitute to 38% and 24% of investments by all the companies in LCCs. Almost all the Companies have their majority investments in Asian LCCs as they have attracted 55% of total investments followed by Latin America with 25% and Middle East, Africa and Eastern Europe collectively with 20 % of total investments.
52
75%
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
The percentages of capital expenditures in LCCs have been steady during 200507 and increasing from 2010 onwards, this indicates the tyre companies are looking for LCCs to invest.
53
% CAPEX in LCC
Bridgestone
The above chart shows the companies percentage spending on LCCs. From the above chart we can observe that Yokohama and Goodyear invests majority of their CAPEX in LCCs. It can also be noticed that though the magnitude of CAPEX of Michelin and Bridgestone high, their percentage spending in LCCs is less. This shows that Michelin and Bridgestone are investing more in non LCCs.
54
The country wise Capital Investments of the companies are given in the following chart.
3,000
2,500
2,000 1,500 1,000 500
415 16 512
114 1,880 1283.61,114 1092.3 873 822 740 745 604 601 528.4 420 316 159 41
From the above chart it can be observed that Brazil, Russia, India, China attracted major proportion of Investments as it was estimated that the automobile sales in BRIC nations would be 15 million units by 2010 with a growth rate of 10% per year. Among these China has been the preferred destination due to its abundant resources, low labour and manufacturing costs, and abundant resources.
55
% of total Investments
(1-5)% 3% 5% 7% 6% India Mexico Brazil 10% (23-25)% China Slovakia Philippines Russia Thailand
Out of the total CAPEX of $12.278 billion the major countries like India, Mexico, China, Brazil, Slovakia, Philippines, Russia, and Thailand have got a $ 7.8 billion investment which is 63% of the total CAPEX in LCCs. China has the highest investments with 23% followed by Brazil, India and Mexico with 10% and 7% respectively.
56
Continent Wise CAPEX in LCCs The continents with LCCs are Asia, Latin America and East Europe with Africa. The continents are considered because there are joint investments in the countries that could not be segregated. The following chart gives the continent wise break up of investments.
8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0
From the above chart it can be observed that Asia has investments from all the companies and Continental and Michelin have invested in all the continents.
Million $
57
We can observe that Asian LCCs are mostly preferred for Tyre Sourcing with an investment of $6.8 billion (55%) out of a total $12.3 billion. Company wise share of CAPEX in LCCs
13% 7%
Michelin and Goodyear are expanding vigorously in LCCs compared to other companies. They together contribute 61% of total CAPEX in LCCs. 58
From the above chart we can conclude that majority of expansions took place in Commercial Tyre segment and most of the expansions took place in few countries like Thailand, China, and Brazil. The Passenger Car Tyre capacity is expanded in all the developing countries of Asia, East Europe and Latin America.
59
45%
46%
47%
From this it is observed that the companies are gradually increasing their capacity at LCCs. This is also contributed by the ceasing of plants at high cost European and American sites. Percentage of Sales in LCCs During the period 1999-2011 the percentage of units sold in LCCs are as follows
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 2000 2001 2002 47% 47% 49%
52%
53%
55%
56%
59%
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
This shows that the productions at LCC sites are mostly for the consumption in that LCC country.
60
Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Total Investment(Million $) 264 316 0 0 0 153 1160 727 991 57 0 671 5035
Till 2003 there were very less investments in LCCs. From 2005 the investments rushed to LCCs because of increasing competitiveness in the industry, increase of raw material, labour and mantainence costs in high cost countries. This was also attributed by the potential markets in growing countries like Brazil, China, Mexico, India and other African and East European countries. The year 2009 hit the global tyre industry as there was recession worldwide that led the companies to rationalize their activities at plants to reduce the costs.
61
There are many LCCs and the companies have ample choices for sourcing. The following chart gives the number of companies invested in those countries.
Company vs No of Countries
No of companies
5 4 3 2 1 0
From the above chart it is evident that China is the most attractive destination for sourcing of Tyres due to its abundant raw materials, cheap labour and less product cycle. China has attracted (23-25) % of total LCC investments during 199-2011. Trend in selecting the destinations
During the years 1999-2001 companies like Continental and Bridgestone invested in their host continents. From 2004-07 the companies expanded vigorously in Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin America. After 2008 all the companies invested only in Asian Countries.
62
Conclusion
The companies are able to cut the manufacturing costs over the period of time. The following chart represents the percentage of manufacturing costs to the sales turnover.
60%
55% 50% 45% 40% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Michilin
It can be observed that from the year 2009 most the companies have reduced their manufacturing costs. This was possible by Low Cost Country sourcing during the past years. Except Bridgestone all the companies registered had shown significant reduction in manufacturing costs. This is because Brigestone had invested more in High cost countries where as the remaining companies have invested in LCCs.
63
Observations:
1. Michelin and Bridgestone are the companies with highest Capital Expenditures but Michelin is investing more in LCCs whereas Bridgestone is investing more in non LCCs. 2. Capital Investments of all the companies have been increasing sharply from 2009. 3. China has emerged as the preferred destination for Tyre Sourcing followed by other countries like Mexico, Brazil, Russia, Thailand, India, Indonesia etc. 4. Commercial Tyre segment has attracted majority of investments in LCCs. 5. Most of the production in LCCs is used for the respective LCC. 6. The capacity at LCCs is gradually increasing year by year. 7. The companies started sourcing from East European, Latin American and Asian countries during 2004-2007 but from 2009 all the companies began to source from Asian LCCs. 8. The companies who have invested in LCCs showed reduction in their manufacturing costs over the period of time.
64
65
Source of Information
Secondary data is used mostly for the project. Most of the resources are obtained from internet. The following are the sources for the data collection. 1. 2. 3. 4. Company Annual Reports Company websites http://www.atmaindia.org http://www.ranker.com
66