Sie sind auf Seite 1von 18

Prop 32

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

What is the proposition meant to do?


It prohibits any corporation, labor union,
government contractor, or government employer from using payroll deducted funds for political purposes.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

What world will this proposition affect?


It would affect the political world because
the funds deducted would not go towards the support and campaigns of politicians.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Who will the proposition affect?


Prop 32 would affect the unions and
corporations, by taking less money from them; politicians and elected ofcials, by being able to accept the money for support; and the working people and students, by lowering the money used towards education and better working conditions and wages.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Who supports it? Who is funding the campaign?


The owners of the big companies and the
Republicans support the proposition.

Charles Munger, Jr. has donated

$22,949,561 and the American Future Fund has donated $4,080,000. They are Republican donors.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

What is the argument for the proposition?


The people for Proposition 32 believe that
there should be a cut between special interest and politicians. All money contributed should be done voluntarily.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Who is against it? Who is funding the NO vote?


The California Labor Federation, the
League of Women Voters of California, and many Democrats are against it. donated $20,214,056 while SEIU/California State Council of Service Employees has donated $11,470,256.

The California Teachers association has

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Supporters of Prop 32

Citizens for California Reform Democrats for Education Reform (DFER) Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association National Federation of Independent Business California John Arguelles, Retired CA Supreme Court Justice Marian Bergeson, Former CA Secretary of Education Senator Gloria Romero (Ret.), East Los Angeles George Shultz, Former U.S. Secretary of State

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

What is the nancial impact of the proposition?


It cuts the money given to politicians for
their campaigns. Prohibits unions from using the payroll-deducted funds for political purposes. $1 million annually would be used to implement and enforce the proposition requirements.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Symbol For Prop 32

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Who else is against it

More than two million teachers, reghters, police ofcers, nurses, school employees, and workers in the manufacturing, retail, construction, health care and other industries are against Prop 32.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Financial impact of the proposition?


The payroll-deductions go towards schools
and would improve health and safety provisions, and working wages. Instead the money would go towards the wealthy peoples businesses such as tobacco, pharmaceutical, and real estate giants.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Symbol Against Prop 32

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

PRO Arguments

Prop. 32 cuts the money ties between special interests and politicians to the full extent constitutionally allowed. It bans contributions from corporations and unions to politicians. It prohibits contributions from government contractors. It stops payroll withholding for politics, making all contributions voluntary. There are NO LOOPHOLES, NO EXCEPTIONS
http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/propositions/32/

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Cons Argument

Prop 32 exempts business Super PACs and thousands of big businesses from its provisions. It applies restrictions on working people and their unions. Its unfair, unbalanced, and wont take money out of politics. The money would still be voluntarily given to the politicians.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Financial Supporters

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Financial Supporters Against

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

If the proposition gets passed, money may


and will be donated to politicians.

Possible Unintended Consequences

Education would receive less money as well


as workers gaining benets, getting better working conditions, and earning better wages. businesses of the wealthy.

The money would instead go towards the


Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen