TAG:2012 SWS Surveys On Corruption

PRESENTATION OUTLINE
A. Survey Design B. Survey Results 1) PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION 2) SINCERITY IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION 3) GOVERNMENT EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION 4) PROSECUTION OF HIGH PROFILE CORRUPTION CASES 5) ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE 6) TRANSACTIONS WITH GOVERNMENT 7) PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION 8) BUSINESS EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION 9) HONEST BUSINESS PRACTICES 10) THE BUSINESS CLIMATE C. Summary of Findings
The TAG 2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption

Public Presentation of Results 24 October 2012, Cagayan De Oro 25 October 2012, Cebu City
TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION
THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2000 TO 2012
THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2000 TO 2012: SURVEY DATES AND SAMPLE SIZES
Fieldwork Dates Aug 14 Oct 26 2000 Sep 4 Dec 4 2001 Oct 25 Feb 25 2002/03 Nov 13 Jan 28 2003/04 Jan 21 Mar 15 2005 Feb 18 Apr 27 2006 Mar 4 May 11 2007 Sep 9 Oct 10 2008 Nov 3 Dec 5 2009 Jul 16 Oct 16 2012 Total TotalArea Sample NCR 604 NCR 505 NCR 500 NCR/Ceb/Dav 701 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 701 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 700 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 703 NCR/Ceb/Dav 402 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 550 7 areas (target 950) 972 372 100 100 100 100 100 100 Large 204 200 214 285 232 231 233 135 184 326 127 33 33 33 33 33 33 Small & Medium 400 305 286 416 469 469 470 267 366 646 245 67 67 67 67 67 67 Error Margin 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 3% 5% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
a. Are Time Series 10 rounds in National Capital Region (2000-09, 2012) 7 rounds in Metro Cebu (2004-09, 2012) 7 rounds in Metro Davao (2004-09, 2012) 5 rounds in Cavite-Laguna-Batangas and Cagayan de Oro-Iligan (2005-07; 2009, 2012) 1 round in Metro Angeles (2012) 1 round in Metro Iloilo (2012) b. Are Stratified by Size 2/3 weight: Small & Medium Enterprises 1/3 weight: Large Enterprises.
NCR: National Capital Region (target 350) Ang: Metro Angeles (new) CLB: Cavite-Laguna-Batangas Ilo: Metro Iloilo (new) Ceb: Metro Cebu Dav: Metro Davao CDO-I:Cagayan de Oro/Iligan City
THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2012: Integrity Initiative Signatories in the Sample
Total 2012 interviews Total Integrity Initiative (II) signatories Total non-II signatories
The SWS May 24-27, 2012 National Survey of Adults also has corruption items
Fieldwork Dates May 24-27 May 24-27 May 24-27 May 24-27 May 24-27 Sample Sizes 1,200 300 300 300 300 Error Margins 3% 6% 6% 6% 6%
PHILIPPINES : Metro Manila Balance Luzon Visayas Mindanao : : : :
7 Areas NCR METRO ANGELES CALABA METRO ILOILO METRO CEBU METRO DAVAO CDO-I
972 372 100 100 100 100 100 100
246 126 22 27 15 13 18 25
726 246 78 73 85 87 82 75
SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

TAG 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
ENTERPRISES: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, 2000 TO 2012

2 4 19 25 29 26 28 28 33 31 32 44 10 1 10 2 6 1 5 1 5 0.3 5 1 4 1 3 0.2 None 12
1) PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION
A little
Some
77 63 60 65 66 67 61 64 64 43
A lot
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
10
11
ENTERPRISES SAYING THERE IS A LOT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 70 64 51 43 27 39 33 63 57 47 46 40 2012
ENTERPRISES SAYING THERE IS A LOT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00*
77 71 7170 67 67 65 60 72 62 63 63 66 63 59 57 57 5858 71 66 60 55 64 61 56
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
66 56
63
59
51 39
47 46 33 27
45
40
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 14
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 15
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES VS. GEN. PUBLIC: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, 2012
Enterprises
A little None 0.2% 12% 43% A little 5% 11% 51%
ENTERPRISES: LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT WHERE CORRUPTION HAPPENS, 2009 and 2012

Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector 2009 81 65 78 67 2012
Gen. Public
None 93
72 54
48 33%
Some
44%
A lot
Some
A lot
National government City/municipal government Provincial government Barangay government
Q32. Among the different levels of government, where do you think corruption happens? Is it at the? (MULTIPLE RESPONSE ALLOWED)
19
21

ENTERPRISES: LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT WHERE CORRUPTION HAPPENS, BY AREA, 2012

Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector National
85 80 72 61 63 66 51 41 35 45 64 80 70 85
ENTERPRISES: LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WHERE CORRUPTION HAPPENS THE MOST, 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
City/Municipal
84 85 78 69
Provincial
81 79 74
Barangay Middle- level managers

83 74 64 58 80 81 73
70%
Supervisors
61%
Cabinet-level/top-level management officials
54%
Rank and file employees
49%
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 23
CEB
DAV
CDO-I 24
ENTERPRISES: LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WHERE CORRUPTION HAPPENS THE MOST, BY AREA, 2012
Middle-level managers Supervisor Cabinet-level Rank and file employees
ENTERPRISES: PERCEIVED NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS THAT GIVE BRIBES TO WIN PUBLIC SECTOR CONTRACTS, 2000 TO 2012
11 10 8 25 12 7 23 11 7 24 13 7 25 27 27 28 17 8 14 9 15 11 14 7 17 9
None Hardly any
71 67 55 46 43 65 56 44 47 62
68
71 66 57 58
75 69 59 59 50 45 62 61
75 58 59
8 24
29 30
Few
36
40
32
41
35
34
33 30
30
30
30 26
Most Almost all
23
15 '01*
22 '02*
23 '03**
21
17
18
15 '08**
18
15
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 25
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
'00*
'05*** '06*** '07***
'09*** '12****
28
ENTERPRISES SAYING MOST/ALMOST ALL COMPANIES IN MY LINE OF BUSINESS GIVE BRIBES TO WIN PUBLIC SECTOR CONTRACTS , BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
ENTERPRISES: MEDIAN PERCENTAGE OF CONTRACT ALLOTED AS BRIBE FOR PUBLIC SECTOR CONTRACT, 2005 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say Companies in Their Sector Allot a Percentage for Bribes to Win Public Sector Contracts 2005*** 15% 2006*** 20 2007*** 20 2008** 20 2009*** 20 2012**** 20
64 5757 5556 52 54 51 4747 42 44 40 56 48 46 45 58 52 5049 49
65 57
4950 46 42
47
45
38 35
4544
40 33
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 30
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
Q36. In instances when bribery happens, what percentage of an average contract is allotted for bribes to win public sector contracts?
32

ENTERPRISES: LAST TIME ONE HAD PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION IN OWN SECTOR OF BUSINESS, 2003/04 TO 2012
ENTERPRISES: THE LAST TIME OF PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF A CORRUPT TRANSACTION WITH GOVERNMENT IN ONES SECTOR OF BUSINESS, BY AREA, 2012
24
27 28
25
27
29
31 34
40
33 53 14
30
27
34
>1 yr ago
>1 yr ago
13
14 9
15 14 11 10
12 13 15 13
12 14 13 10 12 14 10 12 21 '12**** 12
15 11 12
6-12 mos. ago 4-6 mos. ago 2-3 mos. ago
14 11 11
9 11 14
6-12 mos. ago 4-6 mos. ago 2-3 mos. ago
10 14
13 10 9 9 9 9 5 10 13
16 16
31
25 '05***
25 '06***
29
29
23 '09***
25
Last month
20
20
22
22
21
Last month
03**
'07***
'08**
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 37
DAV
CDO-I
35
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER CORRUPTION IS WRONG BECAUSE IT IS IMMORAL OR BECAUSE IT HURTS THE COUNTRYS DEVELOPMENT, 2000 TO 2012
1 11 19 55 47 49 49 56 62 Corruption hurts the countrys development 3 1 1 Both [volunteered]
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER CORRUPTION IS WRONG BECAUSE IT IS IMMORAL OR BECAUSE IT HURTS THE COUNTRYS DEVELOPMENT, BY AREA, 2012
56
59 77
63
62
64
66
Corruption hurts the countrys development
41
32
45
41
50 37
Corruption is immoral
43
41 21
37
Corruption is immoral 36 35 34
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'12****
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 42
DAV
CDO-I
40
ENTERPRISES VS GENERAL PUBLIC: WHETHER SOURCES OF CORRUPTION ARE CITIZENS WHO BRIBE OR GOVT EMPLOYEES WHO ASK FOR BRIBES, 2012
Enterprises
The citizens who bribe 9% 28% 60% 67% 31% The govt employees who ask for bribes The govt employees who ask for bribes DK etc The citizens who bribe 5%
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER SOURCES OF CORRUPTION ARE CITIZENS WHO BRIBE OR GOVT EMPLOYEES WHO ASK FOR BRIBES, BY AREA, 2012
Gen. Public
DK etc 26 21 35 31 41 40 32 The citizens who bribe
64
68 56
62 52 48
61
The govt employees who ask for bribes
NCR 45
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 46
DAV
CDO-I

ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC: WHETHER A BUSINESSMAN OR A GOVT OFFICIAL IS TO BLAME WHEN CORRUPTION HAPPENS, 2012
1 3 3 3
The businessman only Mostly the businessman
0.3 3
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER A BUSINESSMAN OR A GOVT OFFICIAL IS TO BLAME WHEN CORRUPTION HAPPENS, BY AREA, 2012 The businessman
1 3 3 2 3 1 4 1 2 2 3
only Mostly the businessman
67
65 64
65 76
67
Both are equally to blame
64
74
67
Both are equally to blame
9 20 18 8
Mostly the official

24 23 12 7 7 8 21
20 9
14 9
19 9
Mostly the official The official only
The official only

7
Enterprises
Public 49
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 51
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER CAREER GOVERNMENT OFFICERS OR POLITICAL APPOINTEES ARE MORE SINCERE IN IMPLEMENTING ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICIES, BY AREA, 2012
Political appointees are more sincere
ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC: COMPARING THE DEGREE OF GRAFT AND CORRUPTION UNDER PNOY ADMIN VS PGMA ADMIN, 2012
Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector
24 30
20
24
17
Enterprises
More now Same as before 25% 2% Less now 73% Same as before 29%
Gen. Public
More now 5% Less now 64%
17
24
22
70
74 63
72
80
78
70
72
Career govt officers are more sincere
All Areas NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 53
DAV
CDO-I
Q37. If you compare the present administration with that of former President Arroyo, would you say that the degree of graft and corruption is ?
55
ENTERPRISES: COMPARING THE DEGREE OF GRAFT AND CORRUPTION UNDER PNOY ADMIN VS PGMA ADMIN, BY AREA, 2012
3 20 39 3 4 24 1 25 2 27 1 15 28
ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC: EXTENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF THE PNOY ADMINS ANTI-CORRUPTION EFFORTS, 2012
More now Same as before Almost no knowledge
Enterprises
None at all 1% 3% Extensive knowledge Almost no knowledge
Gen. Public
None at all 5% 14% Little knowledge 62% Extensive knowledge
15%
84 75 57 72 71 70 71
Less now
Little knowledge 59%
39%
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 57
DAV
CDO-I
Q38. How much do you know about the current efforts of the government to fight corruption?
59

ENTERPRISES: EXTENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF THE PNOY ADMINS ANTI-CORRUPTION EFFORTS, BY AREA, 2012
Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector 4 1 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 5 None at all Almost no knowledge Little knowledge
ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC: EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STEPS TAKEN BY PNOY ADMIN TO ERADICATE GRAFT AND CORRUPTION, 2012
Enterprises
Not at all effective Very effective Hardly effective 19% 66% Somewhat effective 3% 13%
Gen. Public
Not at all effective Very effective Hardly effective 6% 16% 25% 52% Somewhat effective
60 68
64
60
56
53
47
35 25
31
38
42
43
47
Extensive knowledge
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 61
DAV
CDO-I
Q39. In your opinion, how effective are the steps being taken by the present administration to eradicate corruption in our country? Are the steps being taken by government?
62
ENTERPRISES: EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STEPS TAKEN BY PNOY ADMIN TO ERADICATE GRAFT AND CORRUPTION, BY AREA, 2012
3 20 2 21 2 19 4 10 5 16 24 3 18
ENTERPRISES: OPINION ON HOW OFTEN THE GOVT PUNISHES CORRUPT GOVT OFFICIALS, BY AREA, 2012
12 5 17 8 7 15 11 8
Not at all Hardly effective
Almost never
61
67 64 67 65 68 59 63
66 63
57 69 56
52
55
Seldom
Somewhat effective
22
10 10 13 19 11 16 16
23 16 3 21 5 1
22 6
29
31
29
Often Almost all
Very effective
5
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 65
DAV
CDO-I
All Areas NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 67
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: EXCELLENT SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+80
2) SINCERITY IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION
+70 +50 +30 +10

+10
Office of the President
-10
-15
-3
-30
-27 -37
68
73

ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 +83 +70 +81 2012 +70 +80 +81 +87 +76 +78 +50
ENTERPRISES: VERY GOOD SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+61
+54 +42 +37 +32 +30 +26 +38
+60 +51
+40
+30
+11
+10 -16 -37 -45 -21
+10 +3
+7 0
Dept. of Health NCR ANG

-53 -49 -10
Dept. of Trade and Industry
Dept. of Education
All areas
CLB
ILO 74
CEB
DAV
CDO-I 75
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DOH, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 +77 2012
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE DTI, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 2012
+65 +61 +65 +60 +52 +37 +38 +37 +41 +33 +57 +59 +52 +55 +45 +38 +30 +28 +39 +59 +57 +56 +58 +60 +56 +57
+64
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 76
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 77
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DEPED, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 +62 +51 +60 +50 +32 +10 +47 +40 +40 +30 +22 2012 +50
ENTERPRISES: GOOD SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+39
+36 Senate
Dept. of Interior & Local Government +30
+5 9 0 -1 -30 0 9 -10
+9 +4 -1 -8 -7 -6 -13 -17 -17 -18 -23 -25 -32

Office of the Ombudsman
-21
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 78
CEB
DAV
CDO-I 79

ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 +45 +39 +27 +29 +32 +22 +21 2012 +46 +35 +36
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE SENATE, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 2012 +53 +44 +46 +41 +29 +14 0 +30
+42
+28
-8 -15 -15
-1 -8
-3
-4
All areas
-33
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 80
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 81
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DILG, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 +36 +30 +23 +16 2012
ENTERPRISES: MODERATE SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012 (1/2)

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+50 +31 +25 +36 +28 +30

+19
+48 +40
+45 +37 +40
Dept. of Budget & Management
+27
+13 +14 +5 +8
+24
+24
+23
+10 -10 -25 -38 -47 -10 -10 -6
+5 0
Sandiganbayan
Supreme Court
-7 -17
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 82
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
-30
83
ENTERPRISES: MODERATE SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012 (2/2)

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE SANDIGANBAYAN, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 2012 +35 +27 +23 +29 +28 +20 +17 +8 +8 +0 +21
+50
+35 +35
+30
+27 +22
+26
Dept. of Trans & Comm. +21 +10
+33
+32
+10
-10
Your City/ Municipal govt

-22
-13
-30
-27
-2
-30
All areas 84
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 85
CEB
DAV
CDO-I

ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE SUPREME COURT, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DBM, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 +33 2012 +33 +20 +17
+46 +40 +29 +24 +25 +16 +17 +23 +17 -17 -16 +42 +31 +42 +31 +39 +23
+16 +10 +6
-10
-7 -17
-41
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 86
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 87
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF YOUR CITY GOVERNMENT, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012 +65 +66 +55 +51 +10 +35 +21 +22 +19 +31 +33 +34 +21
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DOTC, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 2012
+15 0
+17 +12 +7 +1 +7
-9 -25 -24
0 -13
-30 -38 -47
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 88
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 89
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: NEUTRAL SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DENR, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 +18 2012
+10
Dept. of Envt & Nat. Resources

+1
House of Representatives
+16 +10 +7
-10
-6
+1 -4
-23 -25
-17
-28
-15 -27
-30
-34 -39 -44
-24
-32 -34
-23
-34 -42 -45
-40
-41
-50
All areas 90
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 91
CEB
DAV
CDO-I

ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ENTERPRISES: POOR SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012 (1/2)

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+14 +6 0 -6 -12 -22 -34 -50 -36 -36 -25 -5 +3
+16 -10
Philippine National Police
Commission on Elections
Bureau of Internal Revenue
-8
-12
-30
-18-17 -23 -27 -36
-13
-20
-50
-36 -42 -59
-49 -59-58 -56-57
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 92
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
-70
93
ENTERPRISES: POOR SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012 (1/2)

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE PNP, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 2012
Dept. of Public Works & Highways

-10
Land Transportation Office
+18 +5 +1 -5 -16 -23 -28 -31
+3 -30
-21
-31-32 -38 -39 -45 -55
-26
-12 -17 -19
-4
-5
-50
-70
-66-66
-63 -65 TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION
All areas 94
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 95
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE COMELEC, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 2012
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF BIR, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 0 2012
-1 -4 -8
-2 -2 -20 -27 -11 -11
-12 -19
-13 -24 -30 -46 -43
-13
-12
-16 -18 -24
-16
-57 -66 -24
-60 -67
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 96
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 97
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
10

ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DPWH, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 2012
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF LTO, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 2012
-8 -21 -30 -20 -32 -36 -39 -56 -65 -71 -71 -70 -52 -55 -40 -24 -30
-7 -15 -26 -30 -35 -37 -48 -29 -24 -26 -29
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 98
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 99
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: BAD SINCERITY RATING IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE BOC, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012

2009 2012
Bureau of Customs
0 -10 -30 -46 -64 -75 -70
-75 -74 -68 -72 -69
-30 -46 -50 -42 -55 -69 -76
-33 -39
-47
-42
-46
-72
All areas
TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION 100
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: THE GOVERNMENT CAN BE RUN WITHOUT CORRUPTION OR CORRUPTION IS PART OF THE WAY THE GOVT WORKS, 2000 TO 2012
3) GOVERNMENT EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION
43
42
44
40
40
43
50
56
50
41
Corruption is part of the way govt works
55
57
56
60
60
56
49
44
50
59
The govt can be run without corruption
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
113
11

ENTERPRISES: THE GOVERNMENT CAN BE RUN WITHOUT CORRUPTION OR CORRUPTION IS PART OF THE WAY THE GOVT WORKS, BY AREA, 2012
ENTERPRISES VS GENERAL PUBLIC: THE GOVERNMENT CAN BE RUN WITHOUT CORRUPTION OR CORRUPTION IS PART OF THE WAY THE GOVT WORKS, 2012
Enterprises
Gen. Public
39 48
32
36 52
44
40
33% 41%
68 52
61
64 47
56
59
59%
65%
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 116
DAV
CDO-I
117
ENTERPRISES ON IT IS NOW EASIER FOR ANYONE WHO WANTS TO BID ON A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT TO GET INFORMATION ABOUT THE BIDDING, 2007 TO 2012
26 26 16 22 19 Disagree Undecided
ENTERPRISES: WHERE WOULD YOUR COMPANY GET INFORMATION ABOUT BIDDING FOR GOVT CONTRACTS, 2012
Newspapers 48 41 27 20 20 12
23
Internet Inside information/tip
21
16
Agree 54 57 53 60
Television Word of mouth from family/friends
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
Radio
*NET Agreement: % Agree minus % Disagree.
122
127
ENTERPRISES: WHERE WOULD YOUR COMPANY GET INFORMATION ABOUT BIDDING FOR GOVT CONTRACTS, BY AREA, 2012
Newspaper Internet Inside info. Television Word of mouth
64
Radio
52 48 45 41 37 3635 34 38 34 29 23 16 9 6 18 15 15 9 24 23 45
51 48 44 37 34 39 36
4) PROSECUTION OF HIGH-PROFILE CORRUPTION CASES

26
21
23 19 12 13
2221 14
19 17 14
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 128
CEB
DAV
CDO-I 129
12

ENTERPRISES: OPINION ON THE CURRENT PACE OF THE TRIAL OF SELECTED CORRUPTION CASES IN GOVT, 2012
Might not Carefully succeed, done moving at TOO QUICKLY RIGHT PACE MUCH TOO SLOW
ENTERPRISES: THE ON-GOING TRIALS OF SOME CORRUPTION CASES ARE CONDUCTED FAIRLY OR UNFAIRLY, 2012
FAIR NEITHER FAIR NOR UNFAIR UNFAIR
Graft vs PGMA: NBN-ZTE Graft vs Ben Abalos: NBN-ZTE Graft vs Mike Arroyo: allegedly anomalous PNP helicopter sale Malversation of funds vs ex-PAGCOR Chair Genuino: Donated rice Perjury and Falsification of Public Docs vs V. Garcillano: Hello Garci Plunder vs Maj. Gen. Garcia
17
29
56
Plunder vs Maj. Gen. Garcia Graft vs Mike Arroyo: allegedly anomalous PNP helicopter sale Perjury and Falsification of Public Docs vs V. Garcillano: Hello Garci Graft vs Ben Abalos: NBN-ZTE Malversation of funds vs ex-PAGCOR Chair Genuino: Donated rice
76 71 71
18 22 23
5 6 6
15
29
56
12
21
66
25
6654
67 68 67
25 25 24
7 5 10
8 6
11 22
81 71
Graft vs PGMA: NBN-ZTE
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR BRIBE, 2012

80
Any of seven listed bribes Getting local govt permits/licenses Assessment/payment of income taxes Getting national govt permits/ licenses Complying with import regulations incl. payment of import duties Supplying govt with goods/ services Collecting receivables from govt Availing of govt incentives
5) ENTEPRISES SOLICITED FOR BRIBE

27 19 17 14 13 5
31
140
141
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR ANY OF SEVEN LISTED BRIBES, 2005 TO 2012
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: GETTING LOCAL GOVT PERMITS/LICENSES, 2000 TO 2012
55 54 50 49 41 50 36 33 40 32 31
68 61 57 61
71 60
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
13

ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: ASSESSMENT/PAYMENT OF INCOME TAXES, 2000 TO 2012

52 50 46 43 39 33 30 29 27 40
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: GETTING NATIONAL GOVT PERMITS/ LICENSES, 2000 TO 2012
47 42 37 34 28 28 29 37 32
19
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05*** '06*** '07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: COMPLYING WITH IMPORT REGULATIONS INCL. PAYMENT OF IMPORT DUTIES, 2000 TO 2012
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: SUPPLYING GOVT WITH GOODS/ SERVICES, 2000 TO 2012
31 21 13 10 22 25 27 22 17 15 18 14 15 16 18
29 22 14
17
18
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09*** '12****
146
147
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: COLLECTING RECEIVABLES FROM GOVT, 2000 TO 2012
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: AVAILING OF GOVT INCENTIVES, 2000 TO 2012
24 18 13 9 8 11 20 16 20 13 10 6 '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12**** '00* 4 '01* '02* 5 '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** 10 11 13
22 14 5 '08** '09*** '12****
'00*
'01*
14

ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR ANY OF SEVEN LISTED BRIBES, BY AREA, 2012
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: GETTING LOCAL GOVT PERMITS/LICENSES, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01*
60
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
58 47 36 31
56 47 50
5554 50 48 4645 42 3937 3233 46 42 37 39 37 29 29 24 26 23
32
33
28 22
24 20 12
23
19
26 24 25 21 19
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: ASSESSMENT/ PAYMENT OF INCOME TAXES, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: GETTING NATIONAL GOVT PERMITS/ LICENSES, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
59 55 52 50 4342 36 3334 38 50 43 37 323232 29 2324 37 42 37 35 34 36 3233 43 39 33 30 30 27 27 22 39 42 40
41 36
33 28
24 25 1920 22 24
28
30
23
22
23
21 20
25 2322
25
25 2221
18
19
20
20
13
14
11
14
9
16
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: COMPLYING WITH IMPORT REGULATIONS INCL. PAYMENT OF IMPORT DUTIES, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12**** '00* '01*
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: SUPPLYING GOVT WITH GOODS/ SERVICES, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
4140
31 28 25 18 14 10
30
32 2425 21 18 1817 13
20 18
17 1213 19 16
242325
27
28
22 19 16 18 1414 17 18 1514 13 15 18
30
2928 24
28
27
21 18
18 17 13
23 1918
17
18
12 9
2
10
12 7
13
15 6
3 8
11 5
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 163
DAV
CDO-I
15

ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: COLLECTING RECEIVABLES FROM GOVT, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12**** '00* '01*
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: AVAILING OF GOVT INCENTIVES, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
27 22 18 19 15 10 16 16 2122 19
26
30 28 23 20 20 1314 15
27 25
22
17 10 6 4 4 11 13 14 13 9 9 9 6 3 14
16
21 18
13 9 8
14
10
7
11
15 12 13
17
19 1415 11 10
11
13
11
8
2
5 2 2
9 9
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: REPORTING OF BRIBE-SOLICITATION, 2005 TO 2012

Base: Those Who Were Solicited for a Bribe
ENTERPRISES: REPORTING OF BRIBE-SOLICITATION, BY AREA, 2012

Base: Those Who Were Solicited for a Bribe
92
93
89
86
91
91
Did not report bribe-solicitation
92
86
84 94 95
89
94
Did not report bribesolicitation
Reported bribesolicitation 8 '05*** 7 '06*** 11 '07*** 14 '08** 9 '09*** 9 '12**** Reported bribe-solicitation
8 14 16 6 5 11 6
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 170
DAV
CDO-I
169
ENTERPRISES: REASONS FOR NOT REPORTING BRIBE-SOLICITATION, 2012

Base: Those Who Were Solicited for a Bribe But Did Not Report It, 91% Nothing would be done anyway Cannot prove anything Afraid of reprisal Too small a thing to bother Do not know how/whom to report Its a standard practice not to report Will spend much Dont want to betray anyone It is embarrassing 6
ENTERPRISES: REASONS FOR NOT REPORTING BRIBE-SOLICITATION, 2005 TO 2012

Base: Those Who Were Solicited for a Bribe But Did Not Report It 05 06 07 08 09 Nothing would be done anyway Cannot prove anything Afraid of reprisal It is too small a thing to bother Do not know how or whom to report It is standard practice anyway not to report the incident Will spend much Do not want to betray anyone It is embarrassing 60% 46 43 38 28 43 32 17 12 69% 50 54 44 34 52 44 29 19 69% 45 49 47 35 48 45 27 18 79% 61 55 52 40 57 59 29 24 75% 50 51 48 44 46 50 32 23 12 45% 39 34 26 25 21 20 13 6
45 39 34 26 25 21 20 13
Q73. IF DID NOT REPORT: Why did you not report this? (ENCIRCLE ALL THAT APPLY)
174
16

ENTERPRISES: PART OF THE COMPANY THAT IS MOST VULNERABLE TO BRIBERY, 2012

Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Rank 1 (Most vulnerable) Rank 6 (Least vulnerable) 64
ENTERPRISES: PART OF THE COMPANY THAT IS MOST VULNERABLE (% RANK 1) TO BRIBERY, BY AREA, 2012
Procurement Sales & marketing Top mngt. Finance Logistics HR mngt
Procurement Sales & marketing Top management Finance Logistics 5 8 12 10 25 11 19 6 18
50 24 8 8 18 19 28 11
15 21 30
10 12
7 7
5 3
5
54 42 32 30 29 20 13 1 3 3 5 2 32 26 18 18 15 9 4 2 21 14 7 22 20 13 34 53
20 16 22 9
12 7
3
16 20 17 17 10
Human resource mgt 1 4
852
0.3
Q44. In your sector of business, which part of a company is most vulnerable to bribery? Please rank your answers from the MOST VULNERABLE (1).
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 184
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
182
ENTERPRISES: SECTORS THAT ARE MOST VULNERABLE TO CORRUPTION, 2012

Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector 60 53 42 27 25 21 17 13 9 9 8 3 Forestry Transportation/communications/storage Trade Finance Ownership of dwellings & real estate Electricity, gas, & water Manufacturing Agriculture and fishery Construction Mining & quarrying Government services
6) TRANSACTIONS WITH GOVERNMENT
Other private services
186
188
ENTERPRISES: TRANSPARENCY OF TRANSACTION PROCEDURES OF THE CITY/MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OFFICES, 2009 AND 2012
5 22 2 23
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER THE PROCESS OF BUSINESS PERMITS/LICENSES RENEWALS IS EASIER OR HARDER NOW THAN 3 YEARS AGO, 2009 AND 2012
4 11 3 9
Definitely Not Transparent Somewhat Not Transparent
Much harder Somewhat harder now Not changed
28
32
58
58
Somewhat Transparent
38
Somewhat easier now

37
16
15
Definitely Transparent
19 '09***
18 '12****
Much easier now
'09***
'12****
194
17

ENTERPRISES: THE COMPANYS EXPERIENCE IN USING AN INTERMEDIARY IN ITS RENEWAL OF BUSINESS PERMITS/LICENCES, 2009 AND 2012
6 1 25 6 2 20 8
ENTERPRISES: WILLINGNESS TO PAY TWICE AS MUCH TO DOUBLE THE VALIDITY PERIODS OF GOVT ISSUED LICENSES/PERMITS, 2012
Not willing at all 21% Very much willing 40% 16% Not much willing
Always used Uses only now Uses from time to time Used before not now
10
58
64
Never used
23%
Somewhat willing
'09*** '12****
Q62. How willing are you to pay twice as much to double the validity periods of government issued licenses/permits?
198
202
ENTERPRISES: WILLINGNESS TO PAY TWICE AS MUCH TO DOUBLE THE VALIDITY PERIODS OF GOVT ISSUED LICENSES/PERMITS, BY AREA, 2012
18 13 20 29 18 26 27 28 49 21 23 24 44 52 34 34 Very willing 22 35 15 15 15 12 17 20 14 21 22 29
ENTERPRISES: INTERNET-BASED GOVERNMENT TRANSACTIONS THE COMPANY HAS DONE, 2012

SSS: Online payment 56
Not willing at all Not much willing Somewhat willing
BIR: eFPS (Electronic Filing & Payment System) BIR: Online Registration System PHILHEALTH online services PhilGEPS: Get info on bidding opportunities BOC: E2M (electronic to mobile) Customs Automated Process 31 48
55
53
26
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 204
DAV
CDO-I
205
ENTERPRISES: HAVE YOU EVER SUBMITTED A BID FOR A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT? BY AREA, 2012
7) PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION

68 61 84 83 69 63 63 70 Have not submitted bid
32
38 16 17
31
36
36
30
Submitted bid
All Areas NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I 211
18

ENTERPRISES: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, 2000 TO 2012

4 3 3 8 5 5 5 5 7 7 None
ENTERPRISES SAYING THERE IS A LOT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
43
44
41 49 48 53 53 52 48 45
A little
14 13
14
12
11 10 9 8 9 8 7
1313 12
13
12
12 10
12
11
10
8 8 7 7 5 4 4
99
39
44
43 34 37 34 34 35 36 37
7 7
Some
1
14 '00*
9 '01*
13 '02*
10 9 9 9 8 8 '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09***
11 '12****
A lot NCR ANG CLB ILO 216 CEB DAV
CDO-I
213
ENTERPRISES VS. GEN. PUBLIC: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, 2012
Enterprises
None 7% 11% 37%
ENTERPRISES: NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN THE SAME LINE OF BUSINESS THAT GIVE BRIBES TO WIN PRIVATE SECTOR CONTRACTS, 2000 TO 2012
8 20 7 17 7 16 10 18 11 16 14 20 12 20 13 19 12 16 10 19
Gen. Public
None A little 16% 7% 38%
A lot
None Hardly any
45% A little
A lot
47
48
46
Some
46
46 45 46 45
47
43
Few
37%
Some
18 6 '00* TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION 219 23 5 '01* 25 5 '02* 20 6 '03** 21 6 '05*** 16 6 '06*** 17 5 '07*** 17 5 '08** 19 4 '09*** 22 555 '12****
Most Almost all
ENTERPRISES SAYING MOST/ALMOST ALL COMPANIES IN MY LINE OF BUSINESS GIVE BRIBES TO WIN PRIVATE SECTOR CONTRACTS, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
ENTERPRISES: MEDIAN PERCENTAGE OF CONTRACTS ALLOTED AS A BRIBE FOR A PRIVATE BUSINESS CONTRACT, 2000 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say Companies in Their Sector Allot Percentage of Contract for Bribes to Win Private Sector Corruption 2000* 10% 2001* 15 2002/03* 10 2003/04** 10 2005*** 10 2006*** 10 2007*** 10 2008** 10 2009*** 10 2012**** 10
38
33 30 28 26 24 23 18 18
39
38
35 31
29 24 22 22 22 30 29 27 25 21 18 29 27
28
29
26 23 18 22 20
22
21
22
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO 223
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
Q43. In instances when bribery happens, what percentage of an average contract is allotted for bribes to win private business contracts?
225
19

ENTERPRISES ON: A PERSON LIKE ME CANNOT DO ANYTHING TO REDUCE CORRUPTION IN THE GOVERNMENT, 2007 TO 2012
8) BUSINESS EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION
67
61
61
67
Disagree
4 29 '07***
6 27 '12****
Undecided Agree
33
33
'08**
'09***
NET Disagreement computed as % Disagree minus % Agree.
227
229
ENTERPRISES ON: A PERSON LIKE ME CANNOT DO ANYTHING TO REDUCE CORRUPTION IN THE GOVERNMENT, BY AREA, 2012
13 1
60 76 69 71 58 51 62
ENTERPRISES: EXPECTED CHANGE IN NET INCOME, IF CORRUPTION IS REDUCED TO THAT OF SINGAPORE, 2001 TO 2012
7 2 31 8 3 29 11 5 27 8 5 30 7 4 5 3 7 5 Not aware 10 4 Negative change No change
Disagree
32
37
41
37
33
4 14 6 3 20 26 25 26 32 31 3 45 10 7
Undecided 53 Agree 60 60 57 56 52 50 51 52 Positive change
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
NET Disagreement computed as % Disagree minus % Agree.
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
ENTERPRISES: CONTRIBUTION TO PAY TO FUND A PROGRAM THAT WOULD HALVE PUBLIC-SECTOR CORRUPTION IN 10 YEARS, 2000-2012
% willing to contribute 2000* 2001* 2002/03* 2003/04** 2005*** 2006*** 2007*** 2008** 2009*** 2012**** 61 70 74 71 77 72 65 72 71 67 Among willing to contribute: median % of net income willing to contribute 3% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
ENTERPRISES: SPENDING IN THE LAST 2 YEARS TO COMBAT FRAUD AND CORRUPTION IN OWN COMPANY, 2007 TO 2012
6 3 4 6 10 9 5 3 6 5 9 11 5 3 3 6 11 12 7 2 4 4 12 12 1 million ++ 500,000 - 999,000 200,000 - 499,000 100,000 - 199,000 10,000 - 99,000 < 10,000 Nothing 61 61 59 57
2007***
2008**
2009***
2012****
239
243
20

ENTERPRISES: THE COMPANYS CONTRIBUTION TO ANY PRIVATE ANTI-CORRUPTION PROGRAM IN THE LAST 2 YEARS, 2007 TO 2012 1 million ++
1 0.3 1 2 5 7 2 2 1 2 4 10 2 0.4 1 2 5 6
ENTERPRISES: WAYS FOR BUSINESSES TO REDUCE CORRUPTION, 2008 TO 2012

84 82 81 65 62 61 2008 2009 2012
11 1
2 5 10
500,000 - 999,000 200,000 - 499,000 100,000 - 199,000 < 10,000
79
78 76
80
78
81
76
Nothing
22
26 19 15 15 17 15
22 17 11 10 13
2007***
2008**
2009***
2012**** TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION
Use honest business practices
Never pay bribes
Know the laws/rules of govt transact.
Join an anticorrupti on CSO
Report corruption to mass media
Campaign Report govt vs corrupt corruption to the political candidates Ombudsman
249
253
ENTERPRISES: EFFECTIVENESS OF SOME SUGGESTIONS TO REDUCE CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENT, 2012

Impose stiffer penalties: corrupt govt people Show prominent corrupt persons are put in prison More transparent govt bidding Impose stiffer penalties: people who bribe Broadcast/publish where to report corruption Monitor closely election expenses of candidates Require fewer signatures on papers Substantially increase govt salaries Privatize govt corporations Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective at all
ENTERPRISES: FREQUENCY OF PUNISHING CORRUPT EXECUTIVES IN OWN SECTOR OF BUSINESS, 2003/04 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector 9 13 14 11 23 12 11 13 30 37 28 29 27 29 27 21 22 20 Almost always Often Seldom Almost never
83 82 77 73 67 54 52 38 27 49 48 32 39
16
14 3 21 23 27 3 4 5 14 9 14 24
20
22
20
29 '03**
31
34
27 '07***
30
25 '09***
33
'05***
'06***
'08**
'12****
ENTERPRISES: WILLINGNESS TO CONTRIBUTE TO AN EMPOWERMENT FUND, BY AREA, 2012

7 areas 27% 48 19 NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB 28% 13% 29% 28% 27% 48 16 69 15 47 17 49 19 44 22 DAV CDO-I 38% 23% 29 25 46 21
Willing to contribute Not willing to contribute Dont know etc.
9) HONEST BUSINESS PRACTICES
Q127. The government is setting up an Empowerment Fund to support civil society organizations (CSOs) in organizing citizens and communities to engage with government in the implementation and monitoring of government, participate in planning and the budget process of government. It is expected that Empowerment Fund initiative will help in reducing corruption and enhancing transparency of government transactions. The government plans to tap private sectors, donor agencies, and even CSOs to contribute and provide counterpart funds to the Empowerment Program. How much is your company willing to contribute to the Empowerment Fund?
267
279
21

ENTERPRISES: NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN THE LINE OF BUSINESS THAT DEMAND/ISSUE DEMAND RECEIPTS, KEEP ONE SET OF ACCOUNTS, AND PAY TAXES HONESTLY, 2012
0.1 1 10 0.3 1 21 32 44 47 42 45 31 20 Demand receipts for all payments for expenses Issue receipts for all revenues Pay taxes honestly 21 41 29 1 5 2 6
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS PAY TAXES HONESTLY, 2003/04 TO 2012
None Hardly any Few
Most
39 38 40 38 40 42
42
Most
Almost all
16 19 '05*** 18 '06*** 18 '07*** 18 '08** 17 '09*** 20 '12**** '03**
Almost all
Keep only one set of accounts/ books
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS PAY TAXES HONESTLY, BY AREA, 2012
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS ISSUE RECEIPTS FOR ALL REVENUES, 2003/04 TO 2012
43 44
44
41
41
39 35
48 47
44
45
44 45
47
Most
Most
16
23
23
20
23
27 16
38
Almost all
'03**
34
36
34
37
31
31
Almost all
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 283
DAV
CDO-I
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
290
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS ISSUE RECEIPTS FOR ALL REVENUES, BY AREA, 2012
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS KEEP ONLY ONE SET OF ACCOUNTS, 2003/04 TO 2012
49 37 39 54 55
42 40
Most
43 45 39 39 43 40 401
Most
31
33
33
38 24 25
30
Almost all
23 24 '05***
24
22 '07***
20 '08**
19 '09***
21 '12****
Almost all
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
'03**
'06***
22

ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS KEEP ONLY ONE SET OF ACCOUNTS, BY AREA, 2012
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS DEMAND RECEIPTS FOR ALL PAYMENTS, 2005 TO 2012
43
38
37
36 42
44
Most
45 39 36 43
43
40
25 23 20 26 24 14
Most
50
50
49
53
45
45
Almost all
15
18
Almost all
'05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS DEMAND RECEIPTS FOR ALL PAYMENTS, BY AREA, 2012
10) THE BUSINESS CLIMATE

44 52 39 43 51 35 45
Most
51 37
44
42
42
50 38
Almost all
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB 305
DAV
CDO-I 310
ENTERPRISES: SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT IN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS CLIMATE, 2007 TO 2012
12 27 47 20 19 18 69 53 35 43 38 18
ENTERPRISES: PERCENT SATISFIED WITH THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT IN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS CLIMATE, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009
78 69 58 53 44 73
Dissatisfied Undecided
2012
74 69 54 47 68
Satisfied
30
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
23

ENTERPRISES: SATISFACTION WITH YOUR CITY GOVERNMENT IN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS CLIMATE, 2007 TO 2012
Dissatisfied Undecided
ENTERPRISES: PERCENT SATISFIED WITH THE CITY GOVERNMENT IN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS CLIMATE, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
87 69 61 52 44 73 77 76 76
19
20
21
19
16
15
16
17
67 54 55
64
64
63
64
Satisfied
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES: BUSINESS EXPECTATIONS IN THE NEXT 2 YEARS, 2000 TO 2012

13 3 21 34 44 36 40 30 16 1 '00* 1 '01* 26 3 '02* 25 3 6 5 9 6 9 16 Excellent '12**** 41 6 6 23 21 40 42 40 52 33 46 40 43 58
Good
3 11
3 10
2 5
3 13
1 5
0.1 3 24
Very Poor Poor Fair
ENTERPRISES: PERCENT EXCELLENT/GOOD BUSINESS EXPECTATIONS IN THE NEXT 2 YEARS, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
81 67 68 49 72 66 65 53 51 76
32
37
80 72
'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09***
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
322
323
www.sws.org.ph www.sws.org.ph
THE SWS MISSION IS TO GENERATE DATA to help eyes to see Education to cause hearts to feel Conscientization to help minds to understand Analysis
#52 Malingap Street, E-mail: Sikatuna Village, Quezon City Tels: 926-4308, 924-4456, 924-4458, 924-4465
sws_info@sws.org.ph
332
333
24

www.sws.org.ph
Quot homines tot sententiae
As Many Opinions As There are People
334
25


TAG:2012 SWS Surveys On Corruption

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

TAG:2012 SWS Surveys On Corruption

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

The TAG 2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2000 TO 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

PHILIPPINES : Metro Manila Balance Luzon Visayas Mindanao : : : :

972 372 100 100 100 100 100 100

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

ENTERPRISES: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, 2000 TO 2012

1) PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION

'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

ENTERPRISES: LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT WHERE CORRUPTION HAPPENS, 2009 and 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

ENTERPRISES: LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT WHERE CORRUPTION HAPPENS, BY AREA, 2012

Barangay Middle- level managers

Cabinet-level/top-level management officials

Rank and file employees

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

None Hardly any

Most Almost all

'05*** '06*** '07***

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

64 5757 5556 52 54 51 4747 42 44 40 56 48 46 45 58 52 5049 49

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

6-12 mos. ago 4-6 mos. ago 2-3 mos. ago

6-12 mos. ago 4-6 mos. ago 2-3 mos. ago

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Corruption hurts the countrys development

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

The govt employees who ask for bribes

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

The businessman only Mostly the businessman

only Mostly the businessman

Both are equally to blame

Both are equally to blame

Mostly the official

Mostly the official The official only

The official only

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Career govt officers are more sincere

All Areas NCR

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

More now Same as before Almost no knowledge

Little knowledge 59%

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

'03 '05* '06* '07* '08 '09* '12****

'05* '06* '07***