UP TO DATE NO.

41 MARCH 2012

PUBLICATION OF AAWA-ASSOCIATION

http://www.iranian.com/main/blog/massoud-khodabandeh/secretary-clinton-trapped-falsedichotomy

Secretary Clinton trapped by a false dichotomy

... the world is genuinely working toward a peaceful end to the camp and the release and resettlement of the hostages, it appears Secretary of State Clinton is somewhat ambiguous in her dealing with the situation. Based on a legal ruling, Clinton must make a decision by the end of March whether the State Department remove the MEK from its terrorism list or not. Presenting this as leverage she has introduced a unilateral condition to the MEKs removal from Iraq; if the MEK cooperate with UNAMI and the Government of Iraq, she has indicated, we will remove them from the US terrorism list. But cooperation with UNAMI is a legal obligation rather than an optional choice for the MEK ...
massoud khodabandeh , Iranian.com, March 20 2012 In November 2011 a large group of interested people met in Baghdad to discuss the seemingly intractable problem of how to dismantle the Mohjahedin-e Khalq foreign terrorist group and remove the members from the country. At the behest of families of the individuals trapped inside Camp Ashraf, the GOI agreed to proceed in a way that would avoid violent confrontation. Iraqs Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari announced later, We will refuse them the satisfaction of becoming martyrs on our soil. The Governor of Diyala, the military head of Diyala province and other authorities all went the extra mile to prevent the MEK from killing more hostages and blaming the Iraqis for it.

Massoud Khodabandeh

Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the UN which would allow more time and give oversight of the eviction process to the UN and to representatives of the EU and US. The Iraqis have kept their side of bargain the deadline for the MEKs departure was extended and negotiations were facilitated to persuade the MEK to cooperate in a move from Camp Ashraf to Camp Liberty where the UNHCR would be able to assess each individual for refugee status. (Remember that no external body, including the GOI, has been able to freely access the inside of Camp Ashraf since the fall of Saddam Hussein.) The first 800 individuals have now moved and another 800 are lined up to move over the next few days in two groups of 400. The MEK leader has not been able to exploit the situation and kill any hostages. The GOI has control of the situation. UNAMI has been rigorous in its supervision of the move and, by enforcing its own rules and regulations has not allowed propaganda to overshadow activities at either camp. Facilities at the new camp were approved by UN inspectors, the ICRC has been involved and behind the scene EU and US special advisors have been keeping a watchful eye on events. The MEK has character assassinated UNAMI and its officials, and others, in the media but UNAMI has not been diverted by the efforts of the MEK and their backers. But one pernicious factor which has actively impeded proper progress in this task has been the support given to the MEK by Israelis and US Neoconservatives whose clear intent is to politicise what is essentially a humanitarian situation. The MEK is a well-honed tool in the hands of these ideologues and is used to incite hatred against Iran and Iraq among ignorant and lazy political communities. The MEK is far too valuable for them to allow it to disappear. Most recently, the MEK has been used by Mossad to assassinate Iranian nuclear scientists. This being so will make it even more difficult for UNAMI to transfer them to third countries. This ruthless use of the MEK as a mercenary terrorist force has a direct impact on the situation of the hostages trapped in the camp; their future becomes all the more uncertain. But then, it has been all along, the clear intention of the MEKs paymasters to keep the MEK intact as a terrorist entity in Iraq, in total disregard for the human beings involved.
Continued to page 5

UP TO DATE

N0. 41/MARCH 2011

Page 2

http://www.mojahedin.ws/en/?p=15905

The Vain Struggle to Keep Ashraf Open The ground reasons for the closure of Camp Ashraf are more than enough
... The ground reasons for the closure of Camp Ashraf are more than enough to present. The Iraqi Prime Minister, Nuri al-Maliki, made it clear that the camp had to be closed simultaneous with the exit of the American forces from Iraq. America also left the decision for the groups future to the Iraqi government. However, under outside pressures and to show its good-will for humanitarian reasons, the Iraqi Government agreed to extend the deadline for another six months, beginning October 2011 to the end of April 2012. However, a big bulk of MKOs propaganda machine is still concentrating on the issue of recognizing ...
Mojahedin.ws, March 27, 2012

All the current evidences indicate that the story of MKO is nearing its end in Iraq and closure of its bastion and the consequent expulsion of its insiders from Iraq are unquestionable. And the Rajavis themselves have come to learn the bare fact despite their advocates struggle on their behalf. Whatever we see coming out of the organizations propaganda apparatus drumming up support for the insiders and recognition of their rights is nothing more than a shrewd play by the leaders, with Rajavi at the top, to distract the outsiders from a different episode that is to occur in the future. The ground reasons for the closure of Camp Ashraf are more than enough to present. The Iraqi Prime Minister, Nuri al-Maliki, made it clear that the camp had to be closed simultaneous with the exit of the American forces from Iraq. America also left the decision for the groups future to the Iraqi government. However, under outside pressures and to show its good-will for humanitarian reasons, the Iraqi

Government agreed to extend the deadline for another six months, beginning October 2011 to the end of April 2012. However, a big bulk of MKOs propaganda machine is still concentrating on the issue of recognizing the rights of Camp Ashraf residents and strives on progress to keep the camp open and active in Iraq. Why is Rajavi on a struggle of securing his organizations stay in Iraq while he knows the efforts are foiled for certain reasons? Neither the Iraqi political potentiality allows the group to live nor does the organization itself feel safe to survive on the Iraqi soil, especially after the leaving of American forces. An idle organization with many imposed limitations would mean a rapid political and strategic deterioration and structural disintegration. The Iraqi government substituting the fallen dictator totally disappointed MKOs hope of having a replaced reliable patron. For clear as well as untold reasons Rajavi can neither continue his organizations stay on the Iraqi soil nor is Iraq willing to let it on its soil. In fact, further stay in Iraq is tantamount to an idle lingering that guarantees no political and strategic development for the organization. Besides, the heavy investment on some former American personalities and paying them thousands of dollars to speak in MKOs behalf in the groups occasionally held luxurious events resulted in much less than the least expectations. Above all, Rajavi came to the reality, particularly after the exit of American forces and handling the control of Ashraf to Iraq itself, that none of the orchestrated squawks and

Continued to page 3

UP TO DATE

N0. 41/MARCH 2012

Page 3

http://iran-interlink.org/?mod=view&id=11856

Jordan confirms rejection of building a camp for Iranian opposition to its territory
... A source in the Interior Ministry told Al Arab alyawm newspaper today that Jordan refused to agree the setting up of a camp "for the Iranian opposition, or any other opposition. Jordan is committed to its obligation that it should not interfere in the affairs of other countries." The source denied that Jordan was to have any discussions with any party for the construction of an Iranian refugee camp or reception of refugees. According to the newspaper, the Interior Ministry of Jordan was responding to a statement issued by National Council of Resistance of Iran (aka; Mojahedin Khalq, MKO, MEK, PMOI) which said ...
Kuwait News Agency, Amman, March 05 2012 Translated by Iran Interlink Link to the original news (Arabic) http://www.kuna.net.kw/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=2225086&Language=ar Amman - 5-3 (KUNA) - Jordan reported here today the country's categorical rejection of a suggestion by the Iranian opposition group based in Camp Ashraf in Iraq to build a camp on Jordanian territory until they move to other countries. A source in the Interior Ministry told Al Arab alyawm newspaper today that Jordan refused to agree the setting up of a camp "for the Iranian opposition, or any other opposition. Jordan is committed to its obligation that it should not interfere in the affairs of other countries." The source denied that Jordan was to have any discussions with any party for the construction of an Iranian refugee camp or reception of refugees. According to the newspaper, the Interior Ministry of Jordan was responding to a statement issued by National Council of Resistance of Iran (aka; Mojahedin Khalq, MKO, MEK, PMOI) which said that the organisation (MKO) proposed to the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton not to transfer around 3000 residents from Camp Ashraf to Camp Liberty, near Baghdad. They had proposed to be given residence on a temporary basis in the border area near Jordan under the supervision of the Red Cross and the High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) at their own expense in an area which the Red Cross and the United Nations used during the Iraq war in 2003 where tents housed tens of thousands of asylum seekers fleeing the war...
Continued from page 2

protests against the Iraqi Government and demonization of Nuri al-Maliki to prolong his organizations stay in Iraq could deter Iraqs decisiveness to expel the group. However, MKO has proved to be the untrusted party in any contract, the side that refuses to comply with the other side when there is a dispute to be settled peacefully. It spends big sums to challenge and its tone is hostile and threatening when called to parley. Typically, it is a shock and prepared to strike when you never expect it and double speaks when everything seems resolved and concluded. At least it is what has been going on during the past two months of the arrived agreement to move residents from Ashraf to Temporary Transit Location TTL. The deadline is nearing, less than two months, and still Rajavi is dillydallying. Probably, he is gambling on another trick to disappoint the Iraqi Government; but he has to be also alert to the possibility of a shock he never expects.

UP TO DATE

N0. 41/MARCH 2012

Page 4

http://iran-interlink.org/?mod=view&id=11991

Martin Kobler in the European Parliament

... Kobler appealed to the MEK, to refrain from propaganda and complained that the constant, unnecessary rhetorical attacks by the MEK and its supporters are hindering the UN and the Iraqis in their work. Fried said the key to success is not discussions about the conditions at Camp Liberty, but the progress of the work of the UNHCR. In a conversation with Mr Kobler following the meeting, we had the opportunity to inform him of our "Back to the Family" initiative and asked him to work to ensure that in individual discussions with the UNHCR the Ashraf residents are made aware as soon as possible that contact with their family members is available ...
Achtung Mojahedin, March 23 2012 Translated by Iran Interlink Link to the original (German) http://www.achtung-mojahedin.org/index.php? option=com_content&view=article&id=197:martin-kobler-im-europa-parlament&catid=83:middle-east&Itemid=200 On Wednesday, 21/03/2012 Martin Kobler, the UN Special Representative for Iraq and Head of the United Nation Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI), reported to the meeting of the Foreign Affairs Committee on the work of the UNHCR and UNAMI in Iraq and the current situation of the Iranian Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) in Camp Ashraf and Camp Liberty. As part of his description of the problems of resettlement of the Ashraf residents Kobler said that it demanded a cooperative attitude from the residents. The infrastructure at Camp Liberty was indeed improved, but the basic services are guaranteed. The capacity of the camp was for use by 4000 - 5000 U.S. soldiers and UN staff. This has been sufficient and would offer ample space. The medical care at Camp Ashraf, although confined to two doctors and six nurses, but also including use of hospitals outside of Liberty, is guaranteed. The establishment of a clinic inside the camp had, however, until recently been refused by the residents, said Kobler. In addition, there are ultra-modern kitchen facilities in accordance with U.S. standards, but these were rejected by the occupants. The U.S. special envoy for Camp Ashraf, Daniel Fried, said that the information that the United States has of the situation in Camp Ashraf and Liberty is consistent with Kobler's descriptions. The conditions at Camp Liberty are not nearly as bad as described by the MEK. Ali Akbar Rastgou Kobler appealed to the MEK, to refrain from propaganda and complained that the constant, unnecessary rhetorical attacks by the MEK and its supporters are hindering the UN and the Iraqis in their work. Fried said the key to success is not discussions about the conditions at Camp Liberty, but the progress of the work of the UNHCR. In a conversation with Mr Kobler following the meeting, we had the opportunity to inform him of our "Back to the Family" initiative and asked him to work to ensure that in individual discussions with the UNHCR the Ashraf residents are made aware as soon as possible that contact with their family members is available.

UP TO DATE

N0. 41/MARCH 2012

Page 5

http://irandidban.com/en/TopNews-From%20TTL%20to% 20third%20countries/17674

Continued from page 1

From TTL to third countries

UN, UNHCR, and ICRC can play the influential and unprecedented role to avoid turning the Temporary Transit Location to a new camp for more brainwashing of its residents by the MeK's leadership and its gang leaders Seyed Hojjat Seyed Ismaili, former member of the MeK's central council, Iran Didban, March 27 2012 Temporary Transit Location (TTL), which is going to be the only camp of MeK in Iraq, may be an end for the painful life of each member of this terrorist cult that that Rajavi has imposed to them. Over the next few months, Camp Ashraf will be completely blocked and its residents, whether they want or not, will be resettled in the TTL as Refugees- not Mujahedeen-e Khalq, or any other name. However, the MerK's obstruction and turbulence is still ongoing, so every moment it is expected from the terrorist group's leadership to adopt new positions. 25. Dec. 2011, that is considered a turning point and qualitative topic in the project of closing the MeK case in Iraq, now, with transfer of the other Camp Ashraf residents to the TTL, is entering a new phase of its developments. The existing evidences indicate that, although, European countries, U.S and the Zionist Regime already have made the most of the MeK, but, considering the terrorist cult a serious threat to the security of their citizens, almost none of them are willing to accept its members in their territory. Philip Giraldy, former CIA agent, in his recent article about the MeK's departure from camp Ashraf and final destination of its members, (the Mujahidin Khalq's Useful Idiots) which was inserted on the Antiwar website, says: "...There might be some problem in arranging the move, as few countries want to take the MEK supporters, fearing that they would have to be deprogrammed from their brainwashing." Also, according to the Habilian Foundation website (families of Iranian victims of terror), Antonio Guterres, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, on March 3 2012 in a meeting with Shia Soudani, the Iraq's Minister of Human Rights, announced the UNHCR's opposition with the granting asylum to terrorist group's members. At the meeting that was held in Geneva, Guterres said: "The UNHCR does not give asylum to groups, but it will be given only to individuals, if they quit violence." So, MeK Have a tough road ahead from TTL to European countries. Renounce of violence and rejection of the sectarian organization is the first and the most important step to pass this arduous path. Considering what was said above, UN, UNHCR, and ICRC can play the influential and unprecedented role to avoid turning the Temporary Transit Location to a new camp for more brainwashing of its residents by the MeK's leadership and its gang leaders.

If it wasnt because of the backing of Israel and the Neoconservatives, Rajavi would have had no choice but to open the doors of his closed totalitarian group and allow the individuals trapped inside to walk free. That is the aim of everyone on the ground working to resolve the situation in Iraq. In this respect it is no less the responsibility of the US Government to work with the international community to dismantle this terrorist group and rescue the hostages. But while the rest of the world is genuinely working toward a peaceful end to the camp and the release and resettlement of the hostages, it appears Secretary of State Clinton is somewhat ambiguous in her dealing with the situation. Based on a legal ruling, Clinton must make a decision by the end of March whether the State Department remove the MEK from its terrorism list or not. Presenting this as leverage she has introduced a unilateral condition to the MEKs removal from Iraq; if the MEK cooperate with UNAMI and the Government of Iraq, she has indicated, we will remove them from the US terrorism list. But cooperation with UNAMI is a legal obligation rather than an optional choice for the MEK. So what is really behind this position? On the surface this would appear as though the USG is prepared to do a political deal to get the MEK to leave Iraq (and in doing so gain credit with the Iraqi government). It is as though the MEK were a far distant uncontrollable threat to US security which needs careful handling to bring it under control before dismantling it. Nothing could be further from the truth. Everything that the MEKs western owners can do is being done to help the MEKs leader keep the doors to the camp closed, to keep the hostages inside and to deny them contact with their families even though this is against all humanitarian, moral or indeed criminal law. By talking about the terrorism list rather than talking about what is happening in Iraq Clinton is bowing to this pressure. Certainly if UNAMI is allowed to do its job properly with the support of all the international community there will not be an organisation left to be listed or not listed. By invoking the US terrorism list, the actual script appears to be whether the MEK can be more useful listed as terrorists or if they are not regarded as terrorists. This false choice disguises the real intent of its proponents which is to keep the group intact as a terrorist group so it can be rearmed and used. Secretary Clinton, indeed the whole government of America, needs to unhitch the politically charged consideration of the MEKs inclusion in the US terrorism list from the very real humanitarian situation in Iraq. If the USGs intention is really to deal properly with this terrorist group, it should reassert the humanitarian focus of American policy toward the MEK and unequivocally support the dismantlement process in Iraq.

UP TO DATE

N0. 41/MARCH 2012

Page 6

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/03/22/working-with-the-mek-is-bad-policy/

Working With the MEK is Bad Policy

...Iranians living under the regimes yoke hate the MEK. That is not regime propaganda; it is fact, one to which any honest analyst who has ever visited Iran can testify. Ordinary Iranians deeply resent the MEKs terrorism, which has targeted not only regime officials, but also led to the deaths of scores of civilians. During the Iran-Iraq Wara conflict that decimated cities and led to tens of thousands of civilian deathsthe MEK sided with Saddam Hussein. No Iranian will ever forgive that treason. Iranians see the MEK in the same manner that Americans view American Taliban John Walker Lindh ...
Michael Rubin, Commentary Magazine, March 23 2012 Alana Goodman is correct to highlight the current battle between Attorney-General Eric Holder and a bipartisan array of prominent former U.S. officials who have accepted hefty honoraria from Mujahedin al-Khalq (MEK) front groups, even though the State Department lists the MEK as a terrorist group. While cultivating prominent endorsers is one front in the groups public relations battle, the largest war and the reason the MEK has spent millions on former American officials is for their support in its battle to be delisted as a terrorist entity. There is no doubt that in the past, the MEK engaged in terrorism against Americans and that it has embraced a fiercely anti-Western ideology. Proponents of delisting the MEK, however, argue that the group has not engaged in terrorism against the United States or its interests for decades. The State Department may eventually be forced by the letter of the law to delist the MEK. That does not mean the group is entitled to any American support. The groups culpability in recent terrorist attacks in Iran is murkier. Still, it would be a mistake to boil the MEK issue and the question of U.S. supportdown to the terrorism listing, however. Working with the MEK is simply bad policy. Military action against Iran would delay the program only by a few years. True, the same estimate was made before Israels strike on the Iraqi nuclear reactor and Saddam Hussein never managed to rebuild his program, but it would be foolish to assume the same would occur. After all, the Iranians will not be stupid enough to invade Kuwait. The problem in Iran today is not simply the regimes nuclear ambitions, but rather the regime itself. To use the military to delay Irans nuclear programeffectively kicking the can down the roadwould be an irresponsible use of the military unless there is a policy in place to take advantage of the time won in any strike. The problem with those who would embrace the MEK is that it would undercut the chance for regime collapse. To ally the United States with the MEK would be as shameful as President Obamas moral inaction during the 2009 protests. Iranians living under the regimes yoke hate the MEK. That is not regime propaganda; it is fact, one to which any honest analyst who has ever visited Iran can testify. Ordinary Iranians deeply resent the MEKs terrorism, which has targeted not only regime officials, but also led to the deaths of scores of civilians. During the Iran-Iraq Wara conflict that decimated cities and led to tens of thousands of civilian deathsthe MEK sided with Saddam Hussein. No Iranian will ever forgive that treason. Iranians see the MEK in the same manner that Americans view American Taliban John Walker Lindh. If the MEK is delisted, let the MEK celebrate. But whether listed as a terrorist group or not, it would be wrong and counterproductive to embrace the group unless, of course, the goal of those for officials on the groups payroll is simply to aid the current regime in its efforts to rally its subjugated masses around the flag.

UP TO DATE

N0. 41/MARCH 2012

Page 7

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2012-03/25/ c_122878754.htm

Continued from page 8

Iraqi PM says Baghdad summit to discuss terrorism

Xinhua, English News China, March 26 2012 BAGHDAD, March 25 (Xinhua) -- Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al- Maliki said Sunday that participants of the coming Arab League (AL) Baghdad summit will discuss terrorism that has struck the Arab world. Maliki made the remarks during a meeting with visiting AL Secretary General Nabil al-Arabi just days before the AL summit in the Iraqi capital on March 29, Maliki's office said in a statement posted on its website. "The agenda of the upcoming Baghdad summit will tackle the issue of terrorism which struck all the Arab countries," the statement quoted Maliki as saying. Iraq can show a clearest example for the danger and the devastating impacts of terrorism, as the country has long suffered from terrorism which claimed the lives of many of its innocent people, Maliki told Arabi. He stressed that Iraq will do its best to give a success to the Arab summit, and will present its vision to help resolve various issues raised on the agenda of the summit. For his part, Arabi expressed his admiration for Iraq's " excellent" preparations for the summit, the statement said. Arabi and his accompanying delegation arrived in Baghdad earlier Sunday to discuss the final touches for the ministerial meetings on March 27 and March 28, as well as the summit on March 29. Baghdad said earlier that it has completed the preparation for the summit and is ready to receive the Arab leaders despite sporadic violence across the country, which is seen as a setback to the Iraqi efforts to restore normalcy ahead of the summit. Iraq sees the summit as a significant milestone in its history that would lead the country to play a powerful and positive role in the Arab world.

forces since 2003, agreed to be moved last month. U.S. troops withdrew from Iraq in December. Also known as the People's Mujahideen Organization of Iran, the group led a guerilla campaign against the U.S.-backed Shah of Iran during the 1970s that included attacks on U.S. targets. As a result, the United States placed it on its list of foreign terrorist organizations. The group has said that it has renounced violence. BAN ON FINANCIAL SUPPORT Americans are banned from providing financial and other support to any group included on the so-called "Foreign Terrorist Organization" list, and its members or representatives are banned from entering the United States. Representatives for the group, which has also received support from several former senior U.S. government officials, had urged the court to intervene and force the administration to act or take the step itself of removing the group from the list. "Such relief would - despite the PMOI's long history of terrorism - remove an important barrier to the PMOI's ability to operate freely in the United States, and is clearly unwarranted here," the State Department told the court. "Moreover, an order directing the Secretary to act by a particular date is also inappropriate given the highly complex and delicate overall nature of the matter pending before her," it said. The State Department also warned that court action "would seriously interfere" with its efforts to resolve the Camp Ashraf situation. A lawyer for Iranian opposition group, Viet Dinh, said that they would respond by the April 2 deadline set by the court. "The important thing to recognize from the brief is that the Secretary recognizes her responsibility to delist the PMOI if it does not meet the statutory criteria, and she does not have any discretion to keep the group on the list simply out of national security concerns," he told Reuters. The appeals court has deferred a decision on whether it will hear oral arguments in the matter. The case is In re: People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 12-1118. (Editing by Mohammad Zargham)q

UP TO DATE

N0. 41/MARCH 2012

Page 8

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/03/26/us-iran-iraq-usa-court-idUKBRE82P16820120326

U.S. urges court to stay out of decision on Iranian group

... The State Department urged the court to stay out of the matter, saying it was continuing to evaluate the matter, consulting with the intelligence community and other government agencies and that it had met with representatives of the Mujahadin-e Khalq. Further, in its reply to the appeals court, the department repeated what Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said last month to U.S. lawmakers: that they were closely watching the group's cooperation in closing its Camp Ashraf base in Iraq. The group, which calls for the overthrow of Iran's Islamist government, has been based in Iraq. It was supported by former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein ... Jeremy Pelofsky, Reuters, Washington, March 27 2012 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration on Monday urged a U.S. appeals court not to interfere with its review and decision-making process over whether to remove the Iranian dissident group Mujahadin-e Khalq from a U.S. terrorism blacklist. The group asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to order the State Department to either remove it from the list or require action within a specified period on its request to delist the group. The State Department urged the court to stay out of the matter, saying it was continuing to evaluate the matter, consulting with the intelligence community and other government agencies and that it had met with representatives of the Mujahadin-e Khalq. Further, in its reply to the appeals court, the department repeated what Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said last month to U.S. lawmakers: that they were closely watching the group's cooperation in closing its Camp Ashraf base in Iraq. The group, which calls for the overthrow of Iran's Islamist government, has been based in Iraq. It was supported by former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, but is no longer welcome in Iraq under the Shi'ite-led government that came to power following the 2003 U.S.-led invasion and Saddam's downfall. The Iraqi government plans to expel the residents of Camp Ashraf and is in the process of moving them to a processing center at a former U.S. military base in Baghdad. Camp residents, who numbered about 3,000 and had been under the protection of the U.S.
Continued to page 7

www.aawaassociation.com
.
UP TO DATE NO. 41 MARCH 2012

Publication of Association AAWA e.V. Responsable: Dipl.-Ing. Ali-A. Rastgou Postfach 90 31 73 D-51124 Kln E-mail: info@aawaassociation.com