Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
FLUID RESPSONSIVENSS
Definition: fluid responsiveness denotes an increase in cardiac index after infusion of a fluid either crystalloid or colloid.
FLUID RESUSCITATION
3 DIFFERENT SCENARIO
Patients in the ERS for acute blood losses or body fluid losses
No therapeutic dilemma regarding hypovolemia
hemodynamic instability requiring therapy Cumulative fluid balance Risk of pulmonary oedema/ raised IAP
? Fluid responsiveness
Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011 Vol. 39, No. 2; John H. Boyd, Jason Forbes, MD; Taka-aki Nakada, Keith R. Walley,
James A. Russell,
retrospective review of the use of intravenous fluids during the first 4 days of care. Patients: VASST study enrolled 778 patients septic shock and receiving a minimum of 5 ug of norepinephrine per minute.
A more positive fluid balance both early in resuscitation and cumulatively over 4 days is associated with an increased risk of mortality in septic shock.
Central venous pressure may be used to gauge fluid balance <12 hrs into septic shock but becomes an unreliable marker of fluid balance thereafter. Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
PRELOAD
CONTRACTILITY
CARDIAC INDEX
normal heart
Stroke volume
preload-dependence preload-
failing heart
preload-independence preload-
Ventricular preload
Ubaidur Rahaman, S.R., CCM, SGPGIMS, Lucknow
ASSESSMENT OF PRELOAD Filling pressures- CVP, Pawp Filling volumes- LVEDV/ RVEDV VENACAVAL DIAMETER- variation with respiration RAP - inspiratory fall ASSESSMENT OF PRELOAD DEPENDENCE
VR
Function of
CVP
CARDIAC PUMP
VR- function of
Vs
Vu
P
Vs- Stressed volume; Vu- unstressed volume
C.O.
Q
is determined by
intersection
Q
of
RETURN FUNCTION
CARDIAC FUNCTION
Pra
Pra
Pra
How to use CVP measurements. Magder S. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2005, 11:264270
CONCEPT OF LIMIT
Q
Limit of RETURN FUNCTION Limit of CARDIAC FUNCTION
Pra
How to use CVP measurements. Magder S. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2005, 11:264270
Body does everything to maintain homeostasis adequate transmural pressure MCFP more accurate measurement of volume status- difficult to measure Ppawp is an even worse indicator than CVP as it is far removed from the action of MCFP RAP and Ppaw do not always reflect true transmural pressure in patients on PEEP, increased IAP
The correlation between CVP and circulating blood volume has never been found simply because it does not exist
Does Central Venous Pressure predicts fluid responsiveness? A systemic review of literature and the tale of seven mares.
Paul E. Marik, M. Baram, B. Vahid. Chest 2008;134:172-178
Expansive literature search to identify all trials evaluating the relationship between
2. 1. CVP & blood volume association between CVP or CVP and fluid responsiveness
24 studies identified 5 comparing CVP with measured blood volume; -19 studied relationship between CVP/CVP & change in cardiac performance after fluid challenge
Poor correlation between CVP and blood volume CVP or CVP and homodynamic response to fluid challenge overall 56% patients responded to fluid challenge
From medline (since 1966) Twelve studies were analyzed in which the parameters tested were as follows: (1) static Indicators: RAP, PAOP, RVEDV, LVEDA; (2) dynamic parameters: inspiratory decrease in RAP, ddown, PPV, aortic blood velocity(Vpeak) Before fluid infusion, static indicators were not significantly lower in responders than in nonresponders. When a significant difference was found, no threshold value could discriminate responders and nonresponders.
Before fluid infusion, inspiratory variation in RAP,SPV ddown, PPV, and Vpeak were significantly higher in responders. Positive predictive value: 77- 95%, negative predictive value: 81- 100%
o RVEDV o LVEDV
Assessment OF PRELOAD
Spontaneous breathing
This variation is affected by intravascular volume ( hydrostatic pressure) Less intravascular volume--- more variation
Assessment OF PRELOAD
In healthy subjects inspiration decreased IVC diameter by approx. 50%. This cyclic change is abolished in high volume status, right ventricular failure, cardiac tamponade. Applied Physiology in Intensive care Medicine. Pinsky, Mancebo. page 145
Assessment OF PRELOAD
IVC distensibility index (dIVC) 18% predictive of increase in C.I. of at least 15%
Sensitivity-90%, Specificity-90% divc=(Dmax-Dmin)/ Dmin
Respiratory changes in inferior venacava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients.
Barbier C, Jardin F. Inten Car Med 2004;30:1740-6
Assessment OF PRELOAD
Assessment OF PRELOAD
Assessment OF PRELOAD
Respiratory variation in VENACVAL DIAMETER
Assessment OF PRELOAD
16 of 19 patients who had a fall in RAP 1 mmHgC.O. increased by> 250 ml/ min with fluid challenge
FLUID CHALLENGE
45
PLR
71 mechanically ventilated patients considered for volume expansion. 31 patients had spontaneous breathing activity and/or arrhythmias.
homodynamic status assessed at baseline, after PLR, after volume expansion (500 mL NaCl 0.9% infusion over 10 mins)
In both groups, PLR induced increase in aortic blood flow 10% predicted volume expansion induced increase in aortic blood flow 15% (sensitivity- 97%, specificity 94%)
Immediate effect of PLR following induction of anesthesia for cardiac surgery in 18 patients
Baseline Cardiac output ( l/min) PAOP ( mmHg) SPV ( mmHg) dDown ( mmHg) PLR Change (%) 23 10 48 56
Paw Ppl
Transmural pressure
cardiac chambers/ great vesseles
PAlv Palv
Transpulmonary pressure
alveoli
Filling gradient of RV
PVR
RV preload
RV afterload
LV stroke volume
RV stroke volume
Transmural pressure
cardiac chambers
alveolar vesseles
LV afterload
LV preload
LV stroke volume
Predominant mechanism in LV systolic dysfunction Predominant mechanism in hypervolemia
RV preload RV ejection Pleural pressure transpulmonary pressure RV afterload LV ejection LV afterload LV ejection LV preload Aortic velocity Stroke volume Systolic B.P. Pulse Pressure Aortic velocity Stroke volume Systolic B.P. Pulse Pressure
MAXIMUM AT END OF INSPIRATION
LV preload
dup inspiratory increase in systolic pressure: increased LV Stroke volumeincreased preload decreased afterload Increase in extramural aortic pressure
Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis induced hypotension
Taverneir B, Dupont J. Anesthesiology 1998, 89:1313-1321
ddown- threshold value of 5 mmHg was associated with Increase in stroke volume 15% Positive predictive value- 95%, Negative predictive value- 93%
dup- increase in hypervolemia and LVF ddown-not increased in RVF despite hypovolemia
In the presence of large dup, the PPV, SPV and SVV will be less effective in predicting fluid responsiveness
*cardiovascular monitoring Chapter 32, page 1327, Millers Anesthesia 7th edi
Relation between Respiratory Changes in Arterial Pulse Pressure and Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Patients with Acute Circulatory Failure
F. MICHARD, S. BOUSSAT, D. CHEMLA, NADIA ANGUEL, MICHAEL R. PINSKY, and JEAN-LOUIS TEBOUL
VE 106 21 90 13 12 4 14 3 29 6 4.0 0.9 75 64 Threshold value of 13% was associated with increase in C.I. 15% in response to volume expansion Sensitivity- 94%, specificity96%
MAP
(mmHg) (mmHg)
Pcwp
(mmHg)
(l/min/m2)
PPV SPV
(%) (%)
Inspiratory increase in pleural pressure increase in SPV Increase in extra-mural pressure Equal increase in Systolic pressure And Diastolic pressure no change in PPV
RSVT slope
Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systollic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, et al Br J Anaesth 2005;95:74655
since during critical illness maintenance of the cardiac output may depend upon right ventricular function, the clinician need to be able to discern the presence of right ventricular dysfunction
William Hurford, 1988
It is commonly said that a teacher fails if he has not been surpassed by his students
-Edmond H. Fischer
o PPV
Pulse pressure depends on stroke volume and arterial compliance Change in compliance may affect degree of PPV induced by increase in stroke volume Elderly- stiff arteries--- small increase in stroke volume--- large PPV Young healthy adult- large increase in stroke volume relatively small PPV
CVP
o Effect of pleural pressure o Effect of PEEP on pleural pressure
less than half of PEEP is transmitted to the pleural space even less than that in pathological condition that require higher PEEP--- ARDS PEEP <=10 cm H2O = 8 mmHg----- change in pleural pressure2-3 mmHg
but at PEEP>10 changes in pleural pressure at end expiration become significant
Fluid challenge
o Rapidity of fluid infusion is important- faster the fluid is given, lesser the amount to be given type of fluid- crystalloid or colloid does not matter Change in CVP and not the volume of infusion that is important Blood pressure is not a good guide as to whether C.O. increased with fluid infusion In patients in whom C.O. increased there was no increase in B.P. ( Bafaqeeh F, Magder S. CVP and volume responsiveness of cardiac output. Am J
Respir Crit Car Med 2004, 169: A 343
o o o
Role of echocardiography
Assessment of inadequate resuscitation:
o o Volume status and responsiveness fluid resuscitation Cardiac contractility -- ionotrope
Effect of Positive Pressure Mechanical Ventilation on Hemodynamics PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION- PPV
contribution of transmission of pleural pressure effect on both systolic as well as diastolic pressure equally
Determination of aortic pressure variation during positive pressure ventilation in man. Denault, Gasior, Pinsky, Gorscan, Mandarino. Chest 2000;116:176-186