9 views

Uploaded by ucaptd3

ASTM003 Angular Momentum and Accretion Lecture 10 of 11 (QMUL)
astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, general relativity, quantum mechanics, physics, university degree, lecture notes, physical sciences
7
7.1
Week 10
The growth and settling of dust grains
The basic idea of how planetary formation occurs involves the build-up of large, rocky planetary cores/embryos by coagulation of the solid material in the protoplanetary disc. Initially, this involves the sticking together of dust grains, that gradually begin to settle towards the midplane of the disc as they grow. Dust then coagulates to form planetesimals, which in turn grow through mutual accretion into planetary embryos whose primary mod

- CBSE Class 5 Science or Question Bank (1)
- Cipher Wheel Solar System HOKIE
- Multiple Disk Gaps and Rings Generated by a Single Super-Earth: II. Spacings, Depths, and Number of Gaps, with Application to Real Systems
- solarsystem formation
- 2012Science-14+- 2
- What is Universe and Solar System
- VedicReport11-28-20144-52-52PM
- Believe in Astrology
- 100629_Leinhardt_protoplanets
- 14
- The Solar System
- Hit and Run Planetary Collisions
- nicole lesson demo one
- July 2018 The Political Observer Newspaper
- TASK 10: THROUGH UNIVERSE - VISITING PLANETARIUM
- Pratiti Geography
- Genesis John Gills Exposition Verse By Verse
- Interplanetary Missions
- Crop Circles Signs of Contact.pdf
- Tips to Analyze Transit Results of the Planets

You are on page 1of 8

7.1

Week 10

The growth and settling of dust grains

The basic idea of how planetary formation occurs involves the build-up of large, rocky planetary cores/embryos by coagulation of the solid material in the protoplanetary disc. Initially, this involves the sticking together of dust grains, that gradually begin to settle towards the midplane of the disc as they grow. Dust then coagulates to form planetesimals, which in turn grow through mutual accretion into planetary embryos whose primary mode of growth is accretion from the planetesimal swarm. We shall now consider the settling of dust grains towards the central plane of the protoplanetary disc.

Upper disc surface z=H g= z

2

Disc midplane

z=0

We can estimate the settling time in a quiescent (non-turbulent) disc. The component of the gravitational force in the z direction acting on a dust grain of mass mgr is GM mgr z r3 where M is the mass of the central star and r is the distance of the grain from the star. We may approximate r R and use the Keplerian result that GM/R3 = 2 , where is the angular velocity at the gas about the central star. The acceleration towards the midplane of the disc due to gravity is therefore gz = 2 z . The dust will therefore fall towards the central plane when we view the system in a rotating frame. As the dust grains move through the gas, the gas will exert a drag force on the grains, resisting their fall to the central plane. As a result, the grains will have a maximum velocity their terminal velocity. The drag force Fdrag acting on a spherical particle smaller than the mean free path of gas molecules moving with a speed much smaller than the sound speed is Fdrag = a2 cs v where a is the radius of the particle, is the density of the gas, cs is the sound speed of the gas and v is the velocity of the grain relative to the gas. The equation of motion for a grain of mass mgr then becomes mgr dv = Fdrag + mgr gz . dt 46

If the material of the grain has an internal density gr , this becomes 4 3 4a3 gr dv = a2 cs v a gr 2 z , 3 dt 3 (144)

where is the gas density. In practice, a grain will quickly reach the terminal velocity, so it will fall to the central plane with the terminal velocity for most of its journey through the disc. From equation (144), using the result that dv/dt = 0 when the terminal velocity is reached, we nd that the terminal velocity is 4agr 2 H 4agr 8agr H v = 3cs 3 3 (145)

where we have set z = H, used cs H from equation (60), and have approximated = 2H. The settling time to the central plane is s H/v 3 orbits . 8agr 16agr (146)

For 102 g cm2 = 103 kg m2 , gr 1 g cm3 = 103 kg m3 , a = 10 m = 105 m we get s 104 orbits = 105 yr at 5 AU. As the grains settle towards the midplane of the disc, they collide with other grains, stick together, and grow.

7.2

Consider a grain of radius a initially suspended at a height H above the disc midplane. After falling a distance z, it will increase its mass through collisions with other grains by an amount m = a2 nmgr z, where n is the number density of grains of mass mgr . Thus we can write an expression that gives the rate of change of the mass of the grain as a function of its height above the midplane dm = a2 nmgr . (147) dz The negative sign on the right hand side of this equation arises because the grain mass increases as its height above the midplane decreases. We note that the grain radius a= 3m 4gr

1/3

where gr is the internal density of the grains, and equation (147) becomes dm = dz 3m 4gr 47

2/3

nmgr .

(148)

The quantity nmgr is the mass volume density of solid material in the disc, and we may approximate this as 1 nmgr = , gd 2H where gd = 100 is the gas-to-dust ratio (this is normally taken to be approximately 100 based on measurements of the dust content of interstellar gas clouds). To obtain the mass of a typical grain when it reaches the midplane, we integrate equation (148) from height z = H to z = 0:

m(0)

m

m(H)

2/3

dm =

3 4gr

2/3

2gd H

z=0

dz.

z=H

Assuming that when a grain reaches the midplane its mass is much larger than its initial mass at z = H (i.e. m(0) m(H)), we obtain mz=0 3 4gr

2

2gd

The typical grain size in the dust layer that forms at the disc midplane through grain settling is thus 1/3 3mz=0 az=0 = . 4gr Adopting values that approximately apply at 1 AU in a MMSN disc model ( = 2104 kg m2 , gr = 103 kg m3 ), we obtain mz=0 = 0.057 kg and az=0 = 0.0247 m. Thus we see that the dust layer will be composed largely of centimetre sized pebbles !

7.3

Planetesimal formation

Further collisions and coagulation between the solid material within this pebble layer causes continued growth, and estimates based on computer simulations of particle > sticking suggest that large objects with sizes of a 1 10 km may be formed on a time scale similar to the grain settling time. Such objects are called planetesimals. Once such large objects have been formed, the eect of gravitational focusing becomes important when calculating the rate at which such objects collide to form larger objects.

7.4

We will consider the growth of a large planetary embryo by accretion from a background of smaller objects. Let the embryo mass be mc , the embryo radius be Rc , the background object/planetesimal mass be m, and the number density of background objects be n. The accretion rate is dmc 2 = n m v Rc dt 1+ 2Gmc Rc v 2 , (149)

where v is the velocity dispersion of the background objects. The term in brackets 1 + 2Gmc /(Rc v 2 ) on the r.h.s. of equation (149) is the gravitational focusing factor. 48

L

Rc

Consider the situation drawn in the diagram overleaf. An incoming object has velocity v and impact parameter L. The condition for the object being accreted is that it just grazes the accreting embryo, mc , so that its distance of closest approach must be Rc . Conservation of energy requires the velocity of the object at closest approach to be 2Gmc v2 + Rc and conservation of angular momentum requires that L v = Rc so that

2 L2 = Rc 1 +

v2 +

2Gmc Rc .

2Gmc Rc v 2

L is now the eective radius for collisions, and leads to the expression (149) for the mass accretion rate by the accreting embryo. Let us now consider two dierent growth regimes, the so-called orderly growth and runaway growth regimes. First, let us suppose that 2Gmc /Rc v 2 , such that the growing planetary embryo is responsible for stirring up the local planetesimal swarm (which it will do when it becomes massive compared to the background planetesimals), then we can write: dmc 2 = 2nmvRc . dt Writing the embryo radius in terms of its mass and density

2 Rc = 2/3

(150)

3mc 4c

we obtain dmc 3 = 2nmv dt 4c We can write the mass-doubling time scale as double = mc 49 dmc dt

2/3

m2/3 . c

(151)

and we obtain double mc such that lower mass embryos will double their masses on shorter time scales than larger embryos. If we work in terms of the planetary embryo radius, Rc , then we can write

2 4Rc c

1/3

(152)

Thus we have that Rc t and the planetesimal radius grows linearly with time. This is referred to as orderly growth, and occurs when the velocity dispersion of the background planetesimals is high or comparable to the escape velocity from the accreting embryo. Let us now suppose that 2Gmc /Rc v 2 , so that the gravitational focusing factor becomes important, then equation (149) may be approximated by Rc Gmc dmc = 2nmv . dt v2 If we write the embryo radius in terms of its mass and density then we get dmc 2Gnm = dt v and we can see that the mass-doubling time double = mc dmc dt

1 1/3 mc .

(154)

3 4c

1/3

m4/3 c

(155)

(156)

In this growth regime, the more massive an embryo is, the faster it doubles its mass. This mode of growth is called runaway growth, because planetesimals which are slightly more massive than their surrounding neighbours can grow very rapidly and detach themselves from the background mass distribution. This is how a swarm of planetesimals of initially similar masses can evolve into a system consisting of planetary embryos embedded in a planetesimal swarm. We now consider the growth time scale in the runaway growth regime in more detail. We can write nm = s , the density of solids, in the disc and v Hs , where Hs is the thickness of the solid layer. Equation (154) may now be written as Gs mc dmc = dt v2

4/3

3 4c

1/3

(157)

where we have made the approximation s = s /(2Hs ), where s = surface density of solids, and have replaced the embryo radius Rc in terms of its mass, mc and density c . Integrating equation (157) gives

1/3 1/3 3 mc (0) mc (t)

= 50

Gs v2

3 4c

1/3

(158)

which shows that the time for the embryo to grow from an initial mass mc (0) to a larger mass at time t, denoted by mc (t), depends inversely on the initial embryo mass. The time required to grow to masses much larger than mc (0) may be approximated from equation (158) to be 3mc (0) t Gs

1/3

4c 3

1/3 2 Hs

(159)

where we have used v = Hs . If we take the values c 1 gm cm3 (103 kg m3 ) and s 1 gm cm2 (10 kg m2 ), (i.e. gas to dust ratio = 100), then we can write t 1010 mc mEarth

1/3

Hs R

M M

1/2

R R

1/2

years.

(160)

Suppose that we have 10 km sized planetesimals with mc 1018 g = 1015 kg, and further assume that the dispersion velocity of the planetesimals is equal to the escape velocity from their surface (i.e. the planetesimal velocities are stirred by mutual gravitational interactions). In this case we nd that Hs /R 104 , and the growth time of a planetary embryo of similar mass in orbit around a solar mass star at 1 AU is t 2 105 yr. This number is signicantly shorter than the expected life times of protostellar discs, as required.

7.5

How large can a planetary embryo grow by accreting from the surrounding planetesimal swarm ? This question is answered by consideration of the feeding zone of an embryo, dened to be the surrounding annulus in the disc from which it is able to accrete planetesimals. The size of this annulus is set by the maximum distance over which the planetary embryos gravity is able to perturb planetesimal orbits so that they can collide. We dene the half-width of this annulus by amax = C.RHill where C is a constant and RHill is the embryos Hill radius dened by RHill = a The isolation mass is given by miso = 2a.2amax .s (161) mc 3M

1/3

where s is the surface density of solids (planetesimals), a is the semimajor axis of the embryo. Substituting for amax gives miso = 4a.C.a 51 miso 3M

1/3

.s ,

(162)

3/2 3

aC

3/2

1 3M

1/2

3/2 . s

(163)

Detailed computation of the stability of planetesimal orbits perturbed by a planet gives C = 2 3. Taking s = 100 kg m2 at 1 AU gives miso = 0.07 M , suggesting that the terrestrial planets in our Solar System did not form by embryos simply accreting planetesimals in their feeding zones. At a distance of 5 AU, using the same solids surface density s = 100 kg m1 , we obtain miso 9 M . This is in reasonable agreement with the estimated masses of the rock and ice cores at the centres of Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. The situation with Jupiter is more uncertain since here the core mass estimates are more sensitive to assumptions about the equation of state for hydrogen under mega-bar pressures which is not well-constrained.

7.6

We conclude with a short discussion about terrestrial planet formation by summarizing briey the main stages of the process: 1. Dust particles agglomerate to form, eventually, planetesimals. Most likely this occurs via pairwise collisions, though how (or whether) this process can work for cm to meter scale particles remains somewhat murky. There may be a role for gravitational instability. 2. Growth beyond planetesimals occurs via direct collisions, with an increasing role for gravitational focusing as masses become larger. Dynamical friction keeps the velocity dispersion of the most massive bodies low. Gas drag keeps the velocity dispersion of the the planetesimals low. A phase of runaway growth occurs in which a few bodies grow rapidly at the expense of the rest. 3. Runaway growth ceases once the largest bodies become massive enough to stir up the planetesimals in their vicinity. A phase of oligarchic growth ensues, in which the largest objects grow more slowly than they did during runaway growth, but still more rapidly than small bodies. Growth continues in this mode until the isolation mass is approached, at which point growth slows further. 4. Further evolution occurs as a result of collisions between the initially relatively isolated planetary embryos left over after oligarchic growth. The embryos are perturbed onto crossing orbits due to the inuence of the giant planets and mutual secular resonances. The nal assembly of the terrestrial planets takes around 100 Myr, with the predicted conguration varying depending upon the assumed surface density of planetesimals and existence (or not) of giant planets. In the Solar System, the nal giant impact on the Earth is widely considered to have given rise to the ejection of enough mass into orbit around the proto-Earth to subsequently form the Moon. This lunar-forming impact has been dated to have arisen at 60 Myrs after the formation of the Sun. This dating has been achieved using the isotopic ratios of 186 W and 182 W (Tungsten). Early in the 52

history of the Solar system, radioactive Hafnium 182 Hf decays into 182 W with a half-life of 9 Myrs. 182 Hf is considered to be a lithophile element, which means that if the Earth becomes completely molten it will remain in the Silicate mantle and crust which forms on cooling. 182 W on the other hand is considered to be a siderophile element, meaning that it prefers to follow the heavy element iron as it sinks to the centre of the Earth to form the core. By measuring the amout of 182 W to 186 W in the Earths crust at the present time, it is possible to calculate the time after the formation of the Sun when the Earth was last molten - which occured during the last lunar-forming giant impact. The dominant uncertainties in theoretical models for terrestrial planet formation are arguably found during stage 1 the formation of planetesimals. It is also true that most simulations of the late stages of terrestrial planet formation lead to planetary eccentricities that are slightly larger than those observed in the Solar System. This signals the need for additional dissipation at late epochs, possibly from the dynamical eect of a surviving population of smaller bodies.

53

- CBSE Class 5 Science or Question Bank (1)Uploaded bymeenasi
- Cipher Wheel Solar System HOKIEUploaded byEsther Prieto Chiné
- Multiple Disk Gaps and Rings Generated by a Single Super-Earth: II. Spacings, Depths, and Number of Gaps, with Application to Real SystemsUploaded byFábio Duarte
- solarsystem formationUploaded byapi-266532919
- 2012Science-14+- 2Uploaded by박찬우
- What is Universe and Solar SystemUploaded byLV Regencia-Lopez Cuenca-Fernandez Martin
- VedicReport11-28-20144-52-52PMUploaded byAashishh Patil
- Believe in AstrologyUploaded byMichael Erlewine
- 100629_Leinhardt_protoplanetsUploaded byEugene Maningas Escario
- 14Uploaded bythuyb2608
- The Solar SystemUploaded byaayush.mudgal
- Hit and Run Planetary CollisionsUploaded byCraig Mawson
- nicole lesson demo oneUploaded byapi-300387240
- July 2018 The Political Observer NewspaperUploaded byThe Political Observer Newspaper
- TASK 10: THROUGH UNIVERSE - VISITING PLANETARIUMUploaded byAleksandra Molenda
- Pratiti GeographyUploaded bySouvik Banerjee
- Genesis John Gills Exposition Verse By VerseUploaded byRUDY792
- Interplanetary MissionsUploaded byAdrian Arasu
- Crop Circles Signs of Contact.pdfUploaded byMario Petrak
- Tips to Analyze Transit Results of the PlanetsUploaded byHoracio Tackanoo
- Sector 001Uploaded byJan Grisanti
- Jyotish New Researches on NadiUploaded bySeema Goyal
- A New World 840Uploaded byjsaghini1982
- John Unit PlanUploaded bywaldilopez
- Science Quiz BeeUploaded byAlyssa Torio
- The Role of the NodesUploaded byshivaprasadam
- the bitcoin financial astrology forecast - december 2013 editionUploaded byapi-242416308
- Rag Hub AbuUploaded byideations
- @west news Vol. 3 Issue 3Uploaded byatwestnews
- RevModPhys.19Uploaded bySuppiya Siranan

- FCM Branch cut integrals (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Laplace Transform inversions (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Wave Equation (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Analytic Continuation by Contour Deformation (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Waves on a String (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Wielandt theorem (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Hankel Representation for Gamma Function (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Wronskian solution (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Laplace Transform properties (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Papperitz equation (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Harmonic Response Plot (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Arcsin function defined as an integral (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Hypergeometric equation (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Zeta equation (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Harmonic Plot Problem sheet 2 Q.6 (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- The Collision Between the Milky Way and Andromeda - Cox and LoebUploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Airy equation (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Analysis I (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- IA Matrices Notes (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- IA Geometry Lecture Notes (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Hermite equation (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- VCUploaded byperlhacker_indo
- FCM-Functions Defined by IntegralsUploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Frobenius method of series solution outline (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- ND Mathematical Methods Lecture notesUploaded byucaptd3
- 1977 Possible Ultimate Fate of the Universe - J. N. IslamUploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Cauchy Principal Value (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- Dimensional Analysis Lecture (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Fourier Transform properties (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3
- FCM Gaussian Integrals (Cambridge)Uploaded byucaptd3

- CARRIER Duct DesignUploaded byBudiman Raharjo'bjo'
- report 2011-05-07.okUploaded byYGWH
- Fracture Wb145 CAEA 0Uploaded byAmine Bou
- Lecture 1 NotesUploaded byrobbie_delavega7000
- Introduction to theory of machines, mechanics of machines, mechanics of materialsUploaded byArif Zain
- Phy Bk2Ch2Uploaded byJavens Leung
- 1_2_Introduction.pptxUploaded byNagesh Nayak
- newtons first law theoretical questions answer keyUploaded byapi-293162935
- Mechanics of Solids Nr210302 November AmUploaded byNizam Institute of Engineering and Technology Library
- Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic LoadUploaded byasmasm123
- Simulation of Kinetic Friction in L Bending of Sheet MetalsUploaded bymaziar60
- Chequered PlateUploaded byMythili Bysani
- Calculation Formulas For PipesUploaded byalecugeorgescu
- BME-Module1Uploaded byAnonymous VDnLHNG7QQ
- Experiments in Physics for MiLABUploaded byemmstark009
- 450x 200 Us Sbm6 Grid 6_a-dUploaded byadera1
- Transformation of Mechanical EnergyUploaded bykairawr
- NS101 UniverseModule ExtraStudyQuestionsFall2016Uploaded bybidsitlov
- Sprinkler Head Revisited Momentum Forces and Flows in Machian PropulsionUploaded bygusaleman
- Cantilever Sheet Pile WallUploaded byDwiana Fitriani
- physic_traducido.pdfUploaded byBrashan Cassidy
- Lecture - 20 Applied Rheology 4Uploaded bydev11739
- Corrected Page Physics sheetUploaded byAt Tanwi
- Examples MomentumUploaded byettypasewang
- MasteringPhysics 2.pdfUploaded byAlpha Benit Ngongo
- EarthquakeUploaded byNupur Bhadra
- AIEEE Plus Module 11Uploaded byMOHAMMED ASIF
- HMT R07 May Jun 2010Uploaded bybalakalees
- livro. Concepts of force, Max Jammer.pdfUploaded byHalwaro Freire
- The Thermal Behavior Analysis in Tap-Hole AreaUploaded byMateus Zandomeneghi