Conclusions

are vital in your essays, below are examples of questions and then conclusions suited to that question. Why were many Americans opposed to immigration in the 1920s?
Ergo, it can be argued that Americans did oppose immigration in the 1920s. This can be seen due to the following factors; the changing attitudes towards immigrants with the introduction of testing, the fear of revolution, competing for jobs, and increase in crime rates, racism and cultural differences and lastly the introduction of acts. Therefore the argument continues that America wanted to keep itself pure, not mix blood and increase it supremacy, leading to an increasing in opposing views towards immigration. As you can see it is vital that you answer the question directly and then provide evidence for your answer. Here are some more examples: Political self interest was the motivation behind reform how accurate is this view of the liberal governments decision to introduce welfare reforms between 1906 and 1914. Concluding all of the above factors, it could be argued that welfare reforms were not introduced due to one factor, but a mix of all factors. The argument can be further developed as many of the factors would be made more influential by the introduction of a secondary factor such as national efficiency and Booth and Rowntrees reports. Therefore leading to the conclusion that Political self interest was the motivation behind reform is not entirely accurate.

How important was the role of pressure groups in Britain becoming more democratic between 1851 and 1928? Ergo, it can be argued that pressure groups never played an important role in leading Britain towards a more democratic way between 1851 and 1928. Other influential factors such as political change, social and economic change, changing political attitudes, and influence from other countries may have had a more powerful impact over Britains democratic evolution. It can also be

argued that without pressure groups such as the NUWSS and the WSPU acts such as the 1918 Representation of the People Act would not have been passed. Although the argument still stands that the other factors had a more influential role, furthering the point that the role of the pressure groups, although important in some aspects, was not entirely vital. How successful were the Welfare Reforms of the Labour government 19451951 in meeting the needs of the British people? Ergo, it can be argued that the Labour government did deal with the problems and met the needs of the British people sufficely. Although at points the Labour government did not deal with the problem directly, they did set up a foundation that future governments could work upon. The introduction of the said acts, and the action that the government took, strengthens the argument and the point that the Labour government met the needs of the British people between 1945-1951.