Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 1, Issue 2, October 2012 ISSN 2319 - 4847
A NEW APPROACH FOR CONGESTION CONTROL IN WIRELESS NETWORK AND ANALIZE IT FOR TCP
Manjeet Kaur Bedi1, Kendar Pratap2 and Raj Kumari3
1
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a congestion control mechanism of various versions of TCP in Wireless Network and techniques for provides performance improvement in terms of throughput and window size variations. When multiple synchronized servers send data to a same receiver in parallel, for many important Data center applications and Research. So in this way many-toone traffic pattern is common. In this paper, we study TCP in-cast congestion may severely degrade their performances by increasing response time also we study among TCP throughput, round trip time (RTT) and receive window. Our idea is to design an ICTCP (In cast congestion Control for TCP) scheme at the receiver side. In particular, our method adjusts TCP receive window proactively before packet drops occur. The implementation and techniques demonstrate that we achieve al-most zero timeout and high good put for TCP incast. In this paper, we discuss a cross layer congestion control technique of TCP and MAC in wireless networks also avoidance system control congestion.
Keywords: TCP, Adaptive, per- flow, Congestion, Reno, Data center synchronized, ow control.
1. INTRODUCTION
Wireless networks are inherently limited by battery power and bandwidth constraints. They are characterized by Mobility, random changes in connectivity, uctuations in channel and interference due to neighboring nodes etc. In this way packet loss of a wireless network is much more than that of a wired network, in which packet loss occurs mainly due to congestion in the network. In this paper both TCP layer and PHY layer jointly control congestion. The PHY layer changes transmission power as per the channel condition, interference received and congestion in the network, whereas the TCP layer controls congestion using Reno-2 window based ow control. Congestion in a network is characterized by delay and packet loss in the network. So Transport Control Protocol (TCP) is used as a reliable transport layer protocol in the traditional.
Page 63
5. SOLUTION TO PROBLEM
There must be some mechanism to tackle the problem of packet losses due to bad channel condition and interference, such that we can extend the congestion control mechanism of wired network to wireless network for solve the problem.
Page 64
7. CONCLUSION
This paper demonstrates Congestion avoidance system control and Congestion Control in Wireless. Network streams may be delivered the throughput of all TCP connections and the available bandwidth wireless networks. It presents a brief overview of the need for congestion controlled window and in particular describes the use of the TCP. Ideal platform for convenient experimental research in wireless multi- networks Quick response to network dynamics reduced channel congestion in wireless multi- networks significant fairness improvement for TCP. Most of the traffic in the Internet is TCP traffic. Cross layer Congestion control technique provides performance improvement In terms of throughput and window size variations TCPs congestion control in wired network is based on Adaptive Window Management technique. In this TCPs congestion control mechanism does not discriminate packet loss due to congestion and that due to bad channel or interference, rather apply the same congestion control mechanism for both.
REFERENCES
[1] J. H. Schiller, Mobile Communications. Addison-Wesley, 2000. [2] F. P. Kelly, Charging and rate control for elastic trafc, European Transactions on Telecommunications, vol. 8, pp. 3337, January 1997. Corrected version of the original paper is available at http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/frank/elastic.ps. [3] M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi, S. Floyd, and A. Romanow, TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options, vol. RFC2018, April 1996. [4] S. Ryu, C. Rump, and C. Qiao, Advances in Internet congestion control, IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 3, pp. 2839, 2003. [5] V. Jacobson, Congestion avoidance and control, in ACM SIGCOMM88, (Stanford, CA), pp. 314329, August 1988. [6] R. Braden, V. Jacobson, and L. Zhang, TCP extensions for highspeed paths, vol. RFC-1185, October 1990. [7] L. S. Brakmo, S. W. OMalley, and L. L. Peterson, TCP vegas: New techniques for congestion detection and avoidance, in Proc. of IEEE SIGCOMM, pp. 2435, 1994. [8] S. Shenker, Fundamental design issues for the future internet, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 13, September 1995. [9] S. H. Low, A duality model of TCP and queue management algorithms, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 4, pp. 526536, August 2003. [10] S. H. Low, F. Paganini, and J. C. Doyle, Internet Congestion Control, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 2843, February 2002. [11] M. Chiang and R. Man, Jointly optimal congestion control and power control in wireless multihop networks, in Proc. of GLOBECOMM, 2003. [12] C. Courcoubetis and R. Weber, Pricing Communication Networks: Economics, Technology and Modelling. West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons, 2003. [13] D. P. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming. Athena Scientic, 2nd ed.,1999.
Page 65