http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/515-sigma816f4556apsc?start=1 Sigma 8-16mm F/4.5-5.6 on Canon APS-C Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical 420 USD www.stuc incustoms.

com/hdr-tutorial/ www.vanilladays.com/hdr-guide/ http://www.digital-photography-school.com/setting-up-your-digital-camera-for-hdr -shooting 9:58 PM woolrist Not been in the game for 10 years but just dipped my toe in with a 600D, how do Sigma lenses compare with canon these days & does IS deg rade quality? 9:59 PM georgesi IS does not degrade quality at all 9:59 PM georgesi Sigma Wide Angles / Standard lens are pretty comcarable to Canon. Canon Zooms and Telephotos are a lot better IMHO 10:03 PM woolrist Anyone experience with the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS HSM, sounds good on paper for the price. 10:19 PM isaacco no, though I now someone who swears by their copy of it s non-OS predecessor on a Canon mount. 10:22 PM fremonj I''ve got a sigma 10mm fisheye and the reviews say it''s better than the Ni on equivalent 10:27 PM georgesi I must admit I''ve always stuc to Canon lens bu t the new Sigma 8-16mm loo s ind of interesting 10:27 PM fremonj i had a 15mm Sigma FE bac in my Canon days and had no c omplaints ========== http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/hot-deals/1138428/ --------------http://www.teamten.com/lawrence/projects/video-camera-on-model-roc et/ http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Canon-Lenses/Field-of-View-Crop-Factor.aspx vignette hipstamatic autostitch tiny planet wedding 24-70 f2.8 70-200 f4/f2.8 50 f1.4 50mm are good for low light, but depth of field restricts you to single subject shots. You really need a flash for weddings inside. As a second photographer, I'd stic to candids with a longer lens. The wedding pics you can see in the earlier lin is a good example of what I was trying to describe to Viva. f2.8 and 800 ISO and no flash. dof is o ay but with D300 you start to see grain at 800 which you don't with the D700 and D3. But one is as sl

ow as 1/30s and you can see motion blur. http://photo.net/learn/wedding/ www.pbase.com/crabtree http://www.digital-photography-school.com/your-best-friends-wedding http://www.dere pyephotography.com/ http://www.dpchallenge.com/tutorial.php?TUTORIAL_ID=45 Combe, Chris start reading this site > http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutor ials.htm it will help 5:49 PM Easwarasharma, Ramchandran //Rohan Machado nice pictures Ram , as usual. Were these all hand held ?.. --> Than s Rohan. I had the camera sit ting on a tripod for the Vettel and Button shots. However, the ballhead was loosened to al low me to use it as a Wimberley head so that i could move the camera around when I ta e shots and tighten the head so that I dont have to lug it around when I'm not sho oting. It wor ed better than the occasions when I used my tripod as a monopod wi th only one leg extended (for the Webber shot). Madhava, please ta e a loo at this example image http://betterphotography.in/wp -content/uploads/2011/02/Lead-Highres.jpg