Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Module III Strategic Choice
Ramesh Bagla
Strategic Choice
Re-visit the Mission
Revise, create, or maintain mission
Set Long-Term Objectives Generate feasible alternatives Evaluate alternatives Choose the best strategic option
Stage 2: The Matching Stage Re-visit Mission and Set Long Term Objectives
Generate feasible alternative Corporate Strategies
Stars (II)
?
Cash Cows (III) Dogs (IV)
Low
- 20
QUESTION MARKS
High growth, Low market share
Most businesses start of as question marks. They will absorb great amounts of cash if the market share remains unchanged, (low). Why question marks? Question marks have potential to become star and eventually cash cow but can also become a dog. Investments should be high for question marks.
STARS
High growth, High market share
Stars are leaders in business. They also require heavy investment, to maintain its large market share. It leads to large amount of cash consumption and cash generation. Attempts should be made to hold the market share otherwise the star will become a CASH COW.
DOGS
Low growth, Low market share
Dogs are the cash traps. Dogs do not have potential to bring in much cash. Number of dogs in the company should be minimized. Business is situated at a declining stage.
Question Marks
Investmentheavy initial capacity expenditures and high R&D costs Earningsnegative to low Cash-flownegative (net cash user) Strategy Implications
If possible to dominate segment, go after share. If not, redefine the business or withdraw
Stars
Investmentcontinue to invest for capacity expansion EarningsLow to high earnings Cash-flowNegative (net cash user) Strategy Implications
Continue to increase market shareeven at the expense of short-term earnings
Cows
InvestmentCapacity maintenance EarningsHigh Cash-flowPositive (net cash contributor) Strategy Implications
Maintain market share and cost leadership until further investment becomes marginal
Dogs
Investment
Gradually reduce capacity
Strategy Implications
Plan an orderly withdrawal to maximize cash flow
BCG Matrix - Three Paths to Failure Over invest in cash cows and under invest in question marks
Trade future opportunities for present cash flow
BENEFITS
BCG MATRIX is simple and easy to understand. It helps you to quickly and simply screen the opportunities open to you, and helps you think about how you can make the most of them. It is used to identify how corporate cash resources can best be used to maximize a companys future growth and profitability.
LIMITATIONS
BCG MATRIX uses only two dimensions, Relative market share and market growth rate. Problems of getting data on market share and market growth. High market share does not mean profits all the time. Business with low market share can be profitable too.
CONCLUSION
Though BCG MATRIX has its limitations it is one of the most FAMOUS AND SIMPLEST portfolio planning matrix, used by large companies having multi-products. M&M and HLL are using the BCG MATRIX.
GE Matrix
Originally developed by GEs planners drawing on McKinseys approaches, it is also known as the Directional Policy Matrix Market attractiveness is based on as many relevant factors as are appropriate in a given context Business strengths assessment also made on many factors
Each SBU needs to be rated on each factor
GE Matrix
Indicators of Industry Attractiveness
Market size Market growth rate Cyclicality Barriers to entry and exit Industry profitability Technology Regulation Workforce availability Social and environmental issues Political and legal issues
27
GE Matrix
Indicators of SBU Strengths
Market Share Sales force Marketing strengths R&D Manufacturing facilities Distribution Financial resources Managerial competence Competitive position in terms image, breadth of product line, quality, reliability, customer service etc.
GE Matrix
Depending on the location of a business within the Matrix, one of the following approaches is suggested: 1. Invest to grow 2.Invest selectively and manage for earnings 3.Harvest or divest for resources
29
GE Matrix
Industry Attractiveness
High Medium Low
High
Business Strength
Medium
Low
GE Matrix
Segment 1: This is the best segment. The business is strong and the market is attractive. The company should allocate resources in this business and focus on growing the business and increase market share Segment 2: The business is either strong but the market is not attractive or the market is strong and the business is not strong enough to pursue potential opportunities. Decision makers should make judgment on how to further deal with these SBUs. Some of them may consume too much resources and are not promising while others may need additional resources and better strategy for growth.
31
GE Matrix
Segment 3: This is the worst segment. Businesses in this segment are weak and their market is not attractive. Decision makers should consider either repositioning these SBUs into a different market segment, develop better cost-effective offering, or get rid of these SBUs and invest the resources into more promising and attractive SBUs.
32
GE Matrix
STRENGTHS
Uses more comprehensive measures / variables in assessing industry attractiveness and business strength / competitive position Doesnt lead to as simplistic conclusions as the BCG matrix Nine cell approach allows for intermediate rankings between high/low and strong/weak Stresses channeling of resources to areas with the greatest probability of achieving competitive advantage and superior performance
GE Matrix
WEAKNESSES
Provides no real guidance on the specifics of what strategy to follow its too general Cant spot units that are about to become winners because their industries are entering the takeoff stage Use of numeric estimates seems objective, but is really very subjective Should the weights & factors used to assess industry attractiveness and business position be used generically, or adjusted depending on the industry under investigation?
EARLY DEVELOPMENT
EVOLUTION
-----------------------------MATURITY / SATURATION -----------------------------DECLINE / STAGNATION -----------------------------ONLY ONE DIMENSION IS DIFFERENT FROM THE GE Matrix Except for the Stage of Market Evolution, this model is identical to the GE Business Screen
Can be used to identify and track developing winners Illustrates how the firms businesses are distributed across the stages of industry evolution
Corporate Strategies
Three Key Issues: Firms directional strategy Firms portfolio strategy Firms parenting strategy
Corporate Strategies
Directional Strategy:
Orientation toward growth
Expand, cut back, status quo? Concentrate within current industry, diversify into other industries? Growth and expansion through internal development or acquisitions, mergers, or strategic alliances?
Maximize Strengths
Grand Strategy A master long term strategy that provides basic direction for major actions directed towards achieving long term business objectives
Grand Strategies
Vertical Integration Acquisition of firms that supply inputs or customers for its outputs Conglomerate Diversification Acquiring or entering businesses unrelated to firms current products, markets or technologies
Vertical Integration
Some of the best known examples of vertical integration have been in the oil industry. In the 1970s and 1980s, many companies that were primarily engaged in exploration and the extraction of crude petroleum decided to acquire downstream refineries and distribution networks. Companies such as Shell and BP came to control every step involved in bringing a drop of oil from its North Sea or Alaskan origins to a vehicle's fuel tank.
48
Vertical Integration
The idea of vertical integration was taken a step further by Dell Computer Michael Dell combined the traditional vertical integration of the supply chain with the special characteristics of the virtual organisation to create virtual integration Dell assembles computers from other firms' parts, but it has relationships with those firms that are more binding than the traditional links between buyer and supplier. It does not own them in the way of the vertically integrated firm, but through exchanges of information and a variety of loose associations it achieves much the same aimwhat Michael Dell calls a tightly coordinated supply chain.
49
Vertical Integration
Vertical integration is a difficult strategy for companies to implement successfully. It is often expensive and hard to reverse Upstream producers frequently integrate with downstream distributors to secure a market for their output. This is fine when times are good. But many firms have found themselves cutting prices sharply to their downstream distributors when demand has fallen just so they can maintain targeted levels of plant utilisation.
50