Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Need for public transport Importance of bus transport Description of BRT BRT project in Delhi
Cars/ Taxis
Two Wheelers
TSR
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
YEAR (1981-2006)
2006
50 cars
or 60 bicycles
or 1 bus
More equitable allocation of road space with people, rather than vehicles
Greater use of public transport and nonmotorized modes Reserving lanes and corridors exclusively for public transport and nonmotorized modes of travel
8
According to Para 12.5 (iv) of the Plan On all roads with right of way (ROW) greater than 30 meters exclusive bus lanes will be planned to implement the Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) in a phased manner to cover the whole city.
10
11
Pune
Ahmedabad
Indore
Bhopal
Jaipur Vishakhapatnam Hyderabad Nagpur Delhi
13
Lloyd Wright
MRT
Bus
London
Singapore
Hong Kong
Delhi
14
It combines the advantages of rail transit with flexibility of Bus service It is endorsed by institutions such as World Bank, Asian Development Bank etc. Being green it is the only transport project with the availability of World Bank GEF funding
ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY: by way of reducing private vehicles and using green fuel
EFFICIENCY: by way of providing more throughput per unit of investment or road space
15
In BRT commuters can only cross at the zebra crossings. Fatality rates will come down drastically. Experts observe that road based transport provides the most effective connectivity for residents. The Delhi BRT project has been implemented after rigorous analysis and consideration
16
ADVANTAGES OF BRT
BRT is on AT GRADE LEVEL so builds easier access BRT is a relatively inexpensive mode hence can be implemented more widely BRT can penetrate in less ROW areas
BRT Builds Flexibility
Gestation time is relatively short BRT has more stoppages and therefore provides user friendly changeover points
Shortest planning & construction time BRT - 1.5 years / Metro 3- to 5 years (~18km)
Curitiba, Brazil
20
22
Pedestrian path
Bus lane Car lane Bicycle lane
3 m x 2m
3.3 - 3.5 m 3.0 m X 2 None
23
Pedestrian path
Bus lane Car lane Bicycle lane
4mx2
3.3 - 3.5 m x 2 3.0 m x 4 Mixed
24
PEOPLE FLOW CAPACITIES Mode Bus (dedicated lane) Persons per lane (3m) per hour 15,000 25,000
50% people with no option but public transport Marginal cost of two wheeler trip about Rs 1.00 per km Maximum fare level cannot be higher Mixed land use patterns, strict zoning impossible Majority trips less than 10 km
GURGAON
FARIDABAD
SALIENT FEATURES OF SOLUTION FOR DELHI: AMBEDKAR NAGAR- DLEHI GATE CORRIDOR
The first corridor of BRT in Delhi is from Ambedkar Nagar to Delhi Gate. It is 14.5 km. long with minimum ROW at 28 meters and maximum ROW at 51.5 meters. Total cost of the project is Rs. 215 crores at an average cost of Rs. 14.83 crores/ km
27
Peak Hour Density Ambedkar Nagar- Press Enclave Chirag Delhi - Andrews Ganj 93 75
217
129 419
28
A total of 20 bus stops along the corridor are planned Generally 100-200 buses move on various sections during peak hour catering to a maximum PHPDT of about 10000 on an average day. Road width of 6.75m for MV will increase throughput as there will be no obstructions from mixed traffic (Buses, pedestrians, cycles and rickshaws) The project has been implemented after rigorous analysis and intensive stakeholder consultation and validated by national and international transportation experts This includes the benefits of the central bus lane over side bus lane.
29
Mode of Transport
Two wheeler
Three wheeler Car Taxi Bus Others
17.59
2.80 6.94 0.06 62.0 10.61
30
6m
7m
2m
11m
11m
2m
MV LANE
BUS LANE
BUS LANE
MV LANE
FOOT PATH SERVICE LANE NMV TRACK FOOT PATH FOOT PATH
2m
10m
6.75m
3.3m
3.3m
6.75m
2.5m 2m
BREST WALL
2m
3.3m
2m
31
Side lane: High friction from turning vehicles reduce capacity and efficiency
EVENNING
Total of six lanes are crossed at a time EXISTING SYSTEM , side bus lane
Total of three lanes are crossed at a time BR SYSTEM central bus lane
Parking space for paratransit, scooters, cycles is generated. Central bus lanes allow for passenger parking on side lanes and interchange with other modes on the side without disrupting existing circulation to adjoining areas
34
Signal and telecom cabling not duplicated Preferential signaling to buses is easier Manpower deployment is optimized
35
36
37
38
Traffic Volume
28-02-2008 24-04-2008
Vehicles
11,449 11,767
39
40
41
42
It does not matter what is done, traffic jams will become worse; unless a radically new model is adopted.
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
Total Number of Vehicles, February 28, April 24 and May 01- 07, 2008 (Figures in Number)
2,394 2,422 9,159 2,204 6,441 2,406 9,033 1,593 6,822 2,082 9,884 1,821 2,583 9,286 8,835 2,329 10,591 10,993
87,897
1,13,099
1,00,362
1,13,951
1,15,089
79,067
1,09,641
1,05,763
1,24,465
February 28 28
(Thursday)
April 24
(Thursday)
May 01
(Thursday)
May 02
(Friday)
May 03
(Saturday)
May 04
(Sunday)
May 05
(Monday)
May 06
(Tuesday)
May 07
(Wednesday)
Motorized Vehicles 44
Non-motorized Vehicles
Buses
THANK YOU
DIMTS Ltd.