Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Based on the breakdown of a sample into atoms, followed by the measurement of the atoms absorption or emission of light. - Deals with absorbance fluorescence or emission (luminescence) of atoms or elemental ions rather then molecules - atomization: process of converting sample to gaseous atoms or elementary ions - Provides information on elemental composition of sample or compound - UV/Vis, IR, Raman gives molecular functional group information, but no elemental information. - Basic process the same as in UV/Vis, fluorescence etc. for molecules
h
Absorbance
E1 Eo
Fluorescence
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy absorption of electromagnetic radiation promotion of electron to higher energy state log of transmittance is proportional to concentration
AA
Lamp
Atomizer+Sample
Monochromator
Detector
AE
Atomizer+Sample Monochromator
Detector
Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy excitation caused by absorption of EMR followed by radiative decay to lower energy state fluorescence signal is directly proportional to concentration
Lamp
AF
Atomizer+Sample
Monochromator
Detector
Flame AA and AE Furnace (Electrothermal) AA only Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AE only
Flame AA and AE Well established Good speed Moderate sensitivity Few interferences (well understood) Low-moderate cost Operating temperature: 1700-3200C
Furnace (Electrothermal) AA only Well established Slow Single element Excellent sensitivity Many interferences Moderate-high cost Operating temperature: 1200-3000C
Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) AE only Established and growing Fast Multi-element Moderate sensitivity Spectral interferences High cost Operating temperature: 6000-8000C
Common Applications
Analysis Time
Sample preparation (0 sec to 24 hr) Analysis after calibration 10 -120 sec.)
Limitations
No information on chemical form of metal Sample prep can be tedious Limited to metals/metalloids Destructive
Linear Range
In single metal mode: 103 above LOD For higher concentrations use dilution.
Detection Limits
Flame AA : 0.1 to 1.0 g/mL Furnace AA : 0.01 to 0.1 g/mL
Flame AAS
Advantages Robust. Easy to use. Fast analysis time. Modest cost. Disadvantages Flammable gases. Detection limits.
Furnace AAS
Advantages g masses & L volumes. LOD 10-100 < flame. No gases. Easily automated. Disadvantages Longer analysis times. Interferences. Higher cost. Lower accuracy (1-5%).
Schematic of AA/AE
AE
AA
Laminar nonturbulent streamline flow Sample, oxidant and fuel are mixed Only finest solution droplets reach burner Most of sample collects in waste Provides quite flame and a long path length
Types of Flame/Flame Structure Selection of right region in flame important for optimal performance
- primary combustion zone (blue due to emission from C2, CH & other radicals) - not in thermal equilibrium and not used - interconal region - region of highest temperature (rich in free atoms)
- often used in spectroscopy - can be narrower in some flames (hydrocarbon) tall in others (acetylene)
Temperature varies significantly across flame need to focus on part of the flame
Flame profile: depends on type of fuel and oxidant and mixture ration
, , , , , ,
, , , , ,
Consequences: - Sensitivity varies with element - must maximize burner position - multi-element detection difficult
Process: uses element to detect element 1. ionizes inert gas to high potential (300V) Ar Ar+ + e2. Ar+ attracted to - cathode & hits surfaces 3. As Ar+ ions hit cathode, some of the deposited element is excited and dislodged into gas phase (sputtering) 4. excited element relaxes to ground state and emits characteristic radiation - advantage: sharp lines specific for element of interest - disadvantage: can be expensive, need to use different lamp for each element tested.
Electrothermal (Lvov or Graphite furnace) - place sample drop on platform inside tube - heat tube by applying current, resistance to current creates heat - heat volatilizes sample, atomizers, etc. inside tube - pass light through to measure absorbance
Po
P
Place sample droplet on platform
Electrothermal (Lvov or Graphite furnace) : advantages: - all sample used - longer time of sample in light beam - lower limit of detection (LOD) - can use less sample (0.5 10) disadvantage: - slow (can be several minutes per element or sample) - not as precise as flame (5-10% vs. 1%) - low dynamic range (< 102, range of detectable signal intensity) * use only when there is a need for better limit of detection or have less sample than Laminar flow can use Laminar Flow Burner advantages: - good b (5-10 cm) - good reproducibility disadvantages: - not sample efficient (90-99% sample loss before flame) - small amount of time that sample is in light path (~10-4 s) - needs lots of sample