Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Flat Slabs
Instructions for the Members of BIBM, CEMBUREAU, EFCA and ERMCO: "All or part of the information contained herein may be used, translated and adapted at national level with reference and credit to the original publication issued by the European Concrete Platform". (See guidelines) It is the responsibility of the Members (national associations) of BIBM, CEMBUREAU, EFCA and ERMCO to translate and/or adapt this publication within their national framework, to publish it under their own name and logo and to disseminate it to their contacts at national level. The logo of the European Concrete Platform cannot be used at national level. It is the responsibility of the Members (national associations) of BIBM, CEMBUREAU, EFCA and ERMCO to submit for authorisation the national version of the Concise Eurocode 2 and the "How to leaflets" to their respective national standardisation committee responsible for the Eurocodes.
7. Flat slabs
Introduction
This should be redrafted as appropriate in a country
Designing to Eurocode 2
This guide covers the analysis and design of concrete flat slabs to 1 Eurocode 2 . Eurocode 2 does not contain the derived formulae or specific guidance on determining moments and shear forces. This has arisen because it has been European practice to give principles in the codes and for the detailed application to be presented in other sources such as textbooks. The first guide in this series, How to design concrete structures using 2 Eurocode 2: Introduction to Eurocodes , provides an overview of Eurocodes including terminology. Where NDPs occur in the text in this publication, recommended values in EN 1992 are used and highlighted in yellow. The UK values have been used for NDPs embedded in figures and charts and the relevant NDPs are scheduled separately to assist other users in adapting the figures and charts.(derivations can be found at www.eurocode2.info). A list of symbols related to flat slab design is given at the end of this guide.
Analysis
The following methods may be used: Equivalent frame method Finite element analysis Yield line analysis Grillage analogy The Eurocode gives further advice on the equivalent frame method in Annex I. Once the bending moments and shear forces have been determined, the following guidance can be used for the design of flat slabs.
Design procedure
A procedure for carrying out the detailed design of flat slabs is shown in Table 1. This assumes that the slab thickness has previously been determined during conceptual design. More detailed advice on determining design life, loading, material properties, methods of analysis, minimum concrete cover for durability and bond, and control of crack widths can be found in another guide in this series, How to design 3 concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Getting started .
Fire resistance
Eurocode 2, Part 12: Structural fire design , gives a choice of advanced, simplified or tabular methods for determining the fire resistance. Using tables is the fastest method for determining the minimum dimensions and cover for flat slabs. There are, however, some restrictions and if these apply further guidance can be obtained from specialist literature. Rather than giving a minimum cover, the tabular method is based on nominal axis distance, a. This is the distance from the centre of the reinforcing bar to the surface of the member.
4
It is a nominal (not minimum) dimension, so the designer should ensure that a cnom + link + bar/2 The requirements for flat slabs are given in Table 2
Flexure
The design procedure for flexural design is given in Figure 1; this includes derived formulae based on the simplified rectangular stress block from Eurocode 2. Where appropriate Table 3 may be used to determine bending moments for flat slabs.
Whichever method of analysis is used, Cl. 9.4.1 requires the designer to concentrate the reinforcement over the columns. Annex I of the Eurocode gives recommendations for the equivalent frame method on how to apportion the total bending moment across a bay width into column and middle strips to comply with Cl. 9.4.1. Designers using grillage, finite element or yield line methods may also choose to follow the advice in Annex I to meet this requirement. Eurocode 2 offers various methods for determining the stress-strain relationship of concrete. For simplicity the method presented here is the simplified rectangular stress block (see Figure 2). The Eurocode gives recommendations for the design of concrete up to class C90/105. However, for concrete strength greater than class C50/60, the stress block is modified. It is important to note that concrete strength is based on the cylinder strength and not the cube strength (i.e. for class C28/35 the cylinder strength is 28 MPa, whereas the cube strength is 35 MPa).
Deflection
Eurocode 2 has two alternative methods of designing for deflection; either by limiting span-to-depth ratio or by assessing the theoretical deflection using the Expressions given in the Eurocode. The latter is dealt with in detail in another guide in this series, How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Deflection 5 calculations . The span-to-depth ratios should ensure that deflection is limited to span/250 and this is the procedure presented in Figure 3. The span-to-depth ratios are
appropriate where the structure remains propped during construction or until the concrete attains sufficient strength to support the construction loads. It can generally be assumed that early striking of formwork will not significantly affect the deflection after installing the cladding and/or 6 partitions .
Punching shear
The design value of the punching shear force, VEd, will usually be the support reaction at the ultimate limit state. Standard factors for edge and corner columns that allow for moment transfer () are greater in Eurocode 2. However, can be calculated directly from Expressions (6.38) to (6.46) of the Eurocode to give more efficient designs.
In Eurocode 2 the maximum value of shear at the column face depends on the concrete strength used. The control perimeters for rectangular columns in Eurocode 2 have rounded corners. Where shear reinforcement is required the procedure in Eurocode 2 is simple; the point at which no shear reinforcement is required can be calculated directly and then used to determine the extent of the area over which shear reinforcement is required. It is assumed that the reinforcement will be in a radial arrangement. However, the reinforcement can be laid on a grid provided the spacing rules are followed.
As an alternative to using shear links, proprietary shear stud rails may be used. Eurocode 2 (Figure 6.22) allows them to be laid out in a radial or cruciform pattern and gives spacing requirements for both. Other techniques are available for increasing punching shear resistance and these are covered in a best practice guide. Figure 6
Procedure for determining punching shear capacity
The procedure for determining the punching shear requirements is shown in Figure 6.
The exception is in areas with concentrated loads or areas of maximum moment where the following applies: For the principal reinforcement: 2h but not more than 250 mm For the secondary reinforcement: 3h but not more than 400 mm, where h is the depth of the slab. For slabs 200 mm thick or greater reference should be made to Section 7.3.3 of the Eurocode or How to design concrete 3 structures using Eurocode 2: Getting started .
Note
References
1 2 3 4 5 6
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
EN 199211, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures General rules and rules for buildings. NARAYANAN, R S & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Introduction to Eurocodes. The Concrete Centre, 2005. BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Getting started. The Concrete Centre, 2005. EN 199212, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. General rules structural fire design. WEBSTER, R & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Deflection calculations. The Concrete Centre, 2006. PALLETT, P. Guide to flat slab formwork and falsework. Construct, 2003.
EN 13224 - Ribbed floor elements EN 13747 - Floor plates for floor systems EN 15037-1 - Beam-and-block floor systems - Beams prEN 15037[-2 to -5] - Beam-and-block floor systems - Blocks EN 1168 - Hollow core slabs EN 13369-Common rules for precast concrete products
Acknowledgements
This guide was originally published by BCA and The Concrete Centre in the UK. The authors of the original publication were R Moss BSc, PhD, DIC, CEng, MICE, MIStructE and O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
Europeanised versions of Concise EC2 and How To Leaflets Convention used in the text
1. Nationally determined parameters that occur in the text have been highlighted yellow 2. Text is highlighted in pink indicates that some action is required on the part of the country adapting the documents for its use
Note NA = National Annex Table 2: Minimum dimensions and axis distances for reinforced concrete slabs Standard fire resistance REI 60 REI 90 REI 120 REI 240 Minimum dimensions (mm) Slab thickness, hs 180 200 200 200 Axis distance, a 15a 25 35 50
Notes 1 This table is taken from EN 199212 Table 5.9. 2 The axis distance is to the outer layer of reinforcement 3 The table is valid only if the detailing requirements (see note 4) are observed and, in the normal temperature design, redistribution of bending moments does not exceed 15%. 4 For fire resistance of R90 and above, at least 20% of the total top reinforcement in each direction over intermediate supports required by EN 199211 should be continuous over the full span. This reinforcement should be placed in the column strip. 5 There are three standard fire exposure conditions that may need to be satisfied: R Mechanical resistance for load bearing E Integrity of separation I Insulation Key a Normally the requirements of EN 199211 will determine the cover
Figure 1 Procedure for determining flexural reinforcement (assuming the recommended expression for, cc (=1.0) and c (=1.5)
START
Carry out analysis of slab to determine design moments (M) (Where appropriate use coefficients from Table 3)
No
K=
M bd 2 f ck
where
Is K
K ?
z=
d 1 + 1 3.0 K 0.95d 2
Check minimum reinforcement requirements (see Table 6) As,min = 0.26 fctm bt d/fyk where fck 25
Check maximum reinforcement requirements As,max = 0.04 Ac for tension or compression reinforcement outside lap locations
Table 3 Bending moment coefficients for flat slabs (Substitute data commonly used in the country) End support/slab connection Pinned Continuous End End span End End span support support 0 0.086Fl 0.04Fl 0.075Fl First interior support Interior spans 0.063Fl Interior supports 0.063Fl
Moment 0.086Fl Notes 1 Applicable to slabs where the area of each bay exceds 30 m2, Qk 1.25 Gk and qk 5 kN/m2 2 F is the total design ultimate load, l is the effective span 3 Minimum span > 0.85 longest span, minimum 3 spans 4 Based on 20% redistribution at supports and no decrease in span moments
Table 4 Values for K (assuming the recommended expression for and the recommended value for c) % redistribution 0 10 15 20 25 30
(redistribution ratio)
1.00 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70
Key a It is often recommended that K should be limited to 0.168 to ensure ductile failure Table 5 z/d for singly reinforced rectangular sections (assuming the recommended value for c) K 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 z/d 0.944 0.936 0.927 0.918 0.909 0.900 0.891 0.881 K 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.196 z/d 0.871 0.861 0.85 0.839 0.828 0.821
Table 6 Minimum percentage of reinforcement required fck 25 28 30 32 35 40 45 50 fctm 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.5 3.8 4.1 Minimum % (0.26fctm/fyka) 0.13% 0.14% 0.15% 0.16% 0.17% 0.18% 0.20% 0.21%
Determine Factor 1 (F1) For ribbed or waffle slabs F1 = 1.1 0.1 ((bf/bw) 1) 0.8 (bf is flange breadth and bw is rib breadth) Otherwise F1 = 1
Determine Factor 2 (F2) Where the slab span exceeds 8.5 m and it supports brittle partitions, F2 = 8.5/leff Otherwise F2 = 1.0
Determine Factor 3 (F3) F3 = 310/s Where s = Stress in reinforcement at serviceability limit state (see Figure 5) s can be assumed to be 310 MPa (i.e. F3 = 1.0) Increase As,prov
No
The Eurocode is ambiguous regarding linear interpolation. It is understood that this was the intention of the drafting committee.
Greek beta
Determine value of vEd,max (design shear stress at face of column) from: vEd,max = VEd/(ui deff) where: ui is perimeter of column deff = (dy + dz)/2 (dy and dz are the effective depths in orthogonal directions)
Determine value of vRd,max from Table 7 No Is vEd,max < vRd,max? Yes Determine value of vEd, (design shear stress) from: vEd,max = VEd/(u1 deff) where u1 is length of control perimeter(see Figure 8) Redesign slab
Determine concrete punching shear capacity (without shear reinforcement), vRd,c from Table 8 where l = ( ly lz)0.5 ( ly lz are the reinforcement ratios in two orthogonal directions for fully bonded tension steel, taken over a width equal to column width plus 3d each side)
Determine area of punching shear reinforcement per perimeter from: Asw = (vEd 0.75vRd,c)sru1/(1.5 fywd,ef) where sr is the radial spacing of shear reinforcement (see Figure 9) fywd,ef = 250 + 0.25 deff fywd (see Table 9)
Determine the length of the outer perimeter where shear reinforcement not required from: uout,ef = VEd/(vRd,cd)
Determine layout of punching shear reinforcement (see Spacing of punching shear reinforcement section and Figure 9)
Table 7 Values for vRd,max assuming the recommended values for , cc and c) fck 20 25 28 30 32 35 40 45 50 vRd,max 3.68 4.50 4.97 5.28 5.58 6.02 6.72 7.38 8.00
Greek rho
Effective depth, d (mm) 200 0.54 0.59 0.68 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.94 225 0.52 0.57 0.66 0.72 0.78 0.83 0.87 0.91 250 0.50 0.56 0.64 0.71 0.76 0.81 0.85 0.89 275 0.48 0.55 0.63 0.69 0.74 0.79 0.83 0.87 300 0.47 0.54 0.62 0.68 0.73 0.78 0.82 0.85 350 0.45 0.52 0.59 0.65 0.71 0.75 0.79 0.82 400 0.43 0.51 0.58 0.64 0.69 0.73 0.77 0.80 450 0.41 0.49 0.56 0.62 0.67 0.71 0.75 0.78 500 0.40 0.48 0.55 0.61 0.66 0.70 0.73 0.77 600 0.38 0.47 0.53 0.59 0.63 0.67 0.71 0.74 750 0.36 0.45 0.51 0.57 0.61 0.65 0.68 0.71
k 2.000 1.943 1.894 1.853 1.816 1.756 1.707 1.667 1.632 1.577 1.516 Notes 1 Table derived from: vRd,c = (0.18/c) k (100 I fck)1/3 0.035 k1.5 fck0.5 where k = 1 + (200/d) 2 and I = ( ly lz) 0.02, ly = Asy/(bd) and lz = Asz/(bd) and c =1.5 2 This table has been prepared for fck = 30; Where I exceeds 0.40% the following factors may be used: fck 25 28 32 35 40 45 50 Factor 0.94 0.98 1.02 1.05 1.10 1.14 1.19 Table 9 Values for fywd,ef deff 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 fywd,ef 288 294 300 306 313 319 325 331 338
Table 10 Factor, F, for determining Asw,min fck 25 28 30 32 35 40 45 Factor, F 1875 1772 1712 1657 1585 1482 1398
Selected symbols Symbol Ac As As2 As, prov As, reqd b d d2 fcd fck fctm hs K leff l/d M x xmax z Definition Cross sectional area of concrete Area of tension steel Area of compression steel Area of tension steel provided Area of tension steel required Width of slab Effective depth Effective depth to compression reinforcement Design value of concrete compressive strength Characteristic cylinder strength of concrete Mean value of axial tensile strength Slab thickness Factor to take account of the different structural systems Effective span of member Limiting span-to-depth ratio Design moment at the ULS Depth to neutral axis Limiting value for depth to neutral axis Value bh
cc fck/c
0.30 fck2/3 for fck C50/60 (from Table 3.1, Eurocode 2) See NA See Section 5.3.2.2 (1)
cc m 0
Lever arm Coefficient taking account of long term effects 1.0 on compressive strength and of unfavourable effects resulting from the way load is applied Ratio of the redistributed moment to the elastic bending moment Partial factor for material properties 1.15 for reinforcement (s) 1.5 for concrete (c) Reference reinforcement ratio fck/1000 Required tension reinforcement at mid-span to As/bd resist the moment due to the design loads (or at support for cantilevers) Required compression reinforcement at midAs2/bd span to resist the moment due to the design loads (or at support for cantilevers)