STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER EOC TARAPOTO TARAPOTO, PERU

CIVIL DESIGNER DATE : : Eng. Alfredo Zegarra Tambo December 2010

1. INTRODUCCION This is the design analysis for the structural design for the Emergency Operation Center TARAPOTO in TARAPOTO city, Department of TARAPOTO. This is a building compose by one story with light cover on a metal structure and other facilities for service with lighten slabs. This building has the following facilities. Reception Hall, Humanitarian Assistance, Press Room, Decisions Room, Mission Control Room, Generator and Pumping House, Radio Operators, Dormitory and EOC Directors Office. 2. CODES AND REGULATIONS Reglamento Nacional de Edificaciones. Norma Tcnica de Edificacin E-020 "Cargas". Lima, 1985 Reglamento Nacional de Edificaciones. Norma Tcnica de Edificacin E-030 "Diseo Sismo Resistente". Lima, 2003. Reglamento Nacional de Edificaciones. Norma Tcnica de Edificacin E-050 "Suelos y Cimentaciones". Lima, 1997. Reglamento Nacional de Edificaciones. Norma Tcnica de Edificacin E-060 Concreto Armado. Lima, 1989. Reglamento Nacional de Edificaciones. Norma Tcnica de Edificacin E-070 Albailera Armada, Lima, 1989.

3. STRUCTURE CHARACTERISTICS Building is designed based on a concrete masonry system with units of 39 x 14 x 19cm, units of liquid concrete (grout) of de fc=140 Kg/cm2, has an horizontal reinforcement 02 bars of every two rows and vertical reinforcement with 02 bars of according to distribution in structural drawings. Metal Structure that will support covering, is design with a truss system, composed by double angles of 1 x 1 x 3/16, meanwhile Beams and its reinforcement shall have double angles of 1 x 1 x 1/8, and diagonals shall be os steel bars 3/8.

Figure N 01. Isometric cover structure system

4. SOIL CHARACTERISTICS There is a composing by Sandy soil, according to soil investigation, this show us this following summary schedule: Foundation Type: Support Stratum: Foundation for walls shall be continuous connected by reinforced over foundation. There is existence of sandy material type SP-SM, bad granulated sand with low fines according to classification SUCS. It is recommended that the depth of the display of the foundation is: Df =1.10 m. The allowable capacity of foundation soil is: 1.27 Kg/ cm2 Maximum Settlement in this zone in both situations is 1.36 cm. It is considered as LOW. So cement to use for foundation shall be I Type. Setting of a layer of a maximum 10cm thick unless indication in drawings, its compression resistance shall be fc= 100 Kg/cm2

Foundation Depth:

Admissible Pressure: Settlement: Aggressively / Soil: Concrete base:

5. CALCULATION HYPOTHESIS Building was analyzed with tridimensional models. In this analysis was supposed a linear and elastic behavior. Reinforced concrete elements were represented by linear elements. Their stiffness was determined ignoring cracking and reinforcement. Masonry walls were modeled as shell elements, with stiffness of membrane and flexion. Material Properties The analysis considers fc = 210 kg/cm2. Concrete fc = 210 kg/cm2. (With Cement type V), in footing, reinforced over foundation, columns and beams. Concrete fc= 140 Kg/cm2 (with Cement type V) for floor slabs and foundations. Concrete fc= 100 Kg/cm2 + 30 % stone of 8-10 inches in every continuous subfoundations. Reinforcement steel shall be fy= 4200 Kg/cm2. Concrete Masonry Units shall be of minimum resistance of fm=74 kg/cm2 and Vm=8,60 Kg/cm2 which dimensions are 14x39x19 cm. Structural steel shall be fy= 2530 kg/cm2 and Fu=4080 Kg/cm2.

Every welding shall use protected electrodes E-6012 with a welding size of 3 mm or 1/8 (except detail in drawing).

Vertical Loads Vertical loads were evaluated according to Loads Code, E-020. For masonry walls was considered a specific weight of 1800 kg/m3. The overload was considered as 30 kg/m2, for metal structure. Weight for covering was considered as 15 kg/m2.

Seismic actions The seismic analysis was made according to current codes, NTE E-030 (2006), with superposition spectral modal procedure. Considering soil conditions, structural characteristics and use conditions, using seismic parameters indicated in the following schedule:

Seismic Analysis Parameters Zone factor (zone 3) Use and importante Factor Soil Factor (S2) Period to define spectrum of pseudo acceleration Answer reduction Z = 0.40 U = 1.50 S = 1.20 Tp = 0.60s Rx = 3.00 Ry = 3.00 This force is process determine, absolutes and relative displacements produced by seismic effect. Figure N 3 shows spectrum of pseudo accelerations (C/g).

ESPECTRO DE RESPUESTAS DE ACELERACIONES

1.40 1.20 Sa(m/seg2) 1.00 0.80 a ) 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.00
(NORMA E-030, 2003 RNC)

0.25

0.50

0.75 PERIODO (seg)

1.00

1.25

1.50

Figure 03. Spectrum of pseudo accelerations

Load Combinations Verification of reinforced concrete elements capacity was based on factor load procedure, according to Norma Tcnica de Edificacin E-060 Concreto Armado and Cdigo ACI 318. Load factors indicated in the following schedule. D = Permanent loads effects = = Live loads Seismic

L1 and L2 Sx and Sy

Factores de Carga Combinacin 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6.0 DESIGN RESULTS Quantities processed according to analysis and design results correspond as indicated in structural drawings. 7.0 METAL STRUCTURE Building has a metal structure roof, light type, has a structure conformed basically by steel elements. General elements are double angles of 1 x 1 x 3/16 for each element of the structure, meanwhile beams and reinforcements shall be made of 1 x 1 x 1/8, and its diagonals shall be steel bars of 3/8.
6

D 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 0.9 0.9

L 0 1.7 1.7 0 1.25 1.25 0 1.25 1.25 0 0

Sx 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 1.00 0

Sy 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00

Figure N 04. Structural model 8.0 CALCULATION HYPOTHESIS Metal Truss was analyzed with tridimensional models. The analysis supposed a linear and elastic behavior. Steel elements were represented as linear elements. Material Properties The analysis consider fy = 2350 kg/cm2. (Steel A-36) Vertical Loads Vertical loads were evaluated according to the code Norma de Cargas, E-020. 10.0 ANALYSIS RESULTS Results obtained from analysis of structure, gives necessaries structural elements specified in drawings.

11.0 DESIGN RESULTS Capacity verifications of elements was based on a factor load procedure, according to Norma Tcnica de Edificacin E-090. 12.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN Foundation capacity verification was base on a service load procedure, according to Norma Tcnica de Edificacin E-020 Cargas. Following there are results obtained.

FOUNDATION DESIGN CALCULATION

WALL DESIGN Z= U= S= N= 0,4 (Seismic zone 3) 1,5 (Importance of Structure) (Intermediate Soil 1,2 Factor) 1 (Number of stories of building) Checking, of wall density ZUSN / 56 = A mx / Ap = A my / Ap = MINIMUM THICK OF WALL H= t= 270 cm (Free height of masonry) 14 cm OK! 0,7200 0,0349 OK! 0,0279 OK! Amx = 11,7292 m2 Amy = 9,3835 m2

Ap =

335,90 m2

MEASSURE OF LOAD OF WALLS Data: t = s = Hs = cc = Hcc = S/C = t neta = Dead Load: Over foundation weight Masonry weight Beam weight Metal Structure weight. Cover wieght = = = = = 184,80 831,60 134,40 300,00 121,50 Kg/m Kg/m Kg/m Kg/m Kg/m
9

12.700,00 1.900,00 0,40 2.200,00

Kg/m2 Kg/m3 m Kg/m3

1,20 m 300,00 Kg/m2 9.000,00 Kg/m2

CM = Live Load : S/C = CV = Design Load: CM + CV = Foundation Width Calculation B= Shall use : B= Terrain Amplified Reaction Calculation Amplified External Load

1.650,92 Kg/m 243,00 Kg/m 243,00 Kg/m

1.893,92 Kg/m

0,21 m

0,65 m

PU1 = (1.4*CM) + (1.7*CV) PU1 = 2.724,39 Kg/m Terrain Amplified Reaction ut = PU1 / B ut = 4.191,37 Kg/m2 Foundation Design Transversal Uniform Load of Foundation w= w= Length of Foundation in overhead m = (B-0.14)/2 m= 0,290 m ut * 1m 4.191,37 Kg/m

Typical Section of Flextion Cut

Vx = w*(X-m) V(x =0) = 1.215,50 Kg

Mx= w*(m^2)/2 M(x=0) = 176,25 Kg.m

10

Transversal Section of Geometry bw = h= Checing of Resistance by cut Vn = *0.11*bw*h*(fc^0.5) Vn = Checing of ressistance by flextion 2.863,38 Kg Ok! = 0,55 100 cm 40 cm

Mn = *0.85*fc*Sm Mn = 17.453,33 Kg.m Ok!

Sm= bw*(h^2/ 6

11