Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Focus on ourselves as actors involved in different participatory processes. Observe an experience that has been presented as a study case Create the right spirit and motivation among the participants in order to work on the virtual platform.
PRESENTATIONS
of the facilitators of the participants of the project (previous experiences) Analyse the logo of the project, identity the key words and objectives.
Key words
People Diversity Growth Citizenship Network Foundations Sustainability Red Antenna Up, down, around Tree Antenna Impacts Together Multiply Transformation Circle Digital Dynamic Concentric Balance Expansion Opacity
Goals
Capacity building/ empowerment Resources development Questioning and transforming democracy Lobbying and advocacy Learn about concrete experiences, case studies and key elements; Foundations of participation and methodology; Interdisciplinary - to learn through the experience of others; To create a network; To create our on way to do. Exchange experience on a local level Conceptualize on the term of participatory democracy Undertaking initiatives at local and regional level
Precipitation, over thinking, too many opinions, concern about (focus on) my opinion. What helped Collective approach Attention to different profiles Trust Adaptation Cooperation Responsibility Participation vs. effectiveness (big group vs. small group) Organization + representation Plan Win-win Negotiation Conditions Support Process Communication Learning Safe environment Equity/ balance Initiative What didnt help Time, threat, opposition, risk, stress, challenge, rules.
Facilitators
Well defined goals Listen Trust Resources Team work Enough time Find a group Personal needs/ worries/ dreams Sense of belong Sharing Open to environmental stimuli Motivation Freedom Pleasure Balance Confrontation/ conflict Self/etero conscience Critical thinking/ different profiles Negotiation Adaptation In Motivation and sense of responsibility in the subject Self confidence Education Lack of time Fear (failure, acceptance, etc) No instruction Individual issues
Obstacles
Out Good communication Empathy Active listening To share a code Accessibility to physical information Means to participate and tools Accessibility Short process Feedback Possibility to interact and change the plan
Both possible facilitators or obstacles Compromise Communication Network Engagement Feeling that you can make it The difference Distance Time Resources Share values and goals Plan Transparency
What makes it go wrong? Whats internal/ inherent vs. external? Participative methodology maybe enforcing (not free) The shape is not important Short or long term processes? Crisis/ insecurity as obstacle or opportunity? Do different profiles make collective building impossible? How to generate trust between what is different importance of individual work during participatory process. How relations of trust and power are built in the process?
Presentation of the study case (Felix) Participants in groups elaborate the questions in order to establish a dialogue with the experience. WHO, IN WHAT, FOR WHAT, HOW. Susana: CLEAR model Lucrecia ppt
How
What for
Planning phase Priorities decision Implementation - monitoring (action) Evaluation/ follow up Other ideas Relevant to people; How open (flexible); Scale, context, external factors.
Summarising the objectives of the project and identification of the key elements: next seminar in Barcelona, in April. Work on the virtual Platform in order to share the how of our practices, create groups of collaborative work, and identify the topics of interest in order to plan the next seminar. Presentation of the actual situation of the platform. Discussion in order to adapt the platform to the needs of the project and the participants. Create a common calendar for the following activities until the next seminar.