Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Copyright 2012

Where Did the Towers Go?

B. WTC Evidence that Must be Explained 4

In addition to explaining why ej ecta is being propelled upward in what is officially said to be a downward "collapse," any model of the WTC's destruction, if that model is to be taken seriously, must seek to explain not some but all of the follo'W1.ng facts, although these "facts" may also be thought of as occurrences, questions, things, and anomalies. The alert reader may notice that not even this highly detailed book itself has been able to cover all of them:

1.

FACT: Although Hurricane Erin was located just off Long Island throughout the day of 9/11/01, both the approach in days before and the presence of the storm on that day went almost totally unreported. Hurricane Erin was omitted on the morning weather map, even though that portion of the Atlantic Ocean where she stood was covered by the map. Astronauts gazing down said they could see the drifting plume from the destruction of \"V'TC2 and W'TCl but made no mention of the highly visible Erin. WHY?

2.

FACT: Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were toasted in strange ways during the destruction of the Twin Towers. WHY AND HOW?

3.

FACT: During destruction, there appeared alongside the buildings curious cork­ screw trails, called in this book Silfysmngs. WHY?

4.

FACT: During the demise of each tower, large enough volumes of dust made of nano-sized particles went up, enough to block out 100% of sunlight in some areas. This nano-sized particulate dust in volume enough to achieve sun-light-blocking density constituted the remains of the greatest part of the destroyed buildings' material substance. WHAT CAUSED THIS DUST TO FORM?

5.

FACT: During the destruction, there was an absence of high heat. Witnesses reported that the initial dust cloud felt cooler than ambient temperatures. Additionally, there was scant evidence of burned bodies, although in one case a man was described as "crisped" even while his jacket remained uncrisped, indicating an "inside-out" combustion not possible with conventional fire. WHAT CAUSED THESE PHENOMENA?

6.

FACT: Evidence that the WTC dust continued to break down and become finer and finer long after 9/11 itself came through the observable presence of Fuzzballs. WHAT CAUSES THIS PHENOMENON?

7.

FACT: First responders on 9/11 testified as to toasted cars, spontaneous "fires" (including the flaming heavy coat of a running medic, who survived), the instant disappearance of people, a plane turning into a fireball in mid-air, electrical power cut off moments before \"'V'TC 2 destruction, and the sound of explosions. WHAT

480

Reprinted With Permission From Dr. Judy Wood

Unauthorized Reprinting/Copying Prohibited

icially

nodel

facts,

s, and

itself

ut the

,torm

In the

re she

~e the

:ntion

luring

cork-

de of

areas.

cking

lings'

.esses

tures.

case

sped,

HAT

finer

tballs.

'ires"

.stant

ower

HAT

22. Conclusions and Summary

CAUSED THESE PHENO!v1ENA?

8. FACT: For more than seven years, regions in the ground under where the main body of WTC4 stood have continued to fume. WHY?

9. FACT: Hazy clouds, called FUZ?yblobs in this book, appeared in the vicinity of material undergoing destruction. WHY?

Copyright 2012

10. FACT: .Magnetometer readings from six stations in Alaska recorded abrupt shifts in the Earth's magnetic field as each of the major destructive events unfolded at the WTC on 9/11. WHY?

11. FACT: Many cars in the neighborhood of the \X'TC complex were flipped upside down. They couldn't have been flipped by hurricane-force "rinds, since they stood adjacent to trees with full foliage, not stripped by high wind. WHY?

12. FACT: More damage was done to the bathtub by earth-moving equipment during the clean-up process than from the destruction of more than a million tons of .buildings above it. WHY?

13. FACT: Most of the destroyed towers underwent mid-air pulverization and were

turned to dust before they hit the ground. WHAT FORCE CAUSED THIS "DDSTIFICATION"?

14. FACT: Near-instant rusting of affected steel provided evidence of molecular dissociation and transmutation. WHY?

15. FACT: Of the estimated 3,000 toilets in \TICl and WTC2, not one survived, nor was any recognizable portion of one whatsoever found. WHY?

16. FACT: Only one piece of office equipment in the entire WTC complex, a filing cabinet \vith folder dividers, survived. WHY?

17. FACT: Only the north wing of WTC4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the main body, which virtually disappeared. FACT

18. FACT: Rail lines, tunnels and most of the rail cars at levels under the WTC complex had only light damage, if any. WHY?

19. FACT: Cylindrical holes were cut into the vertical faces of buildings 4, 5 and 6. They were cut also into Liberty Street in front of Bankers Trust and into Vesey Street in front of WTC6. In addition, a cylindrical arc was cut into the fa<;ade of Bankers Trust. WHY AND HOW?

20. FACT: Scott-Paks-portable air-tanks for firemen-frequently exploded for no visible reason. Entire fire trucks themselves that were parked near the WTC

Reprinted With Permission From Dr. Judy Wood

Unauthorized Reprinting/Copying Prohibited

481

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

482

exploded. WHY? HO'X?

Where Did the Towers Go?

FACT: Sheets of plain office paper were omnipresent throughout lower Manhattan after each tower's destruction. This paper, however, remained unburned, even though it was often immediately adjacent to flaming cars or to steel beams glowing red, yellow, and even white. WHY?

FACT: Some steel beams and pieces of glass at and near GZ had what this book calls a S~iss-Cheeseappearance. WHY?

FACT: Steel columns from the towers were curled around vertical axes like ro!!ed­ up carpets. Steel columns of this kind, however, when they buckle from being overloaded, would be bent around the horizontal, not the vertical, axis. \xrHY?

FACT: The "collapse" of the towers took place with remarkably little damage to neighboring buildings. The only seriously damaged or entirely destroyed buildings, in fact, were those with the WTC prefix, only those, that is, that were a part of the WTC complex. WHY?

FACT: The destruction of WTC7 in late afternoon on 9/11 was whisper quiet. The seismic signal during its disappearance was not significantly greater than background noise. WHY?

FACT: The facades of WFC1 and WFC2 showed no apparent structural damage from the destruction of WTC1 and WTC2. However, the decorative marble fayade around the entry to the buildings was completely missing, entirely gone. WHY? FROM WHAT FORCE?

FACT: In the dirt pile, the Fuming was unusual for its quality of immediately decreasing when watered, contrary to fumes caused by fire or heat, where an initial steam-up is the response to watering. WHY?

FACT: The majority of the towers (\VTC1, WTC2, WTC3, wrC7) did not remain as rigid bodies as they "fell." WHY NOT?

FACT: The method of destruction in the case of each tower minimized damage to the bathtub and adjacent buildings, whereas terrorists would have been expected to maximize damage, including that of infrastructure.

FACT: The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the T\V1.n Towers.

FACT: The seismic impact was minimal during the destructions of \VrC1, wrC2 and WTfC7 and far too small to correspond with a conventional "collapse" as based on a comparison ,vith the IGngdome controlled demolition.

32.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38

39

40

4~

4

Copyright 2012

Reprinted With Permission From Dr. Judy Wood

Unauthorized Reprinting/Copying Prohibited

.

."

)1)

",,'

~'#~n,d;!~.

22. Conclusions and Summary

32. FACT: The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not from the bottom up.

fanhattan

led, even

lsglowing

this book

like rolled­

'Om being

WHY?

::lamage to buildings, )art of the

sper quiet.

eater than

:al damage

ve marble

rely gone.

unediately e an initial

lot remain

:lamage to

. expected

·uction of

:1, WTC2

Uapse" as

Copyright 2012

33. FACT: The Twin Towers were destroyed in a shorter time than can be explained by physics as a "collapse" even at free-fall speed.

34. FACT: The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.

35. FACT: The upper 90 percent, approximately, of the inside of WTC7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.

36. FACT: The WTC underground mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Brothers' Road Runner and friends.

37. FACT: The \TIC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the total mass of the buildings.

38. FACT: The WTC7 rubble pile was too small to account for the total mass of the building, and much of it consisted of mud.

39. FACT: Truckloads of dirt were hauled both into and out of the WTC site, a pattern that continues to this day.

40. FACT: What this book calls lather, thick clouds of dust and fumes, emanated from some faces of buildings before destruction, as if large volumes of the buildings' mass was dissolving into the air. Lather poured from WTC7 for several hours before its destruction. WHY?

41. FACT: What this book calls weird fire appeared frequently on 9/11. This "fire" flamed but gave no evidence of providing heat, not even enough to burn nearby sheets of paper. WHY?

42. FACT: Glass >.vindows on nearby buildings received circular and other odd-shaped holes without the entire panes breaking. WHY?

43. FACT: Changes and alterations in materials on 9/11 were similar or even identical in a great many ways to the changes and alterations in materials caused by The Hutchison Effect. The Hutchison Effect is known to result in material-altering phenomena of the kinds we have listed here.

c. Summary

To determine what happened on 9/11, not just some but all available evidence must be considered. \YJe cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want

Reprinted With Permission From Dr. Judy Wood

Unauthorized Reprinting/Copying Prohibited

L\'iS?'