Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Angat vs. Republic, 314 SCRA 438 Petition: review on certiorari [decision of the RTC, Marikina] Petitioner: Gerardo Angat Respondent: Republic of the Philippines Ponente: J. Vitug Date: 14 September 1999 Facts: Petitioner Gerardo Angat was a natural born citizen of the Philippines until he lost his citizenship by naturalization in the United States of America.
** 11 March 1996, filed before RTC of Marikina City, Branch 272, a petition to regain his Status as a citizen of the Philippines [under CA 63, RA 965 and RA 2630]
30 April 1996, the trial court issued a notice setting the case for initial hearing on 27 January 1997 copy received by the Office of the Solicitor General ("OSG"), 10 May 1996. 13 June 1996, Angat sought to be allowed to take his oath of allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines pursuant to R.A. 8171 motion initially denied by the trial judge, but Angat just filed another motion afterwards, and eventually the court consented. 3 October 1996, on court order, Angat took his oath of allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines [pursuant to RA 8171]
13 October 1997, Angat filed motion for reconsideration, questioned the September 1997 decision by the trial court: he asserted that his petition was filed on 14 March 1996, months before the Special Committee on Naturalization was supposedly constituted [pursuant to AO 285] the trial judge denied the motion for recon. on 29 Dec 1997. Pertinent laws/provisions/concepts: Repatriation: To restore or return to the country of birth, citizenship, or origin PD 703: designated the Special Committee on Naturalization as the proper body to process the repatriation of Filipino women who lost their Philippine citizenship by marriage to aliens, and natural born Filipinos who have lost their Philippine citizenship. Letter of Instruction No. 270 (amended by LOI 491): among others, defined which public officers constituted the Special Committee. Issues: 1. At the time the petition [to regain his Status as a citizen of the Philippines] was filed, did the RTC have jurisdiction over repatriation cases for natural-born Filipinos? Ruling:
** The day after, 4 October 1996, the trial judge issued another order stating, among others, the petitioner is hereby repatriated and declared as citizen of the Republic of the Philippines pursuant to Republic Act No. 8171. [underlining provided] ** 19 March 1997, OSG asserted that the petition itself should have been dismissed by the court a quo for lack of jurisdiction because the proper forum for it was the Special Committee on Naturalization [pursuant to AO 285, dated 22 Aug 1996] ** 22 September 1997, the trial court found merit in the OSGs assertion: xxx xxx xxx WHEREFORE, foregoing premises considered, the motion to dismiss filed by the Office of the Solicitor General is hereby granted. The orders of this Court dated September 20, 1996 and October 04, 1996 are hereby set aside and the herein petition is ordered DISMISSED on the ground of lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to its re-filing before the Special Committee on Naturalization.
Decision: the petition for review is DENIED, and the Order, dated 22 September 1996, issued by the court a quo, dismissing the petition of petitioner in Civil Case No. N-96-03-MK for want of jurisdiction, is AFFIRMED. No costs. Principles: Citizenship [repatriation of natural-born Filipinos]