Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PROCESS STEPS: Describe the process graphically, according to your policy and procedure for the activity, and number each one. If the process is complex you may want to select one process step or sub-process to work on. DIRECT ADMITS
1 MD Decision to Admit 2 Obtain Orders 3 Bed Assignment 4 Registration 5 Transport or Direction To Unit
FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS SUB-PROCESS STEPS: Graphically describe the sub-processes for each process step and then list the possible failure modes for each one If the process is complex you may want to select sub-process to work on. PROCESS: MD DECISION TO ADMIT A MD/Office Staff calls Hospital B Verification of Bed Availability C D E
Failure Modes 1. Wrong person contacted with info 2. Patient arrives without prior notice 3 4 5 6
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS SUB-PROCESS STEPS: Graphically describe the sub-processes for each process step and then list the possible failure modes for each one If the process is complex you may want to select sub-process to work on. PROCESS: OBTAIN ORDERS A MD/Office Staff phones/faxes/ gives orders to patient B C D E
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS SUB-PROCESS STEPS: Graphically describe the sub-processes for each proces step and then list the possible failure modes for each one If the process is complex you may want to select sub-process to work on. PROCESS: BED ASSIGNMENT A Determine Bed Type B Check Bed Availability C Assign Bed D E
Failure Modes 1 No bed available (high census, type, etc.) 2 Overlapping bed assignment 3 Bed not clean/bed broken 4 Late discharges 5 6
Failure Modes 1 Bed assignment person not available 2 No bed assignment made 3 Patient arrives to floor without bed assigned 4 5 6
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS SUB-PROCESS STEPS: Graphically describe the sub-processes for each proces step and then list the possible failure modes for each one If the process is complex you may want to select sub-process to work on. PROCESS: REGISTRATION A Register Patient B Enter Data Verify Accuracy of Data already in
system
D Patient ID
Failure Modes 1 System down 2 Incorrect info entered 3 Patient unable to give or verify accuracy 4 5 6
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS SUB-PROCESS STEPS: Graphically describe the sub-processes for each proces step and then list the possible failure modes for each one If the process is complex you may want to select sub-process to work on. PROCESS: TRANSPORT A Call Transport B Direct Patient to Care Area C Call unit to come & get patient D Transport to Unit E
Failure Modes 1 Patient arrives without being registered 2 Patient arrives without unit notification 3 Patient arrives and bed not ready 4 5 6
Failure Modes 1 2 3 4 5 6
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due
page 2
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due
page 3
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due
page 4
Severity: 1 = no harm; 2 = temporary harm; 3 = permanent harm; 4 = Death/Major loss of function Potential Cause(s) (why the failure could occur - list all possibilities for each failure mode and conduct analysis for all failure modes within the scope of this FMEA) Probability: 1 = remote; 2 = uncommon; 3 = occasional; 4 = frequent Current Control Measure Unit not communicated with Env. Services that patient discharged Late rounding by MD's Awaiting diagnostic reports No back-up system in place
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due
page 5
Severity: 1 = no harm; 2 = temporary harm; 3 = permanent harm; 4 = Death/Major loss of function Potential Cause(s) (why the failure could occur - list all possibilities for each failure mode and conduct analysis for all failure modes within the scope of this FMEA) Probability: 1 = remote; 2 = uncommon; 3 = occasional; 4 = frequent Current Control Measure Bed unavailable Not staff priority Lack of staff accountability/responsibility No request received Communication Failure
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due
page 6
3. System down
Severity: 1 = no harm; 2 = temporary harm; 3 = permanent harm; 4 = Death/Major loss of function Potential Cause(s) (why the failure could occur - list all possibilities for each failure mode and conduct analysis for all failure modes within the scope of this FMEA) Probability: 1 = remote; 2 = uncommon; 3 = occasional; 4 = frequent Current Control Measure
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due
page 7
Severity: 1 = no harm; 2 = temporary harm; 3 = permanent harm; 4 = Death/Major loss of function Potential Cause(s) (why the failure could occur - list all possibilities for each failure mode and conduct analysis for all failure modes within the scope of this FMEA) Probability: 1 = remote; 2 = uncommon; 3 = occasional; 4 = frequent Current Control Measure
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due
page 8
Severity: 1 = no harm; 2 = temporary harm; 3 = permanent harm; 4 = Death/Major loss of function Potential Cause(s) (why the failure could occur - list all possibilities for each failure mode and conduct analysis for all failure modes within the scope of this FMEA) Probability: 1 = remote; 2 = uncommon; 3 = occasional; 4 = frequent Current Control Measure
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due
page 9
Severity: 1 = no harm; 2 = temporary harm; 3 = permanent harm; 4 = Death/Major loss of function Potential Cause(s) (why the failure could occur - list all possibilities for each failure mode and conduct analysis for all failure modes within the scope of this FMEA) Probability: 1 = remote; 2 = uncommon; 3 = occasional; 4 = frequent Current Control Measure
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due
page 10
Severity: 1 = no harm; 2 = temporary harm; 3 = permanent harm; 4 = Death/Major loss of function Potential Cause(s) (why the failure could occur - list all possibilities for each failure mode and conduct analysis for all failure modes within the scope of this FMEA) Probability: 1 = remote; 2 = uncommon; 3 = occasional; 4 = frequent Current Control Measure
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due
page 11
Severity: 1 = no harm; 2 = temporary harm; 3 = permanent harm; 4 = Death/Major loss of function Potential Cause(s) (why the failure could occur - list all possibilities for each failure mode and conduct analysis for all failure modes within the scope of this FMEA) Probability: 1 = remote; 2 = uncommon; 3 = occasional; 4 = frequent Current Control Measure
Detectability: 1 = Very Likely; 2 = Likely; 3 = UnLikely; 4 = Very Unlikely Hazard Score (RPN = Severity x Probability x Detectablility) Decision: Proceed or Rationale for Stopping based on score or explanation Action (Eliminate, Control or Accept) Description of Intervention
Outcome Measure
Person Responsible Management Concurrence (Yes or No) Implementation Time Frame/Date Due