Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2116
PH.D.(LAW)
REGULARCRIMINALCOMPLAINTCASENO.4/2008
Ku.Pragatid/oGhanshamGajbhiye, Agedabout22years,Occ.Education, R/oAmbedkarWard,Warathi, Tah.Dist.Bhandara. ...VERSIS... 1) 2) 3) 4) Sau.Damayantiw/oDayalBansod, Agedabout50years,Occ.Household, ShriKumars/oDayalBansod, Agedabout23years,Occ.Business, ShriSachins/oDayalBansod, Agedabout28years,Occ.Business, Ku.Yogitad/oDayalBansod, Agedabout27years,Occ.Household, .. Complainant
AllR/oAmbedkarWard,Warathi, Tah.Dist.Bhandara.
..Accused ..2.
JUDGMENT (DELIVEREDONTHIS13THDECEMBER,2010)
1.
Theaccusedarefacingchargefortheoffencepunishableunder
Section323,354,r/w34oftheIndianPenalCode.
2.
Thebrieffactsoftheprosecutioncasearethatthecomplainant
no.2hasabusedherinfilthylanguageandthreatenedthathewillsenther injailandhewillsetheronfire.Theaccusedno.2hasalsoabusedherby sayingngk uojs djh jkaMhu vkgsl] ngk yksdkalkscr >ksirsl o rq uaxh] HkkslGh] dq=h] ukyk;dh vkgsl andstarted
..3..R.Cri.C.No.4/08(Judgment)
beatingheronhershoulderandotherpartsofbody.Thenaccusedno.3 camethereandhehasbeatenheronherchestandtornherclothes.Then accused no.4 came there and beaten to the complainant. At that time UjwalaBharatGajbhiye,NitaManishGajbhiye,RituWasnikandPranali Wasnikcamethere. Atabout5.00P.M.Thecomplainant withhersister Ku.Barlin went to Outpost Warathi for file complaint but police have refusedtoacceptthecomplainant,thereforeshewenttoP.St.Bhandaraand filedcomplaint.Policehavereferredherformedicalcheckupandpolice haveregisteredtheoffenceasN.C.No.746/2007underSection323,506of IndianPenalCode.Thereforethiscomplaintwasfiledbythecomplainant.
3.
Afterverificationofthecomplaint,mylearnedpredecessorhas
issuedprocessunderSection323,452r/w34oftheIndianPenalCode asperorderdated22/01/2009.
4.
AsperorderbelowExh.1dated15/06/2010afterrecordingof
..4..
5.
FollowingpointsarisesformydeterminationandIhavegiven
myfindingsthereonforthereasonsstatedbelow:
POINTS FINDINGS
1 Doestheprosecutionprovethaton9.12.2007 atabout4.00p.m.atAmbedkarWard,Warthi, the accused in furtherance of their common intentionbeatenthecomplainantandcaused hurttoherandherebycommittedanoffence punishableunder Section 323 r/w 34ofthe IndianPenalCode? Inthenegative.
POINTS
FINDINGS
2 Doestheprosecutionprovethatatthesame date,time and place, the accused in furtherance of their common intention, torn thebrawandblouseofthecomplainantwith intentiontooutragehermodestyandthereby committed an offence punishable under Section 354 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code? Inthenegative. 3 Whatorder?......... Asperfinalorder.
CW1Pragatid/oGhanshyamGajbhiyeatExh.54.Itappearsfromher
..5..R.Cri.C.No.4/08(Judgment)
evidence that on 9.12.2007 at about 4.00 p.m. she was going to throw wastewaterfromherhouse. Atthattime,accusedno.1Damayantihas thrownthewasteonherpersonandthereforeshehasthrownherwaste wateratthatplace.ThenDayalBansodcamethereandstatedhertoclean thelaneotherwisehewillsendhertoJail.Thereaftershehasstatedhimto callhiswife.ThenaccusedDamayanticametoherhouseandabusedher infilthylanguage.AccusedYogitahasstatedhertosetonfire.Thenshe hastakenalathiinherhandandstatedthemtogetridof.Thenshehad
tried and shouted ' Sodwa Sodwa'. Then the neighboring persons have gatheredthere.SimaDongreandShaliniNagdevecametorescueherand they have taken out lathi from her hand. Then everything was done peacefulfortwominutes.
7.
ShefurtherdeposedthatthenKumarcamethereandcaughther
braandtornit andbeatenherhairalsoandaccusedSachinhasstarted scufflingwithher.ThenshewenttoPoliceStation,Bhandaraandpolice haverecordedheroralcomplaint.Thepolicehavereferredherformedical checkuptoCivilSurgeon,Bhandara.TheMedicalOfficerhastreatedher and issued medical certificate. Her oral complaint is at Article A and medicalcertificateisatArticleB.PolicehaveregisteredN.C.asperExh. 55.Thereforeshehasfiledthisprivate
..6.. complaint. 8. In her cross examination she has admitted that her house is
herhouse.Shefurtheradmittedthatherneighborers ShrikantRamteke, PrashantRamteke,ManishGajbhiye,LaxmikantRamteke,SeemaDongre areresidingthere.Shefurtheradmittedthatthisquarrelendedwithinone hourandimmediatelysherushedtopolicestationtofilecomplaint.She alsoadmittedthatshehasshownthetornclothestothepolicebutthey havenotseizedit.Policehavenottakenhercomplaintalso.Shehasnot filedanycomplaintagainstthepolicetotheirhigherofficialfornottaking complaint. Shefurther admittedthatinthelandofherhousesomany peoplesarewalkingtheretogototheirhouses.Shefurtheradmittedthat forgettingthepetrolpumptheaccusedpersonshaveappliedandshehas alsoappliedbuttheaccusedwasallottedwiththepetrolpump.Witness volunteersthatshehasfiledwritpetitiontocanceltheunlawfulallotment ofthepetrolpumptotheaccusedandshehasalsoadmittedthatthiswrit petitionwasdismissed.Shefurtheradmittedthatshehasfiledcomplaint against these accused that they have started their petrol pump by encroachingthelandbefore
..7..R.Cri.C.No.4/08(Judgment)
revenueauthorityandshehasalsocalledthepressconference.Shefurther admittedthattheirlanewasusebyShrikantRamteke,PrashantRamteke,
LaxmikantRamteke,BharatGajbhiye,ManishGajbhiye,KalyanDongreto gototheirhousesandthesepeoplesareusingthiswayforcommunication.
9.
complainantandthereforeasperorderdated7/12/2010,theevidenceof complainant wasclosedandstatement ofaccusedunder Section313of Criminal Procedure Code are recorded at Exh.63 to 66 in which the accusedhave deniedtheincriminatingcircumstancesandsubmittedthat falsecaseisfiledagainstthem.
10
Heardbothsidesandgonethroughtheevidenceonrecord.The
learnedcounselforcomplainantShriBhole,Advocatesubmittedthatthe accusedKumarhascaughttheblouseandbraofthecomplainantandtorn it and also threatened the complainant and her family members tobeat them, therefore N.C.was filedbythecomplainant. He further submitted thatthoughtheotherwitnessesarenotexaminedbythecomplainant,but the evidence of complainant CW 1 is sufficient to prove the guilt of accusedbeyondreasonabledoubtandaccusedbe
..8.. convicted.
11.
Hehassubmittedthatthereisnocogentorcorroborativeevidencegiven bythecomplainantinsupportofhercase.Therearesomanywitnesses presentthereandtheyhaveseentheseoffencebutthecomplainanthasnot examinedanyofthewitnessesfromSimaDongreorShaliniNagdeveor other persons from that locality, therefore adverse inference be drawn againsttheaccusedandthecomplainanthasfiledthisfalsecomplaintonly withtheenmityofgettingpetrolpumpandthereforecomplainantfailsto prove the guilt of accused or any incriminating of the offence and thereforeaccusedbeacquitted. 13. Heardbothsidesandongoingthroughtheevidenceonrecord.It
isadmittedthattherewereseveralwitnessespresent atthetimeofthis incidentbutthecomplainantfailstoshow whythecomplainanthasnot examinedanyofthewitnessinsupportofherevidence.Thecomplainant herselfhasstatedthatoneSimaDongreandShaliniNagdevehasrescued herandtheytakenoutlathifromherhandbuttheyarenotexaminedbythe complainant. In her cross examination, she has admitted that she has appliedforgettingpetrolpumpandaccusedhavealsoappliedforgetting petrol pump, out of which accused have been allotted with the petrol pump.Thecomplainanthasalsoadmittedthat
..9..R.Cri.C.No.4/08(Judgment)
she has filed writ petition to the Honourable High Court but it was dismissed.Shehasalsofiledcomplainttorevenueauthorityandalsotaken thepressconferenceonthesamesubject.Fromtheevidenceonrecord,it appearsthatthecomplainanthasexaminedonlyherselfbeforetheCourt and there is no corroborative or supporting evidence given by her in supportofhercase.Hence,itisheldthatthecomplainantfailstoprovethe guiltofaccusedandalsofailstoproveanyoftheingredientsoftheoffence under Section 323,354 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code beyond the reasonabledoubtandundersuchcircumstancestheaccusedaccusedare entitled for their acquittal. Hence, I answer point no.1 and 2 in the negative.
14.
ASTOPOINTNO.3:Inviewofmyfindingtoabovepoints,I
Dayal Bansod (3) Shri Sachin Dayal Bansod and (4) Ku.Yogita Dayal
Bansod are is hereby acquitted under Section 248(1) of the Code of CriminalProcedure,1973fortheoffencepunishableunderSection323,354 r/w34oftheIndianPenalCode,1860.
..10..
(2)
Thebailbondsoftheaccusedstandcancelled.
Date:13.12.2010.