The 2010 Racial and Gender Report Card: College Sport

MediaContact:KelvinAng
315.450.1420,kelvinangjy@knights.ucf.edu
The2010RacialandGenderReportCard:
CollegeSport
byRichardLapchick
withBrianHoffandChristopherKaiser
EXECUTIVESUMMARY
Orlando,FLMarch3,2011The2010CollegeRacialandGenderReportCard,issuedtodaybyThe
InstituteforDiversityandEthicsinSport(TIDES)attheUniversityofCentralFlorida,showedthatcollege
sportincreaseditsgradeforracialhiringpracticesfromaC+toaBwhilemaintainingasolidBfor
genderhiringpractices.ThecombinedgradewasasolidB.
CollegesportreceivedtheBforracialhiringpracticesbyearning81.9points,upfrom76.2pointsinthe
2008CollegeRGRC,thelastreportwhereagradewasissued.CollegesportreceivedtheBforgender
hiringpracticesbyearning82.3points,upfrom80.7pointsinthe2008CollegeRGRC.Thecombined
gradewasraisedfromaC+(78.5)toaB(82.1).The2009CollegeRGRCdidnotincludegradesbecause
therewasinsufficientnewdatatoupdatethe2008CollegeRGRC.
Collegesportmadeasubstantialimprovementonracialhiringpracticesaswellasprogressongender
hiringpractices.Therehavebeenwellpublicizedimprovementsinheadfootballcoachingpositions,but
thisRGRCalsoshowsimprovementacrosstheboardforbothraceandgender.
However,thereportfeaturedseveralbigareasofconcern.Historically,therehasbeenanoutstanding
recordforequalopportunityformensheadbasketballcoaches.NowinmensDivisionIbasketball,21.0
percentofallheadcoacheswereAfricanAmerican,whichwasdown1.9percentagepointsfromthelast
reportanddown4.2percentagepointsfromthe200506season,whentherewasanalltimehighof
25.2percentofourmensheadbasketballcoacheswhowereAfricanAmerican.
Also,allourconferencecommissionersatFBSconferencesarewhitemen.Finally,only8.3percentof
DivisionIathleticsdirectorsarewomen.CollegesportreceiveditsonlyFsinthesecategories.
Thereport,whichwasauthoredbyTIDESdirectorRichardLapchickwithBrianHoffandChrisKaiser,
followspreviouslyreleasedonesonMajorLeagueBaseball,theNationalBasketballAssociation,the
WomensNationalBasketballAssociation,theNationalFootballLeagueandMajorLeagueSoccer.The
CollegeSportreportwillbefollowedbythecompleteRacialandGenderReportCard.
RICHARDE.LAPCHICK,DIRECTORKEITHHARRISON,ASSOCIATEDIRECTORFITZHILL,VISITINGSCHOLAR
Tel:4078231516or4078234887Fax:4078233771Web:www.tidesport.org
~MAKINGWAVESOFCHANGE~
2|P a g e
2010RGRC:CollegeSport
Everyotheryear,theNCAAreleasesanewNCAARaceandGenderDemographicsofNCAAMember
ConferencesPersonnelReportandNCAARaceandGenderDemographicsofNCAAMemberInstitutions
AthleticPersonnel.ThesereportsareusedtoexaminetheracialandgenderdemographicsofNCAA
headandassistantcoaches,athleticsdirectorsacrossalldivisions,associateandassistantathletic
directors,seniorwomanadministrators,academicadvisors,compliancecoordinatorsandmanagersfor
businessdevelopment,fundraising,facilities,marketing,ticketsalesandmediarelations,aswellasan
arrayofassistantsandsupportstaff.
Thisreportcardalsofeaturesupdatestothesectionsregardingracialandgenderdemographicsof
officialsattheNCAAHeadquarters,theuniversitypresidents,athleticsdirectors,headfootballcoaches,
footballcoordinatorsandfacultyathleticrepresentativesatthe120institutionsintheDivisionIFootball
BowlSubdivision(FBS),conferencecommissionersandNCAAstudentathletes.Thedatautilizedto
updatethesesectionswasculledfromseveralsources,includingtheNCAAissued20092010NCAA
StudentAthleteEthnicityReport,the20092010DivisionICampusLeadershipStudypublishedbyTIDES
inNovember2010,selfreporteddemographicdataonNCAAHeadquarterspersonnelforthefiscalyear
20092010andinformationcontainedinpreviousstudiesbyTIDES.Inallcasesregardingemploymentin
collegeathletics,thedatareportedthroughoutthe2010RacialandGenderReportCardexcludes
HistoricallyBlackCollegesandUniversities(HBCUs).
TablesfortheReportareincludedinAppendixI.
TheInstituteforDiversityandEthicsinSport(TIDES)attheUniversityofCentralFloridapublishesthe
RacialandGenderReportCardtoindicateareasofimprovement,stagnationandregressionintheracial
andgendercompositionofprofessionalandcollegesportspersonnelandtocontributetothe
improvementofintegrationinfrontofficeandcollegeathleticsdepartmentpositions.
Itisimperativethatsportsteamsplaythebestathletestheyhaveavailabletowingames.TIDESstrives
toemphasizethevalueofdiversitytoathleticdepartmentswhentheychoosetheirteamonthecourt
andinthedepartment.Diversityinitiativessuchasdiversitymanagementtrainingcanhelpchange
attitudesandincreasetheapplicantpoolforopenpositions.Itisclearlythechoiceoftheinstitution
regardingwhichapplicantisthebestfitforitsdepartment,butTIDESwantstoillustratehowimportant
itistohaveadiverseorganizationinvolvingindividualswhohappentobeofadifferentraceorgender.
Thiselementofdiversitycanprovideadifferentperspective,andpossiblyacompetitiveadvantagefora
winintheboardroomaswellasontheathleticfieldsofplay.
3|P a g e
REPORTHIGHLIGHTSFOR2010
UniversityLeadershipPositionsatFootballBowlSubdivisionInstitutions
PositivegainsweremadebyAfricanAmericansintheroleofuniversitypresidentatthe120FBS
Institutions.TherearenowfiveAfricanAmericans,representinga0.8percentagepointincrease.
92.5percentofFBSuniversitypresidentswerewhite,whilethereweretwoAsianpresidents(0.8
percentagepointincrease)andtwoLatinopresidents(0.8percentagepointdecrease).However,there
werenoNativeAmericanuniversitypresidents.
ThelevelofdiversitywithintheathleticdirectorpositionatFBSschoolsdeclinedfromlastyears
study,as14(11.7percent)peopleofcolorholdthisposition.However,thistotaldoesnotincludeany
womenofcolor.
WiththeadditionofsixnewAfricanAmericanheadcoachesatFBSschoolsbeforethe2010season
(CharlieStrong,UniversityofLouisville;JokerPhillips,UniversityofKentucky;MikeLondon,University
ofVirginia;RuffinMcNeill,EastCarolinaUniversity;LarryPorter,UniversityofMemphis;WillieTaggart,
WesternKentuckyUniversity),theoverallnumberofAfricanAmericanheadcoachesfrom2008
increasedfromsevento13.Thispastoffseason,thehiringofJonEmbreeatColorado,DarrellHazellat
KentState,DonTreadwellatMiami(Ohio),DavidShawatStanfordandJamesFranklinatVanderbilt,
coupledwiththedismissalofRandyShannonatMiami(FL)andMikeHaywoodatPittsburgh,brought
thenumberofAfricanAmericanheadcoachesto16.
The18coachesofcolorwhowillstartthe2011seasonrepresentsthehighestnumberandpercentage
ofcoachesofcoloreveratFBSschools.ThisincludedcoachesintheACC,SEC,BigEast,Big12andPac
10.
Ofthe266offensiveanddefensivecoordinatorsintheFBS,therewerethreemoreAfricanAmerican
coordinatorsfromlastyearstotalof30.
NCAAHeadquarters
AtthehighlevelsoftheNCAAheadquartersintheEVP/SVP/VPpositions,thenumberofpeopleof
colorincreasedbyonetofour,whilewomendecreasedbyonetothree.AfricanAmericanscontinue
tobetheonlypeopleofcolorrepresentedattheEVP/SVP/VPleveloccupying25percent(up1.5
percentagepoints)ofthepositions.Whitesheldtheremaining75percentofthepositions.
Whilethenumberofpeopleofcolorremainedthesameinpositionsatthemanaging
director/directorlevel,thepercentagedecreasedslightlyby0.4percentagepointsto23.9percent.
Womenheld45.1percentofthepositionsatthemanagingdirector/directorlevel,anincreaseof3.7
percentagepoints.
Note:ThenumberofLatinosremainedthesameinthesepositions.ThenumberofAsiansincreased
fromonetotwoasaresultofachangeinreportingforanindividualwhowaspreviouslyreportedas
NativeHawaiianPacificIslanderbutisnowreflectedasAsianinourreporting.
4|P a g e
Attheadministratorlevel,thepercentageofpeopleofcolordecreasedduetoadropinthenumberof
minoritiesbyfive.ThepercentageofAfricanAmericansdecreasedto16.2percent(down1.8percentage
points)whileLatinorepresentationroseslightlyto2.1percent(up0.1percentagepoints).Asian
representationincreasedto2.6percent(up0.6percentagepoints).ThenumberofwhiteNCAA
administratorsdecreasedbynine.Thepercentageofwhiteadministratorsinthesepositions,however,
increasedby1.1percentagepointsto79.1percent.Althoughthenumberofwomeninadministrative
positionsdecreasedbyfiveto104,onapercentagepointbasistheyincreasedby1.3to54.5percent.
Withinthesupportstaffpositionlevelattheheadquarters,whichincludesalllevelsofassistants,the
percentageofpeopleofcolorincreased0.2percentagepointsto19.2percent,whilewomendecreased
1.7percentagepointsto93.3percent.Thisdropoccurredafterthepercentageofwomenatthesupport
levelwasatitshighestrecordedlevellastyearsincetheNCAAbeganreportingdemographicdatain
1998.
ConferenceCommissioners
Onceagain,100percentofthe11FootballBowlSubdivision(FBS),formerlyknownasDivisionIA,
conferencecommissionerswerewhitemen.
InallofDivisionI,excludingtheHistoricallyBlackconferences,all30(100percent)ofDivisionI
conferencecommissionerswerewhite.Fivewereledbywhitewomen,accountingfor16.7percentof
thecommissioners.
IntermsofassociatecommissionerrolesattheFBSlevel,thereare18womenoccupyingtheseposts.
Studentathletes
InDivisionIfootball,AfricanAmericansaccountfor45.8percentoftheathletesandwhiteshold45.1
percent,indicatingthelevelsofparticipationbetweenthesetworacescontinuetoremainveryclose.
InDivisionIbasketball,AfricanAmericansaccountfor60.9percentoftheathletesandwhiteshold
30.5percent.
AfricanAmericanfemalestudentathletesaccountedfor51percentoftheDivisionIbasketball
participants,representinga0.5percentagepointdecreasefromlastyear.
InDivisionIsoftball,Latinassawa0.1percentagepointincreaseto7.4percent,continuingthetrend
ofincreasedparticipationbythisdemographicineveryyearsince200102.
Peopleofcolorhad22.5percentofthesoftballpositionswhilehavingonly16.6percentofthemens
baseballpositions.
ThepercentageofwhitemaleathletesinallDivisionIstandsat62.5percent,whichisadecreaseof
1.3percentagepoints.OfallDivisionImaleathletes,24.9percentareAfricanAmerican,representing
anincreaseof0.1percentagepointsfromlastyearstotal.
5|P a g e
ThepercentageofwhitemalestudentathletesattheDivisionI,IIandIIIcombinedwere70.4percent,
18.7percentforAfricanAmericanmales,4.3percentforLatinos,1.5percentforAsianmenand0.3
percentforAmericanIndian/AlaskanNativesmales.
ThepercentageofwhitefemalestudentathletesattheDivisionI,IIandIIIcombinedwere77.2
percent,11.6percentforAfricanAmericanfemales,4.0percentforLatinas,1.5percentforAsian
femalesand0.3percentforAmericanIndian/AlaskanNativefemales.
Coaching
Whitesdominatetheheadcoachingranksonmensteamsholding89.3percent,89.2percentand
92.3percentofallheadcoachingpositionsinDivisionsI,IIandIII,respectively.
AfricanAmericansheld6.6percent,4.8percentand3.7percentofthemensheadcoachingpositions
inthethreeNCAAdivisions,respectively.
Likewiseonthewomensteams,whitesheld87.7percent,89.5percentand91.9percentofallhead
coachingpositionsinDivisionsI,IIandIII,respectively.
AfricanAmericansheld7.2percent,4.8percent,and3.9percentofthewomensheadcoaching
positionsinthethreeNCAAdivisions,respectively.
InmensDivisionIbasketball,21.0percentofallheadcoacheswereAfricanAmerican,whichwas
down1.9percentagepointsfromlastreportanddown4.2percentagepointsfromthe200506
season,whentherewasanalltimehighof25.2percentofmensheadbasketballcoacheswhowere
AfricanAmerican.ThisisabigareaofconcernintheRGRC.
Only5.5percentofDivisionIheadbaseballcoacheswerepeopleofcolor,with2.6percentLatinoand
only1.1percentAfricanAmerican.
Infact,AfricanAmericansweresounderrepresentedasheadcoaches,thatonceagain,thepercentof
womencoachingmensteamsactuallyexceededthatofAfricanAmericansinDivisionIII(4.6percent
versus3.7percent.)InDivisionII,thepercentageofwomencoachingmensteamswassimilarlylowto
thepercentageofAfricanAmericans(3.5percentversus4.8percent).
MorethanthreeandahalfdecadesafterthepassageofTitleIX,womencoachingwomensteamsstill
donotrepresentthemajorityofcoachesinthewomensgame.Inaddition,thisyearsnumbersshow
noprogressinwomencoachingwomenssportsinmostsports.WomenheadcoachesinDivisionI
basketballincreasedslightly(65.9percentin200910and64.7percentin200708).Headcoachesof
DivisionITrack/CrossCountry,whichcombinestheheadcoachesofCrossCountry,IndoorTrackand
OutdoorTrack,sawaslightdecreaseinfemaleheadcoachesfrom20.2percentin200708to19.7
percentin200910.Inallothersports,menled55.5percentofthewomensteamswhilewomenwere
headcoachesinonly45.5percentoftheprograms.
AfricanAmericanwomenheld11.4percentandAfricanAmericanmenheld3.9percentofwomens
headcoachingpositionsinDivisionIbasketballforacombinedpercentageof15.3percent(upfrom
6|P a g e
13.6percent).Nonetheless,the13.6percentstoodinstarkcontrasttothe51.5percentofthe
studentathletesplayingwomensbasketballwhowereAfricanAmerican.
Onthemensteamsin200910,whitesheld76.8,79.5,and87.3percentoftheassistantcoaching
positionsinthethreedivisions,respectively,whichwasslightlyimprovedfrom76.9,79.0,and88.1
percentrespectivelyin2008.In200910,AfricanAmericansheld18.1,13.3,and8.1percent,
respectively.
Amongthewomensteamsin200910,whitesheld78.8,81.8,and88.9percentoftheassistant
coachingpositionsinDivisionsI,IIandIII,respectively,whichwascomparabletothe79.1,81.2and
88.8percentrespectivelyin200708.In200910AfricanAmericanshad14.2,9.7,and5.9percent
respectively.In200708AfricanAmericanheld13.5,10.3and6.4percentoftheassistantcoaching
jobsonwomensteamsintherespectiveDivisions.
ThepercentageofwomenassistantsonwomensteamsdeclinedinDivisionIandDivisionIIIandsawa
slightincreaseattheDivisionIIlevel.Asassistants,womenin200910held49.0percentofthe
positionsinDivisionI,49.7percentinDivisionIIand49.3percentinDivisionIII.
AthleticsDirectors
Whitesheldtheoverwhelmingpercentageofpositionsofathleticsdirectorsinallthreedivisionsat
88.8,92.7,and96.2percentinDivisionsI,IIandIII,respectively.Thiscomparedto90.0,92.0and97.0
percentin200708respectively.
AfricanAmericansheld7.4,3.1and2.2percentrespectivelyinDivisionsI,IIandIII.Thiscomparedto
7.2percent,3.8percentand1.8percentin2006respectively.
Latinosaccountedfor2.2,3.1,and0.4percentoftheADsatDivisionI,IIandIII.Thiscomparedto1.9,
3.0and0.0percentin2008respectively.
Asiansaccountedfor0.0,0.8,and0.6percentoftheADsatDivisionI,IIandIIIandNativeAmericans
accountedfor0.9,0.0,and0.2percentoftheADsateachlevel.
WomenlostgroundasathleticsdirectorsinDivisionsIIandgainedgroundinDivisionsIandIIIsince
thelastReportCardin2008.AttheDivisionIIlevel,thepercentageoffemaleathleticdirectors
droppedslightlyby0.1percentagepointsto15.5percent.Incontrast,thepercentageoffemale
athleticdirectorsincreasedto8.3percent(up0.5percentagepoints)and27.4percent(up0.3
percentagepoints)inDivisionIandDivisionIIIrespectively.
CollegeAssociateandAssistantAthleticDirectors
Attheassociateathleticdirectorposition,whitescomprised88.5,82.8,and92.6percentofthetotal
populationatDivisionI,IIandIIIrespectively.Thesenumberswerealllowerthanthatof200708
(89.2,88.8and96.4percentrespectively).AfricanAmericansheld8.2,14.4,and5.4percentofthe
positionsateachlevel.Latinosheld1.8percent,1.0percentand0.4percentofthepositionsateach
level.Asiansheld0.7percentand1.0percentinDivisionsIandII.TherewerenoAsiansinDivisionIII
7|P a g e
inthispositionandnoNativeAmericansinDivisionsIIandIII.InDivisionI,NativeAmericanshad0.3
percentoftheassociateathleticdirectorpositions.
Thepercentageofwomenfillingassociateathleticdirectorpositionswas31.1percentinDivisionI,
42.0percentinDivisionIIand46.1percentinDivisionIII.
Womenheld100percentoftheSeniorWomanAdministratorjobsinDivisionI,IIandIII.White
womencontinuedtodominatetheSWApositionholding85.1,81.1,and93.7percentinDivisionI,II
andIII,respectively.AfricanAmericanwomenrepresented10.1,15.4and4.2percentateach
respectivelevel.
WhitescontinuetofillthemajorityoftheFARpositionswith84.4,86.4and94.2percentinDivisionsI,
IIandIII,respectively.
OVERALLGRADES
CollegesportincreaseditsgradeforracialhiringpracticesfromaC+toaBinthe2010Racialand
GenderReportCard:CollegeSportwhilemaintainingasolidBforgenderhiringpractices.The
combinedgradewasasolidB.
CollegesportreceivedtheBforracialhiringpracticesbyearning81.9points,upfrom76.2pointsinthe
2008CollegeRGRC,thelastreportwhereagradewasissued.CollegesportreceivedtheBforgender
hiringpracticesbyearning82.3points,upfrom80.7pointsinthe2008CollegeRGRC.Thecombined
gradewasraisedfromaC+(78.5)toaB(82.1).
Forracialhiringpractices,therewasanAonlyfortheNCAAHeadquarters;therewereAsforhead
mensbasketballcoaches,assistantmenscoaches,andassistantwomenscoaches(A/B+);therewere
B+sforprofessionaladministrationinathleticdepartmentsandheadwomensbasketballcoaches
(B+/B).TherewasaC+/Bforathleticdirectorsandassistantathleticdirectors.TherewasanA+for
studentathleteopportunities.TherewereFsforconferencecommissioners.
Forgenderhiringpractices,therewasanA+forheadcoachesforwomensbasketballteams,assistant
coachesforallwomensteamsandseniorwomensadministratorsandanAfortheNCAAHeadquarters
andforprofessionaladministrationinathleticdepartments.TherewasanA/A+forstudentathlete
opportunities.TherewereFsforathleticsdirectorsandconferencecommissioners.
TheNCAAreceivedanA+forDiversityInitiatives.
THEREPORTBYCATEGORY
UniversityLeadershipPositionsatFootballBowlSubdivision(FBS)Institutions
ThekeyleadershippositionsatFootballBowlSubdivision(FBS)schoolsandconferencesremained
overwhelminglywhiteandmaleeventhoughtherewasarecordnumberof15headcoachesofcolorin
8|P a g e
the2010collegefootballseasonattheFBSschools(formerlyDivisionIA)accordingtoastudyreleased
inNovember2010byTheInstitute.Thisstudy,titledTheBuckStopsHere:AssessingDiversityamong
CampusandConferenceLeadersforFootballBowlSubdivision(FBS)Schoolsinthe201011Academic
Year,reportedontheracialandgenderdemographicsandtrendsatthe120FBSinstitutions.Highlights
ofthisstudyconcerningtheleadershipofuniversitypresidents,athleticdirectors,footballcoachingstaff
andfacultyathleticrepresentativesareincludedandanalyzedwithinthissection.
NCAAHeadquarters
ThedatainthissectionontheNCAAheadquarterswassuppliedbytheNCAAfor2010andiscompared
totheirdatafrom2009.
ThroughouthistenureasNCAAPresident,thelateMylesBrandstronglyexpressedhissupportof
creatingopportunitiesforwomenandpeopleofcolorwithintheNCAAheadquartersandatthe
memberinstitutionsthatcomprisetheNCAA.InhisStateoftheNCAAaddressinJanuary2008,Brand
stated,Womencontinuetobeunderrepresentedintermsofgrantsinaidforstudentathletes,
coachingopportunitiesforwomenssportsandleadershippositionsintermsofathleticsdirector
positions.Athleticsscholarships,coachingpositionsandathleticsdirectorshipsmust,ofcourse,be
allocatedonthebasesoftalentandhardwork.Butitissimplyincredulousthatthetalentpoolisso
weightedtowardmentoproducethisimbalance.Thefacts,aswellasthehistoryofpastlackoffemale
representation,pointtoacontinuingproblemofinjustice.HealsosaidthatthelackofAfrican
Americanheadfootballcoachesisanembarrassmenttoallofintercollegiateathleticsandthatthe
talentpoolexistsanditcontainsmenwhoarereadyandabletosuccessfullyleadtheseteams,butwe
areyettoseemorethaneightheadcoachesamongthe119teamsintheFootballBowlSubdivision.And
asbadasthatis,itisworseintheFootballChampionshipSubdivisionandinDivisionsIIandIII.Dr.
BrandhelpedsetthestageforthelargepositivechangesinFBSheadcoachesafterthe2009season.
AtthehighlevelsoftheNCAAheadquartersintheEVP/SVP/VPpositions,thenumberofpeopleofcolor
increasedbyonetofour,whilewomendecreasedbyonetothree.AfricanAmericanscontinuetobe
theonlypeopleofcolorrepresentedattheEVP/SVP/VPleveloccupying25percent(up1.5percentage
points)ofthepositions.Whitesheldtheremaining75percentofthepositions.
Whilethepercentagesdecreasedslightly(down0.4percentagepoints)forpeopleofcolorwhohold
postsatthemanagingdirector/directorlevel,theactualnumberofpeopleofcolorinthesepositions
remainedthesame.Peopleofcolorrepresent23.9percentofthemanagingdirectors/directors.
Womenrepresent45.1percentofthemanagingdirectors/directors.Thisrepresentsanincreaseof3.7
percentagepoints.Whitesoccupied76.1percentofthepositionswhileAfricanAmericansheld16.9
percent(down0.2percentagepoints)ofthemanagingdirector/directorpositions.
Note:ThenumberofLatinosremainedthesameinthesepositions.ThenumberofAsiansincreased
fromonetotwoasaresultofachangeinreportingforanindividualwhowaspreviouslyreportedas
NativeHawaiianPacificIslanderbutisnowreflectedasAsianinourreporting.
AttheNCAAadministratorlevel,thepercentageofpeopleofcolordecreasedduetoadropinthe
numberofminoritiesbyfive.ThepercentageofAfricanAmericansdecreasedto16.2percent(down1.8
percentagepoints)whileLatinorepresentationroseslightlyto2.1percent(up0.1percentagepoint).
Asianrepresentationincreasedto2.6percent(up0.6percentagepoints).ThenumberofwhiteNCAA
9|P a g e
Administratorsdecreasedbynine.Thepercentageofwhiteadministratorsinthesepositions,however,
increasedby1.1percentagepointsto79.1percent.Thenumberofwomeninadministratorpositions
decreasedbyfiveto104.However,onapercentagepointbasis,theyincreasedby1.3to54.5percent.
Withinthesupportstaffpositionlevelattheheadquarters,whichincludesalllevelsofassistants,the
percentageofpeopleofcolorincreased0.2percentagepointsto19.2percent,whilewomendecreased
1.7percentagepointsto93.3percent.Thisdropoccurredafterthepercentageofwomenatthesupport
levelwasatitshighestrecordedlevellastyearsincetheNCAAbeganreportingdemographicdatain
1998.
Whenexaminingthecompositeoutlookofthesenumbers,thetotalnumberoffulltimeNCAA
employeesatthetimeofthisreportingequals399,fifteenlessthanthe414in2009.Thepercentageof
femalerepresentationisupby0.8percentagepointsto62.9percent.However,theminority
representationisdownslightly,asthepercentageofpeopleofcoloris21.1percent,(down0.1
percentagepoints).ThesenumbersareaccurateasofSeptember1,2010.Itshouldbenotedthatthese
numbersareasnapshotintimefortheNCAA.Asaresultthereissomefluctuationthatoccursbased
uponthetimeofwhenstaffarestartingordeparting.Forconsistencyinthegradingofourreportsyear
toyear,alldataregardingtheNCAAofficesistakenfromSeptember1.
CharlotteWesterhauscontinuedinherroleasthevicepresidentfortheOfficeofDiversityand
Inclusion,havingworkedcloselywiththelateNCAApresidentMylesBrandonidentifyingwaysinwhich
theNCAAcanbetterassistuniversitiesinthehiringofwomenandpeopleofcolorintoleadership
positions.
ThefourAfricanAmericanvicepresidentswere:
BernardFranklin,sr.vicepresidentforGovernanceandMembership
RobertVowels,vicepresidentforEducationServices
CharlotteWesterhaus,vicepresidentforDiversityandInclusion
BobWilliams,vicepresidentofcommunications
Thethreewomenvicepresidentswere:
CharlotteWesterhaus,vicePresidentforDiversityandInclusion
SueDonohoe,vicepresidentofWomensDivisionIBasketball
JoniComstock,vicepresidentforNCAAChampionships
GradeforNCAAHeadquarters:
Race:
A
Gender:
A
SeeTables1,2,3,4and5.
UniversityPresidentsatFBSInstitutions
AnalyzingtheleadershipatthetopofthecollegesanduniversitiesleadingFBSinstitutions,onecan
clearlyseethereisalackofdiversity.
10|P a g e
Amongthe120FBSInstitutions,111(92.5percent)presidentswerewhite.Therewereninepresidents
ofcolorand22womenservingaspresidentasofOctober2010.Thisnumberoffemalepresidents
remainedthesamefrom2009,whilethenumberofpresidentsofcolorincreasedbyoneoverthissame
timeperiod.
Therewerefive(4.2percent)AfricanAmericanpresidents
o GeorgeE.Ross,CentralMichiganUniversity
o SidneyMcPhee,MiddleTennesseeStateUniversity
o RoderickMcDavis,OhioUniversity
o ElsonS.Floyd,WashingtonStateUniversity
o BernadetteGrayLittle,UniversityofKansas
Thereweretwo(1.7percent)Latinopresidents
o LuisProenza,UniversityofAkron
o FranceA.Cordova,PurdueUniversity
Therewastwo(1.7percent)Asianpresidents
o RenuKhator,UniversityofHouston
o WallaceD.Loh,UniversityofMaryland,CollegePark
TherewerenoNativeAmericanspresidents
Therewere22(18.3percent)womenpresidents
o CarolGarrison,UniversityofAlabamaatBirmingham
o JoAnnM.Gora,BallStateUniversity
o CarolA.Cartwright,BowlingGreenStateUniversity
o SusanW.Martin,EasternMichiganUniversity
o MaryJaneSaunders,FloridaAtlanticUniversity
o M.R.C.Greenwood,UniversityofHawaii,Manoa
o RenuKhator,UniversityofHouston(Asian)
o SallyMason,UniversityofIowa
o BernadetteGrayLittle,UniversityofKansas(AfricanAmerican)
o ShirleyRaines,UniversityofMemphis
o DonnaE.Shalala,UniversityofMiami(Florida)
o MarySueColeman,UniversityofMichigan
o LouAnnaKimseySimon,MichiganStateUniversity
o BarbaraCouture,NewMexicoStateUniversity
o FranceA.Cordova,PurdueUniversity(Latina)
o JudyGenshaft,UniversityofSouthFlorida
o MarthaDunaginSaunders,UniversityofSouthernMississippi
o NancyCantor,SyracuseUniversity
o AnnWeaverHart,TempleUniversity
o DianaS.Natalicio,UniversityofTexasatElPaso
o TeresaA.Sullivan,UniversityofVirginia
o BiddyMartin,UniversityofWisconsin,Madison
+Gradeforpresidents:
Race:
F
Gender:
F
+notcalculatedinfinalgrade
11|P a g e
ConferenceCommissioners
Onceagain,100percentofthe11FootballBowlSubdivision(FBS),formerlyknownasDivisionIA,
conferencecommissionerswerewhitemen.Beingaconferencecommissionerisapowerfulposition
andthosethatheadBCSConferencesareconsideredtobeamongthemostpowerfulandinfluential
peopleincollegesport.Therewereafewopportunitiesforminoritiesandwomenattheassociate
commissionerposition.Atthetimeofthispublication,therewere52AssociateCommissionersatFBS
schools,withwomenoccupying18positions,or35percent.Peopleofcolormadeupjustfewerthan14
percentofavailablepositionsattheassociatecommissionerlevel.Theinformationinthissectionwas
collectedbyTIDESfromtheconferencesandnotfromNCAAreports.
InallofDivisionI,excludingtheHistoricallyBlackconferences,all30of30(100percent)DivisionI
conferencecommissionerswerewhite.Fiveconferenceswereledbywomenascommissioners,
accountingfor17percent.Allfivefemalecommissionershavebeenattheircurrentrespectivepositions
formorethanayear.
TheRGRCbreaksdownthefemaleconferencecommissionersasfollows:
TherewerefivewomenthatheadedDivisionIconferences:
BernadetteV.McGlade,Atlantic10Conference
CarolynSchlieFemovich,PatriotLeague
RobinHarris,IvyLeague
BethDeBauche,OhioValleyConference
NoreenMorris,NortheastConference
TherewereeighteenwomenwhoheldassociatecommissionerpositionsattheFBSlevel:
NoraLynnFinch,AtlanticCoastConference
AmyYakola,AtlanticCoastConference
DruHancock,BigXIIConference
DonnaDeMarco,BigEastConference
DanielleDonehew,BigEastConference
WendyFallen,BigTenConference
JenniferHeppel,BigTenConference
AndreaWilliams,BigTenConference
JudyMacLeod,ConferenceUSA
KellyCarney,ConferenceUSA
DonyaleCanada,MidAmericanConference
CarrieColl,MountainWestConference
CarolayneHenry,MountainWestConference
ChrstineHoyles,Pacific10Conference
ChrisDawson,Pacific10Conference
DebbieCorum,SoutheasternConference
KathyKeene,SunbeltConference
ConnieHulburt,WesternAthleticConference
12|P a g e
GradeforDivisionIConferenceCommissioners:
Race:
F
Gender:
F
SeeTables6and7.
Studentathletes
TherewereseveralchangesindatacategorizationsmadebyboththeNCAAandTheInstitutefor
DiversityandEthicsinSportthatareessentialtobeawareofbeforehighlightingstatisticalobservations
forthepasttwoyearscomparedtodatapreviouslyrecorded:
Beginningin200607andcontinuinggoingforward,tableswereaddedtotheNCAA
StudentathleteEthnicityReportdetailingtheresidentalienstatusofthestudentathletes
separatelyfromtheirrace/ethnicity.Previously,thesecategorieswerecombined,butnow
havebeenseparatedforgreateraccuracyinreporting.Therefore,becauseoftheremovalof
residentalienasachoiceamongethniccategories,theotherethnicitieswillincrease
accordingly.Studentathleteswhoseethnicitieswerepreviouslyidentifiedasnonresident
alienarenowidentifiedwithanethniccategoryandthenidentifiedseparatelyas
nonresidentaliens.Thisisparticularlyrelevantincertainsportssuchastennisandice
hockeywhicheachhaveover20percentoftotalparticipantsidentifiedashaving
nonresidentalienstatus.Sosomeincreasesinethnicpercentagesfromearlieryearscanbe
attributedtothischangeinmethodology.
Eachyear,theRacialandGenderReportCardtakesalookatthreeDivisionIsportsand
highlightstrendsforbothmaleandfemaleathletes.Forthemaleathletes,thesesportsare
basketball,footballandbaseball.Forthefemaleathletes,achangewasmadethisyearto
makethissnapshotpicturemorecomparabletothesportschosenforthemen.Inthepast,
thethreesportschosenforfemaleathleteswerebasketball,crosscountryandtrack
combined,andacategoryknownasallothersports.Withfemaleathleteparticipation
numberscontinuingtoincreaseacrosstheboard,therewaslessneedtocombinesportsfor
alargeobservationsample.Beginningwiththisyear,thethreefemalesportsforthe
DivisionIobservationswillbebasketball,outdoortrackandsoftball,sportswithbothstrong
participationlevelsandcomparativelyhighmediaattentioninrelationtootherfemale
sports.
Inbasketball,thepercentageofAfricanAmericansincreasedby0.5percentagepointsto60.9.Latino
representationshowedadecreaseof0.2percentagepointsto1.9percent.Asiansincreasedby0.1
percentagepointsto0.6percent,whilewhiteparticipationdecreased1.4percentagepointsto30.5
percent.TheTwoorMoreRacescategoryshowedanincreaseof0.5percentagepointsto1.2percent,
whiletheothercategorynowrepresents4.6percent(up0.3percentagepoints)ofDivisionI
basketballplayers.
Infootball,a0.2percentagepointincreaseforAfricanAmericanstookplaceto45.8percentofthe
population.Whitesdecreased1.2percentagepointsto45.1percent;thiscontinuedtoshowthatthe
levelsofparticipationbetweentheseAfricanAmericansandWhitescontinuetobeveryclose.
13|P a g e
Inbaseball,therewasnopercentageshiftgreaterthan0.5percentagepoints(whitedecreasedfrom
83.9percentto83.4percent).Latinoparticipationremainedconstantat5.8percent,whichtiedanall
timehighforparticipationpercentagesinceitbeganbeingrecordedin200001.
Ofthethreewomenssportsusedforthisstudy,basketballsawthemostnotableshiftsoverthelast
year.AfricanAmericanstudentathletesaccountfor51.0percentoftheDivisionIbasketball
participants,representinga0.5percentagepointdecreasefromlastyear.Whiteparticipationdecreased
0.9pointsto40.2percent,Latinasfell0.1percentagepointsto1.5percent,Asianparticipationrose0.5
percentagepoints,andAmericanIndian/AlaskanNativesremainedconstantat0.3percent.
Inoutdoortrack,59.6percentoftheathleteswerewhite,whichisa0.8percentagepointfallfromlast
year;AfricanAmericanparticipationremainedconstantat29.1percentendingasteadytrendofgrowth
inthiscategoryinpreviousyears.
Insoftball,changewasseenintheWhitedemographic,whichfellto77.5percent(down0.1percentage
points).Intheremainingdemographics,Latinasaccountedfor7.4percent(up0.1percentagepoints),
AfricanAmericansfor7.7percent(down0.2percentagepoints),otherfor2.4percent(down0.4
percentagepoints),Asians2.7percent(up0.2percentagepoints),andintheAmericanIndian/Alaskan
Nativescategorytherewasanincreaseof0.1percentagepointsto0.8percent.
Overtheyears,therehasnotbeenmuchvarianceintheracialmakeupofthemalestudentathlete
populationacrossallDivisionIsports.Thisyearsdatasupportsthisobservation,aswhiteparticipation
decreasedby1.3percentagepointstobringthetotalto62.5.AfricanAmericanmaleparticipation
increasedslightlyto24.9percent,whichisariseof0.1percentagepointsfromlastyear.Latino
representationreachedanalltimehighat4.2percent,anincreaseof0.2percentagepointsfromlast
yearspreviousrecord.
ForfemaleathletesacrossallDivisionIasport,thelevelofchangeinthedemographicswasalsovery
low.AfricanAmericanfemaleparticipationremainedconstantatitsalltimehighof16.0percentand
Latinaparticipationalsoreacheditsalltimehighat4.2percent(up0.3percentagepoints).
AccordingtotheNCAA20092010StudentAthleteEthnicityReport,thepercentageofwhitemale
studentathletesattheDivisionI,IIandIIIcombinedwere70.4percent,18.7percentforAfrican
Americanmales,4.3percentforLatinos,1.5percentforAsianmen,0.3percentforAmerican
Indian/AlaskanNativesand0.8percentformalesofTwoorMoreRaces.
ThepercentageofwhitefemalestudentathletesattheDivisionI,IIandIIIcombinedwere77.2percent,
11.6percentforAfricanAmericanfemales,4.0percentforLatinas,1.5percentforAsianfemales,0.4
percentforAmericanIndian/AlaskanNativefemalesand1.0percentforfemalesofTwoorMoreRaces.
InDivisionsI,IIandIII,whitemalestudentathletescomprised62.5,64.7and80.7percentofthetotal
malestudentathletes,respectively.InDivisionI,whitefemalestudentathletescomprised70.6percent
ofthetotalfemalestudentathletepopulation.InDivisionII,theymakeup75.7percentandinDivision
III,85.3percent.
InDivisionI,IIandIII,AfricanAmericanmalestudentathletesmakeup24.9,24.4and10.0percentof
totalmalestudentathletes,respectivelywhileLatinosmadeup4.2,5.9and3.6percent,respectively
14|P a g e
andAsianscomprised1.5,1.0and1.8percent,respectively.NativeAmericansmadeup0.4,0.5and0.2
percent,respectivelyandmalesofTwoorMoreRacesmadeup1.0,0.7and0.7percent,respectively.
InDivisionI,IIandIII,AfricanAmericanfemalestudentathletescomprised16.0,13.6and5.6percentof
thetotalfemalestudentathletepopulation,respectivelywhileLatinasmadeup4.2,5.5and2.9percent,
respectivelyandAsianscomprised2.1,1.3and1.9percent,respectively.NativeAmericansmadeup0.4,
0.5and0.3percent,respectivelyandfemalesofTwoorMoreRacesmadeup1.1,1.0and0.8percent,
respectively.
AccordingtotheNCAA,42.8percentofallNCAADivisionI,IIandIIIstudentathletescombinedare
femaleand57.2percentaremale.
AllstudentathletedatacamefromtheNCAA20092010StudentAthleteEthnicityReport.
GradeforStudentathleteparticipation:
Race:
A+
Gender:
A+
SeeTables8,9and10.
HeadCoaches
Institutionscontinuedtobecriticizedfortheirhiringpracticessincethevastmajorityofheadcoaching
positionsincollegesports,bothformensandwomensteams,continuedtobefilledwithwhitemales.
Actionhasbeentakentoimprovethissituation.TheBlackCoachesandAdministrators(BCA)issueda
FootballHiringReportCardinOctobereveryyearfrom2004to2010toassesshowuniversitieshandle
theprocessforhiringheadfootballcoaches.ItevaluateswhethertheschoolcontactedtheBCAfor
assistance,whoservedonthesearchcommittee,whichcandidateswereinterviewed,whowashired,
andwhethertheathleticdepartmentfollowedtheirschoolsaffirmativeactionguidelines.Thisfootball
hiringreportcardhasbeenaverypositivetoolinevaluatingthehiringprocessofcollegecoaches
regardingincreasingcandidatesofcoloranddiversesearchcommittees.Thepositivegainsforcoaches
atFBSinstitutionswerereflectedinthepositivehiringtrendsforcoachesofcolorinfootballthatwere
discussedinthesectiononUniversityLeadershipPositionsatFBSInstitutionssectionnearthebeginning
ofthisreport.
Inthe200809year,thepercentageofAfricanAmericanscoachingmensteamsdecreasedinDivisionI
IIandIII,whilewhitescoachingmensteamsincreasedinDivisionsIandIIandfellinDivisionIIIatevery
level.
Whitescontinuedtodominateascoachesofmensteamsofeachdivision.Whitesheld89.3percent(up
from89.2percentin200708),89.2percent(upfrom88.7percentin200708)and92.3percent(down
from92.5percentin200708)ofallheadcoachingpositionsinDivisionsI,IIandIII,respectively.
15|P a g e
AfricanAmericansheld6.6percent(downfrom7.2percentin200708),4.8percent(downfrom5.3
percentin200708)and3.7percent(downfrom4.0percentin200708)ofthemensheadcoaching
positionsinthethreeNCAAdivisions,respectively.Latinosheld1.8percent,3.3percent,and1.4
percentofheadcoachingpositionsformensteamsintherespectivedivisions(1.6,3.9,and1.5percent
in200708respectively).Asiansheld0.7,0.8,and0.7percentofheadcoachingpositionsformens
teamsintherespectivedivisions,whichshowedslightdecreasesinDivisionIandII,butincreased
slightlyforDivisionIIIcomparedtothatof200708.NativeAmericanrepresentationwasminimal.These
figuresaccountedformaleandfemaleheadcoachesofmensteams.
AmongthemostalarmingstatisticsintheRGRCwasanotherdeclineforAfricanAmericansthisyearin
DivisionImensbasketball.In200809,AfricanAmericanmenaccountedfor21.0percentofthemens
basketballheadcoachingpositionsattheDivisionIlevel,whichwasa1.9percentagepointdecrease
fromthelastreportcard.Itrepresenteda4.2percentagepointdropfrom200506whenitwas25.2
percent.Thiswasthelowestpointsincethe199798year.LatinosandNativeAmericansheld0.7and
0.3percent,respectively,ofthecoachingpositions.
TherearenoothermensorwomenssportsthatevencameclosetobeingasdiverseasDivisionImens
basketball.
In200809inallofDivisionI,AfricanAmericansheld5.1percentandLatinosheld1.2percentofthe
footballheadcoachingpositions.
Thirteenofthe120FBSheadcoacheswereAfricanAmericanduringthe2010collegiatefootballseason,
anincreaseofsixfromlastyearsstudy.Priortothestartofthe2010season,sixnewAfricanAmerican
coacheswerehired,includingJokerPhillipsbyKentucky,CharlieStrongbyLouisville,MikeLondonby
Virginia,RuffinMcNeillbyEastCarolina,LarryPorterbyMemphisandWillieTaggartbyWestern
Kentucky.Also,TurnerGillwashiredtoaheadcoachingpositioninahighprofileconference,moving
fromBuffalototheUniversityofKansas.
Thereweretwootherheadcoachesofcolorforatotaloffifteeninthe2010season.Thiswasthe
highestnumberinthehistoryofFBSschools.
Inthe2010season,therewere120headfootballcoachesatFBSschools.Ofthe120,105(87.5percent)
werewhite.Inaddition,therewere:
Thirteen(10.8percent)AfricanAmericans
o RuffinMcNeill,EastCarolinaUniversity
o RonEnglish,EasternMichiganUniversity
o KevinSumlin,UniversityofHouston
o TurnerGill,UniversityofKansas
o JokerPhillips,UniversityofKentucky
o CharlieStrong,UniversityofLouisville
o LarryPorter,UniversityofMemphis
o RandyShannon,UniversityofMiami(Florida)
o MikeHaywood,MiamiUniversity(Ohio)
o MikeLocksley,UniversityofNewMexico
o DeWayneWalker,NewMexicoStateUniversity
o MikeLondon,UniversityofVirginia
16|P a g e
o WillieTaggart,WesternKentuckyUniversity
One(0.8percent)Latino
o MarioCristobal,FloridaInternationalUniversity
One(0.8percent)Asian
o KenNiumatalolo,U.S.NavalAcademy
ZeroNativeAmericans
Attheendofthe2010season,twooftheabovementionedcoacheslosttheirjob,RandyShannonat
theUniversityofMiamiandMikeHaywood,wholeftforPittsburghbutwasthendismissedforoffthe
fieldissues.However,fiveotherAfricanAmericanswerehiredasheadcoachesduringtheoffseason:
JonEmbreeatColorado,DarrellHazellatKentState,DonTreadwellatMiami(Ohio),DavidShawat
StanfordandJamesFranklinatVanderbilt.ThisbringsthetotalnumberofAfricanAmericanhead
coachesto16andthetotalnumberofheadcoachesofcolorto18.Thisisanalltimehigh.
Theoffensiveanddefensivecoordinatorsareoftenviewedasthepipelinefortheheadcoaching
position.AmongtheFBSschools,therewere266coacheswhowereconsideredeitheroffensiveor
defensivecoordinators.Thisnumberexcludessevenoffensiveordefensivecoordinators(Georgia
InstituteofTechnology;KentState;UniversityofNevada,Reno;NewMexicoStateUniversity;University
ofSouthCarolina,Columbia;TexasA&MUniversity,CollegeStation;WesternMichiganUniversity)who
alsoserveastheheadcoach.
Ofthe266coordinators,225(84.6percent)werewhite,30(11.3percent)wereAfricanAmerican,three
(1.1percent)wereLatinoandfive(1.9percent)wereAsian.TherewerethreemoreAfricanAmerican
coordinatorsfromlastyearandadecreaseofonecoordinatorforLatinos,whilethenumberofAsian
coordinatorsremainedthesame.
InDivisionIbaseball,thepercentageofpeopleofcoloroccupyingtheheadcoachpositionwasonly5.0
percent,with2.6percentLatino,1.1percentAsian,1.1percentAfricanAmerican,and0.2percent
fallingintotheothercategory.
DivisionItendstohavethemostdiversegroupofcoaches,withlessdiversityattheDivisionIIand
DivisionIIIlevels.Formensbasketballinalldivisionscombined,AfricanAmericansheld12.6percent(a
decreaseof0.2percent)oftheheadcoachingpositions.Inalldivisionscombinedforfootball,African
Americansheld2.6percentofthecoachingpositions,adecreaseof0.6percentagepointsfromthelast
reportcard.Inalldivisionscombinedforbaseball,AfricanAmericansheld1.2percent,up0.2
percentagepoints.Whites,ontheotherhand,held85.2(increaseof0.1percentagepoints),95.6
percent(increaseof0.4percentagepoints)and94.1percent(decreaseof0.6percentagepoints)ofthe
headpositionsinbasketball,footballandbaseball,respectively.Latinosgainedgroundinbasketballto
1.0percentandbaseballto3.0percentwhilestayingconstantat0.5percentinfootballheadcoaching
positions.
AfricanAmericansweresounderrepresentedasheadcoaches,thatonceagain,thepercentofwomen
coachingmensteamsactuallyexceededthatofAfricanAmericansinDivisionIII(4.6percentversus3.7
percent.)InDivisionII,thepercentageofwomencoachingmensteamswassimilarlylowtothe
percentageofAfricanAmericans(3.5percentversus4.8percent).
InDivisionI,womencoachingmensteamsbarelyfellshortofLatinos,AsiansandNativeAmericans
combined(2.7percentvs.2.8percent).
17|P a g e
MorethanthreeandahalfdecadesafterthepassageofTitleIX,womencoachingwomensteamsstill
donotrepresentthemajorityofcoachesinthewomensgame.Inaddition,thisyearsnumbersshow
noprogressinwomencoachingwomenssportsinmostsports.WomenheadcoachesinDivisionI
basketballincreasedslightly(65.9percentin200809and64.7percentin200708).Headcoachesof
DivisionITrack/CrossCountry,whichcombinestheheadcoachesofCrossCountry,IndoorTrackand
OutdoorTrack,sawaslightdecreaseinfemaleheadcoachesfrom20.2percentin200708to19.7
percentin200809.Inallothersports,menled55.5percentofthewomensteamswhilewomenwere
headcoachesinonly45.5percentoftheprograms.
Thefemalecoachingtotalswere40.0percentforwomensteamsand2.7percentofmensteamsfor
DivisionI.Theywere32.9percentofwomensteamsand3.5percentofmensteamsforDivisionII.
Theywere39.4percentofwomensteamsand4.6percentofmensteamsforDivisionIII.
Justasthereweresportssingledoutforthemensteams,itisimportanttolookmorecloselyat
particularwomenssportsaswell.Thisservestoobtainabalancedviewofcoachingpositionsonthe
womensteams.TheRacialandGenderReportCardexaminestheheadcoachingpercentagesin
womensbasketballandcrosscountry/indoorandoutdoortrackprograms.
Whitesheld83.8percent(downfrom85.6percentin200708)ofDivisionIwomensbasketballhead
coachingpositions.Womenheld65.9percentofthesepositions(upfrom64.7percentin200708).The
percentageofwhitewomenheadcoachesinDivisionIwomensbasketballincreasedslightlyfrom53.7
percentin200708to53.9percentin200809.Meanwhile,whitemenalsodecreasedfrom31.9percent
to29.9percent.AfricanAmericanwomenheld11.4percentandAfricanAmericanmenheld3.9percent
foracombinedpercentageof15.3percent(upfrom13.6percent).TherewerenoAsianorNative
Americancoaches.Only0.6percentofthepositionswereheldbyLatinoheadcoaches.
Allofthisstandsinstarkcontrasttothe51.5percentofthestudentathletesplayingwomens
basketballwhowereAfricanAmerican.ThedisparityiswhatcompelledtheBCAtoinitiateawomens
basketballhiringreportcardfor200708fortheFBSschools.
HeadcoachesinNCAADivisionItrack/crosscountryteamshavethehighestandstillincreasing
percentofpeopleofcolorinheadcoachingpositionsforwomenscollegesports.Whitesheld80.2
percentoftheseposts(upfrom79.9percentin200708),AfricanAmericansheld16.2percent(down
from16.3percentin200708).Meanwhile,Latinosheld1.4percentoftheseposts(downfrom2.4
percentin200708).Womenoverallheld19.7percentofthesepositions(downfrom20.2percentin
200708).AfricanAmericanwomendecreasedslightlyfrom2008to5.9percentandwhitewomen
droppedto12.8percentofthesepositions(downfrom13.1percentin200708).Mencoached80.2
percentofthemensandwomenstrack/crosscountryteams,whichincreasedfrom79.2percentthat
hadheldconstantintheprevioustworeportcards.
DespiteagreatdealofprogressinthepercentageofAfricanAmericanscoachingwomensteams,
whitesstilldominatedascoachesofwomensteamsofeachdivision.Whitesheld87.7percent(no
changefrompreviousreportcard),89.5percent(upfrom88.9percentin200708)and91.9percent(no
changefrom200708)ofallheadcoachingpositionsofwomenssportsinDivisionsI,IIandIII,
respectively.
18|P a g e
AfricanAmericansheld7.2percent(upfrom7.0percentin200708),4.8percent(downfrom5.1
percentin200708)and3.9percent(downfrom4.4percentin200708)ofthewomensheadcoaching
percentofheadcoachingpositionsforwomensteamsintherespectivedivisions(2.1,2.8,and1.2
percentin200708respectively).Asiansheld1.1,1.0,and1.3percentofheadcoachingpositionsfor
womensteamsintherespectivedivisions,whichshowedadecreaseinDivisionIandDivisionII,witha
slightincreaseinDivisionIIIfrom200708.NativeAmericanrepresentationwasminimal.Thesefigures
accountedformaleandfemaleheadcoachesofwomensteams.
GradeforHeadCoachesforallDivisionIMensteams:
Race:
C+/B
GradeforHeadCoachesforallDivisionIWomensteams:
Race:
B
Gender:
C+
+GradeforHeadCoachesforallFBSfootballteams:
Race:
B
+GradeforFBSfootballheadcoachestakesintoconsiderationallcoacheshiredthis
offseason
GradeforHeadCoachesforallDivisionIMensbasketballteams:
Race:
A
GradeforHeadcoachesforallDivisionIWomensbasketballteams:
Race:
B/B+
Gender:
A+
SeeTables11,12,13,14,15,16,17and18.
AssistantCoaches
Theassistantcoachpositionisoftenseenasasteppingstonetotheheadcoachpositionwhichattracts
alltheattention,recognitionandincome.Inaddition,theheadcoachholdsallthepowerwithinateam
dynamic.
InDivisionImensbasketballandfootball,39.5and17.7percentofthejobswereheldbyAfrican
Americans,respectively.Only1.2percentoftheassistantbaseballcoachesareAfricanAmerican.The
percentagesdropto26.8forbasketballand17.6percentforfootballinalldivisionscombined.Latinos
hold1.5percentofthebasketballjobsand3.8percentoftheassistantpostsinbaseball.
Onthemensteamsin200809,whitesheld76.8,79.5,and87.3percentoftheassistantcoaching
positionsinthethreedivisions,respectively,from76.9,79.0,and88.1percentrespectivelyin200708.
19|P a g e
In200809,AfricanAmericansheld18.1,13.3,and8.1percent,respectively.In200708,African
Americansheld17.7,14.2and8.3percentoftheassistantcoachingjobsonmensteamsinthe
respectivedivisions.In200809,Latinosheld2.1,4.4,and2.0percentrespectivelyinDivisionsI,II,and
III.Asiansheld0.8,0.8,and0.6percentrespectivelyinDivisionsI,II,andIII.NativeAmericansheld0.1,
0.3,and0.1percentinDivisionsI,II,andIIIrespectively.
Amongthewomensteamsin200809,whitesheld78.8,81.8,and88.9percentoftheassistant
coachingpositionsinDivisionsI,IIandIII,respectively,from79.1,81.2and88.8percentrespectivelyin
200708.In200809,AfricanAmericanshad14.2,9.7,and5.9percentrespectively.In200708,African
Americansheld13.5,10.3and6.4percentoftheassistantcoachingjobsonwomensteamsinthe
respectiveDivisions.
Latinosheld2.3,4.6,and2.0percentoftheassistantcoachingpositionsonwomensteamsinDivisions
I,II,andIIIrespectively.Asiansheld1.6,1.4,and1.0percentofthepositionsinDivisionsI,II,andIII
respectively.NativeAmericansheld0.3,0.2,and0.0percentofthepositionsinDivisionI,II,andIII
respectively.
ThepercentageofwomenassistantsonwomensteamsdeclinedinDivisionIandDivisionIIIandsawa
slightincreaseattheDivisionIIlevel.Asassistants,womenin200809held49.0ofthepositionsin
DivisionI,49.7inDivisionIIand49.3percentinDivisionIII.In200708,womenheld49.4,48.9,and49.5
percentofthejobs,respectively.
Womenhaveincreasedtheirpresencewithincoachingstaffsofmensteamsatalllevelsdecreasing
theirpercentagesto8.5,8.5,and8.8percent,respectivelyinDivisionI,II,andIII.Thisisupfrom7.2,7.9
and8.4percent,respectivelyin200708.
InDivisionIII,thereisasimilarpercentageofwomen(8.8percent)asassistantsonmensteamsasthere
areAfricanAmericanmenandwomenassistantscombinedonmensteams(8.1percent).
GradeforAssistantCoachesonDivisionImensteams:
Race:
A
GradeforAssistantCoachesonwomensteams:
Race:
B+/A
Gender:
A+
SeeTables19,20,21,22,23and24.
CollegeAthleticDirectors
InallofDivisionI,whitesheld88.8percent(down1.2percentagepoints)ofathleticdirectorjobs.
AfricanAmericansheld7.4percent(up0.2percentagepoints).Latinosheld2.2(up0.3percentage
points).NativeAmericansheld0.9percentandtherewerenoAsianADsinDivisionI.
20|P a g e
Womencontinuetostruggletoincreaserepresentationintheathleticdirectorposition.However,the
percentageoffemaleathleticdirectorsattheDivisionIleveldidincreasefromthepreviousreportto8.3
percent(up0.5percentagepoints)ofallpositions.Ofthesepositions,whitewomenheld7.0percent
andAfricanAmericanwomenheld0.7percent.LatinaandNativeAmericanfemaleseachmadeup0.3
percentofallADsinDivisionI,whiletherewerenoAsianfemaleADs.
AsofOctober2010,therewerenineAfricanAmerican,fourLatinoandoneNativeAmericanathletic
directorsatFBSinstitutions.Ofthe120ADswhooverseeFBSfootballprograms,therewere106(88.3
percent)whites.Thepeopleofcolorincludedthefollowing.
Nine(7.5percent)AfricanAmericans
o WardeManuel,StateUniversityofNewYorkatBuffalo
o KeithR.Tribble,UniversityofCentralFlorida
o DerrickGragg,EasternMichiganUniversity
o McKinleyBostonJr.,NewMexicoStateUniversity
o GeneSmith,TheOhioStateUniversity
o DarylJ.Gross,SyracuseUniversity
o KevinAnderson,UniversityofMaryland,CollegePark
o DavidWilliamsII,VanderbiltUniversity
o CraigK.Littlepage,UniversityofVirginia
Four(3.3percent)Latinos
o DanielG.Guerrero,UniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles
o PeteGarcia,FloridaInternationalUniversity
o RickVillarreal,UniversityofNorthTexas
o BarryAlvarez,UniversityofWisconsin,Madison
One(0.8percent)NativeAmerican
o RickDickson(TulaneUniversity)
NoAsians
Therewerefivewhitewomen(4.2percent)inchargeofanFBSschool:
o LisaLove,ArizonaStateUniversity
o AnneSandyBarbour,UniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley
o DeborahA.Yow,NorthCarolinaStateUniversity
o CarySueGroth,UniversityofNevada
o KathyBeauregard,WesternMichiganUniversity
Twowomenheadaseparatewomensdepartmentanddonotoverseefootball:JoanC.Cronan
(WomensAD),UniversityofTennessee,KnoxvilleandChristineA.Plonsky(WomensAD),Universityof
TexasatAustin.
ThelevelofdiversitywithintheathleticdirectorpositionatFBSschoolshasdecreasedfrom16(13.3
percent)to14(11.7percent)peopleofcolorwhoholdthisposition.
Whenconsideringalldivisionscombined,theathleticdirectorpositionwasoneofthewhitestpositions
inallofsportwhenHBCUswereexcluded.Theonlypositionthathadagreaterpercentageofwhites
fillingthepositionwastheSportsInformationDirectorwhichis95.4,88.3,and94.7percentwhitein
DivisionI,IIandIIIrespectively.
21|P a g e
Attheathleticsdirectorposition,whitesheld88.8percent(down1.2percentagepoints)oftheathletics
directorjobsinDivisionI,92.7percentinDivisionII(up0.7percentagepoints)and96.2percentin
DivisionIII(down0.8ofapercentagepoint).AfricanAmericansheld7.4,3.1and2.2percent
respectivelyinDivisionsI,IIandIII.Thiscomparedto7.2percent,3.8percentand1.8percentin2007
08respectively.Latinosaccountedfor2.2,3.1,and0.4percentoftheADsatDivisionI,IIandIII,
comparedto1.9,3.0and0.0percentin200708,respectively.Asiansaccountedfor0.0,0.8,and0.6
percentoftheADsatDivisionI,IIandIIIandNativeAmericansaccountedfor0.9,0.0,and0.2percentof
theADsateachlevelin200910.
WomenlostgroundasADsinDivisionIIandgainedgroundinDivisionIandDivisionIII.AttheDivisionII
level,thepercentageoffemaleathleticdirectorsdroppedslightlyby0.1percentagepointsto15.5
percent.Incontrast,thepercentageoffemaleathleticdirectorsincreasedto8.3percent(up0.5
percentagepoints)and27.4percent(up0.3percentagepoints)inDivisionIandDivisionIIIrespectively.
FurtherbreakdownoftheathleticdirectorpositionattheDivisionIIlevel,excludingtheHBCUs,shows
thatwhitesheld92.7percent(0.7percentagepointincrease)oftheathleticdirectorjobs,African
Americansdecreasedto3.1percent(0.7percentagepointdecrease),Latinosheld3.1percent(0.1
percentagepointincrease),Asiansremainedconstantat0.8percentandNativeAmericans0.0percent
(0.4percentagepointdecrease).Thepercentageofwhitemenincreased0.8percentagepoints,from
78.0percentto78.8percent.
Womenheld15.5percent(0.1percentagepointdecrease)ofDivisionIIathleticdirectorposts.White
womencomprised13.9percent(0.1percentagepointdecrease),0.8percentwereAfricanAmerican
women,and0.8percentwereAsianwomen.Bothofthesecategoriesremainedconstantfromthe
previousreport.
AlthoughDivisionIIIhasapoorrecordforracialdiversityamongathleticdirectors,thisdivisiondoes
offerwomenthegreatestopportunitytoservethisposition.Womenheld27.4percentoftheathletic
directorjobs,anincreaseof0.3percentagepoints.Amongthefemaleathleticdirectors,whitewomen
held26.2percent,whileAfricanAmericanwomenandAsianwomeneachheld0.4percent,respectively.
TherewerenoLatinaathleticdirectors.
GradeforDivisionIAthleticDirectors:
Race:
C+/B
Gender:
F
SeeTables25,26,and27.
CollegeAssociateandAssistantAthleticDirectors
Asinallcasesregardingemploymentincollegeathletics,thedatareportedonassociateandassistant
athleticdirectors,seniorwomanadministratorsandfacultyathleticsrepresentativesexcludesthe
HBCUs.
22|P a g e
Thesenioradministrativetitleincludesboththeassociateandassistantathleticdirectorpositions.These
jobsarethoughtofasthepipelinetotheathleticsdirectorposition.Peopleinbothofthesepositions
workverycloselywiththeathleticdirectorandtheyareoftentraininggroundsforfutureathletic
directors.Inthehierarchyofpower,associateathleticdirectorsdofallaboveassistantathleticdirectors.
Althoughthesearetwoseparatepositions,thedemographicmakeupofeachslotisstrikinglysimilarat
theDivisionIlevel.
Attheassociateathleticdirectorposition,whitescomprised88.5percent,82.8percent,and92.6
percentofthetotalpopulationatDivisionI,IIandIIIrespectively.
AfricanAmericansheld8.2percent,14.4percentand5.4percentofthepositionsateachlevel.Latinos
held1.8percent,1.0percentand0.4percentofthepositionsateachlevel.Asiansheld0.7percentand
1.0percentinDivisionsIandII.TherewerenoAsiansinDivisionIIIinthispositionandnoNative
AmericansinDivisionsIIorIII.InDivisionI,NativeAmericanshad0.3percentoftheassociateathletic
directorpositions.
Thepercentageofwomenfillingassociateathleticdirectorpositionswas31.1percentinDivisionI,42.0
percentinDivisionIIand46.1percentinDivisionIII.
Attheassistantathleticdirectorposition,whitesheld88.3,84.7and91.5percentofthepositionsin
DivisionsI,IIandIII,respectively.
AfricanAmericanstotaled8.2,9.8and5.2percentofassistantathleticdirectorsintherespective
divisions.Latinosheld1.9percent,2.7percentand2.1percentofthepositionsateachlevel.Asiansheld
0.9percent,1.7percentand0.2percentofthepositionsateachlevel.TherewerenoNativeAmericans
inDivisionIII.InDivisionIandDivisionII,NativeAmericanshad0.1and0.3percentoftheassistant
athleticdirectorpositionsrespectively.
Womenoccupied28.5percentoftheassistantathleticdirectorsinDivisionI,38.1percentinDivisionII
and39.1percentinDivisionIII.
Onaverage,thepositionsofassociateathleticdirectorandassistantathleticdirectorforDivisionIwere
foundtobe88.4percentwhite,8.2percentAfricanAmerican,0.8percentAsian,and1.9percentLatino.
ForDivisionII,83.8percentwerewhite,12.1percentAfricanAmerican,1.4percentAsian,and1.9
percentLatinoandinDivisionIII,92.1percentwerewhite,5.3percentAfricanAmerican,0.1percent
Asian,and1.3percentLatino.
Lookingattheoverallpercentagesofwomenforboththeassociateathleticdirectorandtheassistant
athleticdirectorpositionscombinedfor29.8percent,40.2percent,and42.6percentinDivisionsI,II,
andIII.
InDivisionsIandII,thegenderbreakdownwasverysimilarbetweenassociateandassistantADsintheir
respectivedivisions.Associateathleticdirectorswere69.2percentmaleand31.1percentfemalein
DivisionIandassistantathleticdirectorswere71.5percentmaleand28.5percentfemaleinDivisionI.
ForDivisionII,associateathleticdirectorswere58.0maleand42.0percentfemaleandassistantathletic
directorswere61.9percentmaleand38.1percentfemale.AttheDivisionIIIlevel,theassociateathletic
directorpositionwasclosertoa50/50splitbetweenmalesandfemales,withmalesholding53.9
23|P a g e
percentandfemalesholding46.1percentwhiletheassistantathleticdirectorpositionhadmales
holding60.5percentandfemalesholding39.1percent.
GradeforDivisionIAssociateandAssistantAthleticDirectors:
Race:
C+/B
Gender:
B
SeeTable28.
SeniorWomanAdministrator
Theseniorwomanadministrator(SWA)isasignificanttitlewithinanathleticdepartment.Womenheld
100percentoftheSWAjobsateachlevelofcollegesport.
Whitewomencontinuedtodominateat85.1,81.1and93.7percentinDivisionI,IIandIII,respectively.
InDivisionI,AfricanAmericanwomenheld10.1percent(down0.1percentagepoints),Asianwomen
held1.0percent,Latinasheld2.3percentandNativeAmericanwomenheld1.0percent.Overallatotal
of14.9percentofthepositionswereoccupiedbyfemalesofcolor,anincreaseof1.5percentagepoints.
TheseniorwomanadministratorpositionisslightlymorediverseattheDivisionIIlevel.Whitewomen
held81.1percentofthesepositions,a4.2percentagepointdrop.AfricanAmericanwomenheld15.4
percent;Latinasheld2.1percentandAsiansaccountedfor0.3percent.Womenofcolormadegains
withanincreasefrom11.3to18.9percent.Overallwomenheld100percentofalltheseniorwoman
administratorpositionsinDivisionII.
SeniorwomanadministratorsinDivisionIIIwere100percentfemale.Ofthesewomen,93.7percent
werewhitewomen,4.2percentwereAfricanAmericanwomen,0.9percentwereLatina,0.2percent
wereNativeAmerican,and0.2percentwereAsianwomen.Peopleofcolor,whichwereallwomenof
color,increasedfrom3.4to6.3percent.
GradeforDivisionISeniorWomanAdministrators:
Race:
B
Gender:
A+
SeeTable29.
FacultyAthleticsRepresentatives
Whitesfilledthevastmajorityofthefacultyathleticrepresentative(FAR)positionswith84.4,86.4and
94.2percentinDivisionsI,IIandIII,respectively,in200910.
24|P a g e
InDivisionI,60.4percentwerewhitemenand24.0percentwerewhitewomen.AmongAfrican
AmericansservingasFARs,9.2percentweremenand3.0percentwerewomen.TotalAfrican
Americansinthispositionincreasedby7.1percentagepoints.AlsoamongtheFARpositionsinDivision
I,0.9percentwereAsianmenand0.6percentwereAsianwomen,and0.3percentwereLatinowomen.
TherewerenoNativeAmericansinthispost.Womenheld27.9percentoftheseposts(anincreaseof
2.5percentagepoints),whilepeopleofcolorheld15.6percent(anincreaseof8.0percentagepoints).
TherewerenoLatinawomeninthisposition.
AttheDivisionIIlevelwherewhitesheld86.4percentoftheFARposts,65.9percentwerewhitemen
and20.5percentwerewhitewomen.AfricanAmericansheldatotalof9.9percentofthepositions(8.5
percentmaleand1.4percentfemale).Asianmendecreasedfrom0.8percentto0.3percent.Latinos
decreasedfrom2.7to2.4percent(1.7percentbeingmaleand0.7percentfemale).Womenoverall
decreased0.5percentagepointsfrom23.4to22.9percent.Lastly,Peopleofcolorinthisposition
increasedby6.0percentagepoints.
InDivisionIIIwherewhitesheld94.2percent,62.6percentwerewhitemenand31.6percentwere
whitewomen.Thepercentageofwhitemenroseby0.7percentagepoints,whereasthepercentageof
whitewomendecreased1.0percentagepoint.AfricanAmericansaccountedforatotalof3.6percent,
whichwereheldby3.0percentmenand0.6percentwomen.Latinosheld1.0percent(0.8percentmale
and0.2percentfemale)oftheFARpositions.Asiansaccountedfor0.8percent(0.8percentmaleand
0.0percentfemale).Thepercentageofwhitesdroppedby0.3percentagepoints,whileAfrican
Americanmenincreasedby0.3percentagepoints.Womenheld32.4percentoftheFARpostsin
DivisionIII,alossof0.8percentagepoints.
AsofOctober2010,therewerefiveAfricanAmerican,oneLatina,oneAsianandoneNativeAmerican
facultyathleticsrepresentativesatFBSinstitutions.Ofthe120FBSschools,thereare124faculty
athleticsrepresentativessince theUniversityofIllinois,Champaign;theUniversityofMinnesota,Twin
Cities;OhioUniversity,andPurdueUniversityeachhavetwo. Thepeopleofcolorincluded:
Five(4percent)AfricanAmericans
o PercyBates,UniversityofMichigan
o AlexByrd,RiceUniversity
o WilliamSmith,UniversityofUtah
o LuciusOutlaw,VanderbiltUniversity
o BeStoney,KansasStateUniversity
Two(1.6percent)Latinas
o ConsueloStebbins,UniversityofCentralFlorida
o Col.MaritzaRyan,U.S.MilitaryAcademy,WestPoint(Army)
One(0.8)Asian
o L.J.KelvinCoong,OregonStateUniversity
ZeroNativeAmericans
Thereare38whitewomen(30.7percent)intotalservingasfacultyathleticsrepresentatives.
+GradeforDivisionIFacultyAthleticsRepresentatives:
Race:
D
Gender:
B
25|P a g e
SeeTable30.
SportsInformationDirectors
ThesportsinformationdirectorpositionisoneofthewhitestpositionsinallofsportwhenHBCUsare
excluded.Itis95.4,88.3,and94.7percentwhiteinDivisionI,IIandIIIrespectively.Thisisvery
importantbecausetheSIDisusuallythekeydecisionmakerinwhatandwhoispublicizedamong
coachesandstudentathletes.
TheSIDpositioninDivisionIathleticsis95.4percentwhite,1.4percentAfricanAmerican,1.4percent
Asian,1.9percentLatino,and0.0percentNativeAmerican.InDivisionsIIandIII,thepositionmakeup
forthesportinformationdirectorwasverysimilar.DivisionIIconsistedof88.3percentwhite,8.1
percentAfricanAmerican,1.4percentAsian,1.8percentLatino,and0.0percentNativeAmerican.
DivisionIIIconsistedof94.7percentwhite,3.7percentAfricanAmerican,0.5percentAsian,1.2percent
Latino,andonceagain,noNativeAmericans.
+GradeforDivisionISportsInformationDirectors:
Race:
F
Gender:
F
SeeTable31.
ProfessionalAdministration
Thiscategoryincludesawiderangeofjobdescriptions.AtNCAAmemberinstitutions,jobsthatfitinthis
categoryareacademicadvisor/counselor,compliancecoordinator/officer,thesportsinformation
directorandassistantdirectors,strengthcoaches,lifeskillscoordinators,andmanagersforbusiness,
equipment,fundraiser/development,facilities,promotions/marketingandtickets.Asinallcases
regardingemploymentincollegeathletics,thedatareportedinthissectionexcludestheHBCUs.These
positionsareoftenstartingpointsfromwhichmanypeopleriseintohigherlevelslotswithinauniversity
orathleticdepartment.Thisreportshowsthatopportunitiesforwomenhaveincreasedasyoulookat
eachlevelofcollegiateathletics,andthepercentagesofpositionsheldbywomenareveryclose.The
percentageofpeopleofcolorfillingthesepositionsincreaseswhilemovingfromDivisionItoII,butthen
fallsdrasticallywhenmovingtoDivisionIII.
Althoughtherewasimprovementforpeopleofcolorinallthreedivisions,whitesstilldominatedthe
professionaladministrationcategorybyholding83.7percent(downfrom86.4percentin2008),82.5
percent(downfrom88.6percentin2008)and92.5percent(downfrom93.5percentin2008)ofall
professionaladministrationpositionsinDivisionsI,IIandIII,respectively.
26|P a g e
AfricanAmericansheld10.8percent,11.8percentand4.5percentofallprofessionaladministration
percentofheadcoachingpositionsforallprofessionaladministrationpositionsintherespective
divisions.Asiansheld1.5,1.2,and1.0percentofallprofessionaladministrationpositionsinDivisionsI,II
andIII,respectively.NativeAmericanrepresentationwasminimal.
Womenaccountedfor42.5,43.5and46.2ofallprofessionaladministrationpositionsinthethreeNCAA
divisions,respectively.Thatrepresentedasubstantialpercentagepointincreaseof7.6,10.8,and7.4in
DivisionI,DivisionII,andDivisionIIrespectively.
Womenwereespeciallywellrepresentedinthepositionsofacademicadvisor/counselor,lifeskills
coordinator,businessmanager,andcompliancecoordinator/officer.Intheacademicadvisor/counselor
position,womenheld61.6percentofthepositionsatDivisionIinstitutions.Withinthelifeskills
coordinatorposition,womenheld74.1percentofthepositionsatDivisionIinstitutions.
Inthebusinessmanagerposition,54.5percentofthepositionswereheldbywomenatDivisionI
institutions.Thecompliancecoordinator/officeralsohadastrongrepresentationofwomenatthe
DivisionIlevelholding53.2percentoftheslots.
GradeforDivisionIProfessionalAdministrators:
Race:
B+
Gender:
A
SeeTables32and33.
NCAADiversityInitiatives
AscanbeseeninAppendixII,CollegeSporthasoutstandingdiversityinitiatives.
NCAAGradeforDiversityInitiatives:A+
27|P a g e
HOWGRADESARECALCULATED
The2010CollegeRacialandGenderReportCarddatashowedthatcollegeathleticsdepartmentshiring
practiceshaveimprovedbutstilldonotnearlyreflectthenumberofstudentathletesofcolor
competingontheirteams.Federalaffirmativeactionpoliciesstatethattheworkplaceshouldreflectthe
percentageofthepeopleintheracialgroupinthepopulation.Thus,withapproximately24percentof
thepopulationbeingpeopleofcolor,anAwasachievedif24percentofthepositionswereheldby
peopleofcolor,Bif12percentofthepositionswereheldbypeopleofcolor,Cifithadonly9percent,a
Difitwasatleast6percentandFforanythingbelowthat.
Forissuesofgender,anAwouldbeearnedif40percentoftheemployeeswerewomen,Bfor32
percent,Cfor27percent,Dfor22percentandFforanythingbelowthat.However,inthecaseof
womensheadcoachesofwomensteam,itshouldbeexpectedasaminimumthatatleasthalfofthe
positionsareheldbywomen.Thusinthatcategory,50percentwouldearnaB.The40percentisalso
takenfromthefederalaffirmativeactionstandards.TheInstituteonceagainacknowledgesthateven
thosesportswheregradesarelowgenerallyhavebetterrecordsonraceandgenderthansocietyasa
whole.
METHODOLOGY
AlldatawascollectedbyaresearchteamatTheInstituteforDiversityandEthicsinSportinthe
UniversityofCentralFloridasDeVosSchoolofSportBusinessManagement.
BaselinedatawasgatheredfromtheNCAA.Thedatawasplacedinspreadsheetswitheachposition
brokendownbyraceandgender.TheInstitutesresearchteamalsogathereddatafromtheFBSschools
forpresidents,athleticdirectors,footballcoachesandfacultyathleticsrepresentativesaswellas
researchingthediversityoftheconferences.
Thefindingswerecomparedtodatafrompreviousyears.Afterevaluatingthedata,thereporttextwas
draftedandcomparedchangestostatisticsfrompreviousyears.
ThereportdraftwassenttotheNCAAHeadquarterstobereviewedforaccuracy.Inaddition,updates
wererequestedforpersonnelchangesthathadoccurred.TheNCAAwasveryhelpfulwithseveral
changesthathelpedclarifythematerials.
Thereportcoversboththe20082009and20092010academicyearsdependingupontheavailabilityof
dataforparticularpositions.Listingsofpresidents,athleticsdirectors,conferencecommissionersand
associatecommissionersinFootballBowlSubdivision(formerlyknownasDivisionIA)wereupdatedas
ofOctober2010,whilethenamesandwinlossrecordsofheadfootballcoacheswereupdatedasof
November2010inordertoreflectthelatestoffseasoncoachingchanges.
28|P a g e
ABOUTTHERACIALANDGENDERREPORTCARD
Thisisthe18thissueoftheRacialandGenderReportCard(RGRC),whichisthedefinitiveassessmentof
hiringpracticesofwomenandpeopleofcolorinmostoftheleadingprofessionalandamateursports
andsportingorganizationsintheUnitedStates.Thereportconsidersthecompositionassessedby
racialandgendermakeupofplayers,coachesandfrontoffice/athleticdepartmentemployeesinour
countrysleadingsportsorganizations,includingtheNationalBasketballAssociation(NBA),National
FootballLeague(NFL),MajorLeagueBaseball(MLB),MajorLeagueSoccer(MLS)andWomensNational
BasketballAssociation(WNBA),aswellasincollegiateathleticsdepartments.
ThecompleteRacialandGenderReportCard,includingalltheleaguesandcollegesport,willbeissued
nextmonthnowthattheindividualreportsontheNBAandWNBA,NFL,MLB,MLSandcollegesport
havebeenpublished.
TheRacialandGenderReportCardispublishedbyTheInstituteforDiversityandEthicsinSport(TIDES),
whichispartoftheCollegeofBusinessAdministrationattheUniversityofCentralFlorida(UCF)in
Orlando.Dr.RichardLapchickhasauthoredallreports,firstatNortheasternandnowatUCF.(Until
1998,thereportwasknownastheRacialReportCard.)
InstituteforDiversityandEthicsinSport(TIDES)
TheInstituteforDiversityandEthicsinSportservesasacomprehensiveresourceforissuesrelatedto
genderandraceinamateur,collegiateandprofessionalsports.TIDESresearchesandpublishesannual
studiesonhiringpracticesincoachingandsportmanagement,studentathletegraduationratesand
racialattitudesinsports.Additionally,theInstituteconductsdiversitymanagementtraining.The
Institutealsomonitorssomeofthecriticalethicalissuesincollegeandprofessionalsport,includingthe
potentialfortheexploitationofstudentathletes,gambling,performanceenhancingdrugsandviolence
insport.
TheInstitutesfounderanddirectorisDr.RichardLapchick,ascholar,authorandinternationally
recognizedhumanrightsactivistandpioneerforracialequalitywhoisacknowledgedasanexperton
sportsissues.Describedastheracialconscienceofsport,LapchickischairoftheDeVosSportBusiness
ManagementProgramintheCollegeofBusinessAdministrationatUCF,whereTheInstituteislocated.
Inaddition,LapchickservesaspresidentandCEOoftheNationalConsortiumforAcademicsandSports
(NCAS),agroupofmorethan220collegesanduniversitiesthathelpsstudentathletescompletetheir
collegedegreeswhileservingtheircommunitiesonissuessuchasdiversity,conflictresolutionand
mensviolenceagainstwomen.
DeVosSportBusinessManagementProgram
CollegeofBusinessAdministration,UniversityofCentralFlorida
TheDeVosSportBusinessManagementProgramisalandmarkprogramfocusingonbusinessskills
necessaryforgraduatestoconductsuccessfulcareersintherapidlychanginganddynamicsports
industrywhilealsoemphasizingdiversity,communityserviceandsportandsocialissues.Itistheonly
programinabusinesscollegetoofferatwodegreeoption,allowingstudentstoearnaMasterof
BusinessAdministration(MBA)degreeinadditiontotheMasterofSportBusinessManagement(MSBM)
degree.TheprogramwasfundedbyagiftfromtheRichardandHelenDeVosFoundationandRDV
Sports,withmatchingfundsfromtheStateofFlorida.
29|P a g e
APPENDIXI
NCAA Executive/Senior/Vice Presidents
%
2005
2010
Data Not Recorded
White
75.0%
12
African-Am erican
25.0%
Latino
0.0%
White
87.5%
14
Asian
0.0%
African-Am erican
12.5%
Other
0.0%
Latino
0.0%
Wom en
18.8%
Asian
0.0%
16
Other
0.0%
Wom en
18.8%
16
Total
2004
2009
White
83.3%
15
African-Am erican
16.7%
Latino
0.0%
Asian
0.0%
Total
2003
Data Not Recorded
2002
Other
0.0%
White
81.0%
13
Wom en
22.2%
African-Am erican
19.0%
18
Latino
0.0%
Asian
0.0%
0
0
Total
2008
White
83.3%
15
Other
0.0%
African-Am erican
16.7%
Wom en
25.0%
Latino
0.0%
Total
16
Asian
0.0%
Other
0.0%
Wom en
22.2%
18
Total
2001
Data Not Recorded
2000
2007
White
83.3%
10
African-Am erican
16.7%
3
0
White
82.4%
14
Latino
0.0%
African-Am erican
17.6%
Other
0.0%
Latino
0.0%
Wom en
26.7%
15
Asian
0.0%
Other
0.0%
Wom en
Total
1999
Data Not Recorded
23.5%
Total
17
1998
White
81.2%
13
White
81.3%
13
African-Am erican
18.8%
African-Am erican
18.8%
Latino
0.0%
Latino
0.0%
Other
0.0%
Asian
0.0%
Wom en
25.0%
Other
0.0%
Total
16
Wom en
25.0%
16
2006
Total
Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black Institutions excluded.

x= Data not recorded
TABLE 1
30|P a g e
NCAA Managing Directors/Directors

%
White
76.1%
54
African-Am erican
16.9%
12
Latino
4.2%
White
81.3%
33
Asian
2.8%
African-Am erican
12.5%
Other
0.0%
Latino
2.0%
Wom en
2005
2010
Data Not Recorded
2004
45.1%
32
Asian
4.0%
Total
71
Other
0.0%
Wom en
48.0%
20
White
75.7%
53
41
African-Am erican
17.1%
12
Latino
4.3%
Asian
1.4%
2009
Total
2003
Data Not Recorded
2002
Other
1.4%
White
79.0%
Wom en
41.4%
29
African-Am erican
14.0%
Total
70
Latino
5.0%
Asian
2.0%
White
76.5%
52
Other
0.0%
African-Am erican
16.2%
11
Wom en
42.0%
Latino
2.9%
Total
Asian
4.4%
Other
0.0%
Wom en
41.1%
28
68
2008
Total
2007
2001
Data Not Recorded
2000
White
82.9%
34
African-Am erican
9.7%
4
1
White
77.4%
48
Latino
2.4%
African-Am erican
14.5%
Other
4.8%
Latino
1.6%
Wom en
39.0%
16
41
Asian
4.8%
Other
1.6%
Wom en
Total
1999
41.9%
26
Total
62
1998
White
85.7%
36
White
75.9%
44
African-Am erican
7.1%
African-Am erican
Latino
Asian
Other
Wom en
Total
19.0%
1.7%
3.4%
0.0%
41.4%
x
11
1
2
0
24
58
Latino
Other
2.4%
4.8%
1
2
Data Not Recorded
2006

TABLE 2
31|P a g e
NCAA Administrators
%
2010
2005
Data Not Recorded
White
79.1%
151
African-Am erican
16.2%
31
Latino
2.1%
White
76.7%
124
Asian
2.6%
African-Am erican
22.2%
37
Other
0.0%
Latino
0.0%
Wom en
54.5%
104
Asian
1.2%
191
Total
2004
2009
White
78.0%
160
African-Am erican
18.0%
37
Latino
2.0%
Other
0.0%
Wom en
54.3%
88
163
Total
2003
Data Not Recorded
2002
Asian
2.0%
Other
0.0%
White
77.3%
Wom en
53.2%
109
African-Am erican
22.2%
205
Latino
0.0%
Asian
<1%
x
x
Total
2008
White
76.9%
150
Other
0.0%
African-Am erican
19.0%
37
Wom en
54.5%
Latino
2.1%
Total
Asian
2.1%
Other
0.0%
Wom en
54.9%
107
195
Total
2007
2001
Data Not Recorded
2000
White
76.6%
105
African-Am erican
21.9%
30
Latino
0.7%
White
78.4%
145
African-Am erican
18.4%
34
Other
0.7%
Latino
2.2%
Wom en
49.6%
68
Asian
1.1%
137
Other
0.0%
Wom en
55.1%
102
Total
185
White
78.3%
90
White
76.5%
African-Am erican
19.1%
22
African-Am erican
19.7%
Latino
2.6%
Latino
1.1%
Other
0.0%
Asian
1.6%
Wom en
49.2%
53
Other
1.1%
Total
115
Wom en
55.2%
Total
1999
Data Not Recorded
1998
2006
Total
Historically Black Institutions excluded.

TABLE 3
32|P a g e
NCAA Support Staff

%
2005
2010
Data Not Recorded
White
80.8%
97
African-Am erican
16.7%
20
Latino
0.8%
White
85.1%
97
Asian
1.7%
African-Am erican
12.3%
13
2004
Other
0.0%
Latino
0.9%
Wom en
93.3%
112
Asian
1.7%
120
Other
0.0%
Wom en
90.4%
103
113
Total
2009
White
81.0%
98
African-Am erican
16.5%
20
Latino
0.8%
Asian
1.7%
Total
2003
Data Not Recorded
2002
Other
0.0%
Wom en
95.0%
115
White
84.5%
African-Am erican
13.0%
Total
121
Asian
White
80.4%
90
Other
2.5%
African-Am erican
16.1%
18
Wom en
84.0%
Latino
0.0%
Total
Asian
1.8%
Latino
2008
Other
1.8%
Wom en
94.6%
106
112
Total
2007
2001
Data Not Recorded
2000
White
84.0%
100
African-Am erican
13.4%
16
Latino
0.8%
White
80.0%
92
African-Am erican
16.5%
19
Other
1.6%
Latino
0.9%
Wom en
90.7%
108
Asian
1.7%
119
Other
0.9%
Wom en
93.0%
107
Total
115
White
90.5%
105
White
81.6%
African-Am erican
6.9%
African-Am erican
15.8%
Latino
0.0%
Latino
0.9%
Other
2.5%
Asian
1.8%
Wom en
94.8%
110
Other
0.0%
Total
122
Wom en
91.2%
Total
1999
Data Not Recorded
1998
2006
Total

TABLE 4
33|P a g e
Total Full-Time NCAA Staff

%
2010
White
78.7%
314
African-Am erican
16.8%
67
Latino
2.0%
Asian
2.3%
Other
0.0%
Wom en
62.9%
251
Total
399
White
78.7%
326
African-Am erican
17.4%
72
Latino
1.9%
Asian
1.7%
Other
0.2%
Wom en
62.1%
257
Total
414
2009
2008
White
78.1%
307
African-Am erican
17.6%
69
Latino
0.0%
Asian
2.3%
Other
0.5%
Wom en
62.3%
245
Total
393
2007
White
78.9%
299
African-Am erican
17.2%
65
Latino
1.6%
Asian
1.8%
Other
0.5%
Wom en
63.1%
239
379
Total
Note: Data provided by the NCAA.

Data Calculated From Tables 1-4
TABLE 5
34|P a g e
35|P a g e
Associate Conference
Commissioners
Division IA
%
#
45
2009-10
White
86.5%
African-Am erican
9.6%
Asian
0.0%
Latino
1.9%
Native Am erican
0.0%
Other
1.9%
Wom en
34.6%
18
Total
100.0%
52
51
2008-09
White
300.0%
African-Am erican
35.3%
Asian
5.9%
1
0
Latino
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.0%
Other
5.9%
Wom en
100.0%
17
Total
347.1%
59
2007-08
Data Not Recorded
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
Data Not Recorded
2004-05
White
92.3%
48
African-Am erican
5.8%
Asian
1.9%
1
0
Latino
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.0%
Other
0.0%
Wom en
25.0%
13
Total
52
White
82.5%
22
African-Am erican
12.5%
Asian
2.5%
Latino
2.5%
Native Am erican
Other
27.5%
11
40
2003-04
Wom en
Total
Note: Historically Black Institutions excluded.

TABLE 7
36|P a g e
Male Student-Athletes: Division I

Basketball Football Baseball
2009-2010
Basketball Football Baseball

2002-03
White
30.5%
45.1%
83.4%
White
32.3%
49.3%
84.1%
African-Am erican
60.9%
45.8%
5.6%
African-Am erican
57.9%
43.8%
6.1%
Latino
1.9%
2.4%
5.8%
Latino
1.3%
2.2%
5.1%
Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
Asian/ Pacific Islander
0.6%
1.9%
1.3%
Asian
0.2%
1.6%
1.2%
Tw o or More Races
1.2%
1.3%
0.8%
Non-Resident Aliens
5.3%
0.5%
1.2%
Other
4.6%
2.9%
2.6%
Other
2.6%
2.3%
2.0%
2008-09
2001-02
White
31.9%
46.3%
83.9%
White
32.3%
50.1%
83.4%
African-Am erican
60.4%
45.6%
5.7%
African-Am erican
57.7%
42.6%
6.9%
Latino
2.1%
2.6%
5.8%
Latino
1.5%
2.1%
5.2%
0.2%
0.4%
0.5%
0.3%
0.4%
0.4%
0.5%
1.8%
1.4%
Asian
0.2%
1.4%
1.1%
Non-Resident Aliens
N/A
N/A
N/A
Non-Resident Aliens
4.8%
0.5%
1.1%
Tw o or More Races
0.7%
0.5%
0.5%
Other
3.2%
2.8%
1.9%
Other
4.3%
2.8%
2.2%
White
32.5%
49.4%
81.3%
White
32.6%
46.6%
84.4%
African-Am erican
57.1%
42.1%
6.7%
African-Am erican
60.4%
46.4%
6.0%
Latino
1.4%
2.1%
5.6%
Latino
1.8%
2.4%
5.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.9%
2000-01
2007-08
0.1%
0.4%
0.4%
Asian
0.2%
1.3%
Asian
0.4%
0.9%
1.1%
Non-Resident Aliens
5.1%
1.7%
2.1%
Native Haw aiian/Pacific Islander
0.0%
0.9%
0.2%
Other
3.3%
2.9%
3.0%
Tw o or More Races
0.5%
0.3%
0.1%
Other
4.2%
2.3%
2.3%
1999-00
2006-07
White
34.6%
51.3%
83.0%
African-Am erican
55.0%
39.5%
6.6%
4.3%
White
32.5%
47.0%
84.5%
Latino
1.6%
1.8%
African-Am erican
60.4%
45.9%
6.0%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
Latino
1.8%
2.2%
5.4%
Asian
0.3%
1.3%
1.1%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
Non-Resident Aliens
3.0%
0.2%
0.6%
Asian
0.4%
1.6%
1.2%
Other
5.3%
5.7%
3.9%
Other
4.7%
2.9%
2.5%
White
34.0%
46.9%
88.1%
White
29.9%
47.1%
84.6%
African-Am erican
55.9%
46.4%
2.8%
African-Am erican
58.9%
45.4%
5.7%
Latino
1.4%
1.9%
4.7%
Latino
1.8%
2.1%
5.0%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.8%
1998-99
2005-06
0.3%
0.9%
0.4%
Asian
0.3%
2.0%
Asian
0.5%
1.6%
1.1%
Non-Resident Aliens
5.5%
1.0%
1.4%
Non-Resident Aliens
6.2%
2.4%
1.0%
Other
2.6%
1.9%
1.7%
Other
2.3%
0.4%
2.5%
1997 - 98
White
31.9%
47.7%
83.7%
1996-97
African-Am erican
57.8%
45.4%
6.5%
White
33.8%
46.9%
89.5%
Latino
1.5%
2.3%
5.4%
African-Am erican
57.3%
47.6%
3.0%
0.6%
0.3%
0.3%
Latino
1.5%
1.9%
4.3%
Asian
0.4%
1.6%
1.2%
0.2%
0.3%
0.5%
Non-Resident Aliens
5.4%
0.4%
1.0%
Asian
0.3%
1.2%
0.6%
Other
2.5%
2.3%
1.9%
Non-Resident Aliens
4.4%
0.6%
0.9%
Other
2.5%
1.5%
1.2%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
1992 - 96
White
31.6%
48.3%
83.8%
African-Am erican
58.2%
44.3%
6.1%
Latino
1.5%
2.4%
4.9%
0.3%
0.4%
0.3%
White
34.5%
53.2%
90.0%
Asian
0.2%
1.6%
1.2%
African-Am erican
61.8%
42.7%
4.3%
Non-Resident Aliens
5.7%
0.6%
1.3%
Latino
0.8%
1.4%
3.9%
Other
2.5%
2.4%
2.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.3%
Asian
0.2%
1.0%
0.7%
2.5%
1.4%
0.8%
Data Not Recorded
1991-92
Non-Resident Aliens
Other
Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black institutions excluded. Only student-athletes receiving financial aid are included in this
report.
TABLE 8
x=Data not recorded
37|P a g e
Female Student-Athletes: Division I

Basketball
Outdoor
Track
Softball
2009-10
Basketball
Outdoor
Track
Softball
79.4%
2003-04
White
40.2%
59.6%
77.5%
White
46.8%
59.6%
African-Am erican
51.0%
29.1%
7.7%
African-Am erican
41.6%
28.1%
9.1%
Latino
1.5%
4.6%
7.4%
Latino
1.8%
3.2%
5.1%
0.3%
0.4%
0.8%
0.5%
0.4%
0.6%
1.5%
1.3%
2.7%
Asian
1.3%
1.2%
2.1%
Tw o or More Races
1.3%
1.0%
1.6%
Non-Resident Aliens
5.3%
4.3%
1.3%
Other
4.1%
4.5%
2.4%
Other
2.8%
3.2%
2.3%
79.9%
2008-09
2002-03
White
41.1%
60.4%
77.6%
White
48.7%
61.0%
African-Am erican
51.5%
29.1%
7.9%
African-Am erican
40.9%
27.6%
9.1%
Latino
1.6%
3.6%
7.3%
Latino
1.7%
3.0%
4.8%
0.3%
0.4%
0.7%
0.6%
0.4%
0.5%
1.0%
1.4%
2.5%
Asian
1.2%
1.4%
1.9%
Non-Resident Aliens
N/A
N/A
N/A
Non-Resident Aliens
4.5%
3.7%
1.0%
Tw o or More Races
0.7%
0.5%
1.1%
Other
2.4%
3.0%
2.8%
Other
3.8%
4.5%
2.8%
White
50.2%
60.5%
80.7%
White
42.6%
60.2%
78.5%
African-Am erican
39.7%
28.0%
9.0%
African-Am erican
50.1%
29.5%
7.7%
Latino
1.7%
3.0%
4.1%
2001-02
2007-08
Latino
1.3%
3.4%
7.2%
0.5%
0.5%
0.6%
0.3%
0.4%
0.8%
Asian
0.8%
1.0%
1.7%
Asian
1.1%
1.4%
2.0%
Non-Resident Aliens
4.3%
3.6%
1.0%
Native Haw aiian/Pacific Islander
0.2%
0.1%
0.6%
Other
2.8%
3.3%
2.8%
Tw o or More Races
0.5%
0.3%
0.5%
Other
3.9%
4.7%
2.7%
68.9%
2000-01
White
50.6%
58.1%
African-Am erican
38.6%
28.1%
8.4%
78.6%
Latino
1.7%
2.5%
3.1%
2006-07
White
44.4%
60.8%
African-Am erican
47.4%
28.7%
8.5%
0.5%
0.4%
0.3%
Latino
2.0%
3.6%
6.8%
Asian
0.8%
1.0%
3.6%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
Non-Resident Aliens
5.0%
5.7%
6.8%
Asian
1.1%
1.4%
2.3%
Other
2.8%
4.2%
8.9%
Other
4.7%
4.9%
3.2%
White
53.6%
61.9%
80.3%
White
44.3%
60.0%
79.2%
African-Am erican
35.7%
26.8%
8.6%
African-Am erican
44.6%
27.7%
7.8%
Latino
1.5%
2.4%
3.5%
1999-00
2005-06
Latino
1.6%
3.4%
6.7%
0.4%
0.3%
0.6%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
Asian
0.7%
0.8%
1.3%
Asian
1.6%
1.3%
1.9%
Non-Resident Aliens
2.4%
2.1%
0.6%
Non-Resident Aliens
5.2%
4.5%
1.7%
Other
5.6%
5.7%
5.2%
Other
2.4%
2.7%
2.4%
80.6%
2004-05
White
44.6%
59.7%
African-Am erican
43.7%
28.5%
7.9%
Latino
1.6%
3.2%
5.9%
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
Asian
1.3%
1.2%
1.9%
Non-Resident Aliens
5.8%
3.9%
1.2%
Other
2.5%
3.1%
2.0%
Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black institutions excluded. Only student-athletes receiving financial aid are included in this report.
TABLE 9
x=Data not recorded
38|P a g e
Student-Athletes: Division I
Male
Female
2009-10
Male
Female
2002-03
White
62.5%
70.6%
White
62.6%
71.9%
African-Am erican
24.9%
16.0%
African-Am erican
24.6%
14.8%
Latino
4.2%
4.2%
Latino
3.3%
2.9%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander
2.0%
2.4%
Asian
1.6%
2.0%
Tw o or More Races
1.0%
1.1%
Non-Resident Aliens
4.1%
4.5%
Other
5.0%
5.2%
Other
3.4%
3.7%
White
63.8%
71.3%
White
63.1%
72.1%
African-Am erican
24.8%
16.0%
African-Am erican
24.3%
14.7%
Latino
4.0%
3.9%
Latino
3.4%
2.8%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
1.9%
2.4%
Asian
1.5%
1.8%
Tw o or More Races
0.5%
0.7%
Non-Resident Aliens
3.8%
4.2%
Other
4.7%
5.3%
Other
3.7%
3.9%
White
64.3%
71.9%
White
61.6%
70.4%
African-Am erican
25.0%
15.9%
African-Am erican
24.3%
14.8%
Latino
3.9%
3.7%
Latino
3.3%
2.6%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
1.5%
2.5%
Asian
1.4%
1.7%
Tw o or More Races
0.2%
0.3%
Non-Resident Aliens
4.7%
5.4%
Other
4.3%
5.2%
Other
4.4%
4.8%
White
64.2%
72.1%
White
64.4%
72.6%
African-Am erican
24.7%
15.7%
African-Am erican
22.9%
13.8%
Latino
3.8%
3.7%
Latino
2.8%
2.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
0.3%
1.6%
2.3%
Asian
1.4%
1.6%
Other
5.3%
5.8%
Non-Resident Aliens
2.4%
2.4%
Other
5.8%
6.7%
White
61.7%
70.1%
African-Am erican
24.6%
15.1%
White
61.6%
75.8%
Latino
3.6%
3.5%
African-Am erican
25.5%
10.7%
0.6%
0.4%
Latino
3.1%
2.9%
Asian
1.7%
2.2%
0.4%
0.6%
Non-Resident Aliens
4.6%
5.6%
Asian
1.3%
1.6%
Other
3.1%
3.1%
Non-Resident Aliens
6.0%
6.3%
Other
2.0%
2.5%
White
62.2%
70.5%
African-Am erican
24.8%
15.4%
Latino
3.7%
3.3%
0.4%
0.4%
White
62.3%
78.2%
Asian
1.7%
2.2%
African-Am erican
26.2%
11.1%
Non-Resident Aliens
4.1%
4.9%
Latino
3.1%
2.8%
Other
3.1%
3.3%
0.5%
0.5%
Asian
1.6%
1.9%
2008-09
2001-02
2007-08
2000-01
2006-07
1999-00
2005-06
1998-99
2004-05
1997-98
Data Not Recorded
1996-97
2003-04
White
62.3%
70.6%
Non-Resident Aliens
4.5%
3.8%
African-Am erican
24.6%
14.9%
Other
1.8%
1.8%
Latino
3.6%
3.3%
0.4%
0.4%
Asian
1.6%
2.1%
Non-Resident Aliens
4.4%
5.0%
White
66.2%
79.8%
Other
3.2%
3.7%
African-Am erican
26.5%
12.8%
Latino
2.5%
2.2%
0.3%
0.3%
Asian
0.2%
1.5%
1992-96
Data Not Recorded
1991-92
Non-Resident Aliens
Other
4.3%
3.4%
Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black institutions excluded.
TABLE 10
x=Data not recorded
39|P a g e
Historical Listing of African-American and Latino

Division IA Head Football Coaches
Team
Year(s)
Record
Willie Jeffries
Wichita State
21-32-0
Dennis Green
Northw estern
10-45-0
Stanford
16-18-0
Cleve Bryant
Ohio University
9-44-2
Wayne Nunnely
Las Vegas
19-25-0
Francis Peay
Northw estern
13-51-1
Willie Brow n
Long Beach State
2-8-2
Jam es Caldw ell
Wake Forest
26-63-0
Ron Cooper
Eastern Michigan
9-13-0
Louisville
13-20-0
Matt Sim on
University of North Texas
18-26-1
Bob Sim m ons
Oklahoma State
29-37-1
John Blake
Oklahoma
11-21-0
Tony Sam uel
New Mexico State
39-57
Southeast Missouri State
7-20
Jerry Baldw in
Louisiana Lafayette
6-27-0
Bobby William s
Michigan State
12-11-0
Ron Dickerson
Temple
8-47
Fitzgerald Hill
San Jose State
14-32-0
Tyrone Willingham
Stanford
44-36-1
Notre Dame
21-15-0
Washington
11-37
Karl Dorrell
UCLA
35-27
Sylvester Croom
Mississippi State
21-38
Barry Alvarez
Wisconsin
16
118-73-4
Ron Prince
Kansas State
17-20
Turner Gill
Buffalo
20-30
Kansas
3-9
Randy Shannon
Miami
28-22
Mario Cristobal
Florida International
15-32
Ken Nium atalolo
Naval Academy
27-12
Kevin Sum lin
Houston
23-16
DeWayne Walker
New Mexico State
5-20
Ron English
Eastern Michigan
2-22
Mike Hayw ood
Miami (Ohio)
9-15
Mike Locksley
New Mexico
2-22
Charlie Strong
Louisville
6-6
Willie Taggert
Western Kentucky
2-10
Larry Porter
Memphis
1-11
Mike London
Virginia
4-8
Joker Phillips
Kentucky
6-6
Ruffin McNeill
East Carolina
6-6
Don Treadw ell
Michigan State
11-1
TABLE 11
40|P a g e
College Head Coaches: Men's Teams

Basketball
%
#
Football
%
#
Baseball
%
#
Basketball
%
#
Division I
Football
%
#
Baseball
%
#
Division I, II, III
2008-09
2008-09
White 77.3%
93.1%
94.5%
White 85.2%
95.6%
94.1%
African-Am erican 21.0%
5.1%
1.1%
2.6%
1.2%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
70.0%
Latino
0.7%
1.2%
2.6%
Latino
1.0%
0.5%
3.0%
Native Am erican
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.3%
0.2%
Other
0.7%
0.6%
0.2%
Other
0.3%
0.5%
0.3%
White 75.8%
94.0%
95.9%
White 85.1%
95.2%
94.7%
5.1%
0.4%
3.2%
1.0%
2007-08
2007-08
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Asian
0.2%
0.0%
0.8%
Latino
0.7%
0.5%
2.2%
Latino
0.9%
0.5%
2.9%
Native Am erican
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.2%
0.1%
Other
0.3%
0.5%
0.0%
Other
0.2%
0.5%
0.2%
2006-07
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
2005-06
White 73.9%
92.7%
95.9%
White 84.2%
95.4%
95.3%
6.1%
0.5%
3.2%
0.7%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Asian
0.3%
0.0%
0.5%
Latino
0.5%
1.2%
2.6%
Latino
1.0%
0.7%
2.7%
Native Am erican
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.3%
0.0%
0.2%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Other
0.0%
0.5%
0.7%
702
2004-05
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
2003-04
White 76.4%
201
96.0%
179
96.4%
217
61
2.9%
0.9%
0.4%
1.1%
2.7%
Other
2001 -03
White 86.0%
713
97.7%
502
96.2%
102
1.6%
0.7%
1.7%
14
0.8%
3.1%
23
Other
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
2000-01
White 76.7%
96.9%
97.5%
White 86.6%
97.1%
96.8%
2.1%
0.0%
2.0%
0.4%
0.4%
1.0%
2.5%
0.7%
0.9%
2.8%
Other
1999-2000
Other
1999-2000
White 78.0%
95.3%
95.2%
White 85.9%
97.3%
96.0%
4.7%
0.4%
1.8%
0.4%
0.3%
0.0%
4.4%
1.4%
0.9%
3.6%
Other
1998-99
Other
1998-99
Data Not Recorded
Data Not Recorded
1997-98
1997-98
White 79.9%
92.2%
96.7%
White 87.2%
97.0%
96.7%
7.8%
0.4%
2.6%
0.7%
0.7%
0.0%
2.9%
0.6%
0.4%
2.6%
Other
1996-97
Other
1996-97
Data Not Recorded
Data Not Recorded
1995-96
1995-96
White 81.5%
94.4%
97.6%
White 87.3%
96.5%
97.6%
5.6%
0.0%
2.7%
0.8%
1.0%
0.0%
2.4%
1.5%
0.7%
1.6%
Other
Other
TABLE 12
x=Data not recorded
41|P a g e
Women Head Coaches

Men's Sports
%
#
Women's Sports
%
#
2008-09
Division I
2.7%
40.0%
Division II
3.5%
32.9%
Division III
4.6%
39.4%
Division I
2.8%
40.3%
Division II
3.7%
33.1%
Division III
4.8%
43.0%
2007-08
Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black

institutions excluded.
x=Data not recorded
TABLE 13
42|P a g e
College Head Coaches

Division I
Men's
Women's
Sports
Sports
Division II
Men's
Women's
Sports
Sports
Division III
Men's
Women's
Sports
Sports
2008-09
White
89.3%
87.7%
89.2%
89.5%
92.3%
91.9%
African-Am erican
6.6%
7.2%
4.8%
4.8%
3.7%
3.9%
Asian
0.7%
1.1%
0.8%
1.0%
0.7%
1.3%
Latino
1.8%
1.7%
3.3%
2.9%
1.4%
1.3%
Native Am erican
0.3%
0.4%
0.2%
0.1%
0.2%
0.1%
2007-08
White
89.2%
87.7%
88.7%
88.9%
92.5%
91.9%
African-Am erican
7.2%
7.0%
5.3%
5.1%
4.0%
4.4%
Asian
0.9%
1.4%
1.1%
1.3%
0.6%
1.2%
Latino
1.6%
2.1%
3.9%
2.8%
1.5%
1.2%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.1%
0.2%
0.6%
0.2%
0.1%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
90.6%
89.6%
89.5%
89.9%
93.4%
92.9%
African-Am erican
7.3%
6.6%
4.4%
4.3%
4.1%
4.2%
Asian
0.4%
1.1%
0.7%
1.2%
0.6%
1.2%
Latino
1.1%
1.6%
3.6%
2.9%
1.5%
1.3%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.2%
0.6%
0.3%
0.1%
0.0%
TABLE 14
43|P a g e
College Head Coaches: Division I

Men's Sports
Men
%
Women's Sports
Women
#
Men
Women
2008-09
White
87.1%
2.1%
52.8%
34.9%
African-Am erican
6.3%
0.6%
3.9%
3.3%
Asian
0.7%
0.0%
0.7%
0.4%
Latino
1.8%
0.0%
1.2%
0.5%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
0.2%
Other
1.1%
0.0%
1.2%
0.7%
Total
97.1%
2.7%
60.0%
40.0%
2007-08
White
87.1%
2.1%
52.4%
35.3%
African-Am erican
6.5%
0.7%
3.7%
3.3%
Asian
0.9%
0.0%
0.9%
0.5%
Latino
1.6%
0.0%
1.3%
0.8%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Other
0.9%
0.0%
1.1%
0.4%
Total
97.1%
2.8%
59.5%
40.3%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
87.8%
2.8%
54.3%
35.3%
African-Am erican
6.7%
0.6%
3.6%
3.0%
Asian
0.4%
0.0%
0.8%
0.3%
Latino
1.1%
0.0%
1.2%
0.4%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
Other
0.5%
0.1%
0.4%
0.5%
Total
96.6%
3.6%
60.4%
39.6%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
87.6%
2030
1.9%
45
52.5%
1349
38.8%
995
African-Am erican
7.2%
167
0.5%
11
3.4%
106
1.6%
79
Asian
0.5%
12
0.0%
0.9%
23
0.3%
10
Latino
1.4%
33
0.1%
1.3%
26
0.4%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Other
0.6%
14
0.0%
0.6%
17
0.1%
Total
97.4%
2258
2.5%
60
58.7%
1522
41.3%
1100
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
87.4%
2.5%
51.2%
38.1%
African-Am erican
6.9%
0.4%
4.0%
3.2%
Asian
0.1%
0.0%
0.9%
0.4%
Latino
1.4%
0.1%
0.9%
0.5%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Other
0.1%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
3.0%
42.3%
Total Wom en
1999-00
Data Not Recorded
1998-99
White
89.8%
2.0%
52.5%
39.1%
African-Am erican
5.9%
0.1%
3.1%
2.6%
Other
2.2%
0.0%
2.2%
0.4%
0.2%
42.1%
Total Wom en
TABLE 15
x=Data not recorded
44|P a g e
College Head Coaches: Division II

Men
%
Men's Sports
Women
#
%
#
Women's Sports
Men
Women
%
#
%
#
2008-09
White
86.0%
3.2%
59.4%
30.1%
African-Am erican
4.8%
0.0%
3.4%
1.4%
Asian
0.7%
0.1%
0.9%
0.1%
Latino
3.3%
0.1%
2.2%
0.7%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
Other
1.5%
0.1%
1.0%
0.6%
Total
96.5%
3.5%
67.1%
32.9%
2007-08
White
85.2%
3.5%
58.6%
30.3%
African-Am erican
5.3%
0.0%
3.7%
1.4%
Asian
1.0%
0.1%
1.1%
0.2%
Latino
3.8%
0.1%
2.2%
0.6%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.0%
0.3%
0.3%
Other
0.4%
0.0%
0.5%
0.3%
Total
95.9%
3.7%
66.4%
33.1%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
86.6%
2.9%
58.8%
31.1%
African-Am erican
4.2%
0.2%
3.0%
1.3%
Asian
0.6%
0.1%
0.9%
0.3%
Latino
3.5%
0.1%
2.2%
0.7%
Native Am erican
0.6%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
Other
1.1%
0.1%
1.3%
0.1%
Total
96.6%
3.4%
66.5%
33.5%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
87.6%
1369
2.9%
46
57.2%
972
33.6%
571
African-Am erican
3.4%
53
0.0%
3.0%
51
0.7%
12
Asian
0.9%
14
0.0%
0.8%
13
0.2%
Latino
3.8%
59
0.1%
2.2%
37
0.9%
15
Native Am erican
0.3%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
Other
1.0%
15
0.1%
1.1%
18
0.2%
Total
97.0%
1515
3.0%
48
64.5%
1094
35.5%
604
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
88.6%
4.6%
58.4%
34.4%
African-Am erican
3.5%
0.3%
2.5%
1.2%
Asian
0.8%
0.1%
1.0%
0.2%
Latino
1.2%
0.0%
0.7%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Other
0.8%
0.1%
0.9%
0.4%
5.1%
36.5%
Total Wom en
1999-2000
Data Not Recorded
1998-99
White
88.0%
3.2%
58.7%
33.3%
African-Am erican
3.4%
0.2%
2.4%
1.0%
Other
4.6%
0.4%
3.7%
0.7%
3.8%
35.0%
Total Wom en
TABLE 16
x=Data not recorded
45|P a g e
College Head Coaches: Division III

Men
%
Men's Sports
Women
#
%
#
Women's Sports
Men
Women
%
#
%
#
2008-09
White
88.0%
4.3%
55.2%
36.7%
African-Am erican
3.5%
0.2%
2.7%
1.2%
Asian
0.7%
0.0%
0.8%
0.6%
Latino
1.5%
0.0%
1.0%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Other
1.5%
0.1%
0.9%
0.6%
Total
95.4%
4.6%
60.7%
39.4%
2007-08
White
88.0%
4.5%
51.4%
40.5%
African-Am erican
3.8%
0.2%
3.2%
1.2%
Asian
0.6%
0.0%
0.7%
0.5%
Latino
1.5%
0.0%
0.9%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Other
0.9%
0.1%
0.5%
0.5%
Total
95.0%
4.8%
56.8%
43.0%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
89.5%
3.9%
51.6%
41.3%
African-Am erican
3.7%
0.4%
2.9%
1.3%
Asian
0.6%
0.0%
0.8%
0.4%
Latino
1.5%
0.0%
1.1%
0.2%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.3%
0.0%
0.2%
0.2%
Total
95.7%
4.3%
56.6%
43.4%
1379
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
88.9%
2667
4.1%
123
50.9%
1668
42.1%
African-Am erican
3.8%
113
0.3%
3.0%
99
1.0%
33
Asian
0.4%
12
0.0%
0.6%
21
0.4%
12
Latino
1.5%
45
0.0%
1.0%
33
0.2%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
Other
0.7%
21
0.0%
0.5%
16
0.2%
Total
95.5%
2864
4.4%
133
56.2%
1843
43.9%
1436
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
87.4%
5.9%
50.7%
42.7%
African-Am erican
3.5%
0.3%
2.7%
1.3%
Asian
0.4%
0.1%
0.6%
0.2%
Latino
1.5%
0.0%
1.2%
0.4%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Other
0.4%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
6.4%
44.7%
Total Wom en
1999-00
Data Not Recorded
1998-99
White
89.8%
4.1%
49.2%
44.2%
African-Am erican
3.5%
0.1%
2.6%
1.2%
Other
2.4%
0.1%
2.0%
0.8%
4.3%
46.2%
Total Wom en
TABLE 17
x=Data not recorded
46|P a g e
College Head Coaches: Division I Women's Teams

Basketball
Men
%
Cross Country/Track
Women
%
#
Men
%
Women
%
#
All Other Sports

Men
%
Women
%
#
2008-09
White 29.9%
53.9%
67.4%
12.8%
51.5%
42.6%
African-Am erican
3.9%
11.4%
10.3%
5.9%
1.2%
1.1%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.9%
0.6%
Latino
0.3%
0.3%
1.1%
0.3%
1.3%
0.7%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.5%
0.1%
0.1%
Other
0.0%
0.3%
0.2%
0.2%
0.5%
0.4%
Total 34.1%
65.9%
80.2%
19.7%
55.5%
45.5%
2007-08
White 31.9%
53.7%
66.8%
13.1%
52.3%
39.6%
African-Am erican
2.9%
10.7%
10.1%
6.2%
1.4%
0.9%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
Latino
0.3%
0.3%
1.5%
0.9%
1.4%
0.5%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
1.3%
0.5%
Total 35.1%
64.7%
79.2%
20.2%
57.4%
42.1%
2007-06
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White 32.6%
54.0%
69.5%
14.2%
African-Am erican
2.8%
9.3%
8.7%
6.0%
Asian
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
Latino
0.5%
0.0%
1.0%
0.2%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.2%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Total 35.9%
64.3%
79.2%
20.8%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White 29.9%
78
59.4%
155
65.3%
458
15.0%
105
47.1%
813
46.5%
735
African-Am erican
1.9%
7.7%
20
11.0%
77
6.3%
44
1.4%
25
1.1%
15
Asian
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.8%
16
0.4%
Latino
0.4%
0.0%
1.4%
10
0.3%
1.2%
19
0.2%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.8%
16
0.4%
Total 32.6%
85
67.5%
176
78.3%
549
21.7%
152
51.3%
889
48.8%
772
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White 29.2%
57.7%
65.4%
14.6%
50.6%
43.4%
African-Am erican
1.5%
9.9%
10.5%
6.2%
1.7%
0.6%
Asian
0.4%
0.4%
0.5%
0.3%
0.4%
0.1%
Latino
0.7%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.2%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.3%
0.4%
0.1%
68.4%
22.1%
44.2%
Total Wom en
1999-00
Data Not Recorded
1998-99
White 31.3%
59.7%
69.7%
15.1%
48.9%
44.5%
African-Am erican
1.4%
5.9%
8.8%
4.8%
1.3%
1.3%
Other
0.7%
1.0%
1.6%
0.0%
3.4%
0.6%
66.7%
19.9%
46.5%
Total Wom en
Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black institutions excluded
TABLE 18
x=Data not recorded
47|P a g e
College Assistant Coaches: Division I

Men's Sports
Men
Women's Sports
Wom en
Men
Wom en
2008-09
White
70.1%
6.7%
39.9%
38.9%
African-Am erican
16.7%
1.4%
7.3%
6.9%
Asian
0.7%
0.1%
0.9%
0.7%
Latino
2.0%
0.1%
1.4%
0.9%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.2%
Other
1.8%
0.2%
1.7%
1.4%
Total
91.4%
8.5%
51.3%
49.0%
2007-08
White
71.3%
5.6%
39.3%
39.8%
African-Am erican
16.5%
1.2%
6.7%
6.8%
Asian
0.6%
0.1%
1.0%
0.8%
Latino
1.7%
0.2%
1.7%
1.0%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
Other
1.4%
0.1%
1.5%
0.9%
Total
91.6%
7.2%
50.3%
49.4%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
72.6%
6.6%
39.3%
42.3%
African-Am erican
16.3%
1.3%
6.3%
6.9%
Asian
0.6%
0.2%
1.2%
0.9%
Latino
1.4%
0.1%
1.1%
0.6%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
Other
0.7%
0.1%
0.5%
0.7%
Total
91.7%
8.4%
48.5%
51.5%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
72.3%
3875
5.9%
319
39.5%
1772
41.4%
1861
African-Am erican
16.9%
905
1.3%
69
5.9%
267
7.4%
331
Asian
0.7%
38
0.1%
1.1%
49
1.0%
45
Latino
1.7%
92
0.1%
1.2%
56
0.8%
34
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.1%
0.2%
0.2%
Other
0.7%
36
0.1%
0.6%
28
0.8%
37
Total
92.4%
4954
7.6%
408
48.5%
2179
51.5%
2312
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
73.0%
5.5%
40.7%
40.0%
African-Am erican
16.5%
1.3%
6.8%
7.4%
Asian
0.6%
0.1%
1.2%
0.6%
Latino
1.8%
0.1%
1.4%
0.7%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
Other
0.6%
0.1%
0.5%
0.5%
7.2%
49.3%
Total Wom en
1999-2000
White
74.2%
6.0%
39.1%
43.8%
African-Am erican
15.2%
1.4%
5.5%
7.5%
Other
3.0%
0.2%
2.6%
1.5%
7.6%
52.4%
Total Wom en
TABLE 19
x=Data not recorded.
48|P a g e
College Assistant Coaches: Division II

Men's Sports
Men
Women's Sports
Men
Wom en
Wom en
2008-09
White
72.7%
6.8%
40.0%
41.8%
African-Am erican
12.4%
0.9%
5.5%
4.2%
Asian
0.7%
0.1%
0.9%
0.5%
Latino
4.0%
0.4%
2.8%
1.8%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
Other
1.6%
0.2%
1.1%
1.2%
Total
91.6%
8.5%
50.3%
49.7%
2007-08
White
72.8%
6.2%
39.9%
41.3%
African-Am erican
13.5%
0.7%
6.2%
4.1%
Asian
0.3%
0.1%
0.8%
0.7%
Latino
3.6%
0.6%
2.8%
2.0%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.2%
0.1%
0.2%
Other
0.7%
0.1%
0.4%
0.6%
Total
91.0%
7.9%
50.2%
48.9%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
75.2%
7.5%
39.2%
43.2%
African-Am erican
11.0%
0.6%
4.8%
4.6%
Asian
0.6%
0.0%
0.5%
0.8%
Latino
3.8%
0.2%
2.8%
1.9%
Native Am erican
0.3%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
Other
0.7%
0.1%
1.0%
0.9%
Total
91.6%
8.4%
48.6%
51.4%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
76.4%
1889
6.1%
152
39.9%
748
43.4%
814
African-Am erican
11.0%
273
0.5%
12
4.3%
81
3.8%
71
Asian
0.8%
19
0.0%
1.2%
23
0.5%
Latino
2.9%
72
0.7%
14
2.9%
55
1.8%
34
Native Am erican
0.3%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
Other
1.3%
31
0.1%
1.4%
26
0.6%
12
Total
92.7%
2291
7.4%
182
49.8%
935
50.2%
942
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
79.6%
6.3%
41.5%
45.2%
African-Am erican
9.6%
0.3%
4.6%
3.1%
Asian
1.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.6%
Latino
2.3%
0.0%
1.6%
0.7%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Other
0.8%
0.1%
0.7%
0.9%
6.6%
50.5%
Total Wom en
1999-2000
White
78.4%
5.4%
42.3%
44.2%
African-Am erican
9.8%
0.5%
3.6%
3.3%
Other
5.5%
0.6%
4.3%
2.4%
6.7%
49.5%
Total Wom en
TABLE 20
49|P a g e
College Assistant Coaches: Division III

Men's Sports
Men
Women's Sports
Wom en
Men
Wom en
2008-09
White
79.3%
8.0%
43.4%
45.5%
African-Am erican
7.6%
0.5%
4.0%
1.9%
Asian
0.5%
0.1%
0.6%
0.4%
Latino
1.9%
0.1%
1.3%
0.7%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
1.7%
0.1%
1.1%
0.8%
Total
91.1%
8.8%
50.4%
49.3%
2007-08
White
80.3%
7.8%
43.0%
45.8%
African-Am erican
7.9%
0.4%
4.2%
2.2%
Asian
0.4%
0.1%
0.6%
0.4%
Latino
1.4%
0.1%
1.1%
0.5%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
1.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.6%
Total
91.0%
8.4%
49.8%
49.5%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
79.9%
8.6%
40.6%
49.9%
African-Am erican
7.3%
1.0%
3.8%
2.7%
Asian
0.5%
0.1%
0.6%
0.4%
Latino
1.8%
0.2%
0.8%
0.6%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Other
0.5%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
Total
90.0%
10.0%
46.0%
54.0%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
81.1%
4124
7.8%
393
41.6%
1737
49.2%
2054
African-Am erican
7.8%
398
0.7%
38
4.3%
178
2.3%
97
Asian
0.5%
27
0.0%
0.6%
24
0.4%
15
Latino
1.4%
73
0.1%
0.8%
32
0.4%
16
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Other
0.5%
24
0.0%
0.3%
14
0.2%
Total
91.4%
4649
8.6%
438
47.6%
1985
52.5%
2194
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
82.4%
7.1%
43.5%
46.6%
African-Am erican
7.2%
0.8%
4.7%
2.7%
Asian
0.5%
0.0%
0.5%
0.3%
Latino
1.6%
0.0%
0.7%
0.4%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
Other
0.3%
0.0%
0.3%
0.1%
7.9%
50.2%
White
81.6%
7.1%
42.8%
47.3%
African-Am erican
8.0%
0.5%
4.9%
2.4%
Other
2.7%
0.1%
1.7%
1.0%
7.7%
50.7%
Total Wom en
1999-2000
Total Wom en
TABLE 21
50|P a g e
College Assistant Coaches: Division I Men's Teams

Men
Basketball
Women
Football
Men
Baseball
Women
Men
Women
2008-09
White
59.1%
0.0%
78.3%
0.4%
92.1%
0.4%
African-Am erican
39.5%
0.0%
17.6%
0.1%
1.2%
0.0%
Asian
0.2%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
Latino
0.7%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
3.6%
0.0%
Native-Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
Other
0.4%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
Total
99.9%
0.0%
99.5%
0.5%
99.6%
0.4%
2007-08
White
58.8%
0.0%
72.5%
0.3%
93.0%
1.0%
African-Am erican
39.3%
0.0%
23.8%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
Asian
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
Latino
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
0.0%
Native-Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
Total
99.7%
0.0%
96.3%
0.3%
99.3%
1.0%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
62.4%
0.1%
73.4%
1.4%
92.7%
0.7%
African-Am erican
35.7%
0.1%
22.9%
0.3%
1.6%
0.0%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.1%
0.7%
0.0%
Latino
1.2%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
Native-Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.4%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
Total
99.7%
0.2%
98.3%
1.8%
99.2%
0.7%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
62.4%
497
0.0%
73.5%
1155
0.0%
96.1%
481
0.0%
African-Am erican
36.4%
290
0.0%
24.4%
383
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
11
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
Latino
0.8%
0.0%
0.6%
10
0.0%
2.8%
14
0.0%
Native-Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.4%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
Total
100.0%
796
0.0%
100.0%
1572
0.0%
100.0%
501
0.0%
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
65.0%
0.2%
74.6%
0.5%
95.7%
0.2%
African-Am erican
33.4%
0.0%
22.7%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
Latino
1.2%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
1.8%
0.2%
Native-Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.1%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.2%
0.5%
0.4%
White
63.8%
1.4%
77.3%
0.1%
94.8%
0.4%
African-Am erican
32.9%
0.2%
20.4%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
Other
1.6%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
3.8%
0.6%
1.6%
0.1%
1.0%
Total Wom en
1999-2000
Total Wom en
TABLE 22
51|P a g e
College Assistant Coaches: Men's Teams Divisions I, II, and III

Men
%
Basketball
Women
#
%
#
Football
Men
%
Baseball
Women
%
#
Men
%
Women
%
#
2008-09
White
69.5%
0.5%
78.3%
0.4%
92.4%
0.5%
African-Am erican
26.8%
0.0%
17.6%
0.1%
1.4%
0.0%
x
x
Asian
0.4%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
Latino
1.5%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
Native-Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
Other
0.8%
0.0%
1.3%
0.4%
1.3%
0.0%
Total
99.1%
0.5%
99.1%
0.9%
99.5%
0.5%
x
x
2007-08
White
68.2%
0.5%
80.1%
0.1%
92.7%
0.0%
African-Am erican
28.1%
0.0%
17.6%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
Asian
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
Latino
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%
Native-Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
Other
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
Total
99.6%
0.5%
97.7%
0.1%
99.5%
0.0%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
72.1%
0.6%
79.5%
1.3%
93.3%
0.4%
African-Am erican
25.0%
0.2%
16.6%
0.3%
2.0%
0.0%
Asian
0.2%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
Latino
1.6%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
3.5%
0.0%
Native-Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Other
0.3%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
Total 98.3%
0.8%
98.4%
1.6%
99.6%
0.4%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
72.1%
1356
0.2%
80.9%
2956
0.0%
94.7%
1285
0.0%
African-Am erican
26.2%
493
0.0%
17.0%
621
0.0%
1.5%
20
0.0%
Asian
0.2%
0.0%
0.6%
21
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
Latino
1.0%
19
0.0%
0.8%
31
0.0%
3.0%
41
0.0%
Native-Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Other
0.4%
Total 99.8%
0.0%
0.5%
18
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
1879
0.2%
100.0%
3655
0.0%
100.0%
1357
0.0%
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
72.5%
0.6%
81.8%
0.4%
95.3%
0.1%
African-Am erican
24.5%
0.1%
15.7%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
Asian
0.4%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
Latino
1.6%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2.1%
0.1%
Native-Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
Other
0.3%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.7%
0.4%
0.2%
White
72.1%
1.0%
82.7%
0.1%
93.6%
0.4%
African-Am erican
24.3%
0.2%
14.9%
0.1%
1.5%
0.0%
Other
2.4%
0.1%
2.3%
0.0%
4.5%
0.0%
1.3%
0.2%
0.4%
Total Wom en
1999-2000
Total Wom en
Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black Institutions excluded
TABLE 23
52|P a g e
College Assistant Coaches: Division I Women's Teams

Basketball
Men
%
Cross Country/ Track
Women
Men
All Other Sports
Women
Men
Women
#
2008-09
White 18.8%
40.7%
46.4%
24.3%
36.3%
50.6%
26.8%
14.2%
9.0%
2.4%
2.0%
Asian
0.2%
0.4%
0.2%
0.0%
1.5%
1.2%
Latino
0.5%
0.7%
2.2%
1.1%
1.3%
1.0%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
Other
0.7%
0.3%
1.1%
1.3%
1.7%
1.9%
Total
31.0%
69.0%
64.1%
35.9%
43.2%
56.8%
2007-08
White 21.3%
42.7%
53.6%
19.5%
38.9%
49.3%
African-Am erican
8.2%
24.8%
13.5%
6.8%
0.9%
0.8%
Asian
0.1%
0.7%
0.5%
0.5%
2.1%
0.8%
Latino
0.4%
0.8%
2.0%
0.7%
2.1%
1.1%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
Other
0.2%
0.2%
1.8%
0.4%
2.1%
1.2%
Total
30.4%
69.2%
71.5%
28.1%
46.1%
53.3%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White 23.3%
42.9%
African-Am erican
7.6%
24.2%
Asian
0.5%
0.5%
Latino
0.5%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.2%
0.2%
Total
32.1%
68.1%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White 22.5%
170
46.0%
347
52.3%
761
20.9%
305
36.5%
841
53.0%
1209
African-Am erican
6.4%
48
22.4%
169
12.8%
186
9.0%
131
1.4%
33
1.4%
31
Asian
0.3%
0.7%
0.5%
0.2%
1.7%
40
1.6%
37
Latino
0.3%
0.5%
1.9%
27
0.6%
1.2%
27
0.9%
21
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.4%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
0.8%
12
0.9%
20
1.0%
22
Total
30.0%
226
70.0%
528
68.2%
992
31.8%
463
47.1%
961
57.9%
1321
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White 22.5%
45.7%
73.7%
20.6%
42.3%
47.9%
African-Am erican
5.1%
24.3%
22.0%
7.4%
2.3%
1.5%
Asian
0.4%
0.3%
1.0%
0.2%
0.6%
0.2%
Latino
0.3%
0.4%
0.7%
0.3%
1.2%
0.4%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.3%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.7%
0.9%
0.4%
0.1%
0.1%
71.7%
28.9%
50.1%
Total Wom en
1999-2000
20.3%
49.0%
52.6%
23.0%
37.7%
55.7%
African-Am erican
4.4%
23.9%
12.3%
7.9%
1.5%
1.3%
Other
0.0%
2.4%
3.1%
1.1%
3.3%
0.6%
75.3%
32.0%
57.6%
White
Total Wom en
TABLE 24
53|P a g e
College Athletics Directors: Division I

Men
%
Women
#
2008-09
White
81.8%
7.0%
African-Am erican
6.7%
0.7%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
Latino
1.9%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.6%
0.3%
Other
0.7%
0.0%
Total
91.7%
8.3%
2007-08
White
83.8%
6.2%
African-Am erican
6.2%
1.0%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
Latino
1.6%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.3%
0.3%
Other
0.3%
0.0%
Total
92.2%
7.8%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
85.8%
7.3%
African-Am erican
5.0%
0.5%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
Latino
0.9%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.5%
0.0%
Total
92.2%
7.8%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
88.5%
232
6.5%
17
African-Am erican
3.4%
0.0%
Asian
0.0%
0.4%
Latino
1.2%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.4%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
Total
92.7%
243
7.3%
19
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
88.4%
6.9%
African-Am erican
2.9%
0.0%
Asian
0.4%
0.0%
Latino
1.1%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.4%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
Total
92.8%
7.2%
White
1999-2000
86.9%
9.0%
African-Am erican
2.4%
0.0%
Other
1.7%
0.0%
Total
91.0%
9.0%
Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black Institutions

excluded.
TABLE 25
54|P a g e
College Athletics Directors: Division II

Men
Women
2008-09
White
78.8%
13.9%
African-Am erican
2.3%
0.8%
Asian
0.0%
0.8%
Latino
3.1%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.3%
0.0%
Total
84.5%
15.5%
2007-08
White
78.0%
14.0%
African-Am erican
3.0%
0.8%
Asian
0.0%
0.8%
Latino
3.0%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.4%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
Total
84.4%
15.6%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
74.7%
17.6%
African-Am erican
3.3%
0.5%
Asian
0.0%
0.5%
Latino
2.7%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.5%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
Total
81.3%
18.7%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
79.6%
187
14.5%
34
African-Am erican
1.3%
0.9%
Asian
0.0%
0.9%
Latino
2.6%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.4%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
Total
83.8%
197
16.2%
38
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
82.4%
12.9%
African-Am erican
1.9%
0.5%
Asian
0.0%
0.5%
Latino
1.0%
0.5%
Native Am erican
0.5%
0.0%
Other
0.5%
0.0%
Total
86.3%
14.4%
White
79.6%
13.7%
African-Am erican
1.6%
1.2%
Other
3.5%
0.4%
Total
15.3%
1999-2000

excluded.
TABLE 26
55|P a g e
College Athletics Directors: Division III

Men
%
Women
%
#
2008-09
White
70.0%
26.2%
African-Am erican
1.8%
0.4%
Asian
0.2%
0.4%
Latino
0.4%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.4%
Total
72.6%
27.4%
2007-08
White
70.8%
26.2%
African-Am erican
1.6%
0.2%
Asian
0.2%
0.5%
Latino
0.0%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.2%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
Total
72.8%
27.1%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
69.5%
26.6%
African-Am erican
1.9%
0.0%
Asian
0.3%
0.3%
Latino
0.3%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.6%
0.3%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
Total
72.7%
27.3%
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
68.6%
258
26.9%
African-Am erican
3.2%
12
0.0%
101
0
Asian
0.3%
0.3%
Latino
0.5%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.3%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
Total
72.9%
274
27.1%
102
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
69.3%
23.9%
African-Am erican
4.5%
0.6%
Asian
0.3%
0.6%
Latino
0.3%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.3%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
Total
74.7%
25.4%
White
1999-2000
71.3%
24.3%
African-Am erican
3.0%
0.5%
Other
0.7%
0.2%
Total
25.0%

excluded.
TABLE 27
56|P a g e
College Senior Athletic Administrators: Associate and Assistant Athletics Directors

Division I
Men
%
Division II
Women
%
#
2008-2009
Division III
Men
Women
%
#
%
#
Associate Athletic Directors
Men
%
Women
%
#
White
62.3%
26.2%
48.4%
34.4%
49.0%
43.6%
African-Am erican
5.3%
2.9%
8.1%
6.3%
3.3%
2.1%
Asian
0.4%
0.3%
0.5%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
Latino
0.8%
1.0%
0.5%
0.5%
0.4%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.3%
0.5%
0.5%
0.3%
1.2%
0.4%
Total
69.2%
31.1%
58.0%
42.0%
53.9%
46.1%
Assistant Athletic Directors

White
63.8%
24.5%
52.6%
32.1%
53.9%
37.6%
African-Am erican
5.6%
2.6%
5.1%
4.7%
3.9%
1.3%
Asian
0.3%
0.6%
1.4%
0.3%
0.2%
0.0%
Latino
1.1%
0.8%
2.2%
0.5%
1.9%
0.2%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.6%
0.0%
0.6%
0.2%
0.6%
0.0%
Total
71.5%
28.5%
61.9%
38.1%
60.5%
39.1%
2007-08

White
63.6%
25.6%
53.2%
35.6%
46.4%
50.0%
African-Am erican
Asian
6.2%
0.2%
x
x
1.0%
0.4%
x
x
4.3%
0.5%
x
x
3.2%
0.5%
x
x
2.4%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
x
x
Latino
1.4%
0.8%
1.1%
0.5%
0.4%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.1%
0.1%
0.5%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
Total
71.6%
27.9%
59.6%
40.3%
49.2%
50.8%

White
65.5%
22.7%
56.9%
34.6%
53.9%
37.6%
African-Am erican
6.1%
2.5%
2.4%
2.4%
3.9%
1.3%
Asian
0.1%
0.5%
0.9%
0.3%
0.2%
0.0%
Latino
1.4%
0.8%
0.6%
0.6%
1.9%
0.2%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.1%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
Total
73.2%
26.5%
61.1%
38.2%
60.5%
39.1%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06

White
63.5%
26.0%
48.5%
45.5%
46.2%
49.1%
African-Am erican
Asian
6.1%
0.1%
x
x
2.1%
0.1%
x
x
2.0%
1.0%
x
x
2.0%
0.0%
x
x
2.4%
0.6%
x
x
1.2%
0.0%
x
x
Latino
0.9%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.3%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Total
71.6%
28.4%
51.3%
48.7%
50.3%
49.7%

White
66.3%
22.6%
56.6%
33.6%
58.2%
32.9%
African-Am erican
5.1%
3.6%
3.3%
1.3%
4.6%
2.3%
Asian
0.5%
0.2%
0.7%
0.7%
0.3%
0.3%
Latino
0.9%
0.3%
2.0%
1.3%
1.0%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Other
0.2%
0.3%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
Total
72.9%
27.1%
60.8%
39.2%
64.3%
35.7%
White
62.6%
943
27.3%
411
55.2%
185
34.0%
114
51.8%
259
42.6%
213
African-Am erican
6.0%
91
1.9%
29
2.7%
2.1%
3.4%
17
1.0%
Asian
Latino
0.3%
0.7%
5
11
0.1%
0.5%
3
8
0.3%
3.0%
1
10
0.3%
1.2%
1
4
0.0%
0.4%
0
2
0.2%
0.2%
1
1
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.1%
0.4%
0.9%
0.3%
0.4%
0.0%
Total
69.7%
1051
30.2%
456
62.1%
208
37.9%
127
56.0%
280
44.0%
220
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
63.0%
27.6%
57.8%
33.3%
49.6%
44.2%
African-Am erican
5.3%
1.8%
3.3%
1.6%
3.5%
1.3%
Asian
0.3%
0.1%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Latino
0.9%
0.6%
1.7%
0.7%
0.3%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
1.0%
0.2%
Other
0.0%
0.3%
0.5%
0.3%
0.5%
0.0%
Total
30.4%
36.2%
46.0%
White
1999-2000
63.7%
27.0%
59.5%
33.2%
52.8%
42.0%
African-Am erican
5.9%
1.5%
1.7%
1.3%
2.7%
1.6%
Other
1.2%
0.8%
2.7%
1.7%
0.2%
0.7%
Total
29.3%
36.2%
44.3%
TABLE 28
57|P a g e
Senior Woman Administrators

Division I
Men
%
Division II
Women
%
#
Men
%
Division III
Women
%
#
Men
%
Women
%
#
2008-09
White
0.0%
85.1%
0.0%
81.1%
0.0%
93.7%
African-Am erican
0.0%
10.1%
0.0%
15.4%
0.0%
4.2%
Asian
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.2%
Latino
0.0%
2.3%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.9%
Native Am erican
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.2%
Other
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.8%
Total
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
x
x
2007-08
White
1.0%
84.9%
1.6%
85.3%
0.0%
96.6%
African-Am erican
0.3%
10.2%
0.8%
7.8%
0.0%
1.9%
Asian
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
Latino
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
1.0%
Native Am erican
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Other
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
Total
1.3%
98.3%
2.4%
96.6%
0.0%
100.0%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
1.4%
84.3%
0.6%
90.6%
1.1%
95.7%
African-Am erican
0.5%
10.2%
0.0%
5.3%
0.0%
2.2%
Asian
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Latino
0.5%
1.4%
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
0.4%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.4%
Total
2.3%
97.7%
0.6%
99.4%
1.1%
98.9%
312
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
0.4%
88.5%
224
0.0%
92.6%
201
1.2%
95.4%
African-Am erican
0.0%
8.3%
21
0.0%
4.6%
10
0.0%
2.4%
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.3%
Latino
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2.3%
0.0%
0.6%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Total
0.4%
99.6%
252
0.0%
100.0%
217
1.2%
98.8%
323
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
0.7%
89.6%
0.5%
91.2%
1.1%
93.7%
African-Am erican
0.7%
6.3%
0.0%
5.7%
0.0%
3.2%
Asian
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Latino
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
1.4%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Total
1.8%
98.2%
0.5%
99.5%
1.1%
99.1%
White
1999-2000
1.5%
91.0%
1.0%
90.4%
0.0%
94.7%
African-Am erican
0.0%
6.0%
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%
3.3%
Other
0.4%
1.1%
1.4%
2.9%
0.0%
2.0%
Total
1.9%
98.1%
2.4%
97.6%
0.0%
100.0%
TABLE 29
58|P a g e
Faculty Athletics Representatives

Division IA (FBS)
Men
%
Women
%
#
Division I
Men
%
Division II
Women
%
#
Men
%
Division III
Women
%
#
Men
%
Women
%
#
2009-10
White 64.5%
80
29.0%
36
African-Am erican
3.2%
2.4%
Asian
0.8%
0.0%
Latino
0.0%
0.0%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
Total
68.5%
85
31.5%
39
Data Not Recorded
2008-09
White 66.4%
81
27.0%
33
60.4%
24.0%
65.9%
20.5%
62.6%
31.6%
African-Am erican
4.1%
0.0%
9.2%
3.0%
8.5%
1.4%
3.0%
0.6%
Asian
0.8%
0.0%
0.9%
0.6%
0.3%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
Latino
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
1.7%
0.7%
0.8%
0.2%
Native Am erican
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.6%
0.3%
0.2%
0.0%
Total
73.0%
122
27.0%
33
72.3%
27.9%
77.0%
22.9%
67.6%
32.4%
2007-08
White 65.3%
81
27.4%
34
67.9%
23.8%
70.6%
21.8%
61.9%
32.6%
African-Am erican
4.0%
0.0%
4.1%
1.0%
2.7%
0.8%
2.7%
0.2%
Asian
1.6%
0.0%
1.0%
0.6%
0.8%
0.0%
0.6%
0.2%
Latino
0.8%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
1.9%
0.8%
0.8%
0.2%
Native Am erican
0.8%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
Total
72.6%
90
27.4%
34
73.9%
25.4%
76.0%
23.4%
66.4%
33.2%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
White
71.2%
21.2%
66.5%
25.7%
64.7%
30.8%
African-Am erican
2.2%
0.9%
1.7%
1.7%
2.0%
0.3%
Asian
1.3%
0.4%
0.6%
0.0%
0.6%
0.3%
1.3%
0.0%
2.8%
0.6%
0.6%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.4%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
Total
77.4%
22.6%
72.1%
27.9%
68.4%
31.6%
Latino
Data Not Recorded
2004-05
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
70.9%
188
21.1%
56
71.9%
164
20.6%
47
68.8%
256
26.9%
100
African-Am erican
4.2%
11
0.8%
1.3%
0.4%
3.0%
11
0.3%
Asian
1.1%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
1.8%
1.8%
0.5%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.8%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
Total
78.2%
207
21.9%
58
77.2%
176
22.8%
52
72.6%
270
27.5%
102
Latino
Data Not Recorded
2001-03
Data Not Recorded
2000-01
White
73.2%
18.1%
77.9%
17.3%
67.0%
27.8%
African-Am erican
5.1%
1.1%
1.0%
0.5%
3.1%
0.6%
Asian
1.1%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.5%
0.9%
0.3%
Native Am erican
0.4%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Total
19.6%
18.3%
28.7%
White
75.6%
18.1%
78.0%
15.5%
67.9%
27.8%
Latino
Data Not Recorded
1999-2000
3.1%
1.4%
1.2%
0.4%
1.8%
0.3%
Other
1.7%
0.0%
3.3%
1.6%
2.3%
0.0%
Total
17.6%
28.1%
African-Am erican
Data Not Recorded
Note: Data provided by the NCAA with exception of 2009-10 Data which is provided by TIDES Leadership Study. Historically Black Institutions excluded
TABLE 30
59|P a g e
Sports Information Director

Division I
Men
Women
Division II
Men
Women
Division III
Men
Women
2008-09
White
85.1%
10.3%
80.1%
8.2%
81.7%
13.0%
Black
1.1%
0.3%
5.3%
2.8%
3.5%
0.2%
Asian
1.1%
0.3%
1.4%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
Hispanic
1.6%
0.3%
1.8%
0.0%
0.7%
0.5%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other Minority
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
White
84.8%
10.2%
83.4%
10.0%
81.2%
13.8%
Black
0.3%
0.6%
2.7%
0.8%
1.9%
0.5%
2007-08
Asian
1.7%
0.3%
1.5%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
Hispanic
1.9%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.9%
0.5%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Other Minority
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
TABLE 31
60|P a g e
College Professional Administration by Division

Division I
Division II
Division III
All Divisions
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
Men
Women
White
48.5%
35.2%
46.5%
36.0%
49.1%
42.9%
49.6%
38.1%
African-Am erican
6.2%
4.6%
6.7%
5.1%
2.8%
1.7%
4.3%
2.9%
2008-09
Asian
0.8%
0.7%
0.8%
0.4%
0.5%
0.5%
0.7%
0.6%
Latino
1.3%
1.4%
1.5%
1.3%
0.8%
0.6%
1.3%
1.2%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
Other
0.7%
0.5%
0.8%
0.6%
0.4%
0.4%
0.6%
0.5%
Total
57.5%
42.5%
56.4%
43.5%
53.7%
46.2%
56.6%
43.4%
2007-08
White
56.7%
29.7%
59.4%
29.2%
56.2%
36.6%
56.9%
31.2%
African-Am erican
5.3%
3.4%
4.2%
2.1%
3.2%
1.0%
4.7%
2.7%
Asian
0.8%
0.6%
1.2%
0.5%
0.3%
0.4%
0.7%
0.5%
Latino
1.7%
1.0%
1.7%
0.7%
1.1%
0.6%
1.5%
0.9%
Native Am erican
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
Other
0.2%
0.2%
0.3%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.2%
0.1%
Total
64.7%
34.9%
66.9%
32.7%
61.0%
38.8%
64.1%
35.4%
2004-07
Data Not Recorded
2003-04
White
60.40%
27.50%
55.20%
34.00%
51.80%
42.60%
61.80%
27.60%
African-Am erican
5.90%
2.30%
2.70%
2.30%
3.40%
1.00%
5.10%
1.80%
Asian
0.60%
0.30%
0.60%
0.30%
Latino
1.10%
0.80%
1.20%
0.70%
Native Am erican
0.04%
0.01%
0.10%
0.10%
Other
0.40%
0.60%
4.20%
1.50%
1.10%
0.90%
0.40%
0.30%
Total 68.44%
31.51%
62.10%
37.80%
56.30%
44.50%
69.20%
30.80%
White
63.0%
27.6%
57.8%
33.3%
49.6%
44.2%
61.1%
28.0%
African-Am erican
5.3%
1.8%
3.3%
1.6%
3.5%
1.3%
5.0%
1.9%
2000-01
Other
1.5%
0.8%
2.8%
1.3%
1.0%
0.5%
2.4%
1.6%
Total
69.8%
30.2%
63.9%
36.2%
54.1%
46.0%
68.5%
31.5%
1999-2000
White
62.6%
24.8%
59.5%
33.2%
52.8%
42.0%
64.3%
24.5%
African-Am erican
6.2%
2.8%
1.7%
1.3%
2.7%
1.6%
5.2%
2.1%
Other
2.3%
1.3%
2.7%
1.7%
0.2%
0.7%
2.5%
1.3%
Total
71.1%
28.9%
63.9%
36.2%
55.7%
44.3%
72.0%
27.9%

TABLE 32
61|P a g e
College Professional Administration by Position

Division I
White
Men Women
Black
Men Women
Asian
Men Women
Hispanic
Native American
Men Women Men Women
Other Minority
Men Women
2008-09
Academ ic Advisor/Counselor
25.4%
47.6%
10.7%
10.2%
0.3%
0.8%
1.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.1%
1.1%
1.4%
Business Mgr.
40.0%
46.1%
3.8%
3.8%
0.2%
0.9%
1.1%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.8%
Com pliance Coordinator/Officer
42.0%
44.3%
3.6%
5.3%
0.2%
0.5%
0.9%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.6%
Equipm ent Mgr.
75.8%
10.3%
6.1%
0.8%
1.6%
0.5%
4.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
Fundraiser/Developm ent Mgr.
58.3%
31.8%
5.1%
1.7%
0.3%
0.6%
0.8%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.1%
Facility Mgr.
77.6%
9.8%
7.5%
1.1%
0.8%
0.3%
2.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.2%
Life Skills Coordinator
16.6%
60.6%
8.3%
11.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.7%
Prom otions/Marketing Mgr.
59.5%
31.0%
3.5%
1.8%
0.9%
0.4%
0.7%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.6%
Sports Inform ation director
85.1%
10.3%
1.1%
0.3%
1.1%
0.3%
1.6%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Asst. or Assoc. SID
70.7%
22.5%
0.8%
1.1%
1.2%
0.8%
1.1%
0.6%
0.1%
0.0%
0.7%
0.3%
Strength Coaches
74.0%
10.7%
10.3%
1.1%
0.8%
0.1%
1.3%
0.2%
0.1%
0.0%
1.0%
0.2%
Ticket Manager
54.7%
38.4%
3.2%
1.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
23.8%
49.1%
11.5%
10.0%
0.2%
0.8%
1.3%
1.7%
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
0.5%
2007-08
Business Mgr.
39.3%
48.2%
2.7%
3.6%
0.5%
1.1%
1.6%
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
39.5%
45.6%
4.2%
6.1%
0.0%
0.8%
1.1%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Equipm ent Mgr.
75.3%
9.9%
6.3%
0.7%
1.4%
0.3%
5.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
59.0%
31.2%
5.1%
1.8%
0.6%
0.7%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.3%
Facility Mgr.
74.4%
10.4%
7.2%
0.8%
1.2%
0.5%
3.7%
0.6%
0.2%
0.0%
0.2%
0.2%
15.9%
56.1%
9.6%
13.6%
0.7%
0.7%
0.3%
1.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.3%
0.7%
56.0%
30.8%
4.2%
2.6%
0.7%
0.9%
1.9%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
84.8%
10.2%
0.3%
0.6%
1.7%
0.3%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
Asst. or Assoc. SID
71.1%
22.1%
1.2%
1.0%
1.1%
0.7%
1.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.2%
Strength Coaches
72.6%
11.4%
10.6%
1.1%
0.9%
0.2%
1.5%
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
Ticket Manager
56.7%
37.7%
1.8%
1.8%
0.2%
0.0%
0.4%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
24.5%
49.1%
13.5%
10.0%
0.0%
0.1%
1.2%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.3%
Business Mgr.
42.8%
48.3%
1.0%
2.1%
0.3%
0.7%
1.0%
2.8%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.7%
43.5%
42.3%
7.9%
4.4%
0.3%
0.3%
0.9%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Equipm ent Mgr.
75.4%
9.9%
7.0%
1.6%
1.9%
0.0%
2.4%
1.1%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
64.6%
26.5%
4.5%
1.1%
0.7%
0.7%
0.9%
0.2%
0.2%
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
Facility Mgr.
79.2%
11.6%
4.1%
1.6%
1.9%
0.3%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
17.8%
57.2%
10.6%
9.6%
0.5%
0.0%
1.4%
1.9%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
59.5%
32.3%
2.9%
2.4%
0.5%
0.0%
1.6%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
88.4%
9.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.4%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Asst. or Assoc. SID
69.7%
24.4%
1.5%
1.1%
0.6%
0.8%
0.6%
0.6%
0.2%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
Strength Coaches
75.2%
9.9%
10.3%
1.2%
0.8%
0.2%
0.8%
0.4%
0.6%
0.2%
0.0%
0.2%
Ticket Manager
52.4%
38.8%
3.3%
1.6%
1.0%
1.0%
1.3%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
2006-07
Data Not Recorded
2005-06
TABLE 33
62|P a g e
APPENDIXII
NCAADIVERSITYANDINCLUSIONINITIATIVES
TheNCAAhasalonghistoryofencouragingdiversitywithinandamongitsapproximately1,200
membercollegesanduniversities,conferencesandsupportingorganizations.TheAssociations
effortshaveprimarilybeendemonstratedbyprovidinginternshipprograms,trainings,
educationalsessions,professionaldevelopment,andintroducinglegislationtoinvokechange.
Thesuccessofthoseeffortshaveimpactednumerousstudentathletes,coachesand
administrators.
TofurtherguidetheNCAA,theAssociationsExecutiveCommitteeestablishedaDiversity,
Inclusion,andGenderEquityFrameworkthatstates:
Asacorevalue,theNCAAbelievesinandiscommittedtodiversity,inclusionandgender
equityamongitsstudentathletes,coachesandadministrators.Weseektoestablishand
maintainaninclusiveculturethatfostersequitableparticipationforstudentathletesand
careeropportunitiesforcoachesandadministratorsfromdiversebackgrounds.Diversityand
inclusionimprovethelearningenvironmentforallstudentathletesandenhanceexcellence
withintheAssociation.
TheNCAAwillprovideorenableprogrammingandeducation,whichsustainsfoundationsofa
diverseandinclusivecultureacrossdimensionsofdiversityincluding,butnotlimitedtoage,
race,sex,class,creed,educationalbackground,disability,genderexpression,geographical
location,income,maritalstatus,parentalstatus,sexualorientationandworkexperiences.
Programmingandeducationalsowillstrivetosupportequitablelawsandpractices,increase
opportunitiesforindividualsfromhistoricallyunderrepresentedgroupstoparticipatein
intercollegiateathleticsatalllevels,andenhancehiringpracticesforallathleticspersonnelto
facilitatemoreinclusiveleadershipinintercollegiateathletics.
Inadditiontothelongstandingfocusonitscommitmenttonurturingandencouragingdiversity
andinclusion,theNCAAwillfurtherfocuseffortsinthefollowingkeyareas:
1. Increasedfocusonpolicydevelopment,specificallylookingathowpoliciescaninform
decisionmakingintermsofcreatingmoreinclusiveenvironments.
2. Moreaggressiveoutreachtopresidentsandchancellorstoengagetheminadialogue
anddiscoursearoundinclusionissues.
3. Greateraffiliationandincreasedcollaborationwithothernationalorganizationsand
associationsthateitherhavediversityandinclusionasaprimarymissionor,likethe
NCAA,havesomeaspectofdiversityandinclusionwithintheircoreprinciples.
63|P a g e
BelowareprogramandinitiativesummarieshighlightingtheNCAAscommitmenttodiversity
andinclusion:
ProfessionalDevelopment
AchievingCoachingExcellence(ACE)isacollaborativeeffortoftheNCAAandtheBlackCoaches
andAdministrators(BCA)tofurtherthemissionandvisionoftheadvancementofminoritymen
andwomeninintercollegiateathletics.TheACEprogramisdesignedtoassistanalreadytalented
grouptobecomethenextgenerationofintercollegiateheadbasketballcoaches.
WomenCoachesAcademyprovidesskillstrainingforcoachesatalllevelstoassisttheminbeing
moreefficient,productive,resourcefulandsuccessful.Theskillstaughtwithintheacademyarenot
sportspecific,theyarefocusedontheprofessionaldevelopmentpartofcoachingthatincludes
everythingbeyondtheX'andO's.
NCAAFootballCoachesAcademies/ForumsareadministeredbytheNCAAwithsupportfromthe
AmericanFootballCoachesAssociation(AFCA),theBlackCoachesAssociation(BCA)andthe
NationalFootballLeague(NFL).Theyaredesignedtoaddressthelackofethnicminoritiesinthe
footballcoachingranks.Themissionoftheacademiesandforumsistoassistthecoacheswith
careeradvancementthroughskillsenhancement,networkingandexposureopportunitiesandto
raiseawarenessregardingthesubstantialpooloftalentedethnicminoritycoaches.Fourprograms
makeuptheacademiesandforumsincludingtheFutureCoachesAcademy,FootballCoaches
Academy,ExpertCoachesForum,andChampionsForum.
GenderEquityForumprovidesadministrators,coachesandstudentathletesanopportunityto
learnaboutgenderequityandTitleIXinthisannualthreedayseminar.Theseminarallowsthe
membershiptoaccessnationwidegenderequityexpertsanddiscussissuesrelevanttotheir
campusorconference.
NCAAPostgraduateInternshipProgramisaoneyearprogramthatprovidesonthejoblearning
experiencesforcollegegraduateswhoexpressaninterestinpursuingacareerinintercollegiate
athleticsadministrationbasedattheNCAAnationalofficeinIndianapolis,Indiana.
EmergingLeadersSeminar(ELS)isathreedayseminardesignedbytheNCAAnationaloffice
internstobringotherinternsfromNCAAmemberinstitutions,conferenceofficesandaffiliates
acrossthecountrytogethertonetworkwitheachotherandotherindustryexperts.Theseminar
goalsincludeassistingtheattendeestopolishtheirprofessionalskills,discussissuespertinentto
athletics,andimprovetheiroverallmarketabilitytopotentialemployers.Thisalsoprovidesan
educationalexperiencethatfacilitatesdialogueandcreatesawarenessregardingsocialand
legislativeissuesconfrontingintercollegiateathletics.
LeadershipInstituteforEthnicMinorityFemalesandMales(LeadershipInstitute)wasdesignedto
addressthecriticalshortageofseniorlevelprofessionalsofcolorinathleticsadministrativestaffat
NCAAmemberinstitutionsandwithinconferenceoffices.TheLeadershipInstituteseeksapplicants
64|P a g e
whohaveathleticsadministrativeexperienceortransferrableadministrativeexperiencesand
expressademonstratedcommitmenttodevelopprofessionallyasadministratorswithinthefieldof
athletics.TheLeadershipInstitutepreparesdiverseleadersthroughleadershiptrainingandskills
developmentexperience.
PathwayProgramisaoneyearprogramdesignedtoenhanceprofessionalskillsofwomenand
peopleofcolorwhoseektobecomedirectorsofathletics,througheducation,trainingand
mentorship.Inaddition,programparticipantsareprovidedwithanindepthlookintotheNCAA
governancestructureandareexposedtokeystakeholdersintheAssociation.
WomensLeadershipSymposiumisdesignedasaneducationalexperienceforprofessionalwomen
newtoworkinginintercollegiateathleticsandstudentsaspiringtoacareerincollegeathletics.
Thetwodayprogramfocusesonthefollowingareasofskilldevelopment:
1. LeadershipSkills(philosophy,communicationandconflictresolution).
2. ManagementStrategies(budget,financeandlegalissues).
3.CareerAdvancement(interviewingandnetworking).
Themissionoftheprogramistofurthertheparticipantsskills,expandtheirprofessionalnetwork
andpromotetherecruitmentandretentionofwomeninathleticsadministration.
WinningCareersinAthleticsisaprogramtoencouragefemalestudentstoexplorecareersin
intercollegiateathletics.Theintentionistoassistyoungwomenindevelopinganinterestinthe
professionsofcoachingandathleticsadministration.Participantsgainperspectiveandinsight
aboutcoachingandadministrationascareersandpreviewskillsneededtobesuccessfulwithinan
athleticsorconferenceofficeworkenvironment.
NCAA/NACWAAInstituteforAthleticsExecutivesoffersaconcentratedfourdayprogram(by
invitationonly)designedtoenhancethecareersofseniorrankingwomeninathletics
administrationattheNCAADivisionsI,IIandIIIlevel.Thecurriculumfocusesonleadershipand
communicationstrategies,contractnegotiations,legalissues,fundraising,searchesandhiring
processesandothercriticalissuessurroundingathleticsadministration.
NCAA/NACWAALeadershipEnhancementInstituteprovidesadvancededucationalopportunities
andprofessionaldevelopmentforNCAA/NACWAAAcademygraduateswhoarelookingformore
indepthtrainingindesignatedareasofathleticsadministration.Topicsinclude
management/leadershipstyles,budget/finance/fundraisingstrategies,careerenhancementskills
forthefuture,andothercontemporaryissues.Theformatincludespracticalapplications,case
studiesandinteractiveactivities.Inaddition,thereareopportunitiesforhottopicforumswith
thefaculty.
65|P a g e
GrantsandScholarships
MatchingGrantsforAdvancementofMinorityWomenCoachesareprovidedannuallytosupport
thedevelopmentofminoritywomencoachesinintercollegiateathletics.Conferenceoffices,
coachesassociationsandotherorganizationsfocusingonthedevelopmentofminoritywomen,as
wellasethnicminorityandwomencoachesatalllevels,areeligibletoapplyforgrantfunds.
DivisionIICoachingEnhancementGrantaddressestheissuesofaccess,recruitment,selectionand
longtermsuccessofwomen,ethnicminoritiesandotherindividualsinDivisionIIwhoseekto
overcomehiringbarriersbyprovidinggrantmoneyforthecreationofassistantcoachingpositions
inDivisionII.
NACWAAGrantisinpartnershipwithNACWAA(NationalAssociationofCollegiateWomenAthletic
Administrators)toprovideprofessionaldevelopmenttofemaleadministratorsinDivisionII.The
granthelpssupportattendanceattheannualNACWAAConventioninOctoberandsummer
programmingofferedthroughNACWAAandtheNCAA.
DivisionIIStrategicAllianceMatchingGrantProgramisafiveyearprogramthatprovidesfunding
toDivisionIIinstitutionsandconferenceofficestoenhancediversityandinclusionthroughfulltime
professionaladministrativepositionsinathleticsadministration.Selectedinstitutionsand
conferenceofficesreceivegrantfundingforthreeyearsandtheinstitutionorconferenceoffice
mustmaintainthepositionforaminimumoftwoadditionalyearsafterNCAAfundingexpires.
DivisionIIIStrategicAllianceMatchingGrantprovidesfundingforDivisionIIIinstitutionsand
conferenceofficestoenhancegenderandethnicdiversitythroughfulltimeprofessionalpositions
inathleticsadministration.Positionsmustincludesignificantadministrativeresponsibilities(i.e.,
hiring,budget,policydevelopmentandsupervisionofstaff).Additionally,positionsshouldbea
partofthecoredecisionmakingprocessandhaveanactiveroleontheleadershipteam.
EthnicMinorityandWomensInternshipGrantisatwoyeargrantdesignatedforDivisionIII
institutionsandconferenceofficestohire10monthfulltimeinterns.
SeniorWomanAdministratorEnhancementGrantisintheformofascholarshipandenhancesthe
roleoftheSeniorWomanAdministrator(SWA)inDivisionIIItosupportprofessionaldevelopment.
ApartnershipbetweentheNCAAandNACWAAprovidesDivisionIIIwomentheopportunityto
attendtheannualNCAA/NACWAAInstituteforAdministrativeAdvancement,aweeklong
professionaldevelopmentexperiencetoenhancetheirknowledgeandunderstandingof
intercollegiateathletics.
EthnicMinorityandWomensEnhancementPostgraduateScholarshipsforCareersinAthletics
aredesignedtoincreasethepoolofandopportunitiesforqualifiedminorityandfemalecandidates
inintercollegiateathleticsthroughpostgraduatescholarships.TheNCAAawards13scholarshipsto
ethnicminoritiesand13scholarshipstofemalecollegegraduateswhowillbeenteringtheirinitial
66|P a g e
yearofpostgraduatestudies.
Education
Oncampusdiversityeducationworkshopsprovideopportunityforstudentathletes,coaches,
athleticsadministrators,facultyandstafftoenhancetheirunderstandingandrespectfor
multiculturalismanddiversity.Theworkshopsprovideapositivelearningenvironmentthat
teachesthevaluesofdiversityinmaximizingteameffectiveness.Trainingisprovidedinthe
followingareas:Fundamental,AdvancedsessiononRace,Gender,SexualOrientationandCultural
Training.
Recognition
NCAAWomanoftheYearAwardhonorsseniorfemalestudentathleteswhohavedistinguished
themselvesthroughouttheircollegiatecareersintheareasofacademicachievement,athletics
excellence,communityservice,andleadership.
DiversityinAthleticsAwardsrecognizetheNCAAathleticsdepartmentsthatexcelintheareaof
diversity.TheawardsrepresentapartnershipbetweentheNCAAandtheLaboratoryforDiversity
inSportatTexasA&MUniversityandaredeterminedthroughresearchrelatingtovariousformsof
diversity.
SportandMarketDevelopment
EmergingSportsforWomenisaprogramintendedtoprovideadditionalathleticsopportunitiesto
femalestudentathletes.TheNCAACommitteeonWomensAthleticsisresponsibleformonitoring
emergingsportsponsorshipandlegislation.
WomensBasketballGrantProgramisafundingprogramdevelopedtoprovidesupportfor
DivisionIinstitutionsandconferencesinthedevelopmentandimplementationoftargeted
marketingplanstoraiseawarenessandenhanceattendanceofDivisionIwomensbasketball
programs.
Committees
ExecutiveCommitteeSubcommitteeonGenderandDiversityIssuesischargedwithproviding
reviewandrecommendationstotheExecutiveCommitteeonthefollowingfourareas:a)student
athletewelfare;b)genderissues;c)minorityissues;andd)youthissues.Thiscommitteeisan
Associationwidecommitteeandconsistsof12collegepresidents.
NCAAMinorityOpportunitiesandInterestsCommittee(MOIC)wasformedbytheAssociationin
January1991toreviewissuesrelatedtotheinterestsofethnicminoritiesandwomen.Theseissues
focusontheeducationandwelfareofminoritystudentathletes,aswellastheenhancementof
opportunitiesforethnicminoritiesandwomenincoaching,athleticsadministration,officiatingand
theNCAAgovernancestructure.
67|P a g e
NCAACommitteeonWomen'sAthleticshasamissiontoprovideleadershipandassistancetothe
associationinitseffortstoprovideequitableopportunities,fairtreatmentandrespectforall
womeninallaspectsofintercollegiateathletics.Thecommitteeseekstoexpandandpromote
opportunitiesforfemalestudentathletes,administratorsandcoaches.Thecommitteepromotes
governance,administrationandconductofintercollegiateathleticsattheinstitutional,conference
andnationallevelsthatareinclusive,fairandaccessibletowomen.
CommunityOutreach
TheNCAAnationalofficestaffiscommittedtoservingthecommunityinwhichweworkandlive.
Thenationalofficesimpactismadethroughsponsorships,volunteerhelp,andinkinddonationsto
manylocal,andnationalorganizations.

The 2010 Racial and Gender Report Card: College Sport

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

The 2010 Racial and Gender Report Card: College Sport

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

MediaContact:KelvinAng

Data Not Recorded

Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black Institutions excluded.

NCAA Managing Directors/Directors

Data Not Recorded

Data Not Recorded

Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black Institutions excluded.

Historically Black Institutions excluded.

NCAA Support Staff

Data Not Recorded

Note: Data provided by the NCAA. Historically Black Institutions excluded.

Total Full-Time NCAA Staff

Note: Data provided by the NCAA.

Note: Historically Black Institutions excluded.

Male Student-Athletes: Division I

Basketball Football Baseball

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Asian/ Pacific Islander

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Asian/ Pacific Islander

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Native Haw aiian/Pacific Islander

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Data Not Recorded

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Data Not Recorded

x=Data not recorded

Female Student-Athletes: Division I

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Asian/ Pacific Islander

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Asian/ Pacific Islander

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Native Haw aiian/Pacific Islander

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

x=Data not recorded

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native

Am erican Indian/Alaskan Native