CASE HAND-IN Team Experience Expectations and Marking Guide

4 exceeded expectations
TEAM POLICIES, RULES, AND OBJECTIVES well-thought out and sensible rules and policies that enhance team performance demonstrated clear understanding of difference between rule and policy objectives clearly show understanding of task used group members strengths and weaknesses in way that enhances team performance strong and clear reasoning given for assignments

3 met expectations
reasonable and sufficient rules and policies demonstrated understanding of difference between rule and policy objectives show understanding of task

2 below expectations
rules and policies attempted but not sensible and/or sufficient weak understanding of difference between rule and policy objectives show limited understanding of task unclear as to how group members strengths and weaknesses used or inappropriate use weak reasoning given for assignments

1 0 failed to meet
rules and policies insufficient and/or unproductive did not demonstrate understanding of difference between rule and policy objectives unclear and/or unrelated

GRADE

DIVISION OF LABOUR

used group members strengths and weaknesses appropriately reasonable reasoning given for assignments

group members strengths and weaknesses not used appropriately weakens group little or no reasoning given for assignments

TEAM FUNCTIONING; STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES

strong, insightful discussion of how group functioned strong, insightful understanding of strengths and weaknesses of group

solid discussion of how group functioned solid understanding of strengths and weaknesses of group

weak discussion of how group functioned weak understanding of strengths and weaknesses of group

poor discussion of how group functioned poor understanding of strengths and weaknesses of group

PROBLEM & SOLUTION

(only one (1) necessary, but more can be given if page limit allows and other requirements not weakened as a result)

choice of problem to choice of problem to discuss adequate and discuss demonstrates reasonable insight into purpose of adequate assignment understanding of strong, insightful problem understanding of problem appropriate solution really appropriate and productive solution that enhanced group functioning

choice of problem to discuss does not demonstrate insight into purpose of assignment weak understanding of problem solution not reasonable or appropriate

choice of problem to discuss inappropriate limited or no understanding of problem inappropriate or unproductive solution that weakens group functioning

LESSONS LEARNED
(only three(3) necessary, but more can be given if page limit allows and other requirements not weakened as a result)

lessons clear and impactful demonstrated really strong insight into effective team performance really thorough reporting of group activities appropriate and useful agenda and minutes

lessons clear and reasonable demonstrated adequate insight into effective team performance adequate reporting of group activities appropriate agenda and adequate minutes

lessons adequate but overall weak demonstrated limited insight into effective team performance limited reporting of group activities weak agenda and minutes

lessons clear and insightful demonstrated little to no insight into effective team performance very limited reporting appeared to be created after-the-fact inappropriate agenda and limited to no minutes

APPENDIX CHRONOLOGY OF MEETINGS, AGENDA AND MINUTES

/24 =

/2